Bitcoin Forum

LAST UPDATED 5th DECEMBER 2022




Here is the 1xbit signature campaign threads:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5339884.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5384913.0

Here is their thread where they claim to be solving issues:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5266815.0

Here is their censored and self-moderated review thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5339885.0

The forum is full of posts from victims and alleged victims of the 1xbit scammers where winnings have not been paid and/or withdrawals have been blocked and accounts locked... therefore in an attempt to counter the valid negativity they have started a signature campaign to try to create a division between forum members.

The 1xbit scammers have also started a thread where they will pay users for effectively writing good things about them.

---

In simple terms, all signature campaign participants for the 1xbit scammers are kindly requested to withdraw from the campaign because they are in most cases knowingly supporting and promoting a well known scam organisation.

All members posting selective and dubious reviews or out and out lies in their 1xbit.com honest review campaign thread in order to pocket some BTC are advised to refrain from doing so. Please do not support either directly or indirectly any scam organisation.


All new 1xbit signature campaign participants or applicants will receive a PM asking them to refrain from displaying the 1xbit signature or their account will be most probably receive negative feedback after 48 hours of them promoting the 1xbit scammers.

I am not the only forum member who has left negative trust for those promoting the 1xbit scammers. Once negative trust is given, it will not be removed unless there is a compelling case.

Please stop promoting a known scam and do not not apply to join their promotions for the sake of pocketing some Bitcoin that was effectively stolen by the 1xbit scammers from innocent victims and then passed on to their signature participants and their honest reviews campaign. Thank you.






From my investigations, studies and experience about the 1xbit campaign applicants and participants, it seems many of them can be broken down in to a few groups what are operated by a single puppeteer who controls the sock-puppets of that particular group. It seems 1xbit are inadvertently paying most of their campaign funds in to the hands of a few puppeteers that have fooled them. A fully deserved yet strange situation that the 1xbit scammers themselves have been scammed by their campaign participating puppeteers.

After the campaign applicants and participants that are part of farming groups, the next largest group seem to be alt-accounts. After that, the remaining seem to be applying in order to try their luck but they are in the tiniest of minority.

At the moment ~136 names have been added
Here is a list of those who have either applied to join or participated in their signature campaign which effectively means these forum members knowingly want to promote a scam (which will make the number of victims increase) just because they will receive payment from the 1xbit scammers. The list will be updated as and when time permits. You all are requested to add the following to your trust list with a tilde therefore effectively excluding and distrusting them:

I would say let's give the participants a week time. Let them decide if they want to remove the sig code. If they don't then how about tagging them since we have a warning post now that clearly shows that they can not have an excuse for it anymore.

Maybe on can mention all the participants in this thread or send PM (it could be riskly considering they will report it as unsolicited PM).

According to this spreadsheet All the participants has atleast one negative trust what I can see by default trust view. And as I guess There is a big chance that many of them are enrolling the campaign with their alts.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jd9RqLTK10kQJ20CjT0xQfLbYFyQxPW0VYUJ2CFtg4Y/edit#gid=279361360


And the funny things is The 1xbit manager looking for some user/members who has not any red trust.  ;D

A request to ignore all users wearing their signature is also an alternative if they don't take this post seriously.

On yobit campaign, some participants were tagged by suchmoon and if I'm correct, all of these were neutral. I think that's the best approach here too. Both yobit and 1xbit are same. They are selectively scamming people and/or scamming through so called blockchain less project.

The only reason the admins, have to take action against the 1xbit site and maintainers, looks like they / 1xbit campaign participants don't care if they are flagged by DT, this is because 1xbit maintainers accept participants who have earned red trust from the start.

In the case of 1xbit only the admin can take action at this time, it's a shame for newcomers who are not aware of the 1xbit scam site, the victims of fraud are increasing every day, because they offer a fairly high bonus, many are tempted and fall victim to 1xbit, they don't realize after the money is deposited and play wins, 1xbit team, closes the account.

Every effort has been made by DT and other members of this forum, to warn against new members, but that doesn't seem to stop them from advertising, I beg the admin, take one action against the 1xbit site, so that victims of fraud do not increase every day.

---

I know scams are not moderated here and the forum doesn't want to be involved in that, but this is a step that must be taken by the Bitcointalk forum to still give the best impression for the Bitcoin/crypto community in the future, not the impression of being scammed by certain sites.

I don't know why some of the people who joined their campaign are defending it as if that's going to help them get paid more. There's one that I saw earlier that says that they did pay so the claim that they're a scam isn't going to be true. This participants would probably sell their mothers for a dollar for how desperate they are.

Do you believe 1xbit signature campaign participants will leave the campaign? I don't think so, because all participants are tagged from the beginning of the start campaign and they were aware of the 1xbit scam. So all the participants of 1xbit do not care about the forum trust system. They don't have fear of getting the red tag. So how they will leave campaigns? Rather than they are creating a reputation thread upon getting a red tag from DT members. I can't see any way how we can prevent them from promoting the 1xbit signature.

It doesn't going happen you know unless they spam like Yobit.

Such a shame we live in a society where people especially the youths are ready to trade their reputation for a penny that won't last or contribute anything to their lives, the same youths who help in promoting a scam site would become victims one way or another and start blaming the government for not providing adequate cybersecurity. How do you sleep knowing that what you are being paid is from a scammed victim.

It is now important to take action against those who are participating in 1xbit's signature campaign. They are wearing the signature of 1xbit, and if somewhere a user says something against 1xbit then they are arguing with those members which means they are willing to do anything to promote this scam in big way.

It's really a shame that they are promoting a scam to earn a little money by participating in the signature campaign. Which is giving that website a chance to scam on a larger scale. They don't just limit themselves to participating in signature, they try their best to defend that website. Most of the members who have participated in this signature campaign have had their accounts tagged by DT members due to their involvement in various scam campaigns. So their illegal activities already exist.

Ahh!!! This alone make 1xbit to deserve negative trust, that means anyone that created his own opinion content (post) which is against theirs (1xbit) will be deleted by 1xbit. I have noticed this site even before I joined Bitcointalk, no good reputation about them at the time even till now. I will advice people to stay away from this gambling site (1xbit) because of the bad reputation it has on this forum, until it is changed to good reputation by experienced member of this forum.

the thread was supposed to be an "honest review" although I am not sure how honest they are. I've seen negative reviews in the thread too and those were paid also(at least according to what the OP of that thread has posted). although I agree with what NotATether said in that thread. (quoted it below for reference)



seeing that the accounts bought by adkinsbet have simultaneously become active and applied to the campaign there's no doubt that others are applying their alts too.

I think giving them a week is being too generous. Maybe 48 hours in enough even though from another aspect they probably do not even deserve to be given time but still I requested in a kind and courteous manner from them to stop colluding with the 1xbit scammers.

When the Yobit scammers were running a signature campaign here I created a thread asking all signature campaign participants displaying Yobit banners to kindly stop promoting their scam otherwise they would be tagged within 48hrs (I believe), I even listed their user names and sent PMs to those before tagging but I had time and patience in that period. Right now it will not be possible to send PMs and go through every account to copy and paste their details but they will end up getting tagged.

Last month I was not on DT1, maybe this will change this month so my tagging might have more of an impact on those signature participants that are willing to entice gullible people in to losing their money at the hands of the 1xbit scammers.


I am not surprised by this because 1xbit are scammers after all and they have no hesitation in wanting to scam people but all the while are seeking to employ only those with clean trust history to promote their scam. The only reason they have negative trust participants in their signature campaign is because those that are not using alt-accounts and those that are trying to protect their hard earned trust and reputation would never even think about participating.


Yes this is an option which can be applied even after tagging them.


Here is how I took action against the Yobit scammers and I received a lot of support from the forum, thankfully they made a decision to leave the forum but maybe that was not associated with the thread but it certainly got a lot of attention: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5220208.0

A request to whom?  Anybody reading this thread can ignore all the signatures they want, but the problem is obviously that most members don't have signatures on ignore and will therefore be exposed to the posts made by all the members of the 1xbit.com campaign--and some of them might click on one of those signatures and potentially get scammed.

Personally, I don't care if JollyGood or anyone else tags every single participant, though I wouldn't feel the need to do so myself.  There was a similar situation with the last Yobit campaign, and I'm of mixed feelings about punishing the campaigners rather than going after Yobit or 1xbit.com or whoever else is accused of scamming.  The reason for that (which many of you probably won't agree with) is that just because you rent out your signature space, it doesn't mean you endorse the service that's being advertised. 

It's tantamount to boycotting a TV station for allowing [pick your controversial company] to buy an advert slot when that company has done something shady.  It happens all the time and to me I'm fine with it.  Everyone should do their own due diligence before buying a product or using a service that's advertised on a website/TV station/wherever.

That's true but what is the forum said to be again to the industry at large, it's supposed to be a hangout platform for fellow enthusiast but now it's more like a building ground for newbie to start their journey in the industry. Already there's enough scams out there that they have to protect themselves from, it doesn't make sense for them to start seeing the community give room for scammers to have their way by advertising freely on the forum.

Already Theymos did denied them an advert slots on the forum, that alone should send a very strong signal that scammers aren't welcomed here even though the forum doesn't moderate scams. The community always look out for her members and this isn't the first time they'll be tackling similar issue. I remember yobit controversial and how the community won, same with Best_change and how we may them clear up their accusations, that's how a company having the best interest of her reputation should react.

I believe if this steps on stopping them from advertising and clearing up their reputation isn't taken, we might just be sending the wrong signal to other scammy company out their to come pollute the forum. Let call black Black when we see them and not be the others, the media house careless about the welfare of their customers instead focused on enriching themselves, we can do better than them. I believe 1xbit will be welcomed if they work towards resolving the issue raised against them but until then, I stand with the OP and I'll be willing to participate in the tagging.

I have reviewed all the accepted participants and noticed all the participant have at least2 negative trust from default trusted users. Anyway, the users who had joined on this campaign knew they will get negative trust and even they may get banned for promoting 1xbit like promoting yobit.

Most of the participants had a negative trust before now from Godknows where and when they saw that the manager was accepting scammer promoters they jumped in it knowing that they have nothing to lose besides scam is not moderated on the forum, there are few accounts still promoting Adkinsbet without getting any restrictions or ban. Maybe restrict negative trust accounts from participating in bounties and sig campaigns.

Those who do not have prior negative feedbacks before joining this campaign is making a huge gamble because of the high payout and they are hoping that the campaign will last a long time, probably 4 to 5 months unless the forum restricts the campaign, I don't think they will heed the advice here.

This is a good question. Where did all the previously colored accounts know about the beginning of this subscription campaign? There are only a few people who sincerely resented the received tag, the rest do not care. It has already been proven that awakened accounts are someone else's alternatives.
Would you believe that they read the forum without logging in? It is more logical to think that they belong to someone who is among us but pretends to be honest, and all of his altos are signed to this scam.
Therefore, whether you remove negative tags or not, does not matter for these profiles. These are scam accounts that will promote anything for money without worrying about their reputation.

Sadly we are all too familiar with the fact that scams are not moderated by the admins here in the forum, it is really about us all taking individual or collective action against those that are trying to scam forum members and destroying the reputation of crypto on an international scale.


Those that are defending 1xbit by posting propaganda in their "honest reviews" thread and also in their signature campaign thread, they do it simply because they are either the Adkinsbet associated bunch of alt-accounts and are on the 1xbit payroll or they hope to be on the 1xbit payroll by trying to endear themselves.

These sorts of signature campaign participants are of they type that would gladly sell the soul of their grandmother to the devil for the sake of a few pennies therefore they would feel zero remorse for promoting a known scam such as 1xbit.


Yes it is a shame but sadly when it comes to some forum members, they would easily trade their reputation and dignity for a penny or two. They do not care about promoting scams because they simply do not care.


Thankfully several members have already tagged many of those promoting the 1xbit scammers. I also started tagging all accounts either displaying their signature or those that have applied to join (including those that are probably alt-accounts but have been vocal supporters).


Their self-moderated/censored thread was designed to stifle any opposition to the narrative they wanted to spew but in the end they will never be able to stop voices of opposition. If 1xbit were serious about being a genuine business they would make it clear who owns and operates them in their ToS and also list and explain their real association with the Kawbet scammers but before all of that they would apologise to all their victims and pay them owed funds as well as compensation.

Put quite simply, the 1xbit scammers cannot be trusted.


It would be interesting to know what binds those sets of Adkinsbet shills and their real relationship to the Kawbet/1xbit scammers.

