|
Title: 68 flags need support ( Digital Goods Scammers ) Post by: mikeywith on June 15, 2019, 01:17:04 PM Thanks to the new system we now have to do extra work to alert newbies and guests, not the biggest fan of all the time and efforts needed to create 68 flags, but I did it anyway :-\
Below is a list of flags , basically from 134 all the way to 203 excluding 160 which is for marlboroza's flag (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=160) against bitconnectcoin ( please support that one too) Sorry about the formatting, I am not very familiar with the bbcode plus I am kinda slow ( took me forever to make the flags , copy paste the links ) it would take a me month to link each flag to it's user, but overall, the list below is simply taken from my topic A list of top scammers on the " Digital Goods " market. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3486346.msg36123932#msg36123932) Thanks to Sandy-is-fine for helping me keep the list updated, and to LoyceV who bbcoded the list to look that way. **I used a single topic as flag-explanations because the rules states Quote If you flag many users, you can create a single flag-explanations topic. 1- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=134 2- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=135 3- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=136 4- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=137 5- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=138 6- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=139 7- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=140 8- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=141 9- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=142 10- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=143 11- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=144 12- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=145 13- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=146 14- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=147 15- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=148 16- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=149 17- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=150 18- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=151 19- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=152 20- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=153 21- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=154 22- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=155 23- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=156 24- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=157 25- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=158 26- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=159 27- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=161 28- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=162 29- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=163 30- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=164 31- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=165 32- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=166 33- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=167 34- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=168 35- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=169 36- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=170 37- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=171 38- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=172 39- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=173 40- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=174 41- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=175 42- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=176 43- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=177 44- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=178 45- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=179 46- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=180 47- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=181 48- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=182 49- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=183 50- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=184 51- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=185 52- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=186 53- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=187 54- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=188 55- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=189 56- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=190 57- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=192 58- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=193 59- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=194 60- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=195 61- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=196 62- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=197 63- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=198 64- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=199 65- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=200 66- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=201 67- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=202 68- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=203 Title: Re: 68 flags need support ( Digital Goods Scammers ) Post by: marlboroza on June 15, 2019, 01:59:43 PM Supported first 40 will do other accounts later. I figured that it would be easier to link account's trust pages because they have tags and flags visible and it would spare some supporting or not supporting flags.
Title: Re: 68 flags need support ( Digital Goods Scammers ) Post by: LoyceV on June 15, 2019, 02:50:54 PM Sorry about the formatting, I am not very familiar with the bbcode plus I am kinda slow ( took me forever to make the flags , copy paste the links ) it would take a me month to link each flag to it's user It took me over an hour :D Enjoy: http://loyce.club/trust/flags/BBCode/7.txtSmall preview: Quote 2019-06-15 Sat 16.36h source: loyce.club (http://loyce.club/trust/flags/7.html) 134 Active. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=134) mikeywith (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2033515) flagged senamcikbenamcik (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2572817) (see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3486346.0)). Supported by marlboroza (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=787736), mikeywith (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2033515). Opposed by nobody. 135 Active. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=135) mikeywith (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2033515) flagged GiftCardWorld25 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2570115) (see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3486346.0)). Supported by marlboroza (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=787736), mikeywith (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2033515). Opposed by nobody. 136 Active. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=136) mikeywith (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2033515) flagged LetishasRogers Giftcards (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2569524) (see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3486346.0)). Supported by marlboroza (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=787736), mikeywith (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2033515). Opposed by nobody. 137 Active. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=137) mikeywith (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2033515) flagged GiftCardPalace (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2569303) (see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3486346.0)). Supported by marlboroza (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=787736), mikeywith (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2033515). Opposed by nobody. 138 Active. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=138) mikeywith (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2033515) flagged PrimalCinder (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2567343) (see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3486346.0)). Supported by marlboroza (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=787736), mikeywith (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2033515). Opposed by nobody. 139 Active. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=139) mikeywith (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2033515) flagged p0ls81n (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2565619) (see why (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3486346.0)). Supported by marlboroza (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=787736), mikeywith (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2033515). Opposed by nobody. For future use, you can find the BBCode in my Trust Flag viewer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153695.0). If you need a quick update for a long list like this, just send me a PM. Otherwise wait for the daily update. Title: Re: 68 flags need support ( Digital Goods Scammers ) Post by: bones261 on June 15, 2019, 04:02:42 PM Supported them all. I wish that I had a clue on how to create a script. That was tedious.
