Bitcoin Forum

Lets get discuss about the differences between the developed nation and the developing nation.

First of all employment is the thing which makes the countries stand out from each other in well developed nation there will be enough employment option will be made by their government according to the population on their country which can increase the better standard of living in that countries but the developing nations are struggling to find the job opportunities for their people.

Employment rate will be a determinant on how progressive a country is however it's just one of those since GDP will be a big factor in every economic performance of a country and therefore we can differentiate those developed and developing country.

But still no matter how high the employment rate but the unemployment rate is much more higher it can subsequently affect the performance, otherwise per capita income, poverty rate is also a must look in every developing country. Perhaps we can say that developed country is at stable stage and we should be looking carefully at those that's still underdevelop.

Yes the developed country means their citizen to have some employment provided or supported by the government but most of the third world countirs don't have any job fo their people so they left being in the poverty,but what are the other factors determines the developed and developing country?

I assume when we speak about the developing countries then there is always problems with their education system and poor people are spreader all over the nation due to this reason. This puts the nation into a stressful development stage where there is no enough educated people who can make their contribution to the countries development and thus it slows down the process of development. Apart from this if education is not there then there is also no employment as you stated and thus no more income sources and no more tax filings. The tax is what government use to provide salaries to the government officials as well as to develop the national infrastructure. Now everything opposite to this one happens within the developed countries.

I don't think the education system is a reason because there are many developing countries producing lot of graduates but after they get graduated they move to an developed nation because where they can get more salary than in their country so again the same problem the unemployment stops the people from being contribute to their countries.

It simply boils down to the very basic principle of economic laws, if a country which has a unstable or lack economic stability then it trickles down as how the society is portray. Just like what you have said, every year in your country lots of individual graduated but the government can't give them jobs and their only options is to go out of your country. So its obvious that the government lack the financial and economic growth needed to sustain that country. But if a country like China or Japan or even Germany whose GNP has successful increasing, there's no doubt that they can offer better employment opportunities to their people.

I am sure there are many differences between the two. If one country who is having strong economic bone and who is having stage of tax free states or at least tax exemption policies is something closed to the developed country. Not only that, we can also do the comparison according to how much Information Technology assets they have in their country. I mean if the country is having strong IT background then surely it is moving towards the future faster than the others and with the current requirement of the IT infra I am sure those countries can be called as far developed than the rest due to their capacity to work with full capacity. This way we can end up having many differences and I guess its vain to compare them as each country will slowly be a developed nation with the time as they go on adopting the techs.

The income difference in a country, I think, is one of the things that is very obvious with developing countries. In relatively poor countries, you will see super rich people in their luxury cars and beggars. Gated / walled exclusive subdivisions with shanties just a block away. It's just extremes.

I think corruption is also the biggest difference of developed and developing countries because politicians stole all the tax money of people so when the governments needs fund for creating new jobs then it will be not enough.But we need to remember that the developing nation's politicians were super rich than the developed nation's politicians so we need to pick the right leaders for the good future of the our country.

Its common fucking sense. Employment doesn't do shit. In countries like India more people are employed but they are paid dog-shit. Does that make them a developed country? NO!

The main difference between the developing and developed countries is the power they have, especially in terms of arms. African country have a fuckload of resources, but they are underdeveloped. US has little to no resources yet they are over-developed. US can literally destroy countries if they want, but if they do,well its gonna be bad for them too, so that's why they aren't. So the US is more focused on ending African countries economically than going for a war.

I will briefly look at the differences with three different factors namely : Economic strength, political stability and education and  technical growth.
1. The economic strength also covers the ability of the government to attract employment to the citizen which empowers them out of the street and give them high standard of living, robust national economy due to exportation cumulating into strong and reliable currency.

2. Show me a country that is ridden in war and I will count their losses for you.

3. Education and technological growth goes together. This is the creative industry which off course helps the country and adds to the GDP either as terrorism, acquisition of best brains from other countries because of good working environment etc.


I don't think corruption can be a factor here because even in developed countries, you will find corruption being endemic in the midst of the people in government. To this extent, I think the difference here is that the developed countries abide to democracy and the law reigns. Some of the factors of such democracies are the rule of law and supremacy of the constitution. So they keep to the laws in the constitution so that, whoever contravenes the law is punished according to the same law. Hence, it is not that there are no corrupt politicians or people in developed countries but they also have the political will to excute judgements including death sentences not withstanding whose ox is gord.


Some times I think it is suppose to be the way which could indicate that the candidate is going in government for service having reached the pick of his/career endervour and not to amerse wealth because this is the situation in developing countries, their politicians see government offices as a means to clamp to wealthy status, steal money, acquire illegal properties etc.

Army resources is only denotes about the powerful nation but many developing countries have high army force but developed nation have very powerful army foces but as you said the African nation overloaded with much resources but they are not utilizing it because of their government so it again denotes the good and bad politician causes the difference from developed to developing nation.

the first point of developed countries in the world is the strong culture they have and they will spread it to other countries
the second point of education systems in developed countries such as Finland is very different from developed countries
and the last point is a sense of nationalism

In developed countries a lot of infrastructures had been put in places and functional eg accessible roads, well equipped hospitals and schools, affordable houses, regular electricity supply having all these structures will invariably create job opportunities meanwhile in developing countries most of this infrastructure are not available making life difficult to live and there is wipe spread of unemployment.

Every country runs development in all fields of life with its resources. During the process, there are countries that can progress and some are still developing.

I think, Here are the brief differences between developed and developing countries;

DEVELOPED COUNTRIES

• High per capita income
• Low Unemployment Rate
• Main Economic Activities in the Industrial and Services Sector
• Low Population Growth Rate
• The high level of education

DEVELOPING COUNTRY

• Low per capita income
• Still High Unemployment Rate
• Economy Relying on Primary Sector
• High Population Growth Rate
• Low levels of health and education

We only give those countries regarded as developing countries hope by wanting to appreciate their effort in trying to get headway in their endeavors but the fact remains, there are only two categories and that is undeveloped and developed. To really know the difference between the two, just look at every working models in the developed world then think of the opposite that is what you find in the other set of countries and that is why you realize that aside for natural disasters, that one cannot control, every other disaster is present in those countries. That is where you see they are having civil wars, terrorist is occupying some portion of their countries, there is ethnic cleansing, you get to see election malpractices, incompetent leaders, corruption on a large scale, reliance mainly on loans to finance their budget then embezzle, no room for merit, focus on frivolities in place of facts, no service to the nation but pocket service, security is for the highest bidder, absolute reliance on foreign aid to having a good run in the year etc. How on earth can countries battling those challenges can be said to be developing?

