Bitcoin Forum

Good day everyone, I've been back here and now there is a lot of new things here. Also about the funds raising strategy. Nowadays IEO is the most very effective fund raising today. Also because the exchange holds the token and they distributed after the token sale. And also this kind of token sale is favor to an exchange. But I saw some errors or false about IEO. There is token sale for example on LATOKEN exchange, That exchange (LATOKEN) sell the token (IEO) but in the end they will not list on their exchange so for me that is not good. What if the token is sold out? And its not listed on that exchange mentioned. So how the traders/investors will get the profit? Also very risky right? What do you think guys?

People are very smart and wise now. They are now thinking very carefully before to invest so the chance of being lose is now decreased. I invest on some IEO and now its successful, Now I am waiting to list the token on the exchange. My mind is still worrying if this token will be listed or not.

There's still a lot of risk on it, not only because the exchange carries the responsibility, and set up the criteria for  these coins, after the crowdfunding the exchange has no control on those coins anymore if it gets dump or it will continually pump up, so do your own research and do not rely on the exchange's decision.

Every exchanges have their own techniques of handling IEO and this is why i respect gate.io,IEO is what ICO should have been in the past maybe if it was IEO from the very start it will still be standing strong,IEO will surely last longer than ICO for sure

LAToken is not the recommended exchange, it is one of the biggest volume exchanges with fake, and many are experiencing problems there, so I suggest all of us to be careful about the exchange

as i knew if a token conducting an IEO in any exchange after the token sold out during the IEO period,,
the token will be tradeable on that exchange as soon as possible mate,, and maybe thats the main advantages from IEO if we comparing with ICO

I think the project needs to think about solving the problem because they cannot sell their token in the exchanges. Maybe they need to reschedule. I don't know about the traders/investors because I don't buy any new IEO projects and I don't want to risk my money to invest in the new project. But maybe there will be many investors who want to invest in the project.

Crowdfunding via ICOs is the past trend, that was hottest in 2017. This year, the hot trend is IEOs which are perfect tools to raise funds via crowdfundings. Binance and OKEX are biggest exchanges, so there are no issues with their IEOs, sure. However, for other exchanges (smaller, young) and their IEOs, investors should be careful and do detailed analysis & research before spending their money to invest.

IEO developers should have to have at least 2 exchanges to hold coins from the IEO results because if they only rely on 1 exchange they will easily experience obstacles such as dumping prices and not being profitable for many people. including investors

that's the worst exchange site in my life. Worst UI/UX and Security. So many people have made a lot of complaints about that and the developers are never give a good feedback about that. All of volumes in latokens are fake.

Well, the main problems are not solved yet. However, the IEO has improved the market today. And gave the investor a lot of new opportunities. The growth of Bitcoin after 2018 is associated precisely with new investments.

I have also seen two projects, holding IEO on the particular exchange but not listing on the same after end of IEO.
I am wondering why they don't list on same exchanges. What conditions get offered by projects and IEO holding exchanges between each other, don't know.

nowadays IEO already same like ICO , u know, scammed on IEO also easy to do with newest exchange .
with fake volume , fake buyer , recently we know about IDAX pro
the scammer exchange with fake buyer on their IEO.
so i guess, IEO its not effective like earlier.

IEO making every crypto users funny buddy.

They never care to make the business on one streamline and never give output efforts for the users who believe they do something for crypto industry. Maximum they can make the money and stay strengthy in the market with out a product. Nothing else apart from that.

Well, IDAX is an exchange that should not be dealt with in any way. Fraud can be avoided by taking part in IEO on trusted exchanges.
Looks like the IEO hype has lessened. Now the fact of IEO on a good exchange does not guarantee the pump. Therefore, it becomes more risky than before.

Therefore it is expected to all traders or investors should be more careful in determining investments. whether to invest in ICO or also in the IEO. because without taking into account the trade done will get a loss.

LATOKEN does indeed have bad reputation but the dump should have his own reason, just because a coin listed in LATOKEN then that coin getting dump, not like that. But you're right an IEO from an exchange like that, is should be more noticed.

The reason why many investors prefer to choose IEO is that the token or the coin has been listed on the exchange. We will think that this coin will be interested, promising, or profitable or not seen by the progress of the trading volume on the exchange. However, it is not enough. It needs further information and research on the coin itself, the team, and also the exchange where they list the coins.

The inefficiencies with ICOs led to IEOs and since then investors have been making good returns or at least a greater number. One thing about IEO that makes it stand out is the fact that there is no need to worry about scam because the exchange will ensure their integrity is kept intact by ensuring the team is legit.

IEO is more effective as bank/ fiat is more effective than blockchain/cryptocurrency... Or as ripple is more effective than Bitcoin or ethereum.

If your only goal is to make alot of money in cryptocurrency world then IEO is definitely "more effective" than ICO otherwise it is not "more effective" than ICO.

This is what investors want most because if they can liquidate immediately after joining then they will surely make a huge profit from big IEO projects. Currently everyone participates in IEO because this is a new trend for everyone and surely this trend will last more than 3 years because this is the safest and less risky investment channel so many people prefer investing in IEO during this period

Well if you can see, IEO is less risky compare to ICO. It is a very effective way for a company to raise funds because they are being backed by a reputable exchange. Now regarding the LATOKEN IEO, I think the best thing to do is not to buy tokens on their exchange and just buy on other exchanges.

They will get profit as the coin gets listed to another exchanges which is a bit weird :D. They launched an IEO on an exchange and yet they didn't list it or maybe there are some problems between the exchange and the company that is why they didn't listed it.

It is best to stay away from this exchange because most IEO projects proposed by this exchange are shit projects and there is no liquidity for investors so many investors have lost a lot of money at this exchange . I think Latoken has a volume of virtual transactions so don't trust Latoken and there are more than 100 IEO projects listed here and most are bad projects.

I think most trusted IEO only binance, good volume and bring profit..after launching they have trading competition thats good for pumping IEO coin on market.

in my opinion the truth is that the IEO is more effective than ICO, but it depends on what IEO is registered in the market. if I see IEO on latoken, many are stopped in the middle of the road. As a result, it is less than in the IEO process.

IEO becomes somewhat popular because of the instant listing and trading of the project token after the distribution of the token. This because the token is offered by the exchange platform directly to the investors. Also, the authentic of the project is scrutinized initially by the exchange before offering.

People tend to follow the trend and so everyone is joining or participating in Initial Exchange Offering this was given birth to after series of scam during the ICO days, also it is preferred because the exchanges do research before accepting any project, so it is likely that IEO is safer and listing is also fast.

I think IEO best thing to happen recently, now investors are less worried as compared to ICO, but still, need some good improvements.

And the trend in selling tokens now is the IEO. I think the IEO is indeed better than the ICO because after the sales period is complete, the exchanger can trade tokens. Investors get certainty and the developer team does not need to create a complicated marketing scheme

What more can we say..because there is tend to be a believe and trust in an exchange than buying coins on a company site that might just close. And it really has been working. We have not really had of any scam yet.

IEO is definately a better fundraising tool for blockchain projects out there. The team are well vetted by exchanges to create a trusted environment and for investor profit probability is high too

it should have been thought of by investors before they put down or give a fund to the IEO program. because now a lot of coins are popping up but don't have a price on the market they raise. The incident happened because after the coin launch their program had no purpose so that the token was not registered in the market and just disappeared at a certain time.

Holding IEO but didn't have the intention to list that coin to their exchange? That is a straight garbage IEO then. I mean, what's the use of IEO or the role of exchange if it goes that way. Even ICO will make a lot more sense than that. Maybe, the exchanges just want that easy money without the need to maintain that coin in their market.
Whoever people who think to participate into such nonsense IEO which doesn't get listed in that exchange after the crowdfunding finished, better think twice.

It seems that from the beginning of the year until now, the IEO is still a fever and has gone through ICO. With many successful projects on large trading platforms like binance, houbi, okex, ... IEO has given investors a certain trust. However, some platforms and projects take advantage of the popularity of IEO to cheat, especially some small and insecure trading platforms, its value is very low compared to IEO value.

Much effective to get fast profit, and some IEO project who have strong fundamental can give you huge return in a long investment. Some of them is bad actually, with no or slow progress but if you invest on good project and have a real progress, it will give you good return on the future.

Change is constant and the day the world stops changing, then something is terribly wrong, the ICO model has been found to have many flaws and criminals has taken advantage of this fact until people finally got tired and stopped investing in them. This leafy a gap in the fundraising aspect and now IEOs had come to fill that gap, I wonder what the next would be. I see a long and colourful future for IEOs before that happens though.

There are flaws inside ICOs, and IEOs. There is nothing perfect, so that is life, and soon we will see others replace IEOs to become better method to do crowfund raising. For now, when IEOs hot trend has still been here, and still been hot, why not enjoy its ride and choose good exchanges and good IEOs for your investment.

Some time ago there were certain news in the information space, where it was said that in some countries they found a way to control the company ico.  Since ico companies really have a lot of potential, for example, the French state also decided to use this opportunity to give new projects the opportunity to develop, but also to remove as many scammers from the market.  Therefore, I consider not only the ieo, but the company’s ico is also a promising future direction.

Very interesting thought and IEO being so much better compared to an ICO, it still has risks that we need to be very careful of. Other than the issues presented by the OP, IEO's can be hard since its quite exclusive and therefore, difficult for everyone to really participate. Micro Token Offerings (https://medium.com/@StandardTokenizationProtocol/micro-token-offering-mto-3-d5a732475ffa?utm_source=lx) are somehow solving those issues and to deliver an improved solution using their platform. Everything needs improvements and its always great to see people and companies aiming to provide all of us that solution.

