Bitcoin Forum

hey all

I know it is a long thread, but I think this is the way to do it, as I do not want anyone to say I have not said everything.
Anyone who is serious should read it all before giving their opinion. Please respect the effort and hard work to present the scam accusation in full detail

I found the following on this link Blackjack.fun Casino Review | Honest Review by Casino Guru  (http://Blackjack.fun Casino Review | Honest Review by Casino Guru)

there is written - Blackjack.fun Casino is operating without a valid license. correct or not the Blackjack.fun owner did not want to show if it is correct or not  :(

Now let me please explain why I opened this Scam accusation thread

most of the players I saw on Blackjack.fun  free roll tourney tables don't know how to play Blackjack. That is fine and not a problem and good for the casino. They even don't play according the Basic Strategy which would give them best chance to win

I am quite an expert in games and also Blackjack. I love Blackjack. I saw Blackjack.fun here in the forum and went there to check it out. I saw some free rolls with a prize of 1 USDT for the winner. I started to participate and what I saw was shocking that a casino OP will offer such an ugly BJ table design. even worse was that I saw missing details. many users complained about a bug I surely also saw. This bug was frustrating for every participant. I decided to offer my help and feedback to the OP and posted my feedback in his Bitcointalk thread. I have not asked for an incentive because I like to help. I give respect and ask for respect in return.

The following link shows my first posting with my feedback. Please read it as I do not want to fill up the post with to much text as there will be more to come. Also the answers of the OP.
I will do it step by step and in chronological order.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63082551#msg63082551 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63082551#msg63082551)

after my posting a member posted and was frustrated about the bug I mentioned and many other users complained already and it was not fixed and it is not fixed till today. Shame to the OP
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63083204#msg63083204 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63083204#msg63083204)

My response to the last poster and his complaint
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63084685#msg63084685 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63084685#msg63084685)

Next is the response from BJ Fun OP, who thanks everyone for the helpful feedback.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63087696#msg63087696 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63087696#msg63087696)

here my answer to OP
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63087756#msg63087756 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63087756#msg63087756)

Next post of mine thanking the BJ Fun OP as I saw he fixed an important bug I pointed out to him and pointed another helpful idea out
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63089248#msg63089248 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63089248#msg63089248)

A user asked me in the next post why I wanted players with zero chips to be removed from the tables. I replied with my reasoning. If OP would read it he also should understand why to implement it
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63092985#msg63092985 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63092985#msg63092985)

My response with some more feedback
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63093594#msg63093594 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63093594#msg63093594)

BJ fun OP posted and thanked for the feedback and even offered a tip for good feedback. I add - whatever good will means to him
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63094251#msg63094251 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63094251#msg63094251)

Here I gave new feedback and bug and the old bug was still not fixed and very frustrating for every participant.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63098768#msg63098768 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63098768#msg63098768)

Here is the post from the guy I replied to regarding the zero chip players still at the table, thanking me for the answer as he now understands it and also knows that other operators are handling it accordingly.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63103722#msg63103722 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63103722#msg63103722)

Next is my response to the above post. and also a question to all readers - where can I see the tournament rules for these free tournaments in beta?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63104141#msg63104141 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63104141#msg63104141)

Here is the SHOCKING answer from a member and BJ Fun promoter. I hope we have some readers who know the BJ rules, just for info there are many different BJ rules as the casino OP can create the rules according to the house edge he wants to offer.
This shows how unprofessional the BJ Fun OP is, as he does not even know that it is a must to add BJ rules and let users play without the rules he uses.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63104687#msg63104687 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63104687#msg63104687)

Next, I answered about the rules and pointed out another important bug/glitch. I also mentioned that there are other bugs/glitches.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63105056#msg63105056 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63105056#msg63105056)

Here I reported some more glitches and bugs and all these bugs were against the players. Saying this means that these bugs are not in favor of the players and does not make sense to exploit.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63107409#msg63107409 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63107409#msg63107409)


Next the BJ fun OP announced a 200USDT freeroll. only for invites. I asked and PMed for an invite and he accepted.

Next what happened I wanted to participate in another free roll I saw only a KYC site form BJ fun. I wondered why that as I did not asked for a withdrawal. I had 24  USDT and some TRX in my wallet.
I PMed the BJ fun op and asked why  I got the KYC to see and cannot go to the tourney site?

His answer - What is your username?

I gave him my username, even though it was different from my Bitcointalk username. I had nothing to hide as I was only being helpful all the time.

His answer then:
Ahaa, you got it because you abused the bug in blackjack tournaments of course. As you saw other players complained about you.

What was the bug and how did you reset the timer?

So what happened was that I found a glitch (I will explain in more detail soon) and a few players complained about me and BJ Fun OP showed me the KYC which means he actually banned me from playing. strange and unlogical action.

I explained him the glitch in PM and it showed me again that he has no clue about blackjack and the glitches he has in his software.
He insisted that the KYC will stay until I will fill it out. Why should I fill it out? I did not ask for any withdrawal. So I did not fill it out.
He even posted my username in thread. Sorry this is again very unprofessional and should not be done.

According to all of those PMs I posted this in thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63124133#msg63124133 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63124133#msg63124133)

here he exposed my table username in thread. Lets see what all his game providers will say when they get to read this
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63124227#msg63124227 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63124227#msg63124227)

Here is my very direct response to him.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.phptopic=5106215.msg63124315#msg63124315 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.phptopic=5106215.msg63124315#msg63124315)


another user posted then this regarding the Curacao license and I asked the BJ fun OP to show me the license so I can go and verify it but he never answered
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63124335#msg63124335 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63124335#msg63124335)

my answer
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63124374#msg63124374 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63124374#msg63124374)

my next posting
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63124405#msg63124405 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63124405#msg63124405)

BJ fun OP announced the start of the 200USDT tourney with adding a not so nice sentence at least I did not like it
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63124721#msg63124721 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63124721#msg63124721)

my answer
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63124756#msg63124756 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63124756#msg63124756)

a user complained about the 200USDT tourney as it has same bug I and many other users  reported and it was not fixed. Who would offer a 200USDT tourney with so many bugs? IMHO only the one who knows the winner in advance. My 2 cents
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63124941#msg63124941 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63124941#msg63124941)

so the tourney then was canceled hmmm


here I told to OP
I was not in for the money as I just wanted to help. any Legendary user is welcome to propose to whom to give the about 30 USDT as a donation and OP should send it there if he really does not want to steal the money
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63125271#msg63125271 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63125271#msg63125271)

Next post of mine, as I promised to bring it to you in chronological order.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63125292#msg63125292 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63125292#msg63125292)

answer to BJ fun OP to stop his BS
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63125303#msg63125303 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63125303#msg63125303)

the last posting of mine and anyway BJ fun OP closed the thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63125325#msg63125325 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63125325#msg63125325)

Please let me now as promised explain the glitch I found and got the KYC = I see it as a ban.

Playing as always at a 1USDT free roll tourney and the emphasis is on 1USDT and not 100 or 200USDT tourney a player used a glitch where he could reset the timer of 18 seconds until he will play his hand. now you will ask what was his advantage?
His advantage was because the other glitch that I and many others reported in feedback was not fixed. He by resetting the timer for 18 seconds again and again in the last minute of the game he did not give me a chance to bet my hand so he won against me and he also won the tourney in this case as I checked it.

I did not report the player and I did not report the glitch. I did not report him because I was not sure if he knew about the glitch or if he just happened to find it while playing me. I just kept the card sequence and game situation in mind and looked for it so I could reproduce it.

I was playing now to find the right game and hand sequence and by doing this you cannot play a tournament to win it. just for info.
And finally I found it and tried to reset the timer and it worked. I have now reset the timer again and again and again and not just 2 times but for 1-2 minutes I think. it was not in a game or hand situation to win the tournament. OP can check it as he admitted.

I did it because the player who used it before was at the table and i thought he might complain in chat. no one complained in chat. so i thought if he does not complain he knows the glitch and wants to use it again. but if he complains he is clean.

But only a few players complained, as I later found out from the OP, but I do not know if the user who used the glitch is one of them. I did not report it as I wanted to find it again to be sure it was not a one time glitch. but then I was KYCed by OP and he claimed that I won all the money 24USDT by exploiting the glitch. HaHa as firstly he could check it in all tournaments I played and game history and secondly why should I do it for 1USDT? I could wait for the 100USDT and 200USDT tournaments.

let me reiterate that i was not in it for the money but OP actually stole the 24USDT and some TRX into his own pocket. as I don't accept this i asked him in PMs to do the following?

You still owe me 23-24USDT and some TRX. I already suggested in your thread to donate this money to someone in the Bitcointalk forum. I would prefer one of the Legendary users to say to whom to give it. There are 3 I respect very much and would prefer one of them to accept this task.

@Royse777
@JollyGood
@TwitchySeal

and again this after he admitted
-Nobody is forgetting your 24usdt and some trx or something.

since you did not forget the 24USDT and the trx, why did you not contact for example legendary user @Royse777 and ask him if he wants to help? he could open a free giveaway in the games and rounds subforum for the one who guesses the bitcoin price in a week from now. just an example, but this would be a good start for us as you can show your good will.

