Bitcoin Forum

There have been a lot of posts questioning the rewards of campaigns in recent time, complaints about dev and team giving fewer rewards for campaigns. Many have eyes but cannot see, what is the use of huge rewards with no value in the future why you can be giving fewer rewards that will grow into something big if you can hodl, I will rather participate in a campaign with less reward and huge prospect than wasting my time overloading my portfolio with useless coins that will take me nowhere. If you really want to benefit from crypto, think less of what any new project can bring you new, think more of what you stand to gain in the future, be part of a good project. Don't be deceived by the promise of huge rewards that will deprive you of the future benefits which quality project can give to you. If you invest your time in good project today, even if the rewards look small, if you can hodl then future is certain. Be ready to sacrifice your today for your tomorrow.

This is not as simple. Users are being involved in a project for months and the tokens generally falls in price when they are listed on the exchange.
There are many reasons why a bounty has large number of participants while some have few. Some do have a cap on number of participants.
The obviously legit project that has no cap for participants number are flooded with bounty hunters.

I think this is a hard decision because this situation is depend with project that our followed. I think less reward with big value is greater because if the coin supply is little but the quality of coins is good, many people will be hunt that.

Everyone are trying to achieve that balance everywhere. The time and effort you put into to get the rewards it's worth.
If you are holding a bounty token after you received it, the holding time is also the time effort you are putting towards the reward.
So everyone should try to achieve the balance and hence ask bounty managers to limit the number of participants.

That's why precision is needed when joining a campaign, because there are campaigns where the price of coins is expensive but the allocation is very little, this is certainly natural if the duration is short, but it would be unnatural if the duration is long it is very cheap, we also have to look at this so that we don't get caught up in a campaign that gives birth to coins that are useless for the future.

simple question but hard to answer.
OK let's see, i think i will choose Less rewards with big value.
i don't really know why i choose it but i think it is better than if you have a big rewards but with less value.
just my speculation.

The Both choices are on the same side of results!for me it doesnt matter if its huge or big or whatsoever the important is we got paid in the decent amount, thats make sense to me or you got a huge number of token as payment but it has no value at all,because it has no usecase and utilization ill take my chances on decent amount.

giving the rewards is only for giving the confidence to to work more and concentrate more about your work and I think if it was giving to a person frequently that will be know impressive thing will happened while giving any work so I think giving good reward in a perfect time is always useful and confident giving.

Are you indirectly saying that those projects that promise huge rewards to bounty participants usually have less value. I think the potentials of a coin does not depend on the bounty allocation but the idea and team behind it.

You are right, it's better to have small reward and later grow to big than having big reward that are worthless, i have leant my lessons in 2018 that bounties with big rewards are likely to be scam though not all.

In participating bounties only hope the project will succeed with successful sales, many investors and successfully listed on a clear exchange. As participants in the bounty campaign, we can only carry out tasks and if appropriate will get results. But we cannot want as we wish, but their rules are project managers. If you want to get something more, namely trading. But one thing you should know, namely the risk of loss. I think you understand.

Some people are not realistic, when a campaign wants to give out millions in reward, that is not realistic, and what most of them do is to disappoint bounty hunters and fail to keep their own side of the arrangement for good projects but for shit coins, they will give out this tokens but won't have any value

We are receiving huge amount of tokens in bounty campaigns but with almost zero value. In last 2 years I didn´t receive any coin that made a significant profit after end of ICO  ;D.

it happened because you came in when the ICO's popularity was almost extinct, if you compare with the heyday of ico before March 2018 then the results you get from campaigns will look satisfying when compared now. At present we only need be passion for bitcoin market reaches new ATH  at the end of 2019 and maybe that will make the tokens value is worthless and it's time for you to party  ;D

Well, then does the low-allocated bounty campaign guarantee that the price will be better? I do not think so. Honestly I can't predict whether a project will succeed or not going forward, so I only analyze and choose the best among the best.
My suggestion is that if you choose a bounty campaign, it is better to choose those who have a fair allocation, of course you already know the reasonable allocation. Well besides that, please analyze yourself for the project you want to follow.

But you can't assure that those less rewards have big value in the future. How can you predict that they will do good in exchanges? Even strong projects are deemed to decline their price after couple of months of trading. And sometimes, they will credit your tokens to your account so many months after the trading has begun. So when you finally get a hold of your tokens or coins, that big value might have depreciated already. So one way or another, still difficult to join token-paying campaigns because the future is cloudy.

It is realistic vs unrealistic, you know why they are giving huge rewards but unreal value? because it will get the attention of most bounty hunters. And everyone wants to earn that much so they're getting in to those that shows on their with huge rewards. But this is the reality, not every project that portrays huge rewards will become into reality because many of them have failed in the past. If I'll join, I'd choose the lesser rewards but with realistic plan and project.

I think the issue involved here is choosing the right project, it's not about huge reward, high reward. Everyone is literally interested in projects that will guarantee maximum profit

It is hard to decide but i think the more the better because when the market was bullish we saw people earning great rewards from bounty campaigns but now the scenario has changed, only a few campaigns pay what they promised others reduce reward and deceive the hunters and worst case is that some icos and campaigns turn out to be scam where hunters never receive any reward.

The rewards are based in the number of tokens of a project, if its a low.number of tokens to be circulated then i would assume that there is a low supply, then the rewards are still low, i would rather prefer small rewards because i would expect a higher value in it when its listed on the exchange.

