|
Title: Article on Stealth Address and Two Factor Keys Post by: Nicolas Dorier on May 19, 2014, 03:39:51 PM After developping Stealth address support in NBitcoin, I thought that the available documentation on stealth addresses does not have an easy to read, developer oriented explanation of how Stealth address and two factor keys works.
So I decided to write an article about it. Feel free to copy/paste wathever you want for wikis, as long as you bring some credits. ;) Here is the URL : http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/775226/NBitcoin-Cryptography-Part (http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/775226/NBitcoin-Cryptography-Part) Waiting for your feedback :) Title: Re: Article on Stealth Address and Two Factor Keys Post by: genjix on May 20, 2014, 02:07:41 PM thx, really good intro to stealth. I've linked it:
https://wiki.unsystem.net/index.php/DarkWallet/Stealth#Links will be pointing all the noobs there now rather than the dense wiki page. BTW I'm on Freenode IRC #darkwallet Title: Re: Article on Stealth Address and Two Factor Keys Post by: Nicolas Dorier on May 20, 2014, 02:20:46 PM Thanks, don't hesitate to copy text or diagram you find useful in the wiki.
Title: Re: Article on Stealth Address and Two Factor Keys Post by: Peter Todd on May 21, 2014, 09:39:12 AM Really good work, thank you!
re: copying, maybe I missed it, but could you add an explicitly creative commons share-alike license? Title: Re: Article on Stealth Address and Two Factor Keys Post by: Nicolas Dorier on May 21, 2014, 10:12:38 AM Just changed to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ there is also the CC BY ND 3.0, which one is better for us ?
Title: Re: Article on Stealth Address and Two Factor Keys Post by: Nicolas Dorier on May 21, 2014, 10:14:43 AM By the way, if someone need the .vsd (visio) to modify the diagrams, I can send.
Title: Re: Article on Stealth Address and Two Factor Keys Post by: Peter Todd on May 21, 2014, 11:35:30 AM Just changed to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ there is also the CC BY ND 3.0, which one is better for us ? by-sa is perfect, thanks! |