That is all for now. I know it is a long thread, but I think this is the way to do it, as I do not want anyone to say I have not said everything.
Anyone who is serious should read it all before giving their opinion.

Thank you for reading all if you did.

Everyone is welcome to post or prove to us that Blackjack.fun has a valid license

I will contact also all his game providers to see if they can show me the valid license they surely have from Blackjack.fun if there is one
BTW maybe I should mention that in one of last PMs the Blackjack.fun OP offered me 100USDT if I give him a written list of bugs and what to change. I kindly declined it as I don't trust him

here one of many users complained including me about this bug and till now not fixed. Only this bug is a game killer and not fixed. I did 3 screenshots of his complain in chat. This was not long ago
https://imgur.com/a/rtNknWb (https://imgur.com/a/rtNknWb)


all this because of what? I really don't know. because 24USDT and some TRX? this cannot be after the helpful feedback I gave

there must be a reason

I think you're a little premature with your accusation. As usual you're an asshole and very aggressive with the site.

Here's what I see.

1. you tried to help by reporting some stuff in their thread. Good action by you.

2. They didn't take into account all your suggestions.

3. You exploited the bug yourself, self admittedly.  Whether or not it was trying to reproduce or exploit it still happened.

4. You were asked for kyc after this action and unable to participate. At this point you become aggressive towards the site and decide to be an ass and open a scam accusation.

Sound about right?

From my experience with Blackjack.fun I do not think English is their 1st language. It may not be yours either but I understand you pretty good. Instead of opening an accusation because you were asked for kyc, you should have maybe tried to pm and communicate further without acting out. Maybe get them to understand what and why things happened. If that didn't work, pm their campaign manager and see of he can get the owner to understand.

It's only a scam if they don't allow you to wd. If you ask to wd and pass kyc and they don't send your funds, then it's a scam dude.

you did not change your attitude ( sadly )


the asshole is and was always you

did he do a signature campaign with you or are  you expecting one LOL

your answer is telling me that you did not read the full text I posted. I am  not surprised

BTW I was also premature and the first one who called the Moneypot Scam out

Did you read all of my reply? Or were you just fixated on the asshole portion? Obviously we dislike each other and that's fine, I can still have an opinion and it not be biased.

I mentioned that you could contact their campaign manager and try to find a solution. I passed on a campaign for them long ago due to cultural differences.

I'm not trying to treat you any different than you are treating others.

I read all of your reply. not like you as you did not read my scam accusation in full

you started the asshole shit and not me. this means you are the asshole

To be honest, I don’t see any scam accusation worthy on all the evidence that you present and it’s not even worthy to create a commotion just for free roll issue since the casino acknowledged all the bugs.

You admit that you found a glitch which means they have basis for an abuse. They have the right to exclude you on their promotion base on their own discretion. What I’m just confused right now is why they lock the ANN thread after you create a series of negative post towards them.

They are not cheap scammer but rather you are just angry about their action towards your account which you admit that you exploit a glitch on their newly developed game.

Blackjack.fun team never claimed that they have a real gambling license like the most other casinos. They have registered a company in Costa Rica and it is considered as data processing license. The Costa Rican data processing license (gambling license) isn't regulated like the other gambling license though, but it is valid.

I believe no one going to read the whole story which you have written here and given as reference to make the scam accusations. As I have told you on the casinos license and KYC requirements (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5381143.msg63136465#msg63136465) thread, you aren't going to receive enough support on your accusation against Blackjack.fun, and it is because of the story you have written.

You had reset the timer many times to confirm the glitch, which was completely unnecessary. The KYC verification requirement is a necessary thing for the casino to deal with such cases.

Anyone who has not read the full text and accusation has disqualified themselves and their comments are just guesswork and therefore unacceptable.
But the BJ Fun OP will thank you and the players will suffer and lose money.

You cannot be proud of yourself.

BTW for me they don't have a valid license until proven

To be fair, they implicitly claimed this, when they put a seal of validation at the bottom of their page and it's just a png without a real link to validate their sub-license of Curacao. If they want to avoid misconception, it'll be better if they remove that image from their footer.

https://talkimg.com/images/2023/11/14/zRyH3.jpeg

---

I've read this whole thread and the whole posts on the thread being referenced, starting from where you indicate it, so I believe I am eligible to ask?

Tell me, you said on their thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63124315#msg63124315) that you tried it just to be sure [that it's a glitch]


and on this thread, it is self-revealed that you do this,


is it really necessary? To prove that it's not an one time glitch so you did not report it, after you tried it multiple times, just to be sure? Kinda overkill, IMO.


All of my text above aside, they do have a valid license. I believe Mahdirakib knows what he said, he's kinda good on the field of gambling, so I trust that he's done his DD about Costa Rican data processing license. Thus, in all technicality, they are licensed and good to go. They simply are not under CG's master license [and that's because they have their own license].

If you want it to be proven, though, you're always welcome to run their company number on Costa Rican business registry and see if it's matched. No one holding you from verifying the validity yourself.

fair enough and thank you for reading the accusation in full. it will be a pleasure to answer all your questions with respect

the glitch I found was not the exact glitch which was used by another player against me. it was similar and I need to play a lot to get to the situation and if I get to the card constellation I was looking for I try it. as it is a free roll I did not care as I only was spending my time to find the exact glitch. you can call it overkill but I call it perfection as I am a perfectionist.

now please understand the timing. I did not report it as I wanted to be sure  and as it was not the exact card sequence the player used against me I want to play ( again it is a free roll for 1 USDT  and not 100 or more ) and find the exact card sequence. but I could not play or reach the site as it was KYC what I reached.
then after asking the owner in PM what happened he asked for my user name which I gave him without any problem and then he said ahh there were players who reported me. since then I see KYC and I even did not ask for a withdrawal!

please understand if I would like to exploit this or any other glitch I would not give any feedback or explain the owner the glitch I found. those are free rolls for 1 USDT come on what could I steal there?
but yes someone I did not report is enjoying it as the owner who is also the developer did not fix it and does not know all the glitches. if I can find it he also could find it. something stinks

now to the valid license. to make it short I don't need to check it as the owner should prove it if he is a valid owner of a license as a casino owner

thanks again for your posting

cheers

I think we all will be in a better situation if you informed the platform first about your bug and tell them, "let me try them out for a while with free rolls, there is another bug that I witnessed being exploited by someone, I am yet to recreate the situation. I'll credit my winnings back to you during my entire trial after I managed to recreate it."

It'll save you a whole lot of headache.

Second, about KYC, you do aware that you agreed to it when you registered? True that the clause on their KYC article said you'll be required to perform KYC when you deposited above 2,000 EUR or requesting a withdrawal, but their ToS said,


Have you done the KYC? That's a rhetorical question, you don't have to answer that as I've read that you said you will not do KYC. The point is, if you've do it and they still block your account, then yes, it's a possible scam attempt, but if they asked you for a clause you've agreed and you refused to do so, then it's a breach of contract and they have the full right to do what they did.

As for their license... the owner had prove it, it's on their front page, lower part, right above the article for KYC and ToS,

https://talkimg.com/images/2023/11/14/zRl32.jpeg

whether someone choose to believe it or exercise some scepticism and try to verify it themselves, it's completely their decision. The web owner has provided all that we need.

Thank you again for your straightforward and thoughtful post.

I did not do the KYC as I did not understand in first place why I got it as I did not ask for any withdrawal
and exactly what you are writing here regarding

>if you've do it and they still block your account, then yes, it's a possible scam attempt, but if they asked you for a clause you've agreed and you refused to do so, then it's a breach of contract and they have the full right to do what they did.<

the owner told me in PM at the end of our PMs to give him my address and he will send me the USDT and TRX = about 30USDT all together without asking me for the KYC.
then I asked few times ok but what then? will I still be able to go the site and play and give my feedback?
hmm no answer to this question. I am not the only one who knows the time reset glitch which means right now players are exploiting it even he banned me lol and I really wanted only to help.

as I mentioned I think something stinks but still don't understand what it is. as he did not fix many bugs which even other players reported could be that he or he has a friend who is playing the tourneys. just thinking and saying

cheers

Umm... wouldn't that kinda... close the issue? You were asked for KYC and didn't want to do it, then you're offered to get your remaining balance sent to you without having to do the KYC, I personally think it's a nice solution. As for what'll happen then, I think it's kinda obvious: you both part ways.

They don't want a player who "cheated" on their bugs [disregarding your true intention on that bug exploration] and you, ask yourself, do you still want to play on that platform? Because from what I get from reading your last posts [and this thread] you seemed not wanting to be there anymore too.

Everybody win, case closed, no scam happened.

sorry now you misunderstood it

I id not ask for any withdrawal why should I do a KYC at this point? no reason IMHO

when he understood that I will not give up and will do a scam accusation he wanted to pay me without KYC and even offered 100USDT if I will give him a written document with all bug a I found. I did not want the money I just wanted to go on searching for bugs as there were many and wanted to check especially the one who used the timer reset against me to see what else he has in his hat :)

he behaved very impolite and disrespectful and I cannot let him get away with that. I talked always in thread and in PMs straight forward and helpful and he always tried to not answer or to insult my intelect with his stupid answers

anyway I thank you again for the kind conversation

cheers

Hello BitcoinTalk community.

I will answer here quickly but a detailed answer will take a lot of time.