I am prefer join in campaign with big prospect even its less reward. Big prospect project can give us money when the price rising because investor must be looking big prospect project. Huge reward but can not traded in market is wasting our time

How about less rewards with no value? No matter what bounty hunters do even if the projects offers huge amount of payment or small if the project is fake or scam then it's just a waste of time and effort. For me participating on a bounty now is a game of luck its either you get paid with tokens that has value or you get paid with tokens that will just be a souvenir forever.

I tend to agree.

The strategy to most hunters is to join as many bounty campaigns as they can, they do not really care about the quality. This strategy worked in 2017 and many made good money. Last year, that strategy was a disaster and a waste of time. 

I see project growth and bounty campaigns not as good as 2017. following as many campaigns as possible I don't think it will produce anything. or maybe it will only make a little money. there are not many coins from the new project that can last well on the market. most experience a big decline, and that won't give anything to the bounty hunter.

we have already have all the variations of what you are asking and some more. so i guess you can easily get your answer if you check the fate of each of them. and as you will be able to see, their fate has been exactly the same. they all failed and either died or are slowly dying.
the reason is simple, how you distribute the "reward" and all that does not matter at all. the only thing that matters is the utility that a project offers and none of these things offer any. in other words they are useless and that is why they are dying.

it's not all clear. sometimes coins is really a lot. it happens that for one bounty company you get millions of tokens and they cost nothing, and sometimes you get a few dozen coins and they give a huge value.

Indeed. More reward means the more coins will be sold and makes the price going lower.
I usually not joining campaign from the amount of rewards only, but from the project itself.
Even the huge reward will be useless if the project itself not good.

Holding the counterproductive token will not help the bounty hunters to gain more money with continuing their old bounty hunting activity.  Noone knows what will happen on the market tomorrow but the hazard of the increased market conditions doesn't look good for the uselees team and bounty portals.

What ever it takes in this two options we have to face the reality that we cannot make profits in many of projects existing in cryptocurrency but i have a project that can and this is the Dencoin tokens so must try and make investments.

yeah, but participated in bounty campaign or investing in any crypto project is same
wich mean we must choose carefully and do our best research before doing both mate
huge rewards with less value, if the project is potential thats good for long term and less reward but have a big value, thats better for short term

The bounty distributions are not managed well after the collecting enough amount from investors. The bounty hunting is not a profession and they have no many choices except accepting the fact what teams decide to pay they will get the same amount with collected stakes.

Everything works a little differently, not as you say. The ultimate reward for bounty hunter depends on many factors. The main one is the number of participants.

I will go with little reward, less value. because, let's face it; most bounties that offer you large rewards mostly ended up becoming a dead project, However, some hyped project like icon, binance etc who didn't really give much, went up a lot. binance did an airdrop of 1000 bnb in 2017. at the price then, this was just worth 100$. however, bnb has gone over 300X since then. that 100$ would have been around 35,000$ at the current market price. that is how things work - quality matters. A lot of bounties will offer millions of dollars of bounty reward when they themselves are unable to raise even up to 1 million dollars. why on earth will a project pay you a 5 million-dollar bounty when they themselves couldn't rase up to 1/5th of that!. I have missed out on very good projects because their bounties weren't as lucrative as others and I have myself to blame for missing out on the bull run of these bounties.

My advice to bounty hunters is this: do bounties for a project with the aim of being an investor. Ask yourself - if i had the money, would i invest in this project? do they have a good team and a good future? if your answers are no, then chances are, that bounty is not worth doing afterall.

Its one of the reasons i prefer promoting bounty projects with low rewards ,they always grow better in value in nearest future ,its better to spend your energy on quality projects they tend to grow bigger in future,bounties like veil project and tecra coin alike are very good projects with low bounty allocation for hunters ,they are always better

Better to joining a legit bounty campaign with a small reward than huge reward but scam campaign.
Too many campaigns doesn't pay the participants properly, delayed, low price token, etc.
When you received small amount of token with from a good legit ICO, you can sell it later with higher price.

I think I prefer the less reward but at least it has value and worth it. I like projects more have serious action on gaining value. What will happened on projects that has so huge reward then dont have any value at all? I think it wouldnt help bounty hunters right!

It happened to me before I had received many rewards and yet still just stock on my wallet cause of its value none actually. I prefer tokens with worth even though I have little at least van monetize it.

The best project will never use bounty as a promoting place, because the investor will know that the project have a potential in the future. The project that use a bounty campaign as their promoting place are they didn't have a value to sold. I guess bounty hunter cannot give an assessment that project will have a potential in the future, because it's just a place of chancy.

Bounty allocations and rewards does matter when we join campaign, we should know the rewards allocation because we might join into a project that the rewards distributed are inly a few pennies of value. So bounty allocation should be determine before joining in a campaign, even less value would be nice unlike rewards that is much more allocated even for years who has no value still useless.

I have been investing into stocks for over 9 years now and I have plenty of different stocks ( I am not rich so they are all little but I like to put equal shares among many stocks for less risk). Anytime I buy a stock I look at one thing, does it have dividends and if so how much dividends does it have.

Because, if there is no dividends at all then I do not buy but if there is too much dividends then the company can't grow too big. That is why I try to make sure the company makes enough profit to grow itself but also gives a bit of cash to me to buy some more of the same stock, I have literally grown one of my stocks from 500 of them to 1500 of them in 8 years without spending a dime (except that first 500) and I will keep doing the same. So, in crypto if the rewards are too huge I won't get in but if there is none then it could be a problem (except bitcoin and ethereum).