IEO is very perfect but still has its own bad effect too, most IEO conducted usually give instant profit to thee investors, but if IEO continues this way, and there is no control to it, then everyone will just turn the IEO platform too to HYIP scheme where you only come to make profit in a short term and then exit when you see the profit.

Imagine all investors pulling their profit out immediately they conduct and IEO, would this not even cause more damage to the market, the moment they pull massive fund out of the project, then the project is already heading for a being a shitcoins even if it carries IEO title, so I guess this is why these exchanges put up this strategy so the investors can stay a little longer with the project, and once they have started this, expect other exchanges too to adopt it.

Of course, now IEO is much more effective than ICO, because there are no such fraudulent projects as ICO

Yes for remove the scammers from crypto world IEO is the best option than ICO. There is literately no chance to scam on IEO if the exchange is good. It's sadly news that Latoken exchange didn't listed that token. But now before the IEO, good project have to deal with exchange that they listed there token or not. And Investors should know about token listed thing otherwise again this kinda work done by another exchange and another project.

IEE collected a stir in the beginning, as soon as they appeared. But it was impossible to get into these projects, I tried 6 times ... Only the lottery works, but even there are few chances!

That must have been according to whatever deal they have agreed on. Latoken cannot just break it. Perhaps their contract was to only use the exchange for the offering alone and not the coin listing afterwards. Or perhaps some rules are violated, hence the decision not to list the coin. But this is probably the first time I hear of an IEO staged on a particular exchange and then not listing the coin right after. The rest of the IEOs that I am a bit familiar with is that the exchange on which they conducted their IEOs will also list their coins for trading.

There is no doubt that IEO is doing far better than ICO because of the trust investors have in it but nothing last forever, so, be wise.

As with ICO, the IEO also has risk factors. One of them as mentioned op. I have experienced the same thing with exchange bitforex. Where one of the IEO tokens there was cancelled, so it was not traded there as scheduled before. Investors are still quite lucky because BitForex is one of the big exchanges so they want to return investors' funds and are compensated 10% of the capital. So, even though the IEO is quite promising, investors still have to analyze the project to the maximum and choose an exchange that is responsible.

I think its just to pushing on token sale only, the team want they product sold out with listing on the exchange in ICO phase. Its make investors worry about their funds if in the end the project didn't list on any exchange and disappear.

If there is no any misunderstanding between the project owner and the exchange conducting the IEO, I have not seen an IEO being conducted on any exchange any will not be tradeable on that exchange, infact that is the ONLY advantage that IEO have over the traditional ICO. Investors are not guaranteed not to be waiting for long before the token get listed as it is mostly tradeable immediately after the end of IEO. It could have been better if there is a reference of any project that have performed IEO in any exchange and not get listed.

Ieo is far better than ico because we can depend on the exchanges that are listing them than individual that has scam a lot of people. I have decided not to invest in any projects that raise funds through ico and if I want to make any investment during the early stage it has to be ieo .

Even the most popular exchanges with a good reputation can become bankrupts. Although IEO is less risk than ICO, I do not have extra money to spend on these projects. Trading is the kind of business that seems to be the most honest one. Even when bots are involved, it is more transparent. Besides, trading cryptocurrencies, you can make profits much faster.

Many people talk about this and consider that IEO is much worthier than ICO. It may be true, However, we must also see what exchanges to list the tokens. ICO is actually also offering good concept, but some times we cannot differentiate the scam or legit one. Additionally, they have their own upsides so that we can find out the greater chance to pick the right projects, the way is by analyzing the prospect of the projects in the future, not only for now.

I cannot conclude to that idea since, the situation didn't come to show positive results by now. IEO isn't yet fully established and yet more people awaited to see good results after this certain thing came to us unknowingly.

You're right, Once that exchange not listed the token who made IEO on their exchange. Its like you lose your funds or money. But once its cancelled of course they need to bring back the funds of investors. We need to check very carefully before we spend our money. Base on my experience do not based on the funds collected, Check all the details before to participate on every investment and involved money.

It's still risky IMO it needs more refinedment

From this finding, a new lesson has been found about the IEO that is surprising that there are things that are not good so the next step must be very careful if you want to join the IEO project, especially investors and don't let this happen again

Investing in IEO projects will give you rest of mind than investing in ICO unless the ICO project stands out among other ICO projects,very few ICO projects are good this year,be careful when choosing

Yes, IEO is more effective and ICO has phased out, nobody talks about it anymore. Now new projects and even projects with failed ICO tend to do IEO on exchanges to raise funds for project development. The difference is very clear, IEO gives listing assurance and to an extent portrays the team as genuine since the exchange already verified them. Also note that there has not been scam for IEOs done on reputable exchanges, that's a clear distinction with ICOs which reaped investors off their hard earned funds.

The IEO is on the rise, it cannot be fooled that at present all investors are more interested in investing in the IEO than ICO nowadays..  not only investors who actually benefited greatly from the presence of the current IEO, but the bounty hunters and the exchanger which was the place where the IEO took place were also greatly benefited  ;D

It seems to me that now IEO has become like an ICO,since there are already too many of them,and not all coins after IEO begin to grow,and many investors are disappointed in them.

for now ICO and IEO are not much different because the goal is to raise money,The IEO is a little safer because it is supported by exchanges but with the highest exchange record.

I think that participating in the IEO is best on the top exchanges. So you carry much less risk. The potential profit is also smaller, but it is better to make a small profit than a loss.

yes, I too believe this in the past many people have lost their money but in IEO exchange are selling these coins so I believe many investors now much more open to investing.

Its all the same actually but they are different in set-up but overall they do have the same useless projects excluding into some like BTT IEO in Binance where you can
see theres an actual product but on majority all of them are made of thin air.They might be good when it comes to security but when it comes to profits they dont really increase too much like on ICO hits up thousands.

You are right. By choosing ieo in the global market, it will reduce the risk of scam even though the risk of loss persists. That's because cryptocurrency prices are very volatile, depending on demand and supply in the market. Ieo gives an advantage because it provides certainty of the existence of these tokens or coins in the market, unlike the case with ico, which still has to guarantee the certainty of listing or not on the market. But there is no guarantee that it is more effective than Ico, it all depends on the project.

maybe they don't immediately list their tokens for a number of reasons, but what I see is that most of the projects that do the IEO will list the exchange and only 2-5 projects will do as you say

IEO is currently the trusted way investors in the crypto ecosystem invest in a new crypto project.  IEO has solved the basic challenges ICO failed to provide solutions to. With IEO, scam projects are easily eliminated since exchange platform will never encourage promoting projects that may make their users to exit their platform.

But there is still the risk factor. We don't know if IEO will continue to grow or investors will grew tired of all the hype and the pump. While us ordinary investors can't even join the fun and enjoy the profit because only a handful of whales are benefiting from such business model.

IEO is only really better than ICO if you are a project team and crypto trading platform. If you are an investor, it will be very dangerous for your pocket money, because it is not always easy to buy ICO, you have to compete with thousands of others to buy. If the IEO cannot be purchased, the trading platform's own currency will certainly be sold off and you will lose 20 30% immediately. Even if you buy an IEO, you are not sure if you can multiply your account, because in fact, many IEOs have multiplied their accounts with 0.5 0.3 or 0.1 times.

I don't really think you investing in an IEO project strongly guarantee that the coin or tokens will be automatically listed. There are no specific differences between ICO and IEO. IEO is just rebranding of ICO to bring back investors into investing in new crypto projects. I don't really think IEO is much effective compared to ICO.

Almost all but there are some IEOs are not yet getting listed instantly to the exchange site. but the IEO gives more guarantee for investors to see the coin that they have been invested in to be listed with the more chance compared with non IEO or i can call that as a usual ICO.

I think so, where IEO is a sale held by an exchange, the coins sold will be listed immediately. there are many cases of ico failing in 2018 and causing many investors who are afraid of ico

Yes you are right, IEO is still the best for now until further proven otherwise, but I am beginning to see many complains about IEO projects too nowadays, in fact I just finished reading a  post where a forum user poised on the projects that has gone on Binance chain, and virtually all of them are already in danger zone, it means majority of them are being dumped too and are finding it difficult to rise just the way ICO projects too are not rising, so what then makes IEO projects different if that is the case, and I am beginning to ponder on that too.

I have not seen any project of IEO that popular, most projects that we still have in the market that are very popular are still products of Ethereum smart contract, and so what then makes IEO better than ICO other than the security they guarantee investors that their money is not going into a scam pocket.

Doing your own research is a must, if you want to invest on IEO.
First thing is just by looking on the exchange that held that IEO. In my opinion, LATOKEN is not good exchange. That's why some IEO on LATOKEN can't run successfully.

IEO is the new fundraising trend in crypto and have taken over from ICOs. And this is because it is more effective and reliable than ICO.

I also think it is better for a project to list on the exchange it did IEO on in other to perform well because it already have volume on that exchange.

At this moment in this market IEOs are very popular and many of them are highly profitable too. In last year the ICO market was falling down and not performing so well. And day by day it's going worse. But after IEOs came to the market everything changed. Cause they came with some big name and they are more trusted than any ICOs. At this moment not the market IEOs are doing huge sell but ICOs are not so popular cause trust factors are less in icos.

It is too early to come to a conclusion that IEO's are much effective than ICOs.  IEO has been in action for just some few months now comparing to ICO which had been in operation for years now, you can't stand on just these few months to rate the progress.  IEO has a long way to go before we can somehow say that its quiet effective than ICO...

You're right, it's too early to say that the IEO is better. It's just that the IEO is better at attracting market interest by giving confidence that the token or coin is ready to be traded on the exchange. The availability of tokens or coins that are ready in the market will make investors more interested, even though it is not a guarantee that the price will soar, investors must still be careful and conduct an in-depth analysis of the project from the token or coin.