We never scammed anyone and never will. We believe that honesty is key to success.

Long story short.
1. We are building together with our community one very unique game. No one takes any risks because we just give rewards for free at blackjack freeroll tournaments.
2. New user Jackpotracer (username Hanno) abused our bug.
3. We triggered KYC.
4. He started creating very negative things about our platform on ANN Thread.
5. We locked ANN till this is solved.
6. Jackpotracer started blackmailing us under a threat of scam accusations if we didn't remove the KYC from his account. And started to look for weaknesses.
7. We never accept any blackmailing, whatever it will bring.

Here we are.
We can prepare a detailed answer and address all the things including license, game logs, abuse, communication and so on.  It is a work for devs, admins, campaign managers and for the whole team.

I would like to be removed from the list of members, thank you.

I cannot recall reading threads about Blackjack in the Scam Accusation board therefore this one was somewhat surprising. I have read through the thread and am not entirely sure what the OP is more concerned with, the Curacao logo in the footer area of the Blackjack website or the fact he was asked for KYC. I say these two because the third option (withholding of $24) seems preposterous.

I read your post after I had posted mine. After you have made your post, I am unsure if you even have a case to answer.

Sorry but I do not think you read the whole accusation. your answers are telling me this.

To remove you from the list of 3 legendary is not a problem as I do it only in imaginary as I will not change the evidence of my PM that I send to the BJ site owner. You are welcome not to decide who the money goes to.

The only thing that seems absurd is that you comment without reading the full accusation. I never asked for any withdrawal and received KYC. he owes me 24USDT and some TRX which is a total of $30 and not $24. I even wanted and still want to donate the $30 as I was not in for the money so where is my exploit LOL

The fact is that the owner of Blackjack.fun scammed me and I don't know why as all the reasons he gave are a big lie.

---

Fact is that you scammed me and all your customers with all the glitches and bugs your game has for so many years


that is another big Lie (just read my full scam accusation posting )


another big Lie (just read my full scam accusation posting )

Sorry, I got the notification of your reply yesterday, but I was quite busy at that moment so I just glanced at it and then went straight to bed after. I didn't want to sound that I am cornering you, but I think you misunderstood the point here. I think there are two ways to see this KYC situation, from the customer [you] and from the operator [blackjack.fun], but both brings similar result regarding KYC: that you have to do it.

From customer's perspective, although it's true that you did not ask for withdrawal [whereas the KYC article said you'll be asked for KYC when you deposited exceeding 2,000 EUR or requesting withdrawal] and thus shouldn't trigger KYC from those clause, there is another clause in their ToS that allows KYC request simply because you start betting on their platform, and that they're allowed to suspend your activity until you do so. I've explained it here on #11 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5474047.msg63158320#msg63158320), if I may further shorten it to the bare essential:


So yes, even if you did not ask for withdrawal or made a large deposit, you're still subjected [as you're agreed] to KYC verification whenever the platform deemed it necessary [on this case, they deem it necessary because they suspected a foul play].

From operator's perspective, as briefly brushed above, they require KYC because you triggered their alarm, you're caught cheating on their system by exploiting bug [your true intention aside], this made them worries and require KYC to get a better detail of this "abusive" user and to prevent similar situation to happen again in the future.

Both lead to a situation where you have to do KYC. I understand your confusion that you did not ask for withdrawal and thus [you think] you shouldn't be asked to perform KYC. However, the clause on their ToS allows them to ask this from you, with or without withdrawal and high deposit.

As for why the operator "give up" on KYC, I believe it's actually a good-will and solving a situation. You refuse to perform KYC, they require your KYC, you both in a moot point, so they offered a way out: don't do the KYC, take your balance and leave. As for the 100 USD for listing every bug, that's them rewarding you for bug bounty, many platforms have this kind of bounty, even this forum has it.  You wanted to find their bugs, and there it is, the bug you found so far are rewarded by them, certainly it can be considered as a good will?


Umm... sometimes we need to realize that we've overstayed our welcome, our presence and help is no longer needed, and it's best for us to leave.

 I try to make it short and as I respect you I wanted to answer you

you ToS comment is ok as it is written there and he has every right to ask for it. this does not mean it was ok and fair to ask for it in my situation.

Blackjack.fun owner is insulting my intellect and of all others here and I don't accept it.
when he received complaints from other users about me he did not know it was me  as he did not know my username at the table. that he let me see the KYC after he got complaints this is the way he works and this is fine. but after he asked for my username and he understood the situation he still did not want to remove KYC and this was not ok and fair as he could check the game logs but he did not till now. he was so impudent to ask me for the glitch and I explained it as my conscious was clean and I did not exploit any bug. he even offered tip for bug reports.

I hope it makes sense and I could make my point clear.

thanks again and cheers

MORON ALERT

OP has just admitted he stole 23BTC from his users



and wrote a wall of text to accuse of scam blackjack.fun for 24 USDT he won in freerolls exploiting a bug  :D :D :D

Actually, from neutral ground, that ToS made it ok to ask in every situation, including yours. Especially if we look at it from their lens, where the user was abusing a bug in their system.


May I suggest what's been suggested around this forum so many times: grow a thicker skin.


Unless I read the situation wrongly, I thought they offered you to list all of the bug you know, in exchange for 100 USDT for a reward? You're free to accept or to decline this bug bounty reward.

I would not hold it against anybody for trying to articulate their views but when there is excessive information (in one go without breaks), it does become very difficult for the average person to keep up. In this case, the OP has made accusations but has to accept he voluntarily signed up to a set of Terms and Conditions he should abide by and not only that but if as blackjack.fun (http://) stated the OP exploited a bug, then blackjack.fun really have no case to answer whether it is for $24 or $100 bounty.

He probably has thicker skin therefore is playing the victim because he has been around the forum long enough to know how things work but has opted to go down this route of his own volition.

Also, I have never interacted with the blackjack.fun forum representative but refute the allegation he is insulting the intellect of any member. On the contrary, it seems he is trying to gain sympathy for his failings to tarnish the blackjack.fun website but he not succeeded on that front either.

now I will make shorter

my skin is thick enough but I will accept any stupid scam like Blackjack.fun owner did with me. if you like or not

I declined his 100USDT offer as it showed me that he wants to buy me and no one can buy me.

cheers

---

Congrats for helping a Scammer! the Scammer is Blackjack.fun owner and everyone with average intellect can understand it when reading all the accusation even he could not see the PMs which were changed and would even more show the stupid and primitive scam

it is up to you but without reading the whole thread you have no right to judge anyone

Basically those who don't agree with you are helping a scammer, are assholes, or didn't read the whole thread?

Do you not see how silly you sound? I'm not gonna post in here again as I'm not adding any value except to show users you only accept your opinion and it's pointless to engage in this convo unless we agree with you.

Lock your topic and stay away from gambling. People might decide to like you more.

Two things that has to be straigthened regarding this as they're rather crucial points; One, as I said on the very early part of this discussion, they're not scamming anyone. There's no money lost since your fund was sent back to you, and two, they're not trying to buy you. The way I see it [and I think most who reads it does too] it's some kind of token of appreciation for pointing out the bugs. They don't have to pay you any, but they choose to do so. Likewise, you're not obligated to receive it, but you're free to do so if you give the list of the bugs you discovered.

I'm aware of it as I have been monitoring the license details and KYC requirements of different casinos on time to time to update my thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5381143.0).
About the license validator logo, Blackjack.fun had a Curacao validator link for their Costa Rican data processing license (Satya Code SRL). For some reasons, the license validator link was removed, but the footer image is still there. I updated the information in my thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5381143.msg62572953#msg62572953) during then. I had also asked about it in their ANN thread]in their ANN thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg62604733#msg62604733) and sent them an email too. They had shown the intention to fix it.


Unfortunately, it hasn't happened yet. But there is nothing wrong with their Costa Rican gambling or 'data processing' license.

---

holydarkness has forgotten to mention another part of the terms:


But you are acting like a psycho here as Blackjack.fun team has triggered the KYC verification on your account for the suspicious thing you did. The can apply it anytime, not during the withdrawal only.

sorry but who told you that the money/funds was sent back to me? he scammed me and and all other users. if you iike it or not

cheers


why are you calling me psycho? did I attack you? @Yahoo62278  I know many many years and he behaves like an asshole and will do for money all he can without any scruples.

Give respect and you get respect! easy as that

I have addressed your behaviour as psycho. You are giving long statement here without any valid reason. I can't see the necessity of this scam accusation now. The main part of this scam accusation is: "Blackjack.fun team has asked you to complete the KYC verification, you won't be able to access your account without completing the KYC. You haven't completed the KYC verification yet, and you don't have the intention to do it". Therefore, the case is closed. You are thinking it all in a different way instead of taking the KYC verification requirement normally.

BTW, the consecutive posts are unnecessary. And it is against the forum rules too.

Ahh... pardon the misunderstanding, I thought the fund was already sent back to you, given it's worded like the snippets below. To be technically correct, allow me to revise, there's no money lost since the fund was offered to be sent back to you, and thus, still, there is no scam attempt happened.

