Bitcoin Forum

While it has been established in this thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5228825) that he's the owner of Little Mouse (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2344286) and RaptarX (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2530429) accounts, this user is still participating in the 2 campaigns.
Both campaigns explicitly prohibit to be enrolled with an alt account yet.

---

---

🐁🐁Little Mouse/RaptarX defames me in a self-moderated thread & deletes my replies🐁🐁

He's quoting my name at the first line of his current accusation thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5247232.0
But when I came there few hours ago to deny his infamous accusations against me, he deleted my post.

https://i.ibb.co/Wtbhc5X/LM-thread.png
http://archive.is/MYHsp

I think it's a very untrustworthy and dishonest conduct, he should be tagged by other members for all the shenanigans he has done yet.

Enough is enough!  >:(

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2344286

---

When you made accusations against him, they were deleted.  You're not innocent here.

You can't stop people from writing false things about you.   All you can do is react to it properly. 

So you're against fairness and justice? Where do you live? in North Korea??
If he accuses me directly and namely he must bear my defense on his thread if he's honest  >:(
People can now use a link of his thread to accuse me of this nonsense allegations.  >:(

Well, I didn't see your comment there, everything about me was made clear. I'm fine now. So, on your suggestion, unlocking the topic to add more convincing evidence, are you sure it's really necessary? Existing evidence (provided by marlboroza + OP) is sufficient to prove their connection. Anyway, I'll unlock that topic as you want, let me see if you have something beautiful. Don't make it stand out if you can't come up with something really good  ;)

Thank you ChuckBuck but it's not necessary anymore since I've opened my own thread (not self-moderated, everyone is welcome)

So what is the evidence that you think is more reliable to prove the connection between them? Is the picture above? To be honest, that photo can't say anything, the previous evidence is compelling enough. You can open this topic to talk about why he deleted your post, but I don't think it would be appropriate to talk about evidence  ::)

This is an evidence of his dishonesty and that he's able to do all shenanigans to try to fool people including abusing the trust system.
He has no limits, no ethics. So he's very untrustworthy and people should avoid to trade with him.

@ Little Mouse, was marked some time ago against allegations made by @CuckBuck.
marked by @Lauda.
Other members cannot mark @Little Mouse, with what you mentioned in your topic, there is no fundamental argument for us, it is only a dispute between you two.
OP, if you want @Little Mouse to erase negative feedback on you, talk well and give him an understanding that you are innocent and fine.

That's what you can do, try to convince him of all these accusations.

In fact he just want to discredit me and Chuckbuck because he doesn't want people to know he's the alt account of RApTarx (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2530429)
He opened his accusation self-moderated thread only few hours after we've talk about that on one of his thread.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5247010.msg54440981#msg54440981

And I'm still thinking he chose his lowest rank account(Little Mouse, Full Member) to manage this campaign in order to farm it to the Senior rank thanks to the merits received...
And to be able to have at least 2 Senior rank accounts enrolled at the same time in signature campaigns.

I know it...! And I already said, talk to @Little Mouse.
valid reasons and proof you are connected with @CuckBuck.
'possibility;
This if interpreted broadly, can be right and wrong, inaccurate.
can't be named a suspect yet.

---

In this case, I can draw a conclusion for your accusation that "not enough evidence" is still "possible".
OP, can still communicate and ask this question to @Little Mouse, from where you can be associated with this accusation.

For me 'no' will accuse other Alt members of just talking, I am more to the evidence presented, it is for me.
People have their own ways to do it all, you better ask @Little Mouse, from where these accusations arise, talk, or there are other addresses that are connected, in general.

You are really right about it, a conflict between two people should be solved by them, the people outside can't interfere in their argument. @Little Mouse left me two negative feedbacks, I gave the explanation and asked him to correct it, but he still did not delete a false feedback. This is up to his decision, I can't interfere, until now, he keeps quiet and does it.
To be honest, I see him trying to retaliate against me, I'm fine  :P

---

But @Golgoth, why do you have to shout out here when you don't get any negative feedback? I emphasized there that we had no connection, and they accepted it, so why don't we end these problems right here? My suggestion is locking this topic if you can

Just because I've received that in my PM box.

He still hasn't deleted his lies against me, it clearly shows he just wants to discredit me because I've told that he is the alt account of RaptarX.
Moreover he hasn't even notice me when he opened his accusation thread.
If he deletes his lies against me or at least lets my reply in his thread I will close this one.

Which is the wrong reaction.  You are mad simply because he deleted what you wrote - you both are against fairness and justice. 

Whatever you said in my thread was off topic in my opinion and that's why I had deleted your post. I did not created self moderated thread to censor anything. I created it self moderated to remove the spam and off topic posts you do like you did in Project Covid-19 Signature campaign.

Great to see you here Little Mouse
Now could you explain us why you didn't bother to reply to the 3 PMs of RaptarX and to his red trust?
And why you have applied to a campaign with his own information while speaking like him by saying you want to apply to a Senior rank spot and you've previously participated to this campaign?




https://i.imgur.com/0vJUGtL.png
http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5325/53254768.html

https://i.ibb.co/hHSFhjx/raptarx-FB-png.png

Sorry if I continue this topic and bother you. I just find it funny with this
https://i.imgur.com/gEdeGK5.png
Anyone can see clearly that both are connected to each other through what was mentioned earlier. Why do you have to do it? Why should you try to deny it without acknowledging? No hassle for you from it, why hide it  ::)

This post is even more hilarious.

He's literally talking to himself...

http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5325/53255473.html

and then he opens threads to accuse people of doing the same thing... ::)

Yeah, he probably should have allowed you to state your case, but he didn't and there isn't anything left for you to do in that thread. 