I don't think it's a mistake too if the token that does IEO is not listing in the exchange they used after IEO ends. all back to their respective policies, besides latoken is not a good exchange too.

ICOs are not modern nowadays,I also prefer to invest in the IEOs. The costs are less and profits are higher than ICOs. The experienced investors know the best ways to choose the investment worth projects and they choose exchanges with considerable volume. Binance IEOs are preferred because of this reason.

With safer features from Exchangers. So it is not wrong if the IEO is much loved by the crypto community. And with the IEO, we can reduce the risk of scams. Because ICO could manipulate data on their website.

I think its the shift of a new era in terms of offering and I think IEO is starting to make a difference. A lot of investors experienced nightmares in ICO that is why they are moving in a new way with less scam.

If you have participated in IEO projects then you don't need to pay much attention to the time listed because you will surely be able to sell that coin in the earliest time. Most of the current IEO projects are profitable for investors but only top exchanges can do this because big exchanges have large amounts of money to pump that coin. I think this is a very effective and smart strategy and choosing a big exchange join IEO is something you should do in the near future.

Maybe some investors may say that IEO was better than ICO where in my thoughts its just the same, its just an upgrade thing of ICO. The main problem is if you invest in an IEO, where it is subjected to a success, you would wait for it to be listed on that exchange where IEO takes place, but what if it is not being listed? That's the consequence out there.

IEO is better than ICO in terms of raising funds more effectively through exchanges and if the exchange is a very popular exchange it will easily create better awareness for the IEO project which always results in quick token sell out.

for listing problem on exchange, indeed for laoken it is very strange, I suggest avoiding launchpad and looking for a more quality launchpad for example Kucoin or Gate.io or exchange that has high glory (Binance, Bitfinex) but of course for this launchpad  the investment minimum is very large but guaranteed.

The minimum investment only applied in the major exchange like binance or bitfinex, but the medium exchange site like gate.io is not putting a minimum amount to invest but gate.io used tier as its mechanism to determine the position of each investors that wanna participate in the IEO. but IEO is more effective these days. gate.io as an exchange site with the best return from its IEO sale.

yeah IEO is better than ICO, investors feel safer because the coin has been confirmed to direct the listing in the exchange, but if the coin is not listed in the exchange then I think it is the same as ICO. but I guess it could be the desire of the team to delay the listing time.

I don't think it's too early to say the IEO is better than the ICO, because for now it's no longer the ICO era. Well, I mean everything has its own time. Moreover ICO is now being littered with scammers and has reduced investor interest. The effectiveness of ICO or IEO cannot be judged by the length of time they exist, but is judged by its development. And now I see the development of the IEO is far better than ICO, this proves that Investors are more interested in the IEO.

Effectiveness in terms of raising funds, for sure. But it is still not guaranteed,,, I have seen now a few IEOs only get a small percentage of fills, especially the silly ones at yobit for example!

Projects will move to IEOs but hopefully the exchanges do not get greedy and implement the strictest due diligence. Not that it will really help to reduce the scams,,,

Yes that is true and there are some instances that the team decided to conduct an IEO on that exchange and announce that they will get listed there right after the IEO but in the end they decided not to list on that exchange. I've faced 3-4 projects that have done this and the most common problem is the exchange violated something on the contract and add some rules that are not written on the signed contract.

For IEOs I would say every new thing when launches brighten for sometime but gradually we understand whether it will continue to succeed or not. No doubt IEOs is doing much better than ICOs nowadays but in my opinion IEOs also not a guarantee the success of any project. The project launches on Top exchanges easily sell their coins through IEOs, on the other hand, those who launch their IEOs on unpopular exchanges are failing So its an overall mix response of IEO effectiveness than ICOs.

for the time being maybe IEO is indeed more effective than ICO because investor confidence in the ICO project has declined. but in the history of achievement that has been obtained, ICO is still the best and most successful way to raise funds.

what is IEO, IEO means the initial exchange offering so that mean that if any project launch there coin or token through exchange that we already know then it would be great deal but there is class define what exchange they are choosing perhaps it's good deal for any buyer who bought token directly through exchange without having concern of listing an exchange.

still depends on the ieo  . there will always be weaker ieo's out there but there is also stronger ico's  .

 the number of ico compare to the number of ieo were only big enough and most of those numbers are considered as failed or weak   .

 thats the reason why people think that ieo's are more good enough in terms of investment   .

IEO is not open to the public. You’ll have to be a user of the hosting exchange to participate in the token sale. While ICO allows any contributors to buy the token for sale by sending funds into a specific address, IEO requires contributors/users to buy the token with the exchange’s accounts. IEO can gain popularity or big investors when the exchange is also big and popular. That is why IEO is better than ICOs.

Some times you are right. But i think ICO was better because some false exchanger came into market that team contract with them and after token sell they vanish from market. So i think this is a great problem for crypto market. But if it don't does IEO is better as it directly involved for token sell.

IEO projects cannot always live in the hype of exchanges, they may live on the hype of the exchange at the particular time they were established for a while, but their strength will also be tested after they have successfully launched the project, majority of these IEO project usually see their early breakthrough of fund because of the believe of investors in the exchanges that held them, but what about the real case of the project?

Even if binance had done it thorough investigation to see that the project being proposed will have a real use case, but there is no way that they can test the passion of the team and the strength o the team to see if they will be able to continue the project in future. So IEO too is not completely to be relied  on too much.

Honestly I do not care which method is the best for the developers to raise money, that is their problem, as an investor your problem is to identify a good project that has a real use case and that can eventually become popular among the members of the community, now some may say that it is important that the developers get enough money to develop their projects and that's true but most the time they ask for too much money.

If satoshi could develop bitcoin and not ask a single dollar from anyone why should the developers of a coin that is more limited in scope need 10 or 20 million dollars to develop their project? That doesn't really make sense to me.

Of course, at the moment IEO projects are much better and more profitable than ICO projects, because there is much less fraud in IEO now

It is more effective because IEO listed on the exchange, and if it listed on the top exchange, it will be sold out very quick.
I think it is because many investors trust their exchange so they are willing to buying the IEO.
IEO is reduce scam projects in crypto because they need to be researched by the exchange.

IEO is the fastest way to make a profit because there are so many problems in this market and you cannot be sure what will happen next in the near future. Personally, I would love to invest in IEO at the top exchanges because this is the fastest way to make a profit easily and if you can at a high price then you should do it on the first trading day. I often choose to trade Binance to join IEO and that exchange has never disappointed investors

Yes, IEO is more successful than ICO. We have observed that many projects are becoming failed and many projects scammed from ICO by taking funds and flew away after few days. Hence, IEO are more secure for the investors as it is already listed in exchange.

I joined Roobee IEO and X2 now

From the news that I got indeed IEO is more effective than ICO. Several times I saw in binance that many IEOs also succeeded, but there were also many IEOs that failed in other markets. And until now I have not tried investing in IEO. Before deciding to invest in IEO you should be careful and more careful in choosing IEO because not all IEO is effective.

I don't really care how the money is been raised either through ICO, STO or IEO, what i care about is real projects and how to avoid getting scammed, IEO is only better than ICO because it provides better trusts through bigger exchange platforms

because things like this can happen, to make sure a coin will be listed in a market is important. as some people on this forum have said, be a wise investor. who know what they're going to invest in. I also got things like this in my search. however, although it is more effective than ICO, we also need to search for information about the popular IEO. I've seen a number of IEO's fail, and they didn't even develop after listing in a market. don't think that IEO is better than ICO, so all IEO should be supported. yeah, this is a wrong thought. keep research.

We know that IEO is still a lot of bad but we also have to look for the best I do not believe IEO in Latoken because I know there are so many IEO there but mostly nothing is successful.

Yes IEO is much effective than ICOs but I see this only in terms of security of funds whereby the team can't exit scam ASAP with funds generated, but in terms of long term sustainability of that project it's left to the team. That is to say, many things can happen after IEO, its either the project grows or its dumps. Furthermore, what you pointed about Latoken has been happening with them though, but the latest IEOs in top exchanges get listed on that exchange too. Also, there are projects which run IEO on different exchanges at the end, those exchanges still listed them.

ICOs will always be more effective than IEOs. Just recently IEOs came to play, there isn't much hype about IEOs again. Unlike how long ICOs lasted, IEOs were short lived.

Please join in all IEO programs, as long as it can benefit you, and if I may know, why did you choose to join IEO Roobee and X2 now? Are they very promising? or is there something else that makes you interested in Roobee and X2?

With IEO, since there is also involvement of exchanges, there is less possibility of scam and risk since exchanges also need to increase their user base and increase confidence of existing users.
In ICO there is lack of transparency which affects the fund raising requirements as investors dont have that much confidence.

No doubt about it since the emerging of IEO there we're only few ICO appearing on bounty section, most of the new investment method is promoting via IEO it's the same whether those projects are new or old. as of now, there hasn't been a case where some project that promotes via IEO that runaway with the investor's money. as long as there will be no negative news about it, most of the investors prepare this kind of investment than ICO.

But when those scammers find some hole about this method of investment, they will start their plan to wreck it as they did on ICO.
so my advise to my fellow investors, be aware on what kind of investment you are going to invest because scammers in this industry are well known to have all the tricks on the books to use on us.

I would agree with most of what you had posted. But still, I have doubts regarding some of the IEOs that are ongoing in medium-sized exchanges such as Coineal. They are not screening these IEOs properly and there is a high chance of these projects failing, sometime in the near future. IEO is a relatively new phenomena, and all of its risks and uncertainties are not revealed to the users as of yet.