You summed it up correctly. It seems as though any member that does not agree with his perspective is somehow in the wrong. I would have no problem at all with asking blackjack.fun about their conduct as long as it was regarding any valid scam accusation. In this case it seems obvious there is something else going on therefore I also will no longer post here, it is time to unwatch the thread.

maybe you and many others thinking it in a different way. the case if you read all is very clear as Blackjack.fun scammed me and many others who are still playing a game with so many bugs and even is not publishing his BlackJack rules at the tables!

Please show me one serious online casino with a valid license or a brick and mortar casino which offers Blackjack and not publishing their Blackjack rules?

and exactly this is one of his other bugs which is hurting all of his current players and I told him about this bug and he did not fix it. guess why that?

BTW thanks for telling me that consecutive post are against forum rules. those were not at all unnecessary! I will post them again as they were very important and proved the Blackjack.fun owner's lies

Can you please tell us again where the scam is? I am failed to see how they scam you as they offered to release your fund, so no monetary lost is experienced. As for bugs that... made players lose the games, wouldn't that technically a player scamming another?

I scan this whole thread and it’s really a lot to digest and confusing at the same time because you didn’t establish well what’s your goal for this scam accusation while you are just fighting to remove KYC requirements to your account even though you didn’t have any intention to claim your money at all based on your previous statement on the first page.

I can’t remember any case here in all casino that they remove their KYC requirements just because user is threatening them with scam accusation. You agree with their terms so it’s just take it or leave it men.


IIRC, You are just newly register to the casino and also the tournament is not available for a long time since last your so this is not true. The glitch and bugs is just to this current version because they trying to add additional feature that is not available to the previous version.

It was not deleted, it just got merged. As Mahdirakib explained (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5474047.msg63164873#msg63164873), consecutive post is against the forum rules, so the mod "delete" your second consecutive post and merge it with the earlier one. It's still there, you can see it merged on post #17 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5474047.msg63160953#msg63160953). Same thing with your consecutive post on #23 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5474047.msg63162716#msg63162716).

thank you very much for pointing me to it and for the lesson  :)

I will delete the last one so it will not be double

sadly the email I got said it was deleted but if they would add in the mail the helpful information you gave now then I would not have posted it again and user would know if it was deleted as off topic or consecutive posting

cheers and thanks and merit on the way

hey all

first of all I invite all who are interested to visit another scam accusation against Blackjack.fun
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5474556.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5474556.0)

Blackjack.fun now lowered their 1 USDT free roll to 1 TRX
and
their 10 USDT to 1 USDT. this free roll he changed in the middle of the registration time after 40-50 plus users already registered. let's see how  many will register and play in next one

I attached a pic and will save the Blackjack.fun owner a lot of headache and some money, just check the pic
but it shows exactly that he is totally overwhelmed with his casino coding as he is the only coder ( very bad coder IMO )

another pic I did now shows a once 1 USDT now 1 TRX free roll tourney starting in 1 minute with only 2 players LOL

I only can say it is a Joke IMO and shows that he does not have a clue how to handle promotions.

why Blackjack.fun owner does not prove and show us the game logs and that he fixed all bugs?

as long he is not doing this he and his casino is IMO not Legit

https://i.ibb.co/cCbhnXz/freeroll-joke-10-usdt-to-1-usdt-but-10-for-winner-lol.png (https://ibb.co/dLb4YJn)

https://i.ibb.co/5FPvBSf/1-trx-tourney-2-playes.png (https://ibb.co/3znWBjL)
image uploading site (https://imgbb.com/)

glad to hear for the OP of the other scam accusation against Blackjack.fun owner ( still Scammer for me ) is solved and that OP is clean and that shows that Blackjack.fun yes scammed him and made a deal to repair it.

this shows how stupid Blackjack.fun owner is as there was no need to start all his lies and to to accuse someone unjustifiably!


https://i.ibb.co/m8TqdL7/scam-accusation-closed.png (https://ibb.co/hf9WrPv)

here is the link to the other Scam accusation thread against Blackjack.fun owner ( for me Scammer ) as it is always good to read and understand the Scammer Blackjack.fun owner behavior
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5474556.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5474556.0)

he closed his thread

Just for info I found this review on Trustpilot site



https://i.ibb.co/CPD6Jq0/trustpilot-review.png (https://ibb.co/BnFG4ms)

This is how stupid JackpotRacer ( still moron for me ) is :  using bold and colour effects like a kindergarten child and repeating the word scam/scammed/scammer 6 times in few lines
 
Also beside being a moron he is also dishonest and manipulative : if relying on trustpilot reviews should also mention the other 110 reviews

https://www.trustpilot.com/review/blackjackfuncasino.com

I reported you again and again to the mod

the moron is you and you  are trying mislead the members here. you should be banned long ago as you are an alias of a moneypot owner.


now let me show how he tries to mislead you. but in color as he likes it and will see it better

just go to blackjackfuncasino.com (http://blackjackfuncasino.com) and tell me if this is the Blackjack.fun casino  ???

yes Moron

there is blackjackfuncasino.com and there is Blackjack.fun

one is a famous one and one is a Scammer. guess now which one?

you should be banned for false accusations and misleading postings

we never forget Scammers


https://i.ibb.co/Kjj4QKv/bj-fun.png (https://ibb.co/vxxyrXn)

the normal way for a Scammer = down down down


1 TRX = 10 cent for the winner. huh participants will come with taxis to join  ;D

https://i.ibb.co/G3vBfRR/3-players-1-trx.png (https://ibb.co/LhzbD11)

hey guys

you should read this quite new thread about Blackjack.fun as it is almost another Scam Accusation thread.
good read for anyone who is interested in the truth about Blackjack.fun

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5479478.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5479478.0)

small reminder

all this because of 24-30$ Blackjack.fun did not want to pay even I did not ask for withdrawal LOL as I did not help them to find bugs because of the money. After their dirty and disrespectful behavior I even refused 100 USDT for a written document they asked me to give them about the bugs and exploits I found.

It is very interesting that Blackjack.fun did not accept my well-intentioned offer after Eva asked me for a solution to the problem.

my offer

Eva

why would you need the community here to help you? Don't you understand that you need to come down form the high tree your boss climbed on? the issue was very easy to be solved when I asked you long ago to donate the about 30$ to one or more members here on BCT and let me back in your site to play the free tournaments to check if there are still exploiters like @Ovum. this should be very much in your interest if you really want to stop and fix exploits. hope you remember that I found
among others the @Ovum timer exploit but sadly you banned me instead of @Ovum

this was what I asked for and nothing will change this as you need to show that you are for real and fair.

I would propose that you will in the name of Blackjack.fun and Jackpotracer open in Game and Rounds something like

"What will be the BTC price on January 7, 2024 at xx o'clock? and pay the first 3 who are nearest to the BTC price each one 10$ in BTC"

and to make it even simpler for you - pay the 3 winners the 10$ in chips of your casino. so maybe you will get new customers

just an example as you can do whatever you think or maybe a community member can propose something nicer

here is the link

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5479478.msg63436226#msg63436226 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5479478.msg63436226#msg63436226)

I read the whole thread and you failed to demonstrate where the "scam" is. You rejected $100 from them:


Furthermore, none of your complaints make any sense.

This is what a rational person would do: stop the obsession & move on to a better site.

Not only that, they actually return his money. That USDT 100 was --or can be considered as-- an extra for finding a bug, his funds were returned in full as he refuses to do KYC. He insist on the accusation because he's still want to play on the site --because he wanted to look for more glitch to help them--, and they don't want him around.

You got your $30 back.

You were offered a $100 bug bounty which you refused.

You have yet to point out what the actual "scam" is and can't name a single victim.

I feel bad for anyone who has to deal with you.

Because... You're not providing them the return address yet? They offered to return it, to an address which they ask you to provide, if you didn't give them any answer, is it their fault that they are yet to process the refund?

Please stop with your lies and wrong info. just read the thread before you give your false info

Read my answer not long ago but not a new proposal from me and then tell us what is wrong with it.
just remember that no one can buy me


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5474047.msg63446759#msg63446759 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5474047.msg63446759#msg63446759)

You propose to be allowed to play on their platform again because you want to help them looking for bugs, and they seemingly declined... I am still waiting for you to pinpoint the scam that they do.

Your scam accusation can be easily supported by the community if there’s an obvious scam happened. Assuming that your concerned is, Blackjack.fun is already willing to compensate to the potential damage for the “bug” that you discovered even though they don’t have bug bounty program.

The problem here is only “YOU” have concern on this bug while the rest of the player on that casino doesn’t bother at all even though they have more play time there than you. Maybe find other victim to support your accusation.

I have just read the whole thread including the posts you linked to from their (now closed) ANN thread. Here are my conclusions and comments.

Were you scammed? No. The casino owner offered you more than what you are owed and you refused it. You keep insisting that you can't be bought.
You keep asking that they donate the $30 (or so) to a trusted legendary member on this forum. I see no reason why they would do that. PM the owner your address, get your $30 or $100 back, and then do with that money whatever you want. No one from their side has to create a BTC price guessing contest or pay anyone else just because you asked for it.

Do I believe that you wanted to exploit the forum for personal benefit? I don't think so. Especially not for something as silly as $1 tournaments. Still, you could have handled the communication in a much more professional manner, which you failed to to. Perhaps your intentions were honest and you wanted to test the exploit you found in as many situations as possible. But the fact is, we will never know. The casino and other players found out that you were exploiting the bug before you reported it.