Employment rate and the minimum wage is the difference I mainly see between a developed and a developing country. High employment rate with a high minimum wage supports employees and in turn, returns huge tax for the government to work with. Employers caring enough for their employees often turn out to be productive and profit big, and it's just a chain reaction from there. Most of the time, developing countries are plagued with capitalists that don't care with the well-being of their employees, and no matter how many jobs a capitalist create, if the rate of wage remains stagnant and not compensating the employees well enough, it wouldn't mark any progress and would hinder the growth not only of the employees but also the economy as well.

Well, it's not necessary to judge only by working places. A developed country is characterized by the presence of different types of industry, its exports and so on

You just rephrased what I said.

High army force? Seriously? Do the governments of the developing countries give those in army weed to survive or to compensate as their salary? Bring up more strong valid points, the ones you have are way too common.

Too many difference about these thing. A developed country moves slower than the developing country, and mostly the developed country is a big and powerful country which makes them more powerful. In terms of market growth, the developed country is still on top while the developing country still having a hard time to grow economically.

I think you can deduced the difference from the word itself. Developed nations means they have molded into becoming one of the world superpower in terms of their financial growth and stability. While those developing nations are yet to achieved this because of several factors.


Unemployment is one success criteria for a nation to be called developed country. If your government can't provide a good living condition and employment for this populace, then it will be struggle for your country. Its very difficult to see nations growing if their own population chooses to work and go abroad to earn decent money to have a better standard of living. Governments like Singapore used to be a 3rd world or underdeveloped, but in the last 20 years they already transformed as one of the biggest economy in the world, so it can be done.

Developed countries are of course more prepared in all respects compared to developing countries, this involves several aspects such as the economy, infrastructure, and government regulations. In developed countries, the people tend to be smarter in investing because their mindsets are different from those of developing countries. source that the most bitcoin holder is dominated by developing countries such as Japan, America, England and others

Developed countries are special terms that are embedded in countries with a relatively high standard of living in the technology sector and have an equitable economy. It can be concluded that developed countries are a country whose people have high quality of life and welfare. Commonly, a country that has high national income is considered a developed country. Developed countries have relatively low population growth rates. The infant mortality rate is also very low, this is due to advances in medicine.

Most residents in developed countries can read and continue their studies to college. One factor that causes the progress of social development in developed countries is social security that protects against the risk of loss of income such as workplace accidents, disability, illness, pregnancy, unemployment, and old age.

The most important thing to consider developed countries is low  unemployment. It is a specific characteristic of developed countries, economy of certain country will not run well unless the number of job desks is low and unemployment is high.

I am not smart to talk about this, but I would like to tray share my idea. Commonly, developed country is measured and defined by the economic, social and education sides. It is measured by developed countries when the number of unemployment is low and many available job desks for the citizen. Second is social, developed countries having low of population growth. Then the reading awareness of citizen including children, teenagers and old are high. It means that many of them are able to keep and continue their study to university.

Developing country are trying to be same as developed countries, It is mostly same as developed countries. It measured by characteristic that were mentioned in developed countries.

If the difference in income here in our country, for me is the thing that really implies the development of different countries. In small countries, we see many wealthy and luxury cars but people who are usually living in poverty and sometimes people to live by asking money and food gated / houses like an exclusive subdivision with in which poor people to it's just a block away. It's just too much.

developed countries

Are the ones that in my own point of view can do anything which can do more it does not means it is developed it is a past tense for me it can do more and  learn more. to make anything and expand. It does not stop to its limits, it expands.

developing countires

Are the one that are growing they are the people who grows step by step and shows improvement of it's past capabilities. They learn and innovate and keep on growing until it can be called develped country.

Also I would say, speaking of DEVELOPED bitcoin would really help a country and it can be connected to any employment and poverty problem.

I observe first world countries have their own technology and companies, while developing countries have cheap labor force and usually work for these foreigner companies. Population might be another factor: Developed countries aren't overpopulated in relation to their territory size, developing countries are. Developed countries export manufactured products, while developing countries export raw materials or cheaper products.

In responding to the differences between developed and developing countries we can see the quality of its population. Those who live in developing countries still use traditional tools in their daily lives, in contrast to developed countries that have used technological tools to help their daily lives.

Both of these factors are very influential on the development of a country, generally developed countries have a livelihood in the field of industry and services such as examples of industrial fields are the automobile industry, electronics, heavy equipment, aircraft, or others, while the example of services is financial services , education, entertainment, and consultants. However, for developing countries the average livelihood of the community is greater in agriculture or fisheries.

Surely, these two factors greatly influence the mindset of a society, those who live in developing countries tend to maximize existing work and cannot innovate into other industries. While for someone who lives in developed countries, they always try to make a job that will be useful for the progress of their country.

Honestly there are lots of job opportunities in those "developing nations" but those people itself are not helping themselves to find a job. Unemployment rate shouldn't always be blame to the government since in the end, it's depend on the people.

Struggling because they don't want to work? because of low salary offer? No it's not. Some are just lazy and want money to knock on their door automatically. Yes there are companies that have some restrictions or requirements but there are lots of companies not just them. It's impossible that even few of that thousands will not fit for people's criteria.

While government is doing something to reduced unemployment, people must also step up and don't rely purely on government.

Yes its true and goverment in developed country are provide more services into their people compared with developing country, and also many economy sector in developing country are owned by developed country. In education developed country are more into skill and knowledge, in developing country we are learn almost everything and we are more into common knowledge rather than specialization on certain skills.

Developed countries has a good economy while countries that are currently developing does not have a stable economy which can be highly affected by the growth of cryptocurrency.

Business opportunities is also a thing which can differentiate between the developing and developed countries,most of the developing countires not allowing or supporting their people to create their own business which can help to decrease the unemployment rate which also one of the big factors of developing nations.

Loool:

https://www.investopedia.com/articles/markets-economy/090516/10-countries-most-natural-resources.asp



What army does Japan have? Or the Netherlands? Or Denmark?
You should really watch this movie about Africa, Empire of Dust (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1a-QpyF7rNc)
It's not the US army who is forcing millions of Indians to shit and pee in the streets  ;)


Density is relly not a criteria

Density per sq km
Netherlands      416
Belgium                   355   
Japan                   337   

Botswana      3.4
Angola      15
Madagascar   35

Many factors are needed to consider in labeling a country if it is developed or developing. The number of employed, unemployed, and underemployed is also needed to be considered. You can also considered the GDP, population and other factors.

That is right, with what I have observed those who are in the developed countries usually pays higher tax, less crimes and those who has reported less corruption , here in our country I can say that we have a developing country but those who people are taking advantage on it too, especially corrupt politician so some people remains poor despite of the economic growth.

A developed country, industrialized country, more developed country, or more economically developed country (MEDC), is a sovereign state that has a developed economy and advanced technological infrastructure relative to other less industrialized nations. Most commonly, the criteria for evaluating the degree of economic development are gross domestic product (GDP), gross national product (GNP), the per capita income, level of industrialization, amount of widespread infrastructure and general standard of living.[1] Which criteria are to be used and which countries can be classified as being developed are subjects of debate.