I agree with you, Latoken has many problems and it is best to be cautious when trading or buying IEO on Latoken.
In my opinion, we should buy IEO on big exchanges like Binance or houbi, this will avoid unnecessary risks.

This is 100 percent true and nothing to be talk about between the two.
ICO days has gone now and many investors are not into ICO now as there were and are so many scammers there.
IEO is much effective and many people are hoping this will be the answer for this community to go back on what we were before.

People are really believe in exchanges, they are good filter. Whats why IEO are so popular

If we look at the process of the fundraising from the effectiveness point, the IEOs suits better the main credentials compare to the weak option for the token sale which is ICOs.The real working product is the main stuff investors look in any project and to be honest, IEOs are a more genuine competitor in this comparison. Nowadays, investors will continue to invest in the usual IEOs on well-known exchanges like Binance, Bitforex, Latoken, and small exchanges will use the reputation of the reputable projects in order to attract a new crowd to their next IEOs.

Yes, it is true that IEOs are much safer and more effective than ICOs. Because the companies have to share their AML in the IEO exchanges, and the fact that the project will be listed on the exchange means that they entered the exchange at the same time.

With the advent of IEO, the amount of scam decreased markedly. It seems to me listed on the exchange will be important for the investor.

Its better to stick with binance ,huobi and gate.io because they carefully picked projects very well before they accept their IEO offers, other exchanges are not doing better researches on projects before accepting them that's why they are not performing very well

I herebly can't see a big difference between ICO and  IEO. The main goal of the both is to raise funds. Even, the exchangers could harm the project if they were a type of an anonymous exchange with unknown team. They can even dump, even if their owners are public, that doesn't refer to the exchangers as a trusted escrow, they might lose the coins/tokens and they might steal them and announce that they have lost them. I truly can't trust a 3rd party to save me and do that role, i neither do trust the team of the ico, i do not trust "humans" to deal with my cash/btc.. An auto-ICO using artificial intellegence might be good for me, lol.

IEO is only accessible and better than ICO when it done through popular exchange platforms like Binance, Bittrex, Huobi. Through the most popular platforms, IEO implementation projects achieve the best results. Projects that implement IEO through low-quality exchanges will not yield better results than traditional ICOs.

Yes and am of the notion that IEO is more effective and a superior option than ICOs not after what we have passed through. However, the only condition I think should be taken care of during participating in any IEO is the exchange; that is, top exchanges makes IEO worth it, because in addition to security, good return is assured. Talking about a project having its IEO in an exchange and didn't later list happen in time past not nowadays; even if it is done on different exchange it will still get listed on both exchanges.

IEO is more popular than ICO because IEO is guaranteed by reputable exchanges. if the IEO scam is that exchange would fall so people are always interested in IEO projects at this time

I've seen a lot of projects who did the same thing on what you've stated in the above. Because of that incident happened that's
the reason why IEO became trend when 2019 came up, were most of the people here in the forum prioritize to look for a project campaign
that will undergo with IEO compare to ICO.

It depends on the terms and policies of the exchange. If they have different requirements from other exchanges it may be because the cost offered is cheaper. But from the IEO being held we can take advantage of the security they guarantee. Because cirulation supply and funds are held by third parties before they are distributed to both parties. Regarding the risks obtained, surely all investments have their own levels of risk, so we must be prepared with the worst-case scenario.

In terms of IEO technology, not much more than ICO, most of the technology and applications of the projects are not working. In terms of investment, IEO is better than ICO because at least IEO is listed on the exchange, there are many ICO projects that cannot even appear on any exchange.

I agree with you . Projects proposed at top exchanges are always welcomed by investors and they are ready to invest at any time if that project starts to open for sale. I think in this market you should consider very carefully if you choose other normal projects because IEO projects at small exchanges are often not profitable for investors. I don't care much about the quality of the project as long as the project is profitable for me I will invest because this crypto market has a lot of lies from the development team.

Not at all because IEO will only become successful if it has cooperation with large and expensive exchanges but if the project use small exchanges then there is a high possibility that the project will not going to success so you must choose carefully before joining.

That lies are very tricky and always been the advantage of the developing team to runaway investors money. IEO's are good if there's developing team who are truly concern and have a good intention to continue and to bring more progress and updates, not alone with listing and start the sale period but also with many progress and usable outcome for the entire project.

I agree that IEO will be good if the developer team thinks about the progress of the project. IEO that comes from a small exchanger sometimes the developer team is only active in the sales period, after the sales period ends, sometimes they do not provide progress of the project so investors are sometimes disappointed with the performance in the market

LA Token is a very good example of a shit exchange. Most of their volume is fake and bot trading! Have a look at their all IEO! Maximum IEO projects are shit there, they listed the shit project on their IEO launchpad by taking a good amount of money, but they don't list them to protect there reputation? I would suggest every IEO investor not to invest in Latoken IEO. IEO is much profitable than ICO but you have to invest in good exchange's IEO!

yes that's right, the presence of IEO has attracted the attention of investors, now almost all fundraising projects prefer to be done at IEO, Bitmax, Kucoin, Binance. they are big exchanges and the reality is investors are more supportive of IEO listed on large exchanges.

Yes, this is one of the risks that many people have to face. Maybe we will be very disappointed and maybe upset because it's like a scam. Be more thorough in determining the IEO project and you should read carefully the project roadmap.

IEO is a great solution for now because the ICO has been a lot of scams. But IEO certainly has advantages and one of them is already on the exchange and we can also do a check. I think if the tokens can be sold out, of course, they will be listed in the exchange. But if not, of course, there is a problem.

true just go look ieo on binance they always old out the ieo and its more effective to gather funds than ico i think almost all investors invest on ieo rather than ico nowdays

We've seen the success of many IEO and no doubt, the truth still remains that IEO is more effective than ICO. While hope is almost lost and investors are not willing to risk their funds into any project, then IEO evolved to be the way out for both investors and projects sourcing for development funds. The industry still needs a more effective approach and will continue to look for the most effective way. But before then, IEO is the way forward.

Most of ICO's was scams in 2018 and now also, due to scams ICO's most of investors not investing in ICO's and some of them investing in IEO but IEO is profitable only launched in good exchange like Binance,OKEX,KUCOIN, and other big exchanges but investing in low ranking exchanges is lost of your money like Latkoken,exmarkest etc that are not good exchanges and don't invest in these exchanges. 

I also think the same as you ... because a lot of VIDEOs are done on an exchange, but at the end they don't list coins on the exchange so that it makes investors and other traders worried they will experience fraud.. and many IEOs are made on large exchanges but at the time of token listing they choose on relatively small exchanges in terms of volume and demand.. they should have listed it in exchange for their token sale.

The IEO rapid success in the early days is what makes people more obsessed to IEO rather than ICO which has a downtrend ever since the beginning of 2018. the IEO itself is a more legit ways of investing into a project rather than ICO which is independently held by the project and no third party to ever check out whether the project is legit or not compared to IEO where the exchange is the one that did the review.
However, it seems that IEO is currently having a downtrend aswell, maybe it's because people are losing hype just like in the end of 2017 and beginning of 2018 where people are losing their hype over cryptos and ICOs.

The truth is that any attempt to raise money from investors is going to face the same problems, altcoin developers have lost the confidence of those that they need the most to develop their projects, and while trust can take a lot of time to build it doesn't really take long to destroy it and that is what they have done, many people blame scammers for the poor situation in which altcoins find themselves to be in and they are correct.

But the developers of most coins are also guilty of losing the trust of investors, after all how many coins do you see in the market? And how many of them have any real chance to challenge one of the major altcoins in the market? Once you answer yourself those questions you understand why altcoins do not seem to recover.

I see that many teams first conduct ICOs, and after some time they systematically conduct IEOs on the stock exchange. Thus, these two types of activities are combined and the result is not bad. The situation with the collection of funds for the initial issue of coins is relatively gloomy due to the fall in the price of altcoins, which for almost two years have actually been in the bear market. However, in any case, all bad periods end sooner or later.

Don't support this exchange when they launched their IEO, this is like deceiving their investors, the investors are confident that the coin will have an automatic listing, if they don't do that then we don't have a reason why we should buy the token on their IEO platform.
Investors are attracted to IEO because it guarantees listing if they broke that guaranty, they will lose supporters.

IEO is really effective now for the inveators to gain money and I prove that because Im a IEO imvestors and becaus eof this I recover my lost from what I lost in the ICO investment that I made last year 2018. I will not considered ICO as effective way for earning money but it can harm only the investors because of the scam project created last year upto this now.

The ICO bubble of 2017 has lost it stands to IEO for ever ;D. Many investors got scammed with projects that had no use case but was just based on pump and dumps. The worst part is that, most of these ICOs even fail to list unto exchanges after the ICO but with IEOs investments are opened to traders on the exchange and the tokens or coins are listed quite early to get more investors on board. These days i would prefer IEO to any ICO.

Its true, IEOs are better because they sell tokens or coins quicker and they list right away which attracts more investors. When you invest in ICOs, you have to wait for exchange agreements as well and it is really annoying for investors and also bounty hunters as well. I prefer IEOs to be honest even if they are not as profitable as before.

even safer we buy tokens on the exchange, indeed this means not waiting for an agreement for the listing. and many large exchanges directly participate. and finally this can be proven from the number of investors who have moved on IEO investments at this time

Now that ICO are no longer encouraged in investment and current ICO projects have very little investment capital, this will greatly affect that project. I think by the end of this year we will end the period of ICO dominance and enter another form of investment. IEO is currently a new trend for all investors and these projects always have great guarantees at the exchanges that the project lists.

Of course IEO still has its own risks if the project is a poor project and the only reason IEO fails is that they are not eligible to be listed at a big exchange. At this point only 5% IEO helps you make good profits and the remaining 95% are all projects with no clear development plans.