Is their KYC requirement a scam? No, it's not. Whether you like it or not, the casino has the right to ask for it. Your failure to comply, gives them the right to freeze your funds, and again, whether you like that or not. They were even willing to drop their KYC demands and pay you triple the amount that was locked in your account, and you saw that as them trying to buy you. I am not sure what it is that you want?!

You want back in to play on their site? They don't have to let you back in, and that doesn't make them scammers. As I said, your intentions might be honest, but your actions speak otherwise. You did report some older bugs and some were fixed, others weren't. However, you didn't report the timer reset bug to them and exploited it several times. In their eyes, you are a player exploiting a bug, and thus no more welcome. Accept that and go elsewhere. You can't force someone to accept your help.

Does the owner's/coder's bad programming skills make them a scammer? Not unless you can prove that the bugs are there to intentionally make people lose their money. You haven't done that. You said that a player used the exploit on you, then you used it multiple times on others. So, it's a player cheating other players and not the casino cheating their users.

Could they have removed the KYC demands and allowed you to keep testing their software? Yes, they could have. They didn't have to, though, and it's their choice to do it or not. Not letting you back in isn't a scam.

---

This part is for the casino and it's owner.

@blackjack.fun
If you don't have a Curacao license or if you are not in any way regulated by any Curacao entity, which the public can verify by clicking on the seal, then remove the Cucarao logo from the bottom of your site. It's misleading.   

Have you resolved the bug that OP has identified here regarding the timer reset or can it still be abused? If not, why not? It's obvious that your inability to create a properly working Blackjack game affects the gameplay and outcome of rounds. It's still ok during beta testing and while playing with free money, but it's unacceptable in real-money situations where players are depositing and playing with their own coins.

Each of your games and tournaments should have clearly explained rules. I agree with the OP on this. The lack of such information shows a lack of professionalism. It's easily correctable if you want to correct it.

I wouldn't agree with that. This sub-board is frequented with several individuals who are serious about what they are writing and take their time analyzing these cases. I can mention two from the top of my head who have also written in this thread of yours.

OK. Looking forward to reading what you have to say.

Sorry for late answer

Sorry to disagree, but in this thread so far there has been no one besides you who has read the whole accusation in full and given a fair opinion. Until now, members have posted to show there signature, to attack me for whatever reasons and some who think that Blackjack.fun needs a lawyer on their side.

please let me tell you where I don't agree with you. (I will quote you in red and will give my opinion to it in black)

Were you scammed? No. The casino owner offered you more than what you are owed and you refused it. You keep insisting that you can't be bought.
You keep asking that they donate the $30 (or so) to a trusted legendary member on this forum. I see no reason why they would do that. PM the owner your address, get your $30 or $100 back, and then do with that money whatever you want. No one from their side has to create a BTC price guessing contest or pay anyone else just because you asked for it.

I did not ask to donate to a Legendary member. I asked to choose a Legendary member and gave 3 examples of members and the chosen one who will accept it should open a free giveaway in games and rounds.
as you are talking that I should get $30 or $100 back tells me that you did not understand the problem or you did miss this part. it also looks like that you missed the following part in another thread where I offered again a fair solution (IMO). the link is here
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5479478.msg63436226#msg63436226 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5479478.msg63436226#msg63436226)

Do I believe that you wanted to exploit the forum for personal benefit? I don't think so. Especially not for something as silly as $1 tournaments. Still, you could have handled the communication in a much more professional manner, which you failed to to. Perhaps your intentions were honest and you wanted to test the exploit you found in as many situations as possible. But the fact is, we will never know. The casino and other players found out that you were exploiting the bug before you reported it.

Yes, I found the exploit, but I found it when someone else was using it, which is a big difference since I did not find it and used it to win money in a 1 USDT tourney (LOL). I could wait for a 100 USDT tourney and try to use the exploit to win. again, it looks like you missed it or did not understand what I wrote. I found the exploit when another player used it against me. I then waited for the same situation to come up for me against the same player who used it against me before (in a 1 USDT tourney) and I used it many times in the same moment in the game as I wanted him to understand that I now know the exploit he is using. As it was very obvious what I was doing, I later understood from the owner of Blackjack.fun that players were complaining about me using this exploit. You could ask why didn't the players complain when the exploit was used before? the answer is that the players did not understand the exploit and as it was only once used in the game a normal player will not pay attention to it. you can believe me or not but I was also a casino game tester for some companies. But I used the exploit when the situation came up so many times that even the most stupid player will see it. why would I do this if I want to make money with this exploit?
I asked the owner several times to check the game logs so he could see what I was doing and if I was winning even 1 cent using this exploit. Did he do that? NO - why not???
He could and IMO still can check the logs of all the tournaments I played in and prove to me and everyone that I used the exploit to win the approximately $30.
Again, I tell him to do it and show to all members that I won the $30 using this exploit I found. If he can prove it, I will apologize wherever he wants, close the scam accusation thread and even send him $60 USDT penalty = double what he owes me.

The fact that he did not do this and still let the scam accusation thread run and also locked his thread shows me that he is not a professional casino owner. I know many developers who think they can run a casino, but they couldn't and eventually shut down.

Bottom line = I call it a scam and will bump the scam thread as often as I can. I am well experienced with online casino games and casinos and I can say that he will shut down the Blackjack.fun casino.
BTW I was the first one who shouted Scam before Moneypot owners pulled the rug against their Bankroll Investors, which is why they hate me

Sorry that the answer was longer then I thought. But I again thank you for a fair discussion

Cheers

They don't have to do any of that just like you don't have to post a video of you doing jumping jacks before replying to any of my posts if I demanded it from you. Their refusal to do that doesn't make them a scam.

He might be unprofessional and incompetent like you say, but this is a thread where you are accusing him of being a scammer. Incompetence and even stupidity isn't equal to a scam unless, like I said earlier, there is an intentional reason why those bugs are there.

Without commenting further on the scam allegation itself, I went to the blackjack.fun website to check if they removed the Curacao logo because it gives the impression that they are operating under their licence but the logo is still there. As there is no link added that takes customers to a verification page that shows a valid licence, what purpose does it serve by blackjack.fun showing the Curacao logo?

It is disappointing to see they have not removed a small logo from their website (and they should have done it by now) in order to demonstrate they are not trying to mislead their own customers.

Trying to look important, I guess. Most players are familiar with the Curacao brand, probably not so much with Costa Rica licensed online casinos. I am sure it would take less than a minute to get rid of the logo but they don't want to in an attempt not to remove any "importance" from the website. It should be replaced with a working link proving they have a valid Costa Rica license, though.

It definitely gives confidence to a customer if they see the platform they are gambling on is registered and licenced somewhere. For me personally, the Curacao licence is worthless and pointless because it is being used by the majority of businesses for the very same reason I have cited but nevertheless at least casinos can be held to some sort of account if victims report them to the Curacao authorities.

It should not take long to remove the Curacao logo but they are not doing it. As long as blackjack.fun are not even removing the Curacao logo they should not be used. As for the Costa Rica licence, they should update their link immediately because the conflicting details make them seem very unprofessional: https://blackjack.fun/provably-fair/toc

I wouldn't call it worthless. It's better than nothing, but it's obviously nowhere close to the quality and requirements of the Malta Gaming Authority, Kahnawake Gaming Commission, or the UK Gambling Commission. The common person doesn't really know the difference. To them, it's just the name of a brand and logo they see on casino websites. And like I mentioned previously, the Curacao brand is a widespread one, making it a familiar sight.

I understand your stance, it is better to have some form of licence than to have nothing at all and I think Curacao has to be the most commonly used licence when it comes to crypto gambling/gaming. Having said that, the Curacao regulators do not have an exemplary record when it comes to handling complaints and allegations of bias have been around for a long time.

The sooner blackjack.fun remove the Curacao logo from their website the better it is for them and their reputation because (to my knowledge) they are not registered there, their parent company is registered in Costa Rica.

I wonder if their reluctance to remove the Curacao logo is reason enough to give them a negative trust rating?! They are intentionally lying about their license without showing signs that they will correct it. What's more, they have locked their ANN thread on Bitcointalk, showing once again that they aren't interested in communicating with the community. Besides the Curacao logo, Blackjack.Fun also has a Provably Fair logo at the bottom of their website. It's a different matter, but worth checking if the site is provably fair or not. If it isn't, they are again guilty of providing false information and lying.   

As I stated earlier, without commenting on any specific allegation and keeping my reply in generic terms, it certainly does not look good for them. What gives them a lot of benefit of any doubt at the moment (in my view) is that their forum representative was last online in the forum on 25th January 2024 therefore they might not have seen the comments about the Curacao logo amongst others.

I cannot comment on the provably fair issue but hopefully they will post here soon to make a comment about the logo otherwise there is a real risk they could end up with either neutral or negative feedbacks from members that are not satisfied with their response.

The OP of this scam accusation has failed to prove that a scam happened, and so I see no reason to support their claims for the time being. But I do believe that they are misleading their players by showing a wrong license logo. If they don't change it, I will PM the casino admin and ask them to comment about their license information and why they are still displaying the wrong one. If they don't want to take any action and make changes to their site, I will tag them afterwards.

if you like it or not

Blackjack.fun owner scammed me! and others!

