Bitcoin Forum

Alternate cryptocurrencies => Mining (Altcoins) => Topic started by: Wolf0 on May 30, 2014, 10:25:29 PM



Title: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on May 30, 2014, 10:25:29 PM
The other thread was too haphazard and confusing, so I started a new one. I modified CPUMiner-Multi to give 2x the speed or more when mining CryptoNote coins. It is slower on Windows, but still far faster than Lucas' miner.

I ran a test, LucasJones' repo against mine. Each had the exact same CFLAGS (-Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fsplit-ivs-in-unroller -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16). Each were run with 21 threads for a period of time over 20min. I can't be more accurate than that, because I didn't sit and time it. They were run at seperate times on the same machine - a 32 core Amazon EC2 instance with 58GB of RAM. The results? Lucas' cpuminer reported 627.58H/s - but only pulled 600 at the pool. My miner reported 1021.73 and pulled an impressive 1.25KH/s at the pool. Now, even with vardiff causing high share difficulties and luck contributing to inaccuracy, this shows a clear 100% increase. I have screenshots to prove it, but before I post them, I have to warn - I was too lazy to crop out my wallpapers, so they are NSFW.

Lucas' miner (NSFW): https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/lucasminer-proof.png
My miner (NSFW): https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/wolfminer-proof.png

So... get the source here: https://github.com/wolf9466/cpuminer-multi

Win64 binaries exist but require AES-NI. How do you know if you have it? If the binary crashes, you don't. They're here:

https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-05-29-2014.zip
https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-05-29-2014.zip.sig

I made some new ones that should provide an improvement. It's based off some new code I just pushed to my github minutes ago:

https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-05-30-2014.zip
https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-05-30-2014.zip.sig

For the GPG sigs, my key ID and fingerprint is in my signature.

For best performance - play with the number of threads. Often, less is more - there's a reason I used only 21 threads on the 32 core AWS instance in the official test - it resulted in the highest hashrate.
If you see this hosted anywhere else - be wary of it. Check the GPG sig. If you don't know how to, then just know that ottrbutt.com is the ONLY official place to find them, and copies elsewhere may be laced with malware.

Since there has been trouble reproducing my first test, I did another one, this time on a Digital Ocean 16-core. To reduce inaccuracy caused by luck, I used a port the owner of moneropool.com opened for me - it has a share diff of 1000 and no vardiff. The results are roughly the same. These screenshots are NSFW, as well. Why? Well, since hardly anyone ever donates, I may as well get to have some fun for my work :P

https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/lucasminer2.png
https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/wolfminer2.png

NEW -- 06/08/2014
Up to a 25% speedup if you're lucky - but only for Linux. First, do a "sysctl vm.nr_hugepages" - it'll probably say 0. Set it with "sudo sysctl -w vm.nr_hugepages=num" where "num" is the number of threads you're running times three. You may want to play with the threads again to get the best performance. Once set, use "sysctl vm.nr_hugepages" again to make sure it's set. If it's not - reboot and try again, your memory is too fragmented, and the kernel cannot allocate enough contiguous memory for the hugepages. Once done, compile the miner from git as usual and try it out.

Before this, I had maybe 200H/s on my i7-4770K - clocked to 4.5Ghz and underwater. Peak at around 220H/s.
With this new miner: https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/newminer-06082014.png

This will do almost nothing in virtualized environments like AWS.

Another update:
Even faster. Got it consistently above 230H/s on my machine, and it tends to stay above 250H/s: https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/newminer-06082014-2.png
Oh, right. It runs faster as root, since I can use setpriority() and mlock(). However, it doesn't require it.
Tested on my laptop just now - about 140H/s instead of 125H/s from the previous commits: https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/moreoptimizations.png

Third update for today:
More optimized CFLAGS - even faster. Laptop test, for comparison with previous: https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/evenmoreoptimizations.png
You'll need to re-run autogen.sh after pulling this one.

Fourth update!
I got my desktop's i7-4770K above 300H/s. Will test on my laptop in a bit, but: https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/andmoreoptimizations.png
No more per-thread output - it was in the thread function and printing to stdout is slow. Also, I moved a divide out of said function, as they are ouch slow.

NEW -- 06/09/2014
Windows x64 binaries! AES-NI only!

https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-09-2014.zip
https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-09-2014.zip.sig

I did another comparison between my binaries and Lucas'. His seemed to benefit from the flags I use as well - I used the same ones for both. Mine is a lot faster, however, it's less consistent, which is something I'll have to work on.

https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/lucasminer.png
https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/wolfminer.png

06/12/2014
Some Win binaries for those without AES-NI.

https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-12-2014.zip
https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-12-2014.zip.sig

06/17/2014
Pushed another commit - I removed all algorithms but CryptoNight. The files are still there for now, but unused. Compile time is WAY down, code size and binary size, as well. Don't use the -a or --algo switches anymore.

06/18/2014
I rolled back the earlier commit - broke stuff. I tested and pushed a similar one just now, though. The -a switch must still be used for now, but there is no code for other algos, making it a lot slimmer. I also tested it before pushing this time.  :D

06/19/2014
Removed the -a and --algo switches from the help text. It will still accept them, but ignore them for compatibility. No need to use them anymore. I also set the default algorithm to CryptoNight.

06/20/2014
Added a check for AES-NI that is compiled in only if the miner is being built for AES-NI. AES-NI binaries built from this source or newer should output a message telling the user that the CPU does not have AES-NI, rather than crashing.

07/07/2014
Non-AES-NI implementation fixed just now. No binaries yet - but you can compile from github.

07/09/2014
Did a LOT of code cleaning - also remembered to add an optimization flag I'd been meaning to put in for ages. Probably won't do too much, though.

Had a thought a little later - removed that lingering, now-pointless OpenSSL requirement.

Okay, done. Have a Windows x64 binary for non-AES-NI. Does it submit shares? Yes. Does it work on a non-AES-NI system? Beats me.

https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/minerd-wolf-07-09-14.exe
https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/minerd-wolf-07-09-14.exe.sig

No DLLs anymore!

09/03/2014
Just wanted to say that to my surprise, a pool, MONERO.RS, has donated to me for my work on the CPU miner!  :D

If you like it - donate! My addresses are on my GitHub, also below (XMR address needs code tags or BCT screws it up):

XMR:
Code:
42QWoLF7pdwMcTXDviJvNkWEHJ4TXnMBh2Cx6HNkVAW57E48Zfw6wLwDUYFDYJAqY7PLJUTz9cHWB5C4wUA7UJPu5wPf4sZ
BTC: 1WoLFumNUvjCgaCyjFzvFrbGfDddYrKNR


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: QuadraQ on May 30, 2014, 11:46:13 PM
I can confirm there is indeed a speed improvement. Tested on one machine with an Intel i5 2320 running Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit.

Using Lucas build: 76-88 H/s averaging about 79/80
Wolf 5/29 build: 90-99 H/s averaging about 93/94
Wolf 5/30 build: 87-96 H/s averaging about 91/92


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: followtheboss on May 31, 2014, 09:27:03 AM
Hello,
thx for your miner working nice on my i3 4130 on win8 64bit
i go from 65 h/s to 80h/s  it's about +20%

I like it  ;D

cheers


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: restless on May 31, 2014, 10:54:47 AM
Build from 30.05 seems to be as fast as 29-05. Maybe slightly faster. but the diff is small, like 47 per thread to 47.5 on i5-2500


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: aikklond on May 31, 2014, 01:06:19 PM
How can I set thread count?

on A8-5600 it starts 3 threads and I get a total of 42 H/s (approx 14 per thread)


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: tequillaquagga on May 31, 2014, 02:28:04 PM
Who can successfully build on OSX?
I got:
 ./configure: line 5666: syntax error near unexpected token `,'
./configure: line 5666: `LIBCURL_CHECK_CONFIG(, 7.15.2, ,'

when running configure


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: vokain on May 31, 2014, 03:06:37 PM
So I can just type this in terminal and it'll update?

cd ~/ && rm -rf cpuminer && mkdir cpuminer && cd cpuminer && git clone http://github.com/wolf9466/cpuminer-multi.git && pushd cpuminer-multi && cd ~/cpuminer/cpuminer-multi && ./autogen.sh && export CFLAGS="-march=native"  && ./configure && make && unset CLFAGS && popd


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Ed4252 on May 31, 2014, 04:39:56 PM
got a cpuminer solution for 32 bit comp?


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: restless on May 31, 2014, 04:54:50 PM
How can I set thread count?

on A8-5600 it starts 3 threads and I get a total of 42 H/s (approx 14 per thread)
At least for Intel CPUs, running (cores -1) threads gives best speed
Otherwise with -t x, as in most cpu miners


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Kyune on May 31, 2014, 04:55:05 PM
Win64 binaries exist but require AES-NI.
If I compile from source should I be able to run it on a processor without AES-NI then?  I compiled it successfully in an Virtualbox Ubuntu 13.04 virtual machine (on a Win 7 host without AES-NI), but get:

Code:
[2014-05-31 09:46:38] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2014-05-31 09:46:38] 2 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
Illegal instruction (core dumped)

upon starting up the miner.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: fusecavator on May 31, 2014, 05:39:07 PM
Win64 binaries exist but require AES-NI.
If I compile from source should I be able to run it on a processor without AES-NI then?  I compiled it successfully in an Virtualbox Ubuntu 13.04 virtual machine (on a Win 7 host without AES-NI), but get:

Code:
[2014-05-31 09:46:38] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2014-05-31 09:46:38] 2 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
Illegal instruction (core dumped)

upon starting up the miner.

That error is probably indicating that it is still trying to use AES-NI. Code changes might be required.

I'm not getting anywhere near the speed improvement wolf claims, but it is an improvement.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: dewdeded on May 31, 2014, 06:48:04 PM
got a cpuminer solution for 32 bit comp?
CryptoNight the PoW-algo is announced as 64-bit only.

Maybe someone more knowledge than me, will tell you, if this true and gonna stay way (or 32-bit CryptoNight miners are possible with dirty hack or something).


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Remember remember the 5th of November on May 31, 2014, 06:59:48 PM
Is there a reason why you didn't edit out the furry images?


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: MadGhost on May 31, 2014, 07:01:46 PM
Thanks for the miner . I will try it and post my results .


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: vokain on May 31, 2014, 07:02:28 PM
Is there a reason why you didn't edit out the furry images?

'let your freak flag fly'?

i.e. be cool, don't let other people tell you how to live, and do your own thing :)


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Remember remember the 5th of November on May 31, 2014, 07:05:02 PM
Is there a reason why you didn't edit out the furry images?

'let your freak flag fly'?

i.e. be cool, don't let other people tell you how to live, and do your own thing :)
Hey look, if he's trying to imply he is homosexual, I am fine with that, but those images weren't really necessary for the miner screenshots.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: vokain on May 31, 2014, 07:08:58 PM
Is there a reason why you didn't edit out the furry images?

'let your freak flag fly'?

i.e. be cool, don't let other people tell you how to live, and do your own thing :)
Hey look, if he's trying to imply he is homosexual, I am fine with that, but those images weren't really necessary for the miner screenshots.

yeah I do have to agree, nah they weren't necessary

but like you kinda said, I'm fine with self-expression, and I might argue that that is more right than not expressing oneself


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: QuadraQ on May 31, 2014, 09:00:20 PM
I was trying to send a donation for your work, but I guess I need payment ID.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Wolf0 on May 31, 2014, 10:18:39 PM
Win64 binaries exist but require AES-NI.
If I compile from source should I be able to run it on a processor without AES-NI then?  I compiled it successfully in an Virtualbox Ubuntu 13.04 virtual machine (on a Win 7 host without AES-NI), but get:

Code:
[2014-05-31 09:46:38] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2014-05-31 09:46:38] 2 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
Illegal instruction (core dumped)

upon starting up the miner.

Configure with --disable-aes-ni


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Wolf0 on May 31, 2014, 10:19:40 PM
Is there a reason why you didn't edit out the furry images?

I had been up for four days straight reading and writing code - at that point I just didn't care :P


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Wolf0 on May 31, 2014, 11:29:16 PM
I was trying to send a donation for your work, but I guess I need payment ID.

You don't need a payment ID.

When I tried to replicate Wolf's results, I only got about 750 hs on the 32 core instance with his miner.  Any ideas?

Hm... I may redo the test on a Digital Ocean droplet.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Wolf0 on June 01, 2014, 01:05:12 AM
Bump. Results of new test published.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: vokain on June 01, 2014, 01:08:52 AM
Is there a reason why you didn't edit out the furry images?

I had been up for four days straight reading and writing code - at that point I just didn't care :P

grateful for your pioneering work wolfie! my mining pool hashrate reflects my hashrate on a 4770k as much faster. Consistently 200H/s+ instead of often lingering in the 100s


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Wolf0 on June 01, 2014, 01:13:17 AM
Is there a reason why you didn't edit out the furry images?

I had been up for four days straight reading and writing code - at that point I just didn't care :P

grateful for your pioneering work wolfie! my mining pool hashrate reflects my hashrate on a 4770k as much faster. Consistently 200H/s+ instead of often lingering in the 100s

No problem. New test posted, as well.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Kyune on June 01, 2014, 05:19:15 AM
Win64 binaries exist but require AES-NI.
If I compile from source should I be able to run it on a processor without AES-NI then?  I compiled it successfully in an Virtualbox Ubuntu 13.04 virtual machine (on a Win 7 host without AES-NI), but get:

Code:
[2014-05-31 09:46:38] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2014-05-31 09:46:38] 2 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
Illegal instruction (core dumped)

upon starting up the miner.

Configure with --disable-aes-ni

Thank you.  That worked. 

Without AES-NI available to me on this machine, I get a slower hash rate with your miner compared to the Lucas Jones miner.  I'm sure this comes as no surprise, since you have been optimizing for AES-NI.  Inside my virtual machine, per core, I get about 11 H/s with yours, and about 18.5 H/s with Lucas Jones.



Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Wolf0 on June 01, 2014, 05:30:57 AM
Win64 binaries exist but require AES-NI.
If I compile from source should I be able to run it on a processor without AES-NI then?  I compiled it successfully in an Virtualbox Ubuntu 13.04 virtual machine (on a Win 7 host without AES-NI), but get:

Code:
[2014-05-31 09:46:38] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2014-05-31 09:46:38] 2 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
Illegal instruction (core dumped)

upon starting up the miner.

Configure with --disable-aes-ni

Thank you.  That worked. 

Without AES-NI available to me on this machine, I get a slower hash rate with your miner compared to the Lucas Jones miner.  I'm sure this comes as no surprise, since you have been optimizing for AES-NI.  Inside my virtual machine, per core, I get about 11 H/s with yours, and about 18.5 H/s with Lucas Jones.


I did do some work on the non-AES-NI implementation recently. Try running it natively.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: vokain on June 01, 2014, 05:53:01 AM
I still don't quite understand why running 3 or 7 threads on a 4 core, 8 thread CPU results in more hashes than running 1,2,4,5,6, or 8 threads


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Wolf0 on June 01, 2014, 06:07:36 AM
I still don't quite understand why running 3 or 7 threads on a 4 core, 8 thread CPU results in more hashes than running 1,2,4,5,6, or 8 threads

All the cores aren't real. Often, by using more than 4 threads on a 4 core, 8 thread CPU, you're overloading it, therefore it runs slower. Three threads allows one thread for the output - it also lets the CPU schedule the threads, because if the thread number is a multiple of the core count, the code binds threads to cores, which is a bad idea according to my testing.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: QuadraQ on June 01, 2014, 09:47:17 AM
I was trying to send a donation for your work, but I guess I need payment ID.

You don't need a payment ID.


The .NET Windows GUI Wallet I'm using for Monero begs to differ. It won't let me send anything without a payment ID. Probably a bug in the GUI.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Wolf0 on June 01, 2014, 09:50:20 AM
I was trying to send a donation for your work, but I guess I need payment ID.

You don't need a payment ID.


The .NET Windows GUI Wallet I'm using for Monero begs to differ. It won't let me send anything without a payment ID. Probably a bug in the GUI.

Then use any payment ID. As long as it's the right length and all hex digits, it should accept it. Try this:

5a6f13d8a3e90f0694c20ee9900a23bfe8c0008e7ec0deadbeefcafebaadf00d


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Captain-Karacho on June 01, 2014, 09:50:47 AM
I can confirm +20% with my FX 4300 and +30% with my I7 2600k.

Thanks a lot Wolf0, good job!  :)


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Wolf0 on June 01, 2014, 09:53:02 AM
I can confirm +20% with my FX 4300 and +30% with my I7 2600k.

Thanks a lot Wolf0, good job!  :)

Windows, I assume. Try Linux (not in a VM) - should be loads better.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: rommie7 on June 01, 2014, 05:47:45 PM
Thanks for the awesome work.
I'm trying to donate a couple of MRO but i'm getting "Invalid Send Address" when using the address in the first post and the payment id.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: phzi on June 01, 2014, 06:16:54 PM
Great performance running 3 threads on an i7 2600. Pulling ~180H/s.  More threads hurts performance, so less threads definitely does seem like more here.

2 threads has the same performance as 8 threads, and 3 threads definitely pushes the most hashrate.  Interestingly, 3 threads uses only 40% CPU... must be hitting some cache limits or something.

(Windows rig this one - most of my machines run linux, but have Core2Duos without AES-NI).


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: drmavis on June 01, 2014, 06:35:07 PM
Hi,

Really great work on this. Would it be possible for you to add another crypto algorithm? I would love it if DCrypt could be added for Slimcoin mining. There is a fork of cpuminer called slimminer (that I can't get to compile on Windows) and it would be amazing if it could get integrated in this optimized cpuminer-multi. Will definitely donate.

Mike


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: hero18688 on June 01, 2014, 10:35:35 PM
Is Boolberry (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577267.msg7078612#msg7078612) supported?
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #Lw7H68vv8KEGiNiH


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: deadmanwalking on June 02, 2014, 04:03:51 AM
Is there a reason why you didn't edit out the furry images?

I had been up for four days straight reading and writing code - at that point I just didn't care :P

grateful for your pioneering work wolfie! my mining pool hashrate reflects my hashrate on a 4770k as much faster. Consistently 200H/s+ instead of often lingering in the 100s

How much does 200H\s net you in a day? Thanks


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: vokain on June 02, 2014, 06:08:33 AM
Is there a reason why you didn't edit out the furry images?

I had been up for four days straight reading and writing code - at that point I just didn't care :P

grateful for your pioneering work wolfie! my mining pool hashrate reflects my hashrate on a 4770k as much faster. Consistently 200H/s+ instead of often lingering in the 100s

How much does 200H\s net you in a day? Thanks

maybe a monero if I'm lucky


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Wolf0 on June 02, 2014, 07:04:28 AM
Is Boolberry (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577267.msg7078612#msg7078612) supported?
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #Lw7H68vv8KEGiNiH

Boolberry uses a different algorithm, so no.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: obobob on June 02, 2014, 08:30:24 AM
I'm using GCC 4.7.2 and LD 2.23 compiled.
when I make , I got a error:
gcc: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration

who can help me ?
thanks.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Wolf0 on June 02, 2014, 08:34:30 AM
I'm using GCC 4.7.2 and LD 2.23 compiled.
when I make , I got a error:
gcc: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration

who can help me ?
thanks.


Update your toolchain would be my guess.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: obobob on June 02, 2014, 08:41:57 AM
Recommends upgrading to ?


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Wolf0 on June 02, 2014, 08:49:00 AM
Recommends upgrading to ?

4.9.0 I know works. May as well stick to the latest.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: obobob on June 02, 2014, 09:45:53 AM
many thanks!


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: cryptos on June 02, 2014, 09:50:33 AM
How do you control number of threads or optimize this, has made my pc unusable

minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://mine.moneropool.com:3333 -p x -u [YourMoneroAddress]

I just followed above.

EDIT found it... --help hahah


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Ed4252 on June 03, 2014, 02:14:33 AM
so are there any 32 bit options??


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Wolf0 on June 03, 2014, 04:25:13 AM
so are there any 32 bit options??

No. I mean, I could do it, but... there's no point. You'd be mining so slowly you'd be losing coins :P


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: ajiekceu4 on June 03, 2014, 06:48:34 AM
so are there any 32 bit options??

No. I mean, I could do it, but... there's no point. You'd be mining so slowly you'd be losing coins :P

On my work i have 400+ pc with 32 bit windows 7. I can mine on all this machine with low priority and free electricity 24\7 ;). So 32 bit version would be great for me. I can donate 0.2 BTC for this.
Sorry for my English.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: tersagun on June 03, 2014, 11:17:19 AM
I still keep getting the same error on this version (I had this on prior cpuminer versions as well)

After a random while (5 minutes, 2 hours), I start getting the following error and it doesn't fix unless I restart the minerd. What could be the cause?
I'm mining at Minergate BTW.


[2014-06-03 14:09:17] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 146.87 H/s at diff 444 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-03 14:09:21] thread 3: 119 hashes, 17.18 H/s
[2014-06-03 14:09:23] json_rpc2.0 error: Slightly stale share
[2014-06-03 14:09:23] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2014-06-03 14:09:23] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2014-06-03 14:09:24] thread 2: 222 hashes, 16.28 H/s
[2014-06-03 14:09:25] thread 0: 80 hashes, 12.42 H/s
[2014-06-03 14:09:27] thread 1: 154 hashes, 20.35 H/s
[2014-06-03 14:09:34] json_rpc2.0 error: Unknown job id
[2014-06-03 14:09:34] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2014-06-03 14:09:34] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2014-06-03 14:09:46] json_rpc2.0 error: Unknown job id
[2014-06-03 14:09:46] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: ajeef on June 03, 2014, 11:31:18 AM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BpM7prWCAAAPrIf.jpg:large
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BpM7pQrCcAEgPZC.jpg:large
4 threads easy get shares


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: vokain on June 03, 2014, 12:09:01 PM

what's your cpu?


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: tersagun on June 03, 2014, 12:59:22 PM
BTW I do not think the hashrate represents "real value", at least on my i5.

My hashrate on the minerd goes between 80-220 h/s. Minergate shows 50 hash/s on average
A 20% more powerful PC using 4 simpleminers result in 100 h/s on Minergate.

He found 124 shares where I've found a whopping 57. More then double the gain using simpleminer. how can I trust the hashrate shown in the minerd?


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: beavis4ever on June 03, 2014, 02:26:56 PM
BTW I do not think the hashrate represents "real value", at least on my i5.

My hashrate on the minerd goes between 80-220 h/s. Minergate shows 50 hash/s on average
A 20% more powerful PC using 4 simpleminers result in 100 h/s on Minergate.

He found 124 shares where I've found a whopping 57. More then double the gain using simpleminer. how can I trust the hashrate shown in the minerd?

The shares are most likely being submitted at a higher difficulty, which should have more value to the pool.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: tomewok on June 03, 2014, 04:26:48 PM
Hi, i don't know why but i can't get more than 100 hash/s on my i5-4670k clocked at 4.4Ghz and if i go with stock clock i can't get more than 80 hash/s :/


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: greatwolf on June 03, 2014, 08:35:14 PM
This crashes on my intel Q6600 4 core processor.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Wolf0 on June 03, 2014, 08:39:10 PM
Hi, i don't know why but i can't get more than 100 hash/s on my i5-4670k clocked at 4.4Ghz and if i go with stock clock i can't get more than 80 hash/s :/

If you're using Windows, try Linux. Natively, not in a VM. Seriously, it helps.

This crashes on my intel Q6600 4 core processor.

Please read the OP next time.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: greatwolf on June 03, 2014, 09:06:05 PM
Win64 binaries exist but require AES-NI. How do you know if you have it? If the binary crashes, you don't.
...

Were you referring to that? Did you mean for that to be interpreted as "only a Win64 AES-NI binary is available" because when I first read it, it sounded like there was a non AES-NI build available somewhere. And you also mentioned some optimizations done to the legacy part as well so I'm a bit confused.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Wolf0 on June 03, 2014, 09:07:51 PM
Win64 binaries exist but require AES-NI. How do you know if you have it? If the binary crashes, you don't.
...

Were you referring to that? Did you mean for that to be interpreted as "only a Win64 AES-NI binary is available" because when I first read it, it sounded like there was a non AES-NI build available somewhere. And you also mentioned some optimizations done to the legacy part as well so I'm a bit confused.

There are no non-AES-NI builds available, but it is possible to build for non-AES-NI. Sorry if that was misleading.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: tersagun on June 03, 2014, 09:58:37 PM
BTW I do not think the hashrate represents "real value", at least on my i5.

My hashrate on the minerd goes between 80-220 h/s. Minergate shows 50 hash/s on average
A 20% more powerful PC using 4 simpleminers result in 100 h/s on Minergate.

He found 124 shares where I've found a whopping 57. More then double the gain using simpleminer. how can I trust the hashrate shown in the minerd?

The shares are most likely being submitted at a higher difficulty, which should have more value to the pool.

Hey mate,

are you sure this is how it works on Minergate? Did not really check that but if I'm not mistaken, the difficulty is set to 444 on Minergate.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Wolf0 on June 03, 2014, 10:04:53 PM
BTW I do not think the hashrate represents "real value", at least on my i5.

My hashrate on the minerd goes between 80-220 h/s. Minergate shows 50 hash/s on average
A 20% more powerful PC using 4 simpleminers result in 100 h/s on Minergate.

He found 124 shares where I've found a whopping 57. More then double the gain using simpleminer. how can I trust the hashrate shown in the minerd?

The shares are most likely being submitted at a higher difficulty, which should have more value to the pool.

Hey mate,

are you sure this is how it works on Minergate? Did not really check that but if I'm not mistaken, the difficulty is set to 444 on Minergate.

The hashrate represents something near the real value on every other pool. If only Minergate is different, that would indicate something is wrong with them, not the miner.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: tersagun on June 03, 2014, 10:13:26 PM
BTW I do not think the hashrate represents "real value", at least on my i5.

My hashrate on the minerd goes between 80-220 h/s. Minergate shows 50 hash/s on average
A 20% more powerful PC using 4 simpleminers result in 100 h/s on Minergate.

He found 124 shares where I've found a whopping 57. More then double the gain using simpleminer. how can I trust the hashrate shown in the minerd?

The shares are most likely being submitted at a higher difficulty, which should have more value to the pool.

Hey mate,

are you sure this is how it works on Minergate? Did not really check that but if I'm not mistaken, the difficulty is set to 444 on Minergate.

The hashrate represents something near the real value on every other pool. If only Minergate is different, that would indicate something is wrong with them, not the miner.

Thanks for the reply Wolf. I'll make some more tests tomorrow to compare actual mined coins on different scenarios.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: ajeef on June 03, 2014, 11:29:38 PM
e3 1230


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: tequillaquagga on June 04, 2014, 10:26:04 AM
OSX 10.9.3
brew install automake autoconf curl
then git clone repo, run autogen, run no macro.pl
When exec ./configure, I got error:

./configure: line 5666: syntax error near unexpected token `,'
./configure: line 5666: `LIBCURL_CHECK_CONFIG(, 7.15.2, ,'

I have fresh install of OSX. What wrong?

Thanks.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Lepra on June 04, 2014, 12:23:19 PM
Work fine for me:

http://i.imgur.com/qz8TNyK.jpg
CPU - FX8350 - t7


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: yudhistre on June 05, 2014, 02:00:48 AM
Hello,

Can someone build a version for Non-AES-NI please. All my PCs don't have AES-NI

Thanks


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: kingscrown on June 05, 2014, 02:07:13 AM
good job man!


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Quicken on June 05, 2014, 12:59:48 PM
Windows, I assume. Try Linux (not in a VM) - should be loads better.

Hi Wolf0. Can you explain why linux is quicker than Windows for this task? I'm running on Windows, and this PC isn't just for mining so I can't easily switch.
Thanks, Q


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Wolf0 on June 05, 2014, 05:23:17 PM
Windows, I assume. Try Linux (not in a VM) - should be loads better.

Hi Wolf0. Can you explain why linux is quicker than Windows for this task? I'm running on Windows, and this PC isn't just for mining so I can't easily switch.
Thanks, Q

Windows doesn't give me as much control over memory management.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: ROBERTO on June 05, 2014, 06:19:46 PM
Hello,

I have this on my openssl engine

jimmy1@localhost:~$ openssl engine
(rsax) RSAX engine support
(dynamic) Dynamic engine loading support


How to add aesni to openssl engine????

Please

Thanks


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Wolf0 on June 05, 2014, 06:24:22 PM
Hello,

I have this on my openssl engine

jimmy1@localhost:~$ openssl engine
(rsax) RSAX engine support
(dynamic) Dynamic engine loading support


How to add aesni to openssl engine????

Please

Thanks

You don't need to. OpenSSL isn't used for cryptonight at all - it's all custom code.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: ROBERTO on June 05, 2014, 06:59:55 PM
Thanks for your reply wolf0

Another question, how to configure on ubuntu with AES-NI disable to see if i have more H/s

Thanks


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: GreekBitcoin on June 05, 2014, 07:16:25 PM
Thanks for your reply wolf0

Another question, how to configure on ubuntu with AES-NI disable to see if i have more H/s

Thanks

Configure with --disable-aes-ni


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: relm9 on June 06, 2014, 12:29:28 AM
I'm using GCC 4.7.2 and LD 2.23 compiled.
when I make , I got a error:
gcc: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration

who can help me ?
thanks.


Had the same issue with GCC 4.8.2. I removed -fuse-linker-plugin from the Makefile and it compiled without issue, works fine too. Not sure if this impacts any optimizations, but speed seems good, 420 H/s on dual  E5-2620 with -t 12.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Wolf0 on June 06, 2014, 12:40:49 AM
I'm using GCC 4.7.2 and LD 2.23 compiled.
when I make , I got a error:
gcc: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration

who can help me ?
thanks.


Had the same issue with GCC 4.8.2. I removed -fuse-linker-plugin from the Makefile and it compiled without issue, works fine too. Not sure if this impacts any optimizations, but speed seems good, 420 H/s on dual  E5-2620 with -t 12.

It's not your GCC version - update your binutils. You may get a better hashrate with it.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: restless on June 06, 2014, 11:52:55 AM
Do you have plans to add merged mining (for FCN) ?


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Wolf0 on June 06, 2014, 05:56:36 PM
Do you have plans to add merged mining (for FCN) ?

I could improve the FCN daemon if that's what you're asking... but really, this is a lot of work, and rarely does anyone donate. I'll think about it.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Syzygy123 on June 06, 2014, 08:56:19 PM
Do you know what cpu models you were using with the amazon instance? I'm wondering if there is any more tweaking I can do with dual e5 2680s. I'm currently getting about 750 hash/s using 16 threads (tried the 21 threads that you used).


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Wolf0 on June 06, 2014, 09:08:59 PM
Do you know what cpu models you were using with the amazon instance? I'm wondering if there is any more tweaking I can do with dual e5 2680s. I'm currently getting about 750 hash/s using 16 threads (tried the 21 threads that you used).
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: relm9 on June 07, 2014, 01:24:05 AM
I'm using GCC 4.7.2 and LD 2.23 compiled.
when I make , I got a error:
gcc: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration

who can help me ?
thanks.


Had the same issue with GCC 4.8.2. I removed -fuse-linker-plugin from the Makefile and it compiled without issue, works fine too. Not sure if this impacts any optimizations, but speed seems good, 420 H/s on dual  E5-2620 with -t 12.

It's not your GCC version - update your binutils. You may get a better hashrate with it.

Worked - thanks! :) Slight speedup - +~10 H/s


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Wolf0 on June 07, 2014, 01:33:28 AM
I'm using GCC 4.7.2 and LD 2.23 compiled.
when I make , I got a error:
gcc: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration

who can help me ?
thanks.


Had the same issue with GCC 4.8.2. I removed -fuse-linker-plugin from the Makefile and it compiled without issue, works fine too. Not sure if this impacts any optimizations, but speed seems good, 420 H/s on dual  E5-2620 with -t 12.

It's not your GCC version - update your binutils. You may get a better hashrate with it.

