Bitcoin Forum

Here is the list of top 09 bounty managers. The most trusted bounty manager I've ever seen. And working on the Bounty Manager project, I believe you will get 100% payment and will not be cheated. A list of camping management of these managers will be provided below. By looking at them, you can understand why these ten managers have been placed in the top list.

1. yahoo62278
https://i.imgur.com/Tua4QMW.jpg
yahoo62278 Bounty Manager is professional Reliable efficient high trusted and most popular manager. He has completed a total of 85 management campaigns. As far as I know, he has conducted most bounty camping.
[yahoo62278 Campaign Management services (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1704638.msg17085076#msg17085076) ]

2. irfan_pak10
https://i.imgur.com/9yROpRx.jpg
irfan_pak10 Bounty Manager very trusted and honest. The bounties he has managed have been paid 100%. He has done most of the Signature Campaign Management. There are bitcoin and ethereum paid signature campaigns in total: 4. And altcoin paid campaigns total: 15.
[ BountyPortals Signature Campaign Management Services (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5225047.msg53818414#msg53818414) ]

3. Bounty Detective
https://i.imgur.com/Jy1mJNf.jpg
Bounty Detective has become the most popular nowadays. As soon as Bounty Detective's Bounty arrives, the party blossoms. Of all the hunters, this campaign manager is the one who attracts the most bounty. This campaign manager is working with a lot of honesty. And pays the Hunters 100%.

4. CryptopreneurBrainboss
https://i.imgur.com/FqlqTfC.jpg
CryptopreneurBrainboss Bounty Manager is professional. He has completed a total of 67 management campaigns. He paid 100% and all his bounties are successful.
[⬛Brainboss Management Service⬛NFT, Metaverse, GameFi, ANN; Bounty & Signature (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5124215.msg50298258#msg50298258) ]

5. Royse777
https://i.imgur.com/WT4kd2D.jpg
Royse777 powerful promotion strategy campaign Manager. He is trusted manager. He is a translator bitcoin mixer site from English to Russian. His Reviews(⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐) and Vouches.
[Reviews/Vouches (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5328445.msg56711499#msg56711499) ]
He has completed a total of 15 management campaigns. And Holds 2 and 3 campaigns are now available.
[💹📈 Royse777🧢: Campaign Management 💪🔥 Signature | ICO | IDO | NFT (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5328445.msg56711496#msg56711496) ]

6. Hhumpuz
https://i.imgur.com/UYE5BwE.jpg
Hhumpuz escrow. Campaign and Promotions management. He has been running the Bounty Campaign for 3 yearsyears. He has completed a total of 82 management campaigns.
[Hhampuz Campaign Management, Escrow Service & Promotions | Available Now! (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5079097.msg48402142#msg48402142) ]

7. Wapinter
https://i.imgur.com/FUyAnvP.jpg
Wapinter bounty manager is very strong.  He is Telegram Community Management ICO Advisory. He has completed a total of 27 management campaigns.
[Wapinter Bounty Management Services (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5254708.msg54596837#msg54596837) ]

8. joeperry
https://i.imgur.com/yoaF2UI.jpg
joeperry campaign manager is a high quality service an price. I suggest every hunter Don't miss his campaigns. He has completed a total of 12 management campaigns.
[ Joeperry Campaign and Promotion Management Service  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5335086.msg56931157#msg56931157) ]

9. Julerz12
https://i.imgur.com/Namgo5Q.jpg
Julerz12 is a Honest manager. His all bounty campaign successful. He previously managed campaigns: 54. And evry campaign successful.
[🚧[SERVICE] Julerz's Campaign Management (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2522224.msg25760373#msg25760373) ]

You should remove me from the list. 2 of the last 3 bounties I have managed ended up scamming participants. More n more companies are showing up anonymous these days, so opening a scam accusation is worthless.

I'm proud to have an Honest campaign manager like you. So I put you above all.

I'm not sure what you wanted to achieve with this thread, maybe some merits from managers for nice words. but it all sounds like a cliche and kissing ass.
we already have several lists like this, but no one went into a little more serious analysis. No one criticized the manager, they seem to be doing their job perfectly, even we’ve never had more spam and pointless shill for shity projects.