I will say it again and again until he pays what he owes me (and it is only peanuts)! But since he cannot buy me, he has to give it as a donation!

He could easily prove me wrong as he only needs to show the game logs, but he will not do it and I will take any bet that he cannot prove that I exploited the game to win. I know who exploited it, and maybe he does not want to show us who exploited the games and won.

You are living in imaginationland where you pull the strings deciding who does what for you and how. In the real world, things work a bit differently. In the real world, you were offered the money that you are owed, but you turned it down. You still do it even today. In your imagination, someone giving you what you are owed is a scammer because they are not dancing to the music you like to play.

No, he doesn't have to do anything! You do with your money as you please. All he has to do is to return it to you, which remains an impossible task because of your reluctance to accept it.

I would be inclined to agree. It seems there is a clear distinction between what the OP has based his scam accusation on and the fact Blackjack.fun are displaying a logo of a licencing authority (Curacao) when they are not even licenced by them. If they respond to your PM regarding why they are displaying a logo from Curacao on their website, do post the reason here.

You are the one living in a fantasy land and so is the owner and developer of Blackjack.fun, he cheated me and not only me and you are playing his lawyer. I don't know why, but there are too many brown noses here, so another one doesn't count much, but not with me.

He still owes me and he even tried to buy me with a dubious offer of 100USDT.

I was wrong with you as I thought you are a fair member.

he is playing all with his license logo. I can tell that he will close soon and pull the rug as moneypot did.

how much is this what they (Blckjack.fun) giveaway?
0.02TRX was added to your balance

how can he pay $30  ???

Maybe you are just a signature presenter and I was wrong.

So he tried to pay you the money he owes you, and you refused.  ::)

If you only wanted $30, just ask for $30. Problem solved.

Seems like you are doing all you can to damage the reputation of this casino for no apparent reason. You can't name what the scam is, you can't point to a scammed party. Nobody should ever bother taking you seriously.

Why should one take you seriously as you even did not take the time to read all ??????????????????????????????

and this all to show us your signature?

If you had read it all, you would know that I never asked to withdraw any money!

Very sad that the signature campaigns is killing all serious discussions, as the campaign manager is not checking those postings.

The feedback I left you almost 4 years ago remains spot on:


A pity you haven't attempted to modify your attitude whatsoever.


Oh don't worry, I guarantee you they are being checked :D

https://media.tenor.com/wC0yQMVNO_oAAAAM/viva-la.gif

According to his logic, he can't be bought. Using that same logic, the owner is a scammer who owns him money and isn't paying up. When you point that out to him, he tells you he never wanted the money and that it's not about the money. 

I agree with you on this. It has become personal for OP. There are multiple posts in this failed scam accusation thread pointing out the petty rewards that the casino owner is issuing to the winners/participants in this tournaments, and OP was making fun of him. OP does not want this to end and looks happy to keep throwing dirt at the casino owner hoping something will stick.

At this point, I am no longer sure OP has good intentions and wants to help fix the bugs on Blackjack.Fun. His attitude and the way he behaves shows otherwise. No one is this bitter that someone is refusing their help. But I can perhaps see him being bitter for not having a venue to exploit that bug he found.     

Coming from someone who take the time to read all [as many others here also did]... which one is it? You never ask to withdraw any money or they are a scammer until they pay what they owe you? Make up your mind.

He can't. In the imaginationland, if JackpotRacer tells you to dance and you don't dance, then you are a scammer. In his world, the Blackjack.Fun admin MUST give the money that he owns JackpotRacer (the money he never asked for) to a random legendary user of Bitcointalk. That random user should then find a way to award that bitcoin to someone else. JackpotRacer suggested a bitcoin price guessing giveaway or something like that.

So you see, it's not just the casino owner that needs to be dancing when told so, the other people he wants to include must dance as well. And when I pointed this out to the OP and how unnecessary and ridiculous it is, I became Blackjack.Fun's lawyer. Plus I turned into the same type of signature spammer that he already classified you and everyone else who posted in this thread as. In the beginning, he had high hopes for me, probably thinking here is someone who will join me in throwing dirt in the direction of Blackjack.Fun. 

You are a blatant LIAR

If you had read all about my accusation of scam, you would not talk like this. As I had many options to resolve the accusation and one was IMO the fairest and you didn't even mention it. which means you intentionally didn't mention it or you didn't read all. in either case shame on you and your signature manager for not stopping you.

As Blackjack.fun is behaving as they do and not only with me as they also have complaints from other players, I tell you and read my lips.

They will shut down and do a pull rug like the owners of Moneypot did and I called it first.

So you are not helping Blackjack.fun or their players with your LIES!

Well, I'll say it's hard to resolve an accusation where there is nothing valid to be accused as there is no scam happened. And factually, and contrary to your belief, I am sure many of us here actually read all that's provided in this thread. Your insistence that no one read because they simply didn't stand in your side and supporting you just highlighted how... wide your mind is.

The future of blackjack and how long will they stay on this business is not related to your thread and your call, because [as said above and numerous times] they didn't do anything wrong to you.

sorry but you also did not read all! easy as that.

Blackjack.fun scammed me and you will not help them and other scammed players with putting a blind eye on it.

very sad that your signature manager is accepting your postings in Scam accusation thread. He should not pay you guys for your postings in this thread and in all Scam Accusation threads as you are only hurting those signature campaign owners

Remember that you heard it here first

Blackjack.fun will pull the rug

LOL. That's the thing: we DID read all, we just don't agree with you. Easy as that.


They didn't scam you. You can't name what the scam is, nor can you name a single other "scammed player." You're trying to trash them for no apparent reason.

@JackpotRacer
Mental illnesses and disorders can be treated. Sadly, many can't be cured. Still, with the right kind of medication, you can live a pretty normal life and escape imaginationland.
Visit a physician in your area and seek help before it's too late. You are losing your grip on reality, and it's becoming ugly. Good luck!

Very disappointing that you are now dropping the level as well.

in this case also for you a big

WOW - Congrats
And once again you have earned a few satoshi for an empty post with no content.


not sure if you can buy the medication (you proposed for me but you actually need em) with the few satoshi you earned now

But if you want, I can ask Blackjack.fun scammer to send you the $30 so you can buy your medication, although not sure it will help.

and as you see I can mirror everyone (even you on your low level) as my second name is Mirror  ;D

Thanks for the laughs

I am bringing to both of your attention that they've replace the license with an African license. Not sure when, I checked their page earlier today [few minutes ago, to be precise] prior to a post. Have to say that this is the first time I heard about them and I am not sure if they're a reputable regulator. I am currently inquiring about PF on that recent thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5485686.0) they're having.

https://talkimg.com/images/2024/02/19/YRniv.jpeg

OK, thanks for the mention which made me aware of this. Last time I checked, they still had a link to the Curacao logo, but I also see the one for The State of Anjouan now. I have never heard of it either, but that's a different topic of discussion. What's important is that the correct one is now displayed. My only question remains if they should have the Provably Fair logo or not.

Going there now.

Thank you. If they did not want to post here at least the debate can take place somewhere else. The most important thing would be to get an understanding of their reasons for not wanting to post here in this scam accusation thread as well the queries raised about their licencing and their provably fair claims. I will post there now.

Blackjack.fun did not scam you, as far as I can see.


OK, it took me a while to get through your whole rant, but didn't you say earlier that the casino offered to pay you what they owed you, but you refused? They even offered you a bug bounty, but you find it unacceptable. Why?


Why should they show game logs? You yourself admitted that you found the bug and exploited it. Re-read your first post if you forgot.

Thank you for the questions

that Blackjack.fun did not Scam me is just your opinion and your questions are telling me that you did not read the whole info I gave or you did not understand or you did not want to understand. my guess is that you did not read the whole info I gave.

I did not accept their bug bounty as they offered it when they saw I will not accept even the 30$ (even without KYC) they owe me as I did not do it for the money. I won the money in a legit way and gave them my feedback which they partly used.
they still owe me $30. yes I told them that I will accept if they give the $30 as a donation and let me play again so I can see if they fixed this exploit and maybe find other bugs

all this Scam for $30 ???
isn't it strange? yes it is! it would be easy to donate the $30 and no Scam accusation and no need to go into not so nice discussions which are hurting them as it looks like.

I never admitted that I exploited the timer exploit. I found it and I am very proud that I found it as till then no one found or reported it. but minimum one user was using it.
when I found it I waited until the situation will come up against this special user who used it and I used it so many times that everyone on the table could see and feel it. it was actually to tell the user who used it that I know what he is doing and he better stop it.
but the players complained about me and Blackjack.fun banned me from the site and asked for KYC even I did not ask for any withdrawal.
that is how it started. as Blackjack.fun is also the developer it would be very easy to check the game logs and to see who used this exploit before me and if I used it to win a 1 USDT tourney LOL
and if I used the exploit to win $30 I would need to use the exploit at least in 20 + tourneys. why didn't he prove it ???
it would be easy for him and I would be the SCAMMER and he would be clean! WHY DID'NT HE DO THIS ???

for me it is a SCAM until he will show the game logs where I exploited the Tourneys. He cannot show it as I did not exploit it. if he could he would do it as it started. he must have a good reason not to show the game logs so we can see who used this timer exploit.