Worked - thanks! :) Slight speedup - +~10 H/s

Well, I did include those flags for a reason  :D


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: ozzy1926 on June 07, 2014, 06:03:01 AM
whats the .bat settings for 4770k @win7x64


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: coinfusion on June 07, 2014, 07:44:54 AM
Seems like everything after the may 28th commit doesn't work right for non-aesNI. Hashes are happening, but nothing is ever submitted to the pool.  Gotta get more information but sleepy time now!


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Wolf0 on June 07, 2014, 03:00:08 PM
Do you have plans to add merged mining (for FCN) ?

How much would it be worth if I got it almost as fast as my cpuminer?


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: best2002 on June 07, 2014, 09:17:21 PM
AMD1055T won't run, you can solve? please .


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Wolf0 on June 07, 2014, 09:26:45 PM
AMD1055T won't run, you can solve? please .


No. Doesn't have AES-NI.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: degel_x on June 08, 2014, 08:40:29 AM
Hi
 i need a some help here, i manage to compile, but when i run ./minerd i got this
Code:
./minerd: error while loading shared libraries: libcrypto.so.1.0.0: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
but i have openssl installed and this archives at /usr/lib and /usr/lib64
Code:
libcrypto.so         libcrypto.so.10      libcrypto.so.1.0.1e

My enviroment is centos 6.4

Tnks

edit: I copied my  libcrypto.so.1.0.0 from /usr/local/lib to /usr/lib64 and it works now  :)


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: Wolf0 on June 08, 2014, 08:59:05 AM
Hi
 i need a some help here, i manage to compile, but when i run ./minerd i got this
Code:
./minerd: error while loading shared libraries: libcrypto.so.1.0.0: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
but i have openssl installed and this archives at /usr/lib and /usr/lib64
Code:
libcrypto.so         libcrypto.so.10      libcrypto.so.1.0.1e

My enviroment is centos 6.4

Tnks

Wait... so you compiled against libcrypto.so.1.0.0, but when you ran it, you had only libcrypto.so.1.0.1e?  ???

You must have upgraded OpenSSL in the middle. Rebuild the miner.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: degel_x on June 08, 2014, 09:10:47 AM
Hi
 i need a some help here, i manage to compile, but when i run ./minerd i got this
Code:
./minerd: error while loading shared libraries: libcrypto.so.1.0.0: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
but i have openssl installed and this archives at /usr/lib and /usr/lib64
Code:
libcrypto.so         libcrypto.so.10      libcrypto.so.1.0.1e

My enviroment is centos 6.4

Tnks

Wait... so you compiled against libcrypto.so.1.0.0, but when you ran it, you had only libcrypto.so.1.0.1e?  ???

You must have upgraded OpenSSL in the middle. Rebuild the miner.

I think my enviroment is a mess, i just copied my  libcrypto.so.1.0.0 from /usr/local/lib to /usr/lib64 and it works now

Anyway thanks a lot


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 08, 2014, 02:50:05 PM
Bump for update.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: surfer43 on June 08, 2014, 03:28:14 PM
Keep up the good work.  8)


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: antonio8 on June 08, 2014, 04:09:53 PM
Bump for update.

Are you making a compiled version for windows? I don't see it in the post.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 08, 2014, 04:14:39 PM
Bump for update.

Are you making a compiled version for windows? I don't see it in the post.

No need. Windows doesn't give me such control over memory management - so this optimization can't be done for Windows.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 08, 2014, 04:20:23 PM
Oh, and by the way - this affects non-AES-NI, too. So now my implementation of non-AES-NI is a bit faster than Lucas'.  :)


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: GreekBitcoin on June 08, 2014, 06:17:37 PM
Excellent optimization Wolf! I got like 15% more than lucas miner on my non AES-NI VMs :D


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: vgo on June 08, 2014, 06:40:56 PM
Thanks, t-8  350 H/s - w7 64bits.

http://i58.tinypic.com/2n00bw4.jpg


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 08, 2014, 07:44:47 PM
Working on more optimizations, but dammit, it won't stay stable: https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/newminer2.png


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: 5w00p on June 08, 2014, 10:33:34 PM
seriously, those nasty female pussyskunk drawings are fakkin weird.

but good work on the miner.  thx


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 08, 2014, 10:39:43 PM
Bump for another update!


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 08, 2014, 11:28:35 PM
Bump for another update!

Want to see something weird?

0.00 Khash/s.
http://i.imgur.com/S5QuZgh.jpg

Whoa. Never seen that before. Restart it?


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 08, 2014, 11:33:27 PM
Whoa. Never seen that before. Restart it?

Same thing.

Weird ain't it? lol.

Very...


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 08, 2014, 11:39:00 PM
Whoa. Never seen that before. Restart it?

Same thing.

Weird ain't it? lol.

Very...

I3-2100 CPU

mining multicoins at maniac scrypt. I also tried mining at litecoinpool.org. same thing.

Waaaait - you're using it for scrypt, not cryptonight? There's no reason to do that - and I may blatantly break other algos to optimize CryptoNight.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 09, 2014, 12:13:52 AM
Waaaait - you're using it for scrypt, not cryptonight? There's no reason to do that - and I may blatantly break other algos to optimize CryptoNight.

mk. thought it was for scrypt. sorries.

Any guides towards this cryptonight I never heard of?

It's for XMR: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: onemorebtc on June 09, 2014, 12:55:42 AM
Thanks! Working great.
btw i noticed that i get around 20h/8cores more when using gcc 4.7 instead of 4.6


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 09, 2014, 12:58:02 AM
Thanks! Working great.
btw i noticed that i get around 20h/8cores more when using gcc 4.7 instead of 4.6

I use 4.9.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: djm34 on June 09, 2014, 01:26:58 AM
Is there a link to the windows binaries of this new and faster version ?
I didn't find any thing in the OP


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 09, 2014, 01:27:23 AM
Is there a link to the windows binaries of this new and faster version ?
I didn't find any thing in the OP

No Win binaries exist yet.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: coinfusion on June 09, 2014, 03:02:46 AM
I've been making windows binaries, but it seems that everything after the may 28th commit hashes but never submits work with my non-aesNI machine.  Could someone verify that the most recent version still works with --disable-aes-ni  at least on linux?


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Agamemnus on June 09, 2014, 06:14:49 AM
I'd give all kinds of naughty favours for win64 binaries. With AES preferred for i7-4930k ;) ;) *nudge* *nudge*


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 09, 2014, 08:48:45 AM
I've been making windows binaries, but it seems that everything after the may 28th commit hashes but never submits work with my non-aesNI machine.  Could someone verify that the most recent version still works with --disable-aes-ni  at least on linux?

Works for me.

I'd give all kinds of naughty favours for win64 binaries. With AES preferred for i7-4930k ;) ;) *nudge* *nudge*

I'll compile them soon.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: restless on June 09, 2014, 09:29:22 AM
Compiled under OpenSuse13. Its running as the only guest on ESX5 machine, 12 core Xeon 5670
Previous version is making 440-450H/s, this newer version makes 390-410H/s
vm variable was set to 36 (12*3) - sudo sysctl -w vm.nr_hugepages=36


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: polecrab on June 09, 2014, 10:15:03 AM
I can't get stratum to work from Windows regardless of what mining software I use. On the same internet connection it works fine for Linux.

On Windows using the command format:

minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://mine.moneropool.org:80 -u YourMoneroAddress -p x -t 4

I get this error:

[2014-06-09 20:09:15] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2014-06-09 20:09:15] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://mine.moneropool.org:80
[2014-06-09 20:09:15] 4 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
[2014-06-09 20:09:15] Stratum connection failed: Received HTTP code 403 from proxy after CONNECT
[2014-06-09 20:09:15] ...retry after 10 seconds
^C

I suspect it is something to do with Norton Internet Security but I have tried disabling all the options in NIS I can think of.  Has anyone else solved this?
Up until now I have been using stratum proxies for other coins, but I can't find one for Monero.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 09, 2014, 11:06:13 AM
Compiled under OpenSuse13. Its running as the only guest on ESX5 machine, 12 core Xeon 5670
Previous version is making 440-450H/s, this newer version makes 390-410H/s
vm variable was set to 36 (12*3) - sudo sysctl -w vm.nr_hugepages=36


If it's running under a VM, you'll not see much improvement. Also, try playing with the number of threads - I had to reduce mine. If all else fails, try reverting commits one by one. If I get enough people saying a commit is bad, I'll revert it on github.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: restless on June 09, 2014, 11:37:50 AM
I can't get stratum to work from Windows regardless of what mining software I use. On the same internet connection it works fine for Linux.

On Windows using the command format:

minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://mine.moneropool.org:80 -u YourMoneroAddress -p x -t 4

I get this error:

[2014-06-09 20:09:15] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2014-06-09 20:09:15] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://mine.moneropool.org:80
[2014-06-09 20:09:15] 4 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
[2014-06-09 20:09:15] Stratum connection failed: Received HTTP code 403 from proxy after CONNECT
[2014-06-09 20:09:15] ...retry after 10 seconds
^C

I suspect it is something to do with Norton Internet Security but I have tried disabling all the options in NIS I can think of.  Has anyone else solved this?
Up until now I have been using stratum proxies for other coins, but I can't find one for Monero.
Try moneropool.com?

2 w0lf. by "reverting commits" do you mean decreasing number of hugepages?


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 09, 2014, 11:40:48 AM
I can't get stratum to work from Windows regardless of what mining software I use. On the same internet connection it works fine for Linux.

On Windows using the command format:

minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://mine.moneropool.org:80 -u YourMoneroAddress -p x -t 4

I get this error:

[2014-06-09 20:09:15] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2014-06-09 20:09:15] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://mine.moneropool.org:80
[2014-06-09 20:09:15] 4 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
[2014-06-09 20:09:15] Stratum connection failed: Received HTTP code 403 from proxy after CONNECT
[2014-06-09 20:09:15] ...retry after 10 seconds
^C

I suspect it is something to do with Norton Internet Security but I have tried disabling all the options in NIS I can think of.  Has anyone else solved this?
Up until now I have been using stratum proxies for other coins, but I can't find one for Monero.
Try moneropool.com?

2 w0lf. by "reverting commits" do you mean decreasing number of hugepages?

No, I mean reversing the latest edits.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: surfer43 on June 09, 2014, 12:23:40 PM
I can't get stratum to work from Windows regardless of what mining software I use. On the same internet connection it works fine for Linux.

On Windows using the command format:

minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://mine.moneropool.org:80 -u YourMoneroAddress -p x -t 4

I get this error:

[2014-06-09 20:09:15] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2014-06-09 20:09:15] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://mine.moneropool.org:80
[2014-06-09 20:09:15] 4 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
[2014-06-09 20:09:15] Stratum connection failed: Received HTTP code 403 from proxy after CONNECT
[2014-06-09 20:09:15] ...retry after 10 seconds
^C

I suspect it is something to do with Norton Internet Security but I have tried disabling all the options in NIS I can think of.  Has anyone else solved this?
Up until now I have been using stratum proxies for other coins, but I can't find one for Monero.

Do our other ports work? 5555, 8080, 7777, 8336


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: polecrab on June 09, 2014, 02:04:04 PM
I can't get stratum to work from Windows regardless of what mining software I use. On the same internet connection it works fine for Linux.

On Windows using the command format:

minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://mine.moneropool.org:80 -u YourMoneroAddress -p x -t 4

I get this error:

[2014-06-09 20:09:15] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2014-06-09 20:09:15] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://mine.moneropool.org:80
[2014-06-09 20:09:15] 4 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
[2014-06-09 20:09:15] Stratum connection failed: Received HTTP code 403 from proxy after CONNECT
[2014-06-09 20:09:15] ...retry after 10 seconds
^C

I suspect it is something to do with Norton Internet Security but I have tried disabling all the options in NIS I can think of.  Has anyone else solved this?
Up until now I have been using stratum proxies for other coins, but I can't find one for Monero.

Do our other ports work? 5555, 8080, 7777, 8336

Same result for all below, including moneropool.com

Quote
E:\apps\cpuminer-multi-wolf\cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-09-2014>minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://mine.moneropool.org:5555 -u <addr> -p x -t 4
[2014-06-09 23:55:39] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2014-06-09 23:55:39] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://mine.moneropool.org:5555
[2014-06-09 23:55:39] 4 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
[2014-06-09 23:55:39] Stratum connection failed: Received HTTP code 403 from proxy after CONNECT
[2014-06-09 23:55:39] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2014-06-09 23:55:49] Stratum connection failed: Received HTTP code 403 from proxy after CONNECT
[2014-06-09 23:55:49] ...retry after 10 seconds

stratum+tcp://mine.moneropool.org:8080
stratum+tcp://mine.moneropool.org:8336
stratum+tcp://mine.moneropool.com:3333


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: restless on June 09, 2014, 02:08:01 PM
Try ccproxy - through socks
like
-x socks5://ccproxy-address:1080

1080 is default, sometimes socks4 works better.
And freeware version supports upto 3 connections


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: 3dcgminer on June 09, 2014, 04:27:54 PM
On my i7-2700k@4,6GHz, the latest build
https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-09-2014.zip
seems to be slower, 240h/s on may 30 version, 220h/s at best with the above.
More/less cores did not help.

Guessing that Haswells get a boost while old Sandybridges loses out with the new optimizations.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: restless on June 09, 2014, 05:15:45 PM
I can confirm - i5-2500, new version is 5+% slower

PS: i5-4570 - again 5% slower with 3 threads :/
I have no idea if we should try to enable hugepages on Windows? These are disbaled by default


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 09, 2014, 06:25:08 PM
I can confirm - i5-2500, new version is 5+% slower

PS: i5-4570 - again 5% slower with 3 threads :/
I have no idea if we should try to enable hugepages on Windows? These are disbaled by default

It'd probably help a lot.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Litrbooh on June 09, 2014, 07:31:16 PM
Wolf0
Why i have with cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-09-2014 on i7-3770 only 130-150h/s, but with cpuminer-multi-wolf-05-29-2014 - 200h\s?
What could be the problem?

Win7 64bit


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 09, 2014, 07:34:45 PM
Wolf0
Why i have with cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-09-2014 on i7-3770 only 130-150h/s, but with cpuminer-multi-wolf-05-29-2014 - 200h\s?
What could be the problem?

Win7 64bit

Not 100% sure. Since most Win users can't compile their own binaries, I'd have to revert every commit, one by one, and build a Win64 binary for each >.<


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: raperinoa on June 09, 2014, 10:11:37 PM
hi wolfie, ty so much for your miner ;D and flurry! nor fury  :D

im testing with i74702MQ and yeah prolly drop -5% or zero different than 5-30-2014 :'(


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: xxnirvana69xx on June 10, 2014, 12:27:46 AM
All of my tests were done on an AMD FX-8320 @ 4.2GHz, 8GB 1833, Win7x64, ran @ -t 7. The average is from when lightly using the computer as normal and the peak, where it spends most of its time, when left alone. Now if only I can figure out how to compile it on windows myself lol.

5/29
   Peak – 322
   Average – 270
5/30
   Peak – 312
   Average – 265
Experimental
   Peak – 328
   Average – 275
6/8
   Peak – 331
   Average – 315


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 10, 2014, 01:39:47 AM
All of my tests were done on an AMD FX-8320 @ 4.2GHz, 8GB 1833, Win7x64, ran @ -t 7. The average is from when lightly using the computer as normal and the peak, where it spends most of its time, when left alone. Now if only I can figure out how to compile it on windows myself lol.

5/29
   Peak – 322
   Average – 270
5/30
   Peak – 312
   Average – 265
Experimental
   Peak – 328
   Average – 275
6/8
   Peak – 331
   Average – 315

Hm, so 6/8 is better for you... now I dunno what to do.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Agamemnus on June 10, 2014, 01:59:47 AM
I'd give all kinds of naughty favours for win64 binaries. With AES preferred for i7-4930k ;) ;) *nudge* *nudge*

I'll compile them soon.

I tried out the 9th of June on Win 7 64-bit and it gives a 3-4% reduction on an i5-2500k but maybe a 1% increase on an i7-4930k.

Can hugepages even be done on Windows?


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: drmavis on June 10, 2014, 02:05:00 AM
Yeah hugepages can be done - the YAM miners by yvg1900 (for MMC, PTS, etc.) use hugepages and are the fastest CPU miners for the coins it mines.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: obobob on June 10, 2014, 03:25:14 AM
I'm using GCC 4.8.2 and LD 2.23.52 compiled.
when I make , I got a error:

cpu-miner.c: In function 'miner_thread':
cpu-miner.c:1065:88: error: 'MADV_HUGEPAGE' undeclared (first use in this function)
   madvise(persistentctx, sizeof(struct cryptonight_ctx), MADV_RANDOM | MADV_WILLNEED | MADV_HUGEPAGE);

who can help me ?
thanks.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Agamemnus on June 10, 2014, 03:25:59 AM
Nice!

Avast antivirus just started registering this minerd.exe as dangerous :(


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 10, 2014, 03:29:31 AM
I'm using GCC 4.8.2 and LD 2.23.52 compiled.
when I make , I got a error:

cpu-miner.c: In function 'miner_thread':
cpu-miner.c:1065:88: error: 'MADV_HUGEPAGE' undeclared (first use in this function)
   madvise(persistentctx, sizeof(struct cryptonight_ctx), MADV_RANDOM | MADV_WILLNEED | MADV_HUGEPAGE);

who can help me ?
thanks.

What distro? It probably doesn't include hugepages.

Nice!

Avast antivirus just started registering this minerd.exe as dangerous :(

AV companies do that to boost the number of malware they "found" so they look good on paper. The miner is used by malware to mine on people's computers, but instead of just tagging the actual malware, they add the miner as well.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: obobob on June 10, 2014, 03:47:01 AM
I'm using GCC 4.8.2 and LD 2.23.52 compiled.
when I make , I got a error:

cpu-miner.c: In function 'miner_thread':
cpu-miner.c:1065:88: error: 'MADV_HUGEPAGE' undeclared (first use in this function)
   madvise(persistentctx, sizeof(struct cryptonight_ctx), MADV_RANDOM | MADV_WILLNEED | MADV_HUGEPAGE);

who can help me ?
thanks.

What distro? It probably doesn't include hugepages.

Nice!

Avast antivirus just started registering this minerd.exe as dangerous :(

AV companies do that to boost the number of malware they "found" so they look good on paper. The miner is used by malware to mine on people's computers, but instead of just tagging the actual malware, they add the miner as well.

CentOS6.3 x64


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 10, 2014, 04:28:26 AM
I'm using GCC 4.8.2 and LD 2.23.52 compiled.
when I make , I got a error:

cpu-miner.c: In function 'miner_thread':
cpu-miner.c:1065:88: error: 'MADV_HUGEPAGE' undeclared (first use in this function)
   madvise(persistentctx, sizeof(struct cryptonight_ctx), MADV_RANDOM | MADV_WILLNEED | MADV_HUGEPAGE);

who can help me ?
thanks.

What distro? It probably doesn't include hugepages.

Nice!

Avast antivirus just started registering this minerd.exe as dangerous :(

AV companies do that to boost the number of malware they "found" so they look good on paper. The miner is used by malware to mine on people's computers, but instead of just tagging the actual malware, they add the miner as well.

CentOS6.3 x64

Second report I've gotten of CentOS not working... I think the first was fixed by updating glibc.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Litrbooh on June 10, 2014, 04:49:28 AM
Not 100% sure. Since most Win users can't compile their own binaries, I'd have to revert every commit, one by one, and build a Win64 binary for each >.<
I always thought that the binary one for a particular type of Windows. Why did they each compile?


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: obobob on June 10, 2014, 04:59:01 AM
I'm using GCC 4.8.2 and LD 2.23.52 compiled.
when I make , I got a error:

cpu-miner.c: In function 'miner_thread':
cpu-miner.c:1065:88: error: 'MADV_HUGEPAGE' undeclared (first use in this function)
   madvise(persistentctx, sizeof(struct cryptonight_ctx), MADV_RANDOM | MADV_WILLNEED | MADV_HUGEPAGE);

who can help me ?
thanks.

What distro? It probably doesn't include hugepages.

Nice!

Avast antivirus just started registering this minerd.exe as dangerous :(

AV companies do that to boost the number of malware they "found" so they look good on paper. The miner is used by malware to mine on people's computers, but instead of just tagging the actual malware, they add the miner as well.

CentOS6.3 x64

Second report I've gotten of CentOS not working... I think the first was fixed by updating glibc.


many thanks!
I will try...


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 10, 2014, 07:35:28 AM
Not 100% sure. Since most Win users can't compile their own binaries, I'd have to revert every commit, one by one, and build a Win64 binary for each >.<
I always thought that the binary one for a particular type of Windows. Why did they each compile?

I'd need to, to find out which commit slowed it down - but now some people are reporting it's faster...


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: chris190 on June 10, 2014, 12:01:34 PM
I'd give all kinds of naughty favours for win64 binaries. With AES preferred for i7-4930k ;) ;) *nudge* *nudge*

I'll compile them soon.

I tried out the 9th of June on Win 7 64-bit and it gives a 3-4% reduction on an i5-2500k but maybe a 1% increase on an i7-4930k.

Can hugepages even be done on Windows?

What speed you get with an i7 4930k?

There is a difference with a i7 3930K?

I'm curious to find out the speed of the new processor i7 4970k! ;D About 400/500 h/s?  :o 8)

;)


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Agamemnus on June 10, 2014, 01:20:51 PM
I'd give all kinds of naughty favours for win64 binaries. With AES preferred for i7-4930k ;) ;) *nudge* *nudge*

I'll compile them soon.

I tried out the 9th of June on Win 7 64-bit and it gives a 3-4% reduction on an i5-2500k but maybe a 1% increase on an i7-4930k.

Can hugepages even be done on Windows?

What speed you get with an i7 4930k?

There is a difference with a i7 3930K?

I'm curious to find out the speed of the new processor i7 4970k! ;D About 400/500 h/s?  :o 8)

;)

It's only about 250 my dear friend, I'm using Windows 7, the real speeds are in Linux. :(


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: xxnirvana69xx on June 10, 2014, 03:34:35 PM
What are the speed differences in Linux from Windows? Might try Ubuntu again if the speed increase is worth it.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: chris190 on June 10, 2014, 04:19:24 PM
I'd give all kinds of naughty favours for win64 binaries. With AES preferred for i7-4930k ;) ;) *nudge* *nudge*

I'll compile them soon.

I tried out the 9th of June on Win 7 64-bit and it gives a 3-4% reduction on an i5-2500k but maybe a 1% increase on an i7-4930k.

Can hugepages even be done on Windows?

What speed you get with an i7 4930k?

There is a difference with a i7 3930K?

I'm curious to find out the speed of the new processor i7 4970k! ;D About 400/500 h/s?  :o 8)

;)

It's only about 250 my dear friend, I'm using Windows 7, the real speeds are in Linux. :(

thanks!

And what's the difference?


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: 5w00p on June 10, 2014, 06:53:35 PM
Linux:
http://s27.postimg.org/854scak03/coins1.jpg


VS


Windows:
http://s3.postimg.org/swqutdehv/coin2.jpg


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: xxnirvana69xx on June 10, 2014, 07:41:40 PM

Thanks for not helping ;-)


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 10, 2014, 08:07:13 PM

No, seriously - he's not joking. Linux gives WAY faster speeds, but it can't be virtualized - it has to be native.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: xxnirvana69xx on June 10, 2014, 08:10:06 PM
Well I was just curious in an actual speed difference. I don't want to install Ubuntu tonight for a 50h/s increase.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 10, 2014, 08:16:02 PM
Well I was just curious in an actual speed difference. I don't want to install Ubuntu tonight for a 50h/s increase.

We're talking up to 40% - 50%.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: DooLocsta on June 10, 2014, 08:33:24 PM
How can I make sure I am getting the AES-NI configured correct in Windows?  This is currently all I have access to but as soon as I start the miner I see it detects a new block then crashes.  Thanks.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 10, 2014, 08:35:27 PM
How can I make sure I am getting the AES-NI configured correct in Windows?  This is currently all I have access to but as soon as I start the miner I see it detects a new block then crashes.  Thanks.

There's no configuration - if it crashes, your CPU doesn't have it.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: c18machine on June 10, 2014, 08:36:47 PM
Wolf u must be getting paid by xmr team, why dont you just release an wild keccak miner?

yes, cryptonight is not only XMR/MRO as your topic title suggests


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: smooth on June 10, 2014, 08:43:00 PM
Wolf u must be getting paid by xmr team, why dont you just release an wild keccak miner?

He's not getting paid by XMR as far as I know.

Perhaps he just isn't interested in putting a lot of work into WK because WK is a tiny little niche thing that hasn't gotten much traction yet.



Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: c18machine on June 10, 2014, 08:49:54 PM
Wolf u must be getting paid by xmr team, why dont you just release an wild keccak miner?

He's not getting paid by XMR as far as I know.

Perhaps he just isn't interested in putting a lot of work into WK because WK is a tiny little niche thing that hasn't gotten much traction yet.



as far as u know right, cause cryptonote is anonymous.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 10, 2014, 10:52:25 PM
Wolf u must be getting paid by xmr team, why dont you just release an wild keccak miner?

yes, cryptonight is not only XMR/MRO as your topic title suggests

I'm not getting paid by the XMR team, and I'm not really interested in optimizing BBR's butchered version of keccak. Besides, it's written in C++; I hate it and it hates me.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: c18machine on June 10, 2014, 10:57:24 PM
Wolf u must be getting paid by xmr team, why dont you just release an wild keccak miner?

yes, cryptonight is not only XMR/MRO as your topic title suggests

I'm not getting paid by the XMR team, and I'm not really interested in optimizing BBR's butchered version of keccak. Besides, it's written in C++; I hate it and it hates me.

ofc you rather get a cheap imitation get known.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 10, 2014, 11:09:39 PM
Wolf u must be getting paid by xmr team, why dont you just release an wild keccak miner?

yes, cryptonight is not only XMR/MRO as your topic title suggests

I'm not getting paid by the XMR team, and I'm not really interested in optimizing BBR's butchered version of keccak. Besides, it's written in C++; I hate it and it hates me.

ofc you rather get a cheap imitation get known.

Last I checked, BBR is the cheap imitation - BCN is the original, and my miner works with it.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: c18machine on June 10, 2014, 11:13:41 PM
Just wait for the news.

and maybe thats why BBR has the same algo   :o


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 10, 2014, 11:51:02 PM
Just wait for the news.

and maybe thats why BBR has the same algo   :o

BBR uses wild keccak - BCN and XMR use CryptoNight.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: c18machine on June 10, 2014, 11:54:20 PM
Just wait for the news.

and maybe thats why BBR has the same algo   :o

BBR uses wild keccak - BCN and XMR use CryptoNight.

oh wait, u didnt even notice i was being sarcastic.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 11, 2014, 12:30:31 AM
Just wait for the news.

and maybe thats why BBR has the same algo   :o

BBR uses wild keccak - BCN and XMR use CryptoNight.

oh wait, u didnt even notice i was being sarcastic.

Doesn't come through very well in text.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: marada on June 11, 2014, 03:20:14 AM
I am attempting to compile this miner at two linux distros and have no luck. Need an advice.
Mint 13 + gcc 4.8 + libboost 1.55 and Mint 17

At Mint 13 I had to install additionaly autoconf 2.69 (stock is 2.68).

I changed also the line #3308 of configure file by removing -V and -qversion and leaving just --version as gcc didn't support it.

The miner seems to compile but doesn't work at all.
Even the benchmark needs URL and the miner is just quiet if I try to use at the pool. CPU is half-loaded.

Code:
./minerd -a cryptonight --benchmark
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] I go faster as root.
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] 5 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] HTTP request failed: No URL set!
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] ...retry after 10 seconds

I have found numerous errors in config.log

At Mint 17 the resoult is very similar.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/c5870shk2xaeglr/config.log (https://www.dropbox.com/s/c5870shk2xaeglr/config.log)


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 11, 2014, 03:21:42 AM
I am attempting to compile this miner at two linux distros and have no luck. Need an advice.
Mint 13 + gcc 4.8 + libboost 1.55 and Mint 17

At Mint 13 I had to install additionaly autoconf 2.69 (stock 2.68).

I changed also the line #3308 of configure file by removing -V and -qversion and leaving just --version as gcc didn't support it.

The miner seems to compile but doesn't work at all.
Even the benchmark needs URL and the miner is just quied if I try to use at the pool. CPU is half-loaded.

Code:
./minerd -a cryptonight --benchmark
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] I go faster as root.
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] 5 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] HTTP request failed: No URL set!
[2014-06-11 05:10:37] ...retry after 10 seconds

I have found numerous errors in config.log

At Mint 17 the resoult is very similar.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/c5870shk2xaeglr/config.log (https://www.dropbox.com/s/c5870shk2xaeglr/config.log)

You apparently didn't read the OP. Run it at the pool and wait - no more per-thread output. You will see hashrate when you find a share. Try stratum+tcp://mro.extremepool.org:5555 - they have a low share diff.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: marada on June 11, 2014, 03:24:38 AM
The CPU is not really loaded, quite unusual.

After a time and vm.nr_hugepages I realized it is working. May I need to work out a better CPU utilization.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: xxnirvana69xx on June 11, 2014, 05:13:12 AM
Well I was just curious in an actual speed difference. I don't want to install Ubuntu tonight for a 50h/s increase.

We're talking up to 40% - 50%.

Spent forever trying to get gcc sorted out and it looks like i was doing better in windows...

[2014-06-11 01:11:52] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 283.70 H/s at diff 25000.1 (yay!!!)


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 11, 2014, 05:54:05 AM
Well I was just curious in an actual speed difference. I don't want to install Ubuntu tonight for a 50h/s increase.

We're talking up to 40% - 50%.

Spent forever trying to get gcc sorted out and it looks like i was doing better in windows...

[2014-06-11 01:11:52] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 283.70 H/s at diff 25000.1 (yay!!!)

CPU? Did you use CFLAGS="-march=native" ./configure and then make? Also, did you configure the hugepages as detailed in the OP?


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: xxnirvana69xx on June 11, 2014, 06:02:07 AM
Well I was just curious in an actual speed difference. I don't want to install Ubuntu tonight for a 50h/s increase.

We're talking up to 40% - 50%.

Spent forever trying to get gcc sorted out and it looks like i was doing better in windows...

[2014-06-11 01:11:52] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 283.70 H/s at diff 25000.1 (yay!!!)

CPU? Did you use CFLAGS="-march=native" ./configure and then make? Also, did you configure the hugepages as detailed in the OP?

cd ~/ && rm -rf cpuminer && mkdir cpuminer && cd cpuminer && git clone http://github.com/wolf9466/cpuminer-multi.git && pushd cpuminer-multi && cd ~/cpuminer/cpuminer-multi && ./autogen.sh && export CFLAGS="-march=native"  && ./configure && make && unset CLFAGS && popd

and just now enabled huge pages @ 21.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: xxnirvana69xx on June 11, 2014, 06:03:35 AM
[2014-06-11 02:02:50] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 421.09 H/s at diff 5000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-11 02:02:54] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 420.73 H/s at diff 5000 (yay!!!)

Looking better...


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: xxnirvana69xx on June 11, 2014, 06:27:27 AM
[2014-06-11 02:25:08] submit_upstream_work stratum_send_line failed
[2014-06-11 02:25:08] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2014-06-11 02:26:14] stratum_recv_line timed out

Getting a lot of these now...


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 11, 2014, 06:29:17 AM
[2014-06-11 02:25:08] submit_upstream_work stratum_send_line failed
[2014-06-11 02:25:08] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2014-06-11 02:26:14] stratum_recv_line timed out

Getting a lot of these now...

Pool fuckup.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: pattanan on June 11, 2014, 09:04:54 AM
Can this miner run merge mining without using the crappy minergate.com?
If it can, how do I run it?
Thk


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: Wolf0 on June 11, 2014, 09:43:35 AM
Can this miner run merge mining without using the crappy minergate.com?
If it can, how do I run it?
Thk

I believe you need to do that server-side.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: Wolf0 on June 11, 2014, 03:03:23 PM
Bump for update.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: xxnirvana69xx on June 11, 2014, 03:18:18 PM
This was while @ 4.4ghz and -t 7 but i noticed that my cpu temp was getting up to 61c so i had to clock it back down
[2014-06-11 02:02:50] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 421.09 H/s at diff 5000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-11 02:02:54] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 420.73 H/s at diff 5000 (yay!!!)