While developing country (or a low and middle income country (LMIC), less developed country, less economically developed country (LEDC), or underdeveloped country) is a country with a less developed industrial base and a low Human Development Index (HDI) relative to other countries.[2] However, this definition is not universally agreed upon. There is also no clear agreement on which countries fit this category.[3] A nation's GDP per capita compared with other nations can also be a reference point.

developed countries: The main livelihoods of people in developed countries are industrial and service sectors. Examples of industrial fields are the automobile industry, electronics, heavy equipment, aircraft, and finished food. Examples of services are financial services, education, entertainment, and consultants.
developing countries: Economy Relying on Primary Sector
The economy in developing countries still relies on primary sectors such as agriculture, forestry, mining and fisheries. This sector still relies on natural wealth. Activities in the manufacturing and service industries are still lacking. This is because the production technology that is controlled is still low and only relies on traditional ways to process existing resources.

I think one significant difference between the developed and the underdeveloped countries is that, the developed countries have relatively peace in their country as resources are fairly distributed across the whole nation but the same cannot be said of the underdeveloped countries. Most developing countries are faced with issues of wars and poor governance resulting in unfair distribution of the countries resources or wealth among the citizens.

indeed more problems must be faced by developing countries. i think main thing is human resources. to improve human resources many supporting factors must be met, such as education, health, etc.

If a country will provide enough opportunity for employment for every individual, I can say that country is a developed country. As the economy of the country developed, better social protection service also being developed.

I don't have any extra ordinary opinion but as far as i know. Those countries can be called developed countries where every person have a job There's no poverty exist there plus all are working for their country.

Yes that is true. I do not know what is the secret of those developed countries how they can handle to give a work for those unemployed. Well, I think its start to their leader then down to its subordinate to proclaim some regulations to help their people. However, for those developing nation I think they need to unite so that they will level up their living.

Having many people in their country is hard to increase the per capita income and find the employment opportunities so many developing countries struggling to control their population growth rate but if there is a well government can manage them then all the human resources can be used for the developing purpose.

The difference is the politicians who need to maintain their government but they are just stealing all the tax money from people into their own pocket.

To me, the main difference of the developed countries separating from the developing countries are the degree of the rule of law.

I think the biggest thing holding developing countries back is the lack of infrastrucutre (schools, roads, libraries, technology( The world is all becoming united but its happening slowly.

You concerned the very interesting theme for discussion. I live in a developing country but the term "developing" means an action, progress and evolving but unfortunately there are stagnation and degradation in my country so I would name the state of the country as undeveloped because the country is not developed and there is no developing. The main attributes of an "undeveloped" country are the incredible high level of corruption, theft, very low salaries, commodity economy, no honest courts, alcoholism and so on. To take the situation under control the government increases the staff of policemen (and other military) constantly. Moreover the control in the country is based on fear and lie.
There are positive moments but they happen not so often and usually positive events are announced on TV like something incredibly important. Small part of people are quite clever and the nature is nice but it is not sufficient to live good enough so it is a pity but in such a state my country do not have the good future. I think much people would leave the country but they do not have enough money and confidence in themselves.

in my opinion, the difference between developed and developing countries is in the industrial sector. Where developed countries have large-scale industries, low unemployment, high life expectancy and a fair economy. While developing countries are countries that are trying to advance.

I will also admit that my country is still on a developing stage. We are still lack of full employment in terms of economic situation. Their aren't enough jobs to offer and they are still many men here who are jobless. While an established and developed country always had a good economic growth, offered so many jobs. And the percentage of a jobless men is just small.

Look how stupidly this thread has been delivered,thats why its called “developing country “because its under development so how could you expect lots of Job opportunities in that region?Offourse thats the difference between the two countries noon

Their differences of those two are the economy,the one is struggling and the one is stable

In many cases the worst thing about developing countries is not that they don't have the money to pay people for their work, especially in public sector, but that the money is constantly being stolen by corrupt officials. All of us have seen the stories of millionaires from developing countries where most people are very poor. Those millionaires are, in fact, either former or current corrupt officials or their relatives. The only hope for countries like that lies in implementation of blockchain technology in the government sector. If the movement of all taxpayers' money was absolutely transparent it would be almost impossible to steal from the money.

That is why most of the governments were opposing the blockchain and bitcoin,if it got implemented then all the transactions will be accessible by everyone and it is impossible to change any values.As you said most of the developing nations don't have the right politicians or educated one who can think about future of their country,all they were doing right now is just filling their pockets with our tax money and left the government account with none for the improvement of their country.

There is a lot that will always be bad with developing countries and that is the fact that the system is rotten, there is really no database for anything, no transparency, everything doing whatever they like, no visionary leaders, and for what it is, this has always been the major problem for developing countries which all based down on high level of corruption.

If some of these things are not out, it will be hard to even create infrastructures, hard for industries to grow and more to pop up and hard to see employment and with that criminal rate increases. Some of the things you will not find in developed countries.

One if the differences between developed countries and a developing one is availability of adequate infrastructural facilities like constant power supply, good road networks and transportation system. These are the things that will increase the GDP of a country and make it compete with the developed countries of the world. I live in country where these things are in deficient state, so we are a far cry from what a developed countries should be

A big difference we can see between developed and developing country by the factor of the acceptance of the cryptocurrency also because many times I figured out that those countries which are developed like America and Australia  , approved the use of cryptocurrency in legal way but those developing have not made a clear descion regarding this matter .
Here as a example in my country we can see that government is not ready to approve the use of cryptocurrency with freedom or with particular rules , but day by day a new case we can see that the government empowered authorities teams are making raid to caught the cryptocurrency users in bulk amount and I don't think that is good action by them because at one side governments are not ready to make particular rules and regulations and at another side they are going against the cryptocurrency users .
Atleast they should make better rules and regulations or wither they should make a rule to ban it directly , so that we can use it with full confidence that no one thinking that we are doing something wrong or good .

As they say in my Homeland. "Fish rots from the head" If the head of the country is a smart ruler, then any developing country in 5-10 years can develop its economy very much. Here is an example of India. A country that is ahead of everyone in metallurgy. Who would have known 5 years ago.

For simpler explanation:
Developed countries have a stable employment rate and the distribution of jobs are enough for their overall population.
Developing countries do have growing employment rate while trying to be balanced with the growth of their population.

All the examples of high population density per km² countries are losing population on long term (probably it can reverted in Netherlands and Belgium due mass immigration, but then it's another story). People from developed countries tend to have less children for some reason.

And these Africa countries population is growing fast on long term. One of the reasons may be due the mortality rates are decreasing. Africa is one of the most chaotic continents in the world, many epidemics and wars make the population grow slower, but it doesn't mean they tend to have less children.

