|
Title: Probably Merit Abuse by Legendary Member (robelneo) Post by: Bitinity on February 27, 2019, 11:19:11 PM Profile link: robelneo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=205954)
This user recently sent 4 sMmerit to user Quintrix (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2516055) for this post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5113360.msg49876287#msg49876287) Indeed the post is good and useful for other readers so worth to be merited. What I found is that, the user robelneo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=205954) and Quintrix (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2516055) using the same telegram username while it is impossible to have the same username as other people if I'm not mistaken. As reference robelneo post his telegram username: #Proof Of Authentication archived (https://archive.is/COzKC)Campaign : blog campaign Bitcointalk username : robelneo Telegram Username: @robelneo wallet Nem : NC3MRQ-2H7PK5-ORKSZZ-YNXKWC-HWZLMS-4H4QR7-NALK While Quintrix use the same telegram username as robelneo on the telegram group of Stake's Signature campaign as shown on below image https://i.imgur.com/D0W4gy0.png In order: Number-Telegram username-Bitcointalk Username-Stake's username Sorry I have no right to share the spreadsheet of the stake signature campaign. So probably stevestake can confirm about this. P.S : @robelneo and @Quintrix : if what I post is incorrect then kindly give your explanation. If it does not prove that you both are alts, I'll glad to delete this topic. Thanks Title: Re: Probably Merit Abuse by Legendary Member (robelneo) Post by: SteveStake on February 27, 2019, 11:44:37 PM Quintrix, you're disqualified unless you can explain this.
Title: Re: Probably Merit Abuse by Legendary Member (robelneo) Post by: mdayonliner on February 28, 2019, 03:31:09 AM What I found is that, the user robelneo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=205954) and Quintrix (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2516055) using the same telegram username while it is impossible to have the same username as other people if I'm not mistaken. Let's say xyz is my telegram username or any other social handle. If someone else post it from their account then will that make me guilty? Same happened with me long ago but with my twitter account. Someone else posted my twitter username in this forum from their account. But that did not proved that the forum account was mine.Anyway, I hope that robelneo will show up and explain it batter. Quintrix, you're disqualified unless you can explain this. We don't know yet who owns the telegram username.Title: Re: Probably Merit Abuse by Legendary Member (robelneo) Post by: Bitinity on February 28, 2019, 03:47:32 AM What I found is that, the user robelneo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=205954) and Quintrix (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2516055) using the same telegram username while it is impossible to have the same username as other people if I'm not mistaken. Let's say xyz is my telegram username or any other social handle. If someone else post it from their account then will that make me guilty? Same happened with me long ago but with my twitter account. Someone else posted my twitter username in this forum from their account. But that did not proved that the forum account was mine.Anyway, I hope that robelneo will show up and explain it batter. In this case, robelneo posted the username many times already especially at the Bounties (Altcoins Board). Logically he is the real owner of the username. On other hand, Quintrix did not post it, but it is through PM to Steve as it is a requirement once Steve accept participant on his campaign. What is the purpose of Quintrix using robelneo's username for communication purpose of the campaign? If he is using username which is not his own username, how can he track any progress of the campaign? By asking robelneo because maybe they are close friend/family/roommate? Obviously I hope one of them or better both of them come to this thread to clarify and explain? |