This was while @ 4.0ghz and -t 7 and temp stays about 54
[2014-06-11 11:11:53] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 390.98 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-11 11:12:01] accepted: 5/5 (100.00%), 390.74 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)

So yes linux does give a decent speed boost but since it's also running everything faster it raises the temps up. I have a Hyper 212 Evo and 3 120mm case fans and it doesn't seem to be enough to keep the temps down far enough. Could be the paste not doing it's job but I'm seeing the temps with this cooler are about 8c lower than i was with stock.




Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 11, 2014, 03:22:11 PM
This was while @ 4.4ghz and -t 7 but i noticed that my cpu temp was getting up to 61c so i had to clock it back down
[2014-06-11 02:02:50] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 421.09 H/s at diff 5000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-11 02:02:54] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 420.73 H/s at diff 5000 (yay!!!)

This was while @ 4.0ghz and -t 7 and temp stays about 54
[2014-06-11 11:11:53] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 390.98 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-11 11:12:01] accepted: 5/5 (100.00%), 390.74 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)

So yes linux does give a decent speed boost but since it's also running everything faster it raises the temps up. I have a Hyper 212 Evo and 3 120mm case fans and it doesn't seem to be enough to keep the temps down far enough. Could be the paste not doing it's job but I'm seeing the temps with this cooler are about 8c lower than i was with stock.




62C and you're worried?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: Wolf0 on June 11, 2014, 04:14:57 PM
Are 32 bit binaries available?

People ask this so much. No, and there won't ever be.

No 32-bit system has AES-NI, and CryptoNight is meant for 64-bit. Yes, I could implement it in 32-bit, but it'd be so slow it'd be going backwards.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: PeaMine on June 11, 2014, 07:00:02 PM
This was while @ 4.4ghz and -t 7 but i noticed that my cpu temp was getting up to 61c so i had to clock it back down
[2014-06-11 02:02:50] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 421.09 H/s at diff 5000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-11 02:02:54] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 420.73 H/s at diff 5000 (yay!!!)

This was while @ 4.0ghz and -t 7 and temp stays about 54
[2014-06-11 11:11:53] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 390.98 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-11 11:12:01] accepted: 5/5 (100.00%), 390.74 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)

So yes linux does give a decent speed boost but since it's also running everything faster it raises the temps up. I have a Hyper 212 Evo and 3 120mm case fans and it doesn't seem to be enough to keep the temps down far enough. Could be the paste not doing it's job but I'm seeing the temps with this cooler are about 8c lower than i was with stock.




62C and you're worried?

I've ran them above 70c for weeks with no issue.  Cooler is better of course, but I don't think 60s C for your CPU is bad.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: xxnirvana69xx on June 11, 2014, 07:28:11 PM
This was while @ 4.4ghz and -t 7 but i noticed that my cpu temp was getting up to 61c so i had to clock it back down
[2014-06-11 02:02:50] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 421.09 H/s at diff 5000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-11 02:02:54] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 420.73 H/s at diff 5000 (yay!!!)

This was while @ 4.0ghz and -t 7 and temp stays about 54
[2014-06-11 11:11:53] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 390.98 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-11 11:12:01] accepted: 5/5 (100.00%), 390.74 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)

So yes linux does give a decent speed boost but since it's also running everything faster it raises the temps up. I have a Hyper 212 Evo and 3 120mm case fans and it doesn't seem to be enough to keep the temps down far enough. Could be the paste not doing it's job but I'm seeing the temps with this cooler are about 8c lower than i was with stock.




62C and you're worried?

I've ran them above 70c for weeks with no issue.  Cooler is better of course, but I don't think 60s C for your CPU is bad.

Well it seems the IC7 diamond paste had dried up in 2 weeks, pretty crap. I added the crap coolermaster paste and its holding at 56 @ 4.4ghz. I read multiple places that 61 or higher on the amd fx isn't good.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: c18machine on June 11, 2014, 11:10:04 PM
configure: error: could not find crypto

how do you solve this?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: Wolf0 on June 12, 2014, 12:07:18 AM
configure: error: could not find crypto

how do you solve this?

Install libssl-dev.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: nrg_wolf on June 12, 2014, 01:47:50 AM
is this faster then claymores cpu miner?? wolf you should try and make a gpu miner thats faster and more stable.    😃


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER 06/08/2014
Post by: Agamemnus on June 12, 2014, 02:11:10 AM
Well it seems the IC7 diamond paste had dried up in 2 weeks, pretty crap. I added the crap coolermaster paste and its holding at 56 @ 4.4ghz. I read multiple places that 61 or higher on the amd fx isn't good.

Ditch that EVO cooler and grab yourself a Silverstone TD03 or the nearest water cooler that you can fit in your case (they are all different, make sure it fits before you do it). Once you have that, your temps will be so much lower for everything you do. 60c isn't bad on those but 65c is shortening the life span. You should be able to keep it lower than 60 almost indefinitely, especially with this miner which doesn't even pass 45c on my 4930k.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: Wolf0 on June 12, 2014, 04:50:15 AM
is this faster then claymores cpu miner?? wolf you should try and make a gpu miner thats faster and more stable.    😃

Claymore has a CPU miner? Link me.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: nrg_wolf on June 12, 2014, 05:49:55 AM
is this faster then claymores cpu miner?? wolf you should try and make a gpu miner thats faster and more stable.    😃

Claymore has a CPU miner? Link me.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=647251.0



Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: smooth on June 12, 2014, 06:49:29 AM
is this faster then claymores cpu miner?? wolf you should try and make a gpu miner thats faster and more stable.    😃

Claymore has a CPU miner? Link me.

I don't see why it would be since it claims 270 H/s on a 4770 and this one claims 300+, and on top of that Claymore takes 5% of your hash rate. I guess Claymore has a fan base though, so perhaps people use it.

His low CPU mode looks interesting though, I wonder what that is doing.



Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: ozzy1926 on June 12, 2014, 06:52:17 AM
is this faster then claymores cpu miner?? wolf you should try and make a gpu miner thats faster and more stable.    😃

Claymore has a CPU miner? Link me.

I don't see why it would be since it claims 270 H/s on a 4770 and this one claims 300+, and on top of that Claymore takes 5% of your hash rate. I guess Claymore has a fan base though, so perhaps people use it.

His low CPU mode looks interesting though, I wonder what that is doing.



i tried both and for me claymores is giving more stable hashrates win 7 x64


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: nrg_wolf on June 12, 2014, 07:25:08 AM
is this faster then claymores cpu miner?? wolf you should try and make a gpu miner thats faster and more stable.    😃

Claymore has a CPU miner? Link me.

I don't see why it would be since it claims 270 H/s on a 4770 and this one claims 300+, and on top of that Claymore takes 5% of your hash rate. I guess Claymore has a fan base though, so perhaps people use it.

His low CPU mode looks interesting though, I wonder what that is doing.



i tried both and for me claymores is giving more stable hashrates win 7 x64

i can vouch for its speed as well and the stability of the cpu miner, gpu miner is a complete differnt kettle of fish, somewhat unstable as it stands.

4770k at stock clocks 250h/s at T-4
2600 non K at stock clocks 234 h/s at t-4

its nothing to do with a fan base, its at current the more powerful miner that supplys the highest output. and yes 5% for cpu and 5% for gpu miner plus pool fee's thats quite a loss on the pocket for smaller miners like myself.....


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: Agamemnus on June 12, 2014, 07:49:19 AM
On Windows 7 I get about 5% extra with Claymore's and it takes 5% in fees so for me it's not gaining anything.

I just tipped Wolf a quarter XMR. There's a whole XMR waiting for a Windows 7 hugepages version ;)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: Wolf0 on June 12, 2014, 07:52:37 AM
On Windows 7 I get about 5% extra with Claymore's and it takes 5% in fees so for me it's not gaining anything.

I just tipped Wolf a quarter XMR. There's a whole XMR waiting for a Windows 7 hugepages version ;)

Try Linux. Seriously, it's like 40% faster.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: Agamemnus on June 12, 2014, 07:56:19 AM
I can't mine while playing all my games on Linux :(

I get the most H/s at about half my max threads, so 6, which uses 50% of my CPU. So I can happily play Hearthstone, Path of Exile, League of Legends, all that good stuff and I'm mining the whole time. Install Linux, and half my favourite games can no longer be played.

At best I can do a VM, but I gather that doesn't get any increase amirite?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: nrg_wolf on June 12, 2014, 08:07:34 AM
i cant run linix, no idea how, plus the gpu miner has no support for linux


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: deevilknight on June 12, 2014, 01:19:15 PM
How to run this miner on Ubuntu OS. I installed ubuntu(first time in my life, so am not good with linux) I have only windows binare, and it does not work on linux. Where to download this miner for linux? Thanks in advance.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: sleepdog on June 12, 2014, 01:21:48 PM
Anyone fancy chucking out a non-AES-NI version for windows?

You'd have the undying gratitude of all us old cpu users (probably just me by the looks of it.... ;)).


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: equipoise on June 12, 2014, 01:34:16 PM
^https://github.com/LucasJones/cpuminer-multi/releases (https://github.com/LucasJones/cpuminer-multi/releases)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: sleepdog on June 12, 2014, 02:54:36 PM
Maybe I wasn't being clear, I meant a non-AES-NI version of Wolf's miner. I already use the Lucas one.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: Wolf0 on June 12, 2014, 04:57:59 PM
Maybe I wasn't being clear, I meant a non-AES-NI version of Wolf's miner. I already use the Lucas one.

Well, mine is faster for non-AES-NI, too, so... I suppose.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: best2002 on June 12, 2014, 05:31:16 PM
Forbidden

You don't have permission to access /cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-12-2014.zip on this server. ???


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: Wolf0 on June 12, 2014, 05:36:58 PM
Forbidden

You don't have permission to access /cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-12-2014.zip on this server. ???

Oops. Try now.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: surfer43 on June 12, 2014, 09:43:17 PM
I give 200 XMR for open source GPU miner. ;D


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: Wolf0 on June 12, 2014, 10:00:10 PM
I give 200 XMR for open source GPU miner. ;D

Seriously? Because I *might* have one. Of course, it might also be near useless.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: nrg_wolf on June 12, 2014, 10:30:43 PM
I give 200 XMR for open source GPU miner. ;D

Seriously? Because I *might* have one. Of course, it might also be near useless.

i hope ya serious. even i would donate you some XMR for a decent working gpu miner even thou i dont have much.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: Wolf0 on June 12, 2014, 10:34:54 PM
I give 200 XMR for open source GPU miner. ;D

Seriously? Because I *might* have one. Of course, it might also be near useless.

i hope ya serious. even i would donate you some XMR for a decent working gpu miner even thou i dont have much.

Nah.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: iso3789 on June 12, 2014, 10:54:29 PM
hey monero miners!


I'm new in mining, so today it's the first day that i mine monero,
the miner is running for 5 hours now, for me everything looks ok but i didn't get any moneros so far,
im mining with the latest miner of this forum (40-50 hashes) and i've typed in my monero adress
everything is in sync...

I don't know
So my question is how long does it take to get the mined moneros from the pool that i'm mining (extremehash)?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: Wolf0 on June 12, 2014, 11:14:45 PM
hey monero miners!


I'm new in mining, so today it's the first day that i mine monero,
the miner is running for 5 hours now, for me everything looks ok but i didn't get any moneros so far,
im mining with the latest miner of this forum (40-50 hashes) and i've typed in my monero adress
everything is in sync...

I don't know
So my question is how long does it take to get the mined moneros from the pool that i'm mining (extremehash)?

They have to find a block first, then that block must confirm. Only then will you be paid.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: smooth on June 12, 2014, 11:20:29 PM
4770k at stock clocks 250h/s at T-4
2600 non K at stock clocks 234 h/s at t-4

its nothing to do with a fan base, its at current the more powerful miner that supplys the highest output.

Nobody seems to be doing careful testing with complete environment data so we can't be sure, but there is a screen shot for this miner showing >300 on a 4770k. I have no idea if that is overclocked or anything else difficult to reproduce.




Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: nrg_wolf on June 12, 2014, 11:20:48 PM
I give 200 XMR for open source GPU miner. ;D

Seriously? Because I *might* have one. Of course, it might also be near useless.

i hope ya serious. even i would donate you some XMR for a decent working gpu miner even thou i dont have much.

Nah.

aww Wolf0 you had my hopes up there :(


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: nrg_wolf on June 12, 2014, 11:22:15 PM
4770k at stock clocks 250h/s at T-4
2600 non K at stock clocks 234 h/s at t-4

its nothing to do with a fan base, its at current the more powerful miner that supplys the highest output.

Nobody seems to be doing careful testing with complete environment data so we can't be sure, but there is a screen shot for this miner showing >300 on a 4770k. I have no idea if that is overclocked or anything else difficult to reproduce.




i dare say overclocked, or in linux which works better for cpu mineing from what i have gathered.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: surfer43 on June 12, 2014, 11:25:51 PM
I give 200 XMR for open source GPU miner. ;D

Seriously? Because I *might* have one. Of course, it might also be near useless.
Revision:

I give 200 XMR for open source GPU miner that is as fast or faster than Claymore's GPU miner v1.2. I give additional 0.25 XMR for every 1% it is faster than Claymore's GPU miner v1.2.  ;D


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: smooth on June 12, 2014, 11:36:50 PM
4770k at stock clocks 250h/s at T-4
2600 non K at stock clocks 234 h/s at t-4

its nothing to do with a fan base, its at current the more powerful miner that supplys the highest output.

Nobody seems to be doing careful testing with complete environment data so we can't be sure, but there is a screen shot for this miner showing >300 on a 4770k. I have no idea if that is overclocked or anything else difficult to reproduce.




i dare say overclocked, or in linux which works better for cpu mineing from what i have gathered.

Yeah I don't really understand why Linux would be faster, and I can't come up with a good reason for it, but I never use Windows any more so it isn't something I'm going to work on.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: Wolf0 on June 12, 2014, 11:41:36 PM
4770k at stock clocks 250h/s at T-4
2600 non K at stock clocks 234 h/s at t-4

its nothing to do with a fan base, its at current the more powerful miner that supplys the highest output.

Nobody seems to be doing careful testing with complete environment data so we can't be sure, but there is a screen shot for this miner showing >300 on a 4770k. I have no idea if that is overclocked or anything else difficult to reproduce.




i dare say overclocked, or in linux which works better for cpu mineing from what i have gathered.

Yeah I don't really understand why Linux would be faster, and I can't come up with a good reason for it, but I never use Windows any more so it isn't something I'm going to work on.

Because the Windows kernel is retarded and won't take hints.

No, seriously. I can give the linux kernel a hint about how I'm going to be using the memory and how it should handle it. It is, of course, free to ignore me, but it usually doesn't, resulting in faster accesses.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: nrg_wolf on June 12, 2014, 11:42:20 PM
4770k at stock clocks 250h/s at T-4
2600 non K at stock clocks 234 h/s at t-4

its nothing to do with a fan base, its at current the more powerful miner that supplys the highest output.

Nobody seems to be doing careful testing with complete environment data so we can't be sure, but there is a screen shot for this miner showing >300 on a 4770k. I have no idea if that is overclocked or anything else difficult to reproduce.




i dare say overclocked, or in linux which works better for cpu mineing from what i have gathered.

Yeah I don't really understand why Linux would be faster, and I can't come up with a good reason for it, but I never use Windows any more so it isn't something I'm going to work on.

you aint missing much on windows lol....... only problem for me is, the claymore gpu miner for cryptonight algo has no linux support at this current date and no real time frame for support yet otherwise i would be dumpin windows for Pimp and run it all that way. once i figure out how to use it anyway lol...


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: smooth on June 12, 2014, 11:47:26 PM
4770k at stock clocks 250h/s at T-4
2600 non K at stock clocks 234 h/s at t-4

its nothing to do with a fan base, its at current the more powerful miner that supplys the highest output.

Nobody seems to be doing careful testing with complete environment data so we can't be sure, but there is a screen shot for this miner showing >300 on a 4770k. I have no idea if that is overclocked or anything else difficult to reproduce.




i dare say overclocked, or in linux which works better for cpu mineing from what i have gathered.

Yeah I don't really understand why Linux would be faster, and I can't come up with a good reason for it, but I never use Windows any more so it isn't something I'm going to work on.

Because the Windows kernel is retarded and won't take hints.

No, seriously. I can give the linux kernel a hint about how I'm going to be using the memory and how it should handle it. It is, of course, free to ignore me, but it usually doesn't, resulting in faster accesses.

The access pattern hints only matter for virtual memory that gets paged, which shouldn't happen. The prefill hint might matter, but only during warmup, after that they should be the same. The hugepage stuff should result in the same speed on Windows as Linux, if everything is working correctly, though I understand this is trickier to arrange on Windows. There might be other issues, such as how threading is being handled, I'm not sure.

I'm pretty sure a good Windows programmer could fix this (as claymore appears to have done) but I'm not one by choice so I can't directly help.





Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: Wolf0 on June 12, 2014, 11:58:43 PM
4770k at stock clocks 250h/s at T-4
2600 non K at stock clocks 234 h/s at t-4

its nothing to do with a fan base, its at current the more powerful miner that supplys the highest output.

Nobody seems to be doing careful testing with complete environment data so we can't be sure, but there is a screen shot for this miner showing >300 on a 4770k. I have no idea if that is overclocked or anything else difficult to reproduce.




i dare say overclocked, or in linux which works better for cpu mineing from what i have gathered.

Yeah I don't really understand why Linux would be faster, and I can't come up with a good reason for it, but I never use Windows any more so it isn't something I'm going to work on.

Because the Windows kernel is retarded and won't take hints.

No, seriously. I can give the linux kernel a hint about how I'm going to be using the memory and how it should handle it. It is, of course, free to ignore me, but it usually doesn't, resulting in faster accesses.

The access pattern hints only matter for virtual memory that gets paged, which shouldn't happen. The prefill hint might matter, but only during warmup, after that they should be the same. The hugepage stuff should result in the same speed on Windows as Linux, if everything is working correctly, though I understand this is trickier to arrange on Windows. There might be other issues, such as how threading is being handled, I'm not sure.

I'm pretty sure a good Windows programmer could fix this (as claymore appears to have done) but I'm not one by choice so I can't directly help.





Nope, because readahead. I'm using it for random access, and I tell the linux kernel that with madvise(). It can be mitigated, but not entirely fixed. The reason I haven't done it is because I don't want to boot into Windows to test.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: smooth on June 13, 2014, 12:03:23 AM
4770k at stock clocks 250h/s at T-4
2600 non K at stock clocks 234 h/s at t-4

its nothing to do with a fan base, its at current the more powerful miner that supplys the highest output.

Nobody seems to be doing careful testing with complete environment data so we can't be sure, but there is a screen shot for this miner showing >300 on a 4770k. I have no idea if that is overclocked or anything else difficult to reproduce.




i dare say overclocked, or in linux which works better for cpu mineing from what i have gathered.

Yeah I don't really understand why Linux would be faster, and I can't come up with a good reason for it, but I never use Windows any more so it isn't something I'm going to work on.

Because the Windows kernel is retarded and won't take hints.

No, seriously. I can give the linux kernel a hint about how I'm going to be using the memory and how it should handle it. It is, of course, free to ignore me, but it usually doesn't, resulting in faster accesses.

The access pattern hints only matter for virtual memory that gets paged, which shouldn't happen. The prefill hint might matter, but only during warmup, after that they should be the same. The hugepage stuff should result in the same speed on Windows as Linux, if everything is working correctly, though I understand this is trickier to arrange on Windows. There might be other issues, such as how threading is being handled, I'm not sure.

I'm pretty sure a good Windows programmer could fix this (as claymore appears to have done) but I'm not one by choice so I can't directly help.





Nope, because readahead. I'm using it for random access, and I tell the linux kernel that with madvise(). It can be mitigated, but not entirely fixed. The reason I haven't done it is because I don't want to boot into Windows to test.

Kernel readahead only applies to I/O. There is also CPU prefetch, but that is automatically detected by the hardware.



Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: kephael on June 13, 2014, 01:31:12 AM
OSX 10.9.3
brew install automake autoconf curl
then git clone repo, run autogen, run no macro.pl
When exec ./configure, I got error:

./configure: line 5666: syntax error near unexpected token `,'
./configure: line 5666: `LIBCURL_CHECK_CONFIG(, 7.15.2, ,'

I have fresh install of OSX. What wrong?

Thanks.

Same issue on Ubuntu. Needed to install  libcurl4-nss-dev to fix.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: trogdorjw73 on June 13, 2014, 09:10:32 AM
Anyone have a walkthrough for getting this running on an Amazon EC2 server? (And expected performance would be nice to know.)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: Wolf0 on June 13, 2014, 04:12:38 PM
4770k at stock clocks 250h/s at T-4
2600 non K at stock clocks 234 h/s at t-4

its nothing to do with a fan base, its at current the more powerful miner that supplys the highest output.

Nobody seems to be doing careful testing with complete environment data so we can't be sure, but there is a screen shot for this miner showing >300 on a 4770k. I have no idea if that is overclocked or anything else difficult to reproduce.




i dare say overclocked, or in linux which works better for cpu mineing from what i have gathered.

Yeah I don't really understand why Linux would be faster, and I can't come up with a good reason for it, but I never use Windows any more so it isn't something I'm going to work on.

Because the Windows kernel is retarded and won't take hints.

No, seriously. I can give the linux kernel a hint about how I'm going to be using the memory and how it should handle it. It is, of course, free to ignore me, but it usually doesn't, resulting in faster accesses.

The access pattern hints only matter for virtual memory that gets paged, which shouldn't happen. The prefill hint might matter, but only during warmup, after that they should be the same. The hugepage stuff should result in the same speed on Windows as Linux, if everything is working correctly, though I understand this is trickier to arrange on Windows. There might be other issues, such as how threading is being handled, I'm not sure.

I'm pretty sure a good Windows programmer could fix this (as claymore appears to have done) but I'm not one by choice so I can't directly help.





Nope, because readahead. I'm using it for random access, and I tell the linux kernel that with madvise(). It can be mitigated, but not entirely fixed. The reason I haven't done it is because I don't want to boot into Windows to test.

Kernel readahead only applies to I/O. There is also CPU prefetch, but that is automatically detected by the hardware.



But it is I/O, because it's at least sometimes getting paged out. That's why hugepages help - they can't be.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - FASTER
Post by: billotronic on June 13, 2014, 05:19:36 PM
4770k at stock clocks 250h/s at T-4
2600 non K at stock clocks 234 h/s at t-4

its nothing to do with a fan base, its at current the more powerful miner that supplys the highest output.

Nobody seems to be doing careful testing with complete environment data so we can't be sure, but there is a screen shot for this miner showing >300 on a 4770k. I have no idea if that is overclocked or anything else difficult to reproduce.




i dare say overclocked, or in linux which works better for cpu mineing from what i have gathered.

Yeah I don't really understand why Linux would be faster, and I can't come up with a good reason for it, but I never use Windows any more so it isn't something I'm going to work on.

Because the Windows kernel is retarded and won't take hints.

No, seriously. I can give the linux kernel a hint about how I'm going to be using the memory and how it should handle it. It is, of course, free to ignore me, but it usually doesn't, resulting in faster accesses.

The access pattern hints only matter for virtual memory that gets paged, which shouldn't happen. The prefill hint might matter, but only during warmup, after that they should be the same. The hugepage stuff should result in the same speed on Windows as Linux, if everything is working correctly, though I understand this is trickier to arrange on Windows. There might be other issues, such as how threading is being handled, I'm not sure.

I'm pretty sure a good Windows programmer could fix this (as claymore appears to have done) but I'm not one by choice so I can't directly help.





Nope, because readahead. I'm using it for random access, and I tell the linux kernel that with madvise(). It can be mitigated, but not entirely fixed. The reason I haven't done it is because I don't want to boot into Windows to test.

Kernel readahead only applies to I/O. There is also CPU prefetch, but that is automatically detected by the hardware.



But it is I/O, because it's at least sometimes getting paged out. That's why hugepages help - they can't be.

Here is my very technical answer: Windows just sucks!


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: billotronic on June 13, 2014, 05:22:43 PM
Anyone have a walkthrough for getting this running on an Amazon EC2 server? (And expected performance would be nice to know.)

At the market price, difficulty, and cost per hour of a spot instance, you are most likely going to loose money. If you are hell bent on trying, I would wait for the net hash to drop back down around 3 MH/s


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: Wolf0 on June 14, 2014, 08:16:45 AM
Anyone have a walkthrough for getting this running on an Amazon EC2 server? (And expected performance would be nice to know.)

At the market price, difficulty, and cost per hour of a spot instance, you are most likely going to loose money. If you are hell bent on trying, I would wait for the net hash to drop back down around 3 MH/s

Do this:

sudo apt-get install git make autoconf automake libcurl4-openssl-dev libjansson-dev build-essential && git clone https://github.com/wolf9466/cpuminer-multi.git && cd cpuminer-multi && CFLAGS="-march=native" ./configure && make

Didn't test it, but it should work.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: David Latapie on June 14, 2014, 04:40:56 PM
Do this:

sudo apt-get install git make autoconf automake libcurl4-openssl-dev libjansson-dev build-essential && git clone https://github.com/wolf9466/cpuminer-multi.git && cd cpuminer-multi && CFLAGS="-march=native" ./configure && make

Didn't test it, but it should work.

Do this:

Code:
cd ~ && rm -f install_monero.sh && wget http://monero.cc/downloads/install_monero.sh && bash install_monero.sh
When asked, choose option 2 if you are making a fresh intall, or option 7 if you are updating.

Tested and works.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: coomme on June 14, 2014, 07:16:31 PM
win32 miner . where  ;D ;D


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: jap1968 on June 14, 2014, 08:48:17 PM
win32 miner . where  ;D ;D

Nowhere


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: equipoise on June 14, 2014, 09:21:21 PM
win32 miner . where  ;D ;D

Nowhere
There are 32 bit windows binaries here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.0). You could try if the 32 bit simpleminer.exe is working.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: best2002 on June 14, 2014, 10:27:41 PM
Any version cannot run on 1055 t. Who can help me.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: tequillaquagga on June 15, 2014, 11:31:30 AM
Why still no OSX binaries?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: Wolf0 on June 15, 2014, 11:33:46 AM
Why still no OSX binaries?

I don't have a Mac and don't like them. However, I have retained compatibility if someone wishes to build for it.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: tequillaquagga on June 15, 2014, 11:36:33 AM
I don't have a Mac and don't like them. However, I have retained compatibility if someone wishes to build for it.

I have and want to build, but cannot do this. Libcurl error, while configure.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: Wolf0 on June 15, 2014, 11:38:55 AM
I don't have a Mac and don't like them. However, I have retained compatibility if someone wishes to build for it.

I have and want to build, but cannot do this. Libcurl error, while configure.

That's because you don't have the curl library installed, and if you do, then you forgot to re-run autogen after installing it.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: tequillaquagga on June 15, 2014, 11:41:56 AM
That's because you don't have the curl library installed, and if you do, then you forgot to re-run autogen after installing it.

I have curl, libcurl should be shipped with it.

Code:
brew list
autoconf cloog curl isl libtool openssl
automake cmake gcc jansson miniupnpc pkg-config
boost cpuminer-multi gmp libmpc mpfr


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: Wolf0 on June 15, 2014, 11:43:54 AM
That's because you don't have the curl library installed, and if you do, then you forgot to re-run autogen after installing it.

I have curl, libcurl should be shipped with it.

Code:
brew list
autoconf cloog curl isl libtool openssl
automake cmake gcc jansson miniupnpc pkg-config
boost cpuminer-multi gmp libmpc mpfr

Do you have the headers and such, or just the binary shared libs?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: tequillaquagga on June 15, 2014, 11:58:18 AM
Do you have the headers and such, or just the binary shared libs?

I don't know. How to check it?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: Wolf0 on June 15, 2014, 12:27:58 PM
Do you have the headers and such, or just the binary shared libs?

I don't know. How to check it?

Beats me - I don't use a Mac.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: earther on June 15, 2014, 03:32:45 PM
I got some problem.  ???

It didn't receive any accept but it show only pool diff and network found new block.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: dewdeded on June 15, 2014, 03:44:33 PM
I don't have a Mac and don't like them. However, I have retained compatibility if someone wishes to build for it.
I have and want to build, but cannot do this. Libcurl error, while configure.

Do:
 brew link curl --force


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: Wolf0 on June 15, 2014, 03:54:58 PM
I got some problem.  ???

It didn't receive any accept but it show only pool diff and network found new block.

Not only is this in the OP, it's been answered in the thread before. It's normal.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: digicoin on June 15, 2014, 06:30:07 PM
Eerybody,

Please join Wolf's pool http://pool.cryptoescrow.eu/#

My miners are on it. My hash rate is higher and more stable than in other pools


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: best2002 on June 15, 2014, 07:02:04 PM
Normal operation of the 1055T, the program can open but not working, the problem can be solved?
6-12  version.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: phzi on June 16, 2014, 01:40:09 AM
Eerybody,

Please join Wolf's pool http://pool.cryptoescrow.eu/#

My miners are on it. My hash rate is higher and more stable than in other pools
No block in 10 hours with that hashrate is worrying...


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: Agamemnus on June 16, 2014, 03:17:29 AM
Eerybody,

Please join Wolf's pool http://pool.cryptoescrow.eu/#

My miners are on it. My hash rate is higher and more stable than in other pools
No block in 10 hours with that hashrate is worrying...

All the pools are showing the same thing. I read somewhere it's because of a really high orphan rate.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: earther on June 16, 2014, 04:47:44 AM
It didn't show my hashrate. Is it normal ?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/yc2p7zc8et3kupt/Capture.PNG


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: Wolf0 on June 16, 2014, 06:22:35 AM
It didn't show my hashrate. Is it normal ?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/yc2p7zc8et3kupt/Capture.PNG

*facepaw* Okay, this is the LAST time I will answer this question. Yes, it is normal.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: cisahasa on June 16, 2014, 10:30:25 AM
It didn't show my hashrate. Is it normal ?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/yc2p7zc8et3kupt/Capture.PNG

*facepaw* Okay, this is the LAST time I will answer this question. Yes, it is normal.

i have same issue, updated my VPS miners(60cores)
now none shows any hashrate, neither does pool= 0h/s
no single hash for hours
updating back to old miner..


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: Wolf0 on June 16, 2014, 10:34:40 AM
It didn't show my hashrate. Is it normal ?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/yc2p7zc8et3kupt/Capture.PNG

*facepaw* Okay, this is the LAST time I will answer this question. Yes, it is normal.

i have same issue, updated my VPS miners(60cores)
now none shows any hashrate, neither does pool= 0h/s
no single hash for hours
updating back to old miner..

Do they have AES-NI?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: cisahasa on June 16, 2014, 10:42:04 AM
It didn't show my hashrate. Is it normal ?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/yc2p7zc8et3kupt/Capture.PNG

*facepaw* Okay, this is the LAST time I will answer this question. Yes, it is normal.

i have same issue, updated my VPS miners(60cores)
now none shows any hashrate, neither does pool= 0h/s
no single hash for hours
updating back to old miner..

Do they have AES-NI?

i dont think all of them have, chunkhost.com


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: Wolf0 on June 16, 2014, 10:43:15 AM
It didn't show my hashrate. Is it normal ?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/yc2p7zc8et3kupt/Capture.PNG

*facepaw* Okay, this is the LAST time I will answer this question. Yes, it is normal.

i have same issue, updated my VPS miners(60cores)
now none shows any hashrate, neither does pool= 0h/s
no single hash for hours
updating back to old miner..