I beg for my negative trust to be removed  :( I was too busy to look at the past replies about the 1xbit campaign. I thought it's legit since it hasn't removed for a weeks til now that I saw my negative trust rating :(

I never intended to join any fraudulent activities. In fact, I've sold some artworks of mine to reputable persons here in the forum. I hope the removal of negative trust rating on my account would be reconsidered.

Something similar happened to me. I just filled out the joining form and after I found out what scammers they are; I even asked them to remove my name from the list of those accepted.
I did not cooperate for a second with such great swindlers.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5339884.msg57100520#msg57100520 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5339884.msg57100520#msg57100520)

You did a good job by stopping to promote them. If  you think it before joining then this would be more better for you.

So here some people started to come because of tagging them by the OP. But It seems only who have neutral trust before joining the 1xbit campaign are doing care of their reputation now. But who have already some neg feedback they are not care about their reputation and even they have not any problem to promote scam. They can do anything for money.

I have tagged some of them not only for wearing the scammer's signature but also for openly defending and making them appear that 1XBIT is a victim of fake accusations, with so many accusations it's hard to defend it, they should not defend it, if they want to wear their signature at the expense of getting a tagged then they should go on but do not defend them by posting that they are victims, it's adding insult to injury for the victims.

Good decision on leaving on there signature campaign but I believe that you see the trust rating of 1xbit before you join though. You can simply check it by visiting there ANN thread and the trust score of 1xbit main account. So being busy is not an excuse when joining a campaign next time. Your negative trust will be remove/turn to neutral by Jolly once he became online again as long as you didn't promote them blatantly just like what other users did.

I just have one question, why are you wearing Blenderwallet's signature right now? I don't know who you're trying to fool, but you're not a part of their sig. campaign.

I agree with you; I'm also just leery of setting a precedent of doing something like this, negging all the members of a campaign, because who knows if the next project someone thinks is a scam will actually be one?  In this case, I'd say the evidence is solid that 1xbit.com is indeed a scam, but I still have reservations.  I'd much, much prefer that Theymos act like a leader and ban the campaign outright rather than just deny them advertising space.  It would seem like he doesn't want blood on his hands (or at least perhaps the legal liability if there is one) but is content with allowing other people to advertise a scam project/exchange--just like he's content with allowing scammers to operate freely on this forum.

As I said, I have no problems with anyone who tags the campaign participants; I just don't like the potential ramifications that might stem from that.  There was a project once that cryptodevil swore was a scam, and he'd warned all the campaign participants that he was going to tag them all--and he is/was on DT.  It later turned out that the project wasn't scamming anyone, that it had been a misunderstanding (and it was so long ago that I don't remember the name of the project, but I think it was one of the ICOs).  My point is that he was on DT and had influence over a number of other members, and had they bullied people into ditching a campaign that they thought was a scam, everyone would have lost.

I'm glad this thread was started, because at least it allows the 1xbit.com campaign participants a chance to see it and respond (or get out of the campaign before their reputations are reddened).  That's the right way to go about it if any tagging is to be done.

There is nothing honest about those reviews. Most of them were made by Adkinsbet shills, and they appear to be run by only one person (as has already been mentioned here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5339884.msg57356981#msg57356981)).

JollyGood do you think that damaging the trust of others is a funny thing to do?
I removed the signature as soon as i heard of 1xbit's issues, i had no issues with their websites and i thought that they are well known and well reputed then that's why i applied. after a while i encountred the issues and immediately removed their signature and informed all the other members about that. Now you're coming days later to destroy my trust. Thanks so much but you did a wrong move here, if you're happy then you can leave the feedback but fyi i didn't enroll with them neither got added into their participants list.

To everyone not part of their campaign I guess. I noticed that the accepted participants have prior tags and I doubt they will leave. I'm pretty sure 1xbit wouldn't remove them because they were tagged from joining their campaign. So I thought why not just ignore all their promoters and starve 1xbit of our attention?

Personally, my ignore list probably doubled when I visited their signature thread yesterday.

hello Jollygood, I beg you once again to review my status. since I can't be a participant in the xBit campaign event, I have deleted my registration in their campaign. with that I hope you reconsider the negative trust you have placed in me.

I can send you a message. so with all due respect please respond.

Y'all playing the dummy games right now after it was clearly written that no one should participate or promote the scam site but y'all all were blinded by the huge payout, you sold your reputation for a few penny.

Honestly, I don't see so much spam coming from people with 1xbit signatures and even if I don't agree with how 1xbit runs things in general, you can't and should not stop them for having paid campaigns in forum.
This is free market and free speech, everyone here knows they are risky and members participating are also taking risks, but I won't tag anyone for joining this campaign,
and better solution would be just to ignore them and don't give them so much attention.
We really really don't need more 1xbit topics in forum.

That's not a dummy game, i'm having the same case just like him. We didn't promote the 1xbit, we applied for the campaign and we withdrew our applications, we weren't even listed amount their participants list. Jollygood just went to that campaign and tagged everyone that applied. In my case i withdrew my application and removed the signature as soon as i got the details that 1xbit is having a trust issue and just to mention, i've made some bets in their platform and everything went smooth, how could i guess they have a trust issue, everything were looking fine!
Please refrain from saying "dummy games" and stuffs like that, we're honest, we're not trying to destroy Bitcointalk but this forum is being centralized and big bounty managers are making it impossible for us to join the safest and most trusted campaigns. This thing is about decentralization and now it's fucking being centralized. Now, random guys are tagging us, where the hell is satoshi?

Well now that's a great question and while I don't know the answer - nor do I know how he/she/they/it would feel about the whole trust system to begin with - I do know that trust ratings can be removed, so just have a little bit of patience and I think the situation will resolve itself.

I'm personally not one to tag accounts simply for wearing a signature, but I'm not entirely against it either... depends on the context. In this context it seems that the tag has already served a benefit, and probably no longer does.

I'm going to say that crypto means decentralization. These couple Bounty managers centralized it all using the trust system of the forum. They leave us for shitty bounties or for shitty campaigns like 1xbit. I think that they are getting fat from the bounty management payrolls and they are working to destroy our accounts one by one, i remember that a very very famous member tagged me because of Yobit but in the mean time a very very known Bounty manager was advertising and managing a campaign that belong to Yobit/ a Forum campaign belonging to a Yobit owned Forum. For Fuck sake, where's equality? The big fuckers' asses gets bigger promoting scams and victims like us gets tagged for a thing that we didn't enroll totally in. are we getting these tags just for making an application and then removing it?
Note that i weren't wearing the signature when i got tagged, i was wearing another one for a long period. The member that tagged me just scrolled in the signature campaign thread and tagged the applicants randomly without checking.

I somewhat agree with your position. This is not so much about the participants in the campaign as it is about the organizer. It looks like 1xBit is getting what they deserve.
I don't know if they're scam or not because I haven't personally dealt with them (and I don't intend to), but their way of conducting business is disgraceful. As long as they continue to ignore legitimate accusations against them and, at the same time, wish to promote their business on this platform, they deserve condemnation from the community. Therefore, I support tagging all members who ignore all warnings and are willing to promote anything to get a few extra dollars.

Just want you to know Jolly that I have never worn the signature of 1xbit. I just apply to it and learn they have actually negative trust so I never wear their signature and participate to another campaign.

This thread is about 1xbit Signature Campaign Participants to which I'm not. Please remove the reg tag.

It was archived in this post  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5340390.msg57104625#msg57104625) the day that I applied to the campaign but never really wear the signature. the next week I was wearing the signature of Non Fungible Defi (NFD) project which my post is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5342118.msg57168345#msg57168345

archive link http://web.archive.org/web/20210528024714/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5339884.0&all=

@mr_ROBOTT, @target, you both applied for bounty in hopes that 1xBIT would accept you and that you would proudly wear their signature. I don't understand why you're complaining here, instead you should really be complaining to 1xBIT about not being included in the campaign.

archive (https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5723/57235514.html)

But you had an intention. And don't tell us you didn't know about that company's reputation. Trust ratings are clearly visible for anyone to see.

By the way, it's amusing to see you getting your arse kicked all over the place.  :D

And there rests my case too...

For me there is no difference in applying and participating when they wilfully and knowingly were happy to promote a known scam website that would probably result in others being scammed but it was acceptable for them because they would get some money for themselves.

What a despicable mindset for any human being to have towards another.

There is really no difference, people should do diligent research when it comes to applying not because of the payout that they are going to get it's so obvious the manager is tagged heavily and there's a flag created and supported by many members here if you apply you have the risk of getting tagged.

Quite incredible how after all these months of being warned for your plagiarism and cheating, you still succeed in making enemies all over these boards...

You're big mouthing now and you'll be crying and apologizing like a baby in a few hours, like you've been doing since the very first day you and your alts were active on these boards.

Posting the content of PMs is once more another thing which is seriously frowned upon on these boards.

If you'd spend even a fraction of your time participating in this community instead of purely hunting for crypto, you'd have known that by now.

Big man if this is not a dummy game then should I call it a smart game? You applied on the 4 page of the thread after so much warning and proven scam accusation against 1xbet on the 1st -3rd page of the thread, I'm sure you read those warning before applying, Now you got rejected, came here calling on Satoshi to come down because you were red-tagged for attempting to spread scam page on our forum.

Well reg trust does not stop you from posting on the forum but your words must be cross-check, "if ya tell us good morning we have to check our time to make sure it's morning" if wear a sig we have to do research on the site, if you apply for a loan you earn more reg tag. This is how reg tag slavery works, you brought it upon yourself.

A good name is better than silver and gold

It seems that life teaches nothing. Is this karma? You escaped the ban on the forum, burst into tears, showing some diligence, and now again complaints here and there. You deserve a red mark because you are incurable.

I would like to say that i applied when i only have read the signature campaign requirements. Then i withdrew my application after having read the whole comments about it. This guy Jolly came after a long, a very long period of time to tag us. This means if i withdrew my application post he won't have tagged me because he was scrolling in their thread tagging people without checking whether they joined that campaign or not.
The main goal of Jolly is to use his power to break our trust, i'm not the only one that withdrew the application. He ignored us all without clarifications. He has already a clear goal which is to damage our trust, he doesn't fucking care about safety of members neither about maintaining a clean discussion. He had a goal, and he scrolled amoung all the participants just to tag them, it's a funny act for him, i would love to insult him now because beggars like him should get their asses kicked out of DT.

I'm still trying to be a useful member.
dear lovesmayfamilis The time for crying and newcomer is over. I have put my whole life on this forum to prove myself.

Do not even try with these humans, no body will care. Jolly had a goal and he achieved it. It's funny for him to scroll and tag accounts, that's it.

I know Jolly and as far as I know, he is a good person. Let's admit our mistake and seek to make up for it.

I love that fact that you always try to play smart and end up crucifying yourself with your comment, you said you withdrew your application? As of today 4th July 2021 ( I won't waste my time quoting) your application is still hanging up there waiting for the sig manager to accept you to the campaign  ;D

Yes JollyGood has a goal which is to clean our forum from toxic people like you, if I was on DT I'd have done the same thing. You can teleport your account to Altcointalk and be a good member there, you've leant your season I guess.


Lol, this got me  ;D ;D

Dude, the vibe I'm getting from the community here is that your "sorry" means nothing, and that the negative trust you've received isn't going to go away--ever. 

No you haven't.  You've been a member since late 2020 (assuming this is your only account, which it probably isn't), so you haven't even had enough time to prove anything to anyone here, except that you're willing to participate in any campaign without ascertaining whether the project/exchange/whatever is a scam or not.  Assuming you aren't evading a ban for plagiarism as friends1980 alluded to, your best bet would be to ditch this account and start over as a newbie with a different one.  I'd also suggest that you listen to what's being said here and not repeat the mistakes you've made, because believe me, if you do the same shit as you've been doing thus far, you'll be sniffed out and negged into oblivion again.

Good luck.

I noticed that what is making people to promote a signature campaign that is not what for promotion is because of their weekly pay out money, the money they pay them just makes the participants not to care of negative trust, but it's really bad for users of the community who are making use of their sight and brain correctly promoting such organization which they knew that it made of scam, going through the history of 1×bit, it's obvious that they are scammers, and much attention should be giving to the users most especially those that is submitting current application. That's my personal suggestions.