Instead of starting a thread like this one, calling for Little Mouse to get tagged, it might have been a better idea to start a thread in Reputation referencing LM's thread and laying down your own argument as to why his accusations aren't true.  This shit happens all the time on bitcointalk.  IMO, I don't think anything Little Mouse did in that thread makes him worthy of a neg. 

The post OP quoted that was deleted didn't look that off-topic to me, and given the fact that you outright accused him of being an alt of someone, I probably would have let it be.  Just my 2 cents.

Ok I will change the title then.

I think you were wrong to change the title like this. I think LoyceV made a proposal to change the title, but it was about talking about his false allegations in his topic, or at least the connection between accounts, no cheating ::) I think the title you have modified is not really appropriate  :D Do you think you should change again  :P

And you, you were wrong to close your thread like that... he continued to cheat as if you haven't done anything. And he finally freely attacked you and me with lies.  >:(

Moreover why now are you talking about a new thread to prove I am not you and you are not me while you've said above it has already been done?  ???

And the point here is not his ludicrous accusations, it's the way he made them and his probity, so don't try to hijack the topic please.

What do you think I should do? I have proven the relationship between accounts, most DTs appear there and witness it, but there are no sanctions. What else do you think I should do?
I understand your feelings, you are unjust, so you have the right to speak up. I have also clarified these issues earlier, he ignored it. He slandered because he wanted to take revenge on me. You are unlucky when he is targeted. Our personal resentment has affected you, he accuses you even without evidence. Sorry about that  :D

I decided to post here in the hope Little Mouse just might decide to post in a thread related to him:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5228825
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5362549.0 (now locked)

It still is not clear why Little Mouse continues to post in other threads in the forum especially those related to alt-accounts or cheating in campaigns pointing out cheats yet he is not posting anything to defend himself from the allegations put forward. He even found time to start managing a campaign but did not find the time to post about the allegations made against him.

I have just sent Little Mouse a PM asking him to look at this post and asked for a reply.

What are you going to say about the allegations in this and the other two linked threads, Little Mouse?

What is the allegation in this thread?

Why don't you just share what you sent my by PM (September 26, 2021, 12:34:01 PM Amsterdam time)? Or, if it's easier for you, give me permission to quote your PM here.
It does explain RapTarX'es post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5199919.msg53255473#msg53255473) and the negative feedback he left you:

Watching Little Mouse avoiding answering the question, it is getting somewhat tedious. Since he has no interest in posting openly in the threads related to him.

He has sent me another PM just minutes ago asking how I can be comfortable sharing private message in public but I never copied and pasted the message, I mentioned a small part of what he wrote because he did not contest the allegation that Little Mouse and RapTarX are accounts operated by the same puppeteer. Nor is he posting anything in public.

He seems to be diverting away from the real issue by trying to deflect on to other things in private messages while posting openly about anything in the forum except his own explanation.


Could the RapTarX account have left the negative trust as theatrics as a way to try to save at least one account while knowing the other could be saved by playing ignorant? Rather than admit the slip-up and lose two accounts would it not be better for a puppeteer to try to save at least one while still hoping that two can be saved? That is another possibility.

That's possible. But it's also possible RapTarX doesn't have anything to do with it.
Let me put it this way: if someone says they're me, I can't help it, but that doesn't mean anyone should believe them.

LoyceV, I said you I will post it in public. It took me days to finally decide.
I will post that today along with an explanation to other thread. I'm little busy at the moment with some personal work in real life. I will try to post tonight but if I can't, I will post by this Friday.

I agree, if someone claims to be say for example LoyceV and posts as such, that should not mean the onus is on LoyceV to prove that he is not connected to one who posted under the guise by deliberate sabotage or accidental slip-up. At the same time the reaction of LoyceV would count for something too.

In this case, RapTarX did not exactly react in a way that gives me confidence either but then again I do not know him, never interacted with him other than a couple of PMs and posts a couple of days ago therefore do not know his personality. Hopefully RapTarX can post too just to say with retrospect if it was it a good idea for him to say:

"Lol, who would've thought someone else is applying with my information. Funnily enough; made my day.
Can I know what's going on @Little Mouse"

It would not have made my day and I would not have found it funny either. On the contrary, I would be furious that someone has deliberately or accidentally posted claiming to be me and that now I could be stuck with a red tag accused of being an alt-account or part of a farming account. That still does not negate from the fact that RapTarX cannot be accused of wrongdoing, the onus is on Little Mouse to explain why he did what he did.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5199919.msg53255473#msg53255473
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5199919.msg53254782#msg53254782


You sent me a PM just a couple of hours ago saying you did not feel comfortable to explain either in private or in public and you would not do it. What changed?

If you it took you days to decide that you will post and explain everything but you told me just a couple of hours ago you would not post and not explain and not share what you shared with Loyce - then there must be titanic struggle going on inside you.

You sent a PM just a couple of hours ago saying that everything was crystal clear and you had nothing to explain but now you post to say you will provide an explanation - so what has changed and why the need to explain now even though said everything is crystal clear? Certainly looking forward to reading your explanation by Friday at the latest.

Thank you for letting us know you will provide an explanation.

It seems, someone is desperate to hide something. While looking at the history of these accounts, I stumbled upon a comment, that I believe, should be brought to notice for many.


I have no proof that there is any real connection among these accounts and hence leave it for investigation to the community.

There's not really a point in investigating an accusation without proof. But if it really happens someone gets his account on DT1 by using sockpuppets, all it takes is one topic in Meta (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5128907.0) to blacklist them from DT1-voting (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5128907.msg50491004#msg50491004).