There is terms & conditions for every exchange about IEO. They state about IEO that might or might not list token after IEO sell. For example Binace doesn't give any guaranty that they will list token after IEO sell. But usually they are listing them, otherwise investors will not buy token for next IEO. Yes, there is some exchange who guaranty that they will listed for trading. I don't see any point why an exchange should launch IEO if they don't like to list coin. Users should avoid such as exchange, they will not loss their funds.

yes, I agree with you, as we have seen since the emergence of IEO has attracted the attention of investors, especially ICO investors have started to switch to investing in IEO which is listed on large exchanges. but I wouldn't say ICO is bad, it's just that now ICO's reputation has collapsed and there are a lot of fraud in ICO. and that starts from 2018 until this year

IEO has become a real alternative to ICO. IEOs provide an increased level of confidence in cryptocurrency projects, so I truly believe that IEOs can become the standard model for fundraising in the crypto space and, possibly, even create the next fundraising boom.

Not only big investors but almost all investors prefer IEO. Actually there is no big difference but the small difference has caused the majority to choose it. Rather than small differences, it is the reason IEO is preferred because it makes good profits at exchanges like Binance. IMO if Binance had offered ICO instead of IEO, it would have been successful too.

At the moment there are very few ICOs that can appeal to investors, most people have a negative attitude to ICOs because there are so many junk ICo and scams.
IEO is a good investment channel right now, but you should only invest in IEOs at reputable exchanges, not invest IEO in exchanges that are too small.

I would trade at the older exchanges because some places don't like to payout their coins immediately.

Very very effective, Investors are not throwing any money to ICO as there is so many scams in the community.
IEO will give assurance that the money is safe and there will be exchange after the sales.
IF the IEO will place in a big exchange another percentage will add to victory.

I think that it is not that effective because people are used to doing the ICO not IEO.

I can say that IEO is the trend now i like it compare to ICO because it gives much assurance to traders the 99% return of investment
but it seems that IEOs raised smaller amounts than what ICOs did raised during its peak. EOS was the most successful ICO producing $4 Billion.

The model has just been changed but investors should always check what they are buying even if the projects are listed on top exchanges. Because after you got your coins your on your own and exchanges have no direct responsibility of every projects they lists.

I have to agree with this. IEO is very efficient compare to ICO because you don't need to spend more money to just spread awareness about your ICO because when you do IEO you just need to contact an exchange and do some contract and they will do the speaking for you. You will get benefit from the popularity of the exchange and it is also fast since after the IEO it is already there in the exchange, waiting for the traders to buy and sell.

Again, it's because we need to evolved and that's why the IEO business model is born. But make no mistakes about it, IEO can still be prone to manipulation and can be delisted anytime soon. Even Binance delisted some of it's IEO being launch on their platform.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/binance-delists-trading-pairs-some-include-tokens-from-its-launchpad

So it's not an assurance that they are going to remain in the cryptosphere and not to be used as pump and dump as well.

It is very normal that IEOs are much more effective than ICOs nowadays.  How many scam ICOs we saw in the market? Many people put their money on ICOs and get nothing. Also after ICOs project team did anything for improving their projects.

As we now around 650 projects did not add even one single code to their projects.
With IEO you can trust the exchange. Exchanges will be first face of IEO projects to the investors. So exchanges will be responsible also from the IEO projects.

Now IEOs are popular and I believe that in near future ICOs will death completely.

IEO's have a broader support from the community after those several offers from big exchange like binance and huobi attracts more participants.
The success switch between ICO's to IEO's hopeful supporters waits for much quicker results.

Developers begins to workout with this new field of investment, and try to adopt how the system will benefits their projects.

IEO is the best way for people to know your project and this is really good if the project is listed at the top exchanges. In my opinion, we should consider carefully before investing in IEO because there are many fraudulent IEO projects and you cannot be sure of anything when joining IEO. The best advice now is to only join IEO at major exchanges like Kucoin, Binance, Okex, Huobi, Bitmax because these are the top 5 exchanges that can help you earn good profits.

So you're saying that it's even harder to scam people now?

In terms of security, IEO is relatively better than ICO or STO especially if the exchange holding the said crowdfunding scheme has a good reputation. Convenience-wise, IEO is also better since the exchange facilitating the token sale will instantly list the token on its platform once the crowdfunding has concluded. However, not all platforms are perfect. Given that a majority of cryptocurrency exchanges are centralized, there is the possibility of them getting hacked. Also, since they are not decentralized, they take fees for facilitating the token sale. We believe another feasible option is creating an investment protection mechanism for maintaining ICO security (https://adncoin.com) and quality.

Only certain IEOs are better, for example, if you participate in an IEO on Latoken, Probit or another shitty exchange, the outcomes could be the same as by joining a scam ICO. They are not filtering out listed token sales.

Are they still alive - IEO, ICO and so on? Check this https://ethresear.ch/t/public-interest-projects-a-fully-onchain-risk-minimized-seed-funding-mechanism/5977. It is a new way of funding by using DeFi projects such as Compund. It removes the risk of losing your investment. It will probably do some noise in future. Vitalik spoke about it last week in Seoul.

People are smart but wise scammers are smarter than average people. Some facts never change the consequences, if there are scammers it means there will be always a victims in all industries. In the ICOs, it was easier to scam people due to the lack of regulation and no threat by the government in such cases.  Police can't track the scammers because of the anonymity of transactions in the blockchain.

IEO's have certain pro's and con's but it's definitely true that IEO is way a lot more effective than ICO these days. ICO's don't guarantee you that you will get the tokens that you've invested on, comparing it to IEO's where it provides us investors more security and liquidity. Though there are still fallbacks which makes IEO limited, and one of them is the entry point being so expensive. Micro token offerings (http://tokenprotocol.io?utm_source=lx) are solving that as you can get unlocked tokens on a discounted price without spending that much. It's not yet that known but it's another alternative if you don't have that much to spend yet.


Regardless of what ways of fundraising you're gonna participate on, it's always best to DYOR and understand if the project in that offering/IEO/MTO will deliver. Especially if you're the type of investor that is in it for the long-term.

It is because exchange do the marketing, manage the token sale, KYC and brings credibility to the token sale.
Would you trust some ICO to check your personal documents?

Yes, ieos are better than icos now. Cause in icos the trust factor is very less. There are lots of scams and failed project. But ieos comes with some good names like some big exchanges so for investors its more trust worthy.

after a lot of popping up IEO people will choose to join IEO in which exchange.
of course they see the average IEO results from various exchanges, I also don't know why Latoken made such regulations.
and I think IEO binance is the most profitable when the IEO trend starts to go up,
But at this time the position of IEO in all markets is almost the same, just how investors react to it and see how big the project potential is.

ICO has not been launched recently at all, only raising funds. and they collect small amounts because people have stopped investing in ICO projects. trust IEO longer, as there is some piece of software by the exchange

Exactly, most of the people lose patience towards ICO's because a lot of scams happening in the last year. That's why many people are showing interest towards the IEO, mainly focusing on the higher volumes which those exchanges are giving very good profit to the investors. We should always safeguard our money by investing in Higher volume exchanges.

IEOs from exchanges such as latoken and the like are hard to believe, because they are strange exchanges that I think don't do due diligence too, just look at this https://latoken.com/id/ico/ETH from dozens of IEOs are just a few in my opinion, what is clear is the rest I think is strange projects and scams so I think exchanges like this should be avoided.

Not all IEOs are good, be selective. Investing in IEO at a time of market decline means you will not be able to make a lot of profit in the long run unlike you think it will be profitable, most investors choose BTC over IEO.

This is precisely my problem, many people are talking about ieos and how much better they are when compared to icos and yet their success rate does not seem to be that much better than the success rate of icos, why any investor would like to invest in such projects when the chances of losing their money are that high? Maybe I am missing something so I would like to know what do you see in ieos.

The only advantages that I see are that exchanges will try to verify the identity of the developers and you will have a place to trade those coins almost immediately but besides that ieos are very similar to icos.

yes you're right, besides the support of the exchange, there is no difference between IEO and ICO. but still investors prefer IEO, moreover IEO is in a big exchange. the only reason I know why many investors prefer IEO, is because they are tired of being cheated. many ICO projects last year ended in fraud and the rest failed. and that's why IEO is the last resort for those who want to invest.

Sure, IEO has overcome some flaws in ICO but still keeps some uncertainty of listing which was the case for ICO as well.
There is no garunty that the IEO organising exchange will list same projects tokens. But this is only for say 10%of projects. So most of the time we are sure that IEO holding exchange itself will list the project tokens.

whether or not it seems effective depends on the aspects and viewpoints used. for investors, it seems pretty good this IEO system. but in terms of successful project growth and investment in crypto is still very small. there are very few successful projects with IEO., in fact, most end up the same as ICO with a project scam.
IEO must provide new alternatives to grow demand and investment in new projects. because it can make trade and markets increase rapidly.

I agree with you because a lot of token sales through IEO in one of the exchanges like the LATOKEN exchange you mentioned and the sale of tokens are very effective, but many ALtcoins don't list their tokens in that exchange. they should make an IEO there and register for trade in the same market ... so that traders and investors can trade directly in that market.

as an alternative to ICO, I think IEO is already good. but as a solution to increase the adoption of new project investments, it seems like it hasn't happened yet. IEO is widely used in current projects. and most also end up not good, because the exchanges used are not very good. whereas to be registered in a large exchange would require expensive fees.

Lot of investors now more smart about investment in project like ICO/IEO anything, but personally when there want participate investment in IEO then there want choice larger exchange. IEO will not be successful in lower volume exchange that's means profitable successful IEO need good higher exchange.