A well known member asked him if he fixed the timer exploit but to be frank I did not see an answer to it. but you can point me to the answer.

let us say he will say YES he fixed it! how will we know that he fixed it ??? I would know how to check it but he did not want to let me in again to play after he will pay me the $30 even without KYC or he will give it as a donation which means I could not check if it was fixed. a fine and fair casino owner would do all to show us and their players that he is not a Scammer
ASK YOURSELF WHY HE DID NOT ???

It is time to remind users of this Scam! All this for about $30 which I did not wanted to withdraw! BlackJack.fun is handled by a Developer who maybe knows how to develop some games but he has no clue how to handle an online casino in a fair way.

I propose to read the original Blackjack.fun thread which they opened now again
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.0;topicseen (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.0;topicseen)

and the reputation thread they opened just to tell people how I am to blame for their scam and to distract from their inability to run their casino! here is the link to the thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5485686.0;topicseen (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5485686.0;topicseen)

https://media.tenor.com/UPtBexEjrqMAAAAe/what000.png


You're literally the only one on this entire forum making that claim, which you have not been able to substantiate to the degree of even 1%.


They are doing just fine but are completely burnt out by being continually harassed by you for no apparent reason. No one here is taking your side BTW. You come across as a deranged lunatic. Worse than that, none of the claims you make are backed by any kind of evidence or logic. Time to take your L and move on to your next would-be victim.

https://media.tenor.com/5YfymoVCTr0AAAAM/you-lose-good-day-sir-willy-wonka-and-the-chocolate-factory.gif

I have different opinion in this. As far as I know them, they are generous, community friendly and fun loving people. On the other thread, I agreed with the wager issue but that does not mean they are scammers. It's simply a business policy.

Do I like the huge wager? No.

Do I start hating them for it? No.

In a business the intention matters. Blackjacks intention are still seem to be in the right direction.

Is it only you they have not paid or others too? Well I know or understand your feeling for not been paid or could not withdraw from the site. But did you also read their terms and conditions before depositing to play games in the casino? BitcoinGirl.Club said, the intention of a company to his customers means a lot that is where a reputation is also build. Because it is from the customers viewpoint that the recommendation must be made. And that is why gamblers should read the rules and play a fair games in the site to avoid unnecessary drama like this.

It is easier to say words out of emotions without having a calculation accuracy.....
It is possible that you may not be able to withdraw your winnings from the bitcoingirl.club or any of their gambling site and the problem might be that you are faulty during registration or you were unable to read their proms and cons after registration.......
.
You were not able to read the terms and conditions of the game before starting the play the gamor staking I must tell you these are some minors that we all failed to understand when registering anything at all you refused to read the terms and conditions we only scroll up very fast to accept and agree to the terms and conditions it is very difficult for this generation to understand how to read stuffs like that systematically and also understand it better to know if that is what you are comfortable doing if the conduit is really fair or unfair to you before sign I don't believe it is actually a scam

Please let's be guided before making any statements in my humble opinion thanks 🙏👍

either you did not read the whole Scam accusation or you did not understand. my guess is that you did not read the whole accusation.

just try again. no offense intended

cheers

@Chibit01

same for you. please read the whole Scam Accusation thread and then give your comments

Thanks comrade I will read carefully to understand better okay thanks for your gentle response and correction

Umm... here's a small help: BitcoinGirl.Club is a username of a forum member, not a casino. The casino being accused harrased here is blackjack.fun, and the only reason he "can't withdraw" from the site is because he did not provide a return address for his fund although they've asked him to provide it. He refuses to be refunded.

Alternatively, if no one complained about that issue, not here or on their chat box, wouldn't it be safe to assume they've fixed that problem? Will it too far fetched to assume someone will also notice how to replicate that bug, and someone else will notice [thus complained] about it on their platform or here on their ANN? Or does it absolutely have to be you the one that verifies it so everybody can rest assured? If so, how do you propose to prove that it is indeed fixed, in a sense that you will not --out of spite-- say it is not fixed yet although [we suppose] it already is, just to stir the pot further?

Thanks alot my amiable comrade for your humble response Ans correction I so much appreciated it from the dept of my. Heart ....
Thanks

Oh, by all means, please do enlighten us on how what I try to convey is invalid. Were you trying to say that it not applicable because no one will be able to be aware of the exploits and replicate the bug, other than you? Or is it because what I said is actually quite applicable, that someone can discover the bug same as you and they'll probably brought it to attention, much like what happened to you when you did the exploit again and again [instead of reporting it directly to their support] to the one who initially discovered it and they reported you? And thus, since what I propose is quite applicable and you can't give a logical rebuttal, you choose to go the other way and made a random statement?

You are proving time and time again that you have no clue whatsoever about the game of Blackjack and its possible exploits/bugs.

you and Blackjack.fun are very welcome to open a Scam Accusation against me as I did not report the exploit [/b]

LOL

Yeah, yeah. No clue about blackjack and possible exploits or bugs and so on and so on. You mind to tell us how is it not possible for anyone else to find it? Or will it be just like this scam accusation: never clearly explained, unfounded, and baseless?


That would be a baseless scam accusation from my side as I am currently not being scammed by you. Unlike you, I am not interested on creating an unfounded scam accusation. Thank you for offering, though.

Please read back where you wrote

...................when you did the exploit again and again

I repeat

if you think I did use the exploit and won whatever amount then you and/or Blackjack.fun should open a Scam accusation against me.

this what I would do if I am in your or BJ.fun shoes

you were not scammed by me but you are the lawyer of BJ.fun

Please try to read a statement in whole, instead of snipping it wherever you like to drive it into a narrative you preferred, disregarding the fact that you distorted the real message it conveys. I mean, come on, I do say that someone can seriously injure themselves if they climb to the height of your ego and immediately jump down to the level of your IQ, but it certainly not that difficult to understand?

But alas, allow me to break this down to you too. The statement is,


it questions the validity of my proposal, that someone can discover the exploit, as in realizing that there is a bug in that game, because someone else use it and they noticed it, much like [get ready for the difficult part to understand... or so it seems, to someone on your level] when they reported you when you did the exploit again and again when you do that maneuver to the one initially discovered it.

Still can't get it? Here, let me try it again: in other words, it questions how your statement applies, that my proposal where, absence of those report, would it not be safe to assume the bug is fixed, since you say that what I try to propose only shows that I have no clue of casino games, especially black jack and its possible exploits.

why are you talking so much ???

let us do it short. Eva also is always answering with new stories instead of a clear answer! it is a YES or No Question

just tell me and everyone if the exploit/bug is fixed ??? is it  ???

Back at you. You always answering with new blabber instead of clear answer of what I inquire: how my proposal is invalid and only shows that I have no clue about blackjack and its possible exploits. So?

Let's see how long you will play the clown here only to show your signature and get a few sats. let's also see how long your signature manager will watch  and allow it

to all other readers of the Scam accusation please also read the Reputation thread from Blackjack.fun. very interesting read for smart people. ( not for clowns )

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5485686.msg63775689;topicseen#msg63775689 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5485686.msg63775689;topicseen#msg63775689)

Yet another post blabbering and evading to address my inquiry. At this point, you might as well just admit that your dismissal to my proposal is baseless and [guess everybody already figure this one out, though] when you can't answer valid points you'll resort to "play clown" and "get few sats". You know it's ok, right? To be wrong? People does that from time to time, I did that, many did that. In fact, the signs of being a big kid is knowing that you made wrong and acknowledging it. Try it some time, it's good for growth.

Honey... did you bother to read my post on BJF's thread? I inquired them exactly that. If they are yet to answer to my question [that's also asked by several other members], how on earth can I give you an answer and 100% sure about it, if they're yet to answer it? Who do you think I am? NSA?

Due to that very same reason, their silence, is why I proposed to you the possibility that if no one complained on their platform or here, the bug is fixed, as there are chances other also find and could replicate the bug just as you did, tried the bug, and others complained about it. Of which your reply was that can roughly summed up as my proposal is invalid and only shows that I am clueless, and I ask [which yet to be explained up to this point] which part of it is invalid?

Feel free to evade it and give no explanation again, and blabber other things instead.

This single sentence itself is eligible to make us question your logic and [borrowing your way-overused word] IQ. It is honestly frown inducing. Can't you see how that sentence contradict and answer itself? I don't know if the bug is fixed or not [I am currently inquiring about that very thing to Eva], and since I don't know about it, how on earth can I say it in a yes or no? You want me to say "yes"? If then it's not fixed, that'll be misleading. If I say "no" and it actually already fixed, I'll be making a false statement. Can't you see this very simple equation?


Hmm... I think it'll be safe to assume and imagine the rough form of that glitch based on your explanation here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63082551#msg63082551), or perhaps the ones in a quite detail, given on the opening post. Can't people guess what's the exploit looks like?


And the reason it's brought and mentioned here if you can't prove it, is...?


On their platform, no. But playing BJ? Yeah, occasionally, for fun. I can't see how this is relevant to your explanation. If may elaborate, and perhaps begin explaining that way overdue explanation?

Hey all

Some members in another thread told me they don't like blue text, so I'm going to change it to green for now.