That is a very good point. Many tend to seek those rewards and many don't see the project's potential beyond its price. But I believe that if a project is strong, legit and ambitious with a strong team that delivers, then current rewards or current price won't be so important. It's important to think long-term. That is exactly what I see with Yanu ai.

When a developer talks about reward to me, I totally look at the value I can get from them at the point I finish their campaign, most time before I join a campaign, I first see if it will be possible for me to calculate the stake I will be entitled to and get the total amount I can get at the end of the campaign, which will tell me if the project is worth working on or not.

Let me tell you something mate, we all have these plan initially when ICO project started, we all wanted to hold it for long and stay with the project, but look at your portfolio today, most especially from the ones you have been holding for years now, what has really been the benefit, you only end up holding a coin that will become shit later, so for me, I prefer to look at the reward I will be able to get instantly no matter how little it is.

before joining the campaign do you calculate the estimated results you get? or just follow along. I am sure that before participating in the campaign the participants have been looking for what projects they will participate in. and calculate the prospect of the ecosystem.
related to saving or selling bounties reward, that's is the decision of each user because before they join they already estimate prospect those reward and chose what's the best for it.

we cant really sometime that our project selected to joined in is a profitable token/coin in the market after listing. thats why it is better to to a lot of research and a very good understanding when choosing bounties to join.

it would be better if a small but large value reward would be preferred. now we can take the example of a coin that has a very large total supply in an exchange that only has a low price and becomes a rubbish coin. different from a coin that has a low total supply it must have a high price

The number of awards is not an indicative factor of a promising project. For example, XRT gave me 70K tokens and were able to enter the listing on the exchange. Now the price of this coin is rising.

If we stick to the statement that bigger is better then i think bigger reward with even less value is good especially if the project is good and team is competent then holding these coins can yield huge reward due to price increase.

Huge reward or small reward does not really matter, what is most important is the project itself, like you said yourself, virtually all the projects we even see now are low quality project that does not even know how they will manage fund given to them, not to talk of executing the project.

The thing we need to be after first is what the project can deliver and if they can really stand the test of time, then from there, we can make the decision if the token is worth holding for future or good to be sold instantly when pumped. We don’t even get to have access to those tokens again, you finish a campaign, and either you don’t get the token, or they distribute token and never enter exchange, they could even lock your token too.

large or small allocations are not a problem, the most important is how they can achieve success when conducting an ICO, STO or IEO and after that how they can work to develop projects and maintain price stability

This has been around for sometime now ,bounties with huge rewards are every where promising millions of dollars for promoters which is all lies when the token get listed ,these kind of tokens always end up losing almost 90% of there value ,I prefer to promote bounties with low rewards simply because they are more reliable

It is not about more or less reward but it is about how strong the project and how dedicate the team is. Even some projects with less rewards are useless. I joined one bounty campaign called "Beasy" last year, they had total supply of 250000 coins, they finished their ICO, collected good amount but never launched their product, atlast that project turned scam although it was listed on Idex which was later delisted. I think instead of looking for reward we should look for the project concept and team's working. If project concept is strong and team is dedicated there are strong changes of its success. High rewards from such projects are like "Ice on the cake".

as works with beginning terms of initiation gives of returns on expectation the funds might goes on with further shifts on level with the modest of compliance as investors manage with use of expertise on expends as the request on arrange with the inauguration.

Number of coins or tokens doesn't matter,only important is how much they get value when it hits exchange so even the ICO price can't be considered as our rewards.The same applies to the investors,when we hold 1 bitcoin is lot better than holding 10000000 cheap coins with no real value in the market.

Everyone in the Cryptocurrency space want to make it big especially bounty hunters, considering the time and efforts they put during bounty campaigns so definitely, less reward, big value is better than Huge reward, less value.

It's like having 100,000 of a particular coin Which is equivalent to $50 and having 100 of a particular coin Which is equivalent to $1000. I think we already know what we will go for as an individual. Most of us are here to make profit!.

Its either, as even though you get high or low rewards with either a high or low value in the end the token price is determined by the market. So what I would suggest to do is participate in potential projects that can be a big player in the future.

The current bad threat is for participants participating in the bounty campaign. Because many projects fail and cheat. The impact can from the beginning the results obtained are a little lost and irresponsible, then do not pay

but if I myself have a better small allocation but have a greater value than having a large allocation but the value is small. because now many people choose gifts that have great value even though the allocation is small

Small allocations are now more desirable and certainly when open prices at ICO / IEO have a large price. large allocations usually have low prices which are very vulnerable to dumps. so I think small allocations remain a choice

yeah i see a lot of high paying bounty on the bounty section and i ask myself are they truly gonna pay this much to hunters or they knew the project won't be successful so whatever they give won't mean so much in the end, i think its about time hunters make better decisions when it comes to choosing the right project to support - even though it is not easy to tell which project will be successful or succeed
high paying bounties are not always what they seem.

I think that both things are not homogeneous and it is not a factor to decide or affect the big / small value (bounty). It depends on many factors, including market conditions - project quality -  and the thinking of those involved in those rewards. hold is the way to increase the value of the biggest reward. although it was never easy.

i'm going with less reward but big value, because i'm not that kind of people who hold bounty tokens for too long

if I am personally told to choose yes, of course I will also choose less prizes but the value is great. the problem is that we get a big prize but the red value is the same, we can't sell the results we get. the problem is that the gift if it has been obtained will sometimes be sold.