Well, it's just an observation. You will find exceptions, but from a general perspective it really makes sense.

Hmmm maybe but it doesn't make much difference among the developed and developing countries because both of them may accept the crypto currencies only in very few places and it doesn't make much employment opportunity by form of payment but most of the developing countries has neutral status on the cryptos so no barrier for the people to use it,if they want they can use it for their purpose to make money.

I think the main difference of developed countries such as China, USA, South Korea and Japan to Developing countries such as Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam and many more is the capability of the countries to manufacture products and import it to all countries worldwide. Most of developed countries right now is a Producer countries importing products all of the world. While the developing countries is much more of a consumer countries. As you can see developed countries is the trendsetter and the pioneer in Science and Advanced technology.

Yeah, I can agree with that but they are losing population only AFTER they have reached a developed status.
And people in developed countries tend to do that because they want to still have some time off while raising kids (impossible with 8) and because they are planning ahead, you won't be able on the average wage to sustain 8 kids at the level you can do with 2.

In poor countries...those are stupid ideas. You need to keep producing them to help you at work, screw education, screw other needs, all that is important is manpower. No wonder in many countries families is really disappointed when they get a daughter and not a son.

Besides, density is also heavy influenced by a lot of other factors.
If we look at Japan and New Zealand,330 vs 15 per km2, both islands, both developed countries yet....
Even if we talk about African Countries, Nigeria is at 200 while Niger at 15.
And there are huge differences even in the US, for example, Nebraska and California.

Nope, density is not a factor, unless we talk about the density of public toilets per sq km2, which I'm pretty sure would paint a better picture

Yeah, but they can't be openly that bad. The governments justify their unwillingness to implement blockchain technology. They say to their citizens that it is a dangerous thing used by terrorists, drug dealers and other criminals, and that's why many people still perceive it as such. Hopefully this situation will not last long because, in fact, it is used less and less by criminals and more and more by respected organizations, and the governments will have no other choice than implementing it.

It is a very good observation and trusts me, the rate things are going in this part of the world, and I really wonder how things would get to be in the long run. I believe the whole thing stems down from the leaders, and truth be told, most part of Africa lack very good leaders and because of this, things will always keep getting stalled most especially when it comes to development at large.

Hardly will you be able to find so much exception and a higher percentage are really not developed and even the developing ones which some people may still want to classify a bit as developed still have a lot lagging.

DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
Low Unemployment Rate
Main Economic Activities in the Industrial and Services Sector
Low Population Growth Rate
The high level of education

DEVELOPING COUNTRY
Low per capita income
Still High Unemployment Rate
Economy Relying on Primary Sector
High Population Growth Rate
Low levels of health and education

Unlike developed countries, economically developing countries are called countries with poorly developed economies, low economic potential, backward technology and technology, a non-progressive structure of industry and the economy as a whole, trying to overcome the barrier of backwardness, to reach the level of more developed countries.

The developed countries invented the technology the whole world has access nowadays, even the developing countries. It's acceptable they needed manpower a century or centuries ago, when these technologies weren't disponible yet. Once new technologies came in, they were shared with another countries too (machinery, vehicles, tools, internet, cellphones, computers, transgenic food, etc...). The whole world was benefited, including the poor countries. So why would they still need manpower like in the old times?

Also note that assistencialism nowadays is much stronger than times ago.

If they had followed the developed countries trend, they would be more wealthy nowadays. As you said: "you won't be able on the average wage to sustain 8 kids at the level you can do with 2." The same premise worths for developed and developing countries. This mass production developing countries keep doing isn't necessary anymore on the modern world... But they keep doing this.

As you said, countries start losing population AFTER they reach a developed status, that is Japan's case. New Zealand was established by British people, another situation; There are countries which part of their territory is uninhabitable, and it can also happen in regions inside a same country: Like drought areas, protected environmental areas... Instead of looking the general density of a country, to look the cities density would be wiser. They are overpopulated, precarious and keep increasing without planning, that is a characteristic of developing countries.

Countries with very low income, that is, if per capita income is less than 785 dollars.
and there are groups of developed countries with high income, that is, if their per capita income exceeds 9,656 dollars.

For me,the indicator of a developed country is the level and accessibility of education,compliance and implementation of laws,social protection,high level of income, good environment.It is difficult to draw parallels between a developed country and a developing one. In essence, a developing country wants all that a developed country already has.

Government should overspend during bad times and underspend during good times. When the economy heats up, the government should take in more that it lays out. This reduction in the money supply will cool the economy, reducing inflation. When we’re in a recession, the government should spend more than it takes in. This increase to the money supply will help the economy pick up again.

Great thing to know that, here in our country is considered country with low capital income or poor country because many people are jobless and many people don't have a regular job or even capital money that they can use for business, a company that are growing much here are those financial company who used to lend money.

Same with my country too.I have lived here for almost 35 years but until now my country remains to be still developing.Majority of the politicians have promised to give lot of job opportunities so that people here will not think anymore of going to other countries to earn a living but until now only few of the politicians have keep their promises.My country is still in a developing country.

Got a point. At the same time developed countries considered not only the industry but also the resources they have.they focused on how the economy will grow, well all countries wabt it. But in developed countries they consider a lot of factors rather than developing. Developing did not consider lot of things, they also focused on developing itself.

The biggest difference that I see between the countries that are developed and those that are still in the process of developing is the education system, in the countries that are developed you will see that the education system actually works and a person that is poor can progress in its society as long as he makes an effort in school and gets a good job, but in countries that are just developing the education system is terrible even when the government invest a lot of money in it and so people never get out of poverty for lack of education and opportunities.

I believe that the fundamental difference between a developed country and developing country is the process of transformation and the pace of growth. That's the reason why you will see the flow of money is move towards the developing countries as it has the ability to give more returns as compared to that of developed countries. The stagnant economy is the core reason behind the outflow of money from developed countries.

Well it is clear after a lot of discussion here on the forum that what developed and developing countries are so we should proceed for further discussion. We are noticing that developing countries have to develop more and more but as well we are noticing that developed countries are still looking for development and they are moving towards new technological systems in order to obtain stability and to solve the problems they are still facing with.

Called developed means that the country is already above the developing economies, and has a per capita income of over $ 12,000. When looking at the numbers above, of course, people in developed countries have more than enough of standard of living. For example countries in Europe, most are developed countries.