True, but not as popular as ICO was back in the days, IEO hype is limited and only few investors are investing on them, we lost lots of investors since ICO became a disappointed investment plan, maybe in time IEO will prove to be a better version of ICO and many more investors will start considering IEO investment option

IEO is not as booming as before,  there is now a down thrend on the rate at which IEO projects reaches soft or hard cap,  majority of new IEO projects are trading much more than their initial price when being listed on an exchange

I join only ieo's because the exchange is really important for me. i dont want to wait months for exchange agreements, some projects test our patience really. we wait for months and they come up with a shitty exchange and they dump the price, and project is simply dead. i dont want this to happen so i only join good projects' sales on good exchanges.

Even though IEO does have the advantage of ICO, not all IEO will really give you an advantage. Yes, some of the IEO does not list on the market when the sale is finished, because there is an agreement before they do IEO there. whether it's because it didn't reach a soft cap, or there is a specific date for the list, we will never know it before doing in-depth research.

some people also look at IEO from their exchanges. A good IEO exchange has a great success rate because it affects the quality of the market. Some important points before choosing IEO are, get to know the project by doing research, and see where the exchange is popular or not.

Even though ICO is currently in a bad condition because of the many scam projects, many of us are considering switching to IEO, but for me now I prefer to stay on the ICO project because I still have hope to get back on my feet, and in IEO there are still some things that we cannot rely on so at this time are still unsure of IEO.

According to the latest analysis, only 5% of the IEO available in the market can be profitable for you because now most IEO projects are very risky and cannot know exactly which projects are potential. I think this investment should only be for large exchanges because it's a place where many big investors gather and can help you with higher liquidity. Of course not everyone has the opportunity to join IEO because many good projects have great competition.

Over the next few years IEO will continue to be an investment trend for everyone but before investing, consider it carefully because any project that you participate in is at its own risk.

The sale of IEO tokens in an exchange (Latoken) does not specify that the token will be registered in Latoken exchanges as well. They only sell tokens to Latoken, but not to exchange. It could be that IEO tokens sold from Latoken will be listed on other exchanges. You are just too late to understand about this.

Many a times these exchanges never list these coins after their IEO. A very few of this exchange measure up to accept the project IEO in their exchange. This was also there in the case of ICOs, so, for me, the percentage of projects listed after their IEO are much higher than that of the ICOs days.
Scammed projects still surface even though things have change from ICO to IEO. Personally, IEO is.more effective than the ICO.

There is no doubt IEOs are better than ICOs because IEOs are hosted on respectable top tier exchanges. IEOs have a good whitepaper, good team of developers with a great background and hosted on live exchanges. without proper team and management, there is no way an IEO can get listed on the live exchange. IEOs are better so stay away from ICOs they are full of scams these days.

Is just popular and easier when big exchange host the IEO Most investor base their trust on the exchange reputations and so your legitimacy concern is mostly handled and attacked by your dearest exchange You are just left with finding out how to run your business

I am of the opinion that IEO will also be like ICO right now after IEO is not profitable with small ROI, I think IEO will lose their investors.
All of this is about hype and money, in the end.

I think the only difference here is on which platform it runs its crowdsale, when it comes to the determining the team's capability or how its whitepaper is done, we cannot tell right away that its good because we need to see first on how the team will carry its plan into action.

The main point only why people leave ICO is because they found a safer way to invest which is IEO.
if its in reputable exchange, they will feel its safer, so it's normal that we are seeing now people are investing in Binance IEO.

IEO is much more effective than ICO. Because of the scams. People are more trusting the exchange rather than giving of their trust to people that are working on their project.

Take note that IEO could be so much more effective if you will put a project to a well known exchange with high volumes. Since high liquidity, could give higher value to coins.

In the end, IEO will also experience boredom like ICO. Investors will look for other ways to get profits if IEO does not provide maximum results. Investors are now more selective in choosing new projects. But for now, IEO is still considered effective.

Huh? really? cos binance have delivered the best IEO projects of this year so far, you should try look at the chart of returns on those IEO projects from binance, and there is something you excluded about ICO, at that time when ICO gives investors huge return its because of the bullrun, now IEO still manages to bring that huge ROI to investors with no bullrun anywhere what do you expect if we are in altcoin season?

True, but for now investors are still choosing IEO for their investment fields, even if there will be another more profitable way, but for IEO will also be considered by investors if the IEO is made in a well-known or large exchange.

IEO surely much more effective than ICO, but i think now DeFi concept much more hyped and interested than even IEO don't u think so ?

sure defi is much interesting than both ieo and ico)) personally i actively research nice defi projects everyday) and dex projects are in the 1st point of interest

it is interesting but they are more interested on stealing our money. to be honest it is really rare to see a good defi project nowadays, all the new defi projects sound the same and they bring nothing to the world. unless you are really sure about the defi projects you are investing on then go ahead, it is really difficult to find one you know

Due to the massive rate of ICO projects is what led to IEO, ICO's were only good to invest in back then in 2017 not anymore, and so far IEO has been doing exceedingly well, but IEO on exchanges like lakoten is a no go area for me, I don't participate in IEO's that are done on shady exchanges like lakoten, vindax, p2pb2b etc those exchanges have bad reputation and its bad for a new token to list there, while IEO's on top exchanges like binance or OKEx are worth participating in, cause the token can go 3x easily after been listed there.

in this case did u see Xsigma project? stablecoin dex. looks credible and they announced just few days ago

ICO or IEO if you compare it with DEFI it is very different, IEO or ICO is a fundraising program,
and DeFi is a financial program, if you debate about whether IEO is more effective now?
the answer is correct, because look how the IEOs are progressing on Binance, everyone has a positive ROI.

indeed a lot of Ieo was held. but nearly 90% of IEOs are now at risk. especially if the IEO is held in a small market with little liquidity. I myself will participate in the IEO when it is held in the top 10 exchanges.

IEOs are much more effective than ICOs. IEOs are moving forward based on demand in the case of exchanges their value is increasing a lot and investors are benefiting a lot. ICO projects are mostly scammed their demand in the market is much less tokens have no value exchanges, it is very difficult to raise funds that is why everyone is leaning towards IEO projects. But as the market improves many ICO projects are trying to improve them defi projects are in a good position in the market.

Until now, I see nothing good like ICO in 2017, neither IEO nor Defi, but I think IEO is better than Defi, Defi only uses pump and dump moments, and it is very risky to your assets. I personally don't like investing in Defi project because of the high risk.

The success rate of IEOs depend a lot on the exchange platform in which it is being launched. Exchanges such as Binance necessitates very strict screening requirements and less promising projects are weeded out at this stage. However, medium-tier exchanges such as LAToken are not that strict when it comes to screening. All they care about is the money and many of these exchanges allow dubious projects in their platform. 

That's just a view of some people, but if we look at everything that has happened IEO is also very popular even though at this time it has been replaced by DeFi for a while, because everyone will not know what will happen to DeFi in the future

I personally am not sure that DeFi will always be the best in the long term, because every year there are always new things that are born and that can affect things that have long existed in crypto, for example such as IEOs and ICOs in crypto.

Hmm, that's new, how can a exchange accept IEO crowdfunding on their platform for a new project and end up not listing the project for trading? There must be a broken deal between the project and the exchange team members for that to have happened, anyways, Latoken isn't a reliable exchange anymore though, the exchange is a bad news for any projects that use it for fundraising, fake Volumes and bad customer service, need to be avoided

I know there is a project whose IEO is held at LAtoken but after the IEO period ends, the token is not listed on the exchanger because the developer team argues that the exchanger looks illegitimate to them. Now the Token is listed on Hotbit. This may be a new case and in my opinion this can happen if there is an agreement which according to both parties there is something strange in the future

Many people don't believe in LAToken, maybe this is because the community of the project asks not to be listed on the exchanger. Binance is already well-known among crypto investors and they certainly won't risk its reputation for hosting IEOs for obscure projects.

I've been on a project team for IEO, and I just want to share that they clearly spend around 2-3 BTC for the coin to be listed on an exchanger platform, and it's not an instant process, you still need qualifications. I don't think fraud projects would risk that huge funds. IEO is reputed for being the "less risky investment" than ICO in the crypto space, that's why it gets more demand from the community.

in my opinion, IEO is far from ICO on the success ladder. fine, project that did ieo get listed on exchange almost immediately but many of this project have little to no liquidity on those exchanges. also looking at statistics, ico has contributed more successful and great projects to the crypto world than ieo

In as much as i like to agree that IEOs are way better than ICOs, its still disheartening that we still experience scam even in IEO projects and the exchanges that conducted the IEO cant be held responsible for reason i dont know, and i also like to say that its unlikely that an exchange will launch an IEO and at the end, will not list the token or coin, that is a clear sign of scam if am asked and such project should be strongly avoided to avoid stories that touch.

IEOs is sure the way to go but at this time, it still need some perfecting and with the advancement of crypto, scams in IEO will soon be a thing of the past.

yes, i saw them and looking to invest, like their financial model

All answers are in the top exchange and scam exchanges. Top exchanges never break their promise when scam exchanges can do it. Actually, we don't trust any new websites to make investments ( without any big partnership). IEO is just increasing trust in new projects. Even some investors don't care about the projects just take advantage of the initial price.

We all know that IEO is more effective and safer nowadays than ICO but we need more than IEO crowdfunding in crypto space, now I haven't seen any new IEO from binance exchange or other top exchanges, it's annoying, new projects that can't afford to use top exchanges for crowdfunding are still left out, it wasn't like this when ICO was still here, there was no difference between big or small projects, they all equally raise funds successfully, I hope such can come back

The only thing that makes IEO better than ICO is assurance of scam free by top exchanges, there is zero danger investing in IEO projects from top exchanges like binance, Okex, gate, huobi etc, they only way to get scammed or lose funds while investing in IEO projects is trusting small exchanges like Latoken, P2PB2B, Uniswap etc, for correct results from IEO top exchanges holds the key

When you participate in the ICO you need to wait a little bit longer before the token will get listed on a good exchange while participating in IEO you are sure where will it get listed after the IEO and you can get back the ROI right away. So I think that's the reason why IEO is much effective than ICO now.

