Bitcoin Forum

None of you f@#$ers have been nice to me, so I will not be nice to you at all.

I tell you that universities have promoted violence against me, and all of you evil people side with the violent evil people. BY SIDING WITH VIOLENT PEOPLE, THAT MAKES YOU LOOK VIOLENT AND EVIL! YOU ARE ALL EXCEEDINGLY EVIL! Do you really think that by siding with violence, you are making a university education more valuable? No. By siding with violence, you are making sure that universities provide a worthless education to most people. YOU DEMAND EVIDENCE, SO I PROVIDE A LETTER FROM THE UNIVERITY, BUT YOU REJECT AND EVIDENCE I PROVIDE BECAUSE YOU ARE BLOODTHIRSTY!

You tell me that I need to take psychoactive medications, AND YOU F@#$ING EXPECT ME TO BE NICE TO YOU ABOUT IT! ARE YOU TOO STUPID TO REALIZE HOW TALKING LIKE THAT COULD PISS ME OFF? THOSE PSYCHOACTIVE MEDUCATIONS HAVE SERIOUS SIDE EFFECTS SUCH AS EMOTIONAL BLUNTING, SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION, AND BRAIN INJURIES FROM WITHDRAWAL, BUT YOU ARE ALL TOO DELUSIONAL TO UNDERSTAND HOW THAT CAN BE A PROBLEM. YOU ARE ALL EVIL!

You are all way too stupid to understand that BITCOIN DOES NOT EVEN HAVE A MINING ALGORITHM THAT IS DESIGNED TO ADVANCE SCIENCE.

None of you know how to have a conversation. I KNOW BECAUSE I HAVE NEVER HAD A CONVERSATION WITH ANYONE IN YEARS BECAUSE MOST PEOPLE ARE COMPLETELY AND UTTERLY DEVOID OF ALL SOCIAL SKILLS!

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

Because it was designed to be digital currency, not a platform for scientific research.  That doesn't seem too difficult to understand for most of us stupid people.  It should be a no-brainer for someone as smart as you.


Considering how smart you are, wouldn't it be within your superior intellectual capacity to possibly, maybe consider that YOU MIGHT BE THE PROBLEM?

That is not the case for reasons I have already mentioned. I am not the problem because fuckers like you are pushing psychoactive drugs on me harder than even Pfizer itself. You are all a bunch of horrible chlurmcklets. F@#$ you. You all just want me to be a f@#$ing zombie. F@#$ you.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

P.S. I have a problem with the people on this site. So what? The people on this site are not a statistically random sample of people. Only a specific kind of person would want to use this site. Since the people on this site are not an approximately uniformly random sample from a population, I have no more of a problem with the people on this site than you do against drunk drivers. Oh wait. You probably hate me even more than you hate drunk drivers because you are that f@#$ed up. But yeah, this site for some reason selects some of the stupidest morons imaginable.

P.P.S. Most people on this site are anonymous bastards, so I don't give a f@#$ about them. They are worthless trash. Maybe if I knew something about some of the f@#$ers here, I would think differently, but is you act in a way that is not respectable, I will not respect you at all.

P.P.P.S. Watch this video and get help. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cKvUQ3MWsg

I'm sorry you feel this way. I don't think I have interacted with you, and hope that you don't feel I have treated you this way.

Looking at the rest of your post, I don't think you participating in the forum is a positive experience for you. As such, I think you probably would be better off if you did not continue participating here.

This I can believe. I'm not sure if people here will be surprise.

I have read your posts before, I just didn't react  to it. Maybe that's what you should do as well. Never react. There are things that you just have to let slide. Don't chase a validation when clearly, you will be wasting time.  If there is clearly a tension and people are not going to be responsive to you, just take the hint and Have a self respect. Walk away like a proud man. I give that to you.

There are alot of nice people in the real world, why look here?

Sorry to ask, what do you expect an online bitcoin forum to do to the universities that promoted violence against you? Do we actually care about your university here? Are there no Human rights agencies in your country?


It's because you believe you are correct and everyone else is wrong.

 Is this why universities are promoting violence against you?

The best way to avoid being pissed off is to avoid having conversations with people.
There's a life outside the forum, you may enjoy it better.

Please accept the apology that we exist.

We are so lucky that you showed up here and showed us good conversational manners. I don't think we can ever thank you enough.
You are an obvious example that a Ph.D. can make an idiot out of a person

I have heard this stupid ass argument countless times, and it is absolutely idiotic. THIS IS LAZY THINKING! YOU HAVE DONE NO ANALYSIS ON THE COSTS OR BENEFITS OF SOLVING AN IMPORTANT SCIENTIFIC PROBLEM BECAUSE YOU HAVE NOT THOUGHT ABOUT IT AT ALL! FURTHERMORE, THIS ARGUMENT JUST SAYS THAT YOU WILL NEVER DO ANY COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS FOR ANYTHING BECAUSE YOU ARE A STUPID ASS BRAINDEAD F@#$ING MORON! F@#$ YOU!