The difference will be very large. I believe that developing countries have insufficient international influence and their population efficiency is not very high. There are many people living in poverty.

a sad fact is Government persons/politicians of most developing countries are very rich. but the people of that country living in poverty or are medal class. it's all because of the corruption and lack of education. if people educate their kids they could help the country development.

and one more sad fact is when a new generation from developing country complete it's higher education and ready to start a new life. they'll start searching for jobs especially govt jobs. but they hesitate to start their own work. they think of getting big govt posts.  but when they don't get a job they start getting panic and involve in alcoholic

The main difference in my opinion should be quality of service and not really industrialization or buildings. It'd be lovely to live somewhere close to nature or in a village with great quality Healthcare, Security, Education, insurance, Food market,
I think this can be achieved with Blockchain/Cryptocurrency.


Cities are not just my thing. They are just too metallic and artificial for me.

That case are happening to those country that governments does not care to their fellow countrymen, they are greedy and selfish to the power they have that's why any countries struggling to unemployment rate so now that developing country is hard to help because the problem has come root and long before it's fixed.

That is why the Crypto market is attracted by many Asians. In Asia there are many developing countries and I think the Crypto market has made many people have changed their lives spectacularly. I have witnessed a poor friend of mine joining in this market since 2016, now he has money to buy a home.

You know, reality is pretty damn harsh sometimes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Im_8sI0QFQ
7:25 , people applauding a 2500 year-old invention  :o

Some trips in the poorest areas of your country or in some asian or African country would make you change your mind about how much access they have to technology.

The differences are enormous and it will take a decade before they at least learn about that stuff, probably a century before they can afford it. Even Eastern Europe lags well behind western Europe, with a lot of villagers still depending on horses for farming and transporting stuff, in other countries they can't have even those.


How the hell can one database provide you healthcare or security or education?
You need doctors, teachers and security personnel for that, and shady ICOs won't be able to do squat about that.

Yeah, employment is one big factor when you are relating the development of a company and when we also talk about the avenue to easily do business, the availability of infrastructure, the industrialization of a place and so many more make the whole thing balls down to the fact that if some of these things are not available, employment rate will always get higher. So this whole lot makes the difference between a developed country and underdeveloped ones.

Normally, development is totally based on the economy of the country and the value of the economy, the standard of living of people and how well they are taken care of with all the amenities provided for them to live a good life. Simply, this is not something anyone can see in an underdeveloped country and that is what differentiates them.

Usually, if there is infrastructure, businesses will thrive better, there will be more organizations popping up, unemployment rate will reduce and things would get better.

Developed countries are very subjective which will mainly tackle the country's state of infrastructures, Income per capita and Standard of living. Now i am living in a developing country i guess, since i am seeing my country's economy growing as years passes by but there is really a problem, a root of all which disables the government to fully overcome and give its people a great suffering. Corruption.

Yes you're right. My country belongs to top 10 that has a big population all over the world. Every year there are thousands or million graduated in different courses but job opportinuties are not enough. With that, professionals have no choice but to go abroad because in abroad there are lot of jobs waiting plus big salary. So instead of professionals will help or can help the country, they are helping other country.

In my opinion, the difference between developed and developing countries is about the stability of its economy. If we talk about developed countries it has stable economy: like infrastructures, high employment rate, advancement of technology and educational background of the state. While in a developing countries it is in a process of growing.

Now that they have scythes, the work executed by 10 before can be executed by 2. Less manpower is needed, let's see if it will reflect on the population growment tendency or not.

There are traditional villages like that everywhere, but they are decreasing even more as technology is coming. From your perspective the population should be decreasing as well... But it's not happening.

more jobs are created if their economy is not limited to its local employment, if they are open country that has many foreign investors, it can generate more employment or jobs, this is a picture of a well oiled economy, more jobs created more development.

developped countries are the ones that do not export raw materials but imports. non developped countries are the ones that sell raw materials instead of produce a product and sell. developing countries are the ones that just started producing.

Partially right but now a days the companies from the developed countries coming to the developing nations where the raw materials were abundant in nature and also the man power can be much cheaper than the developing nations but later they will take the profits made from the products in the developing countries to their developed country.

This is something that economic student have to know or at least they learn this in school, college or university. This was something that i learn but it was long time ago and will try to make some facts about it in some way.

First developed and developing countries are divided into two categories. This classification of countries is based on the economic status such as GDP, GNP, per capital income, industrialization, the standard of living, and more more aspects. Or you can use some things that you now already or you are read or seen on tv for example. Lets say like this Developed countries have low unemployment, good living conditions, high industrial growth, high living standard, in some words they have good and above standard for everything. In case of developing countries it little different. They have high unemployment, moderate living conditions, they have moderate or low industrial standard, moderate or low living standard.

So in perspective developed countries have good or above economy and industrialization, and developing countries have moderate and bellow economy and industrialization. Another example can be what countries are developed and what are in developing.

this is a disadvantage for developing countries where human resources lag. raw materials are taken by developed countries and their products are sold again to developing countries. for this reason, high human resources are the main differentiator

Developed countries has a lot of obligations towards their people’s and has a large economy to keep on

While developing countries has a simple problem with a simple solutions,as long as the people and the government are workinh together,just like vietnam they are self sufficient even if they are a developing economy and now a competitive for asian nations

Human resources are also high in nature of a developing countries that is why they can get cheap man power in the developing countries like India or Indonesia and the products are also sold back to the developing countries but the profits were taken back to their origin countries.This is happening because of the corrupted politicians and government officials who let them to do what they want.

I don’t think having jobs is the problem, well it’s a problem but not really, cause I believe that the government any country can be able provide jobs for their citizens no matter what. I live in a developing country and the problem we have here is as a result of bad government.

They never provide jobs for the people, they never invest in talents, and they keep on embezzling money. When the leaders are bad then the country will be bad, but when the leaders are good, you will see the country doing just fine. That’s because they are the ones who control everything that happens in the country.

Actually it shouldn't be like this. In a truly democratic society it's people, or citizens, if you will, are those who control everything. All deeds of the government, with the exception of those concerning national security, have to be transparent so that people could evaluate their government's actions, and either support or renounce them accordingly. It's when you are living under dictatorship you can only hope that the government will be nice to you, in democratic countries they must be nice to their people.

Yeah, reality can really be a b***h. I have been to some part of African countries and you would really be surprised at the level at which they are far behind in technology, since there is no access and it is even more like they have been abandoned to the stone age they are still living in, but in the real sense, it is just awareness that is lacking for a whole lot of their youths anyway.

Truly, it would be hard for places like this to quickly develop with technology since virtually the population of the poor ones keep increasing than the enlightened elites or working class and talking about Eastern Europe and that is even for a developed country, I guess that even explains it all.

And there's also the people's benefits. Education, health care and other basic necessities are quite provided by a properly governed developed country while those needs are pretty difficult to acquire if you're from a still developing country.

In developed countries, people are not afraid for their near future and are confident in the next day, as well as in a decent pension.

This is true but for this that country need to be in good economical and industrial prospect for one. If this two major characteristic are applied then no one need to be worried about it.