Dear Pharmacist, Your advice to me is quite respectable.
But if I did not care about my negative trust, I would have collaborated with the 1xbet site and, like the rest, would have pocketed my money and created a new account.
I have corrected my past mistakes and I will correct this mistake and I am sure one day I will gain Jolly's trust.

With respect

first, I think participation in 1xbit signature campaign does not deserve a mandatory red mark. Neutral can be enough, especially if you removed their signature when you realized the problem with this casino.

But, in your case, I saw three different accusations. So, you made more mistakes here and obviously, you need to change many things with yourself, not only to remove code from your signature. Even if you create a new account, it will be recognized and marked very soon, if you do not change anything in your approach.
Your current feedbacks is just a warning for you, and you certainly have to reconsider your understanding of moral norms.

Yes, that's the thinking of successful people in the future, sportsmanship.

As far as I understand, DT members do this, not because they hate other members, who participate in the 1xbit campaign, in fact they have warned in advance in this situation, do not register involved in advertising the site 1xbit, but all of that was ignored, In fact, many members ignore this situation, they know 1xbit is involved in various money thefts against users on the 1xbit site, but they don't care, they continue to apply for the lure of high pay.

That's it: @JollyGood took an alternative like this, it's new, 1-3 DT members did and tagged 1xbit participants after being warned, just imagine if 20-50 DT members wrote on each member's profile different words about1xbit scam, who ignored the warnings from DT and continued to advertise the 1xbit site, of course you can't imagine looking so bad.

But for you @mr_ROBOTT just follow @The Pharmacist's advice, maybe this is the best right now, hopefully in the future it will be even better and you can be relied on by @JollyGood.

I would rather be a jerk than to sell my soul and reputation promoting a scam project for $90.  "Money is good but the love of money is evil"  A great quote from my ancestors the gods of 7th waterfalls. I hope you learn from this quote.

I'm pretty sure they had this all planned out before they launched the campaign, probably they thought having one of the highest payrate will make them get support from the community as reputed members will want to participate in their campaign but their plans failed.

Instead they're getting patronage from users which don't care about the success of their campaign, they're just after the dollars they're offering and are willing to do anything to get more which is why we're seeing alts applying in their numbers.

I doubt there would be any sort of quality in the participants of the campaign as they all will be spamming just to get as much dollars they can before the campaign ends. Sadly there's nothing we can do but just to warned feedbacks. Already 1xbit knows they'll be getting more as most likely new victims will be gotten from their current promotion.

It is not surprising that those posting here claiming they did not participate (or they were refused or they applied but withdrew their 1xbit applications) are now trying to get their tags removed. Many of them even have previous tags for either promoting the P2PB2B and/or Yobit scams.


It is clear the scam promoter is trying to provoke you by posting nonsense. You did not fall to his low level and it is clear have you have won the debate. These scammers would happily collect $30-$140 a week for displaying the 1xbit signature therefore in my honest opinion a tag is definitely appropriate.

As a collective, as a unit that frequents this wonderful forum we need to get together to marginalise any and all attempts that try to steal from innocent and gullible people.


I agree.

With the reputation 1xbit had within the forum they probably thought offering to pay above average amounts for their signature campaign would bring them highly respected members but they failed. All managed to achieve was to attract the lowest of the low and bottom of the barrel alt-account operators and shills that would not hesitate to shake hands with equally low organisations.

So many of the same accounts that were promoting the Adkinsbet scammers are now promoting this 1xbit scam, that is no coincidence. All of those Adkinsbet shill accounts are controlled by one person which makes me think there is much more going on here, when I have time I will try to investigate thoroughly.

There account had also no value unless this campaign started. Because they have either multiple accounts and/or they had negative trust or they have no time to post on the forum. But for this campaign they got chance to make few money by this campaign.

It's obvious that immediately the campaign finish it's when they will know the advantage of not to have red trust and disadvantages of red trust, right now they all focusing and working because of the money involve in their payment, i may say some of them are ignorant of what their doing by promoting 1×bit especially those higher rank users who condemn their account because money, after the campaign end it will clear to the participants because no signature campaign will accept with such multiple of red trust.

It seems 1xbit are very happy to work alongside these types of highly dubious (at the very least) characters.

I most certainly do agree with this. Not only does choosing to not take action towards scams tarnish the reputation of  the crypto industry as a whole in the long run, but also makes the forum and the information found here to become less reliable in the eyes of new comers. Although, people can indeed go and check the reputation of the promoter or the thread creator by looking at his/her trust rating to discern whether the information or promotion is truly legitimate or not, it doesn't completely eliminate the risk of scams succeeding since not everyone who visits this forum are well informed about how things work here, specially those that are from underdeveloped countries that fall behind in both information and technology.
While I can understand that this can serve as a good lesson to anyone gullible enough to be scammed and that doing this will absolutely take a lot of work, I still think that taking action gives more benefits than letting these scams be and that whatever actions made towards these type of scams today will be playing a vital role for the future of this forum and this industry as a whole.

There is a sense of irony here because the completely untrustworthy group of sock-puppets, trolls and shills that promoted the Adkinsbet scammers ended up getting hired by the 1xbit scammers to promote their scam. It is like one scam outfit hiring another scam outfit to try and spread the net further in the hope of stealing from more victims.

This was their initial aim, but seeing that only negative trusted sock puppet accounts applied. They accepted all of them, thinking they would defy the odds and it would be a successful campaign.
https://i.imgur.com/dS747wo.png

But from the look of things, I doubt if the campaign being advertised by untrusted accounts is bringing any positive results to them. They have been trying to look for good and neutral trust accounts lately.


They don't get it. No one reasonable wants to associate themselves with scam even for some pay.

You may be right I've not seen Adkinsbet signature promoters for a long time now, seems like they are the same group of people promoting the 1xbet too, there maybe some connection between 1xbet and adkinsbet we never know.

They are definitely on the gaining side of it, having their sig and avatar flag in and out of the forum weeks in and weeks out is very risky considering the amount of newbies signing up daily who has no ideal of the scam accusations against them, most of them found themselves somehow making bets on the site and end up with nothing. If they are able to spend about $4000 weekly on sig campaign then they are scamming x5 of that amount weekly.

Too bad they are desperate for a paying campaign and at this point, they would probably stab their mother for any trickle of money in their wallets. This people don't care if 1xbit is a scammer, long as they pay their part, they will follow 1xbit to the ends of the world if they want to.

This thread deserved a bump because the 1xbit scammers have claimed they paid out over 3 BTC in a lottery but provided no evidence that can conclusively prove their claims. The 1xbit scammers are now saying they will pay 7 BTC in another attempt to scam users.

@JollyGood There is probably nothing to really investigate IMO, it's just 1 person or a small group of people who control a bunch of accounts who are making a bunch of BTC pumping scam casinos. If this was the altcoin / token section they would be getting paid to bump that.
Figure for an hour of work per day per accounts they are generating about $100 a week per account. Or say $700+ a week for a part time job.

@Kittygalore they don't care, to them it's just a job. They might not like the boss or the job, but for that kind of money in a lot of places in the world it's a enough to have a very very nice life. The accounts were already burned because of Adkinsbet so they don't care.

-Dave

I think anyone who chooses to advertise them whether with negative, neutral or positive trust deserves a negative for carrying a scammer's signature. It's valid enough. At least from the accusations I have seen, 1xbit casino are scammers and them trying to hire neutral or positive trust accounts won't save the situation except the participants will damage their reputations. The DT members don't need to look for other reasons to tag accounts.

Hey I just stumbled upon this thread and wish I had done so earlier.
I have tried contacting JollyGood before but got no reply (maybe he put me on his ignore list or doesn't care).
I got red trusted for applying for the 1xbit campaign.
I revoked my application and clearly distance myself from 1xbit and also wrote a review in their review thread, stating that everyone should be careful, depositing money there because of their reputation.
I would like to ask JollyGood here if he could remove the red warning sign on my profile since I am obviously not participating in this campaign and will not do so in the future.

Lol, you became a motivational speaker and a freedom fighter after you left your application on the thread for almost a month wishing to join the campaign, got rejected and here you are trying to play smart, editing all your posts on the thread advising people to ignore 1xbet, you think JollyGood is dumb or what? Looking at your profile you have no single useful post I couldn't spot any single one, your main goal here is to make a few dollars running up on every games and round and giveaway thread. You don't deserve to be on this forum and for the red tag I wish it stays forever.




You were just trying not to be negative and positive at the same time to just get paid by 1xbet.. What a politics

Hey, I am actually mostly active on the german part of the forum.
I am just trying to show you my perspective here. I did not know that 1xbit had that bad of a reputation and since I was able to withdraw money from their site before I didn't really think I would do any harm, applying on their signature campaign.
Now I clearly distance myself from them and therefore the warning on my profile has no use but making me look bad.
If you wanna scroll through my posts on the german forum, you can tell that I am part of the german community and it's not like im on here only to make money. My account has like 10 merits so why would I care too much ? It just annoys me to see negative trust whenever im in this part of the forum.

I also don't really get why you attack me like that, basically calling me a shitposter when I have never even participated in a signature campaign, don't need to spam posts and just recently started participating in some contests to earn an extra buck while just trying to be part of the community.

The negative trust he received must have dented his plans to use his sam00 farmed account for signature spamming purposes.

Hey, what do you mean with "farmed account" ? This is my only account and I am not farming anything. I have never participated in any signature campaigns on this forum. Looks like you are putting me into one basket with alle the 3rd world country signature farming people in this forum. I wish I could have resolved this in a normal manner but it looks like you are not willing to accept my excuse here.
I'll stick to the german part of the forum then and some  giveaways.

edit: I registered in october last year and just recently earned my 10th merit. Does this look like I am farming accounts or whatever to you ?
 

I scroll through your 4 pages profile posts I can't see any posts on the German local board, you are such a beautiful liar or wait are you referring to your alt account?

How you got those 10 merits baffles me you do not have any post worth merit, seems like you got them through giveaway.

You do not need to participate in signature campaign to be a good poster, signature or not you are a natural shit poster

You could check the posts I have created so far.. 6 out of 7 are german I think.
Out of my last 20 posts, 5 are german. Didn't bother to look through more than one page since your point is already proven to be wrong.

I think most of the merits are from german members.

I am saying that there is no reason for me to be a shitposter or spammer since I am not getting paid for posting unlike many others.

I really don't get what your proplem with me is here. If you are not removing the trust then that is your decision but stop hating on me for no reason.

Although I do not support sam00 in trying to subscribe to 1xbet, I can see that sam00 does indeed belong to the German local section. Also, some of his posts, which can hardly be called spam, were judged by merit.
Looks like the subscription 1xbet is doing a great "favor" in bringing "moths to the fire"
And here it is already time to apply the words from the constitution: "Ignorance of the officially published law does not exempt from responsibility for its non-observance."
No matter how funny it looks.  :)

I usually stay out of such things but the negative trust I find very hard.

In my opinion sam00 is not a scammer/spammer.
His posts in the german subboard are helpful, nice and not like you know it from above mentioned groups.

So if you ask me he deserves a second chance. Falling for a bad campaign has happened to many more experienced users.
But of course we know how the trust system works and as so often in life there are different opinions.
I would be happy if a new user here can go his way without being directly negatively afflicted.

I have removed your negative trust and added a neutral instead.

If it was an oversight on your part trying to join a scammer signature campaign then do not worry about it but please do some research in future before you enter in to deals because you could end up endorsing a known scam therefore try to apply due-diligence.

I wish you success in the German and global threads. Take care.

They seem to have changed their mode of application for the signature campaign, but little do they know that signatures of the participants can still be seen.


I have just tagged 3 new participants I saw in the gambling board
1. tulusikhlas (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1002181)
2. izsara (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1168491)
3. maju69 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=856694)

I guess there's no difference to real dirty work I guess, you get paid even if you are frowned by many for what you're doing. Yeah, I have heard that some of them are supporter or sock puppet of Adkinsbet from someone in a different thread I think.

Need Your Attention here please.

I have been tagging any and all accounts that have had promoted or applied to promote the 1xbit scammers.

I continue to request all participants in the 1xbit signature campaign to kindly stop promoting a scam. Thank you.