For example, you did not mention BountyDetective's trust rating, where he had a red tag just because of campaign management

In the last several months, I saw many complaints on campaigns managed by irfan_pak10. it didn't look like he was keeping everything under control.
For example:
Bounty scammer get payed without troubles... warnings just ignored (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5366504.0)
Multiple accounts join Campaign irfan_pak10 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5355809.0)
Multiple accounts join irfan_pak10 signature campaign (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5353172.0)

this is no feedback to managers on my part (I do not participate in campaigns and I am not relevant), just pointing out that what you are doing with this thread is nonsense.
Also, you should need to pay a little attention to the text, for some you didn't even write their username well. Hhampuz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=881377), not Hhumpuz (You write it twice so I guess he's not a typo)

btw. How did you count how many campaigns each of them did? whether the numbers are reliable and accurate?

First of all this thread is purely made to earn some merits, as if one searches for a good manager many threads will show up. Especially the one that has been officially recognized by the forum Overview of Bitcointalk Signature Anti-Spam Campaign Managers  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4412712.0). So there is no need of creating one, especially in hurry without focusing on new and imp details.


Secondly coming to @examplens points, I know we have missed people while checking their stakes, but I'm very grateful to the people who pointed them out in the above thread and we looked into them and rejected them and they didn't get paid one where they didn't follow the campaign rules.

I know a few places I accepted many neg rating people the one with multi-account joining, those people who joined A CAMPAIGN with his alts should not be tolerated and must be given a neg BUT only when he joins campaign with his alts too not when he joined a single campaign with his only one account, I can not judge him from his previous actions and remove him from the campaign, i can and will only reject the one who participated a campaign through his alts too, surely then he will be rejected.

[edit]

I'm not discouraging OP for thinking of ideas, it's a good thing you tried, but please next time try something new, that not has been published that actually for the sake of this forum and member of this forum.

Why OP needs to remove you, sir? 2 scam bounties don't determine that you aren't a trusted manager. You have managed many bounties successfully, people never forget about it. Not all projects are easy to be analyzed, especially those projects who have no clear team members. Even everything looks good and they have clear team members, it can end with scams because scammers are smarter right now.

I'm surprised on Yahoo's honesty he got my respect I believe in his reputation he should retain the top spot he deserves it

sujonali1819 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5231849.0) should be on the list he is also trusted and have managed and still managing good campaigns the spelling of Hhumpuz is wrong it should be Hhampuz

You have created a list of top 9 trusted bounty campaign manager but how you decided who should be in number one and who should be on the last? What is the base of your serial? The purpose of creating this topic is promoting someone? If not then how BountyDetective (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2695747) is in number 3 while the user has neutral trust negative impact as well as negative trust and Hhumpuz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=881377) is in number 6?

I don't know the criteria but there should be no ranking at all I can vouch for Hhampuz and Brainboss they are easy to deal with very accomodating, all the bounty managers have their own supporters and strong points and style of managing campaign you'll have to work with them on at least 3 to 5 campaign for them to fully understand how they work, so it's better to change the title and description based on your own opinion, I have no question on the number one spot Yahoo has a claim on the top spot he's an old manager and always on top of the choices.

I'm not sure with the ranking though as we have our own opinion, but I see some popular names in the list and I believe they are trusted. The most popular names are Hhampuz and yahoo62278, they have been here for years and are able to maintain their good reputation though they are not perfect.

By the way, you misspelled Hhampuz to Hhumpuz, you can correct that.

If there's someone who should create a thread like this it should be participants who have worked on all the majority of managers that are on the list or better create a poll and let participants decide who are better ranked first and who deserves to be on the list until now OP has not corrected Hhampuz name.

OP is obviously not particularly interested in developing such a list. his basic idea was to earn some merit if possible. and that's all. Also, some nice words maybe can help in campaign participation in the future.
We can't expect any bounty hunters to write honest overviews, because then he would have to write about the shortcomings of some managers. If anyone of them writes something a manager wouldn't like, there is a risk not to be accepted in some future campaigns.

those users who might as well write an honest review, are generally not participants in the bounty program, so they cannot give a realistic judgment based on personal experience.

Bounty managers come and go. The ones on the list may be trusted. But can we say the same to the projects whose bounty campaigns they are handling? I don't think so. I can still remember many big names in the past as far as bounty campaigns are concerned. They are all gone now, probably not because they are not good managers or they are not trusted but because many of their projects ended up as failures. After all, we all know how the altcoin market is inundated with scams and weak projects.

There is no exact criteria but when anyone will create such a post then the person should user ranking system. It can be on various way. FOr example:
*** UID>base on the time of account creation
*** Number of trust
*** Service started date/time
*** Most earned merit
*** Most Trusted (base on bpip)
*** Most Recognized (base on bpip)
*** Most earned merit (base on bpip)
** Most Posts (base on bpip)
There might have few more.