The discussions in the following threads are very interesting and reveal more and more the real face of Blackjack.fun owner and Eva, the so called representative of Blackjack.fun, as it could still be a one man show, as the owner is also the developer, so why not play Eva, the support lady? Especially Eva twists and turns like a snake, trying to avoid answering very clear questions.

Here the reputation thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5485686.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5485686.0)

Blackjack.fun thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.0)

The Blackjack.fun Scam Is still a Scam as nothing changed beside a lot of Bla Bla and attacks against me instead to be thankful that I found the exploit and other bugs!

Hey again and let's see if green text is more accepted

I gave a long answer in the Blackjack.fun thread to a very decent member @BitcoinGirl.Club who asked me to give a short recap of the events as he did not read all of it as it gets a lot and overwhelming.

I thought it would be appropriate to have it here in the Scam Accusation thread as well.

the link
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63814896#msg63814896 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63814896#msg63814896)

an excerpt of a short example I gave to understand what happened

Let me try to explain it to you with a simple and perhaps silly example.
7 people are sitting at a table in a coffee shop. 10 $100 bills are spread out on the table. I have very fast hands because I am a magician and I take 1 bill and no one pays attention.
In comparison, the blackjack player who used the exploit once to win the tournament would be stupid to do it again in the same game as it makes no sense even he could do it and he might get caught by other players.
back to the table in the coffee shop where I grabbed a $100 bill and no one saw it. but I did it again and again which means I grabbed 1 bill and another bill and another bill. so few or all 7 at the table saw what I did. what did they do? they called the police to file a complaint.

This is what happened when I used the exploit and intentionally exaggerated few players or only one complaint to the owner of Blackjack.fun. The Blackjack.fun owner did not know my username on the tables as he knew only Jackpotracer from his thread in the forum.

---

As some other member politely asked what I want, here is my simple answer ELI5

Anyway, I never asked for a payout and only after their unprofessional behavior towards me I asked to donate the money as I described in the last post. I don't see anything wrong with that as they could apologize and donate the 24-30USDT and all would be over.


Please understand that Blackjack.fun ridiculously accused me of exploiting the game to gain some of the 24USDT they owe me, instead of thanking me for finding the exploit. They did not even prove their accusation and they could easily prove it by checking the game logs. All this because of 24-30USDT I did not even ask to withdraw Hey come on start walking in our shoes

Take a look at this post by a member who has well understood Blackjack.fun, avoiding to answer the important questions
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5485686.msg63774318#msg63774318 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5485686.msg63774318#msg63774318)


Quote from: blackjack.fun on March 07, 2024, 06:32:23 PM

No one took the funds away from you. So, what is the scam about?

Are you not going to answer? Where or How did he use these supposed exploits to his advantage? Where is the proof. How come this question is always avoided

@icopress the Blackjack.fun signature manager caught me red-handed! LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

read his posting in reputation thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5485686.msg63837598#msg63837598 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5485686.msg63837598#msg63837598)

If there was a Negative Merit to be awarded, I would give it to @icopress for this stupid! posting

he and some other poster think by attacking and insulting me they are doing Blackjack.fun owner a favor. In contrary they are hurting him and themselves.

It also does not let Blackjack.fun get away with the scam since it is still open.

Another good point to show that Blackjack.fun is a Scammer

Please check this conversation as it shows how unprofessional the scammer Blackjack.fun is in offering his Blackjack.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63104687#msg63104687 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg63104687#msg63104687)

I asked in their thread where can a player see the blackjack rules?
Blackjack.fun the scammer did not answer this very important question, but a nice member replied that even he did not understand why anyone would want to know the rules as Blackjack rules are known.
Unfortunately, he does not understand Blackjack well enough, but at least he kindly offered to forward my question to the owner of Scammer Blackjack.fun. I never heard back.

Show me a reputable Blackjack casino, online or land based, that does not let the players see their Blackjack rules.

There isn't one, because only scammers don't show the rules.

https://y.yarn.co/374f1c06-5d4b-48ca-bead-7c208c525798_text.gif

You've gone to such ridiculous lengths to accuse this casino of being a "scam" yet this entire time, for.. well would you look at that, 7 pages already.. yet you have yet to produce ONE SINGLE IOTA of evidence behind your claim! Its clear as day there is no way you aren't engaging in some form of extortion at this point.

Look at what has happened: your plan has totally backfired. The reputation of blackjack.fun remains wholly intact yet you've picked up 2 additional negative DT trusts.

If you had one ounce of dignity tucked away somewhere within your twisted mortal coil you would apologize and lock this thread immediately. Nobody has trusted you for years, and even fewer people trust you now. Just quit while you're behind.

Do you really get paid for this shit and lies? even 1 satoshi is too much. Very sad that your signature manager does not stop you.

The whole truth is with me and all your lies and attacks will not help the scammer Blackjack.fun.

This will only end when the owner of Blackjack.fun will apologize for his unacceptable false accusations against me and he will have to donate the 30USDT he still owes me. I answered this already in his main thread.

Since he did not do this, he insists on being accused of being a scammer and cheater with his Blackjack game.

At least I was able to get him to remove the blackjack tournaments from his site. This already helps that other players are not scammed and will not waste their time with this scam.

Not sure though if he also took down his blackjack game as I cannot test it anymore as I am banned from the site. I am sure that he also has some exploits and scams running there as when I was there he did not even let the players know the exact rules of the blackjack game he offers. What a shame.


edit:

I forgot to answer you about the negative DT trust I got. Do you really think I care? Are you that stupid? Ask your doctor to check your brain size, because it looks like something is not fitting in relation to your IQ. Just saying!

I don't participate in Signature Campaigns and never will. Fortunately I have enough to eat. Means let them give the negative trust.

All those DTs who give me Negative Trust are the so called Scammer Hunters and Sheriffs. So called as some of them especially in my case are Scammer Defenders and this is a crying Shame but it is what it is and it works against those Sheriffs. They are giving themselves Negative Trust

Hey guys, please don't forget to check out the reputation thread which seems to have been abandoned by Eva the OP.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5485686.msg63929913#msg63929913 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5485686.msg63929913#msg63929913)

Racer is scummed

Just for info Blackjack.fun locked the reputation thread they opened.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5485686.0;topicseen (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5485686.0;topicseen)

I will open a Reputation thread cause I cannot let it die with all the lies Blackjack.fun stole 30USDT from me. I will post the link later


Here the link to the reputation thread I opened in regards of the locked thread of Blackjack.fun the SCAMMER

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5495165.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5495165.0)

Currently, Even the ANN thread of Blackjack.fun is also locked again along with other threads dedicated against you. I’m not sure what’s happening in the background between you and Blackjack.fun but they seem always afraid to discuss this matter publicly as shown by locking the thread.

They have multiple promotion ongoing in the forum. Maybe give them a break? ::)

you opened a scam accusation for a few bucks of free money ?
like a few dollars ?
the time and energy you waste man for a few dollars shows your IQ

good luck

I really thought you understood the problem, but I was wrong. Why should I give them a break? yes it is 30USDT but it could be much more and it is not a question of amount. I thought this community will really fight thieves and scammers and the amount should never be discussed, but I was wrong.

---

Wrong, it shows your IQ and you are welcome to test and bet on who has a higher IQ and also a higher EQ. You can tell me how much you want to bet.

---

for both of you just read the reputation thread I opened and maybe one day you will understand why Blackjack.fun is a SCAMMER.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5495165.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5495165.0)

He could have finished it long ago and donated 30USDT, but he did not. In this case, you don't need a high IQ, because an average IQ is enough to understand why he didn't. I know why.

It's a very lame move for you to just open a thread in the reputations board complaining about Blackjack.Fun and then immediately locking it. What exactly are you trying to achieve?
People will stop taking you seriously and start looking at you as a troll and time waster. Just saying.

Will?

I fully understand your situation with them. My comment has pun intended maybe the emoji that I use makes it more complicated.

What I’m just simply saying is you are always on their head even though the community is already on their side. They keep locking their ANN thread despite with a lot of active promotion. I’m not what will gonna happened next but I hope they will not abandon the forum and just talk this issue in private properly.

I learned this (immediately locking threads) from the famous member @JollyGood (I changed his name to JollynotGood).
So if you have any complaints send them to JollynotGood but I am sure you don't have the balls to tell him what you think about immediately locking a thread as he might give you red feedback LOL.

Now guess who the troll is? good guess if you guessed yourself!

---

Do you really get paid for one word? oh sure as your Signature campaign Manager is @Little Mouse. maybe you have to give him some satoshi as cashback

---

which part of the community is on their side? only a small part and mostly Signature spammers. I will repeat myself and tell you again that we talk about 30USDT which I never asked to withdraw. The thief and scammer is Blackjack.fun owner.

Just read back all my history here in the forum and tell me a similar story I had to deal with? I had one and it was a big one because I don't care about small or big theft (rug pull).
I was the first to call out the rug pull and scam of Moneypot owners. Just like now they posted so many hate posts and gave me red feedback (still there) and then it happened just like I called it out. They pulled the rug and stole the bankroll of the investors.

Blackjack.fun owner's behavior is the same MO and I will not be surprised if one day they pull the rug and the red feedback I got will still be there.

I don't care about red feedback as long as I go with the truth and I have my own signature.