The strategy is great but I think that there are a lot of people on this forum, that are doing bounties as their first time job and when a project goes scam they are losing their last money. Be patient guys, crypto currencies are here to stay.

as i'm a student at first i'm doing bounties as my prime job back on 2017-2018. I'm lucky i participated on bounties on it's prime era so i have a capital now to use it on trading.
But i'm still doing a bounty until now that i might be lucky got a lot of money like it was on 2017

It can increase the value but the time for holding it is not rewardable now, there's a lots of project who turned into scam after finishing the ICO period
so instead of holding if you still have the chance selling it much better to do it and enjoy the value rewards or use it to reinvest to other project which
can bring you good profits.

Less reward but real.

Trust is mostly the issue now. They have promising rewards but at the end they wind up to be just scammers who cannot stop themselves  from taking that money after a successful marketing.
I have a lot of tokens in my ERC20 account but yet they are all garbage. I am eyeing for some though which have small amounts which still have a lively telegram group.  ;D

There are also some project which has big rewards and few participants and that is what you call a jackpot if  the project hit the success...
There area few which i joined and i can tell that i got some golds.
But to choose between the two i will pick the huge reward less value as many tokens now are falling once listed.

That depends on the project quality. I believe in quality, so if the project has enough potential I'd be happy to take a smaller reward than getting millions of worthless token from a shady ICO bounty. I believe the small reward could turn me into profit if it develops by the time.

I always thought to myself to choose a campaign which has a good project and better in the future although it will give small rewards. I don’t want to sacrifice my time to join a campaign which will be paid me a huge rewards but the project is just nonsense at all.

Huge rewards, big value if I can choose.
But of course, there are no simple choices. And here, I prefer to choose less reward and big value. If the token or coin that I got has the big value and price, It will be worthier to be able to sell on the market and become very profitable.

These times have already passed. Now most ICOs are not as beneficial for developers and bounty hunters as they were in 2017, but the crowdfunding industry is alive and evolving. Moreover, IEOs are also rising, and crypto currency exchanges gain profits from holding token offerings on their trading platform.

---

If the project has an interesting idea and its team is working hard to develop the product, smart investors will buy all the tokens sold by bounty hunters at the ICO price, because they researched its business model and know that the project looks profitable and promising. Therefore, the price of such tokens should not fall while most bounty hunters come to an exchange to cash out their rewards.

If the tokens still have value, although less enough, I will choose the big rewards with less value,. Why? COmmonly, I use the rewards from bounty for the long-term investment. After waiting for around 1-3 years and I think that the project is promising, I believe that the value will increase.

nice one, sometimes we need some kind of optimistic. But sadly most of project that have big rewards-less value are the projects who the rate price are under their ICO and made the investor dissapointed and left them away, so thats make their rate price were more harder to raise up

Because the big rewards mean the big inflation and that could be the main problem. Some icos might put less reward but it has turned a big reward. Remember this is crypto when anything is always unpredicted by anyone.
What we can see that from the result of the product or at least something that we can use it.

Great prizes indeed a very interesting offer. But that does not guarantee that the project can thrive. I also prefer to project that have small gifts but have very good prospects in the future. We must be more thorough in determining a good project. And I often look for projects that have active social media. So we always get information about the project.

I personally prefer small rewards but the value is high, because it will be seen as a successful project and it will be better for the future of the project itself. whereas if the reward is large but the value is small, it will look like a failed project.

For me, I would still prefer large rewards with small value, because those are the type of coin that people pump money into more if they see that the project is a viable ones, reason being that a project with low value will be easy for investors after pre ICO will see it as a cheap value for them to accumulate and will buy as much as they can to keep for the future, but of the value is already high, first thing that will come to their mind is that they have been pumped, which will limit the number of participation that you see in such project, and this will not make the value to grow further, and as a bounty campaign, you need the value to grow for you to really get enough gain from the token received. Some of these low value coins too are the ones that has the tendency to increase by 1000x during the bull run, while the high ones struggles between 5x and 30x.

Yes. or more precisely if the project has a clear roadmap or the products they offer are of high quality in the market, and have a large influence on the market of course the tokens they produce will also have high selling points later. It's just a matter of time

Because before, having huge rewards with huge value at the same time still happens so bounty hunters used to choose them rather than cheap projects who are thinking they can outsmart their participants. But things have changed and neither of the two can be the best choice. I've seen less rewards having no value or less value so it still boils down to the luck of finding the project that has a good plan on their token.

you should know that this is not as easy as you think it is to make such choices.  To start with no one would work to get peanuts as payment and no one wants to get big reward with less value.  The important thing to note is that there no difference from the two of them.

Simply because that bounty pool is small, but the bounty hunter realizes that the project has a lot of potential when going to exchange. Like the GowithMi project that I have seen before, pool bounty is very low. But now its price is x10 compared to the IEO price

Has the bounty been paid? if you have paid it will certainly be a good price. but if not, then the bounty hunter won't feel that high price. we have seen this several times, because when the distribution is done the price will go down immediately, even before the distribution is done sometimes the price has gone down first.

I still no reason why project should be deceitful by offering promises  that is hard to fulfill and most time they will always tell the BM to put a notice that the team have the right to change the rules. I found this very bad. Many of the are gullible because they know most hunters are always looking for campaign with huge reward. For me I don't see any sense in campaign with huge allocated token that will amount for nothing than few token. I could remember MPG did a very intelligent campaign. I still give kudos to the BM that manage their campaign.