OP talking about the good side of IEO compared to ICO and not about risking both, both IEO and ICO are fundraising types that have resonated in the market. According to the OP, the IEO will be more effective, i think it is not wrong, not completely true because IEOs only on good exchanges have the potential to bring great returns to investors, if as IEO projects on LA, P2pb2b, consbit,... i believe in the failure of those projects in this field.

I don’t know what is the difference of IEO and ICO, because before we only participate in ICO and then i stopped for 1 year and a half. Then IEO was born, it seems that IEO is much effective than ICO just like what everybody said, I guess I’m gonna participate one of these days.

The difference between IEO and ICO is, IEO system that all Investor funds are fully held by the exchange, depending on the project they want to list on which exchange they want, either big exchange or small exchange, and all funds will be raised until the end of the campaign, if compared with ICO all Investor funds are fully held by the project and can be misused at any time, if the project has malicious intent or fraud, all funds can be taken away by the project, indeed not all ICO projects are fraudulent, but in recent years it has often been There was fraud in the ICO project, the IEO System was used to attract investors to return to investing safely, so in recent years IEOs are being developed by several projects.

As far as I am like that, if there is an error please correct it .. !!

IEO is more effective compared to ICO. because the IEO token has been registered in the exchange. But I would indeed invest in IEO
if they sold it on a very reliable exchange, such as Binance, Kucoin and other exchanges that are already popular and reliable.
But in addition it is very important to know the vision and mission to know the potential of the coin in the future.
So we really get the benefits in the long term.

I trust IEO over ICO. Nowadays crypto running under IEO has an impression that owners behind it has a money. They are willing to pay exchanges to list their site for IEO. While most scam started as ICO where the promotion and marketing of coin relies only on bounties. And there is no assurance that they will list your invested coins in ICO in exchanges.

Of course, IEOs are very popular now and the most important thing is that you can invest in IEOs on the top exchanges and get great profit from this, but investing in ICOs is a huge risk because most companies that conduct ICOs are of course a scam, but big exchanges like Binance very carefully check every cryptocurrency company that conducts IEO on their exchange.

Yep, the thing that investors are looking for to choose an IEO is that they don't have to worry anymore about where to sell their tokens, for the possibility that the timeline or project roadmap will fail, of course, it's still the same as an ICO (if the project is a start up). There is still a possibility of a scam.

But for IEOs I think they are superior in strength, where they will cooperate with big exchangers like Binance, Ku Coin, Bittrex or others, which then this will bring in more money from investors.

The main requirement for their project is that raising money will be easier than an ICO.

Almost IEO most popular I think still benefit with ICO project because many investor get much profit from investing on ICO, we know IEO is drama only for developer and exchange owner because when coin sold out price always down under IEO although listed on Binance. You can check how many IEO success and down after listing and many investor make panic when hearing with IEO. but now but ICO and IEO have down and never get any interested again for investor to buy on ICO or IEO, now many of investor waiting when listing on exchange to invest on some coin than have to buy on ICO or IEO.

Yes, but if someone is always afraid of making risks in crypto, then at any time he will not get anything here, because in crypto everyone must always be ready to work and that is definitely based on strong research and analysis of all things.

i would not say latoken is a medium-tier exchange, i would say latoken is low-tier exchange or they belong to shit-tier exchange. if the exchanges only care about nothing but money then i wont even bother to make a trade on that exchange, you wont get anything when trading on that exchange and if a new project lists their tokens on that, then i would not advise to invest into that

Before IEO popular ICO have been the first investment way make many investors rich with buying coin during ICO on lower price than giving much bonus at the first time buying and sell on higher price after listing, just one year ICO success create many good coin and now have listed on bigger exchange market, then after ICO have many bad thing with lower price after listing create new investment kinds with IEO, coin have listed on exchange market as buy only not available for selling because any project working with big exchange like Binance to make IEO, many IEO success with 10x have higher price until get new IEO coin listing again but drop price.

I'm sure that exchange has no idea about the project they're supported because if they distribute the token and they not list on their exchange that is useless they scam the investors and we can complain them to authorities so the legal action will condemn them and they will need to refund our money if we participate. And teach them to investigate first the project they wanted to support or to promote on their exchange.

it can be said that IEOs are more successful than ICOs in 2019, at that time there were many IEO projects listed on the top exchanges successful and sold out ... besides that we have also observed that many projects fail and many projects are cheated from ICOs by took out the funds and disappeared after a few days.

From inception, IEO has proven to more effective than ICO I guess part of this is because exchanges hosts IEO. But recently there has been a decline and in comes scam exchanges with fake everything including fake buyers. This has also made investors lose a lot of money with the wave of new projects out there right now

If you just look at the comparison last year (2019), then obviously IEOs are much better, because that year IEOs were in a good trend, but let's look at the comparison in 2017 where ICOs were better and IEOs weren't born at the time that, this is to make two comparisons that I think are more equal.

IEOs are much better compared to the ICO's for different reasons. Here one thing need to be discussed is the profiting. Out of ICO the cryptocurrency users made a big profit, but the same isn't possible with IEO. This is all because of the investment opportunity. Most of the time IEO investment gets limited. So everyone won't be getting the opportunity, only the few with the highest investment ability profit out of it.

Yes you are right, IEO is much more effective than ICO nowadays. Coins do IEO before listing in the market. IEO sells at a good price. But when the trade starts, the token no longer has the IEO price. Investors are very risk averse. The tokens that are given to their hunters start selling at that time. But there are some projects that are giving good profit to IEO investors.

The credibility of the exchange also greatly influences the outcome of the IEO. it is true that IEO is the best fund rising crypto procedure at this time, but in certain cases if a project will only conduct IEO on exchanges whose credibility is questionable, I think it will no longer be a good fundraising strategy.

Of course all crypto users will choose IEOs over ICO, ICO reputation is already very bad in the eyes of investors but for me IEO cannot be guaranteed to be profitable many IEO  also provide losses for investors usually occurs in IEOs in small markets so my advice if you want to invest in IEO look for IEO in big market like Binance

In some aspects this is true that IEO is much better and more effective than ICO knowing that there is a very bad reputation of mostly several ICO from the previous years however even IEO cannot really gave assurance for the investors that they can gain and earn.

We as a whole realize that IEO is more compelling and more secure these days than ICO but we need more than IEO crowdfunding in crypto space, presently I haven't seen any new IEO from binance exchange or other top exchanges, it's irritating, new projects that can't bear to utilize top exchanges for crowdfunding are still forgotten about, it wasn't like for this when ICO was still here, there was no difference between enormous or little projects, they all similarly raise money effectively.

IEO just guarantee with exchange listing only but not giving perfect promise with coin have value above IEO price, look how many IEO coins scam on Binance after listing lower price than IEO price. Did you remember with PERLIN coin was listed as IEO on binance, what happen next after coin listing and available to trade on Binance price is dump from 0.2$ as IEO price bit when trading PERL have lower price and dump to be 0.0318$, lest imagine which have have most safety IEO than ICO with price most extremely dump and how much developer and exchange owner get much money from investor.

Agree that being listed in the first place opens up opportunity and bigger chance of making profits for the investors.
With ICO usually you never think about making profit first because getting listed into an exchange is already hard but with IEO we got that guarantee by the exchange.

We should still not underestimate ICO though as some of them still turns out to be better than the IEO. Not partnering wtih exchange doesn't automatically make it bad.

Of cos IEO is more reliable, the only thing that can make investors lose money when investing in IEO projects is to choose projects from small exchanges like P2PB2B or Latoken, these type of small exchanges always have bad results on projects, it's better to stay away from such exchanges if you want good results

p2pb and latoken are not that small  and if investing in ieo in bigger exchange cant guarantee a loss,  all of the ieo trader must be rich now but why ieo are less heard  ? and there are still poor investors/traders and most of them are also involved in ieo before .

its not in the exchange but its how you chose an ieo project because if you didnt know how to choose a good ieo you will still loose even if you only pick ieo in good exchange but success rate of ieo can be better than ico

I don't think about the dealers/speculators since I don't accepting any new IEO ventures and I would prefer not to hazard my cash to put resources into the new task. We will imagine that this coin will be intrigued, promising, or beneficial or not seen by the improvement of the exchanging volume on the trade. In any case, it isn't sufficient.

Bad exchange and not guarantee with your money back if you try to buy on IEO coin list on latoken and p2bp exchange, I know how many coins become scam after listing there by have separated buy and sell order, we can find how far away different between sell and buy order when coin listing on both exchange latoken and p2bp. How if you forget with IEO coin and try to get profit by trading or investing only bigger coin like ethereum, ripple and litecoin but if you wanna try with short term trading you can buy new coin have good news exactly on uniswap listing coin.

Yes that's right. There was a time when people liked the ico investment. But for many reasons icos went straight dead. The reasons were scamming investors, less development sometimes devs leave the project in midway. So investors nstarted to back off from this kind of investment. Son in 2018-2019 the whole iconic thing is kind of dead. Then from mid 2019 there comes a new investment strategy undated ico uts called ieo. The risk factors in iros are very less. If you invest in right ieos. The ieos started to give good profits mostly those which are offered by the big exchanges like binance.