You need to resize the images so that their size fits the topic, and you also need to reformat the topic.
I suggest you the following:

• Use this code, you can change width and height to make it better
  
  

• Learn more about posting images (with size adjustments), hyperlinks: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3974517.0
• [Tutorial] How to add image, resize image and make image clickable: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2958771.0

---

Give them points (Stars) to have a neutral results > give each member a number of stars from one to five in the following levels:

• The number of campaigns he initiated.
• The money he secured.
• community assessment.
• Communication with clients.
• Fight fraud and low quality posts.
• Campaign Manager activity.
• trust.
• Negative ratings.

Not true. There is solid amount of campaigns under their management, that still havent distributed rewards, even since 2020. And their "follow news" or "wait for an update" is not a solution, but most frequent answer from admins. The best and hilarious part of bounty detective is that guarantee rewards and sometimes escrow funds, yet still wait for permission for distribution from project or wait for distribution fees from them.

I guess he didn't do a research nor have proper criteria to be called the best campaign managers and list is not proper order. So I guess irfan_pak is right here this thread created trying to farm some merits from those listed person or to the people who always fascinated with those guys. There's a list of trusted campaign managers already and to avoid any conflict of interest I guess that's enough and there's no need to create different thread just for it.

This is more a list managers, but definitely not a top of bounty managers. Let me throw my two cents. No offense please.

yahoo62278 - he is one of the best to manage signature campaign of gambling sites with payment in BTC. But he is not very lucky with token/coin campaigns.

irfan_pak10 - I have formed an opinion, that he was good or one of best in 2017-2020, or during ICO/IEO era. Now he rarely manages something, maybe few projects every quarter.

Bounty Detective - they were good someday, and are very popular. I think that have gained such popularity thanks to easy social media tasks. Do 5 retweets per week and that it. Who would have missed basically such "easy crypto" ?

CryptopreneurBrainboss - I have participated only in Bitvest, BTC based signature campaign. He is strict, but fair. Right now I see that he managed multiple "regular" bounty campaigns. Some of them looks interesting. Some... I dont believe these project will ever be demanding.

Royse777 - he is a new player on the field imho. Some campaigns under his management have distributed rewards, some are still pending, pending for a long time. He has a good reputation on the forum, but I think it is too early to make a conclusion what kind of bounty manager he is.

Hhumpuz - I can agree that he is a one of the trusted users and managers. He manages a lot of campaign. But there is a good % of scam among them. However, no one is insured against that.

Wapinter - he is similar to irfan_pak10 imho. Once he was on top, now he barely shows signs of life as a bounty manager.

joeperry - he friends with Peter Griffin. This is enough to be said about him. Joking. Well, my opinion that chance to get a reward in his bounty is greater than from a campaign managed by cooper member, newbie, jr. member or from "project representative". If you are missing "good old bounty times", join his campaigns. Better try luck there.

Julerz12 - I think in his campaigns, hunters have the highest percentage to get rewarded. However, it does not mean his campaigns will make you rich or you will earn "big money", a lot. The right words will be - you will get rewarded, you will be able to sell reward.

I would say, if these managers consider running signature campaigns with payment in BTC, I would consider joining it, as these campaigns wont end or be put on forever pause in 1-3 weeks. Speaking about token/coin campaigns - I simply dont believe in such bounties anymore.

Personally I find that Yahoo doesn't seem to have much success in 2021 for the campaigns he manages, some of his campaigns are scam specific like VoltNFT -  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5348687.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5348687.0)
But the one responsible for his role and I think he's a good guy.  He deserves a good signature campaign manager.

Does bounty hunting make people rich? I don’t have an idea. I guess I have seen some people have abused the bounty & made some good amount of money. Otherwise, isn't the reward too low?

Personally, I like Yahoo & Hhampuz for their professionalism. I have seen them to manage a lot of campaigns & have never seen any issue either.

Way back before 2017 there are many campaigns give good profits to their participants and if you participate on various campaign you could provably earn a lot of money at that time, but for now I doubt it since campaign are not paying good so I guess making rich discussion upon joining those is not really possible at the moment.

I also like Hhampuz and yahoo since their experience to handle campaigns is what aspirant managers to look at and many people admire them for getting a lot of campaigns and the way they handle it.