I am fine. But universities still need to apologize. And because they have not, universities are making all the chlurmcklets who have attended those miserable institutions look like a bunch of stupid ass insufferable morons. THERE IS NO EXCUSE! And until universities apologize for being unprofessional, I will hate all the fuckers who think that these institutions have any legitimacy whatsoever. And since most people go to fucking universities after high school, I have no choice but to hate as many people as I possibly can. People go to college not to learn but to act like stupid f@#$ing morons.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

The absolute narcissism in that statement is hilarious. People that say something like this are usually projecting, and based on the OP's post history, I won't be surprised if it is true.

like what DireWolfM14 said, have you considered that you might be the problem?

If you don't like it when I say that you are psychotic and evil, you should try being less psychotic and evil. I am making a rational assessment based on how the people on this site respond. I am not being narcissistic. You and everyone else here are just stupid.

I am not the problem because I understand that Bitcoin does not even have a mining algorithm that is designed to advance science and nobody else understand this because this site is full of morons. Meanwhile fuckers like you see no problem with pregnant women being on psychiatric medications.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

Well, you can always redesign bitcoin yourself and fork it for whatever purpose you choose.  Or, you can create your own blockchain to ADVANCE SCIENCE, whatever the fuck that means.


That's literally been my job for the last 30 years.  And I'm not talking about the theoretical mental masturbation that earned you your PhD, I'm talking about designing shit that functions in the real world and keeps people alive.

---

In short, quit bitching about bitcoin not being to your liking and create something that is.  You're a genius, remember?  Or, just shut the fuck up, because no one likes to be called names and hollered at by an escapee from the loony bin.

Yeah. You sound like a fucking moron. Maybe I did create something better but the hard part is convincing people not to waste as much energy as possible. Bitcoiners are all a bunch of stupid morons. You are mentally retarded and a fucking asshole too. You hate education because you are fucking stupid.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

Yet you are here that makes you a hypocrite. Thanks to people like you with fake Ph. D.

You are here calling my Ph.D. fake because you are too stupid to know the difference. Fuck you. You deserve to have your hideous breasts removed.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

I was not expecting any better than this from a Fake Ph. D.

That's exactly a slam dog barks Mr Fake Ph. D. You better admin in an elementary school.

You cannot even communicate in complete sentences because you are mentally retarded. Fuck you. Your breasts are stupid.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

Encouraging someone to harm themselves is crossing a line.   I suggest a ban.

AND YOU ALL FUCKING SUPPORT VIOLENCE AGAINST ME WHEN I STAND UP FOR MY OWN SAFETY! I HAVE BEEN CALLING OUT UNIVERSITIES FOR PROMOTING VIOLENCE AGAINST ME, AND YOU ALL SIDE WITH THE UNIVERSITIES BECAUSE YOU ARE ALL BLOODTHIRSTY! YOU HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO PROBLEM WITH VIOLENCE, BUT WHEN I SUGGEST THAT SOMEONE HAS A SURGICAL PROCEDURE FOR OUR SAFETY, YOU GET ALL ANGRY AND HOSTILE! YOU HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO PROBLEM WITH VIOLENCE AGAINST ME BECAUSE YOU ARE ALL BLOODTHIRSTY EVIL BITCHES! BITCOINGIRL HAS BEEN HARASSING ME FOR THE LONGEST TIME AND QUESTIONING MY EDUCATION BECAUSE THAT ENTITY IS A STUPID FUCKING MORON WHO HATES EDUCATION!

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

Me me me. Looks like you are a pathetic creature, no one likes you even in your real life too which made you to seek social approvals. Isn't it your problem and you need to change yourself to fix your character Mr. Fake Ph. D?

Fuck you. You have absolutely nothing to contribute, so you must hate people for having an education. You are absolute trash. Your breasts are rotten. And your face is ugly and smelly too.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

Well OP, let's say I fully agree with you about your assertion regarding every other member of the forum except you.  Let's say that I didn't find it overtly psychotic in a you're-the-goddamn-center-of-the-universe sort of way.

Why are you still here?  The internet is an enormous forest with many strange and interesting birds that you could play with instead of the horrible ones here.  It makes no sense for you to keep raging against this place when it doesn't do you any good and obviously doesn't garner you any support from the community.  Surely a highly educated individual would see the logic in that, no?

When someone keeps saying everyone is the problem, it shows that he is really the main cause of the challenge. OP wants people to disconnect from reality just like him. And he becomes frustrated when members try to redirect him to the right part. I don't blame him for his misbehaviours because he is not in the same world as all of us. It could be very frustrating to force sane people to believe unorganised thoughts.