So you tagged me for this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5339885.msg57089619#msg57089619 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5339885.msg57089619#msg57089619)

It's not fair Jolly! :)

I am also interested in what is the reason for applying the tag to this user, because the link attached to the tag does not contain any archives but leads to this thread. Not that it bothered me, but from time to time I see this guy's ^[iv4n] messages in the various sections of the message and I do not remember that he would have carried the 1xbit signature, (although I do not exclude that I could overlook something).  ;)

---

I found a mention ... As it turned out, the tag is related to the review, but I think the tag is a bit biased, at least I see that you did not red tag other users participating in that discussion. In addition, iv4n did not say anything that significantly differs from the words of other users, he did not say "I recommend" but at the same time publicly expressed concerns and clarified that (I highlighted some thoughts in red).


[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

Tagging Ivan for that is absolutely ridiculous and goes to show how messed this forum and its users have become. Jolly, you better reconsider this if you want to keep your image of being the objective forum gambling police man.

Ivan is actually one of the absolute best and knowledgeable posters when it comes to gambling on bitcointalk, a totally honest and fair guy. Tagging him (for that, lol) is a farce really.

(... I know why I have stopped participating in that forum bs besides updating my own thread every once in a while).

Conclusion. Remove that tag asap - alternatively, you will have fully deserved me taking action.

I have to say I'm with you on this one, Ivan.

For starters, giving a negative in September for something that happened in May... it's a bit off from my personal point of view.

To continue, the thread the comment was made into was a Review thread. Reviews can be both good and bad, and since no review was actually made in the end, the whole information from the tag is off. A little bit above Ivans' post, we can also see examplens making this exact point:


As a side note, I don't think this is a right use of the trust system. I see a distrust on your personal trust list more fitting for this situation, but that may just be my own personal observation.

TLDR; there was no review (negative or positive) so this is just a wild goose chase

For those wishing to give their views about the tag given to iv4n please post in this newly created thread specifically for that issue: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5361695

Dear JollyGood, can you honestly refer me to where I participated in 1xbit signature campaign ?. 1xbit open a thread for both negative and positive reviews of their website which I also review based on my experience (evidence also provided) I never join the signature campaign of 1xbit so why did you give me a red tag ?. I believe DT members are selected to protect the intellectual of this platform but it will not be a good idea if any DT member intentionally does this without any proof.

I urge you to remove the tag

If this is the reason why you tag me, I believe it is your duty to do a rigorous check on my profile before red-tagging me because my password and email changed. I respect you a lot for your contribution to BTT but it won't be a great thing if we keep misjudging each other. Have a great day

Well, how's it going with iv4n's negative tag? I ask about this here because a specially created thread was blocked ... and I get the impression that the thread was blocked so that no longer listen to those who are against this tag.

I will not be scattered with words, but I also think that the list of mistrust of 3000 names is also 99% meaningless, (except for slowing down pages with bpip logs).

You are mistaken, the impression you were under is misguided I did not lock the thread to avoid reading views against the tag.

Thread unlocked for the time being: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5361695.0

Why you are wanting to promote a scam site? Do you not think that promoting a scam site is equal to helping a scammer and also acting as a scammer? As promoting a scam site refer to a scammer, you  will be considered as scammer if you promote a scam site (1xbit).

I suppose you have gone the post I made on review of 1xbit and tell me where I was wrong. 1xbit made both signature campaign and review thread and I chose not to join their signature campaign because of the controversies supporting betting platform generally. If you check internet you will understand no single betting platform have not witnessed scam accusations in the past. 1xbit review post receive both Negative and Positive review and it was welcome by them because that was what the 1xbit want.

I just read your 1xbit review. To be honest, it's not worth a cent. If they pay you for that, they can be considered deceived. It's not a review, it is more of a pure enumeration of what is on their site. if I don't know anything about them, what you wrote will certainly not convince me to use their service.
I would rather label you as someone who writes nonsense just for the sake of a monetary reward.

About your negative tag, Jolly wants to mark all paid 1xbit supporters. that is his right here. it wouldn't be a problem for you that he is not a DT member and that makes it difficult for you to participate in other campaigns, where you will write anything to make some money.
So, I guess, JollGood maybe it can just change the explanation in the feedback itself (in your case)

btw. about negative tag to all participants in 1xbit review, I think that's wrong. if there were a case where someone wrote really honestly and listed all their problems (which would turn out to be a negative review), whether such a person should also be marked as red?
if so, why? he wrote the truth
if not, why not? anyone who participates in their campaign should be marked negatively.

And it's back: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5367666.0

I guess they feel that the first one worked well enough for them to do it again.

That or they enjoy watching @JollyGood scream.

Either way, looking at the people who applied it's just another group of people who don't care and are here for the BTC
I wonder how long this one will last.

-Dave

This time it's with reduced payment rates compared to the previous time, but more members will be accepted... and I can already see Jolly point finger is ready on the trigger.

https://i.imgur.com/r0GYKWy.jpg
  

Actually, the more the better! It's not a matter of if they'll spam the forum badly, it's a matter of when they'll do it. And when that moment arrives... well, I'm sure we all remember the Yobit campaign way to much :)
So let them come spam, let them...

They have considerably reduced the rates and hopefully new people with clean accounts should not join this campaign. I am sure that old participants will be accepted again and they will only produce the spam.

Another thing to mentioned here that by lowering the payments and increasing the members, it wont help to reduce the spam anyways. Someone need to tell them the definition of spam.

It is time to bump this thread to serve as a request to all 1xbit signature campaign participants and those applying to join. Please do not join or apply to join a known scam because the number of victims will grow.

The 1xbit scammers are still trying to hide their selective scamming techniques behind a wall of signature campaign participants but it will never stop forum members from posting about them seizing funds under the guise of their Terms and Conditions.

Please do not apply to join a signature campaign belonging to known scammers. Thank you.



https://i.postimg.cc/nrXtGn6v/1xbit-scammers-2022-Copy.png

It may have already been done, but I've I took the time to compile a comprehensive list of all 1xbit signature campaign participants in one place. I hope it proves useful to anyone wishing to add these members to ignore list, or tag them if they haven't done so already.
If you find that I missed someone or I added them by mistake, please let me know. All data comes from their spreadsheets.

Campaign: 1xbit.com signature campaign (over) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5339884.0)
Date: May 25, 2021
Manager: Manager1xBit (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3329829)

Participants: (spreadsheet (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jd9RqLTK10kQJ20CjT0xQfLbYFyQxPW0VYUJ2CFtg4Y/edit#gid=0))

Username	Profile Link	Position
jinxing	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1186951 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1186951)	member	week1-week2
protech77	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1205939 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1205939)	member	week1-week2
yayayo	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=101572 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=101572)	legendary	week1-week3
wildan88	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=373947 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=373947)	legendary	week1-week3
gadado	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=228733 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=228733)	hero member	week1-week3
blackfor3st	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=148841 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=148841)	hero member	week1-week3
sempak	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=520764 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=520764)	hero member	week1-week3
barota	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=970096 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=970096)	sr. member	week4-week10 (BANNED)
raiblock	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=821137 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=821137)	sr. member	week4-week10 (BANNED)
blackviruse	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2874970 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2874970)	member	week15-week18 (BANNED)
tumanggor	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1111207 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1111207)	full member	week1-week21
erdogan	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=153702 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=153702)	legendary	week1-week21
ebede	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2856068 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2856068)	member	week1-week21
alisha-k	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2868461 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2868461)	member	week1-week21
tessnik	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2802917 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2802917)	member	week4-week21
rokokgudanggaram	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1056048 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1056048)	full member	week4-week21
desmong	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3248275 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3248275)	member	week4-week21
neficopa	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=669241 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=669241)	hero member	week1-week21
ipanks	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=877521 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=877521)	hero member	week2-week21
limlims	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=119974 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=119974)	sr. member	week2-week21
rabi3	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=971493 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=971493)	full member	week2-week21
ratash	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1068970 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1068970)	full member	week3-week21
john_nautica	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1153845 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1153845)	full member	week3-week21
toast	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=18457 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=18457)	sr. member	week3-week21
bin-bin	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2667034 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2667034)	member	week3-week21
RILWAN	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2672485 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2672485)	member	week9-week21
theones	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=502210 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=502210)	full member	week9-week21
pipshunter	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=941667 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=941667)	sr. member	week9-week21
tulusikhlas	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1002181 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1002181)	sr. member	week10-week21
izsara	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1168491 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1168491)	member	week10-week21
maju69	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=856694 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=856694)	full member	week10-week21
kyraishi	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=143378 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=143378)	hero member	week11-week21
haidil	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=994347 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=994347)	sr. member	week11-week21
bitgov	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=253969 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=253969)	sr. member	week11-week21
edenhazar	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=505752 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=505752)	legendary	week11-week21
hello_good_sir	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=18161 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=18161)	hero member	week14-week21
mrcmrc	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2783611 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2783611)	member	week14-week21
masplanc	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3284395 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3284395)	member	week14-week21
alpamar99	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=979104 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=979104)	full member	week15-week21
cafucafucafu	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=373003 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=373003)	hero member	week15-week21
timerland	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=153041 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=153041)	hero member	week15-week21
sikke	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=211177 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=211177)	sr. member	week16-week21
sovie	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=328196 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=328196)	sr. member	week16-week21

---

Campaign: [over] 1 week signature campaign ->>The International at 1xBit<<- (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5365104.0)
Date: October 11, 2021
Manager: Manager1xBit (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3329829)

Participants: (spreadsheet (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MT3r7Gtdjqj4SGjWBOfTyaOI1Uu-fgezoSnjCzkcmuE/edit?usp=sharing))

Username	Profile Link	Position
CryptoCraze11 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2218041)	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2218041 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2218041)	Member
SmokerFace (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=880473)	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=880473 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=880473)	Sr. Member
Bagaji (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1004188)	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1004188 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1004188)	Sr. Member
coinism (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=318510)	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=318510 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=318510)	Sr. Member
pieppiep (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=49366)	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=49366 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=49366)	Hero Member
Gosgosking (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3348633)	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3348633 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3348633)	Member
bekti3 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1168479)	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1168479 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1168479)	Member
watergold (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=946210)	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=946210	Sr. member
bilal_jan321 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1813868)	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1813868 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1813868)	Member
Qunenin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=698772)	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=698772 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=698772)	Hero Member

Campaign: [open] Restart of 1xBit signature campaign (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5367666.0)
Date: October 26, 2021
Manager: Manager1xBit (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3329829)

Participants: (spreadsheet (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yI8Gwao8JIEN5g0cmfjoVEBUrVvVTHLgXW_Md0e4spg/edit?usp=sharing))

Username	Profile Link	Position	Participation
Erdogan	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=153702 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=153702)	Legendary	week1-week12
sovie	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=328196 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=328196)	Senior	week1-week12
YinShuiSiYuan	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=195798 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=195798)	Hero	week1-week12
Cryptock	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=251145 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=251145)	Hero	week1-week12
tulusikhlas	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1002181 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1002181)	Senior	week1-week12
maju69	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=856694 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=856694)	Full	week1-week12
bitgov	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=253969 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=253969)	Senior	week1-week12
Ebede	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2856068 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2856068)	Member	week1-week12
Masplanc	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3284395 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3284395)	Member	week1-week12
D-law	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3358680	Member	week1-week12
Naficopa	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=669241 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=669241)	Hero	week1-week12
alpamar99	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=979104 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=979104)	Full	week1-week12
mm2543363580	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=155420 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=155420)	Full	week1-week12
izsara	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1168491 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1168491)	Member	week1-week12
Gosgosking	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3348633 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3348633)	Member	week1-week12
Rabi3	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=971493 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=971493)	Full	week1-week12
og kush420	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=142531 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=142531)	Full	week1-week12
prince malik	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1200584 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1200584)	Member	week1-week12
Theones	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=502210 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=502210)	Full	week1-week12
herurist	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1010039; (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1010039;)	Senior	week1-week12
terrorJR	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=929756 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=929756)	Senior	week1-week12
bekti3	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1168479 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1168479)	Member	week1-week12
Newlifebtc	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3300239	Member	week1-week12
SmokerFace	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=880473 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=880473)	Senior	week1-week12
Alanaz	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1170377 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1170377)	Member	week1-week12
Desmong	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3248275	Member	week1-week12
RILWAN	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2672485 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2672485)	Member	week1-week12
Ratash	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1068970 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1068970)	Full	week1-week12
Tumanggor	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1111207 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1111207)	Full	week1-week12
Sirait	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1112636 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1112636)	Full	week1-week12
S A KHAIR	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1111727 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1111727)	Full	week1-week12
CDC AP	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1083123 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1083123)	Full	week1-week12
galambo	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=45724 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=45724)	Senior	week1-week12
Alisha-k	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2868461 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2868461)	Member	week1-week12
BitcoinAccepted	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=139132 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=139132)	Legendary	week1-week12
EdenHazard	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=505752 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=505752)	Legendary	week1-week12
timerland	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=153041 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=153041)	Hero	week1-week12