Do they have AES-NI?

i dont think all of them have, chunkhost.com

Well, make sure that you're building the ones that don't with --disable-aes-ni, or they won't hash.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: cisahasa on June 16, 2014, 11:06:58 AM
It didn't show my hashrate. Is it normal ?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/yc2p7zc8et3kupt/Capture.PNG

*facepaw* Okay, this is the LAST time I will answer this question. Yes, it is normal.

i have same issue, updated my VPS miners(60cores)
now none shows any hashrate, neither does pool= 0h/s
no single hash for hours
updating back to old miner..

Do they have AES-NI?

i dont think all of them have, chunkhost.com

Well, make sure that you're building the ones that don't with --disable-aes-ni, or they won't hash.


./autogen.sh
CFLAGS="-march=native"
./configure --disable-aes-ni
make

??? this?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: Wolf0 on June 16, 2014, 11:08:03 AM
It didn't show my hashrate. Is it normal ?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/yc2p7zc8et3kupt/Capture.PNG

*facepaw* Okay, this is the LAST time I will answer this question. Yes, it is normal.

i have same issue, updated my VPS miners(60cores)
now none shows any hashrate, neither does pool= 0h/s
no single hash for hours
updating back to old miner..

Do they have AES-NI?

i dont think all of them have, chunkhost.com

Well, make sure that you're building the ones that don't with --disable-aes-ni, or they won't hash.


./autogen.sh
CFLAGS="-march=native"
./configure --disable-aes-ni
make

??? this?

No.

./autogen.sh
CFLAGS="-march=native" ./configure --disable-aes-ni
make


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: mindless on June 16, 2014, 11:59:01 AM
Eerybody,

Please join Wolf's pool http://pool.cryptoescrow.eu/#

My miners are on it. My hash rate is higher and more stable than in other pools
No block in 10 hours with that hashrate is worrying...

All the pools are showing the same thing. I read somewhere it's because of a really high orphan rate.
Everything is fixed up - pool is running smoothly.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: mcpackin on June 16, 2014, 04:50:03 PM
Eerybody,

Please join Wolf's pool http://pool.cryptoescrow.eu/#

My miners are on it. My hash rate is higher and more stable than in other pools
No block in 10 hours with that hashrate is worrying...

All the pools are showing the same thing. I read somewhere it's because of a really high orphan rate.
Everything is fixed up - pool is running smoothly.

I am showing a lot of these:
Code:
[2014-06-16 16:42:36] stratum_recv_line failed
[2014-06-16 16:42:36] ...retry after 10 seconds

I have miners pointed to stratum+tcp://pool.cryptoescrow.eu:3333, is this normal? I thought I read some where this is caused by something to do with the pool?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 16, 2014, 05:14:23 PM
Eerybody,

Please join Wolf's pool http://pool.cryptoescrow.eu/#

My miners are on it. My hash rate is higher and more stable than in other pools
No block in 10 hours with that hashrate is worrying...

All the pools are showing the same thing. I read somewhere it's because of a really high orphan rate.
Everything is fixed up - pool is running smoothly.

I am showing a lot of these:
Code:
[2014-06-16 16:42:36] stratum_recv_line failed
[2014-06-16 16:42:36] ...retry after 10 seconds

I have miners pointed to stratum+tcp://pool.cryptoescrow.eu:3333, is this normal? I thought I read some where this is caused by something to do with the pool?

Pool is fine... although I didn't test my latest commit... I'll do that now.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 16, 2014, 05:23:10 PM
Yup, I done broke it - reverted the last commit for now. That'll teach me to push commits without testing.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: mcpackin on June 16, 2014, 05:35:39 PM
Awesome, just pulled and it seems to be fixed :D... I do have an odd issue with a few EC2 instances... They start at 1Kh/s and drop to about 385Kh/s... I am not sure why yet..


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 16, 2014, 05:37:45 PM
Awesome, just pulled and it seems to be fixed :D... I do have an odd issue with a few EC2 instances... They start at 1Kh/s and drop to about 385Kh/s... I am not sure why yet..

Throttling, most likely - you're using cheap ones?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: mcpackin on June 16, 2014, 05:42:35 PM
Awesome, just pulled and it seems to be fixed :D... I do have an odd issue with a few EC2 instances... They start at 1Kh/s and drop to about 385Kh/s... I am not sure why yet..

Throttling, most likely - you're using cheap ones?

Well that is lame, I am using the c3.8xlarge instance.. I figured they wouldn't throttle the CPU demanding instances..

EDIT: I figured it out! Pretty simple mistake lol, I had another miner running under a screen running as root.. So calling just screen would return there were no screens... But doing a sudo screen showed it.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: xxnirvana69xx on June 16, 2014, 06:23:48 PM
Hashing at 410-430 locally but only pulling about 330 on http://pool.cryptoescrow.eu/


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 16, 2014, 07:19:53 PM
Hashing at 410-430 locally but only pulling about 330 on http://pool.cryptoescrow.eu/

Vardiff means that your hashrate at the pool may vary - you're still getting paid for your full hashrate, though.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: cisahasa on June 16, 2014, 07:31:12 PM
It didn't show my hashrate. Is it normal ?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/yc2p7zc8et3kupt/Capture.PNG

*facepaw* Okay, this is the LAST time I will answer this question. Yes, it is normal.

i have same issue, updated my VPS miners(60cores)
now none shows any hashrate, neither does pool= 0h/s
no single hash for hours
updating back to old miner..

Do they have AES-NI?

i dont think all of them have, chunkhost.com

Well, make sure that you're building the ones that don't with --disable-aes-ni, or they won't hash.


./autogen.sh
CFLAGS="-march=native"
./configure --disable-aes-ni
make

??? this?

No.

./autogen.sh
CFLAGS="-march=native" ./configure --disable-aes-ni
make


no help to me..
some of them hash very well
are they blocking mining now?
i can give u acces to one of the problem servers if u want to figure out what is the problem


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: Wolf0 on June 16, 2014, 07:33:35 PM
It didn't show my hashrate. Is it normal ?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/yc2p7zc8et3kupt/Capture.PNG

*facepaw* Okay, this is the LAST time I will answer this question. Yes, it is normal.

i have same issue, updated my VPS miners(60cores)
now none shows any hashrate, neither does pool= 0h/s
no single hash for hours
updating back to old miner..

Do they have AES-NI?

i dont think all of them have, chunkhost.com

Well, make sure that you're building the ones that don't with --disable-aes-ni, or they won't hash.


./autogen.sh
CFLAGS="-march=native"
./configure --disable-aes-ni
make

??? this?

No.

./autogen.sh
CFLAGS="-march=native" ./configure --disable-aes-ni
make


no help to me..
some of them hash very well
are they blocking mining now?
i can give u acces to one of the problem servers if u want to figure out what is the problem

Sorry - the non-AES-NI build isn't working. Use Lucas' for now, I need to fix it.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: spatula on June 16, 2014, 07:38:52 PM
I have a question, I noticed that even without an internet connection, the miner still uses 100% of my CPU on my Win7 64 box. What is it doing?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 16, 2014, 07:54:58 PM
I have a question, I noticed that even without an internet connection, the miner still uses 100% of my CPU on my Win7 64 box. What is it doing?

The worker threads don't stop just because it's not getting new work, and the workio thread can't get new work, so it doesn't notify the worker threads. So they happily generate new work from the stratum data they have and hash on, submitting good nonces to the workio thread, which is busy failing to connect to the pool.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: spatula on June 16, 2014, 08:11:56 PM
I have a question, I noticed that even without an internet connection, the miner still uses 100% of my CPU on my Win7 64 box. What is it doing?

The worker threads don't stop just because it's not getting new work, and the workio thread can't get new work, so it doesn't notify the worker threads. So they happily generate new work from the stratum data they have and hash on, submitting good nonces to the workio thread, which is busy failing to connect to the pool.

Ahh makes sense. I just know on my laptop, regular versions of minerd quit using cpu when there is no work available, so I would just leave the miner running if I had internet or not and not have to start and stop it. Not a big deal, but is there anyway to change this behavior?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 16, 2014, 08:36:54 PM
I have a question, I noticed that even without an internet connection, the miner still uses 100% of my CPU on my Win7 64 box. What is it doing?

The worker threads don't stop just because it's not getting new work, and the workio thread can't get new work, so it doesn't notify the worker threads. So they happily generate new work from the stratum data they have and hash on, submitting good nonces to the workio thread, which is busy failing to connect to the pool.

Ahh makes sense. I just know on my laptop, regular versions of minerd quit using cpu when there is no work available, so I would just leave the miner running if I had internet or not and not have to start and stop it. Not a big deal, but is there anyway to change this behavior?

The old minerd was likely using longpoll, meaning it would run out of work much faster. With Stratum, the miner can generate its own work, so probably not, unless you stop the miner threads on disconnection, and that would be bad because a lot of people have spotty internet connections, and resubmit found shares when they connect again.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: Agamemnus on June 17, 2014, 02:34:46 AM
I have a question, I noticed that even without an internet connection, the miner still uses 100% of my CPU on my Win7 64 box. What is it doing?

The worker threads don't stop just because it's not getting new work, and the workio thread can't get new work, so it doesn't notify the worker threads. So they happily generate new work from the stratum data they have and hash on, submitting good nonces to the workio thread, which is busy failing to connect to the pool.

Ahh makes sense. I just know on my laptop, regular versions of minerd quit using cpu when there is no work available, so I would just leave the miner running if I had internet or not and not have to start and stop it. Not a big deal, but is there anyway to change this behavior?

The old minerd was likely using longpoll, meaning it would run out of work much faster. With Stratum, the miner can generate its own work, so probably not, unless you stop the miner threads on disconnection, and that would be bad because a lot of people have spotty internet connections, and resubmit found shares when they connect again.

Yeah I've noticed with stratum before (not just this miner but others too) that if the connection lags out for a minute for whatever reason, it keeps working, then submits all it's hashes once the connection is re-established. PLEASE don't remove this ability!!!


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 17, 2014, 02:38:45 AM
I have a question, I noticed that even without an internet connection, the miner still uses 100% of my CPU on my Win7 64 box. What is it doing?

The worker threads don't stop just because it's not getting new work, and the workio thread can't get new work, so it doesn't notify the worker threads. So they happily generate new work from the stratum data they have and hash on, submitting good nonces to the workio thread, which is busy failing to connect to the pool.

Ahh makes sense. I just know on my laptop, regular versions of minerd quit using cpu when there is no work available, so I would just leave the miner running if I had internet or not and not have to start and stop it. Not a big deal, but is there anyway to change this behavior?

The old minerd was likely using longpoll, meaning it would run out of work much faster. With Stratum, the miner can generate its own work, so probably not, unless you stop the miner threads on disconnection, and that would be bad because a lot of people have spotty internet connections, and resubmit found shares when they connect again.

Yeah I've noticed with stratum before (not just this miner but others too) that if the connection lags out for a minute for whatever reason, it keeps working, then submits all it's hashes once the connection is re-established. PLEASE don't remove this ability!!!

Don't worry, I won't.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW WIN BINARY
Post by: 5w00p on June 17, 2014, 04:24:36 AM
It didn't show my hashrate. Is it normal ?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/yc2p7zc8et3kupta/Cpture.PNG

*facepaw* Okay, this is the LAST time I will answer this question. Yes, it is normal.

I can't believe no one else LMFAO'd at this *facePAW* .. i did :D


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: DemocraticRepublicOfDave on June 17, 2014, 11:28:49 AM
Hi there.

Just realized my AMD-FX processor has AES-NI.  Built and run the new miner and have more than doubled my hash rate.  ;D

Many thanks for the miner.  Will mine over the next 24 hours and will donate the difference.

Happy Miner.

Dave


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: xsoft on June 17, 2014, 12:38:50 PM
Helolo,
after 2h Im still unable to isntall this miner (on Linux, BAMT).

Code:
./install_monero.sh: line 194: cd: /root/monero: No such file or directory
Cloning into cpuminer-multi...
remote: Counting objects: 604, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (255/255), done.
remote: Total 604 (delta 351), reused 596 (delta 347)
Receiving objects: 100% (604/604), 446.11 KiB | 278 KiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (351/351), done.
~/cpuminer/cpuminer-multi ~/cpuminer
configure.ac:3: error: Autoconf version 2.68 or higher is required <-------------------------
configure.ac:3: the top level
autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 63
aclocal: autom4te failed with exit status: 63
./install_monero.sh: line 210: ./configure: No such file or directory
./install_monero.sh: line 214: [2: command not found
make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found.  Stop.
~/cpuminer
Finished building

If I change AC_PREREQ([2.68])  to AC_PREREQ([2.67])
and with

CFLAGS="-march=native" ./configure
make

ive go:
Code:
~/cpuminer/cpuminer-multi# make
make  all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/root/cpuminer/cpuminer-multi'
Making all in compat
make[2]: Entering directory `/root/cpuminer/cpuminer-multi/compat'
Making all in jansson
make[3]: Entering directory `/root/cpuminer/cpuminer-multi/compat/jansson'
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT dump.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/dump.Tpo -c -o dump.o dump.c
mv -f .deps/dump.Tpo .deps/dump.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT hashtable.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/hashtable.Tpo -c -o hashtable.o hashtable.c
mv -f .deps/hashtable.Tpo .deps/hashtable.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT load.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/load.Tpo -c -o load.o load.c
mv -f .deps/load.Tpo .deps/load.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT strbuffer.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/strbuffer.Tpo -c -o strbuffer.o strbuffer.c
mv -f .deps/strbuffer.Tpo .deps/strbuffer.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT utf.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/utf.Tpo -c -o utf.o utf.c
mv -f .deps/utf.Tpo .deps/utf.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT value.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/value.Tpo -c -o value.o value.c
mv -f .deps/value.Tpo .deps/value.Po
rm -f libjansson.a
ar cru libjansson.a dump.o hashtable.o load.o strbuffer.o utf.o value.o
ranlib libjansson.a
make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/cpuminer/cpuminer-multi/compat/jansson'
make[3]: Entering directory `/root/cpuminer/cpuminer-multi/compat'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/cpuminer/cpuminer-multi/compat'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/cpuminer/cpuminer-multi/compat'
make[2]: Entering directory `/root/cpuminer/cpuminer-multi'
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread -I./compat/jansson   -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16  -maes  -march=native -MT minerd-cpu-miner.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/minerd-cpu-miner.Tpo -c -o minerd-cpu-miner.o `test -f 'cpu-miner.c' || echo './'`cpu-miner.c
cc1: error: invalid option argument ‘-Ofast’
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-flto"
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-fuse-linker-plugin"
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-ftree-loop-if-convert-stores"
make[2]: *** [minerd-cpu-miner.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/cpuminer/cpuminer-multi'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/cpuminer/cpumin


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 17, 2014, 12:49:11 PM
Helolo,
after 2h Im still unable to isntall this miner (on Linux, BAMT).

Code:
./install_monero.sh: line 194: cd: /root/monero: No such file or directory
Cloning into cpuminer-multi...
remote: Counting objects: 604, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (255/255), done.
remote: Total 604 (delta 351), reused 596 (delta 347)
Receiving objects: 100% (604/604), 446.11 KiB | 278 KiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (351/351), done.
~/cpuminer/cpuminer-multi ~/cpuminer
configure.ac:3: error: Autoconf version 2.68 or higher is required <-------------------------
configure.ac:3: the top level
autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 63
aclocal: autom4te failed with exit status: 63
./install_monero.sh: line 210: ./configure: No such file or directory
./install_monero.sh: line 214: [2: command not found
make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found.  Stop.
~/cpuminer
Finished building

If I change AC_PREREQ([2.68])  to AC_PREREQ([2.67])
and with

CFLAGS="-march=native" ./configure
make

ive go:
Code:
~/cpuminer/cpuminer-multi# make
make  all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/root/cpuminer/cpuminer-multi'
Making all in compat
make[2]: Entering directory `/root/cpuminer/cpuminer-multi/compat'
Making all in jansson
make[3]: Entering directory `/root/cpuminer/cpuminer-multi/compat/jansson'
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT dump.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/dump.Tpo -c -o dump.o dump.c
mv -f .deps/dump.Tpo .deps/dump.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT hashtable.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/hashtable.Tpo -c -o hashtable.o hashtable.c
mv -f .deps/hashtable.Tpo .deps/hashtable.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT load.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/load.Tpo -c -o load.o load.c
mv -f .deps/load.Tpo .deps/load.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT strbuffer.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/strbuffer.Tpo -c -o strbuffer.o strbuffer.c
mv -f .deps/strbuffer.Tpo .deps/strbuffer.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT utf.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/utf.Tpo -c -o utf.o utf.c
mv -f .deps/utf.Tpo .deps/utf.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT value.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/value.Tpo -c -o value.o value.c
mv -f .deps/value.Tpo .deps/value.Po
rm -f libjansson.a
ar cru libjansson.a dump.o hashtable.o load.o strbuffer.o utf.o value.o
ranlib libjansson.a
make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/cpuminer/cpuminer-multi/compat/jansson'
make[3]: Entering directory `/root/cpuminer/cpuminer-multi/compat'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/cpuminer/cpuminer-multi/compat'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/cpuminer/cpuminer-multi/compat'
make[2]: Entering directory `/root/cpuminer/cpuminer-multi'
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread -I./compat/jansson   -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16  -maes  -march=native -MT minerd-cpu-miner.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/minerd-cpu-miner.Tpo -c -o minerd-cpu-miner.o `test -f 'cpu-miner.c' || echo './'`cpu-miner.c
cc1: error: invalid option argument ‘-Ofast’
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-flto"
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-fuse-linker-plugin"
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-ftree-loop-if-convert-stores"
make[2]: *** [minerd-cpu-miner.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/cpuminer/cpuminer-multi'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/cpuminer/cpumin

BAMT looks like it has old versions of everything. I'd avoid it like the plague.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: xsoft on June 17, 2014, 01:18:44 PM
Well, on Centos 6.4 I havent been much success either.

Code:
[root@xxx cpuminer-multi]# make
make  all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/srv/scripts/btc-test1/cpuminer-multi'
Making all in compat
make[2]: Entering directory `/srv/scripts/btc-test1/cpuminer-multi/compat'
Making all in jansson
make[3]: Entering directory `/srv/scripts/btc-test1/cpuminer-multi/compat/jansson'
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT dump.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/dump.Tpo -c -o dump.o dump.c
mv -f .deps/dump.Tpo .deps/dump.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT hashtable.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/hashtable.Tpo -c -o hashtable.o hashtable.c
mv -f .deps/hashtable.Tpo .deps/hashtable.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT load.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/load.Tpo -c -o load.o load.c
mv -f .deps/load.Tpo .deps/load.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT strbuffer.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/strbuffer.Tpo -c -o strbuffer.o strbuffer.c
mv -f .deps/strbuffer.Tpo .deps/strbuffer.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT utf.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/utf.Tpo -c -o utf.o utf.c
mv -f .deps/utf.Tpo .deps/utf.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT value.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/value.Tpo -c -o value.o value.c
mv -f .deps/value.Tpo .deps/value.Po
rm -f libjansson.a
ar cru libjansson.a dump.o hashtable.o load.o strbuffer.o utf.o value.o
ranlib libjansson.a
make[3]: Leaving directory `/srv/scripts/btc-test1/cpuminer-multi/compat/jansson'
make[3]: Entering directory `/srv/scripts/btc-test1/cpuminer-multi/compat'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/srv/scripts/btc-test1/cpuminer-multi/compat'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/srv/scripts/btc-test1/cpuminer-multi/compat'
make[2]: Entering directory `/srv/scripts/btc-test1/cpuminer-multi'
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread -I./compat/jansson   -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16  -maes  -march=native -MT minerd-cpu-miner.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/minerd-cpu-miner.Tpo -c -o minerd-cpu-miner.o `test -f 'cpu-miner.c' || echo './'`cpu-miner.c
cc1: error: invalid option argument ‘-Ofast’
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-flto"
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-fuse-linker-plugin"
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-ftree-loop-if-convert-stores"
make[2]: *** [minerd-cpu-miner.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/srv/scripts/btc-test1/cpuminer-multi'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/srv/scripts/btc-test1/cpuminer-multi'
make: *** [all] Error 2


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: onemorebtc on June 17, 2014, 01:47:15 PM
Well, on Centos 6.4 I havent been much success either.

Code:
[root@xxx cpuminer-multi]# make
make  all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/srv/scripts/btc-test1/cpuminer-multi'
Making all in compat
make[2]: Entering directory `/srv/scripts/btc-test1/cpuminer-multi/compat'
Making all in jansson
make[3]: Entering directory `/srv/scripts/btc-test1/cpuminer-multi/compat/jansson'
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT dump.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/dump.Tpo -c -o dump.o dump.c
mv -f .deps/dump.Tpo .deps/dump.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT hashtable.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/hashtable.Tpo -c -o hashtable.o hashtable.c
mv -f .deps/hashtable.Tpo .deps/hashtable.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT load.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/load.Tpo -c -o load.o load.c
mv -f .deps/load.Tpo .deps/load.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT strbuffer.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/strbuffer.Tpo -c -o strbuffer.o strbuffer.c
mv -f .deps/strbuffer.Tpo .deps/strbuffer.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT utf.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/utf.Tpo -c -o utf.o utf.c
mv -f .deps/utf.Tpo .deps/utf.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT value.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/value.Tpo -c -o value.o value.c
mv -f .deps/value.Tpo .deps/value.Po
rm -f libjansson.a
ar cru libjansson.a dump.o hashtable.o load.o strbuffer.o utf.o value.o
ranlib libjansson.a
make[3]: Leaving directory `/srv/scripts/btc-test1/cpuminer-multi/compat/jansson'
make[3]: Entering directory `/srv/scripts/btc-test1/cpuminer-multi/compat'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/srv/scripts/btc-test1/cpuminer-multi/compat'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/srv/scripts/btc-test1/cpuminer-multi/compat'
make[2]: Entering directory `/srv/scripts/btc-test1/cpuminer-multi'
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread -I./compat/jansson   -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16  -maes  -march=native -MT minerd-cpu-miner.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/minerd-cpu-miner.Tpo -c -o minerd-cpu-miner.o `test -f 'cpu-miner.c' || echo './'`cpu-miner.c
cc1: error: invalid option argument ‘-Ofast’
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-flto"
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-fuse-linker-plugin"
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-ftree-loop-if-convert-stores"
make[2]: *** [minerd-cpu-miner.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/srv/scripts/btc-test1/cpuminer-multi'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/srv/scripts/btc-test1/cpuminer-multi'
make: *** [all] Error 2

which gcc version are you using?
you can try to remove -flto, -fuse-linker-plugin and -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores from makefile

edit --enable-lto must be used while building gcc>4.6. maybe your distro doesnt or has an extra gxx-lto package


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: xsoft on June 17, 2014, 04:09:23 PM
which gcc version are you using?
you can try to remove -flto, -fuse-linker-plugin and -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores from makefile

edit --enable-lto must be used while building gcc>4.6. maybe your distro doesnt or has an extra gxx-lto package

gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread -I./compat/jansson   -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16  -maes  -march=native -MT minerd-cpu-miner.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/minerd-cpu-miner.Tpo -c -o minerd-cpu-miner.o `test -f 'cpu-miner.c' --enable-lto || echo './'`cpu-miner.c
bash: test: cpu-miner.c: binary operator expected
./cpu-miner.c: In function ‘miner_thread’:
./cpu-miner.c:1065: error: ‘MADV_HUGEPAGE’ undeclared (first use in this function)
./cpu-miner.c:1065: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
./cpu-miner.c:1065: error: for each function it appears in.)



gcc version 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-4) (GCC)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 17, 2014, 04:44:21 PM
which gcc version are you using?
you can try to remove -flto, -fuse-linker-plugin and -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores from makefile

edit --enable-lto must be used while building gcc>4.6. maybe your distro doesnt or has an extra gxx-lto package

gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread -I./compat/jansson   -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16  -maes  -march=native -MT minerd-cpu-miner.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/minerd-cpu-miner.Tpo -c -o minerd-cpu-miner.o `test -f 'cpu-miner.c' --enable-lto || echo './'`cpu-miner.c
bash: test: cpu-miner.c: binary operator expected
./cpu-miner.c: In function ‘miner_thread’:
./cpu-miner.c:1065: error: ‘MADV_HUGEPAGE’ undeclared (first use in this function)
./cpu-miner.c:1065: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
./cpu-miner.c:1065: error: for each function it appears in.)



gcc version 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-4) (GCC)

GCC 4.4.7 is ancient. Use 4.8.0 or better. That's a known issue on FreeBSD, dunno why it's showing up on Red Hat...


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: pepi on June 18, 2014, 08:13:15 AM
Will you compile new version for windows and Linux static?
Thanks!


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 18, 2014, 08:17:47 AM
Will you compile new version for windows and Linux static?
Thanks!

I reverted the commit - it messed some stuff up. But why would you want a linux static binary?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: pepi on June 18, 2014, 08:30:01 AM
Will you compile new version for windows and Linux static?
Thanks!

I reverted the commit - it messed some stuff up. But why would you want a linux static binary?

Why?
Because you dont need to know how to compile binaries if you are on linux, simple reason.
I take static binaries, lost maybe one percent( if at all) and working immediately :)
And for somebody who know how to make static it is few minutes of work.. Put it on the cloud and give link :)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: HardwarePal on June 18, 2014, 09:21:01 AM
Any links to Lucas software for NON AES-NI for windows other then the github?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 18, 2014, 09:24:48 AM
Any links to Lucas software for NON AES-NI for windows other then the github?


Why? What's wrong with the github?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: HardwarePal on June 18, 2014, 09:25:43 AM
EDIT : Im an idiot found it thanks


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 18, 2014, 09:29:55 AM
Em ... Im a newb on that :(

No, I mean, I think there are Windows binaries on the github.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: HardwarePal on June 18, 2014, 09:31:21 AM
Thanks edited previous post sorry Wolf


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: azhago on June 18, 2014, 05:28:30 PM
mining with this miner on minergate doesn't work (not on merge mining of course)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: bitspender on June 18, 2014, 05:50:51 PM
I have this miner running on multiple servers.
However, i have one server (exatcly the same) that does NOT show any threads or hashes.

Any idea how comes?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: AceCobra1 on June 18, 2014, 06:11:06 PM
Just a quick check and I am getting roughly 220 KH/s with my QA82 ES Xeon processor with 12 GB of RAM... would more RAM make any difference?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: bitspender on June 18, 2014, 06:40:26 PM
Another question, i'm running multiple VPS.

When i use on Ubuntu, i get around 100 H/s
On the same hardware, but running windows image, i get 280 ??


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: Alpinist on June 18, 2014, 07:37:46 PM
Can I run this miner to merge mine on Minergate?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 18, 2014, 08:41:16 PM
Just a quick check and I am getting roughly 220 KH/s with my QA82 ES Xeon processor with 12 GB of RAM... would more RAM make any difference?

No, but try a different number of threads.

Can I run this miner to merge mine on Minergate?


Yes.

Another question, i'm running multiple VPS.

When i use on Ubuntu, i get around 100 H/s
On the same hardware, but running windows image, i get 280 ??

You're probably forgetting hugepages.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: Alpinist on June 18, 2014, 09:23:06 PM
What .bat should I write to merge mine on MinerGate?
Did somebody do that?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 18, 2014, 09:29:43 PM
What .bat should I write to merge mine on MinerGate?
Did somebody do that?

The Fantomcoin website has instructions, I think.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: AceCobra1 on June 18, 2014, 09:43:43 PM
Just a quick check and I am getting roughly 220 KH/s with my QA82 ES Xeon processor with 12 GB of RAM... would more RAM make any difference?

No, but try a different number of threads.

Can I run this miner to merge mine on Minergate?


Yes.

Another question, i'm running multiple VPS.

When i use on Ubuntu, i get around 100 H/s
On the same hardware, but running windows image, i get 280 ??

You're probably forgetting hugepages.

Mining with 9 threads for some reason produces 284 hash compared to say 16.... why would that be the case? Take it hyperthreading makes no difference? Also, in your front page, you said the Amazon EC2 manages 1.2KH/s.... which CPUs would those be ?!?!


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 18, 2014, 09:45:48 PM
Just a quick check and I am getting roughly 220 KH/s with my QA82 ES Xeon processor with 12 GB of RAM... would more RAM make any difference?

No, but try a different number of threads.

Can I run this miner to merge mine on Minergate?


Yes.

Another question, i'm running multiple VPS.

When i use on Ubuntu, i get around 100 H/s
On the same hardware, but running windows image, i get 280 ??

You're probably forgetting hugepages.

Mining with 9 threads for some reason produces 284 hash compared to say 16.... why would that be the case? Take it hyperthreading makes no difference? Also, in your front page, you said the Amazon EC2 manages 1.2KH/s.... which CPUs would those be ?!?!

Hyperthreading is pretty much useless here. Yep, and those are dual Xeons that cost $6500+ each.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: AceCobra1 on June 18, 2014, 09:55:30 PM
Just a quick check and I am getting roughly 220 KH/s with my QA82 ES Xeon processor with 12 GB of RAM... would more RAM make any difference?

No, but try a different number of threads.

Can I run this miner to merge mine on Minergate?


Yes.

Another question, i'm running multiple VPS.

When i use on Ubuntu, i get around 100 H/s
On the same hardware, but running windows image, i get 280 ??

You're probably forgetting hugepages.

Mining with 9 threads for some reason produces 284 hash compared to say 16.... why would that be the case? Take it hyperthreading makes no difference? Also, in your front page, you said the Amazon EC2 manages 1.2KH/s.... which CPUs would those be ?!?!

Hyperthreading is pretty much useless here. Yep, and those are dual Xeons that cost $6500+ each.

Crazy - Any ideas what type of speed I should be expecting from the E5 2650 ES ?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: equipoise on June 18, 2014, 10:14:47 PM
^https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MI-ic0Os25hgGUImW54sUIjZY_pUNQNa_W8Se5pRGBs/edit#gid=0 (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MI-ic0Os25hgGUImW54sUIjZY_pUNQNa_W8Se5pRGBs/edit#gid=0)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: bitspender on June 19, 2014, 07:31:10 AM
Just a quick check and I am getting roughly 220 KH/s with my QA82 ES Xeon processor with 12 GB of RAM... would more RAM make any difference?

No, but try a different number of threads.

Can I run this miner to merge mine on Minergate?


Yes.

Another question, i'm running multiple VPS.

When i use on Ubuntu, i get around 100 H/s
On the same hardware, but running windows image, i get 280 ??

You're probably forgetting hugepages.

You mean??


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 19, 2014, 07:35:56 AM
Just a quick check and I am getting roughly 220 KH/s with my QA82 ES Xeon processor with 12 GB of RAM... would more RAM make any difference?

No, but try a different number of threads.

Can I run this miner to merge mine on Minergate?


Yes.

Another question, i'm running multiple VPS.

When i use on Ubuntu, i get around 100 H/s
On the same hardware, but running windows image, i get 280 ??

You're probably forgetting hugepages.

You mean??

I mean read the OP.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: bitspender on June 19, 2014, 07:36:42 AM
Look, all the same builds, all the same servers.
Yet huge difference in hashrate??

http://i.imgur.com/TvrSIeq.png


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 19, 2014, 07:39:36 AM
Look, all the same builds, all the same servers.
Yet huge difference in hashrate??

http://i.imgur.com/TvrSIeq.png

I asked if you followed the instructions for hugepage setup on linux - you haven't given me a reply.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: bitspender on June 19, 2014, 07:41:01 AM
Look, all the same builds, all the same servers.
Yet huge difference in hashrate??

http://i.imgur.com/TvrSIeq.png

I asked if you followed the instructions for hugepage setup on linux - you haven't given me a reply.

Yes i did follow those instructions


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 19, 2014, 07:47:04 AM
Look, all the same builds, all the same servers.
Yet huge difference in hashrate??

http://i.imgur.com/TvrSIeq.png

I asked if you followed the instructions for hugepage setup on linux - you haven't given me a reply.