The main difference between developed and developing countries is that developed nations are more industrialised and more over per capita income is higher in developed countries. Secondly Human development index is less in developing countries.

Don't be so sure they take the money from the developed countries to the developing ones as some people already gave up hope for their country right from the onset and when they realized how life should really be like in developed countries.

Yeah, we may have some, but all in all, as long as the economy is good for a developed country, whoever is migrating to such country would always be a part of the growth since one way or the other, they will still have to be rendering value to get paid anyway. The problem with developing countries balls down from the government and as long as we get to see people who will keep siphoning what belongs to the development of a country, there will always be a lag.

The difference between developed and developing countries is based on economic status such as GDP, GNP, per capita income, industrialization, technology, infrastructure, living standards, etc.
The problem faced by developing countries in economic development is the problem of limited employment. The problem of unemployment arises because there is an imbalance between the number of labor force and the number of jobs available. This is usually the case because the country in question is undergoing a transition period of changing the economic structure of an agrarian country into an industrial country.

in developed countries, wages are much higher than in developing countries. so many industries are transferred to developing countries, where labor is much cheaper. as a result, the enterprise saves on workers and receives superprofits .

I don't think it is just about employment. I think it is the wholistic well being of a country as a whole for you to be able to call yourself a developed country. I mean if jobs are the only basis, then almost all the countries will be considered developed. It's a matter of a country taking care of its citizens.

It's not up to us to decide whether to call a country developed or developing one. There are trusted institutions doing that job taking many factors into account, and we can see the results in Wikipedia, for example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Developed_country

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Developing_country

Regarding jobs, it's not that there are less jobs in less developed countries, but the problem is that they pay so little that you simply can't survive on your salary alone.

Of course it is not only about the employment opportunities and about how many people are employed. It is about the living standard of a country and its total domestic and national products, the scale of its exports of the goods and services and human development index.

There is a huge list to it. Even a countries per capital income does not tell the exact scenario for there can be unequal distribution of wealth as well. If on the average, the living standard of the people of a country is improving, the country is developing.

No wonder the unemployment rate in developed countries is very small because you can easily get a job there, because there are many small or large industries that need employees, while in developing countries, industry is still very limited many unemployed and daily income is very small

we can consider a nation that is well developed by looking at its employment rate and how they are open for foreign country that has an investment in their country, if a country is not open or globally incompetent, there is no way we can consider them as a developed country, we can also look at the inflation rate and the status of their stock market. developing country perse are the one that has the potential to grow and has potential for accommodating foreign investors.

Yes and somehow developed countries are countries with economies that have high growth and security when looking at the gross domestic product, per capita income, and general standard of living, among other factors. While developing countries sit just below developed countries which is yes, they are these countries who are welcoming foreign investors and are opening doors to have a grow with the aide of foreign investors.

In my opinion, a developed country is a country in which the economy is well developed. These include a developed infrastructure, industry, a high standard of living of the population and its income, GDP. In a developing country all these factors are only developing or are sufficiently low, and this is already clear from the name.

 As I see in developed countries the environment around people made for their comfort from good roads for all kind of transport and people as well to social politic of the government. Of course salaries in such countries are on a high level and allow people to live their life comfortably and even travel abroad. In developing countries the government and people just make an effort to look like developed country. Yes, some people live very nice in developing countries too, but anyway the most of people live very poor.

Not only that, in a developed country if you lose your job it is relatively easy to find a new one that pays you an amount of money that was close to your previous job, but losing your job in a country that is still developing can be a disaster for a family, if you want to find a job relatively soon you will have to accept less money but if you wait for the right opportunity you will probably be unemployed for months.

Another part I did like to point out is the  area of the basic needs which is really lacking in the developing countries; I know governments in the developed countries are well structured/organized to have the data of all the citizens and providing the basic needs and social amenities for its country. The developing countries' citizens have to fend for themselves and provide these basic needs even from the meagre earnings they make! The difference between the developed and the developing countries is quite a far end from each other.

Develop countries are more advance in technologies. They can response immediately to the needs of their people. And their military power are so strong and they weapons are more advance. Not like developing countries. They just rely on their allies to help them and give them some military weapons.

Developed countries are more developed than developing countries but if these developed countries will sleep and will not engaged in new technological advancement, they might be equaled by developing countries who embrace technological advancement like the blockchain as its economy will be boosted by it.

The difference is so big that it may be scary to you. For example, social welfare, the low-income of Africans with world aid is still poor, and the United States and China donate a lot of money each year is still the richest country.

Some of the developing countries too have strong military forces and many of the developed countries even don't have military forces or nuclear weapons so it doesn't make the difference between the developed and developing countries.
That is why we call them as developed countries but what make such difference from both of the countries is their political surroundings and the chance of making money for their citizen yes so it means they don't have employment right?!

The main cause of the difference is the amount GDP per one citizen - it is 20 times lower than in developed countries, reaching up to 100 times in some countries (mainly African countries).
This is tied to lower lever of healthcare development, hygiene and environment pollution and further leads to high crime level and dependence on the developed countries.

I think the differences between of it is that developed countries refers to the sovereign state, whose economy has highly progressed and possesses great technological infrastructure, as compared to other countries than developing countries which is in process of their growth or is a country which has a slow rate of industrialization and low per capita income.

I think it is more of if the people that a specific country has access to their basic needs at a higher scale than most countries. For example, everyone could have a hut and a blackboard and call it a school, but few actually becomes competitive globally. A developed country would definitely have it's citizens taken care of not the otherway around.

Developed countries should dominate the world economy and they are, in fact, doing that. They have a stable economical and technical growth, political power, and high education level among masses. These are the basic things that define developed countries.

The developed countries are already developed and the money to be made from them is quite small. However the developing countries are still there for the profits, if you invest into health business in Nigeria and own many hospitals in the end you might end up profiting for the long term, if you try that on USA its not going to be as cheap or as easy to start doing that let alone keep doing it.

Basically investing in developing countries is easier, it both helps the country and makes you profits in the long term. Already developed countries do not need your help at all so you can't really rely on them to profit.

Literally GDP is the reason why we call them as developed and developing countries but what are the factors that make such difference in GDP on those countries.Some of the developing countries have higher education level when compared to developed nations but they are still working for pennies which means unemployment tho.In developed countries where the cost of living is high so if we start a business in those places we need huge capital and lot of legal verification but in the developing nations they will allows people to own any business because their government can make some revenue but it is also not good for the developing nations since their countries talent and profits were going for someone's country.

Developed countries are countries that are up to date in social amenities such as (internet), the percentage of the educated is more, infrastructural facilities, and are still meeting up with the needs of the citizens. Developing countries. Well! May be country that are just picking up with development. Probably described to be behind.