---

Campaign: [1xBit.com] - CSGO: PGL MAJOR 2021 - Signature Campaign [PAUSED] (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5369768.0)
Date: November 08, 2021
Manager: CryptoGoonie (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3392728)

Participants: (spreadsheet (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1q9YWHr0X21ShtgV-rbsos7XobZxTYVgkHdFmd--eww8/edit?usp=sharing))

---

Campaign: [1xBit.com] - Sports - Signature Campaign [PAUSED] (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5376183.0)
Date: December 09, 2021
Manager: CryptoGoonie (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3392728)

Participants: (spreadsheet (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18p5mpDKtB013Zh3pktcllCbUEnEcHd3UmAZmsAm_IZ8/edit?usp=sharing))

Username	Profile Link	Position	Participation
diyetisman	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1300017 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1300017)	Member	week1-week3
Trojane	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3360818 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3360818)	Member	week1-week3
MrcMrc	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2783611 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2783611)	Member	week1-week3
kingangel	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=162172 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=162172)	Member	week1-week2
Shagnasty	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=64822 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=64822)	Member	week1-week3
StLucifer	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=65672 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=65672)	Member	week1-week2
TheEconomists	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1949818 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1949818)	Member	week1-week3
Fritwakky	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=460553 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=460553)	Full Member	week1-week2
lulumiya	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=242323 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=242323)	Full Member	week1-week3
goku19	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1115049 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1115049)	Full Member	week1-week3
VanityWallets2015	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=435792 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=435792)	Hero	week1-week2
ipanks	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=877521 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=877521)	Hero	week1-week3
pieppiep	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=49366 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=49366)	Hero	week1-week3
yayayo	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=101572 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=101572)	Legendary	week1-week3
aleandromagno	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=197948 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=197948)	Legendary	week1-week2
mardaed	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=196409 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=196409)	Full Member	week3
bharal07	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=468463 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=468463)	Sr. Member	week3
toast	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=18457 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=18457)	Sr. Member	week3
rijaljun	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1004807 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1004807)	Sr. Member	week3
Jsmbugu	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=930142 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=930142)	Legendary	week3

---

Campaign: [1xBit.com] - Christmas SPECIAL- Signature Campaign [FULL] (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5377751.0)
Date: December 19, 2021
Manager: LimLims (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=119974)

Participants: (spreadsheet (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qW2h8DvI6udSzukfdqMT4S9OjRztwqi467qO2KJSVl8/edit?usp=sharing))

---

He woke up a few days ago after around 19 months of inactivity then asked to join the 1xbit scammers signature campaign.

Another one that puts personal greed before any morals and obligations to this community  ::)

The amount of red on your account shows that nothing can be expected from you. Even with so many complaints against a website, no member would expect anything from those accounts that are promoting and supporting that website. Everyone knows that your activities will not stop, because money is more important to you than anything else.

I really don't understand why he decided to apply and started using signature to promote 1xbit which is known as a scam for a long time. He had managed to bad his reputation simply by not making the slightest effort to check how the reputation of the manager and the campaign he was about to advertise was going, it was bad. But greed, ignorance or maybe financial need are the reasons why he does this. It is deeply regretted.

Until recently, perhaps he had not realized what consequences he had received on his account.

I doubt it. Looking at his post history and long inactivity, it seems just like another alt account awakened for the sole purpose of sponging a few dollars by promoting a scam casino and probably cheating in contests and promotions.

That is what I thought too, it was an alt-account trying to join a signature campaign knowingly to promote a scam website such as the 1xbit scammers.

There are so many sleeper accounts out there that are used sparingly by the puppeteers in the hope they will not be picked up as farming accounts but eventually most of them lower their guard or let greed get the better of them and then they get tagged. That is what happened in the case above.

Thanks so much for compiling the list. I don't have anymore sMerits right now, but I will surely come back to this post when I receive some more. When I get time, I will look through the list to see if there's any scam casino participant who might have not received a red tag for advertising scam.

So long as someone willingly participated into advertising the scam casino for pay. They won't be left out. That's my policy.

Yes, I noticed that they requested deletion of some of the spreadsheets on their Google Drive, so I thought it would be a good idea to archive these lists in some way. It may prove useful for future references.

What you did with compiling the list, that was appreciated. Thank you. Let us hope that any people thinking of sending their funds the 1xbit scammers will hopefully read the threads first and then decide to stay away.

The number of people posting in the threads claiming to be victims is still an-going process, it will only end after the law enforcement agencies shut down the 1xbit scam website and hopefully arrest the scammers operating it and the related websites such as kawbet.

Until then the best thing forum members can do is to warn potential victims to beware of the 1xbit scammers and do not send funds to them otherwise they will be scammed.

He doesn't come and complain about the tag based on his post history but I don't know if he has sent you a PM or not to explain the problem. But now it looks like di is really making a big mistake for his account regardless if it is alt account or main account.

It seems that 2 DT tags are enough to identify him as one of the people promoting the scam site even if only one application post and one general post. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=940289

I participated on this scam casino campaign on week 3 i wore their signature and not knowing that this casino is really scamming people and only for a reason that i thought since they could start a campaign in such a forum i was sure that it's legit. I participated before in old signature campaigns normally without any suspicious about the casino i promote for.
Anyway i wzs surprised to receive a negative trust and checked why is that. I read the reference of my negative trust and found out that many users complaining against this scam casino so i took the signature right away and apologize for wearing it and helping this scam. My attentions are clear i will never do such a mistake again but my mistake was honest and i admit that i should search about the company or the casino I'm promoting to before agreeing to wear their signature. I alreadh contacted many of those who is trying to pomote for 1xbit scam.
 Logfiles who gave me the bad trust i contacted him many times and proved him everything but he is ignoring me which i feel i deserve really but i only want to say that i did a mistake and i wouldn't do it again. Thanks for those who are working to warn people about scammers and save them for their traps.
I alreadh contacted these two participants also and i wanrned them that the casino is a scam and they should stop promoting for it. I wish someone messaged me and warned me before.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1300017
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=468463

I'm not sure how much I can believe in your innocence. You didn't participate in just one 1-xbit campaign, you tried again, but your application was rejected:

https://i.imgur.com/0UYjEVa.png
https://ninjastic.space/post/58831667

It's likely you were already aware of what you were getting into at that time.

It's not about believing me or not. I didn't notice even that i was accepted in the first campaign than tried to join their second one. And after i checked theur spreadsheet i found out that i was accepted. I'm not really that active on this forum especially on last days on the year. Anyways if i knew the truth i wouldn't promote such things. I admitted that i did a mistake not checking the rules and i was believing that the moderators wouldn't let a scam casino run a campaign here. So when i joined i was trusting It's a legit one and i wasn't aware that i would hurt anyone by wearing their signature.
If any of what I'm saying isn't true i would continue on their campaign and wouldn't care. First thing i did after getting the negative feedback i opened and woundered how can a scam casino run a campaign then i found out about the rules. You can check that on the arabic section because I'm more active there.

Plus... you can verify that when i participated on the first campaign there was only this two campaign who were available to members rank. The first my posts were 140 when i wanted to participate then i thought i was accepted so i did for the second campaign where my posts were 143. So i don't understand your point of accusing me of being not honest or not believing me.
What i did i regrette it and i wouldn't do it again. And I'm ready to actually help and warn others at least you can believe my actions

Might be missing something, just scanned a few posts but I think this guy deserves a break, Logfiles hope you'll consider removing the red.  I mean, look at his new signature, he's obviously learned his lesson, plus, If you over tag, it makes each tag less effective.

I believe that you might be correct. Although I included this member in the list of all 1xbit campaign participants, it seems that he did not wear their signature for a long time and was not paid even for one week of their signature campaign. In my opinion, his only mistake was that he didn't pay attention to the negative trust of the campaign organizers, but I believe that anyone who isn't vigilant enough can make the same mistake.
@logfiles maybe this one deserves a second chance after all?

All 1xbit Signature Campaign they not update tread and always have new participants joined every time, I think they waste for getting flag from DT because 1xbit signature just open campaign only without received new participant, I think bad decision for member if want use 1xbit signature code because they will not accepted any more.

https://i.ibb.co/68r6VTH/1xbit-scammers-feb2022-Copy.png

The list of negative trust is getting longer.

If potential players were to apply due-diligence before sending funds to the 1xbit scammers then they would never become victims but people are still using the scam accusation thread to report being scammed.

It is sad to read about more and more victims and alleged victims getting scammed by the 1xbit scammers.

Well, there are still a lot of members who don't care. No matter if it's a scam or not. They don't fear having negative trust. 1xBit allows members to participate in their signature campaign if someone already got a negative trust just because of promoting 1xBit. I understand there are a few needy people, that's why they don't care about scams. But, You will be surprised, Recently I figured out, My country's local Streamers and YouTubers Started promoting 1xBit and they say 1xBit is the most reliable. 1xBit Targeting every local language influencer to promote their scam. Sadly, These guys don't know that 1xBit is a scam platform. I have mailed a few YouTubers but it didn't work. So, How we can stop them?

Yeah and unfortunately i was one of the people that promoted for 1xBit scam without knowing their true face of manipulating people to get in them. In a way or another we are all promoting to this casino and letting it go further in scaming more innocent people. Just for example posting in a thread where a 1xbit promoter poster in the same thread. A visitor who isn't registered in bitcointalk forum visit that topic he gonna see that signature and with a small chance he gonna enter and use 1xbit casino. Like that we are also promoting to it indirectly. Because visitors may not see the negative trust and warnings against the promoters of 1xbit casino. Probably the same way that youtubers started to promote for it as well.
And please can you share these youtube channels so at least we can contact the owners and warn them.

1×bit is a company not individual or participants who is working with 1×bit signature campaign is the scammer, if you hate the company don't extend the problem to participants, some of you don't know that some people use this forum for communication to have rest of peace, since i received tag from op of this thread in gambling section my post is being reporting to moderator every time, that is wickedness in satanic form, i know the reason to make this comment here, post some one should report is a shit post, go to my file i dont discuss off point, i contribute something meaningful, some body here continue to report my post and mod keep deleting my posts 10, 18, even to the extent of deleting post i received merit, if the post is a shit post i will not received merit, wickedness is not a food, stop reporting someone post because is in 1×bit, before 24 hours it will report this particular post.

No one hate the company, they are trying to save the newbie and their new user from been their scam activities victim.

It's funny how a scam casino signature campaign participant act like a victim of the situation when we both know that working for the campaign as make you the target of this form DT member.
Having said that, only naive user of this forum or scam project advertiser like you wont understand that this forum for created for the purpose of discussion that have to do with Bitcoin, blockchain technology and cryptocurrency.

Ouch, no scam payment this week, or will you post more garbage to make the quota?

If your scammy "employer" doesn't care about the utter shit you're producing, that doesn't mean you can just keep posting illiterate drivel without repercussions.

check my file i don't make garbage post for payment, most times i dont meet up post requirements, i came here to add up wisdom of bitcoin, even though i receive payment for advertising to company that had issue with this website, i don't know their root.

 it wasn't my fault, i saw the platform vacant for application and i applied, joining them is what's made me regular here, i do login to forum before i joined 1×bit once a week.

 know you suchmoon as one of good people here and i can't say evil to you, respect is a reciprocal, the attack suppose to go direct or indirect to the company not me.

 Any post i make here will be shared to different of my cryptocurrency platform as evidence of bitcoin communication to people that are not here, let him stop reporting my post, is blocking my outside forum Bitcoin bbusiness i need fresh page of conversation of btc for my page

If you really think that your posts were removed because of your signature, you always can remove them from your profile. right?
When you participate in his campaign, you knew nothing about them. Now you know but still promote it, why? You can enjoy the discussion even if your signature space is blank.
Your every 7th post has been deleted, do you really mean that is an accident and just because of a 1xbit ad in your profile?


https://bpip.org/Profile?id=3300239

Theirs much sentiment in this forum, am even complaining of my post that is deleted from moderators as a result of some one being busy reporting everyone who is participating in 1×bit post, and somebody moved ahead to add another tag for me, adding another tag to someone who has a tag is not miss used of native trust?