Yes i did follow those instructions

Wait - those aren't the same servers, they're servers with the same specs. The reason this matters is that the other one could be different in some way, or being throttled. Plenty of VPS services will throttle you if you use too much CPU, or your CPU speed will suck if someone else is using too much CPU. Also, I did say that the hugepages edits probably wouldn't help under virtualization.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: bitspender on June 19, 2014, 07:52:33 AM
Allright thank you for the reply.
I'll see what i can do, sometimes rebuilding with other CFLAGS seems to help, so i'll search what suits the best


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: AceCobra1 on June 19, 2014, 12:13:55 PM
Is this bat file about right or is it too simple:

minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://monero.crypto-pool.fr:6666 -u ADDRESS -p x -t 8

Are there any furthur codes I can put in to get any extra performance? I am only hashing around 250 - 280 on a E5-2650 ES QA82 which I thought is rather disappointing considering one of the guys on here is hashing over 400 on a E3-1230!


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: equipoise on June 19, 2014, 12:17:46 PM
^It seems the Wolf's miner is faster on linux.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 19, 2014, 12:18:06 PM
Is this bat file about right or is it too simple:

minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://monero.crypto-pool.fr:6666 -u ADDRESS -p x -t 8

Are there any furthur codes I can put in to get any extra performance? I am only hashing around 250 - 280 on a E5-2650 ES QA82 which I thought is rather disappointing considering one of the guys on here is hashing over 400 on a E3-1230!

First, you need to try a different number of threads. Try 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. Second, mine on my pool  :D


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: xxnirvana69xx on June 19, 2014, 01:53:17 PM
^It seems the Wolf's miner is faster on linux.

Yep! Went from 305H/s on Win7x64 to 440H/s on Ubuntu64.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: AceCobra1 on June 19, 2014, 02:27:32 PM
^It seems the Wolf's miner is faster on linux.

Yep! Went from 305H/s on Win7x64 to 440H/s on Ubuntu64.

Just looking at youtube videos on how to install Ubuntu - is it complicated to run the software on it or is it just like windows? Whats GPU mining like on it? Is it more stable etc. ?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 19, 2014, 02:37:56 PM
^It seems the Wolf's miner is faster on linux.

Yep! Went from 305H/s on Win7x64 to 440H/s on Ubuntu64.

Just looking at youtube videos on how to install Ubuntu - is it complicated to run the software on it or is it just like windows? Whats GPU mining like on it? Is it more stable etc. ?

No, it isn't just like Windows, although it's not very complex. You can't GPU mine on it as of yet, as Claymore's miner doesn't support linux - however GPU mining in general tends to be more stable in my experience.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/17/2014
Post by: pepi on June 19, 2014, 02:39:43 PM
^It seems the Wolf's miner is faster on linux.

Yep! Went from 305H/s on Win7x64 to 440H/s on Ubuntu64.

Just looking at youtube videos on how to install Ubuntu - is it complicated to run the software on it or is it just like windows? Whats GPU mining like on it? Is it more stable etc. ?

There is no GPU mining under Linux for XMR/BCN/MNT


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/19/2014
Post by: tc61 on June 20, 2014, 02:30:40 AM
When writing the batch file to start the miner, how do you specify the number of core, like if I wanted to only use 2.

Thx


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/19/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 20, 2014, 02:35:47 AM
When writing the batch file to start the miner, how do you specify the number of core, like if I wanted to only use 2.

Thx
-t 2

Read the --help next time.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/19/2014
Post by: tc61 on June 20, 2014, 02:38:07 AM
wolf, looked for a help readme but could not find one..thanks for the info.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/19/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 20, 2014, 02:43:20 AM
wolf, looked for a help readme but could not find one..thanks for the info.

No problem... maybe I should include a readme or something.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/19/2014
Post by: MadGhost on June 20, 2014, 02:46:05 AM
wolf, looked for a help readme but could not find one..thanks for the info.

No problem... maybe I should include a readme or something.

readme would be helpful for the first time users, also the ones who are new to mining.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/19/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 20, 2014, 02:48:30 AM
wolf, looked for a help readme but could not find one..thanks for the info.

No problem... maybe I should include a readme or something.

readme would be helpful for the first time users, also the ones who are new to mining.

Yeah. Also would be helpful for users just new to this miner - that way they could look at the readme and know how to setup hugepages on linux, rather than having to come to this thread.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/19/2014
Post by: tc61 on June 20, 2014, 03:48:42 AM
wolf, another quick question, I was trying to run the miner, while still doing some gpu mining , but when I do so, the % of good hash on the gpu miner starts to take a hit. I even tried just using 1 thread out of the 4 but it still degrades the gpu miner performance, any tips?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/19/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 20, 2014, 03:54:07 AM
wolf, another quick question, I was trying to run the miner, while still doing some gpu mining , but when I do so, the % of good hash on the gpu miner starts to take a hit. I even tried just using 1 thread out of the 4 but it still degrades the gpu miner performance, any tips?

Hm... try lowering the priority of the CPU miner and/or raising the priority of the GPU miner in Task Manager. Whatever you do, do NOT use the "Realtime" setting - it always locked my systems up.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/19/2014
Post by: tc61 on June 20, 2014, 04:58:20 AM
wolf, another quick question, I was trying to run the miner, while still doing some gpu mining , but when I do so, the % of good hash on the gpu miner starts to take a hit. I even tried just using 1 thread out of the 4 but it still degrades the gpu miner performance, any tips?

Hm... try lowering the priority of the CPU miner and/or raising the priority of the GPU miner in Task Manager. Whatever you do, do NOT use the "Realtime" setting - it always locked my systems up.

Figured it out, I had to set the affinity of processor to not steal from each other


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/19/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 20, 2014, 05:03:07 AM
wolf, another quick question, I was trying to run the miner, while still doing some gpu mining , but when I do so, the % of good hash on the gpu miner starts to take a hit. I even tried just using 1 thread out of the 4 but it still degrades the gpu miner performance, any tips?

Hm... try lowering the priority of the CPU miner and/or raising the priority of the GPU miner in Task Manager. Whatever you do, do NOT use the "Realtime" setting - it always locked my systems up.

Figured it out, I had to set the affinity of processor to not steal from each other

Interesting how that works - I disabled setting affinity (it was only ever done when the number of threads is a multiple of the number of CPU cores) because it lowered hashrate a lot on servers, especially AWS.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: ivanlabrie on June 20, 2014, 12:28:11 PM
Wolf0, I've ran folding at home using alinux VM before (virtual box) and it ran like native Linux on the CPU side of things.

you could make a prebuilt mining is image for windows users to mine with. Might get you some extra tips too
what do you think?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 20, 2014, 12:33:27 PM
Wolf0, I've ran folding at home using alinux VM before (virtual box) and it ran like native Linux on the CPU side of things.

you could make a prebuilt mining is image for windows users to mine with. Might get you some extra tips too
what do you think?

I think you missed the part in the OP where I said it can't be virtualized. Gotta be native.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: tequillaquagga on June 20, 2014, 02:11:16 PM
Have someone compiled it on OSX?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 20, 2014, 02:28:04 PM
Have someone compiled it on OSX?

I think sammy007 on IRC has.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: sparks2013 on June 20, 2014, 03:43:51 PM
Hello all,

Has anyone successfully compiled Wolfs cpuminer under centOS 6.4?

I tried for a couple hours yesterday to make it work, and even removed some of the values under the makefile but can't seem to get it to compile.

I'm stuck on this error..

./cpu-miner.c:1065: error: ‘MADV_HUGEPAGE’ undeclared (first use in this function)
./cpu-miner.c:1065: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
./cpu-miner.c:1065: error: for each function it appears in.)

Any help would be greatly appreciated!


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 20, 2014, 03:47:51 PM
Hello all,

Has anyone successfully compiled Wolfs cpuminer under centOS 6.4?

I tried for a couple hours yesterday to make it work, and even removed some of the values under the makefile but can't seem to get it to compile.

I'm stuck on this error..

./cpu-miner.c:1065: error: ‘MADV_HUGEPAGE’ undeclared (first use in this function)
./cpu-miner.c:1065: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
./cpu-miner.c:1065: error: for each function it appears in.)

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

CentOS apparently doesn't support hugepages - which sucks, because that's a lot of performance.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: AceCobra1 on June 21, 2014, 12:07:46 AM
Any updated miners ? The GPU now seems to have a massive advantage over CPUs now on monero


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: smooth on June 21, 2014, 02:46:41 AM
Any updated miners ? The GPU now seems to have a massive advantage over CPUs now on monero

Massive advantage how? Claymore reports 600 H/s on a 290x, which is about double what you get on a fast desktop CPU, but it also costs about twice as much. I see no major advantage to GPUs at this point, they are just another reasonable option.



Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 21, 2014, 02:54:39 PM
Any updated miners ? The GPU now seems to have a massive advantage over CPUs now on monero

GPUs don't have a massive advantage yet - and when they do, there will be nothing I can do about it, seeing as GPUs are just better at this sort of thing.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: azhago on June 21, 2014, 07:58:36 PM
Any updated miners ? The GPU now seems to have a massive advantage over CPUs now on monero

Massive advantage how? Claymore reports 600 H/s on a 290x, which is about double what you get on a fast desktop CPU, but it also costs about twice as much. I see no major advantage to GPUs at this point, they are just another reasonable option.


A 280x do ~400H/s
If you are a miner, you surely have one or more rigs, with several GPUs on each.
Having multiple CPU is a bit more complicated/expensive.

My rig with 5 280X perform @ 2300H/s
My dual xeon 2687w do ~740H/s with Wolf cpu miner and cost a lot more than the rig


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: smooth on June 22, 2014, 01:09:37 AM
My rig with 5 280X perform @ 2300H/s
My dual xeon 2687w do ~740H/s with Wolf cpu miner and cost a lot more than the rig

DP xeons are really, really expensive compared to desktop CPUs. I don't know the most efficient recipe for a CPU mining rig, but that's certainly not it. Also consider power usage. The most power hungry CPUs are 130W, most are less. Every high end GPU is higher.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: azhago on June 22, 2014, 08:11:07 AM
If you consider cpu mining, you should consider the whole PC consumption, not just CPU.
Making a "traditional" desktop computer with a 4770K will cost more thant a GPU.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Agamemnus on June 22, 2014, 08:49:10 AM
If you consider cpu mining, you should consider the whole PC consumption, not just CPU.
Making a "traditional" desktop computer with a 4770K will cost more thant a GPU.

You're thinking from a single minded perspective. You are actually seeing the INTENTIONAL limitation of this algorithm.

My kids have a 2500k each and they get 110H/s when the CPU is at 50% the whole time they're on it. They use this miner in Windows. Measured AT THE WALL the power consumption goes up by 30w when the miner starts if the PC was at idle, when I have Hearthstone running in window mode, it is only going up by 20w with the miner.

So effectively, regular crappy $300 computers that I bought for my kids are getting me 110H/s for somewhere between 20w and 30w depending on what they're doing. An R9 280x draws around 300w from the wall at full power, if Claymore's miner is only using half their power, it would be 150w.

To break even in H/s you'd need to be getting closer to 660H/s per card, your results show 460 per card.

This means that people can't just buy a crap tonne of equipment and own the coin. It was intentionally made to be this way.

EDIT: Forgot to mention that the kids don't think it affects their gameplay. They play mostly Hearthstone, Path of Exile, Diablo 3, League of Legends and DotA 2.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: smooth on June 22, 2014, 09:04:04 AM
If you consider cpu mining, you should consider the whole PC consumption, not just CPU.
Making a "traditional" desktop computer with a 4770K will cost more thant a GPU.

You're thinking from a single minded perspective. You are actually seeing the INTENTIONAL limitation of this algorithm.

My kids have a 2500k each and they get 110H/s when the CPU is at 50% the whole time they're on it. They use this miner in Windows. Measured AT THE WALL the power consumption goes up by 30w when the miner starts if the PC was at idle, when I have Hearthstone running in window mode, it is only going up by 20w with the miner.

So effectively, regular crappy $300 computers that I bought for my kids are getting me 110H/s for somewhere between 20w and 30w depending on what they're doing. An R9 280x draws around 300w from the wall at full power, if Claymore's miner is only using half their power, it would be 150w.

To break even in H/s you'd need to be getting closer to 660H/s per card, your results show 460 per card.

This means that people can't just buy a crap tonne of equipment and own the coin. It was intentionally made to be this way.

EDIT: Forgot to mention that the kids don't think it affects their gameplay. They play mostly Hearthstone, Path of Exile, Diablo 3, League of Legends and DotA 2.

Well said. As I have explained before, there is a role for GPU mining, which is why I am currently the largest individual contributor to the bounty for an open source GPU miner. However, GPU mining is not dominant for this algorithm the way it is for most others, merely competitive (as you correctly explain, by design).



Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: dewdeded on June 22, 2014, 02:38:03 PM
How to compile under OS X.

1.) ./autogen.sh
2.) ./configure CFLAGS="-march=native -mno-avx"
3.) edit Makefile, search string "-fuse-linker-plugin", delete this string/option from the "AM_CFLAGS" setting
(e.g. "AM_CFLAGS = -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops \" becomes "AM_CFLAGS = -Ofast -flto -funroll-loops \")
4.) make
5.) ???
6.) mine monero, take money, get bitches
7.) profit!



Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: AceCobra1 on June 22, 2014, 05:08:52 PM
What is the stratum for moneropool.com ?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Casu on June 22, 2014, 05:53:30 PM
What is the stratum for moneropool.com ?

How about mining on a different pool? They took it off the site for a reason.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: 3xpl0r3r on June 22, 2014, 08:29:22 PM
I keep getting "Stratum authentication failed....retry in 10 secs.  Anybody around??  On xmr pool


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: 5w00p on June 22, 2014, 08:34:13 PM
I keep getting "Stratum authentication failed....retry in 10 secs.  Anybody around??  On xmr pool

There are some pool(s) that got DDOS'd.

Use wolf's pool, it is up and only 1% fee.

http://pool.cryptoescrow.eu/

Sample code to run minerd: minerd -o stratum+tcp://mine.cryptoescrow.eu:3333 -u YOUR-WALLET-ADDRESS -p x -t 4


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: 3xpl0r3r on June 22, 2014, 08:37:32 PM
Already doing that.  Must be something on my end.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: azhago on June 23, 2014, 12:43:00 AM
If you consider cpu mining, you should consider the whole PC consumption, not just CPU.
Making a "traditional" desktop computer with a 4770K will cost more thant a GPU.

You're thinking from a single minded perspective. You are actually seeing the INTENTIONAL limitation of this algorithm.

My kids have a 2500k each and they get 110H/s when the CPU is at 50% the whole time they're on it. They use this miner in Windows. Measured AT THE WALL the power consumption goes up by 30w when the miner starts if the PC was at idle, when I have Hearthstone running in window mode, it is only going up by 20w with the miner.

So effectively, regular crappy $300 computers that I bought for my kids are getting me 110H/s for somewhere between 20w and 30w depending on what they're doing. An R9 280x draws around 300w from the wall at full power, if Claymore's miner is only using half their power, it would be 150w.

To break even in H/s you'd need to be getting closer to 660H/s per card, your results show 460 per card.

This means that people can't just buy a crap tonne of equipment and own the coin. It was intentionally made to be this way.

EDIT: Forgot to mention that the kids don't think it affects their gameplay. They play mostly Hearthstone, Path of Exile, Diablo 3, League of Legends and DotA 2.

The cryptonight algo was not designed to be more cpu friendly than gpu friendly. It is more cpu friendly actually.
I'm not complaining, i have some cpu at home (a dual xeon 2687w and a 3930K@4.8GHz) - i'm not pro or against cpu mining. I have a few gpu and some cpu.
But juste mesuring the difference when mining with cpu compared to when your kids computer are not mining is not, well, a good measure.
Such a computer while mining should draw ~250W (mesured at the wall). Maybe i'm wrong, i'll let you make the measure.
A simple rig designed for mining with gpu, with a little cpu (ga2016/2020), in iddle state, draw 80w, and when mining XMR with one R9 280X, draw 250W.
With the 5 R9 280X, 2300H/s, 1000W measured at the wall.
OK, my dual xeon give me 960H/s for less power, but i think we will see a lot of optimization (for both i hope) in a near future.

Quote
This means that people can't just buy a crap tonne of equipment and own the coin. It was intentionally made to be this way.
Why do you think it was designed intentionally in this way ? To be fair ?
Gpu friendly coin bring gpu farm and multipool, cpu only or cpu friendly bring botnet/amazon EC2 instances (see the boolberry thread, DGA talk about 200 EC2 for himself, and he is far from being the biggest one). In both case i'm still a very little miner

EDIT :
GPU miner coming to nvidia card (not released yet)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.msg7458872#msg7458872

First test, with 6 x 750Ti : 270W at the wall (something like 35w per card), ~160H/s per cards


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: AceCobra1 on June 23, 2014, 12:43:11 PM
If you consider cpu mining, you should consider the whole PC consumption, not just CPU.
Making a "traditional" desktop computer with a 4770K will cost more thant a GPU.

You're thinking from a single minded perspective. You are actually seeing the INTENTIONAL limitation of this algorithm.

My kids have a 2500k each and they get 110H/s when the CPU is at 50% the whole time they're on it. They use this miner in Windows. Measured AT THE WALL the power consumption goes up by 30w when the miner starts if the PC was at idle, when I have Hearthstone running in window mode, it is only going up by 20w with the miner.

So effectively, regular crappy $300 computers that I bought for my kids are getting me 110H/s for somewhere between 20w and 30w depending on what they're doing. An R9 280x draws around 300w from the wall at full power, if Claymore's miner is only using half their power, it would be 150w.

To break even in H/s you'd need to be getting closer to 660H/s per card, your results show 460 per card.

This means that people can't just buy a crap tonne of equipment and own the coin. It was intentionally made to be this way.

EDIT: Forgot to mention that the kids don't think it affects their gameplay. They play mostly Hearthstone, Path of Exile, Diablo 3, League of Legends and DotA 2.

The cryptonight algo was not designed to be more cpu friendly than gpu friendly. It is more cpu friendly actually.
I'm not complaining, i have some cpu at home (a dual xeon 2687w and a 3930K@4.8GHz) - i'm not pro or against cpu mining. I have a few gpu and some cpu.
But juste mesuring the difference when mining with cpu compared to when your kids computer are not mining is not, well, a good measure.
Such a computer while mining should draw ~250W (mesured at the wall). Maybe i'm wrong, i'll let you make the measure.
A simple rig designed for mining with gpu, with a little cpu (ga2016/2020), in iddle state, draw 80w, and when mining XMR with one R9 280X, draw 250W.
With the 5 R9 280X, 2300H/s, 1000W measured at the wall.
OK, my dual xeon give me 960H/s for less power, but i think we will see a lot of optimization (for both i hope) in a near future.

Quote
This means that people can't just buy a crap tonne of equipment and own the coin. It was intentionally made to be this way.
Why do you think it was designed intentionally in this way ? To be fair ?
Gpu friendly coin bring gpu farm and multipool, cpu only or cpu friendly bring botnet/amazon EC2 instances (see the boolberry thread, DGA talk about 200 EC2 for himself, and he is far from being the biggest one). In both case i'm still a very little miner

EDIT :
GPU miner coming to nvidia card (not released yet)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.msg7458872#msg7458872

First test, with 6 x 750Ti : 270W at the wall (something like 35w per card), ~160H/s per cards

I think your estimations of the power draw is incorect. I have 3 rigs + my desktop attached to my single socket with these power usage meter things... I have 1 x 280x, 3 x 7970, 7 x 7950 and 1 x 7950 with 1 x 750ti and 1x 650GTX and using my overclocked 2500k to mine, total power draw is 1550 to 1650w from the wall...


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 24, 2014, 06:22:35 AM
If you consider cpu mining, you should consider the whole PC consumption, not just CPU.
Making a "traditional" desktop computer with a 4770K will cost more thant a GPU.

You're thinking from a single minded perspective. You are actually seeing the INTENTIONAL limitation of this algorithm.

My kids have a 2500k each and they get 110H/s when the CPU is at 50% the whole time they're on it. They use this miner in Windows. Measured AT THE WALL the power consumption goes up by 30w when the miner starts if the PC was at idle, when I have Hearthstone running in window mode, it is only going up by 20w with the miner.

So effectively, regular crappy $300 computers that I bought for my kids are getting me 110H/s for somewhere between 20w and 30w depending on what they're doing. An R9 280x draws around 300w from the wall at full power, if Claymore's miner is only using half their power, it would be 150w.

To break even in H/s you'd need to be getting closer to 660H/s per card, your results show 460 per card.

This means that people can't just buy a crap tonne of equipment and own the coin. It was intentionally made to be this way.

EDIT: Forgot to mention that the kids don't think it affects their gameplay. They play mostly Hearthstone, Path of Exile, Diablo 3, League of Legends and DotA 2.

The cryptonight algo was not designed to be more cpu friendly than gpu friendly. It is more cpu friendly actually.
I'm not complaining, i have some cpu at home (a dual xeon 2687w and a 3930K@4.8GHz) - i'm not pro or against cpu mining. I have a few gpu and some cpu.
But juste mesuring the difference when mining with cpu compared to when your kids computer are not mining is not, well, a good measure.
Such a computer while mining should draw ~250W (mesured at the wall). Maybe i'm wrong, i'll let you make the measure.
A simple rig designed for mining with gpu, with a little cpu (ga2016/2020), in iddle state, draw 80w, and when mining XMR with one R9 280X, draw 250W.
With the 5 R9 280X, 2300H/s, 1000W measured at the wall.
OK, my dual xeon give me 960H/s for less power, but i think we will see a lot of optimization (for both i hope) in a near future.

Quote
This means that people can't just buy a crap tonne of equipment and own the coin. It was intentionally made to be this way.
Why do you think it was designed intentionally in this way ? To be fair ?
Gpu friendly coin bring gpu farm and multipool, cpu only or cpu friendly bring botnet/amazon EC2 instances (see the boolberry thread, DGA talk about 200 EC2 for himself, and he is far from being the biggest one). In both case i'm still a very little miner

EDIT :
GPU miner coming to nvidia card (not released yet)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.msg7458872#msg7458872

First test, with 6 x 750Ti : 270W at the wall (something like 35w per card), ~160H/s per cards

It's not released, and it's not going to be released. Trust me.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Onicle on June 24, 2014, 08:29:05 AM
Im getting around 180H/s from my Xeon E5-2620 using this miner on Windows 7 64bit. My hashrate went up by using this miner from 150H/s. Seems bit small since Im under impression this processor should be rather good? Im new guy to CPU mining, did some mining before with my Quaddro K4000, but its just waste of time and I decided to try out with CPU.

ot: I guess you are the same wolf that runs the pool, Im seeing only 70H/s at pool statistics, normal?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 24, 2014, 08:32:33 AM
Im getting around 180H/s from my Xeon E5-2620 using this miner on Windows 7 64bit. My hashrate went up by using this miner from 150H/s. Seems bit small since Im under impression this processor should be rather good? Im new guy to CPU mining, did some mining before with my Quaddro K4000, but its just waste of time and I decided to try out with CPU.

ot: I guess you are the same wolf that runs the pool, Im seeing only 70H/s at pool statistics, normal?

If it's been a short time, yes, it's normal, as it takes 10min to be accurate.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: sparks2013 on June 24, 2014, 02:11:35 PM
If you consider cpu mining, you should consider the whole PC consumption, not just CPU.
Making a "traditional" desktop computer with a 4770K will cost more thant a GPU.

You're thinking from a single minded perspective. You are actually seeing the INTENTIONAL limitation of this algorithm.

My kids have a 2500k each and they get 110H/s when the CPU is at 50% the whole time they're on it. They use this miner in Windows. Measured AT THE WALL the power consumption goes up by 30w when the miner starts if the PC was at idle, when I have Hearthstone running in window mode, it is only going up by 20w with the miner.

So effectively, regular crappy $300 computers that I bought for my kids are getting me 110H/s for somewhere between 20w and 30w depending on what they're doing. An R9 280x draws around 300w from the wall at full power, if Claymore's miner is only using half their power, it would be 150w.

To break even in H/s you'd need to be getting closer to 660H/s per card, your results show 460 per card.

This means that people can't just buy a crap tonne of equipment and own the coin. It was intentionally made to be this way.

EDIT: Forgot to mention that the kids don't think it affects their gameplay. They play mostly Hearthstone, Path of Exile, Diablo 3, League of Legends and DotA 2.

The cryptonight algo was not designed to be more cpu friendly than gpu friendly. It is more cpu friendly actually.
I'm not complaining, i have some cpu at home (a dual xeon 2687w and a 3930K@4.8GHz) - i'm not pro or against cpu mining. I have a few gpu and some cpu.
But juste mesuring the difference when mining with cpu compared to when your kids computer are not mining is not, well, a good measure.
Such a computer while mining should draw ~250W (mesured at the wall). Maybe i'm wrong, i'll let you make the measure.
A simple rig designed for mining with gpu, with a little cpu (ga2016/2020), in iddle state, draw 80w, and when mining XMR with one R9 280X, draw 250W.
With the 5 R9 280X, 2300H/s, 1000W measured at the wall.
OK, my dual xeon give me 960H/s for less power, but i think we will see a lot of optimization (for both i hope) in a near future.

Quote
This means that people can't just buy a crap tonne of equipment and own the coin. It was intentionally made to be this way.
Why do you think it was designed intentionally in this way ? To be fair ?
Gpu friendly coin bring gpu farm and multipool, cpu only or cpu friendly bring botnet/amazon EC2 instances (see the boolberry thread, DGA talk about 200 EC2 for himself, and he is far from being the biggest one). In both case i'm still a very little miner

EDIT :
GPU miner coming to nvidia card (not released yet)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.msg7458872#msg7458872

First test, with 6 x 750Ti : 270W at the wall (something like 35w per card), ~160H/s per cards

It's not released, and it's not going to be released. Trust me.


It was released early this morning..
https://github.com/tsiv/ccminer-cryptonight


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: antonio8 on June 24, 2014, 02:35:40 PM
If you consider cpu mining, you should consider the whole PC consumption, not just CPU.
Making a "traditional" desktop computer with a 4770K will cost more thant a GPU.

You're thinking from a single minded perspective. You are actually seeing the INTENTIONAL limitation of this algorithm.

My kids have a 2500k each and they get 110H/s when the CPU is at 50% the whole time they're on it. They use this miner in Windows. Measured AT THE WALL the power consumption goes up by 30w when the miner starts if the PC was at idle, when I have Hearthstone running in window mode, it is only going up by 20w with the miner.

So effectively, regular crappy $300 computers that I bought for my kids are getting me 110H/s for somewhere between 20w and 30w depending on what they're doing. An R9 280x draws around 300w from the wall at full power, if Claymore's miner is only using half their power, it would be 150w.

To break even in H/s you'd need to be getting closer to 660H/s per card, your results show 460 per card.

This means that people can't just buy a crap tonne of equipment and own the coin. It was intentionally made to be this way.

EDIT: Forgot to mention that the kids don't think it affects their gameplay. They play mostly Hearthstone, Path of Exile, Diablo 3, League of Legends and DotA 2.

The cryptonight algo was not designed to be more cpu friendly than gpu friendly. It is more cpu friendly actually.
I'm not complaining, i have some cpu at home (a dual xeon 2687w and a 3930K@4.8GHz) - i'm not pro or against cpu mining. I have a few gpu and some cpu.
But juste mesuring the difference when mining with cpu compared to when your kids computer are not mining is not, well, a good measure.
Such a computer while mining should draw ~250W (mesured at the wall). Maybe i'm wrong, i'll let you make the measure.
A simple rig designed for mining with gpu, with a little cpu (ga2016/2020), in iddle state, draw 80w, and when mining XMR with one R9 280X, draw 250W.
With the 5 R9 280X, 2300H/s, 1000W measured at the wall.
OK, my dual xeon give me 960H/s for less power, but i think we will see a lot of optimization (for both i hope) in a near future.

Quote
This means that people can't just buy a crap tonne of equipment and own the coin. It was intentionally made to be this way.
Why do you think it was designed intentionally in this way ? To be fair ?
Gpu friendly coin bring gpu farm and multipool, cpu only or cpu friendly bring botnet/amazon EC2 instances (see the boolberry thread, DGA talk about 200 EC2 for himself, and he is far from being the biggest one). In both case i'm still a very little miner

EDIT :
GPU miner coming to nvidia card (not released yet)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.msg7458872#msg7458872

First test, with 6 x 750Ti : 270W at the wall (something like 35w per card), ~160H/s per cards

It's not released, and it's not going to be released. Trust me.


It was released early this morning..
https://github.com/tsiv/ccminer-cryptonight

I am getting 1,030 H/s with 5 750ti's


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 25, 2014, 10:03:16 AM
If you consider cpu mining, you should consider the whole PC consumption, not just CPU.
Making a "traditional" desktop computer with a 4770K will cost more thant a GPU.

You're thinking from a single minded perspective. You are actually seeing the INTENTIONAL limitation of this algorithm.

My kids have a 2500k each and they get 110H/s when the CPU is at 50% the whole time they're on it. They use this miner in Windows. Measured AT THE WALL the power consumption goes up by 30w when the miner starts if the PC was at idle, when I have Hearthstone running in window mode, it is only going up by 20w with the miner.

So effectively, regular crappy $300 computers that I bought for my kids are getting me 110H/s for somewhere between 20w and 30w depending on what they're doing. An R9 280x draws around 300w from the wall at full power, if Claymore's miner is only using half their power, it would be 150w.

To break even in H/s you'd need to be getting closer to 660H/s per card, your results show 460 per card.

This means that people can't just buy a crap tonne of equipment and own the coin. It was intentionally made to be this way.

EDIT: Forgot to mention that the kids don't think it affects their gameplay. They play mostly Hearthstone, Path of Exile, Diablo 3, League of Legends and DotA 2.

The cryptonight algo was not designed to be more cpu friendly than gpu friendly. It is more cpu friendly actually.
I'm not complaining, i have some cpu at home (a dual xeon 2687w and a 3930K@4.8GHz) - i'm not pro or against cpu mining. I have a few gpu and some cpu.
But juste mesuring the difference when mining with cpu compared to when your kids computer are not mining is not, well, a good measure.
Such a computer while mining should draw ~250W (mesured at the wall). Maybe i'm wrong, i'll let you make the measure.
A simple rig designed for mining with gpu, with a little cpu (ga2016/2020), in iddle state, draw 80w, and when mining XMR with one R9 280X, draw 250W.
With the 5 R9 280X, 2300H/s, 1000W measured at the wall.
OK, my dual xeon give me 960H/s for less power, but i think we will see a lot of optimization (for both i hope) in a near future.

Quote
This means that people can't just buy a crap tonne of equipment and own the coin. It was intentionally made to be this way.
Why do you think it was designed intentionally in this way ? To be fair ?
Gpu friendly coin bring gpu farm and multipool, cpu only or cpu friendly bring botnet/amazon EC2 instances (see the boolberry thread, DGA talk about 200 EC2 for himself, and he is far from being the biggest one). In both case i'm still a very little miner

EDIT :
GPU miner coming to nvidia card (not released yet)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.msg7458872#msg7458872

First test, with 6 x 750Ti : 270W at the wall (something like 35w per card), ~160H/s per cards

It's not released, and it's not going to be released. Trust me.


It was released early this morning..
https://github.com/tsiv/ccminer-cryptonight

Well, I stand corrected. But it sucks on AWS - I assumed it'd be great there. Probably why it was released.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: superresistant on June 25, 2014, 06:07:53 PM

I just tryed to compile and I've got this :

configure: error: in `/root/cpuminer/cpuminer-multi':
configure: error: could not find crypto
See `config.log' for more details


what's "crypto" ?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: equipoise on June 25, 2014, 06:10:49 PM
^You may need libboost 1.55


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: superresistant on June 25, 2014, 06:41:53 PM
^You may need libboost 1.55

I'm sure I have it.
Any way of checking if my libboost 1.55 install is ok ?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: equipoise on June 25, 2014, 06:48:02 PM
^I don't have much experience with linux, but if you use the monero.cc script to compile the LucasJones miner you'll then have all the pre-requirements to compile Wolf's too.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: MarcusDe on June 25, 2014, 09:00:19 PM
Hi,
Anyone is able to help with compiling completly static version for linux?
I simply can't update some libs (some software will break), so...