People haven't pointed out yet that developed countries have higher net migration rates as well as these countries also have considerable amounts of overseas workers working in their country. This only show that developed countries even though they have higher cost of living their income still covers it up and still have something left to be sent back to their families in their country of origin. The main factor for them to move to another country if of course better chances of being employed to a well paying job and they are right about that, some countries' minimum wage is even higher compared to what mid-level executives are being paid in some developing countries, this only show how better wages are in developed countries.

This can be fall under the category of employment,in developing countries there is not enough jobs and even the current job is paid with less money than in developed country.More migrates are happening also because of better standard of living so the people who have enough money to establish their life in the developed countries will move their.

We can all know that Developed Countries had established their Economy. that Includes the employment rate, a lot of Investors and Businesses. Good Education and many more. and developing Countries are still finding their way to resolve any issues in their Country. For sure that many of Us already know the differences.

In developed countries almost all the infrastructures had already been put in place thus facilitates smooth running of the economy whereas in developing countries all these are in non existence or rather are being built thus it invariably leads  to poor growth of the economy and economy activities will be at the lowest ebb.

Countries accentuate on further development therefore they explore new technologies for more efficient work in which they can get maximum benefit and to avoid extra usage if money. Now, countries where the new technological system exists are on the way of further improvement while those countries where the modernism is not entered yet are still on the same position.

If a country is not develop technologically, that is lack  good infrastructure, Availability of electricity, Provision of basic human need for citizen, this will have an a negative impact on the development of such country,Unemployment is as a result of basic amenities which tends to reduce the numbers of industries and organization that comes to a country.

There are many factors that discriminates developed countries from developing countries. for instance per capital income, education ratio, standard of life, law and order, strong organizations and departments, democracy and many other things. In developing countries people face many financial problems and they cannot save money for their future.

Yeah it is also right and I think that in developing countries basic needs for lie are not available or in very rare conditions. The governments in developing countries also do not care for their people and the people too cannot stand for their rights. The whole system disbursed due to weak law enforcement and corruption. People have many financial problems and limited resources. 

What you are saying is one of the most important reasons of why those countries remain at the top, they bring people from other countries that are very smart and that have accumulated a lot of knowledge and they improve their society thanks to them, while the countries that are still developing cannot pay them enough or cannot use their skills at their full capacity.

There are so many inequalities and differences between developed and developing countries in terms of the economy and the way of life of their citizens. You're right if the per capita income of every person in developed countries can reach $3000 every month just for ordinary employees, in developing countries only paid $80 per month, obviously the difference is..

I think its just a same. Developing and developed country is still growing country or emerging country. I am agree that employment will increase people standart life and with job, peoples earn money to fill their need and it will make economic activity run and government earn taxes from that activity

If we talk about the difference between the developed and developing nations, there are lots of differences but the most important and prime difference is the impact of technology on the growth of the economy which is more visible in case of developed countries and least prominent in developing countries. The impact of technology was also depicted by Slow in his famous Slow Growth Model which won Nobel Prize.

The developed countries are the nations with has already a more advance technologies in their countries and the economy is booming and continue to growing fast, while the developing countries are finding ways and means ,like new technogy yo help develop their countries and the economy is not yet very stable ,but so are developing,

These developing countries, sometimes we don’t really have to blame what people are doing there. You just have to blame their government. Majority of the leaders in developing countries are criminals and they never focus on doing something good for their country, rather they are only interested in their own pocket and their family riding private jets and latest cars. If their leaders would change and put more effort in building these countries, then they will change for the better.

Yes probably. It is the poverty rate that differs. And also when we talk about the economy, the imports and exports, the rate of unemployed and most especially the poverty rate. But when we talk about bitcoin, in it for a connection, we could probably say that the developed countries are not afraid to engaged im using bitcoin.

I don’t think there is any country with enough job? If there is, then there shouldn’t be beggars on the street or those people too lazy or what?  I live in a developing country and finding a job is a very difficult thing. In fact, going to school now seems like a total waste of time, since majority of graduates never get a job after their education. It’s only those that has connections that can easily get a job.

Economic conditions and GDP are factors that distinguish between developed and developing countries. Economic gaps between countries around the world are increasingly short-lived and are now the stage when developing countries grow strongly.

the level of corruption and justice is usually very different in both countries where in one the corruption is made openly in any place of work

Of course, developed countries will have a stronger economy than developing countries. Therefore, e-money in developed countries is much more invested. They boldly get rich and accept the risks that may occur. In Japan, UK electronic money is very developed.

You can really see the difference of developed and developing countries when it comes to the technology. Both countries may be able to use cryptocurrency but still there is a difference as to the adoption and the amount of investors that are in it.

There is a tendency that in devloped countries, they can easily shift to electronic money or cryptocurrency because they can do so as almost everyone can have access to it whereas when it comes to developing countries, people are even struggling when connecting to the network.

There are many differences between developed and developing countries. I am living in a developing country and I have also seen developed countries and observed the differences in law enforcement, government policies, and financial positions of the people, per capital income and many other things. There is a huge difference in life standards of both the countries.

What are Developed Countries?

Developed countries refer to the countries who have already got massive development with terms to their economy, education, employment, sense of security.
EX . Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, United States, France, Germany, and Italy.

What are Developing Countries?

Developing countries refers to the countries which are under process regarding development.  Their GDP, per capita income level is far more than the poverty countries, and at the same time it is far low from the developed countries.
EX . India, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Turkey.

The developing countries help the develop countries on the employment. They employed individuals coming from a developing country for them to give a low salary but with the same efficiency as the other employee coming from their country. Most of the good employee are migrating to other country just to work and get higher salary compared to the salary that could be given to them in the their own developing country.

Developed countries should dominate the world economy and they are, in fact, doing that. They have a stable economical and technical growth, political power, and high education level among masses. These are the basic things that define developed countries.

Many countries developed but they are still looking for more or you can say further development and success by exploring new ways to make things easy and they may benefit more for maximum outcomes. On the other hand those countries which are under developed do not find it easy to accept the new innovations which is decentralized too so they will take some time to proceed for crypto modernism.

The big difference in developed and developing countries is this that the people of developing countries cannot rise for their rights because the government will push them back and the ruling party acts like kings and assumes that this country is their own property and they will do what they want to do. People receive no basic facilities of life and lives in worst conditions.

For me developed countries are those where every person are earning money and there government providing jobs to unemployed where developing countries are those where all are under construction there economy are recovering and taking some times

I think bitcoin can helps to recover and improving the economy. Bitcoin provides some ways where unemployed people can work and make good income.

The income difference is the main reason of why many professional from third world countries try to find jobs outside their countries, however that inequality in the payments does not come only from the difference in the size of the economies of those countries, many business in those countries know they can away with paying such low salaries because they know people are desperate to work and will do it for almost any price.