Not that easy, not all ICO projects that provide small rewards will be able to make large profits if at the hodl for a certain period of time because some coins actually become even less valuable. So it is indeed necessary to observe and analyze an ICO project before participating in it, but sometimes even though it has been done and we think it is a good project and we get rewarded sometimes the coins obtained do not have value.

We've all seen that a lot of times before. Bounties offering big quantities of token that end up not even getting listed. Or even if they do, they value just over a dollar or even less. I've had bounties from 2 years ago that's stuck in my eth wallet until now. I think project that offer a believable amount in tokens have a bigger chance to make a bounty hunter's effort worth it.

Well it all depends, because sometimes you can’t even tell projects that are going to be successful in the future… that’s why you will see a lot of people these days they won’t even have patience after receive their rewards they will quickly sell it off, and that’s because they now believe that the price of the tokens will once the campaign is over . That is also part of what is causing the prices of these tokens to drop to a less value. You never can tell man. But if you can tell that a token has the possibility to grow later, then it is best to work for it and hold it.

Lately there have been a lot of prizes from the bounty campaign which in the end was of little value when selling on the crypto market. I am confused by this situation.

I agree with you. high price but small prize. even if a project with a small supply, then there is potential value will soar. therefore if the prize is large then the price will look smaller.

That is very true, after all it is the value your accrued rewards bring that matters, not the quantity of rewards. This is another version of "quality over quantity". Lets us be value conscious in our bounty hunting.

It is difficult to immediately understand which project will be promising in the future. In my opinion, it is better to have more tokens with the hope that they will bring profit.

I agree that promises to pay a large reward now look dangerous and, as practice shows, they are almost always not kept. I am also now trying very carefully to study all the proposals for participation and I can say that I clean most of the projects and only a few in which I will probably participate. I also don’t look at the amount of payments, I’m more interested in the product, if there is one or will be, as well as the project team and how the fundraising will go. Let's just say that the priorities for choosing projects for participation have changed.

of course we will like a big reward for us to get. but in reality now we see many projects that only provide a lot of rewards but very little value. even the value is below the initial price, of course it makes bounty participants get a very small reward because the price is very cheap after being listed on the exchange.

truem, sometimes if you want to take part in campaign, it's good not to be tempted by rewards because most of them are not too good I myself often get tokens with a sizable amount, but only a few of them are good the rest are useless and have low grades, we must be vigilant too, because there are also many Low-priced bounties that look promising but are not what we imagined and to avoid that we have to choose several projects and do due diligence first.

My wallet is full of such “tokens of hope”. At one time, I tried not to sell my bounty awards in the hope of their future growth. Over time, they lost their value and turned into zero. Therefore, I realized that you do not need to store your tokens for a long time, but you need to sell them while they still have a price.

That is why we must be truly selective in choosing projects. No problem making bounty allocation as one of the evaluation criteria, choosing the one with a large allocation is also not a problem, it can be our motivation to be more enthusiastic in providing support. If finally the allocation is cut, the price does not match ICO / IEO, then that is a risk, right? Even though we can protest this is not fair, but what can we do? all terms and conditions are the authority of the developer and the management bounty.
Of course what we want is huge rewards from beginning to end, without drama, that's why in addition to trying we also have to pray in order to get that luck.

That's a very good idea. This will contribute to the growth of the coin of such a project, because investors will not sell it at the first opportunity. But even the presence of a small reward does not negate the fact that the beautiful words of the team about the beautiful future of their project will be lie.

Lol, what will now happen if we now have more participant in future, maybe what we will be collecting now is just cent. The mistake I see here with participant and projects is that they are quite greedy also, they want to use all the resources available to quickly achieve their own aim, forgetting the money that they place on the project, how small the money is.

What projects are supposed to do is just to limit the number of participants that is allowed to participate in their bounty program. Sometime is a project having list of up to 10000 participants on a project and I wonder how they intend to even participate in those ones, and how they want to pay them. If they have a limited participant, it would be easy to pay them a huge reward.

I will not say that your advice does not make sense, however, it is not always necessary to sell new tokens. Nevertheless, it is better to store a certain part of tokens until they bring a good profit. For many projects, it takes more time to deploy and for their tokens to become profitable. The only question is to identify promising projects. Here you need not only knowledge and experience, but also a certain amount of luck, since it is usually impossible to determine in advance which project will be successful.

we cannot draw conclusions quickly because not all projects provide small but worthless prizes. and this is what we need to know that prizes cannot be predicted correctly, the real problem is only at the end of the project. sometimes at the end of the project there is a cut in the allocation of prizes and some have a small but valuable prize, the point depends on your speculation in assessing the project at the beginning.

Every project that brings you insane rewards is a scam, because no company in the world is able to pay huge dividends and stay stable. Thats why I prefer to get less dividends from project with big value for a longer period of time.

I have already made sure that the value of the project itself greatly affects the reward for bounty hunters.  I think that you can talk a lot about this topic, but I have already seen such a tendency that all projects whose coins are practically not valued and not traded on exchanges pay full remuneration.  And those projects whose coins are actively bought and sold on the exchanges and have a stable price, they constantly cut back on rewards or even deceive the Bounty Hunters, thereby paying only how much percent of the promised.  An example is MenaPay.