What's is the need of adding another tags since the first person has already given and make reference of participating in 1×bit signature campaign, you guys are taking these so personal as even this forum is owned by you guys, i have not see any crime i committed to be having multiple haters from the community.

I saw company that needs workers and i joined them, those that mean I'm a criminal by working with them, assuming this is not online i would have taking some of you court for abusing of human reputation and damage, leaving trust to someone show's that you can terminates some ones live, remove the trust you leave on me, because your evidence is not clear enough to drop tag to me, what about if i remove the signature of the company from my profile and the trust will remain or will be removed, I'm asking you guys that made yourself police and criminal investigation agencies

Not trying to be off topic too much but heres an example.

Say a drug dealer is trying to hire you and you know that hes doing illegal business.
If you go on the streets and advertise his "business" you are in fact doing something illegal aswell. And people mistrusting you for that if you clearly know that they are scammers is fair.

I have been tagged in the past for applying for the 1xbit campaign when I was also pretty new here but I actually didnt campaign for them and am so thankful that I sorted this out with everyone here but it seems like you aren't even acknowledging that you are promoting a scam business.

Just a few words into your post and you are already mistaken. 1xbit is not a company, it is a gambling platform. There is no company.
In this case, it's not about our opinions or our feelings towards the platform, but about the moral standard of the community. When you support generally known and confirmed scammers and by your actions enable them to further scam other members of this community, you deserve a negative tag from DT.

The "company" (whatever you want to call it) you joined is scamming people.  You're helping them scam people.  That's why they're paying you.  Stop it.

OP has been updated to start showing the names of those who have applied to join the 1xbit scammers signature campaign or have promoted the 1xbit scammers in any capacity.

The list will be extensively increased as and when time permits. You all are requested to add the following to your trust list with a tilde therefore effectively excluding and distrusting them:

~1xbit_official
~1xManager
~aleandromagno
~altcointalk14
~apaben
~Bagaji
~BOAEDAN
~Btcvilla
~celot
~coinism
~Fritwakky
~haidil
~HUSTLER
~ipanks
~junmisakiro
~kingangel
~kotwica666
~mostcrack
~MrcMrc
~muratsink
~perla
~qory
~Qunenin
~ropyu1978
~StLucifer
~tazmantasik
~VanityWallets2015
~watergold
~wildan88

If you really think that you can set any conditions on this issue, then you are stupider than I thought.
You have earned negative trust because of your actions; therefore, only your actions may redeem you. But we already know that will never happen, right?

Count me in too

The reasons a very clear. You are promoting a scam, and you're stupid not to realize that 1xbit is a scam. Do you need someone to interpret everything to you?

you missed my name sir.

I had to unignore you to read what you were posting in this thread.

Your name will be added to the list along with others in due-course but you were tagged and added to my trust exclusion (or distrust list) a long time ago.

Thank you to decodx for the list, it saved me time going through the spreadsheets myself. More names added below which in-turn have been added to the list in the OP....

~ajochems
~Alanaz
~aleandromagno
~Alisha-k
~alpamar99
~altcointalk14
~Bagaji
~barota
~bekti3
~bharal07
~bilal_jan321
~BIN-BIN
~BitcoinAccepted
~bitgov
~blackfor3st
~blackviruse
~cafucafucafu
~CDC AP
~coinism
~Cryptock
~CryptoCraze11
~CryptoGoonie
~Desmong
~diyetisman
~D-law
~dodgrad
~Ebede
~EdenHazard
~Erdogan
~Fritwakky
~gadado
~galambo
~goku19
~Gosgosking
~haidil
~hello_good_sir
~herurist
~HUSTLER
~ipanks
~izsara
~jinxing
~john_nautica
~Jsmbugu
~kingangel
~kotwica666
~Kyraishi
~LimLims
~lulumiya
~maju69
~mardaed
~Masplanc
~mm2543363580
~momoamzad
~MrcMrc
~Naficopa
~Newlifebtc
~og kush420
~perla
~pieppiep
~pipshunter
~PonzyManCrazyLiar
~prince malik
~protech77
~qory
~Qunenin
~Rabi3
~raiblock
~RankerCan
~Ratash
~rijaljun
~RILWAN
~rokokgudanggaram
~S A KHAIR
~sempak
~Shagnasty
~sikke
~Sirait
~SmokerFace
~sovie
~StLucifer
~supto005
~terrorJR
~tessnik
~TheEconomists
~Theones
~timerland
~toast
~Trojane
~tulusikhlas
~Tumanggor
~VanityWallets2015
~watergold
~wildan88
~yayayo
~YinShuiSiYuan

Hey idiot!

You gave me red trust for promoting 1xbit, but where do you see i'm doing anything like that?

https://i.imgur.com/YTYXo00.jpg

I think you have some mental problems, don't you?

People like him don't get attention in real life so they try to satisfy their craving here on the forum... more importantly in what way? the most retarded way.
Considering all participants are tagged he still doesn't stop being a Relentless whore.

JollyWood is not sooo Good.  ;D

As and when time permits, I will be adding more names with a tilde ~ for promoting the 1xbit scammers.

A total of 109 names have been added to the list in the OP.

I added you back to my ignore list where you belong.

You seem pretty upset by what he's doing.

Keep it up JollyGood.

Can you explain how it came to your sick head that I have ever promoted 1xbit?

One of the users that i texted a week ago to stop promoting for 1xbit. Came back active today and was asking ti remove the negative trust. I hope he can explain why he kept the signature for too long and if he was aware of the scam of 1xbit

---

Respect yourself at least. Are you saying that you never wore 1xbit signature or applied to join them.Can you prove that?

It's a sock puppet account that's all about the campaign, used for talking shit so he doesn't risk any of the accounts he gets paid to spam with.  Smokerface would be my guess but we'll probably never know for sure.

Thank you TwitchySeal, I will continue to ignore the sock-puppets and paid shills  ;D

I think the best response I have to them is to continue adding more names to the list that is in the OP. 1xbit have introduced a new colourful avatar and are pushing out their new "5" signature and that is all the more reason for forum members to get together to at least try to highlight the 1xbit scammers and those that spread their propaganda because it will hopefully end up saving some newbies from getting scammed.

One of the scam-promotors keeps messaging me:
Lol :D

My subtle response was lost on him:

I emojiedd  ;D  , does this look upset? even while reading your post i had devilish smirk on my face.


Should be: Thank you TwichySeal attention received, i'll keep ignoring so more people unignore me  ::)



So the scam-promoter wants to attention a DT member gets.
It's clear that they messaged the wrong person, should've been JollyWood. The professional attention seeking whore.



This one!!!! LMMMAAAAOOOOOOOOO

Jsmbugu got -ve for promoting 1xbit, JollyWood gave them a Neutral tag or changed their Red tag to neutral. They still have -ve negative from logfiles.


They are wearing in their signatures "Do not promote 1xbit" from "Promoting it",
i wonder if @logfiles is an attention seeking whore but my guess would be no, if they were then they would've changed their feedback to neutral by now.

Of all the members they could have contacted privately they chose you. Maybe they see something in you that they do not see in others  ;D

One thing many people do not understand is that whatever we do for money, be it good or bad will some day, come back to us and we will get it back in the same way we did it, good will get good while bad will get bad back.
I've personally had the opportunity of joining 1xbit campaign but on my first time of visiting the campaign thread, I noticed every one wearing the 1xbit signature had a negative trust, I tried to know why, that was when I discovered that the company is a scam, then I wondered why people are still promoting them, even up till this day.

One thing I've always told myself is that "I can't promote what I can't use", this is one of the reasons why am always very careful when choosing a company to promote as I've ended up investing in several of them I've promoted previously.

@JOLLYGOOD,  it's a good call but the question now is, will those who are called answer?
But that is not very important I guess, what's more important is that the words have gone out, it's up to those who are being spoken to to listen and do the needful.

I am glad you did not apply for the 1xbit signature campaign otherwise your account most probably would have been negatively tagged. The only thing we can do is to try our best to warn people away from scams otherwise the number of victims will increase and leave it to others to take notice or take the advice on.

I do not see the answering of the call (if you are alluding to the 1xbit signature campaign participants) simply because the majority have ignored the call and carried on promoting 1xbit. Some have chosen to stay silent and not complained about negative tags but others have created threads and been a nuisance.

The irony in all this is that many of the negatively tagged members participating in the 1xbit signature campaign are operated by one person. The same puppeteer worked in the same way to promote the Adkinsbet scammers. If 1xbit are not controlling the puppeteer then it is a case of the scammers being scammed by another scammer. If 1xbit are controlling the puppeteer then that means Adkinsbet would be connected with 1xbit - either way they both (the puppeteer and 1xbit) deserve each other.

What to prove ???  ;D ;D ;D  Read my posts history, how could I ever apply for this campaign or promote 1xbit at all ???  ;D ;D ;D

Maybe in this way JollyGood lier will answer to my question:

@JollyGood is a liar and trust system abuser. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5385724.0)

The following users have applied to join the 1xbit campaign therefore have been added to the list in the OP which now stands at 113 shills added with tilde ~

~KarpovE4
~rudolfaxl
~bitjoin
~Emy leklap

We can not take the mods to serious anymore, look which posts they have deleted. I am pretty sure there is some conspiracy going on that all 1xbit posts must be removed, since these posts had enough good quality.
And by the way, this is only a part of my posts. The mods are breaking their own rules now.

https://i.imgur.com/YWN9IFV.jpg

How exactly are moderators breaking the rules?

With the amount of spam you generate every day across multiple alt accounts, I'm surprised you haven't already received at least a signature ban, if not a permanent one.

Messages can not be deleted because of promotion of a site. Only low level posts and off topic should be deleted. Right now, the posts are deleted because I am promoting 1xbit.
So the mods are breaking the own rules - Deleting messages without valid argument. And promoting a website with a signature is no reason to ban people from displaying signatures.
But it is not the first time you are talking garbage. Funny detail that you are DT, how much money did you paid to get that?

And you have proof of this?


Actually, you're the one who's breaking the rules here.


Topic: [SCAM] 1xbit.com | Five Championships - Five Bitcoins Signature Campaign

LOL "good quality". Generic garbage stretched to fill 2-3 lines so as not to look like "good project sir" but it is essentially the same "quality". As evidenced by the fact that you're pooping those posts out every few minutes without even bothering to read the threads you're posting in.

I will try to post here as proof that the accounts promoting this scam are far from creating their own content, but plagiarism and paraphrasing.

Plagiarism paraphrasing
User: rudolfaxl (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=389300)
Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5340262.msg57979857#msg57979857
(archive (https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5797/57979857.html))


https://i.ibb.co/MVQJ1br/Screenshot.png (https://ibb.co/pz5kKgc)
https://news.coincu.com/890-what-is-polygon-matic-detailed-information-on-the-top-1-project-for-layer2-and-matic-coin/


This characteristic is suitable for all participants advertising 1xBit.

Dear @lovesmayfamilis thank you for finding out this,

I want to say I posted here from 2014. 2014 to 2022, it is not a short period of time.

In this long eight-year journey I have never done plagiarism or spam in the forum.

I believe I quoted the source link in that post, but for some reason, the post may not be complete and may have been posted without the source link.

I have already deleted the post, it is not my intentional work, it has been posted without a source link due to any mistake or negligence.

I hope that my previous posts will be taken into consideration without making any decision based on just one accidental wrong post.

And all that time you managed to earn one merit? That must be a new standard of excellence and a testament to the quality of your efforts.


Yeah, it's a real mystery.

A beautiful lie. The link was removed by UFO.
But you forgot that there are archives on the forum, and there are no links there.

https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5797/57979857.html
https://i.ibb.co/B6hQnw9/Screenshot.png (https://ibb.co/pKHMhnS)

Not only are you a liar, you are also a coward.

Why cause I promote 1xbit? everyone has their own willingness to promote something, can I ask why moderators don't ban 1xbit from the forum! you should also give red trust to moderators??


Whatever that was not my intention to do plagiarism, If my goal was earning money by doing plagiarism then surely I've done that vastly.

As far I remember, at that time I've faced some internet connection problem and maybe I opened two blank boxes to write that post.

maybe I added a source link to 1st box and when I click on the "Post" button it was not posted due to a bad internet connection then I copied text from 1st box and pate those words to 2nd box and click on the "post" button,

when I was doing that may be the source link was not copied from 1st box.

not deleted by UFO.

This is contradictory, you quoted the source link but was not included, how come? This is what is called plagiarism

Why did you delete the post, you suppose to just only add the link and see if you will be pardoned.