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: superresistant on June 26, 2014, 09:56:23 AM
^I don't have much experience with linux, but if you use the monero.cc script to compile the LucasJones miner you'll then have all the pre-requirements to compile Wolf's too.

Ok that's great.

I wonder how to make script like that.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: ade_dnb on June 27, 2014, 12:05:25 PM
Does anybody know if when the difficulty increases the hash rate goes down.

I have one instance running and the diff changes from 10000 to 13000 but the hash rate stays roughly the same.  Would I get paid more per share with higher diff?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: superresistant on June 27, 2014, 12:41:53 PM
Does anybody know if when the difficulty increases the hash rate goes down.
I have one instance running and the diff changes from 10000 to 13000 but the hash rate stays roughly the same.  Would I get paid more per share with higher diff?

The increased global hashrate make the diff go up but it is not instant.
The gap between both can make weird situation like you describe.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: ade_dnb on June 27, 2014, 01:43:17 PM
Does anybody know if when the difficulty increases the hash rate goes down.
I have one instance running and the diff changes from 10000 to 13000 but the hash rate stays roughly the same.  Would I get paid more per share with higher diff?

The increased global hashrate make the diff go up but it is not instant.
The gap between both can make weird situation like you describe.


Thanks superresistant

These are the lines I am seeing.  I didn't think this would be the same as network diff.

Code:
[2014-06-27 13:24:56] Pool set diff to 10000
[2014-06-27 13:24:56] Stratum detected new block
[2014-06-27 13:26:47] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 175.69 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-27 13:26:56] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 164.90 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-27 13:27:05] Pool set diff to 11000
[2014-06-27 13:27:05] Stratum detected new block
[2014-06-27 13:27:05] accepted: 3/3 (100.00%), 161.23 H/s at diff 11000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-27 13:27:28] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 163.26 H/s at diff 11000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-27 13:28:23] Pool set diff to 12000
[2014-06-27 13:28:23] Stratum detected new block
[2014-06-27 13:28:24] accepted: 5/5 (100.00%), 164.43 H/s at diff 12000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-27 13:29:16] Pool set diff to 13000
[2014-06-27 13:29:16] Stratum detected new block
[2014-06-27 13:29:16] accepted: 6/6 (100.00%), 159.43 H/s at diff 13000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-27 13:29:29] accepted: 7/7 (100.00%), 162.94 H/s at diff 13000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-27 13:30:07] Pool set diff to 14000
[2014-06-27 13:30:07] Stratum detected new block
[2014-06-27 13:30:08] accepted: 8/8 (100.00%), 177.46 H/s at diff 14000 (yay!!!)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: superresistant on June 27, 2014, 02:51:35 PM
The increased global hashrate make the diff go up but it is not instant.
The gap between both can make weird situation like you describe.
Thanks superresistant
These are the lines I am seeing.  I didn't think this would be the same as network diff.

These are the share difficulty.
More shares, more gain. Higher share diff, higher gain.



Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Agamemnus on June 28, 2014, 01:46:03 AM
Does anybody know if when the difficulty increases the hash rate goes down.
I have one instance running and the diff changes from 10000 to 13000 but the hash rate stays roughly the same.  Would I get paid more per share with higher diff?

The increased global hashrate make the diff go up but it is not instant.
The gap between both can make weird situation like you describe.


Thanks superresistant

These are the lines I am seeing.  I didn't think this would be the same as network diff.

Code:
[2014-06-27 13:24:56] Pool set diff to 10000
[2014-06-27 13:24:56] Stratum detected new block
[2014-06-27 13:26:47] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 175.69 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-27 13:26:56] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 164.90 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-27 13:27:05] Pool set diff to 11000
[2014-06-27 13:27:05] Stratum detected new block
[2014-06-27 13:27:05] accepted: 3/3 (100.00%), 161.23 H/s at diff 11000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-27 13:27:28] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 163.26 H/s at diff 11000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-27 13:28:23] Pool set diff to 12000
[2014-06-27 13:28:23] Stratum detected new block
[2014-06-27 13:28:24] accepted: 5/5 (100.00%), 164.43 H/s at diff 12000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-27 13:29:16] Pool set diff to 13000
[2014-06-27 13:29:16] Stratum detected new block
[2014-06-27 13:29:16] accepted: 6/6 (100.00%), 159.43 H/s at diff 13000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-27 13:29:29] accepted: 7/7 (100.00%), 162.94 H/s at diff 13000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-27 13:30:07] Pool set diff to 14000
[2014-06-27 13:30:07] Stratum detected new block
[2014-06-27 13:30:08] accepted: 8/8 (100.00%), 177.46 H/s at diff 14000 (yay!!!)

Yeah that's just the difficulty of the share you got from the pool. Your hash rate doesn't change, but the time to successfully return a good share does. All it does is reduce internet traffic. You work on shares that are twice as valuable but take twice as long. Get it?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: thunderlei on June 29, 2014, 03:56:31 AM
I can't connect with the site https://ottrbutt.com via ssl connection today, dose anyone have the problem like this?

it there any other way to download the lastest miner from wolf? Thanks


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: c18machine on June 29, 2014, 07:06:08 AM
I can't connect with the site https://ottrbutt.com via ssl connection today, dose anyone have the problem like this?

it there any other way to download the lastest miner from wolf? Thanks

take out the "s", so.. "http". I also have the same problem.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: liteon on June 29, 2014, 02:10:02 PM


These are the lines I am seeing.  I didn't think this would be the same as network diff.

Code:
[2014-06-27 13:24:56] Pool set diff to 10000
[2014-06-27 13:24:56] Stratum detected new block
[2014-06-27 13:26:47] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 175.69 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-27 13:26:56] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 164.90 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-27 13:27:05] Pool set diff to 11000
[2014-06-27 13:27:05] Stratum detected new block
[2014-06-27 13:27:05] accepted: 3/3 (100.00%), 161.23 H/s at diff 11000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-27 13:27:28] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 163.26 H/s at diff 11000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-27 13:28:23] Pool set diff to 12000
[2014-06-27 13:28:23] Stratum detected new block
[2014-06-27 13:28:24] accepted: 5/5 (100.00%), 164.43 H/s at diff 12000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-27 13:29:16] Pool set diff to 13000
[2014-06-27 13:29:16] Stratum detected new block
[2014-06-27 13:29:16] accepted: 6/6 (100.00%), 159.43 H/s at diff 13000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-27 13:29:29] accepted: 7/7 (100.00%), 162.94 H/s at diff 13000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-27 13:30:07] Pool set diff to 14000
[2014-06-27 13:30:07] Stratum detected new block
[2014-06-27 13:30:08] accepted: 8/8 (100.00%), 177.46 H/s at diff 14000 (yay!!!)

If you have, let's say 150-160 H/s and it repeat's more than 2 times per minute, at any diff (higher are better, but does not affect a lot), you'll get mining like 170 (or better).
But if your share is like 240 H/s and it returns every two minutes, you'll have the same effect like the previous one.
So, the important thing is:
- more shares (more "yay!"-s), more profit
So if you're like this lines:

[2014-06-27 13:29:16] accepted: 6/6 (100.00%), 159.43 H/s at diff 13000 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-27 13:29:29] accepted: 7/7 (100.00%), 162.94 H/s at diff 13000 (yay!!!)


You're pretty good and no need to worry, as you cannot get much better even with overclocking your CPU.



Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 30, 2014, 03:46:30 AM
Finally - got an auto-kick script for the pool at http://pool.coolty.asia working. It now restarts every 2h - no admin needed. :D


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: ade_dnb on June 30, 2014, 07:35:02 AM
Thanks for all the answers guys.  Clears it up perfectly.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Alpinist on June 30, 2014, 05:00:00 PM
Can somebody help please.
What soft do I need to compile Win 7 64bit binaries from the source?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 30, 2014, 06:04:58 PM
Can somebody help please.
What soft do I need to compile Win 7 64bit binaries from the source?


zlib (optional), libcurl, and winpthreads.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: jadefalke on June 30, 2014, 07:49:52 PM
hi on a Intel Xeon E3-1225v3 i getting 189 h/s is that in the normal Range or should that be more? i configured it with march-native


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: sk00t3r on July 01, 2014, 12:50:03 PM
hi on a Intel Xeon E3-1225v3 i getting 189 h/s is that in the normal Range or should that be more? i configured it with march-native

On an Xeon E5-2430 v2 @ 2.5ghz I am getting about 198 h/s. I do not know how the two compare. Just thought Id throw some numbers at you.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: supercoin434 on July 01, 2014, 02:51:55 PM
Is there any special params to run the miner under a Xeon? I have Xeon E5 but the miner keeps crashing. I have tried the AES and non-AES versions with same result :(


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: ahu on July 01, 2014, 05:48:11 PM
I get 465 h/s with a Xeon E5-2670v2 and with "-t 11" parameter on Windows. And this with the CPU drawing only 58W. Happy with the efficiency  ;D


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Alpinist on July 02, 2014, 07:28:13 PM
Can not compile win64 binaries from the source.
Is there any tutorial about how to do that?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 02, 2014, 08:57:20 PM
Can not compile win64 binaries from the source.
Is there any tutorial about how to do that?

It's not easy. If you're not good at cross-compiling, I'd give up.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Alpinist on July 02, 2014, 10:06:36 PM
Can not compile win64 binaries from the source.
Is there any tutorial about how to do that?

It's not easy. If you're not good at cross-compiling, I'd give up.

It's clear that it's not easy.
Would you kindly make a step-by-step guide?

I think many people in this thread are not very strong at cross-compiling but wanna be a little bit.



Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 02, 2014, 10:56:59 PM
Can not compile win64 binaries from the source.
Is there any tutorial about how to do that?

It's not easy. If you're not good at cross-compiling, I'd give up.

It's clear that it's not easy.
Would you kindly make a step-by-step guide?

I think many people in this thread are not very strong at cross-compiling but wanna be a little bit.


A step-by-step guide would take quite a while and would only work on Arch Linux x64...


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Alpinist on July 03, 2014, 10:49:27 AM
Can not compile win64 binaries from the source.
Is there any tutorial about how to do that?

It's not easy. If you're not good at cross-compiling, I'd give up.

It's clear that it's not easy.
Would you kindly make a step-by-step guide?

I think many people in this thread are not very strong at cross-compiling but wanna be a little bit.


A step-by-step guide would take quite a while and would only work on Arch Linux x64...

Ok. It's worth to wait for.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: andrepd on July 04, 2014, 03:44:32 PM
One question: when I start the miner on my 2 core machine, it spawns only one thread, and runs at ~35H/s. When I use `-t 2` it runs at nearly double, 60-70H/s. What are the downsides, if any, of running two threads. I'm presuming there is a reason the miner spawns only 1 on a 2 core machine.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: equipoise on July 04, 2014, 03:56:29 PM
^If you are using the PC while mining it could become slow if all the threads are used. You could try running it with below normal priority on 2 threads if it's OK for you. If you are not using the PC mine on 2 threads (normal priority), but monitor the temperature to stay appropriate for your processor with a good Distance to TJ MAX. Also keep your fan clean. I use Realtemp for monitoring the temperature. 


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: andrepd on July 04, 2014, 06:17:18 PM
^If you are using the PC while mining it could become slow if all the threads are used. You could try running it with below normal priority on 2 threads if it's OK for you. If you are not using the PC mine on 2 threads (normal priority), but monitor the temperature to stay appropriate for your processor with a good Distance to TJ MAX. Also keep your fan clean. I use Realtemp for monitoring the temperature. 

I'm cloud mining, testing for profitability, so that isn't an issue.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: ABISprotocol on July 05, 2014, 05:57:21 AM
Can not compile win64 binaries from the source.
Is there any tutorial about how to do that?

It's not easy. If you're not good at cross-compiling, I'd give up.

It's clear that it's not easy.
Would you kindly make a step-by-step guide?

I think many people in this thread are not very strong at cross-compiling but wanna be a little bit.


A step-by-step guide would take quite a while and would only work on Arch Linux x64...

Step by step guide? Not for windows, but for linux / Ubuntu 12.04 LTS / Wubi / Ubuntu 14.04 specific... see: 
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=669355.msg7652438#msg7652438 (comment covers 12.04 LTS / Wubi / 14.04 of Ubuntu)
also:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=669355.msg7634323#msg7634323 (covers Ubuntu 14.04 etc)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: 5w00p on July 05, 2014, 08:18:00 AM
Thank you for the step-by-step guide!  Now running the miner under Ubuntu 14.04

 ;D


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: ABISprotocol on July 05, 2014, 08:37:41 AM
Thank you for the step-by-step guide!  Now running the miner under Ubuntu 14.04

 ;D

Yay! :-)  Happy to have helped in some small way.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: MagicSnow on July 05, 2014, 10:27:44 AM
I'm having a problem in Ubuntu 14 (32bit)

when i make i got the following errors:

Code:
make[2]: *** [minerd-cryptonight_lobotomized.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/.../cpuminer-multi'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/.../cpuminer-multi'
make: *** [all] Error 2

i have installed all the lib etc: libcurl4-gnutls-dev automake build-essential libtool libssl-dev git


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: 5w00p on July 05, 2014, 06:36:35 PM
I'm having a problem in Ubuntu 14 (32bit)

when i make i got the following errors:

Code:
make[2]: *** [minerd-cryptonight_lobotomized.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/.../cpuminer-multi'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Errir 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/.../cpuminer-multi'
make: *** [all] Error 2

i have installed all the lib etc: libcurl4-gnutls-dev automake build-essential libtool libssl-dev git

Maybe the fact your ubuntu is 32-bit and not 64 has something to do with it?

Try looking through the config.log file...


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: MagicSnow on July 05, 2014, 08:23:23 PM
I'm having a problem in Ubuntu 14 (32bit)

when i make i got the following errors:

Code:
make[2]: *** [minerd-cryptonight_lobotomized.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/.../cpuminer-multi'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/.../cpuminer-multi'
make: *** [all] Error 2

i have installed all the lib etc: libcurl4-gnutls-dev automake build-essential libtool libssl-dev git

Maybe the fact your ubuntu is 32-bit and not 64 has something to do with it?

Try looking through the config.log file...

There are a lot of lines, what i need to look for?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: 5w00p on July 05, 2014, 09:28:58 PM
I don't know.  I looked through one and it was the libtools that I needed.
Try to run 64 bit ubuntu. (your CPU is probably 32-bit, so that's why you run 32-bit OS)  But if you can run 64, do it.

I am not of much help, sorry.  I'm learning and re-learning *nix myself.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: wacko on July 05, 2014, 11:45:03 PM
Hi, what do you guys think is faster, Xeon L5640 (6-core/12-thread Westmere, OCed to ~ 3-3.4 GHz) or AMD FX-8350 (8-core, OCed to ~4.4 GHz)? I'm looking at the google docs spreadsheet and can't make much sense out of it — everyone uses different miners and different versions, it's really hard to find the common denominator. What are the reasonable hashrates for these 2 cpus with the latest Wolf's CPUMiner?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: statdude on July 06, 2014, 01:18:52 AM
Hey guys,
For some reason can get "easy-miner" but not this to work.

Used this version:
Some Win binaries for those without AES-NI.

https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-12-2014.zip
https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-12-2014.zip.sig


I don't have or know what AES-NI and can't figure out how to install it.

Any ideas?

I'm on 64-bit.

Command line just says 3 miner therads started, sets diff, and keeps saying stratum detecetd new block and resets diff.

No hash tho.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: 5w00p on July 06, 2014, 02:56:06 AM
You can't install AES-NI.  Your CPU either has the instructions and transistors, etc inside the actual silicon die, or it doesn't.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: nioc on July 06, 2014, 04:56:40 AM
Drooling Masses® here.

I have read the entire thread and need some help please.  I have a Pentium G3220 64 bit Non AES_NI processor using windows 8.1 and downloaded the appropriate binary.  Post 259 dated 6/16 stated that it was not working and nothing mentioned after that.  I assume it is working now?  Even though I will get a slow hr I would like to participate.

I need to know what to do from here.  What folder do I extract it to?  What do I do after that?  There are good instructions on some of the pools what to do with one's miner and I need to know how to get the miner operational.

Thank you for your consideration.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: sleepdog on July 06, 2014, 11:31:49 AM
Hey guys,
For some reason can get "easy-miner" but not this to work.

Used this version:
Some Win binaries for those without AES-NI.

https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-12-2014.zip
https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-12-2014.zip.sig

Command line just says 3 miner therads started, sets diff, and keeps saying stratum detecetd new block and resets diff.

No hash tho.

Same thing happens for me on a machine with Xeon E5520's. Just lines of 'stratum detected new block'. No hash reported, no shares found. Both Lucas' and yam work fine on the same machines.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: george888055 on July 07, 2014, 02:06:45 PM
why can't work on my win8.1 with i3 3220??


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 08, 2014, 02:38:58 AM
Hey guys,
For some reason can get "easy-miner" but not this to work.

Used this version:
Some Win binaries for those without AES-NI.

https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-12-2014.zip
https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-12-2014.zip.sig

Command line just says 3 miner therads started, sets diff, and keeps saying stratum detecetd new block and resets diff.

No hash tho.

Same thing happens for me on a machine with Xeon E5520's. Just lines of 'stratum detected new block'. No hash reported, no shares found. Both Lucas' and yam work fine on the same machines.

It's broken atm, but I think I have a fix. Hold on.

EDIT: All fixed.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: vitalya88 on July 08, 2014, 12:58:41 PM
Hey guys,
For some reason can get "easy-miner" but not this to work.

Used this version:
Some Win binaries for those without AES-NI.

https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-12-2014.zip
https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-12-2014.zip.sig

Command line just says 3 miner therads started, sets diff, and keeps saying stratum detecetd new block and resets diff.

No hash tho.

Same thing happens for me on a machine with Xeon E5520's. Just lines of 'stratum detected new block'. No hash reported, no shares found. Both Lucas' and yam work fine on the same machines.

It's broken atm, but I think I have a fix. Hold on.

EDIT: All fixed.
miner doesn`t work
http://i031.radikal.ru/1407/7d/e18cb7a59427t.jpg (http://radikal.ru/fp/d605246ee499405eaf3638ec2b4f2ada)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 08, 2014, 01:45:38 PM
Hey guys,
For some reason can get "easy-miner" but not this to work.

Used this version:
Some Win binaries for those without AES-NI.

https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-12-2014.zip
https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-12-2014.zip.sig

Command line just says 3 miner therads started, sets diff, and keeps saying stratum detecetd new block and resets diff.

No hash tho.

Same thing happens for me on a machine with Xeon E5520's. Just lines of 'stratum detected new block'. No hash reported, no shares found. Both Lucas' and yam work fine on the same machines.

It's broken atm, but I think I have a fix. Hold on.

EDIT: All fixed.
miner doesn`t work
http://i031.radikal.ru/1407/7d/e18cb7a59427t.jpg (http://radikal.ru/fp/d605246ee499405eaf3638ec2b4f2ada)

Who taught you to read? :P

Look at the OP - it says no binaries yet.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 09, 2014, 12:41:33 PM
Bump for update. Also, I should be making Windows x64 binaries shortly, provided I don't get distracted.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: sparks2013 on July 09, 2014, 02:05:16 PM
Bump for update. Also, I should be making Windows x64 binaries shortly, provided I don't get distracted.

This is exciting news.  I'll be waiting :)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 09, 2014, 02:09:21 PM
Bump for update. Also, I should be making Windows x64 binaries shortly, provided I don't get distracted.

This is exciting news.  I'll be waiting :)

Oh, yeah, done. See OP.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: nioc on July 09, 2014, 03:36:52 PM
Bump for update. Also, I should be making Windows x64 binaries shortly, provided I don't get distracted.

This is exciting news.  I'll be waiting :)

Oh, yeah, done. See OP.

Okay, done. Have a Windows x64 binary for non-AES-NI. Does it submit shares? Yes. Does it work on a non-AES-NI system? Beats me. ??? ??? ??? ???


Where does a first time miner find instructions?  I have looked around in various places to no avail.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 09, 2014, 03:48:16 PM
Bump for update. Also, I should be making Windows x64 binaries shortly, provided I don't get distracted.

This is exciting news.  I'll be waiting :)

Oh, yeah, done. See OP.

Okay, done. Have a Windows x64 binary for non-AES-NI. Does it submit shares? Yes. Does it work on a non-AES-NI system? Beats me. ??? ??? ??? ???


Where does a first time miner find instructions?  I have looked around in various places to no avail.

I really need to write a README sometime...

Download it, open a command line, go to the folder where you downloaded it, and run it from the command line with this:

Code:
minerd-wolf-07-09-14.exe -o stratum+tcp://xmr.crypto-pool.fr:3333 -u 46sSETXrZGT8bupxdc2MAbLe3PMV9nJTRTE5uaFErXFz6ymyzVdH86KDb9TNoG4ny5QLELfopynWeBSMoT1M2Ga8RBkDqTH -p x

Replace my XMR address with yours. Or don't - won't hurt my feelings any ;D

By default, it will run one thread per core (including HT threads) available in your system minus one. If you wish to adjust this (you should), add -t <number> onto the end, where <number> is the number of threads you wish to run.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: dragonmike on July 09, 2014, 06:38:36 PM
Ok, I gave it a go on my ol' Core2Duo E8600... And something funny happens.

If I set -t 2 it gets stuck at showing difficulty. Nothing mines.
Then, the higher I set -t, the higher the miner reports hashrate. I even tried -t 100, it reported a hashrate of 2500 H/s ;D
...but on Minergate's website, no matter what -t setting I put (above 2), reported hashrate is 7.40 H/s :(

Something clearly isn't working as it should...
For ref, I get ~50 H/s using the minergate client.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: infofront on July 09, 2014, 06:41:17 PM
Hey guys,
For some reason can get "easy-miner" but not this to work.

Used this version:
Some Win binaries for those without AES-NI.

https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-12-2014.zip
https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-12-2014.zip.sig


I don't have or know what AES-NI and can't figure out how to install it.

Any ideas?

I'm on 64-bit.

Command line just says 3 miner therads started, sets diff, and keeps saying stratum detecetd new block and resets diff.

No hash tho.

This is what happens to me as well, using the 7-9 binary on Windows 7 x64 and an AMD Llano processory. Also, no matter how many threads I set it to use, it maxes out all my cores.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 09, 2014, 06:43:05 PM
Ok, I gave it a go on my ol' Core2Duo E8600... And something funny happens.

If I set -t 2 it gets stuck at showing difficulty. Nothing mines.
Then, the higher I set -t, the higher the miner reports hashrate. I even tried -t 100, it reported a hashrate of 2500 H/s ;D
...but on Minergate's website, no matter what -t setting I put (above 2), reported hashrate is 7.40 H/s :(

Something clearly isn't working as it should...
For ref, I get ~50 H/s using the minergate client.

Okay, first off - why on earth are people still using MinerGate? They're a pretty well known scam, and besides that, it doesn't work half the time! Try another pool, any other pool.

Here, point your miner to stratum+tcp://xmr.crypto-pool.fr:3333
You can check your stats at http://monero.crypto-pool.fr


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 09, 2014, 06:44:10 PM
Hey guys,
For some reason can get "easy-miner" but not this to work.

Used this version:
Some Win binaries for those without AES-NI.

https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-12-2014.zip
https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-12-2014.zip.sig


I don't have or know what AES-NI and can't figure out how to install it.

Any ideas?

I'm on 64-bit.

Command line just says 3 miner therads started, sets diff, and keeps saying stratum detecetd new block and resets diff.

No hash tho.

This is what happens to me as well, using the 7-9 binary on Windows 7 x64 and an AMD Llano processory. Also, no matter how many threads I set it to use, it maxes out all my cores.

The complaint about no hash means you didn't read the OP - I am interested in why it would max out your cores if you tell it to use less threads. Can you paste the command or batch file you're using?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: dragonmike on July 09, 2014, 06:49:25 PM
Ok, I gave it a go on my ol' Core2Duo E8600... And something funny happens.

If I set -t 2 it gets stuck at showing difficulty. Nothing mines.
Then, the higher I set -t, the higher the miner reports hashrate. I even tried -t 100, it reported a hashrate of 2500 H/s ;D
...but on Minergate's website, no matter what -t setting I put (above 2), reported hashrate is 7.40 H/s :(

Something clearly isn't working as it should...
For ref, I get ~50 H/s using the minergate client.

Okay, first off - why on earth are people still using MinerGate? They're a pretty well known scam, and besides that, it doesn't work half the time! Try another pool, any other pool.

Here, point your miner to stratum+tcp://xmr.crypto-pool.fr:3333
You can check your stats at http://monero.crypto-pool.fr
Minergate's always worked for me and they also allow merged mining with MCN and FCN, which add about 20% revenue. Why do you think they're a scam?
Also, I'm arguing that your miner doesn't report the correct hashrate so I have no idea where I stand... maybe I should try -t 10000000000000 ;D


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 09, 2014, 06:56:53 PM
Ok, I gave it a go on my ol' Core2Duo E8600... And something funny happens.

If I set -t 2 it gets stuck at showing difficulty. Nothing mines.
Then, the higher I set -t, the higher the miner reports hashrate. I even tried -t 100, it reported a hashrate of 2500 H/s ;D
...but on Minergate's website, no matter what -t setting I put (above 2), reported hashrate is 7.40 H/s :(

Something clearly isn't working as it should...
For ref, I get ~50 H/s using the minergate client.

Okay, first off - why on earth are people still using MinerGate? They're a pretty well known scam, and besides that, it doesn't work half the time! Try another pool, any other pool.

Here, point your miner to stratum+tcp://xmr.crypto-pool.fr:3333
You can check your stats at http://monero.crypto-pool.fr
Minergate's always worked for me and they also allow merged mining with MCN and FCN, which add about 20% revenue. Why do you think they're a scam?
Also, I'm arguing that your miner doesn't report the correct hashrate so I have no idea where I stand... maybe I should try -t 10000000000000 ;D

I have heard nothing but complaints about not being paid from their users. I don't often say with such certainty that something is a scam, but there's just an overwhelming number of people on IRC complaining. Anyway, them being all closed-source, I can't be sure that they're reporting the right hashrate, either. So I ask you to try on the pool I provided (or any pool based on zone117x's software), before I start bug hunting. It could very well be a bug I introduced into the miner - but I'd like to be reasonably sure of that.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: dragonmike on July 09, 2014, 07:25:45 PM
Probably a compatibility issue.
Testing on crypto-pool.fr gives more consistent results. Using -t 2 and -t 4 give similar result of between 40 and 50 H/s on the miner and the website... which is also consistent with the figure I would get from the Minergate client... except there I'd get 20% more from merged mining.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 09, 2014, 08:02:00 PM
Probably a compatibility issue.
Testing on crypto-pool.fr gives more consistent results. Using -t 2 and -t 4 give similar result of between 40 and 50 H/s on the miner and the website... which is also consistent with the figure I would get from the Minergate client... except there I'd get 20% more from merged mining.

Actually, there you'd probably get huge amounts of stales because no support for stratum, IIRC. You are using http:// with MinerGate, right?

Also, you seriously have a good opinion of MinerGate? I don't think you're lying or anything, just weird, as I've talked to literally dozens of people who don't like it - you're the first person I've talked to who does.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: NeuroticFish on July 10, 2014, 11:48:50 AM
In case that this is of any interest:

I did some tests with W0lf's latest non-AES miner (yeah, unfortunately I cannot "install" AES for now).

On my I7-920, -t 8, it shows an average of 60 H/s.
Cpuminer-multi (1.0.3) shows about 70 H/s.

The numbers on the pool have a big variation area because I get - quite often - connection errors, so I don't have a reliable way to compare.

Is there any chance that the miner hash reporting is wrong?
Is there anything I can do to avoid the connection problems?
Are there some details I am missing?

----------

I've read your explanation about 32bit vs 64bit on XMR thread... hats off to you, sir.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: sleepdog on July 10, 2014, 12:57:03 PM
Similar results here. I ran some tests with a dual E5520 server.

cpu-multi / LucasJones (these are the same thing, right?) v2.3.3 gets max 148 H/s and is pretty much always over 140.

Wolf's newly provided non-AES version gets 118 H/s max, with a range of 100 - 118.

Looks like any advantages of Wolf's miner come from the AES-NI code.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 10, 2014, 01:43:26 PM
Similar results here. I ran some tests with a dual E5520 server.

cpu-multi / LucasJones (these are the same thing, right?) v2.3.3 gets max 148 H/s and is pretty much always over 140.

Wolf's newly provided non-AES version gets 118 H/s max, with a range of 100 - 118.

Looks like any advantages of Wolf's miner come from the AES-NI code.

Lucas' code has AES-NI, as well. What OS?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: sleepdog on July 10, 2014, 02:07:19 PM
I meant that if yours is quicker than his on AES-NI systems it must be down to that part of the code that uses AES-NI.

I'm running 2008 R2 Enterprise.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 10, 2014, 03:06:55 PM
I meant that if yours is quicker than his on AES-NI systems it must be down to that part of the code that uses AES-NI.

I'm running 2008 R2 Enterprise.

Nah, your problem is Windows. My AES-NI miner is faster than his on Windows and Linux. My non-AES-NI miner is only faster than his on Linux, I believe.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: ajiekceu4 on July 11, 2014, 10:39:42 PM
Download links broken. (ottrbutt.com and 46.105.182.112 didn't response).


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 12, 2014, 02:58:17 AM
Download links broken. (ottrbutt.com and 46.105.182.112 didn't response).

Fixed - and had my VPS provider whipped. >.<


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: primer- on July 12, 2014, 09:50:34 AM
I'm getting different results when running the miner on all threads vs only physical cores.

On newer CPUs i'm getting up to 50% more power when running only on physical cpu cores. On older CPUs (also with AES) i get 50% less when using only physical cores.
Why is this ?



Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 12, 2014, 09:04:51 PM
I'm getting different results when running the miner on all threads vs only physical cores.

On newer CPUs i'm getting up to 50% more power when running only on physical cpu cores. On older CPUs (also with AES) i get 50% less when using only physical cores.
Why is this ?



That isn't obvious? Newer CPUs tend to be faster, and I don't mean in terms of clock speeds. They improve shit like out of order execution, speculative execution, branch prediction...


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: primer- on July 12, 2014, 09:19:12 PM
I'm getting different results when running the miner on all threads vs only physical cores.

On newer CPUs i'm getting up to 50% more power when running only on physical cpu cores. On older CPUs (also with AES) i get 50% less when using only physical cores.
Why is this ?



That isn't obvious? Newer CPUs tend to be faster, and I don't mean in terms of clock speeds. They improve shit like out of order execution, speculative execution, branch prediction...

I think you misunderstood my post, example below :

dual E5-2620 (12 cores/24 threads)

-t 23 (default when run without -t tag) does around 310H/s
-t 12 (physical cores) does around 390H/s

Dual E5620 (8 cores/16 threads)
-t 15 (default when run without -t tag) does around 150H/s
-t 8  (physical cores) does around 100H/s

EDIT:Dual E5620 figures might not be correct, i performed tests earlier today (couple hours) and no longer have access. Difference was 50%


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 12, 2014, 09:25:15 PM
I'm getting different results when running the miner on all threads vs only physical cores.

On newer CPUs i'm getting up to 50% more power when running only on physical cpu cores. On older CPUs (also with AES) i get 50% less when using only physical cores.
Why is this ?



That isn't obvious? Newer CPUs tend to be faster, and I don't mean in terms of clock speeds. They improve shit like out of order execution, speculative execution, branch prediction...

I think you misunderstood my post, example below :

dual E5-2620 (12 cores/24 threads)

-t 23 (default when run without -t tag) does around 310H/s
-t 12 (physical cores) does around 390H/s

Dual E5620 (8 cores/16 threads)
-t 15 (default when run without -t tag) does around 150H/s
-t 8  (physical cores) does around 100H/s

EDIT:Dual E5620 figures might not be correct, i performed tests earlier today (couple hours) and no longer have access. Difference was 50%

Oh, I see. Odd... maybe the older CPUs did hyperthreading better?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: primer- on July 12, 2014, 09:28:21 PM

Oh, I see. Odd... maybe the older CPUs did hyperthreading better?