That is, being a bounty hunter requires a lot of patience. So, the most important thing we must understand is a risk. Mostly, successful projects in the market, good prices, distribution for bounties will be postponed for various reasons, right? irony indeed, but that is the reality. But that does not mean all projects are like that, there are still those that apply fairly, but at present, it is quite rare.

Of what use is a huge reward without good value. Imagine being paid tokens in millions or even billions and yet, everything is not able yo cater for one's needs, not even for a day. It will just amount to a waste of time. The reward can be very small, yet it's prtice !right be able to get you a car. That is the desire of everyone. Although, it does not usually happen.

I think the huge reward less value is better because if the project grow, the price of coins will be increased each time. but not wrong if we get the little coin with high value, it is good but many people will be happier if they receive the huge rewards.

We can divide our funds and utilize them to a possible generation of profits if things goes well into those projects being hyped up.Im not saying that this one is preferable but there were people who do love to take the risk on going along with the hyped projects because they know that they can utilize such event for making money.Its risky if you dont know how to get yourself out and too late to secure profits on the right time.Long term aspect is just an another stash and its always good to consider if we do have shorter investments but if we arent sure on the things we gonna do then its better to play safe into those more established coins rather than risking into something which you arent familiar on.

ALTra provides only the best technical analysis charts for altcoins as well as Bitcoin. They believe in charts and T.A., to provide the most accurately, possible information and signals for profitable gains. You can join their free Telegram channel at https://t.me/s/altrapublicchannel or contact Support at https://t.me/altra_support

If you love cryptocurrency, you must follow ALTra's Telegram channel. Best crypto reviews and they even post upcoming events.

Yup, don't fall for that tactic because if they were making that money then they would want it for themselves.

There is truth in what you said, but for now it's a little more difficult to get a good project and will provide benefits in the future or you could say the project will continue to grow and be very useful going forward so that the rewards we get will have high values ​​and can give us benefits later. So, we need a strategy or we need to go deeper in analyzing and observing every project that we think has great potential.

If the project is reliable, you're right. For this, it is necessary to examine the project closely. You should look at the previous jobs of your team and the Linkedin page. In addition, how much holders they have, which exchanges they are listed etc. I think these are important details that need to be examined before investing in a project.
If all the incubators are green for you, you can easily choose the profitable product even if the product's price is low.

we see every day tens or even hundreds of projects come out, so to determine it is very difficult, even if you do research and always pay attention before joining a project, it does not guarantee that the project you are participating in will be successful.
I also do not recommend that you participate in all projects.
but being too careful is not too good.

If the team promises to offer huge rewards, but their estimate is realistic, it's okay. Now, I prefer those campaigns, even though the budget is lower, will produce a much better return in future, and the campaign will be in brief length.

sometimes you can take risks and take part in the project even if you have any doubts. in the end, it can make a very good profit

Recently, I’ve been doing just that, I don’t grab onto work in all projects in a row. Now I participate in only two or three campaigns, as my wallet is full of coins, which maybe not recover in the future.

Care about only BTC or USD value, not number of tokens that can have zero value in total. I mean it is better to earn 1 toke worth 10USD, than 1 million tokens worth nothing.

Everything can change once the token is listed in the market.
we are all about the demand once out in the market.
so we are not really sure of that! as long as we are not yet listed on the market.
all i want is high reward with few participants.

same thing my wallet has full of shit coins and i dont even know this one will have a real value in the future but maybe one of the day this one became gold .

it will be difficult because every campaign that offers a large payment, so many participants will participate in the campaign. and in my opinion the results depend on our needs.
so if you are hoping about a large project with few participants I think it will be difficult to happen, plus many more participants can just add the project income, or maybe the opposite will be detrimental

True. These days, it gets really how to know which of these projects will be truly valuable. Almost like we are playing a gamble, hoping that whatever bounty we get into, truly rewards us for the troubles. But in all, I will still like to highlight that the risks might be worth it sometimes. You never truly know which of these projects will pay off eventually.

We both have same idea running in the mind, there is no use of running after bounties with large rewards that will never or might never come to reality, getting rich of spreadsheet is just a dream,instead its better to promote projects that have low bounty rewards but assurance of getting paid

Hunting for crypto bounties is nothing more than a gambling now, you can't predict which project will pay you for your hardwork after bounty ends, many of these new bounty projects are time wasters but if you don't give up you can make something worthy out of it someday, its better to focus on bounty projects that are already trading on exchanges, they have better chance than projects that haven't been listed yet.

It is very unlikely that we are going to see the market of icos behaving as they did in 2017, many bounty hunters in those days could obtain great profits from a single bounty but now you're lucky if you can obtain a few dollars if you participate in several bounties, to me it seems that is time for people to forget about bounty hunting as a way to raise some money in this market, if you really want to be profitable then you need to become an investor otherwise you are wasting your time.

Your personal experienced will tell you not to waste your time anymore, do more research and be selective when participating with any bounties. There's some projects who still possible to excel after being listed as long as the team will make more efforts and improvements. If the team is actively working with the communities there's still chance for that project to bring decent and not to waste your wallet space.
There's no assurance if what fate will bring to your work, everything is dependable from how the project will succeed.

Your idea is not that bad but you need to consider also whether that certain project is giving the right amount of rewards. For example the project is a promising one and they will only give like 1-2k$ value of rewards for 4 months of campaign.

Yes holding for a long term will do the trick if you really trust the project but is it enough if for example you hold it for 1 year and your reward worth of 10$ turns to 50$ if in case the price goes to x5? But if they are giving a reasonable reward then why not.