He might have been banned from many forums because of his behaviour. He is just lucky to be in a forum that promotes free speech.   

whats ur problem joseph? ur post is all over the place. u'r whinin bout ppl not bein nice 2 u, but u'r 1 who's bein all aggressive n insulting.

univs promotin violence? thats just crazy talk. u'r mad cuz ppl dont agre w/ u. n that letter from univ, it dont mean nothin.

psychoactive meds? maybe u shud take sum n calm down, cuz u'r gettin all worked up ovr nothin.

-Hoseph Bike Nameless Ph. D. (Permanenthead Damage)

When OP says "BITCOIN DOES NOT EVEN HAVE A MINING ALGORITHM THAT IS DESIGNED TO ADVANCE SCIENCE", I think what they mean is that they think it's a pity that the definition of Bitcoin's PoW scheme missed an opportunity to embed a niche computer engineering problem. They're saying that if the PoW scheme had been defined in just the right way, then it would have effectively caused any advancements in Bitcoin mining to also have been advancements in reversible computing (https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-future-of-computing-depends-on-making-it-reversible). (OP even attempted such a thing here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5292018).)

I've gotta say, when I carefully read through OP's old posts, I get kind of emotional...

One of the (unrelated-seeming, but, bear with me) stories from recent memory that affected me most (as in, even now, ~7 years later, I get a lump in my throat just thinking about it) is the story of Terry A. Davis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_A._Davis):

https://talkimg.com/images/2025/08/16/USbmSI.jpeg

That dude was a programming legend. In fact, I don't think I've ever crossed paths with someone that I'm fully convinced can even understand just how talented he was (I mean, programmers, as a rule, tend to all think that they're something special, but, when measured on a scale that tops out with what Terry managed to pull off on his own, it's like he's turning out perfectly-set chocolate soufflés while most everyone else is stuck trying to microwave their turds, or something). Solo-programming complicated things (like, for example, a software-rasterized 3D engine) using only dependencies/libraries that you wrote yourself, to run on an operating system that you wrote yourself, all using a compiler that you wrote yourself for a C-like programming language that you designed yourself, is a feat that puts him in a group so small that anyone that figures they belong in that same group is almost certainly mistaken and very probably thinks that getting something like a homebrew Forth or Lisp environment to run on bare metal and then host a small VGA game is just about the size of it (it isn't).

The thing is, you'd never be able to see or say that about him if you graded what he did at face value. His work (TempleOS, I mean) was very difficult to take seriously and looked childishly stupid in many ways. What gave it the patina of amateurism was the fact that he had serious mental health issues (starting from around age 27 and eventually leading to him being homeless and then taking his own life at age 48). He came to believe that he was in direct communication with God (who gave him instructions, like never to implement SVGA, and to stick to a 16-color 640x480 video mode), and when he wasn't programming what he believed to be the Third Temple prophesied in the Bible, he was having manic episodes that would leave him in situations like having driven hundreds of miles to escape capture by the CIA before throwing his keys into the desert and dismantling his vehicle to look for tracking devices. That kind of thing. Toward the end, and for a long time leading up to it, it was impossible to follow WTF he was even talking about most of the time, but, if you engaged him in anything programming-related, he'd be completely lucid.

Anyway, I have no idea what's going on with OP. Maybe he's a troll, or maybe he really is who he says he is. I can't grade his work (I'm not a mathematician), and so I can't say where he might sit on the scale of giftedness. I also can't speak to his seemingly-obvious mental health issues (I'm not a psychiatrist), and so I can't say where he might sit on the scale of craziness. But, I do get some Terry-vibes from his posts (the religious/divine-justice stuff, the phrase-fixation, the repetitive incoherent nonsense, the lucid technical thoughts). With that in mind, my advice to everyone would be to pick between ignoring him or showing him kindness (I mean, that's good advice in general, I think, even though I often fail to apply it myself, and while I know it's difficult to do that when someone is being especially disruptive or saying unhinged things, in my experience, kindness goes a very long way, and there really is no point in trying to argue with someone who cannot perceive that they're playing chess with checkers pieces, so to speak).

And its not like no one ever tried to use a consensus mechanism to "advance science"... Primecoin (https://bitcoinmagazine.com/business/primecoin-the-cryptocurrency-whose-mining-is-actually-useful-1373298534) for instance was quite successful in helping to find new prime numbers for a block reward. And this happened in 2013, before me or Dr. Van Name was interested in the prospects of cryptocurrency.

Another thing I'd like to add to PowerGlove's eloquent statement is that the technical weight or brilliance of a cryptocurrency is not necessarily enough to carry it to success. The value of any money is determined by a social contract between the buyer and seller. If neither both or either of an exchange can agree that a cryptocurrency has any value, then it cannot be used as money. Meaning, there is a social element to crypto that cannot be ignored.