Maybe. Newer CPUs definitely dont like the default -t option.

I'm also getting a %10-%20 difference on a i7 4770 (210-230 when using -t 7 compared to 265-280 when using -t 4).



Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Rytir_fik on July 12, 2014, 09:38:01 PM

Oh, I see. Odd... maybe the older CPUs did hyperthreading better?

Maybe. Newer CPUs definitely dont like the default -t option.

I'm also getting a %10-%20 difference on a i7 4770 (210-230 when using -t 7 compared to 265-280 when using -t 4).



In case you use it for CryptoNight hash algorithm then the answer could be this. CryptoNight hash algorithm requires 2 MB of cache for each of the mining threads. In my case of i5-2500K with 4 cores and 6MB I am able to use only -t 3 properly, so any additional thread (over 3) will only slow the process down.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 12, 2014, 11:27:36 PM
Updated readme.md and added some stuff to the OP.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Rytir_fik on July 13, 2014, 08:31:17 AM

Oh, I see. Odd... maybe the older CPUs did hyperthreading better?

Maybe. Newer CPUs definitely dont like the default -t option.

I'm also getting a %10-%20 difference on a i7 4770 (210-230 when using -t 7 compared to 265-280 when using -t 4).



in one i5 laptop I get more hashes with -t 1 than with -t 3, for aes-ni cpus less threads means more performance.

Of course it could be correct. In case you have only 3MB cache memory on your processor then the -t 1 will be faster (see my previous post  with explanation). How much memory your processor has you can check eg. here: http://ark.intel.com/products/family/75024/4th-Generation-Intel-Core-i5-Processors#@All


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 13, 2014, 09:33:17 AM

Oh, I see. Odd... maybe the older CPUs did hyperthreading better?

Maybe. Newer CPUs definitely dont like the default -t option.

I'm also getting a %10-%20 difference on a i7 4770 (210-230 when using -t 7 compared to 265-280 when using -t 4).



in one i5 laptop I get more hashes with -t 1 than with -t 3, for aes-ni cpus less threads means more performance.

Of course it could be correct. In case you have only 3MB cache memory on your processor then the -t 1 will be faster (see my previous post  with explanation). How much memory your processor has you can check eg. here: http://ark.intel.com/products/family/75024/4th-Generation-Intel-Core-i5-Processors#@All

Makes a lot of sense. There's no reason why you couldn't run more threads, but it would run a lot slower since it has to traipse out to main memory for the scratchpad all the damned time... but I wonder if the hardware prefetcher is smart enough to get that it should probably stuff the whole scratchpad in cache?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Rytir_fik on July 13, 2014, 01:08:13 PM

Oh, I see. Odd... maybe the older CPUs did hyperthreading better?

Maybe. Newer CPUs definitely dont like the default -t option.

I'm also getting a %10-%20 difference on a i7 4770 (210-230 when using -t 7 compared to 265-280 when using -t 4).



in one i5 laptop I get more hashes with -t 1 than with -t 3, for aes-ni cpus less threads means more performance.

Of course it could be correct. In case you have only 3MB cache memory on your processor then the -t 1 will be faster (see my previous post  with explanation). How much memory your processor has you can check eg. here: http://ark.intel.com/products/family/75024/4th-Generation-Intel-Core-i5-Processors#@All

Makes a lot of sense. There's no reason why you couldn't run more threads, but it would run a lot slower since it has to traipse out to main memory for the scratchpad all the damned time... but I wonder if the hardware prefetcher is smart enough to get that it should probably stuff the whole scratchpad in cache?


I do not know how exactly it works but this is one of the reasons why CryptoNight is declared as Only CPU-mining & ASIC-resistant. I am noob,  I posted here  information which I got from devs of BCN as you can see my Question on Github (because I thought that this is bug) https://github.com/amjuarez/bytecoin/issues/23.
 .... and Wolfi thx for the miner in my case of i5-2500K @ 4.3 is about 15% faster (v. 05-30-2014) than Minergare client (v3.0) (on Minergate pool) ;)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 13, 2014, 01:15:28 PM

Oh, I see. Odd... maybe the older CPUs did hyperthreading better?

Maybe. Newer CPUs definitely dont like the default -t option.

I'm also getting a %10-%20 difference on a i7 4770 (210-230 when using -t 7 compared to 265-280 when using -t 4).



in one i5 laptop I get more hashes with -t 1 than with -t 3, for aes-ni cpus less threads means more performance.

Of course it could be correct. In case you have only 3MB cache memory on your processor then the -t 1 will be faster (see my previous post  with explanation). How much memory your processor has you can check eg. here: http://ark.intel.com/products/family/75024/4th-Generation-Intel-Core-i5-Processors#@All

Makes a lot of sense. There's no reason why you couldn't run more threads, but it would run a lot slower since it has to traipse out to main memory for the scratchpad all the damned time... but I wonder if the hardware prefetcher is smart enough to get that it should probably stuff the whole scratchpad in cache?


I do not know how exactly it works but this is one of the reasons why CryptoNight is declared as Only CPU-mining & ASIC-resistant. I am noob,  I posted here  information which I got from devs of BCN as you can see my Question on Github (because I thought that this is bug) https://github.com/amjuarez/bytecoin/issues/23.
 .... and Wolfi thx for the miner in my case of i5-2500K @ 4.3 is about 15% faster (v. 05-30-2014) than Minergare client (v3.0) (on Minergate pool) ;)

CN is not only CPU mining by a long shot. GPUs will be able to do better than CPUs - in fact, they already do. BBR, on the other hand, might be actually GPU-resistant. That totally fucked blockchain-in-mah-scratchpad thing causes an ouch slow copy from host memory to GPU memory very often. On top of that, I don't think you can interrupt kernels sometimes - so you'd have to wait for the kernel to finish wasting its time hashing old data.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: cayars on July 13, 2014, 02:11:27 PM
CN is not only CPU mining by a long shot. GPUs will be able to do better than CPUs - in fact, they already do. BBR, on the other hand, might be actually GPU-resistant. That totally fucked blockchain-in-mah-scratchpad thing causes an ouch slow copy from host memory to GPU memory very often. On top of that, I don't think you can interrupt kernels sometimes - so you'd have to wait for the kernel to finish wasting its time hashing old data.

Nope BBR is not GPU resistant and is being mined with GPUs.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 13, 2014, 03:16:39 PM
CN is not only CPU mining by a long shot. GPUs will be able to do better than CPUs - in fact, they already do. BBR, on the other hand, might be actually GPU-resistant. That totally fucked blockchain-in-mah-scratchpad thing causes an ouch slow copy from host memory to GPU memory very often. On top of that, I don't think you can interrupt kernels sometimes - so you'd have to wait for the kernel to finish wasting its time hashing old data.

Nope BBR is not GPU resistant and is being mined with GPUs.

Yes, it's being mined with GPUs. But the GPU implementation is slower than a good CPU one.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: cayars on July 13, 2014, 05:45:56 PM
CN is not only CPU mining by a long shot. GPUs will be able to do better than CPUs - in fact, they already do. BBR, on the other hand, might be actually GPU-resistant. That totally fucked blockchain-in-mah-scratchpad thing causes an ouch slow copy from host memory to GPU memory very often. On top of that, I don't think you can interrupt kernels sometimes - so you'd have to wait for the kernel to finish wasting its time hashing old data.

Nope BBR is not GPU resistant and is being mined with GPUs.

Yes, it's being mined with GPUs. But the GPU implementation is slower than a good CPU one.

Let's just say I'll respectfully disagree. :)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 13, 2014, 05:59:54 PM
CN is not only CPU mining by a long shot. GPUs will be able to do better than CPUs - in fact, they already do. BBR, on the other hand, might be actually GPU-resistant. That totally fucked blockchain-in-mah-scratchpad thing causes an ouch slow copy from host memory to GPU memory very often. On top of that, I don't think you can interrupt kernels sometimes - so you'd have to wait for the kernel to finish wasting its time hashing old data.

Nope BBR is not GPU resistant and is being mined with GPUs.

Yes, it's being mined with GPUs. But the GPU implementation is slower than a good CPU one.

Let's just say I'll respectfully disagree. :)

Indeed, we should agree to disagree on this one, as we don't have access to each other's... resources.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: sleepdog on July 16, 2014, 09:44:06 AM
Can anyone link me to a guide suitable for a Linux beginner who doesn't know his github from his twatspoke on how to obtain and compile this miner, starting from a fresh ubuntu install?

I'd like to run some side by side comparisons.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: billotronic on July 16, 2014, 02:41:30 PM
This might vary a little depending on what ubuntu version you are using and ffs I have not run this in a while so it also might have a few un-needed steps but it should get you started. This is tested to work for ubuntu 12.04 x64 with AES capable CPU. This is all done in your terminal. The files are downloaded to your home folder (ie /home/cpuminer-multi)

First your dependencies:
Code:
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:costamagnagianfranco/autoconf -y
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install build-essential screen automake m4 openssl libssl-dev git libjson0 libjson0-dev libcurl4-openssl-dev autoconf python-software-properties -y

Next get the miner source and compile:

Code:
git clone https://github.com/wolf9466/cpuminer-multi.git
cd cpuminer-multi
./autogen.sh
./configure CFLAGS="-march=native"
make

Optimize system for mining
Code:
threads=`nproc`
sub="1"
mul="3"
thr=$(($threads - $sub))
thruse=$(($thr * 3))
sudo sysctl -w vm.nr_hugepages=$thruse

Start your miner with screen (http://linux.die.net/man/1/screen)

Code:
sudo screen ./minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://mine.moneropool.com:3333 -u 485VWHzZMe8hGJCXDArFVf1KUqjbwUnKqCEfPTzcU8zt6geeCMaaXECEMYsxFwQdgKi9LVX3HNMb1FQoMLKpbFRE5rUGCNe -p x


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: jeezy on July 16, 2014, 03:03:19 PM
Okay seriously dude, your backgrounds got to be trolls. Or you are a furry. Not sure what's worse.  :P


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: sleepdog on July 16, 2014, 03:13:57 PM
This might vary a little depending on what ubuntu version you are using and ffs I have not run this in a while so it also might have a few un-needed steps but it should get you started. This is tested to work for ubuntu 12.04 x64 with AES capable CPU. This is all done in your terminal. The files are downloaded to your home folder (ie /home/cpuminer-multi)

First your dependencies:
Code:
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:costamagnagianfranco/autoconf -y
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install build-essential screen automake m4 openssl libssl-dev git libjson0 libjson0-dev libcurl4-openssl-dev autoconf python-software-properties -y

Next get the miner source and compile:

Code:
git clone https://github.com/wolf9466/cpuminer-multi.git
cd cpuminer-multi
./autogen.sh
./configure CFLAGS="-march=native"
make

Optimize system for mining
Code:
threads=`nproc`
sub="1"
mul="3"
thr=$(($threads - $sub))
thruse=$(($thr * 3))
sudo sysctl -w vm.nr_hugepages=$thruse

Start your miner with screen (http://linux.die.net/man/1/screen)

Code:
sudo screen ./minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://mine.moneropool.com:3333 -u 485VWHzZMe8hGJCXDArFVf1KUqjbwUnKqCEfPTzcU8zt6geeCMaaXECEMYsxFwQdgKi9LVX3HNMb1FQoMLKpbFRE5rUGCNe -p x


Thanks a lot, this looks like exactly what I'm after. Shame I won't have the opportunity to try it out until next week now because of festival plans.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 16, 2014, 08:09:49 PM
Okay seriously dude, your backgrounds got to be trolls. Or you are a furry. Not sure what's worse.  :P

Haha, no, I really am a furry.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 16, 2014, 08:11:34 PM
This might vary a little depending on what ubuntu version you are using and ffs I have not run this in a while so it also might have a few un-needed steps but it should get you started. This is tested to work for ubuntu 12.04 x64 with AES capable CPU. This is all done in your terminal. The files are downloaded to your home folder (ie /home/cpuminer-multi)

First your dependencies:
Code:
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:costamagnagianfranco/autoconf -y
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install build-essential screen automake m4 openssl libssl-dev git libjson0 libjson0-dev libcurl4-openssl-dev autoconf python-software-properties -y

Next get the miner source and compile:

Code:
git clone https://github.com/wolf9466/cpuminer-multi.git
cd cpuminer-multi
./autogen.sh
./configure CFLAGS="-march=native"
make

Optimize system for mining
Code:
threads=`nproc`
sub="1"
mul="3"
thr=$(($threads - $sub))
thruse=$(($thr * 3))
sudo sysctl -w vm.nr_hugepages=$thruse

Start your miner with screen (http://linux.die.net/man/1/screen)

Code:
sudo screen ./minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://mine.moneropool.com:3333 -u 485VWHzZMe8hGJCXDArFVf1KUqjbwUnKqCEfPTzcU8zt6geeCMaaXECEMYsxFwQdgKi9LVX3HNMb1FQoMLKpbFRE5rUGCNe -p x


Thanks a lot, this looks like exactly what I'm after. Shame I won't have the opportunity to try it out until next week now because of festival plans.

You don't need that add-apt-repository line, unless you're using an older version of Ubuntu, maybe. Otherwise, looks good.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Eastwind on July 17, 2014, 07:14:56 AM
Is system memory critical to the miner performance? I use low memory, e.g. 800MHz as I only use GPU mining. If I increase to 1600MHz, how much is the performance gain?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 17, 2014, 07:56:19 AM
Is system memory critical to the miner performance? I use low memory, e.g. 800MHz as I only use GPU mining. If I increase to 1600MHz, how much is the performance gain?

Not sure, try it. I would think little, because the CPU should stuff most data, including the scratchpad, in its caches, but you never know.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: superresistant on July 17, 2014, 08:34:34 AM
Start your miner with screen (http://linux.die.net/man/1/screen)
Code:
sudo screen ./minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://xmr.crypto-pool.fr:6666 -u 485VWHzZMe8hGJCXDArFVf1KUqjbwUnKqCEfPTzcU8zt6geeCMaaXECEMYsxFwQdgKi9LVX3HNMb1FQoMLKpbFRE5rUGCNe -p x

FIFY

Also you can add your average hash to get an adapted diff from the pool like this :

Code:
sudo screen ./minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://xmr.crypto-pool.fr:6666+1500 -u 485VWHzZMe8hGJCXDArFVf1KUqjbwUnKqCEfPTzcU8zt6geeCMaaXECEMYsxFwQdgKi9LVX3HNMb1FQoMLKpbFRE5rUGCNe -p x

For 1.5 KH/S



Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Scala on July 17, 2014, 12:57:30 PM
Hi there!

The questions:

a) Is there any way to store the miner output to a file (i.e. text, Calc, Excel, etc.) in Windows in order to do some analysis?

b) Is there any way to run/swicth the miners with separate configurations based on the computer usage (i.e. when the computer is Idle, when the computer is beeing used by an user) to minimize user loss of performance perception in Windows?

The context: I'm having several (arround 20, from very old to 1 year old) computers in our office that I want to mine with. I'm trying to run the miners in the background without disturbing the user and trying to log the miner activity to be able to analyze it's output once per week to check serveral things:

- Is the pool rejecting my hasing power?
- Is the output from the miner close to the one repoted by the pool?
- Is the pool having connection / logouts / timeouts issues?
- Is it profiterable to mine with that PC?

Thanks in advance and sorry for my ignorance.

Southern Regards,


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: primer- on July 20, 2014, 12:02:47 PM
There is a serious memory leak , the miner eats up 8gb of memory in 24-48 hours. I suggest everyone sets up a kill/start script every couple hours or so.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 20, 2014, 12:42:17 PM
There is a serious memory leak , the miner eats up 8gb of memory in 24-48 hours. I suggest everyone sets up a kill/start script every couple hours or so.

Thanks - I'm surprised no one's mentioned that if it's that bad. I'll get on it.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: CrashOD on July 20, 2014, 03:35:42 PM
There is a serious memory leak , the miner eats up 8gb of memory in 24-48 hours. I suggest everyone sets up a kill/start script every couple hours or so.

What OS are you using? On my 50+ Ubuntu and Windows 7 machines, the memory hasn't leaked and they've been running for 5+ days straight.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: primer- on July 20, 2014, 04:21:14 PM
There is a serious memory leak , the miner eats up 8gb of memory in 24-48 hours. I suggest everyone sets up a kill/start script every couple hours or so.

What OS are you using? On my 50+ Ubuntu and Windows 7 machines, the memory hasn't leaked and they've been running for 5+ days straight.

I can confirm leak on CentOS 5.8 and 6.4.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: soul77 on July 21, 2014, 04:47:44 AM
I used RedHat 6.4. 1week+. no leak.. shouldn't it be same as Centos 6.4?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: pallas on July 21, 2014, 07:59:56 AM
just wanted to say that if you run on a single core cpu, by default it does nothing:

0 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm

1 - 1 = 0 :-D


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: pallas on July 22, 2014, 07:51:23 AM
Any chance this will work on arm?
LucasJones version doesn't work either, the cryptonight part fails to link. I believe the problem is missing aesb-arm.S in that case.
Can't find the bitcointalk thread for it, though.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 22, 2014, 01:59:14 PM
There is a serious memory leak , the miner eats up 8gb of memory in 24-48 hours. I suggest everyone sets up a kill/start script every couple hours or so.

What OS are you using? On my 50+ Ubuntu and Windows 7 machines, the memory hasn't leaked and they've been running for 5+ days straight.

I can confirm leak on CentOS 5.8 and 6.4.

Ugh, CentOS can't follow standards, no wonder.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 22, 2014, 02:00:18 PM
Any chance this will work on arm?
LucasJones version doesn't work either, the cryptonight part fails to link. I believe the problem is missing aesb-arm.S in that case.
Can't find the bitcointalk thread for it, though.

Nope - I use x86 intrinsics.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: gwada971 on July 23, 2014, 02:13:29 AM
Hi all

Juste a question, i have both AES-NI and no AES-NI cpu with windows 7 x64. Can i use only you last build minerd-wolf-07-09-14.exe for both cpu , or i have to choose the AES version cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-09-2014.zip for my AES cpu ?

don't know it you last version can support both and detect AES cpu.

And if someone have an idea of how to detect a aes-ni capable cpu from a script (wmi , vbs).

Great job !


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on July 23, 2014, 04:09:12 AM
just wanted to say that if you run on a single core cpu, by default it does nothing:

0 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm

1 - 1 = 0 :-D

Oops. I should fix that.

EDIT: Pushed fix.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: sk00t3r on July 23, 2014, 01:15:39 PM
minerd-wolf-07-09-14 hits me hard with a decrease in performance. ~120 h/s

using minerd from cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-09-2014.zip ~190 h/s

CPU is a 12 core Xeon E5-2430 V2 Is this expected?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: pallas on July 23, 2014, 01:24:24 PM
minerd-wolf-07-09-14 hits me hard with a decrease in performance. ~120 h/s

using minerd from cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-09-2014.zip ~190 h/s

CPU is a 12 core Xeon E5-2430 V2 Is this expected?

are you sure you are using the same number of threads in both cases?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: sk00t3r on July 23, 2014, 01:39:14 PM
minerd-wolf-07-09-14 hits me hard with a decrease in performance. ~120 h/s

using minerd from cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-09-2014.zip ~190 h/s

CPU is a 12 core Xeon E5-2430 V2 Is this expected?

are you sure you are using the same number of threads in both cases?

I am using the same exact .bat file settings.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: CrashOD on July 23, 2014, 11:29:40 PM
minerd-wolf-07-09-14 hits me hard with a decrease in performance. ~120 h/s

using minerd from cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-09-2014.zip ~190 h/s

CPU is a 12 core Xeon E5-2430 V2 Is this expected?

I think that minerd-wolf-07-09-14 is only for non-AES-NI cpus. That would explain the drop in hashrate for you and why when I tried it at first I saw a major drop in speed.


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: sleepdog on July 24, 2014, 12:31:09 PM
Win64 binaries exist but require AES-NI.
If I compile from source should I be able to run it on a processor without AES-NI then?  I compiled it successfully in an Virtualbox Ubuntu 13.04 virtual machine (on a Win 7 host without AES-NI), but get:

Code:
[2014-05-31 09:46:38] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2014-05-31 09:46:38] 2 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
Illegal instruction (core dumped)

upon starting up the miner.

Configure with --disable-aes-ni

Whereabouts do I need to put the "--disable-aes-ni" when compiling?


Title: Re: Wolf's MRO CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones'
Post by: pallas on July 24, 2014, 12:39:46 PM
Whereabouts do I need to put the "--disable-aes-ni" when compiling?

./autogen.sh
CFLAGS='-march=native' ./configure --disable-aes-ni
make -j<numberofcores>

possibly "make clean" before "make"


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: sleepdog on July 24, 2014, 03:42:50 PM
Similar results here. I ran some tests with a dual E5520 server.

cpu-multi / LucasJones (these are the same thing, right?) v2.3.3 gets max 148 H/s and is pretty much always over 140.

Wolf's newly provided non-AES version gets 118 H/s max, with a range of 100 - 118.

Looks like any advantages of Wolf's miner come from the AES-NI code.

I've now complied and run Wolf's latest version on this same non-AES-NI machine under Linux and although there's a very slight improvement over windows it's still way slower than LucasJones' is under Windows.

So I can only assume my previous statement was correct and that any gains Wolf's version gives are down to the AES-NI parts of his code and you need a machine with AES-NI capable cpus to take full advantage of it.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: sk00t3r on July 25, 2014, 01:28:46 PM
minerd-wolf-07-09-14 hits me hard with a decrease in performance. ~120 h/s

using minerd from cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-09-2014.zip ~190 h/s

CPU is a 12 core Xeon E5-2430 V2 Is this expected?

I think that minerd-wolf-07-09-14 is only for non-AES-NI cpus. That would explain the drop in hashrate for you and why when I tried it at first I saw a major drop in speed.

Thanks, guess I had a hard time reading lol. It clearly stated that it was for NON AES-NI. Not sure what I was thinking. THanks again.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: JohnD on July 31, 2014, 09:43:24 AM
I get this error when i try to compile it:

Code:
root@prox8:~/cpuminer-multi# ./autogen.sh
configure.ac:133: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_MSG_ERROR
      If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
      See the Autoconf documentation.

How to solve that?

System is Debian wheezy 64bit.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: equipoise on July 31, 2014, 11:03:24 AM
I'm not sure this will work, but did you tried:
Code:
./autogen.sh -m4_pattern_allow


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: primer- on July 31, 2014, 11:06:04 AM
I get this error when i try to compile it:

Code:
root@prox8:~/cpuminer-multi# ./autogen.sh
configure.ac:133: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_MSG_ERROR
      If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
      See the Autoconf documentation.

How to solve that?

System is Debian wheezy 64bit.

Compile latest autoconf from source.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: ballot on July 31, 2014, 09:43:32 PM
https://minergate.com/download/win32-cli

minergate has 32 bit miner but they restrict the pool  :'( :'(


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on August 01, 2014, 12:18:08 AM
https://minergate.com/download/win32-cli

minergate has 32 bit miner but they restrict the pool  :'( :'(

Plus, it's Minergate :P

Anyway, 99% of demand for 32-bit miners are botnets - if they want to make asstons of money, it ain't gonna be free.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Hotmetal on August 02, 2014, 05:54:11 PM
Hey..

Firstly, thank you for the awesome CPUMiner. It works like a charm.

Is merged mining possible with your / Wof's CPUMiner?

http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/273/how-does-merged-mining-work
http://monetaverde.org/

Merged mining will allow you to mine MCN (MonetaVerde) in addition to to the major coin (XMR etc) without a reduction in hashrate.
I see its been asked before, but i was unable to find a conclusive response.

Regards,
Cami


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Hotmetal on August 02, 2014, 06:29:43 PM
Btw.. Just thought i'd mention this:

Latest CPUMiner compiled from git: (24 x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz)

Over a 20 minute duration:

[2014-08-02 20:25:25] accepted: 191/234 (81.62%), 230.74 H/s at diff 980 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-02 20:25:29] accepted: 192/235 (81.70%), 230.63 H/s at diff 980 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-02 20:25:29] accepted: 193/236 (81.78%), 230.61 H/s at diff 980 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-02 20:25:31] accepted: 194/237 (81.86%), 230.16 H/s at diff 980 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-02 20:25:40] accepted: 195/238 (81.93%), 231.01 H/s at diff 980 (yay!!!)

Then i removed all of the "optimizations" from the Makefile:

From:

am__append_3 = -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerg
e-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -maes

to :

am__append_3 = -maes

The result?

[2014-08-02 20:26:44] accepted: 189/231 (81.82%), 289.83 H/s at diff 1384 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-02 20:26:45] accepted: 190/232 (81.90%), 290.09 H/s at diff 1384 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-02 20:27:03] accepted: 191/233 (81.97%), 291.41 H/s at diff 1384 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-02 20:27:07] accepted: 192/234 (82.05%), 290.47 H/s at diff 1384 (yay!!!)

There are numerous posts/warnings on-line about over-aggressive compile-time "optimizations".
Just thought I'd post my results/findings which concur.

Regards,
Cami


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on August 02, 2014, 07:05:19 PM
Btw.. Just thought i'd mention this:

Latest CPUMiner compiled from git: (24 x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz)

Over a 20 minute duration:

[2014-08-02 20:25:25] accepted: 191/234 (81.62%), 230.74 H/s at diff 980 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-02 20:25:29] accepted: 192/235 (81.70%), 230.63 H/s at diff 980 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-02 20:25:29] accepted: 193/236 (81.78%), 230.61 H/s at diff 980 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-02 20:25:31] accepted: 194/237 (81.86%), 230.16 H/s at diff 980 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-02 20:25:40] accepted: 195/238 (81.93%), 231.01 H/s at diff 980 (yay!!!)

Then i removed all of the "optimizations" from the Makefile:

From:

am__append_3 = -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerg
e-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -maes

to :

am__append_3 = -maes

The result?

[2014-08-02 20:26:44] accepted: 189/231 (81.82%), 289.83 H/s at diff 1384 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-02 20:26:45] accepted: 190/232 (81.90%), 290.09 H/s at diff 1384 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-02 20:27:03] accepted: 191/233 (81.97%), 291.41 H/s at diff 1384 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-02 20:27:07] accepted: 192/234 (82.05%), 290.47 H/s at diff 1384 (yay!!!)

There are numerous posts/warnings on-line about over-aggressive compile-time "optimizations".
Just thought I'd post my results/findings which concur.

Regards,
Cami

Each optimization I tested worked on my CPU - I don't have all CPUs, so I can't test. That much of a reduction is odd, though... are you sure the test wasn't affected by other factors?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Hotmetal on August 02, 2014, 07:45:18 PM
Each optimization I tested worked on my CPU - I don't have all CPUs, so I can't test. That much of a reduction is odd, though... are you sure the test wasn't affected by other factors?

It's quite a difference. I have 8 of those monster servers that are freshly installed (+updated) with Ubuntu 14.04.
They are all identical and unused (no running services, crons etc..) but the results are rather inconsistent across each so perhaps something else could be influencing things.
I'll dig a bit deeper and see if anything comes of it.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Hotmetal on August 02, 2014, 07:54:41 PM
One thing I found rather interesting:

root@cami001:/# minerd --help
..
  -t, --threads=N       number of miner threads (default: number of processors)
..

root@cami001:/# grep processor /proc/cpuinfo | wc -l                     
24

root@cami001:/# /usr/local/bin/minerd -o stratum+tcp://x.x.x.x:x -p x -u xx
[2014-08-02 15:49:42] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2014-08-02 15:49:42] 31 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
[2014-08-02 15:49:42] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://x.x.x.x:x

Out of interests sake, how/where is 31 processors being returned? If I set the thread count manually (-t 24), 24 threads are used and the H/S is extremely consistent.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: dewdeded on August 02, 2014, 08:16:06 PM
You have 48 cores? (2-Core-CPUs?)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: PeaMine on August 03, 2014, 12:24:26 AM
Each optimization I tested worked on my CPU - I don't have all CPUs, so I can't test. That much of a reduction is odd, though... are you sure the test wasn't affected by other factors?

It's quite a difference. I have 8 of those monster servers that are freshly installed (+updated) with Ubuntu 14.04.
They are all identical and unused (no running services, crons etc..) but the results are rather inconsistent across each so perhaps something else could be influencing things.
I'll dig a bit deeper and see if anything comes of it.

Going to check this out as well, running it without the optimizations.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: sandor111 on August 03, 2014, 12:42:24 AM
Btw.. Just thought i'd mention this:

Latest CPUMiner compiled from git: (24 x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz)

Over a 20 minute duration:

[2014-08-02 20:25:25] accepted: 191/234 (81.62%), 230.74 H/s at diff 980 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-02 20:25:29] accepted: 192/235 (81.70%), 230.63 H/s at diff 980 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-02 20:25:29] accepted: 193/236 (81.78%), 230.61 H/s at diff 980 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-02 20:25:31] accepted: 194/237 (81.86%), 230.16 H/s at diff 980 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-02 20:25:40] accepted: 195/238 (81.93%), 231.01 H/s at diff 980 (yay!!!)

Then i removed all of the "optimizations" from the Makefile:

From:

am__append_3 = -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerg
e-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -maes

to :

am__append_3 = -maes

The result?

[2014-08-02 20:26:44] accepted: 189/231 (81.82%), 289.83 H/s at diff 1384 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-02 20:26:45] accepted: 190/232 (81.90%), 290.09 H/s at diff 1384 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-02 20:27:03] accepted: 191/233 (81.97%), 291.41 H/s at diff 1384 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-02 20:27:07] accepted: 192/234 (82.05%), 290.47 H/s at diff 1384 (yay!!!)

There are numerous posts/warnings on-line about over-aggressive compile-time "optimizations".
Just thought I'd post my results/findings which concur.

Regards,
Cami

You should be getting atleast 400 H/s out of those CPUs (mine are hashing at 451 H/s)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: PeaMine on August 03, 2014, 01:01:30 AM
Each optimization I tested worked on my CPU - I don't have all CPUs, so I can't test. That much of a reduction is odd, though... are you sure the test wasn't affected by other factors?

It's quite a difference. I have 8 of those monster servers that are freshly installed (+updated) with Ubuntu 14.04.
They are all identical and unused (no running services, crons etc..) but the results are rather inconsistent across each so perhaps something else could be influencing things.
I'll dig a bit deeper and see if anything comes of it.

Going to check this out as well, running it without the optimizations.


Without optimizations:

[2014-08-03 00:58:53] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 195.91 H/s at diff 5000 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-03 00:59:04] accepted: 5/5 (100.00%), 195.29 H/s at diff 5000 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-03 00:59:07] accepted: 6/6 (100.00%), 194.45 H/s at diff 5000 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-03 00:59:08] accepted: 7/7 (100.00%), 194.69 H/s at diff 5000 (yay!!!)


With:
[2014-08-03 01:00:28] accepted: 3/3 (100.00%), 369.24 H/s at diff 5000 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-03 01:00:36] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 369.24 H/s at diff 5000 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-03 01:00:36] accepted: 5/5 (100.00%), 369.23 H/s at diff 5000 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-03 01:00:52] accepted: 6/6 (100.00%), 369.14 H/s at diff 5000 (yay!!!)

Crazy how efficient those optimizations are.
Though sadly needs to be around 440+ or so for current difficulty to break even.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Hotmetal on August 03, 2014, 04:07:58 AM
You should be getting atleast 400 H/s out of those CPUs (mine are hashing at 451 H/s)

How though? I've tried on a variety of *very expensive* hardware from Dell.
Each has 100gigs of ram, 24 cpus, etc..