1xbit posters are mostly spammers, I am thinking they are using their alts for it, even if having alt account is not against any of the forum rule, that does not mean it should be used for spamming, plagiarizing and joining a scam campaigns like 1xbit.

Brother, I didn't make that post to earn money, I was not on 1xbit campaign when I've made that post.
It's not my behavior to do plagiarism, it's a mistake I wasn't aware of, I explained above.

Your words looks like strange. What about it?

Copy:

Copy:

Original:

Copy:

Original:

Copy:

Original:

Copy:

Original:

Copy:

Original:

Copy:

Original:

Copy:

Original:

I didn't check further. But I think there are many more examples there.

You guys are the ones making things worse because the evidence provided lovesmayfamilis shows that you're lying while she was telling the truth about the issue and you're here saying is it because you promote a certain site when she didn't say anything that has to do with that. Besides, your lame excuse could also get other people into trouble.

The forum moderator is making this forum welcoming to everybody and they never moderate scams. This is the reason why the idea of DT members taking over the job happened so that the forum won't be flooded with scams.

@Xal0lex, you have quoted various posts that are made by me for different purposes. only quoted text are shown here not the purposes.

-First of all most of them are posted in 2015/16, almost 7 years ago. at that time most probably I was newbie of full member.
-In some posts, I added screenshots from the source page where the source was mentioned. but images are not quoted here cause maybe those images are deleted from the source.
-You have quoted some posts from my online business thread which I used to sell online. I had to advertise to sell online. I had to create ads with information from the pages from where I used to sell products in the forum so you can't call them plagiarism at least.


-Secondly, most of the posts are not created to spam forums or to earn from the signature campaigns, most of them are business-related advertisements and some are made with images as sources but not visible now. you also have to realize the behind the scene, those posts were good until I join the 1xbit sig campaign, Everything became plagiarism whenever I joined the 1xbit campaign.

Plagiarism has no statute of limitations.



All the posts I have quoted are publicly available. Anyone can view and check them.


You using stolen text to promote your business? And you talk about it so calmly? I wouldn't have anything to do with you. Well, that's so, by the way.

It does not matter for what purposes you use the text taken from other authors, a link to the source must be present. Or at least you need to somehow highlight someone else's text so that it is clear that it is not your text.


I absolutely don't care where you participate and whose signature you wear. I am a moderator and I am obliged to monitor compliance with the rules of the forum (no matter in which section). I was interested in this situation after this post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5359529.msg59296804#msg59296804) and decided to check it out. That's all.

Another one bites the dust:

https://meem.link/i/e3nsycrd.png

Great for 1xBit, one less spammer to pay ;D

Yes, another Legendary account wasted because of human stupidity and greed. A typical example of a scam promoter.
Bye-bye rudolfaxl! Who is next?  :D

If we are not talking about 1xbit to be scam site, plagiarism is forbidden and it is against the rules of the forum, permaban is most likely the result of it. I understand that you are saying that most likely if he did not join 1xbit, his plagiarism may not have been known, 1xbit posters are concentrated on because they are low quality and shit posters. I have not investigated that account, if I investigate, it is possible it was an inactive account before, if not for 1xbit, many accounts supposed to be dormant and unused, but they woke up to apply for 1xbit campaign. When reputable account did not apply, the low posts and dormant alts were taken, the posters are using it to post spam and low quality posts.

Hi @JollyGood, I don't know if this account deserves to be flagged or not.
Link profil : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=998632


He is trying to promote the 1xbit signature campaign to pocket some Bitcoin, as I can see in this thread, there are so many users marked red trust for promoting the 1xbit campaign.
If you have free time please monitor the activity of this user.

Another long-inactive shitposter, as far as I can see. Most of his earned merits come from post that is mostly plagiarism.
I made a report here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg59327375#msg59327375).

Thank you for posting about it. I have given appropriate feedback for the user. I try to look at their threads regularly to tag accounts that promote them and then update the list here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5347222.0


If he had not tried to make money from the 1xbit scammers he might have gone unnoticed for some time more, greed got the better of him and so many others. I hope they give a permanent ban to that user especially after the excellent work you put in to highlighting the plagiarism in the post you linked.

I have checked the link you have shared but I could not find out the answer from JollyGood but there are a lot of answer on the thred I think you have already got your answer. If you are not aware about the answers then you can check this post created by FatFork (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5385724.msg59287782#msg59287782) and I think you will get the valid reason.

The OP has been updated. There are now 120 forum members with a ~tilde next to their names. They are promoting the 1xbit scammers via their signature campaign or have applied to join but were unsuccessful, or they have in some way managed to spread propaganda to support the 1xbit scammers by trying to defend the accusations against them.

Most probably some are alt-accounts created to support the 1xbit scammers whereas some are hacked/sold/stolen accounts. Others are from the same group of farmed accounts that were operated by the Adkinsbet puppeteer as was listed here and most of the names have been connected with the 1xbit scammers: Adkinsbet Shills & Sock-Puppets: "Slender/Slander" and "Donk"  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5313867.0

Either way any and all accounts that are connected with promoting a known scam will be tagged.

1 month later and the account is still alive and kicking. This situation kind of reminds me of Masplanc who was also reported for plagiarism and has never been banned to this day.

What is unfair is I have seen old legendary accounts get banned and never given any second chance when they tried to appeal for months and yet there seems to be more lenience towards scam promoters

I do not know about others but I did not report that post to a moderator before therefore I added the link from FatFork for reference showing the plagiarism and reported the original post from "samputin". Let us give it a couple of days, maybe he will receive a temporary or permanent ban, maybe nothing will happen. If others also report the user for plagiarism then the chances of him getting a ban will hopefully increase.

Hi sir please  Help me

The OP has been updated, another user has been added taking the total list of users with a ~tilde to 121

Sorry, your negative trust will have to remain for now.

You were willing to promote a scam. So which kind of help do you need?

You applied 4 times, which mean you knew what you were doing. Here is the deleted evidence
1. https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5932/59322582.html

2. https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5931/59318159.html

3. https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5931/59319765.html

4. https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5936/59362977.html

igehhh also left a feedback that you account seems to have been stolen. How i wish he had put in the reference link.

Sir, I made that mistake.  Give me a chance, I promised I would never make such a mistake again.Please forgive me for my mistake

As stated earlier your negative trust will remain for now. If you really have changed and want to correct your errors for wanting to promote a scam website then try posting in the forum as a helpful member and begin to build up your trust to show others you are a reformed character.

I would appreciate it if you stop sending me PMs asking me to delete the negative trust. Thank you.

What mistake are you referring to exactly? It seems there were quite a few of them.

• Willingness to promote a scam casino for a few bucks a week. [ref.#1 (https://ninjastic.space/post/59318159), ref.#2 (https://ninjastic.space/post/59362977)]
• Cheating and merit hunting in the "Bitcointalk Community Awards" competition. [ref.#1 (https://ninjastic.space/post/59400331), ref.#2 (https://ninjastic.space/post/59360811), ref.#3 (https://ninjastic.space/post/59178397)]
  
  https://i.imgur.com/P0jKuQI.png
  source: https://bpip.org/smerit.aspx?to=preikaler
• Providing thread bumping services and incentivizing members to spam. [reference (https://ninjastic.space/topic/5373740)]
  
• Ban evasion and bounty cheating with alt accounts. [reference (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg56227228#msg56227228)]

Am I missing something?

Sir I want a chance from you give me a chance.

---

I promised you, I will never do such a thing again. Forgive me like this time.  Give me a chance, sir

@FatFork sir

---

I promise never again will I join the scams bounce.

@FatFork sir

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

I have mentioned this in reply to his PMs and I also replied in a different thread explaining to him I will not remove the negative trust.

He should also understand on top of the reasons I tagged his account because of your desire to promote a scam, others have tagged him for other reasons including the account now being operated by someone other than the original owner.

It seems like he is beginning to spam my threads in the hope the negative feedback will be removed.

Looks like you committed a multitude of offenses. How many chances do you need to be given to chance. Personally, I don't think you are the person that can change. You don't really care about your reputation, all you care about is money. Unfortunately for you, your account's reputation is now messed up.

I agree with you, the member seems to be completely untrustworthy. No matter what he says it does seem it is too late to save the reputation of his account now. I did say to him earlier that he should focus on being a good contributor in the forum and earn his reputation back but he has many of the hallmarks of being a farmed account.

It happens as I think any admin not yet checked the case if they checked then they would take action and probably the admin will ban the account. My account has been banned for two years and I have not got any reduction of the punishment though the fault happen when I was a newbie and got banned while I was sr. member,

Even after everything that was quoted here he still went ahead and re-applied to join the 1xbit scammers signature campaign. He apologised and begged saying he would never make the mistake again yet here is again applying to join the 1xbit scammers signature campaign.

He is a very big joke. After I learned that he had applied for the 1xbit scam casino signature campaign multiple times before trying to delete the applications in order to hide the evidence while asking for forgiveness, I was more than convinced that his apologies were all false and not in good faith.

I would have thought the apologies from preikaler were in good faith had he not received other negative tags for using a stolen account. He literally begged me to remove my negative tag in a succession of PMs but I told him I would report him if he kept pestering me. He tried the same sympathy seeking route with FatFork too.

You are right, his attempts were laughable when he tried to delete the applications to cover his tracks but since it is obviously an account which is part of a group operated by a single puppeteer he might have better success with other accounts on other signature campaigns.

For now I think we gave preikaler too much attention therefore I will not be posting about his behaviour again unless it is essential.

You should be shame of yourself as you tried to promote a scam site and those who help to promote should receive same punishment as you have already received. If you want to remove negative trust from your profile then you should create helpful post and wait atleast several months. Otherwise no one will remove negative tag and also your punishment may long last.

It seems here is another one willing to participate on the 1xbit campaign.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5367666.msg59779310#msg59779310


A pity, so many high ranking accounts wasted for some satoshis... Tag if necessary...

Yes, sadly, another account will be ruined due to greed and human stupidity. Bye-bye, Markinzo. I hope it was worth it.

We know that greed can be a huge motivating factor and that has been apparent throughout this forum. Morals and decency seem to be taken out of the equation when it comes to some members trying to make some money.

Including the one you mentioned, the tally of accounts with a ~tilde has now reached 123 and all of them are listed in the OP.

A new account that decided to ruin its reputation and advertise a scam. I don't know if he's read everything the site he advertised is famous for, but I think JollyGood, you'll draw the right conclusion.

https://i.ibb.co/pX3M424/Screenshot.png (https://ibb.co/Yjt1f2f)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=117350

edit: No. He is aware of this company. ;)

is he too stupid to sell his account reputation on a scam project?
yes, maybe he will get paid but doesn't he think that the money he gets from promoting the scam platform is the result of deceiving the platform's users?

This is weird, he knows the reputation of the platform is bad and knows the consequences. why is he still promoting it?

does 1xbit recruit members personally? (not through the threads they create).
I don't see the account making registrations in the 1xbit campaign thread. or maybe I missed it?

Thank you for posting about this  :)

1xbit are shamelessly using their website as a front to divert away from the facts. The facts are 1xbit are scammers and that cannot be denied.

I think the greed displayed by some members in the forum is shocking. Some members would gladly dump their moral compass for the sake of pocketing some cash.

Hi, JollyGood! What if a 1xbit promoter comes to this thread and apologizes for what he/she has done in the past. Do you believe the community should forgive them? I am not sure if any of those will take the chance if the community agrees to remove those tags. But, I am a bit curious about communities' thoughts about this matter. I didn't bother to create a thread. I guess I can ask the question here.

So, What do you specifically suggest to this guy?

Hello naim027. It might be productive for you in getting a community view on the 1xbit scammers by starting a thread instead of asking the question here but I will try to answer the question for myself. If 1xbit scammers apologised for their scams and returned funds to their victims then I would make a decision about my opinion on them and my tags at that particular time, I cannot speak for others.

As for that user you refer to, he sent multiple PMs asking for the tags to be removed. He literally begged FatFork and myself to have the tags removed by claiming he made a mistake. I sent him hope by saying he should focus on being a good contributor in this forum to show he was a reformed character but as soon as the 1xbit signature campaign opened up again, he re-applied to join. That account is probably controlled by a puppeteer that has farmed many accounts for signature campaign purposes.

Here is what I already suggested to him but he decided to ignore it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5347222.msg59670365#msg59670365

There is no need to waste time discussing such members. People like him are pond scum of this forum. Only two days after begging for forgiveness and vowing never to make such a mistake again, he re-applied for the 1xbit scam campaign. But that's not really surprising given his history of cheating with alt accounts and spamming the forum.

