Bitcoin Forum

Deleted content

The math on the Pfizer vaxxes and others is this...

In the past, all vaccines took a long time to develop. In addition, for the last dozen decades, when vaccines came out, they were tested for at least months, and maybe for years before they were turned loose on the public. And there is no other vaccine that, when public results showed that a few people died, that it wasn't immediately pulled off the market.

The Covid vaxxes came out after only a month of attempts to manufacture one, and they were not pulled from the market when people started dying and complaining of other problems.

This is the only vaccine like this. So, being a mathematician, what are the odds? I mean, the odds that the Covid vaxxes are anything other than dangerous? You know. Odds! Not Pfizer information... which would be slanted at best... because they are looking for profits.

I know a nurse who thought about this "Operation Warp Speed." She realized that there wasn't any long-term testing. So she didn't get the Covid vaxx. She is the only nurse in her hospital who didn't get Covid.

8)

sending a message to "pfizer" is like throwing a bottle with a message into the sea hoping that a shipwrecked person will read it :) .
[ I had difficulty speaking with the Italian headquarters of a multinational of the same level, let alone globally...of course unless you know someone working there or on a specific role]

but in general why pfizer? it's not just their problem but in theory something that potentially "afflicts" the entire pharmaceutical industry. this type of communication is best done with an open letter or a publication. a journal with good impact factor is a must.

getting to the bottom of the matter, how to define potentially dangerous research?
from what point of view is "dangerous"?

even if they publish these cryptographic hashes, but don't release the whole dataset (for several reason even commercial), what would be the use at this point?

Seriously that's the only reason? Not the fact that they get tons of mail and have to go trough all the spam?
That's kind of entitled attitude that you would be so important to them that they would pick you from the hundred of other posts from their public email, when countless of people are suggesting similar things? Because don't you think they haven't been suggested this like a hundred times. Probably since 2017 ico phase when blockchain was solution to everything?
Don't you think they have thought about this already. Because even if this space is new to you there have been TON of shillers trying to shill this tech to big pharma and institutions.

Because at the latest after you most likely suggested your own blockchain for this, they just marked you as spam.

You've been fooled by James O'keefe.

I thought you were smarter than that.

If you must spread Project Veritas stories at least do a little research first.  

Probably the only way Pfizer would even to consider to reply your message it would take you to be a shareholder of theirs, holding a hundreds of millions of Dollars.
Otherwise, they do not earn anything by talking to someone of the public in general, specially after the stung operation pulled off by Project Veritas.

Still, does not sound like a bad idea using cryptography that way. Unfortunately, I am not informed enough to give a better opinion.
 

LOL

If your "message" to Pfizer was anything like your posts here then you obviously won't get a response on the grounds of being an entitled prick.

I would like to ask you something, I am being serious and I do not ask you this to mock you or something similar.
Why do you call people around here a nazi so often?

You even called me a nazi in other thread even though you don't know anything about my political views or my skin color. There is a good chance you are calling people of color a nazi.

So, why? Do you have a negative personal experience involving some specific political party in your country?

It is exactly an argument against what you're saying, because what you're saying (e.g. that people who disagree with your ignorant drivel are nazis) is ignorant drivel and makes you sound like an entitled prick. You might not be one (I don't know you well enough) but you sure put a lot of effort into sounding like one.

Why don't you post your "message" to Pfizer here in its entirety, so that we could give you a better estimate on how hard they will laugh if they even bother to read it.

Don't be such a chlurmcklet, I was stating a fact.  You've been fooled by project veritas.  Do some research next time before spreading nonsense.

Please learn to communicate so that I do not consider you to be a chlurmcklet. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5360310.msg60262929#msg60262929)

You started this thread so apparently you felt it's important to tell anyone that you "messaged" Pfizer. You're making a bunch of posts here insulting anyone who posts in your thread. Yet you can't post the "message" itself. I'm getting a feeling that you're even more of a nutcase than I initially thought.

You're lucky circcash was such a complete failure.  If it had even a little bit of success before failing, more people would have learned how clueless you are when it comes to anything cryptography related.  

chlurmcklet.

Well that was nothing but a solid waterproof argument.

Well then you must be happy how wrong you were, and what a relief it must be for you that it wasn't on your shoulders.

Because all you had to do was to google it and get about 2 430 000 results, here's the first one:
https://hbr.org/2020/05/why-big-pharma-is-betting-on-blockchain

Well i have good news for you. If you read carefully i wasn't dismissing you.

Actually the reason is because FTX was run by someone intelligent, Circcash was not.

Why would anyone invest in Circcash when it has only one developer, and that developer is so dumb and crazy that when he was updating the code of conduct he accidentally banned himself from working on it?

https://i.gyazo.com/1a8095fe6a5198ea560ca020e84593fb.png

You're banned from participating in the development of the Circcash project.  Editing the code of conduct would be a violation of the code itself.

:D

I shouldn't really pick at people who have problems with their mental health or laugh at their tantrums.
Obviously they need to keep attacking everyone else in panic because they are too afraid to look at the mirror. So to avoid that they live in this destructive self-perpetuating panic loop that's leaking now in here. And while it's kind of sad how much OP really needs help, this is so fucking priceless! Lmao! :D

But seriously, op has a profile similar to unabomber (if unabomber had hurt his brain in a bad car accident) except instead of anti-technology, this one is anti-academic, most likely academic himself, deranged to the point of psychosis and angry, and obvously antisocial. So i am glad he has this forum as a venting channel and reflection he gets from here is from sane people like yourself :).

[quote)
I have recently sent a message to Pfizer concerning their possible gain of function research. I am waiting for Pfizer to respond if they bother to do so in the first place. Here is a press report from Pfizer about those claims.

https://www.pfizer.com/news/announcements/pfizer-responds-research-claims

Well done Sir I must commend you for your bravery, impetus and global mindset but to be honest when  COVID-19 started it was obvious that there was panic and need for the medics to step up the vaccine process due to the mortality rate we recorded globally so the biontech vaccine that Pfizer  came up with was actually approved by WHO after the risk and benefits were properly evaluated and UNICEF were there too... So if you're to take this up just know that you're not fighting Pfizer you're tackling the WHO and UNICEF thus you should channel it to them

Sad