I took participated many campaigns handled by julerz12 but I don't get dollars (Though he distributed rewards) but all his campaigns rewards worthless or don't arrange any exchanges. But Yahoo sir , Hhampuz , Irfan pak, Cryptopremierbbrainbiass All time the best bounty campaign managers.

I think it is beyond the control of any manager as to whatever happens to the future of the projects whose bounty campaigns they managed, unless they are also part of the development team itself. Whether those projects succeeded or failed to even reach a single exchange, they're not responsible for it. I am quite sure that all the mentioned reputable bounty managers have their fair share of failed projects. And they are not to be blamed, even though an amount of due diligence should be expected from these managers as soon as offers come up.

At present I do not trust any manager. Because now a lot of good managers do bounty scams and they don't pay and if they make ten bounties they make one payment. So it looks like a much better manager. The new manager pays them something. So I think the manager will pay better now. Now the bounty is to get the payment and if there is no payment despite having a good manager If not given then what will happen with good manager.

you're partly right here, managers cannot be held responsible for what happens next with the project and its value of them. but they certainly bear part of the responsibility if they accept everything, without checking the potential of the project and whether it is really worth the effort.
In the end, managers are most often paid in dollars or bitcoin, hence they got their earnings. Who cares about bounty hunters.

if you read the instructions as below.


Obviously, you don't need to trust any Bounty manager, participants and managers are both paid by the company you want to promote, the fault here is not the manager, but the company if they don't pay.

Conclusion: if you want to join the Bounty campaign, don't look at the manager, look at the team and company, every participant doesn't need to trust the manager all you need to believe is yourself sure to join, hesitate to back down, no one is forcing, everything is free.

But if the project is obviously a scam or there are pieces of evidence that the project is a scam the manager must act to stop the campaign, a good manager will not hesitate to do that and is not selfish even if he is going to get paid with tradeable coin,
If you're a bounty hunter you need to set criteria on the kind of project that you're joining, don't join for the sake of joining work smart not harder, you don't have to join everything you only have to pick the right one.

Sorry, but I see this thread just as attempt to hunt merits. We already have mutliple threads dedicated to bounty managers, another one isn't needed probably. And no offence Op, but these huge images looks very bad. And I'm not sure by what criteria you rated managers from 1st to last.
And I'm not really sure that all people in your list manage bounties. Some of them probably working with Bitcoin paying campaigns, which shouldn't be considered as bounties IMO.

Completely agree with you. Manager is also responsible, at least partial. They should do their homework about project before accepting job. Offcourse, it's not always possible to know that project may become scam, so, manager don't have full responsibilty for these things.

No, manager cannot always know whether a project will end in a scam but managers should look into whether the developers or the company they work for are as responsible as they should be. In my opinion manager should do their best to find out. For example, a manager should stop a campaign when a red flag is detected, such as plagiarism in a white paper, and ask the project owner for an explanation.

In most cases, managers just do their job. But sometimes things go so badly wrong that the manager has no choice but to close the campaign. I have seen many good managers stop bad projects where the developer has committed serious errors.

You're both right. However, it is better to assume that even the manager can make a mistake. Anyone who does their own research on projects knows very well that some projects are so well prepared that it is impossible to predict the bad intentions of the creators. Bounty manager is also not able to predict whether the project has a chance of success at all, that is, collecting minimal funds for development. In both of these cases, most bounty participants call the project a scam, which is a mistake if the project collapses. This means that a very large number of people participating in the campaigns do not even understand the basics of how it works. It is better to educate users than advise them to rely on the bounty manager's opinion.

It's very important and it should be at the right time once there is an accusation the campaign should be paused and will only continue if the project is cleared of all the allegations, managers should not be too attached to one campaign, that they will defend it whatever the cost, only in house manager will do that, the manager should keep his reputation clean because the campaign managers competitions are very tough and there are only a few good campaigns to manage.

I envy all those who have been to highest pedestal. Surly they are rock stars and successful in there domain.
I am more interested in knowing Irfan_Pk - how can we find out what campaigns he is managing - my apology in advance if someone find my question silly.

Respect all bounty managers who do wonderful work. Many projects cheat bounty hunters and fail to pay them. This is not the managers' fault.

I agree with the OP, these are good at what they do and am fortunate enough to have had an opportunity to might have worked with all of the listed in the OP and hoping to work with the remaining lot,and out of curiosity how did you arrive at this list, what factors or parameters did you use and have you been part of all these guys campaigns???

My thoughts too, and looking at the names clearly these were cherry picked to get some sympathy merits  ::)

Hope other upcoming managers aren't demoralized by this...