It will depend on the individuals. If I was tagging the users then I would give them enough chances to prove that they realized their mistake and then I would consider changing it to a neutral. There would be members who won't give them a 2nd chance at all.

I have removed feedback from a few individuals who received no payment from the scam casino, but the time frame for wearing a signature was usually just a few days or not more than a week.

Almost all the accounts currently advertising the casino know that it's scam. I won't give anyone any second chance.

I guess that's fair enough. I am asking this question because, When I ranked up to Full member rank, I was looking for the signature campaign and most of the campaign was looking for higher rank members. Some of the other campaigns were full. So, I was also interested in the 1xbit Campaign. But, Before I post my application, I notice everyone participating in this campaign had a negative red tag. I was curious about it, What the heck is happening with them? I dug a bit and read a few feedback from DT members. For a newbie, It's not easy to understand if they are scammers. Especially if they don't visit the Scam accusations subboard or 1xbit ANN thread. I was not aware of them because I didn't know if they are known, scammers. Maybe I have seen one or two scam accusations at that time. I thought it was a normal thing because reputed casinos also have a few scam accusations. But, When I visited their ANN, I was just curious why the forum didn't ban them yet? Back then, I didn't know that scam is not moderated here.

So, if I were a DT. I would give them chance to correct their mistakes. But, As you said, If they know that they promoting scams, They don't deserve a second chance.

Can somebody tell me why the forum accepts that there is signature advertisement for a clear scamming service? Why is there all this effort in tagging people etc. if you could just remove the whole campaign?

The forum (and it's operators) DO NOT REGULATE SCAMS. We, the users do.
That is the entire point of the trust / feedback / merit system.
Act like a scammer get a tag.
Don't and you will be fine.

-Dave

But that does obviously not work when the scammers pay large amounts of money to people so they keep advertising their scam. Next they pay people to silence the normal users by giving large amounts of negative feedback and in the end no normal user can see without research how is the real scammer.

as @DafeF already said, the forum doesn't regulate scammers. and I believe that people who feel cheated by the scammer platform 1xbit are not forum members.
1xbit creates ads on multiple platforms. and people who are going to put their money in should do some research before using a new platform they don't know about.
I'm sure almost 90% of the users of this forum are aware of the 1xbit scam. even those who receive payment from promoting 1xbit signature campaign know it too.

Who is aware of such activity and who can't believe the management but promote that is promoting scam and the user is undoubtedly is a part of scam. And I want to say for this case not only a part of scam but s/he is directly scamming by promoting scam knowingly.

It does  work if a new user does their own research, like we always advise everyone. Imagine you are looking for a casino to use, then come across a 1xbit thread via Google search. You will see negative feedback and red flags on top of the ANN threads
That on top of a lot of scam accusations and negative reviews should be enough to deter a wise person from using the casino.

Where will they buy the negative feedback from?

Members are usually very keen on shady or corrupt DT members, who can be distrusted in no time.

As of now, all 1xbit scammers signature campaign applicants will not receive a negative tag by default when their application is seen.

Instead, they will be sent a PM requesting they withdraw their application. A link will be added in the PM to this thread so they understand why they face receiving negative feedbacks if they display the signature or avatar.

If new participants display the 1xbit scammers signature or avatar 48 hours after they have been sent a PM requesting them to refrain from participating, then they face receiving negative feedback.

That's a good start.  How about all the past applicants who never wore the signature, but whom you've already tagged?  Do you plan on removing those tags?  That would be the right thing to do, in my opinion.

You've finally started to think logically. It's a pity it's so late.

Maybe there is a rescue for you to understand that most of the complaints appearing as spam in the 1xbit thread are simply cheaters who have been caught by the 1xbit security team.

I had to un-ignore you to read what brought you here to this thread.

I do not share your views that most of the complaints or allegations are by those that try to scam 1xbit and have been caught. It seems by far that the 1xbit scammers are using Terms and Conditions are a weapon and excuse to selective scam whether it is 1xbit, kawbet, 1xbet or any other of their fake gaming websites.

As for logic, such was the danger that potential victims were in danger of having their funds stolen I decided to tag campaign applicants. They will probably still get tagged after 48 hours but I only decided to take that course of action because I did the same thing when the Yobit scammers were running riot in the forum with their x10 Banner promotions.

During that time I requested they remove their banners within 48 hours and to some degree it worked because some forum members removed the banners and at some point Yobit shut down their signature campaign though I will not imply I take credit for that: YOBIT SCAM: x10 Banner Promoters Will Be Tagged For Promoting a Ponzi Scheme  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5220208.0)

Keep up the good work bud, I support you 1000% with your efforts here. I've started tagging every one of these morons I see.  They are particularly scummy people too I've notice.  Completely brainless sub-humans.

Thank you very much for the support, I appreciate it and it is nice to get acquainted with you  :)

If you intend to tag associated accounts for promoting the 1xbit scammers you might find opposition from some members therefore please keep that in mind. Thank you once again for your support.

Funny thing is, I'm not a participant in the 1xBit signature campaign but still tagged.

@JollyGood, if you are the most correct person you should at least check first if you want to tag a casual user like me. You can check all campaign Spreadsheets created by 1xBit, am I a participant of them?
If my name is in one of their campaign Spreadsheets then you can tag me properly as it was purely my fault.

It is not justified for user like you to give red tag without real evidence, this is like you are abusing your position.

I did have time to sign up for their campaign, but I didn't even wear their attributes and I wasn't even accepted. So why are you tagging me, do you have a personal problem with me?

Thanks default user, you are free to do what you like.

JollyGood is so jealous that I earn more than him from signature campaign that if he could, he would give negative trust to everyone who even thinks about applying to 1xbit signature campaign.  ;D

Does this mean that if you had been accepted, you would have gone ahead to advertise the scam too?

How different are your moral principles from all those who are already advertising it?

JollyGood has no reason whatsoever to be jealous of you because of your earnings through this scam campaign because he was among the user of this forum that didn't participate in signature for some months before he decided to join the signature paying campaign.
If he could do that before now there's no reason for someone like JollyGood to be jealous of you and for the record, he is one of the users thats no room for scams, spam, and everything that has to do with illegality.

Thats not true. Some users applied for the campaign but later revoke the application some minutes later, and their account was not giving negative trust.

Incredible!  :o   Groupie?  ;D


It is possible that someone has managed to get away from this freak, but this man have not everything right in the head.

I love this story: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5339884.msg57513554#msg57513554

He gave a negative trust to someone who had an account roughly the same as he is on this forum  ;D ;D (his negative have nothing to do with 1xbit  ;) )

There are more such stories if you take a closer look.. As a Groupie, you should know these things  ;) ;D  No offense, just kidding   :P :-X

Some people is been deserved by the token they received. Why the user unyil apply for 1×bit campaign, is not that is not aware that the campaign is scam project, the thing that gave it the courage to apply is because of the first tagged it got from monbux  since 2017-09-21 and it felt that no campaign can accept it. When you cross check the application you will know that it apply their intensionally. So it deserve the tagg. Assuming the campaign functions, it wouldn't have complained

It is a very good decision that the applicant won't receive negative trust from you and instead of the negative trust they will receive a notification (private message) to remove the application and avoid to use the signature as well as avatar of 1xbit. It will help those who will apply unknowingly about the scam activity of 1xbit.

The list in the OP has been updated. Increased from 124 to 129 names in total.

It looks like the relaunched another campaign 1x₿it.com | Benefit Season Signature Campaign | Members + Up to $100/week [OPEN] (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5401757)

I am going to tag a few more users who think their reputation doesn't matter when it comes to advertising scam.

Thread archived for reference https://web.archive.org/web/20220608180653/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5401757.0;all

I wonder how you can name the user who applied twice for this scam.
Probably the first time he escaped the negative tag from being warned. But he again applies for participation in a month. Can this be considered ignorance?
Or do we now have to run after such users with "handkerchiefs" and warn them every time so that they do not stumble?

https://i.ibb.co/XWR197p/Screenshot-1.png (https://ibb.co/kGCjp40)

Remarkably, he appears on the forum only to apply.

And one more

Open up a scam accusation. I don't know how BitLucy alleged scam is connected to a thread warning 1xbit signature campaign participants

Here is the board for scam accusations ----> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0
and the scam report format ----> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260073.0

Yesterday, in line with JollyGood's (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5347222.msg60086159#msg60086159) warning, I also informed MonsterV that participating in this scam will result in a negative reputation score. But besides the fact that the user is already aware that the company he advertises is not welcome on the forum, he left his signature unchanged.
Should we understand that he does not care what to advertise, and how this will affect his reputation?

https://i.ibb.co/mNBbPsp/Screenshot.png (https://ibb.co/Hh2B9vZ)
https://i.ibb.co/YbGr223/Screshot.png (https://ibb.co/CWFrBBz)

Looks like it's about time some people took action as the user ignored the warning to stop promoting the scam site in his signature. He still ignores warnings and continues to promote him to this day, so it's not our responsibility to keep his reputation clean even after being rated so many times.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1159912.msg60337769#msg60337769
https://i.ibb.co/L9XDqG8/Screenshoot.jpg

IMO, he should be tagged like any other user promoting the same scam site. I don't think he should be treated in any special way unless he starts changing his mind and stops promoting the campaign now.

Tags sent: Ignore the warnings and continue to promote the scam site at his signature for a few dollar. I don't trust this user.

I tagged his profile.

He definitely does not care about what he advertised, but rather the money. He is also so stupid on ruining the reputation of the account. 1xbit sig campaign won't be here forever.

I did not tag Freeesta (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=988663) because he removed the signature but I am keeping tabs on his profile. He removed the signature because he was not accepted into the campaign, had it been otherwise, he would be advertising 1xbit scam right now.

I just saw that 1xbit reactivated their new campaign in forum and they are collecting most of the members with negative feedback with low quality posts, and they don't care about that.
Tagging their profiles is not helping very much and it's not giving good results, but good thing this time is they don't have that many accepted members, only eight of them.
Maybe we should all start ignoring all participants in this campaign, and theymos could add some algorithm that would keep ANN topics in lower pages.

I didn't join  campaign after reading this news, and at that time I rarely returned to my account.  after I saw my account I got negative trust from you.  please delete it

Read the whole thread first before posting

I find it's funny how the user that promote scam campaign and got negative feedback, reporting the other users who applied on the campaign to get red tagged too. Do you seek a justice here? any DT users have different view and perspective to give negative feedback and you can't force any users to do what you want, why you not red tagged him?

Why did you apply to carry a scammer's signature and avatar in the first place if it was not your intention to join the campaign?
And most importantly, why is it that you have realized you had negative feedback after almost 3 months after applying for the 1xbit campaign?

He had hoped to cash in his long-inactive alt account via a 1xbit scam campaign, but the plan backfired. The only reason he cares about the negative rating now is because he wasn't accepted into the campaign in the first place.  :D

---

That's a lie. The seclog does not show any password changes on your account.
https://bpip.org/Profile?id=877388

Thank you lovesmayfamilis.

I am sorry for not updating this thread recently but you took steps to advise the user (MonsterV) to remove the signature, which he clearly has decided to not do.

I think it is clear that the income received by promoting a scam is far more important to some users than receiving negative trust. That is their decision and the benefits or consequences of that action are of their own making.

I tagged his account too. I have also updated the OP and added his name to the list. The total number now stand at 130 names.

I've been working here since 2017 however for a couple of years I am inactive in this forum. So, recently I have participated in 1xbit camping & I just made a post of Proof of Authentication & after that I saw that I got red trusts. I never promote the campaign just made a post of Proof of authentication. After that, I sent a message to JollyGood (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1016855) & For my busyness, I have taken a break from this forum. That's why I made the post lately.

 I know I made a mistake I was joining the campaign without doing any research it's my fault and for that, I really apologize & I didn't promote the camping. I just made a post of Proof of Authentication. I am guilty for that please remove the red trust.

I personally don't send red trust for this kind of cases, at least someone has to promote well aware that it's an established scam before I tag them, but you should have yourself to blame. How do you apply for a campaign without looking at the reputation of the casino?

Should we say you didn't even see this?
https://talkimg.com/images/2023/07/19/ZepK8.png

And the warnings that were all over the campaign thread?

Assuming the accepted you. How do we know that you were never going to promote them?