What brings big rewards, if a project does not have any value? It is pretty common nowadays, that projects are offering 2m dollars as a bounty budget, while they can only collect several thousands dollars during the token sale. Makes no sense at all.

Well, I cannot say this is like this everytime. Because when a project has a strong and to back the price up, even if they distribute so much rewards, they can keep the value high somehow. Only shitcoins and unprofessioanl teams who just need money distribute so many tokens and turn their asset into garbage, then it is one of the deadcoins in blockchcain space.

for me if the huge reward is a great opportunity to get more tokens, the price problem in the market is difficult to predict from the start, the important thing is that the team that is actively developing the project will definitely have good value, if the allocation bounty is small has a participant boundary rule, it's good  supported, if not, you will waste time to support the Bounty project

It really depends on the bounty a research that you do. A small team of people can create a successful bounty or a big team can create escambia county. You just need to do research.

The developers of icos are being too arrogant, they think that just because they value their coins at a particular price everyone else will value their coins in the same way and that is not true, so when they try to sell their coin they make the assumption that all their coins will be sold, then they create their bounty and give some fake numbers about how much coins they will give and their value but then reality hits them, they are unable not sell most of the coins and instead of getting millions of dollars they just get a few thousand dollars and the bounty they thought was so valuable now is not worth anything.

I think there is not much difference between both the huge rewards, low value and the low rewards, huge value. Because it all depends on the amount you are able to recover from it. You said since you can hold the low rewards and make more in the future, but the truth is that you cannot be certain about the progress of a project in the future.
And how sure are you that the huge rewards project cannot also be successful in the future. It all depends on the project itself and not the reward.

I think this is a difficult decision, it all comes back again depending on the project we are participating in and the good work, whether it is a large prize of less value or a large prize of less value that is important in my opinion, the coins we get are highly valued in the market.

Many bounty campaign have less reward for bounty participants, we are only received about $20 for every campaign we are joining. Now is not good time to get participant with bounty campaign project because many bounty campaign manager never give reward according what have their announce on bounty tread forum.

Allocations can still be reduced if the campaign manager has provided this information to all participants. But there must be a reason, if for no reason the campaign manager's actions are fraudulent and deserve sanctions. An example is when a sales token does not reach the target, because this manager and the team may have the right to cut the campaign budget.

It scares me when they promise a big reward. This is usually a scam. But sometimes there are pleasant exceptions. For example, if you invest in new projects. then maybe mega profit. Now I have discovered a new YUSRA GLOBAL coin (https://yusra.global) with a POS-mine. Now mining has just started and you can earn up to 30% per month. It seems to me that this is real and promising!

The present prizes are quite disappointing because some of them do not have prices and this is very detrimental to us as participants. we do not want to of course get a lot of losses from the work. 2019 became a sad year for participants who worked on the bounty campaign

It is not all about the rewards they offer but the success of the project  itself, since the bear market started after 2017 bull run its a bit hard to find good campaigns as most of them have no concrete plans on how to survive during the market down trend that will led for their token to fall its price.

I wonder if there will be another moment in time in which it will be a good idea to join bounty campaigns, for a few years bounty hunters had been trying to get profits by promoting new coins, but the market is not interested in those coins as we have seen during the recent recovery in which bitcoin was the coin that performed the best, which is why I think that if there are no big changes in the market of icos it is likely that it's not going to be profitable to join bounty campaigns ever again.

if a project has no way to survive when the market goes down I think they have failed in developing their project, and it needs to be recognized that many projects fail when the market goes down that makes the project die. the concept of a project must indeed be perfect in any condition or they will die.

Yes it is true, sometimes how large the number of tokens we get will be in vain if the tokens are worthless and there is no volume, so sometimes we think what is the point of getting tokens in large numbers but have no value and we will conclude that it is better to have a little but has value. So, I think it all depends on how the team behind it can continue to develop the project and how we observe each new project that has the potential to continue to grow in the future.

Exactly!! I couldn't agree more. People are blinded by the numbers but do not realize that it does not matter if you have a whole lot of something, if no one is willing to pay something for it then it is useless.
A fistful of shit is still a fistful of shit no matter how much you try to cover it up or make it sound pretty and adding more shit certainly doesn't fix the problem. I am much happier to take small amounts of a working project with a purpose rather than just some random idea that probably will never see the light of day.

Situations of course are different, but of course in 99% of cases it doesn’t matter how many tokens you get for participating in the bounty, these tokens will cost nothing at all or will bring you a couple of dollars, or at best a couple of tens of dollars and holding these tokens it also makes little sense because the new altcoins almost all die after some time.

Huge rewards in bounty campaigns are almost leading to nothing. The bigger the rewards are, the less is the possibility that this token sale is going to end successful. I would rather prefer to have less rewards on a good price level.

I prefer Less rewards why because bounty with huge rewards is a huge possibility of the token will not prosper so, i rather to stick in a small rewards with a good campaign manager instead. Since the project will likely to be successful in long term there are some good tokens/projects were like this and still standing after the ups and downs of cryptomarket up to this day.

There are bounties that have paid hugely and at the end hunters were able to sell and got some cool profit. Allocation also matters, it doesn't necessarily mean that a project that pays hunters with small reward will end up successful. We need to be selective, do research and also look at the bounty allocation and participant in a bounty project so that at the end of the task, you see a fair reward.

