Bitcoin Forum

Many of the bounty hunters, ICO investors must be thinking that now a days there are no hopes from the newly formed projects. However I believe that projects who are launching the MVP's which is called as Minimum Viable Product in which there snapshot of beta versions available for using. By using this people can actually go on trading, buying, selling , lending etc etc according to the project idea and thus get feel for what the project is all about. Thus, many of them can trust that this project is real one as they are showing their potential of growth. I guess such projects are always grand success and must be focused on to invest out money.
What are your suggestion on it.

It is indeed an advantage to invest or join a bounty with MVP launched beforehand but that does not mean that the project will be a success nor that the project will not turn into a scam.  Scammers are getting wiser every day, they are able to adapt to what is the trend today.  Aside from that, there are also several projects that have their MVP available but failed to meet their soft cap.  Having an MVP is an advantage but does not guarantee a 100% success of their ICO.

It's indeed an advantage to invest or join a bounty with MVP launched beforehand but that doesn't mean that the project will be a success nor that the project will not turn into a scam. Having an MVP is an advantage but doesn't guarantee a 100% success of their ICO.

Some ico have even created fully working products. Basically MVP will give more guarantee to the investors because they can become the tester and then try the MVP. that will give them all a lot of experience and insight about what will be created by this ico. basically if can push the popularity.

That is somehow true. In anything for business, the products with minimum viability have the most demand. And the products are bought and sold quickly too. So, in a unpredictable and easy earning method, the demand ought to be more.

Whoever is now investing in a project has nothing to present yet even at the beginning of the ICO is taking a risk that is obvious. I do not believe in promise and fail. You do not promise when there is no proof of at least a working MVP. We have even  reached a point where some projects have almost completed the product, but are just  looking forward to take it to an advanced stage.

While having MVP gives you an advantage but it doesn't gurantee the 100% success of their ICO. While there is an advantage to investing or joining a bounty with MVP launched prior but doesn't mean the project will succeed or turn out to be a scam. At the same time scammers are becoming more adept at following the trends of the market. As there are a lot of projects with MVP available that can't even reach their soft cap. Maybe in time the problems we have now will change and having MVP will allow actual advantages but for now we'll have to deal with how it is.

Not just more attentios, but also more lured investors will come to invest. MVP in a project coin is very much appreciated by most investors because with this they tend to gamble or rake risk.

This MVP is indeed something that is gaining the attention of more people. As this feature is helping people to realize the potential of the projects, more people are getting interested in the projects. However, MVP does not ensure the complete success of the project.

to buy coins when presale is indeed a big potential profit that we will get. but that can cause a big risk if the project is a scam. can not do anything about it.

because of MVP, investors can receive more guarantees on the actual project implementation. It helps the project making more concrete. But that doesn't mean we can trust those projects blindly.

Of course, those projects that have a beta version or MVP of a product have more confidence and chances to attract attention and funds from investors, but this does not guarantee the success of its development in the future, because fraudsters are very agile and inventive and they can fake anything. We always need to be extremely careful when choosing a project.

I agree with, mvp is one of the most important thing in ICO. Bu as for me, it's better when the project has a soft cap and strong community.

Minimum Viable Product = MVP, "Minimum" so is one factor who will make success of an ICO. From the MVP we can see how a project will be in the future and of course this will attract more investors. But MVP does not guarantee an ICO will be successfu, ateast investors can see the products that will be offered from a project. So I agree with you MVP is an important thing from an ICO, but the rest depends on marketing capabilities and other things to make an ico succes.

I am very grateful to the author for what he says in his topic. Indeed, projects with MVP always deserve much more attention, and have much more prospects than those that have only a bare idea.

MVP-Minimum Viable Product, is a product that will create faith on the investors to make investment in a new project.
It is another item, for example, a web or application planned with just the adequate, or least, highlights expected to test the application in the correct market and increase early enthusiasm from clients and purchasers. When the conceptualized web or portable application is planned and tried, client input from the analyzers is useful in making the last full component item and for including extra highlights. A MVP ought to be an item that makes an incentive for the general population who will utilize it and contain center highlights as it were.

Beginning with a MVP enables you to perceive how your web or portable application will pick up notoriety with a group of people of clients before investing extra energy and cash including every one of the highlights. On the off chance that the MVP falls flat, you can stop improvement and generation before squandering any additional time and cash on an item that won't pick up footing with your shoppers.

Planning a straightforward MVP takes essentially less time than structuring a whole web or versatile application with an arrangement of completely stacked highlights. It additionally keeps you from planning highlights that won't profit your clients.

Yes it does become a success, but not till scammers catch up with a way for them to be doing something similar and making people believe them too. Scammers are really wise these days and are using different techniques to approach people and make them fall victim. It only takes being smart to be able to tell when you’re about to get scammed. So be careful, don’t trust any of them just because of that.

the reason why ICOs stopped being as successful as before is that people simply stopped gambling with them because they got scammed enough times and also saw the eventuality that awaits all of the ICO tokens that they no longer want to be involved with them. and that was bound to happen anyways and the 2018 dumps only made it happen faster.
things like Minimum Viable Product may help them a little bit but it is not the fool proof guarantee for making the ICO succeed like before. people don't have any faith in them.

The presence of MVP in a project at the ICO stage does not guarantee that it will necessarily become successful, but this is definitely a positive thing that forces one to pay attention to the project. But it is worth remembering that there are many interesting projects that are not having a MVP deserve attention due to a strong team that is able to ensure the success of the project. You should always take a comprehensive approach to evaluating a project before investing in it.

Of course, the presence of MVP always has a positive effect on the project. This is not the only thing worth paying attention to, but the MVP shows the team’s intentions to work and develop the project. It also shows that the team has financial resources, because now many teams launch ICO without financial resources and this becomes an obstacle, for example, to promote their ICO on social networks, to attend forums and conferences, even in order to competently make a presentation. 

I fully agree with you and fortunately now many projects have begun to do just that and already have customers who initially support projects, it’s a pleasure to participate in such projects. Let's hope that all projects will do just that!

I think if one or more project can use MVP and they can get success with that, I am sure that MVP will become a new trend of the project and it will make the other project will change their vision and mission. The trend of the ICO is finished, but I am sure that there will be a new model of the ICO that will attract more investor to come to the project. I think in the next year, there is something new from the ICO and it makes people join in the project again, and they can make a lot of profit like before.