Developed countries have better education, less illiteracy, higher levels of labor, longer life expectancy, and more government policies.

in addition, life happiness index, opportunity, human rights, health care, animal right, nature conservation, number of high intelligence citizen per ca pita, national security, etc etc.

developed countries always prioritize technology and the community is always brave to try new things, including in terms of investment. while developing countries still believe in ancient things and still adhere to an old-fashioned investment system. they are slow to keep up with the times.

The employment rate is one of the most important social welfare in developed countries, such as insurance and medical care. It is very difficult for developing countries to achieve full name free medical care. But this only takes time.

For me, developed countries are countries with high per capita income and low unemployment rates. This is because all economic resources can be utilized optimally. While developing countries have low per capita income of their population. The condition of the country's economy which is still developing causes a narrow employment field so that the unemployment rate in developing countries is quite high.

Of course there is a big difference between developed nation and developing nation, developed nation will have evedenced if you have to visit in that country because good infrastructure like high rise building, upgrade transportation and lots of employment are samples of developed country which is consistent good economy. were as developing country is more additional invention build, many future prospect investment come up and make sure the economic growth of governace.

The developed countries are the countries which are using the advanced technology, in which this countries are economically stable and with a good standing worldwide , while the developing countries are those who are yet to adopt the modern dau technology , this developing countries are mostly the third world countries.

I think that is also distinguishable by natural resources and education. In the United States they have a great educational policy and always let students experience the most practical things. But in Asian countries, almost all students are taught only theory and not practiced. It is also a disadvantage for developing countries.

Developed underdevelopment is actually relative, and determining whether a country is developed or not depends on the productivity level of a country.
The main reason is that developed countries have taken the lead in completing industrialization, and the overall level of productivity is high, and this level is still rising.

Furthermore, developing countries are consuming nations simply because industrialization is on the low, therefore they import virtually all other amenities of life even food while developed nations are industrialised with all sectors of the economy optimised for production.

Not really? Because the third world countries like Indonesia and India are haing all the industries in their country and exporting some goods to the other countries but why still they were developing countries?Maybe those countries have high industries on number but they are not enough in terms of quality to exported that is why they are just used by themselves.

Well, there are major differences between developed countries and developing countries but let us start off with the obvious one. The former one means it already reached its well-developed stage while the latter one means it's still on its way to become fully-develop. To further explain its sense, let's give some exemplification. First, one major difference is the economic status of the countries. Their economy defines how well they country perform. It includes then the business performances. Second, the employment rate. The employment rate shows how productive their people is and at the same time, how well do the citizens of their country can provide for their own family. Finally, how well do they utilize their natural amd other resources as main part of their developed and developing status as a nation.

The distinct difference between developed and developing countries is the quality of life of the people. In developed countries, the quality of life of people with higher education services and people are better educated, they have access to modern technology but it seems that the environment here is also in the direction of umbrella more infected with the development of technology

I think it ia more in a sense of the level of comfort that the people of a country is experiencing. This would include access to basic needs such as food, shelter, medicine, education and so on. It would also contribute to the opportunity a country gives to its people. I guess it is more like how close is it that people could be comfortable in a country.

Yeah that is the most visible indicator, the number of people who employment and unemployment, why is the country still developing? because a lot of their people's economy is still low, one reason is because they don't have jobs. You're right that health benefits in developed countries are really good, different from developing countries..

In the developing countries the Government official that suppose to create the enabling environment for companies and industries that will bring about employment for the citizens to strive, they are busy stealing the money meant for development, that is why most of those countries are in the same level year after year.

This is true but one thing that makes all the difference in the world is that more developed countries have less corruption in all levels of society, this is critical because corruption makes all those problems even worse than they are, if poor countries had good governments then they could eventually improve and get out of that state but governments do everything in their power to keep people poor to keep the power to themselves.

In the development, they have enough opportunity to find work for leading a happy life and most of the development country are using bitcoin. On the other hand, on the developing countries, they have no opportunity to get a good job and it is a great regret that there crypto currency is not legal. It is really painful for the unemployed people on developing countries.

I dont agree with OP as Developed nation means it got developed and now their is nothing to develop so how cum their is lot of job opportunity in the developed nation. Developing country will have more job opportunity as it is now getting developed and for that it needs lot of tasks and work to be finished so it means their are lot of job opportunity as more projects to develop means more job to finish to project. So it means that developing country have potential then of developed cuntry.

well development country there has a lot to do, much in infrastructure that can make a benifit for country itself. because of lack of it that can make high unemployment, low education needed for work and for human develop itself.

It is similar with a big company who wins a big project and the little companies who actually do the job.

There are so many dynamics with which you can easily see the difference between developed and developing countries like GDP of the countries, the GDP per capita, Living standard and literacy rate or education. These basic dynamics determine how much a country is developed.

If a country had low ratio of educated people, it just cannot cross the Rostow’s stage of development and cannot become developed so these certain indicators are very crucial in studying the difference between developed and developing countries.

Well, comfort is just one thing that could only happen when some things are sorted out first. In this case, we are talking about employment rate, infrastructures, daily living of an average person and so on. Developed countries are far different in all these aspects to developing countries and all balls down from the leadership. Also, there are some things you will get to see in the system when it comes to accountability and transparency, which is one thing that is lacking in most developing countries, and one of the reasons why they have been more prone to corrupt practices.

Sure thing! You know when you create an enabling environment for companies and industries to thrive, you get to create more jobs, and the unemployment rate dropping, people get to do well for themselves, the level of poverty reduces, which in the same vein also reduces the level of criminal activities and we get to see an improvement generally in such an economy. It is actually the economy generally that makes the difference between the developed and developing countries, and it all has to do with their level of approach to a whole lot of things when it comes to development in general.

Developed countries are countries where people's welfare is high, such as health, education, facilities provided by the state, communication and technology, making it easily accessible because it is provided by the state. While developing countries are places where the state is still at the level of providing better facilities for its citizens, because the characteristics of developing countries in the field of health and education are still lacking, because all costs are high so not all citizens are capable. Developing countries per capita income is still small.

Lol employment is never been enough,because even in the most powerful and most developed countries has bystanders or homeless,meaning job opening is not for all their peoples.i have been into many countries and all i can say everything is the same about employments,the only difference is there are some countries that governments are corrupt thats why the allocated budget for development comes directly to their pocket and not to the people needs

Definitely when a country is already progressing and is being counted in Developed countries list then it will start coping up to new emerging technologies. Lets suppose a third world country, they have so big economical and other issues so how can they manipulate there legislation for bitcoin rather to work on providing basic facilities and raising their economy.

Actually the basic differences between a developed and developing countries could be mined in details upon looking at some of the determinants that are chosen by the WDI for its analyses. The first being the GDP per capital which is very important and shows the income of every individual in the population. Then it’s the living standard which makes you developed in long run if it is good. Education and health is important and these determinants are always positive for a developed country and the opposite could be said for a developing one.