Bitcoin Forum

I was pointed by someone :) to zero value one line "ladder" posts bringing nothing valuable to conversation, mostly spammed by newbies/junior member/shill accounts bumping thread on average more or less 80 times a day.

Here are few examples:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1307669;sa=showPosts  http://archive.is/N8FRg
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1473436;sa=showPosts  http://archive.is/eOFhj
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1191280;sa=showPosts  http://archive.is/ErZGF
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1713702;sa=showPosts  http://archive.is/tIEvn
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2222309;sa=showPosts  http://archive.is/iZjj5
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2222380;sa=showPosts  http://archive.is/C6BBC

Bumping with alt accounts:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1607069;sa=showPosts  http://archive.is/5RU23
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2006547;sa=showPosts  http://archive.is/xAztN
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2396551;sa=showPosts  http://archive.is/znaqP#selection-927.123-927.124


Can moderator check this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4997711.0 ?

Soon this kind of behaviour will be spotted in real time and reported automatically while-it-happen, there are plans undergoing. Then is just matter for the moderation to decide what to do about it.

Bitcoin is irreversible.  You won't find too many who give second chances to people that choose to "ask forgiveness instead of permission".  :/

How do you know his parents weren't married?

One thing that I can surely conclude ( ???) :
This Noob is Angry ;)

Instead of saying sorry for what he has done,... he has a lot more grudge for getting  a negative trust...
He didn't even know that giving feedbacks here doesn't require a notice for you to be informed that someone will give you for doing wrong deeds.

Pal, before joining on a bounty better make sure that you've studied their bio/s and carefully look for any feedbacks regarding those bounties. You should be aware of these things before joining them. There won't be an excuse if you got caught just like what happened to you right now.

There you go, you just broke another rule (32) in the forum.


Read the rules, people.

Obviously you don't know how the feedback system works.

Your negative trusts shows to everyone because you got tagged by a DT2

You have no trust status so the negative does not show to anyone else but you.

I don't know what you are saying but your trust score is    -2: -1 / +0

Which means you are untrustworthy person for trading and even most of the bounties won't accept you anymore.

(Didn't snip, I feel like being lazy right now)
I think clicking the link will be the answer.
And I think that he is reffering to marlboroza having negative trust on that image. But as we look on marlboroza's profile he has a +10 trust score.

And an addition, he was tagged for being a spammer and bumping advertising a campaign that based on marlboroza it was indeed a scam.

No - that is only what you see.

This is what I see:
https://i.imgur.com/gDMakrc.png
https://i.imgur.com/QRm0Dpx.png

Your feedback is untrusted so only displays to you and people that specifically trust you.  Marlborozas feedback is default trusted so is shown to everyone.

I see a grudge here, I don't blame who is right and who is wrong,
"But I see this statement clearly you are wrong, there has been a ban, but you ignore it, you can see this statement:
It's very clear why you got all this:

---

👉[Topic: Writing a welcome message] (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5036308.0)

---

Launa Trade (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2194687)

---

👉marlboroza (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=787736)[Referensi]Advertising exposed scam ICO(Aircraft) after warning, user is helping scammers to steal money from community]
 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4935352.340)

---

👉Link: http://archive.is/WwLnu

I think that ICOs promoting this practice should be negged, there is no chance that somebody would spend so much time bumping somebody else's thread if they were not employed to do so by the ICO or company behind the ANN. There needs to be a way of warning the users that the activity is not a true indicator of interest, but instead artificial activity designed to put out the illusion of popularity, very shady indeed.

Is there a reason these OPs don't get negged?

I don't see how my sexual life fits in this topic  :)

---

Several reasons. Competition, bumping service, investors, bounty hunters spamming one topic. My logic is telling me this is.... ::)

I still think this is something moderator should look at. They are basically doing this(it works for every ICO):

(I made this conversation and someone should count this as 6 posts for signature campaign  ;D)

This is example of real one:

Now, that is spam.

---

Editing this. This is much better "spam ladder" example:

If you are interest few months ago I did one topic about this problem, some accounts seems to be sold now but if you look their old reports you probably will find this bumping thing.

Here the link  Bumping ico-bounty service allowed? 69 accounts involved so far.  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3063184.0)