Title: Re: 68 flags need support ( Digital Goods Scammers ) Post by: Hhampuz on June 15, 2019, 04:03:00 PM Took it's sweet time but supported them all. Great job!
Supported them all. I wish that I had a clue on how to create a script. That was tedious. haha, right? Title: Re: 68 flags need support ( Digital Goods Scammers ) Post by: LFC_Bitcoin on June 15, 2019, 05:19:53 PM Supported them all. I wish that I had a clue on how to create a script. That was tedious. Me too, fucking hell that took me a while! Title: Re: 68 flags need support ( Digital Goods Scammers ) Post by: sandy-is-fine on June 18, 2019, 02:49:33 AM Yikes, working on
Edit: Looking back at the original list I see you did eliminate most of the banned ones. :) Title: Re: 68 flags need support ( Digital Goods Scammers ) Post by: mikeywith on June 19, 2019, 09:47:43 PM Edit: Looking back at the original list I see you did eliminate most of the banned ones. :) No sweetheart I did not :-* , ;D someone else flagged those scumbags , actually a flag is still needed even if the user is banned, as far as am concern ,banning a member does not lead to deletion of their posts - so all those " text me on telegram to buy 100$ amaozon gift card for 10$" topics and posts are still there (at least this is what I think, maybe i am wrong, hope someone can confirm this ) and it's unlikely that they have no access to that telegram/email or any off-forum communication channel. so please don't spare any effort in tagging / flagging banned scumbags. Title: Re: 68 flags need support ( Digital Goods Scammers ) Post by: sandy-is-fine on June 20, 2019, 02:08:10 AM Edit: Looking back at the original list I see you did eliminate most of the banned ones. :) No sweetheart I did not :-* , ;D someone else flagged those scumbags , actually a flag is still needed even if the user is banned, as far as am concern ,banning a member does not lead to deletion of their posts - so all those " text me on telegram to buy 100$ amaozon gift card for 10$" topics and posts are still there (at least this is what I think, maybe i am wrong, hope someone can confirm this ) and it's unlikely that they have no access to that telegram/email or any off-forum communication channel. so please don't spare any effort in tagging / flagging banned scumbags. Thanks luv ... got 'em all! xxx ooo Title: Re: 68 flags need support ( Digital Goods Scammers ) Post by: DireWolfM14 on June 20, 2019, 02:36:10 AM Holy cow, Mikey! This must have taken you hours. It's going to take me some time to support all the flags, but I'll go through them. Even though I trust your judgement, I don't feel comfortable supporting the flags without at least finding the reasoning behind them.
Title: Re: 68 flags need support ( Digital Goods Scammers ) Post by: mikeywith on June 29, 2019, 10:23:55 PM Holy cow, Mikey! This must have taken you hours. It's going to take me some time to support all the flags, but I'll go through them. Even though I trust your judgement, I don't feel comfortable supporting the flags without at least finding the reasoning behind them. Well it did take me some time to be honest, was cursing the new flag system all the way ;D , but someone had to do it, those scammers on the digital goods are in my opinion the most dangerous on forum, I do understand your point, in fact I would rather see people validate every flag before supporting it, I could have made a mistake somewhere, you shouldn't be supporting a false flag ;D. Title: Re: 68 flags need support ( Digital Goods Scammers ) Post by: Avirunes on June 30, 2019, 04:07:33 AM Thanks to your last post, this thread came to my radar. I will support all of them. And, also thanks to you and sandy-is-fine for looking after scammers in Digital Good section which is a good and common spot for scammers to hunt for potential victims.
Title: Re: 72 flags need support ( Digital Goods Scammers ) Post by: mikeywith on November 17, 2019, 07:55:55 PM I did some cleaning in the market place (digital goods) below is a list of users whom trading with is a very high risk, the last 3 are probably the same person since they "selling" the same stuff and exchanging merits , the first dude refused to use escrow , some of them are already tagged, all of them hide behind locked/self-moderated topics.
67-https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=990 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=990) 68-https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=991 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=991) 69-https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=992 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=992) 70-https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=993 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=993) |