I don't think you will be able to prove this in any kind of market condition. The fact is simple and the smooth market conditions give an opportunity for the useless projects to use unforeseen circumstances and use it for the development but the teams care about doubling or tripling the initial starting investment amount in a short time. That is the reason the strong projects tend to stay away from when the investors ask about the big exchanges, the working appliance of the "roadmap machine".

Some companies pay really big amount of rewards but still do not dump and they are still successful. I think its about tokenomics and teams principles. Some teams collect token from the bounty hunters so price does not dump at all. But yeah, %90 of the time people sell the tokens and dump the price, and makes that coin dead for a long time.

They are many ideas around the project but all of them is unsure if they can really able to do.
It doesnt matter if the allocatez amount is large or not it all depend on the project itself.
 sometimes those project that you has no future will give a good profit after the crowdsale completed.

It is ridiculous to try to blame bounty hunters just because the price of a coin may be dumping, despite their claims developers only give a very small percentage of the coins they will create to bounty hunters, the ones that can truly affect the price of the coin are those that bought a substantial amount of them.

And even if it was true that bounty hunters could affect the price of a coin to the point to make it crash then that means such coin was not really good to begin with and would have died anyway.

This was more likely what happened last 2017. Right now, eitherways, no matter how huge the token allocation or rewards in a project, the market value would more likely fall upon being listed on the market. The bottomline right now is the market behavior. It highly affects the outcome of a project or coin perhaps, for a long run. This is also the reason why some investors are not into projects right now. Just be patient still and wait for positive changes in the market.

The project itself will determined the value of your rewards, in anyhow even the smallest numbers of allocated funds but because of successful listing and the value has been lifted by supported investors who are believing with the usage of the project. It will turned small numbers of rewards to a much promising value. And I agree it will be depend to how the project will turn out, success will be the deciding factors to enjoy the rewards that you will going to received out from the team.

I personally do not join any bounty campaign if I do not see the potential in that project so when I see hunters joining any project that looks destined to fail from the beginning, I start wondering if they even did any prior research before joining the campaign, it's not how many tokens you hold that matters, it's how valuable those tokens turn out to be and when hunters start to understand this, this space would become more productive for them.

It's because no one will buy the real value of the tokens when it enters the market because nothing special with the token/coin. Investors are much smarter than 2 years ago when they will buying all ICO project tokens/coins in exchange without knowing what the products are about. Right now they've become more selected and they do their own research before investing to a coin. So, scam projects would just only earn few money from the new and beginner investors.

I think that the answer is clear, you are going to work for virtual money or real money? I rather take 100USD per month in BTC or ETH than possible 1000$ in a cryptocurrency that doesn't even exist yet.  ;)

Yes, I agree with you, it's better to get a little gift token but in the future the value can increase. instead of getting lots of tokens but the coins don't have value or tokens become shitcoin. therefore we must be more careful in choosing a prize campaign. choose a project that has an experienced manager and development team and don't be tempted by a large reward.

I promoted files fm project some time ago and after bounty ends we are all waiting for how payouts but unfortunately files fm teams said they never meet their softcap target so they won't be able to pay bounty hunters what they expect, we are told we will only get 50$ worth of token, as you can see, not meeting softcap is a big problem

Your logic is not entirely correct.And I'll tell you why!https://icodrops.com/drg-token/ (https://icodrops.com/drg-token/).This project set aside a large sum for the bounty and they eventually raised $ 320 million.The bounty rewards were very generous.Therefore, do not be afraid of large projects.Not the fact that they will not pay anything!

What do you mean by huge reward with no value and small reward, huge value?  Is a worker not due for his wages after completing a task? I think the best thing to happen is for project managers to fulfill all promises made on a project and whatever a bounty hunter or even the investors will do with their money is left to them

Having 200 tokens may have bigger value than having 2million tokens, mostly they have no value but sometimes they can, take a look at gowithmi spreadsheet, someone has 229999 tokens of gowithmi and presently thr value is almost a thousand dollar, how good the project idea is matters the most

Let's be practical and not to be too greedy at all, I will have to agree with you with that, as a freelancer, I am also choosing what will benefit me at the present, if the CEO would like to pay me in tokens for a $1k worth or $100 worth of Bitcoin, I would choose Bitcoin over it. I will just manage my fund wisely so that I still can save with that little amount.

Yes, having 200 altcoins will not help us to make money because most of the value of the coin is very low which we won't get any profit even after working for many months. People who have a higher rank or higher referrals will get higher numbers of stakes, they will get the majority of coins when they start distributing the tokens.

getting a lot of tokens is not guaranteed to get a large nominal, let alone so many altcoins owned. many altcoins fall to the bottom and they are hard to get up, so even though the number of tokens is large, but few if used as fiat. it would be better if the token was exchanged for altcoin at the top, so it would be safer

Number is nothing but the value it can purchase, most people believe in big numbers forgetting the conversion rates of the coin/token.
I will prefer small reward with big value compare to big rewards that shall be useless in my wallet.

I agree with your point. We should not only see immediate benefits, so invest in the long term. But it is also very difficult to do, because people are often disturbed by lavish promises, lucrative resources without knowing it is a scam. And now, it's very difficult to distinguish fake, how do you know the big prize they give is worthless?

Always look for the project how much the value to go up to the mark in few days once the sale started in the exchange. So we need to check the best projects whether it is scam or not.
Then scammers shows like they are doing great but you need to be little careful and invest on good projects.