This IEO seems to be designed only for those who make big investments so they deserve a big profit, it doesn't seem like this applies to bounty hunters. So there are positive and negative sides to the IEO and it depends on us seeing from which point of view is the best

In 2017 almost all ICO projects raised money because too much money keeps flowing into ICO projects at the time, it's just a shame that many projects turned out scam after ICO hype was over, If IEO came out before ICO I'm sure we will still have millions of investors in crypto space today because IEO did maintain it's reputation through top exchanges

Every years have new way with investment and only get success in short time, when the era or ICO or IEO have end you need looking for new way how to get faster rich in cryptocurrency, right now many time investor get lucky with new coin listing on UNISWAP, they can take profit more than 300% when buying coin above $5 and sell it above $20 and reach above $100, but when late for investing they will get loss because coin on uniswap is not guarantee for higher price in long term, just few days price could be drop more than 40% and any coin drop above 300%.

That's true most of the time unless the exchange is some obscure exchange which none of us know its credibility.
IEO is good only if it comes out of reputable exchange otherwise it's the same as ICO which may have some risks.

However, ICO if could get listed to reputable exchange despite having no partnership or relation with the exchange means it could make it really big compared to IEO.

Yes, that is if the IEOs that are on the top exchanges will obviously maintain their reputation to defend themselves, but if the IEOs that are on the exchanges are scam, I don't think they will maintain their reputation through the exchange, because their goal is to take away all the money from investors.

Of course they are effective since there is a guaranteed exchange for the token holders unlike ICO when it was not listed on exchange you just wasted your money to it but if you invest on IEO at anytime you can liquify your tokens.

IEO is currently claimed to be safer than ICO and of course more effective than ICO, for large exchanges such as the Launchpad IEO binance it is more recommended than Latoken, which in fact has a small trading volume.

Claimed IEO more safety than ICO because have guarantee with exchange for listing only and not give guarantee how price will be above IEO or lower than IEO, just the opinion why many investors look interested with update time when listing and how long IEO running, positive points from IEO because they can sold coin just few time not the same with ICO waiting more than one or two week to sold out coin and some time have added with ICO time selling because coins not sold out, just the positive side from ICO and IEO but now both investment way IEO and ICO have ended with always failed listing on higher price.

Point of correction, the bounty hunters sometimes enjoy this huge profit from promoting project on this forum, there are current projects be promoting that are likely to get into the IEO, so, this isn't just for bigger investors only (ie) the IEO. In the past, i did some promotion on this platform that eventually fell into IEO, this project brought me fortunes that am yet to account fully. The truth is: IEO is much far better than the ICO, becasue the IEO get involve with cryptocurrency exchanges.

IEO sensation is happening in 2019 and now we are in 2020 where most of the Defi market is entering the cryptoqurrency space and it is also full of scams. Defi has attracted a huge market sensation as well as gross profits from its investors. ICO still exists, IEO also still exists but be careful with Defi too.

IEO is more effective for keeping investors funds safer is all I see here, when it comes to higher ROI ICO is or was more effective in this part, IEO is less Profitable than ICO and that's why I missed those ICO days, I'm still looking forward to a new crowdfunding idea that will do better than IEO, it seems that MakerDao fundraising is making lot of sense lately

IEO will be effective if held on legitimate exchanges. Since the IEO hype last year, new exchanges were developed and people don't really care about the background and credibility of the exchanges. As a result, the fraudulent play couldn't be avoided between the organizer and the team which resulted in tarnishing the IEO effectiveness over time.

IEO just guarantee with exchange only and not give most effective with price higher above IEO, maybe you can check with perli listed on binance as IEO exchange and dump more than 50% from IEO price, so although have exact with exchange listing is not give us promise will profit always on IEO, I think most likely for investing with ICO although still not which one exchange for listing when ICO ended because at the first time purchasing on ICO we got bigger bonus more than 50% and we can double coin reward when listing, then we can sell to the other investor when ICO have sold out exactly with higher price.

IEOs are no longer as popular as they were in 2019, but currently there are still many IEOs going on and a little advice if you want to take part in IEOs then choose IEOs listed on Kucoin or Binance. there are some of the top IEO choices and at least minimize your risk of loss too.

IEO is something like an agreement between project developers and exchanges for the initial placement of a token. Instead of hiding the nature of ICO listing on exchanges and questionable dynamics between projects. I believe that IEO is a more reliable token offering.

^ IEO is supported more because it is listed on an exchange. however, not all exchanges can be trusted to successfully to handle IEOs. IEOs listed on Binance, kucoin, or bitforex will be much more desirable than IEOs held on Latoken.

Mainly the reason is why numerous speculators lean toward to select IEO is that the token or the coin has been recorded on the trade. We are going think that this coin will be interested, promising, or beneficial or not seen by the advance of the exchanging volume on the trade. Be that as it may, it isn't sufficient. It needs advance information and inquire about on the coin itself, the group, additionally the trade where they list the coins. Therefore it is anticipated to all dealers or speculators ought to be more careful in deciding ventures. Whether to invest in ICO or too within the IEO. Since without taking under consideration the exchange done will get a misfortune.

Yup, IEOs are the best fund raising methods but recently they are over shadowed by IDOs and liquidity based projects because most new projects are based on defi, the conclusive thing is that all these methods are highly risky and nothing can be guaranteed.

of course dude because LATOKEN is an exchange with a lot of very bad reputation, I will also remind everyone to avoid IEOs done on P2PB2B, LATOKEN, vindax and some new exchanges

At this moment of time yes. Ieos are very much popular now. It's also very profitable. There was a time when icos were very popular. Almost everyone wanted to invest in the icos. But for some reasons ieos started to go down. Most of the ics started to scam people and investors. And they also leave the project at the middle way. So people and investors started to avoid icos. And after some time ieos take the market. And it's more secure than icos. The risk factor is very low. So people like it. And if you join in big exchanges ieos the profit margin you will get is very high too.

It is not just the trading volume that needs to be taken in to account. Binance has maintained a good reputation as far as the IEOs are concerned. They do careful screening of the projects and if they feel something is not right, then the permission is not given for listing. Latoken also does some preliminary screening, but their process is not error-free, as we have seen from a few cases where the investors were scammed.

When it comes to IEO top exchanges reputation speaks louder than other small exchanges and investors have learn that top exchanges owns the path to IEO success, trust is been restored through IEO, there is no risk of losing money or not making any profit at all unless you choose projects that plan to use small exchanges for IEO which may results into unsatisfied results

I see that numerous groups first lead ICOs, and after some time they deliberately direct IEOs on the stock exchange. Hence, these two kinds of exercises are consolidated and the outcome isn't terrible. The circumstance with the assortment of assets for the underlying issue of coins is moderately miserable because of the fall in the price of altcoins, which for right around two years have really been in the bear market. Notwithstanding, regardless, all awful periods end at some point or another.
The most noticeably terrible part is that, the vast majority of these ICOs even neglect to list unto exchanges after the ICO yet with IEOs investments are opened to traders on the exchange and the tokens or coins are listed very right on time to get more investors ready.

IEO is much better than ICO, it is true. But how secure it is, depends on many things. We should learn what is the plan of the project team through the roadmap. Also, we need to ensure that the team of the project can be trustable. How do we know they are trustable? We must get information from many sources about the identities of the team members and their track records. Don't forget, Whitepaper should be okay and no problem there. Well, it is a complex analysis to determine the security to join an IEO.

Regarding Latoken, it is not a big exchange, so don't be so surprised if there is a bad project to have IEO there. If the projects have IEOs on top exchanges, commonly they will list their tokens there as well. I suggest choosing the projects which provide IEOs on top exchanges if you want to be more secure buying and holding the tokens.

I agree with that suggestion, and I think many are using that suggestion. however, personally, I also find it easier to research IEO than ICOs. To find security, I only choose IEO in big markets like Binance, Kucoin, and other big markets. So far, the information I got, most of the IEO that are done there, the price is sometimes quite high, and it is above the IEO price. After seeing where the IEO takes place, I'll take a look at the concept and team behind the project.

People's trust has indeed declined about IEOs. It's all also because their Exchange recklessly accepts the proposal of each Project without further seeing whether this is a potential scam or not. Since 1 year, I have seen IEOs from average project scam. They experience a reduction in price that can reach 90% when it is listed on the market. this is clearly a scam scheme. avoid investing in IEOs and protect your money

The fact is that each cryptocurrency exchange has its own conditions for placing a coin of a new project. For example, the Binance exchange has a price tag, how much developers have to pay for this procedure. Of course, IEO has become safer for investors, but in the case of ICO companies, the current situation in the cryptocurrency market is completely different. And nevertheless, you need to be careful with IEO, because even a fraudster looks at the ratio of capital that he can spend and how much he can earn at the same time.

You are correct, in large exchange IEO has a bigger chance to success, investors are smarter, they know how the market works so they try to invest on an exchange with good reputation, usually those IEO in big exchange like Binance are successful, while the rest of the exchange, they have a low success rate.

However, the popularity of IEO has been lessened since DeFi market has been growing massively.

So this is what happened, ICO dead, IEO dead soon as DeFi take over.

One of the reasons ICOs are no longer in demand, is because they are indeed more profitable to invest in IEOs. Because as we know, IEO is safer,
because it is certain that it can be directly traded. In contrast to ICOs which are not necessarily listed on exchanges, let alone IEOs held by large
exchanges like Binance. There is very little scam occurrence, in contrast to ICO which is indeed a very high percentage of scams. So to my knowledge,
in 2021 the ICO is dead. For this year people prefer IEO or DeFi for investment.

Individuals are keen and shrewd at this point. They are presently thinking cautiously before to invest so the opportunity of being lose is currently diminished. I invest on some IEO and now its fruitful, Now I am standing by to list the token on the exchange. My psyche is as yet stressing if this tokens and coin would get listed or not