Ubuntu 14.04:

# sysctl -w vm.nr_hugepages=72  (confirmed that it is set)
# git clone https://github.com/wolf9466/cpuminer-multi.git
# cd cpuminer-multi
# ./autogen.sh
# ./configure CFLAGS="-march=native"
# make
# make install
# screen -d -m -S minerd /usr/local/bin/minerd -o stratum+tcp://mro.pool.minergate.com:45560 -p x -u x
# screen -r (after a few hours of running)
[2014-08-03 06:05:25] accepted: 3952/7916 (49.92%), 288.94 H/s at diff 444 (yay!!!)

example of hardware: 24 CPUs - Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2420 0 @ 1.90GHz
another example:       24 CPUs - Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650  @ 2.67GHz





Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: sandor111 on August 03, 2014, 10:29:44 AM
You should be getting atleast 400 H/s out of those CPUs (mine are hashing at 451 H/s)

How though? I've tried on a variety of *very expensive* hardware from Dell.
Each has 100gigs of ram, 24 cpus, etc..

Ubuntu 14.04:

# sysctl -w vm.nr_hugepages=72  (confirmed that it is set)
# git clone https://github.com/wolf9466/cpuminer-multi.git
# cd cpuminer-multi
# ./autogen.sh
# ./configure CFLAGS="-march=native"
# make
# make install
# screen -d -m -S minerd /usr/local/bin/minerd -o stratum+tcp://mro.pool.minergate.com:45560 -p x -u x
# screen -r (after a few hours of running)
[2014-08-03 06:05:25] accepted: 3952/7916 (49.92%), 288.94 H/s at diff 444 (yay!!!)

example of hardware: 24 CPUs - Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2420 0 @ 1.90GHz
another example:       24 CPUs - Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650  @ 2.67GHz





Don't set threads equal to number of CPU threads, that is wrong.
The general rule is threads = floor(L3 cache / 1024)
Use this: num_threads=$(($(cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep "cache size" | uniq | cut -d":" -f2 | cut -d" " -f2)/1024))
Should be 12 for X5650


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Hotmetal on August 03, 2014, 11:21:22 AM
Don't set threads equal to number of CPU threads, that is wrong.
The general rule is threads = floor(L3 cache / 1024)
Use this: num_threads=$(($(cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep "cache size" | uniq | cut -d":" -f2 | cut -d" " -f2)/1024))
Should be 12 for X5650

You sir, are a legend. Why does it automatically set thread count to ~cpu count?

Using your formula:

[2014-08-03 13:19:33] accepted: 12/12 (100.00%), 514.93 H/s at diff 444 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-03 13:19:34] accepted: 13/13 (100.00%), 513.02 H/s at diff 444 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-03 13:19:35] accepted: 14/14 (100.00%), 528.15 H/s at diff 444 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-03 13:19:35] accepted: 15/15 (100.00%), 525.17 H/s at diff 444 (yay!!!)

Perhaps this should be added to the original post? Its a BIG improvement.

Thanks! (Now to deploy this on a motherload of machines :/)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Hotmetal on August 03, 2014, 12:01:05 PM
Why does it automatically set thread count to ~cpu count?

Using your formula:

[2014-08-03 13:19:33] accepted: 12/12 (100.00%), 514.93 H/s at diff 444 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-03 13:19:34] accepted: 13/13 (100.00%), 513.02 H/s at diff 444 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-03 13:19:35] accepted: 14/14 (100.00%), 528.15 H/s at diff 444 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-03 13:19:35] accepted: 15/15 (100.00%), 525.17 H/s at diff 444 (yay!!!)

Perhaps this should be added to the original post? Its a BIG improvement.


To answer my own question, it appears as though the improvement is noticed only when the server has a large number of cpus / cache etc.
Older machines seem to perform better with a larger amount of threads, even when cpu count is lower.

I'm breaking > 10 000 H/s without even breaking a sweat across a few machines.
Thank you


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: ballot on August 03, 2014, 02:30:50 PM
trying to compile for win 64 bit
with this instruction
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=594470.msg6542760#msg6542760
tried many different ./configure
everytime it success compile but the compiled binary crash while trying to run also i tried to strip the exe too  :-\


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: 5w00p on August 04, 2014, 01:44:03 AM
8 Core Xeon gets 370 hash/sec all day, all night with 8 threads in ubuntu 14.04 w/ hugepages=24.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: 5w00p on August 04, 2014, 01:48:16 AM
Why does it automatically set thread count to ~cpu count?

Using your formula:

[2014-08-03 13:19:33] accepted: 12/12 (100.00%), 514.93 H/s at diff 444 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-03 13:19:34] accepted: 13/13 (100.00%), 513.02 H/s at diff 444 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-03 13:19:35] accepted: 14/14 (100.00%), 528.15 H/s at diff 444 (yay!!!)
[2014-08-03 13:19:35] accepted: 15/15 (100.00%), 525.17 H/s at diff 444 (yay!!!)

Perhaps this should be added to the original post? Its a BIG improvement.


To answer my own question, it appears as though the improvement is noticed only when the server has a large number of cpus / cache etc.
Older machines seem to perform better with a larger amount of threads, even when cpu count is lower.

I'm breaking > 10 000 H/s without even breaking a sweat across a few machines.


Thank you

really, because 10,000/528 = ~19.  19 is a "few machines?"

edit: and that diff is pathetically low.  444 is for a pentium 2 or someshit.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on August 04, 2014, 10:21:49 AM
trying to compile for win 64 bit
with this instruction
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=594470.msg6542760#msg6542760
tried many different ./configure
everytime it success compile but the compiled binary crash while trying to run also i tried to strip the exe too  :-\

Shit, I don't even compile on Windows, I cross-compile.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: primer- on August 04, 2014, 10:42:03 AM
Looking for instructions on how to enable MADV_HUGEPAGE on Centos 6.5 , anyone ??


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Hotmetal on August 04, 2014, 11:41:33 AM

really, because 10,000/528 = ~19.  19 is a "few machines?"

edit: and that diff is pathetically low.  444 is for a pentium 2 or someshit.

Yes, 19 is a "few machines". There are plenty more to use across different pools / coins.
Difficulty is assigned by the network and will scale up and down. 444 is the starting difficulty for that pool and its gotten considerably higher now.

Lighten up, you sound like you're having a bad day ;)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on August 04, 2014, 01:42:41 PM
Looking for instructions on how to enable MADV_HUGEPAGE on Centos 6.5 , anyone ??

You can't, because CentOS is garbage. I had to add in a flag to disable some optimizations for that shit OS.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: primer- on August 04, 2014, 01:54:34 PM
Looking for instructions on how to enable MADV_HUGEPAGE on Centos 6.5 , anyone ??

You can't, because CentOS is garbage. I had to add in a flag to disable some optimizations for that shit OS.

I know it is, is there any other way to get it to run on centos ? If i compile on ubuntu and run on centos it complains about glibc version (2.14 required, centos runs 2.12). Any other way ? Is it possible to include glibc in the static binary ?

EDIT : Removing MADV_HUGEPAGE from cpu-miner.c fixes the problem but with a significant loss in speed. I need the extra speed!!


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: pallas on August 04, 2014, 01:57:25 PM
Looking for instructions on how to enable MADV_HUGEPAGE on Centos 6.5 , anyone ??

You can't, because CentOS is garbage. I had to add in a flag to disable some optimizations for that shit OS.

I know it is, is there any other way to get it to run on centos ? If i compile on ubuntu and run on centos it complains about glibc version (2.14 required, centos runs 2.12). Any other way ? Is it possible to include glibc in the static binary ?

EDIT : Removing MADV_HUGEPAGE from cpu-miner.c fixes the problem but with a significant loss in speed. I need the extra speed!!

the static binary can include everything.
did you try:

./configure --enable-static

or

CFLAGS='-static'

?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: primer- on August 04, 2014, 01:59:39 PM
Looking for instructions on how to enable MADV_HUGEPAGE on Centos 6.5 , anyone ??

You can't, because CentOS is garbage. I had to add in a flag to disable some optimizations for that shit OS.

I know it is, is there any other way to get it to run on centos ? If i compile on ubuntu and run on centos it complains about glibc version (2.14 required, centos runs 2.12). Any other way ? Is it possible to include glibc in the static binary ?

EDIT : Removing MADV_HUGEPAGE from cpu-miner.c fixes the problem but with a significant loss in speed. I need the extra speed!!

the static binary can include everything.
did you try:

./configure --enable-static

or

CFLAGS='-static'

?

Yes i have, i can't get past curl requirements even though i compiled curl from source with static flags.. I am not sure glibc is included in the static bin, can anyone confirm, dont want to waste time troubleshooting curl


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: primer- on August 04, 2014, 02:04:02 PM
Curl 7.31.1 compiled with :
./configure --disable-shared --enable-static --prefix=/usr/local --disable-ldap --disable-sspi
make -j 4;make install;

miner still errors out:
./autogen.sh
./configure CFLAGS="-static'
checking for the version of libcurl... 7.37.1
checking for libcurl >= version 7.15.2... yes
checking whether libcurl is usable... no
configure: error: Missing required libcurl >= 7.15.2

Any ideas ?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Hotmetal on August 04, 2014, 06:24:01 PM
Curl 7.31.1 compiled with :
./configure --disable-shared --enable-static --prefix=/usr/local --disable-ldap --disable-sspi
make -j 4;make install;

miner still errors out:
./autogen.sh
./configure CFLAGS="-static'
checking for the version of libcurl... 7.37.1
checking for libcurl >= version 7.15.2... yes
checking whether libcurl is usable... no
configure: error: Missing required libcurl >= 7.15.2

Any ideas ?

./configure is looking at curl prefix in /usr (depending on the distro). You might want configure curl like:
./configure --disable-shared --enable-static --prefix=/tmp/curl --disable-ldap --disable-sspi
make ; make install

then the miner:
./autogen.sh
./configure CFLAGS="-static' --with-libcurl=/tmp/curl
make



Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: primer- on August 04, 2014, 06:27:02 PM
Curl 7.31.1 compiled with :
./configure --disable-shared --enable-static --prefix=/usr/local --disable-ldap --disable-sspi
make -j 4;make install;

miner still errors out:
./autogen.sh
./configure CFLAGS="-static'
checking for the version of libcurl... 7.37.1
checking for libcurl >= version 7.15.2... yes
checking whether libcurl is usable... no
configure: error: Missing required libcurl >= 7.15.2

Any ideas ?

./configure is looking at curl prefix in /usr (depending on the distro). You might want configure curl like:
./configure --disable-shared --enable-static --prefix=/tmp/curl --disable-ldap --disable-sspi
make ; make install

then the miner:
./autogen.sh
./configure CFLAGS="-static' --with-libcurl=/tmp/curl
make



Tried it, no luck. Curl author should be hanged in public!!


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on August 04, 2014, 07:02:01 PM
Curl 7.31.1 compiled with :
./configure --disable-shared --enable-static --prefix=/usr/local --disable-ldap --disable-sspi
make -j 4;make install;

miner still errors out:
./autogen.sh
./configure CFLAGS="-static'
checking for the version of libcurl... 7.37.1
checking for libcurl >= version 7.15.2... yes
checking whether libcurl is usable... no
configure: error: Missing required libcurl >= 7.15.2

Any ideas ?

./configure is looking at curl prefix in /usr (depending on the distro). You might want configure curl like:
./configure --disable-shared --enable-static --prefix=/tmp/curl --disable-ldap --disable-sspi
make ; make install

then the miner:
./autogen.sh
./configure CFLAGS="-static' --with-libcurl=/tmp/curl
make



Tried it, no luck. Curl author should be hanged in public!!

Hm... try this:

Code:
make distclean
./autogen.sh
CFLAGS="-I/tmp/curl/include" LDFLAGS="-static -L/tmp/curl/lib" ./configure --with-libcurl=/tmp/curl


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on August 04, 2014, 07:03:48 PM
Looking for instructions on how to enable MADV_HUGEPAGE on Centos 6.5 , anyone ??

You can't, because CentOS is garbage. I had to add in a flag to disable some optimizations for that shit OS.

I know it is, is there any other way to get it to run on centos ? If i compile on ubuntu and run on centos it complains about glibc version (2.14 required, centos runs 2.12). Any other way ? Is it possible to include glibc in the static binary ?

EDIT : Removing MADV_HUGEPAGE from cpu-miner.c fixes the problem but with a significant loss in speed. I need the extra speed!!

You CAN compile the whole thing statically - but the thing is, DNS resolution will be fucked. You'll need to use your pool's IP. Also, god knows if hugepages will even work on CentOS, it may just fail to malloc().


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: primer- on August 04, 2014, 07:13:55 PM

Hm... try this:

Code:
make distclean
./autogen.sh
CFLAGS="-I/tmp/curl/include" LDFLAGS="-static -L/tmp/curl/lib" ./configure --with-libcurl=/tmp/curl

Same error,
checking for libcurl >= version 7.15.2... yes
checking whether libcurl is usable... no
configure: error: Missing required libcurl >= 7.15.2


Dynamic compilation works just fine...


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on August 04, 2014, 07:30:07 PM

Hm... try this:

Code:
make distclean
./autogen.sh
CFLAGS="-I/tmp/curl/include" LDFLAGS="-static -L/tmp/curl/lib" ./configure --with-libcurl=/tmp/curl

Same error,
checking for libcurl >= version 7.15.2... yes
checking whether libcurl is usable... no
configure: error: Missing required libcurl >= 7.15.2


Dynamic compilation works just fine...

Pastebin config.log.



Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: primer- on August 04, 2014, 07:33:11 PM

Hm... try this:

Code:
make distclean
./autogen.sh
CFLAGS="-I/tmp/curl/include" LDFLAGS="-static -L/tmp/curl/lib" ./configure --with-libcurl=/tmp/curl

Same error,
checking for libcurl >= version 7.15.2... yes
checking whether libcurl is usable... no
configure: error: Missing required libcurl >= 7.15.2


Dynamic compilation works just fine...

Pastebin config.log.




http://pastebin.com/UMLA4K6B


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on August 04, 2014, 07:37:06 PM

Hm... try this:

Code:
make distclean
./autogen.sh
CFLAGS="-I/tmp/curl/include" LDFLAGS="-static -L/tmp/curl/lib" ./configure --with-libcurl=/tmp/curl

Same error,
checking for libcurl >= version 7.15.2... yes
checking whether libcurl is usable... no
configure: error: Missing required libcurl >= 7.15.2


Dynamic compilation works just fine...

Pastebin config.log.




http://pastebin.com/UMLA4K6B
You built libcurl with zlib, but you did not build a static copy; therefore it looks for one because you forced static compilation and cannot find it, thus the failure.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: primer- on August 04, 2014, 07:45:44 PM

Hm... try this:

Code:
make distclean
./autogen.sh
CFLAGS="-I/tmp/curl/include" LDFLAGS="-static -L/tmp/curl/lib" ./configure --with-libcurl=/tmp/curl

Same error,
checking for libcurl >= version 7.15.2... yes
checking whether libcurl is usable... no
configure: error: Missing required libcurl >= 7.15.2


Dynamic compilation works just fine...

Pastebin config.log.




http://pastebin.com/UMLA4K6B
You built libcurl with zlib, but you did not build a static copy; therefore it looks for one because you forced static compilation and cannot find it, thus the failure.


PFF, stupid curl configuration scrit, version 7.37 is buggy as hell!!

I got it compiled now with 7.34 :

Static CURL :
Code:
wget http://curl.haxx.se/download/curl-7.34.0.tar.gz
 ./configure --disable-shared --enable-static
make -j 4;make install;

cpu miner
Code:
./autogen.sh
./configure CFLAGS="-static"
make -j 4



Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on August 04, 2014, 07:58:50 PM

Hm... try this:

Code:
make distclean
./autogen.sh
CFLAGS="-I/tmp/curl/include" LDFLAGS="-static -L/tmp/curl/lib" ./configure --with-libcurl=/tmp/curl

Same error,
checking for libcurl >= version 7.15.2... yes
checking whether libcurl is usable... no
configure: error: Missing required libcurl >= 7.15.2


Dynamic compilation works just fine...

Pastebin config.log.




http://pastebin.com/UMLA4K6B
You built libcurl with zlib, but you did not build a static copy; therefore it looks for one because you forced static compilation and cannot find it, thus the failure.


PFF, stupid curl configuration scrit, version 7.37 is buggy as hell!!

I got it compiled now with 7.34 :

Static CURL :
Code:
wget http://curl.haxx.se/download/curl-7.34.0.tar.gz
 ./configure --disable-shared --enable-static
make -j 4;make install;

cpu miner
Code:
./autogen.sh
./configure CFLAGS="-static"
make -j 4


Perfect. Remember about the fucked DNS resolution.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: tgt on August 04, 2014, 08:44:12 PM
1600 H/s:

4x Opteron 6344 (48 physical cores @ 2.6ghz static)
64G ram (12x4GB ddr3-
14.04, built from wolf's git source

inside KVM with cpu-passthrough (couldn't get it to run on 12.04 which is host's bare metal OS, could potentially be faster)
sysctl -w vm.nr_hugepages=144

pool reporting > 2kh, miner at 1600-1650kh/s.

http://i.imgur.com/qdQkiBi.png

Could probably get better performance by a) running it on baremetal, b) using numactl and a better task scheduler.



Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on August 04, 2014, 08:47:38 PM
1600 H/s:

4x Opteron 6344 (48 physical cores @ 2.6ghz static)
64G ram (12x4GB ddr3-
14.04, built from wolf's git source

inside KVM with cpu-passthrough (couldn't get it to run on 12.04 which is host's bare metal OS, could potentially be faster)
sysctl -w vm.nr_hugepages=144

pool reporting > 2kh, miner at 1600-1650kh/s.

http://i.imgur.com/qdQkiBi.png

Could probably get better performance by a) running it on baremetal, b) using numactl and a better task scheduler.



I hit 1030 or so with 23 threads on AWS - you probably need to reduce your thread count.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: liteon on August 04, 2014, 09:21:02 PM
1600 H/s:

4x Opteron 6344 (48 physical cores @ 2.6ghz static)
64G ram (12x4GB ddr3-
14.04, built from wolf's git source

inside KVM with cpu-passthrough (couldn't get it to run on 12.04 which is host's bare metal OS, could potentially be faster)
sysctl -w vm.nr_hugepages=144

pool reporting > 2kh, miner at 1600-1650kh/s.



Could probably get better performance by a) running it on baremetal, b) using numactl and a better task scheduler.

Reduce it to sysctl -w vm.nr_hugepages=48
Will be at least 20% more power.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: 5w00p on August 04, 2014, 10:40:47 PM

really, because 10,000/528 = ~19.  19 is a "few machines?"

edit: and that diff is pathetically low.  444 is for a pentium 2 or someshit.

Yes, 19 is a "few machines". There are plenty more to use across different pools / coins.
Difficulty is assigned by the network and will scale up and down. 444 is the starting difficulty for that pool and its gotten considerably higher now.

Lighten up, you sound like you're having a bad day ;)

Ok, well I guess every day I have is a "bad day" compared to the world you live in where six figures USD worth of hardware is at your disposal and you nonchalantly work them like rented mules mining XMR like it's going out of style.  Kick a brother down a Xeon server or two. will ya?  ;)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: 5w00p on August 04, 2014, 10:44:27 PM
1600 H/s:

4x Opteron 6344 (48 physical cores @ 2.6ghz static)
64G ram (12x4GB ddr3-
14.04, built from wolf's git source

inside KVM with cpu-passthrough (couldn't get it to run on 12.04 which is host's bare metal OS, could potentially be faster)
sysctl -w vm.nr_hugepages=144

pool reporting > 2kh, miner at 1600-1650kh/s.

http://i.imgur.com/qdQkiBi.png

Could probably get better performance by a) running it on baremetal, b) using numactl and a better task scheduler.



I hit 1030 or so with 23 threads on AWS - you probably need to reduce your thread count.

Wolf, why would he want to REDUCE his hashrate?

He reports 1600 hash/sec and you report 1030.  ???


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on August 04, 2014, 11:19:13 PM
1600 H/s:

4x Opteron 6344 (48 physical cores @ 2.6ghz static)
64G ram (12x4GB ddr3-
14.04, built from wolf's git source

inside KVM with cpu-passthrough (couldn't get it to run on 12.04 which is host's bare metal OS, could potentially be faster)
sysctl -w vm.nr_hugepages=144

pool reporting > 2kh, miner at 1600-1650kh/s.

http://i.imgur.com/qdQkiBi.png

Could probably get better performance by a) running it on baremetal, b) using numactl and a better task scheduler.



I hit 1030 or so with 23 threads on AWS - you probably need to reduce your thread count.

Wolf, why would he want to REDUCE his hashrate?

He reports 1600 hash/sec and you report 1030.  ???

Because he has 48 physical cores, I had 16.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Hotmetal on August 05, 2014, 06:35:59 AM
Ok, well I guess every day I have is a "bad day" compared to the world you live in where six figures USD worth of hardware is at your disposal and you nonchalantly work them like rented mules mining XMR like it's going out of style.  Kick a brother down a Xeon server or two. will ya?  ;)

It's more in the region of 7 figures USD worth of hardware. At the moment I'm just playing around on the portion of the development cluster.
Need to make sure things are running optimally before XMR mining is moved to production. I'm responsible that way :P


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: 5w00p on August 06, 2014, 03:28:17 AM
1600 H/s:

4x Opteron 6344 (48 physical cores @ 2.6ghz static)
64G ram (12x4GB ddr3-
14.04, built from wolf's git source

inside KVM with cpu-passthrough (couldn't get it to run on 12.04 which is host's bare metal OS, could potentially be faster)
sysctl -w vm.nr_hugepages=144

pool reporting > 2kh, miner at 1600-1650kh/s.

http://i.imgur.com/qdQkiBi.png

Could probably get better performance by a) running it on baremetal, b) using numactl and a better task scheduler.



I hit 1030 or so with 23 threads on AWS - you probably need to reduce your thread count.

Wolf, why would he want to REDUCE his hashrate?

He reports 1600 hash/sec and you report 1030.  ???

Because he has 48 physical cores, I had 16.

OK. What AWS instance type has Opterons?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on August 06, 2014, 03:37:05 AM
1600 H/s:

4x Opteron 6344 (48 physical cores @ 2.6ghz static)
64G ram (12x4GB ddr3-
14.04, built from wolf's git source

inside KVM with cpu-passthrough (couldn't get it to run on 12.04 which is host's bare metal OS, could potentially be faster)
sysctl -w vm.nr_hugepages=144

pool reporting > 2kh, miner at 1600-1650kh/s.

http://i.imgur.com/qdQkiBi.png

Could probably get better performance by a) running it on baremetal, b) using numactl and a better task scheduler.



I hit 1030 or so with 23 threads on AWS - you probably need to reduce your thread count.

Wolf, why would he want to REDUCE his hashrate?

He reports 1600 hash/sec and you report 1030.  ???

Because he has 48 physical cores, I had 16.

OK. What AWS instance type has Opterons?

None, but I doubt that 16 Intel cores would get 55% of the hash that 48 AMD cores get, assuming the Opterons are reasonably new and support AES-NI.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: 5w00p on August 06, 2014, 03:38:34 AM
OK.  What instance type did you get 1030 hash/sec on 16 cores?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on August 06, 2014, 04:24:14 AM
OK.  What instance type did you get 1030 hash/sec on 16 cores?

The only instance type with 16 cores that's meant for compute. c3.8xlarge.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: tgt on August 06, 2014, 06:40:40 PM
It's fully utilizing the cores (minus one for some reason... maybe the scheduler thread is included in the thread limit?) so I can't see a huge gain other than running it on bare metal.

The opteron cores are not as efficient per ghz as the haswells.  The only advantage is that you have physical cores without any hyperthreading.  I'll try and compile the miner on 12.04 to run it on bare metal and see what/if any advantages are seen vs running it kvm with cpu passthrough.

The server is about $3300, so it's not exactly cost effective.  Just fun to see.

edit: just noticed the instructions to install it on 12.04, derp.

http://i.imgur.com/iH7vs4r.png


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: primer- on August 06, 2014, 07:13:44 PM
It's fully utilizing the cores (minus one for some reason... maybe the scheduler thread is included in the thread limit?) so I can't see a huge gain other than running it on bare metal.

The opteron cores are not as efficient per ghz as the haswells.  The only advantage is that you have physical cores without any hyperthreading.  I'll try and compile the miner on 12.04 to run it on bare metal and see what/if any advantages are seen vs running it kvm with cpu passthrough.

The server is about $3300, so it's not exactly cost effective.  Just fun to see.

edit: just noticed the instructions to install it on 12.04, derp.

http://i.imgur.com/iH7vs4r.png

What do you get when running on only 24 cores ?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: PeaMine on August 07, 2014, 04:35:20 AM
It's fully utilizing the cores (minus one for some reason... maybe the scheduler thread is included in the thread limit?) so I can't see a huge gain other than running it on bare metal.

The opteron cores are not as efficient per ghz as the haswells.  The only advantage is that you have physical cores without any hyperthreading.  I'll try and compile the miner on 12.04 to run it on bare metal and see what/if any advantages are seen vs running it kvm with cpu passthrough.

The server is about $3300, so it's not exactly cost effective.  Just fun to see.

edit: just noticed the instructions to install it on 12.04, derp.

http://i.imgur.com/iH7vs4r.png
Is that the 16 core Intel system or the AMD 48 core?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: 5w00p on August 07, 2014, 09:24:30 PM
It's fully utilizing the cores (minus one for some reason... maybe the scheduler thread is included in the thread limit?) so I can't see a huge gain other than running it on bare metal.

The opteron cores are not as efficient per ghz as the haswells.  The only advantage is that you have physical cores without any hyperthreading.  I'll try and compile the miner on 12.04 to run it on bare metal and see what/if any advantages are seen vs running it kvm with cpu passthrough.

The server is about $3300, so it's not exactly cost effective.  Just fun to see.

edit: just noticed the instructions to install it on 12.04, derp.

http://i.imgur.com/iH7vs4r.png
Is that the 16 core Intel system or the AMD 48 core?

methinks its the Opteron machine.

Wolf0, thanks for sharing.  I should not be surprised that the coder of the miner is very effective at managing his rented rigs, and I am not really, but I gotta say that your ~64 h/s/core is quite impressive on the c3.8xlarge instances. 


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on August 07, 2014, 09:34:22 PM
It's fully utilizing the cores (minus one for some reason... maybe the scheduler thread is included in the thread limit?) so I can't see a huge gain other than running it on bare metal.

The opteron cores are not as efficient per ghz as the haswells.  The only advantage is that you have physical cores without any hyperthreading.  I'll try and compile the miner on 12.04 to run it on bare metal and see what/if any advantages are seen vs running it kvm with cpu passthrough.

The server is about $3300, so it's not exactly cost effective.  Just fun to see.

edit: just noticed the instructions to install it on 12.04, derp.

http://i.imgur.com/iH7vs4r.png
Is that the 16 core Intel system or the AMD 48 core?

methinks its the Opteron machine.

Wolf0, thanks for sharing.  I should not be surprised that the coder of the miner is very effective at managing his rented rigs, and I am not really, but I gotta say that your ~64 h/s/core is quite impressive on the c3.8xlarge instances. 

Actually, I can get 70H/s/core on c3.8xlarge, 64H/s/core is just with this miner...


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: slb on August 08, 2014, 02:48:37 PM
Hi,
I am trying to compile on Mac, but I receive this error when I 'make'
Quote
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread   -Qunused-arguments -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16  -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -maes   -MT minerd-cpu-miner.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/minerd-cpu-miner.Tpo -c -o minerd-cpu-miner.o `test -f 'cpu-miner.c' || echo './'`cpu-miner.c
clang: error: unknown argument: '-falign-loops=16' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-falign-jumps=16' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-falign-labels=16' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-fuse-linker-plugin' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-fvariable-expansion-in-unroller' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-ftree-loop-if-convert-stores' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-fbranch-target-load-optimize2' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-fsched2-use-superblocks' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
make[2]: *** [minerd-cpu-miner.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2

I have the dependencies installed. 'autogen.sh' and 'configure' run without errors.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: tgt on August 09, 2014, 01:31:28 AM
It's fully utilizing the cores (minus one for some reason... maybe the scheduler thread is included in the thread limit?) so I can't see a huge gain other than running it on bare metal.

The opteron cores are not as efficient per ghz as the haswells.  The only advantage is that you have physical cores without any hyperthreading.  I'll try and compile the miner on 12.04 to run it on bare metal and see what/if any advantages are seen vs running it kvm with cpu passthrough.

The server is about $3300, so it's not exactly cost effective.  Just fun to see.

edit: just noticed the instructions to install it on 12.04, derp.

http://i.imgur.com/iH7vs4r.png
Is that the 16 core Intel system or the AMD 48 core?

methinks its the Opteron machine.

Wolf0, thanks for sharing.  I should not be surprised that the coder of the miner is very effective at managing his rented rigs, and I am not really, but I gotta say that your ~64 h/s/core is quite impressive on the c3.8xlarge instances.  

Actually, I can get 70H/s/core on c3.8xlarge, 64H/s/core is just with this miner...

I get 64H/core on my opteron...  the speed actually tops out at 26 cores (26*64=1664H/s same as in the screenshot).  I guess that's L3 bandwidth limit - It's amusing to see how intel and amd are virtually identical per core due to this similar cache speed limitation.  Pushing numactl to force workloads onto physical cores/cache pairs didn't make a difference.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: nioc on August 09, 2014, 01:45:15 AM
i5-3450 windows 7

Downloaded both the 06-09-2014 Wolf miner and the LucasJones miner.  Wolf is 5% faster according to the numbers the miners display.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: PeaMine on August 09, 2014, 03:24:19 AM
Anyone have any ideal performance/cost CPU desktop/server builds for XMR?
Thinking about buy a new single/dual CPU setup for this + gaming rig and GPU mine also.
AMD has some cheap setups, but don't want to waste money, but I also want to buy something on newegg with BTC....though the 10% discount expired I think =(


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Hotmetal on August 09, 2014, 05:10:48 PM
Anyone have any ideal performance/cost CPU desktop/server builds for XMR?
Thinking about buy a new single/dual CPU setup for this + gaming rig and GPU mine also.
AMD has some cheap setups, but don't want to waste money, but I also want to buy something on newegg with BTC....though the 10% discount expired I think =(

I'm uncertain of the CPU side (cost vs performance).

GPU wise, merged mining (XMR+FCN) on a GeForce GTX 750 Ti hits 220->250 h/s. (can probably get more if its just dedicated to that as I'm running it inside of Linux as a desktop)
At the moment its the fastest GPU per watt of power used and its relatively cheap.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: redsn0w on August 09, 2014, 06:06:08 PM
Has anyone successfully compiled Wolfs cpuminer under centOS 6.4?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: primer- on August 09, 2014, 06:22:10 PM
Has anyone successfully compiled Wolfs cpuminer under centOS 6.4?


Yes, remove MADV_HUGEPAGE from cpu-miner.c and it will compile


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on August 10, 2014, 02:43:16 AM
Has anyone successfully compiled Wolfs cpuminer under centOS 6.4?


Yes, remove MADV_HUGEPAGE from cpu-miner.c and it will compile

I believe there's a configure option for that...


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: redsn0w on August 10, 2014, 07:40:31 AM
Has anyone successfully compiled Wolfs cpuminer under centOS 6.4?


Yes, remove MADV_HUGEPAGE from cpu-miner.c and it will compile

ok thanks for the reply ..;)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on August 10, 2014, 08:03:24 AM
Has anyone successfully compiled Wolfs cpuminer under centOS 6.4?


Yes, remove MADV_HUGEPAGE from cpu-miner.c and it will compile

ok thanks for the reply ..;)

This should save you some work:

Code:
./configure --disable-linux-hugepages


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Frangomel on August 11, 2014, 03:17:41 PM
When I start CPU miner with i5-3350p have just only 75 h/s. I changed threads from 1 to 4, always same??? What is the problem???

edit: now have 120 h/s, hope it is ok now?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: nioc on August 12, 2014, 08:10:07 AM
When I start CPU miner with i5-3350p have just only 75 h/s. I changed threads from 1 to 4, always same??? What is the problem???

edit: now have 120 h/s, hope it is ok now?

I didn't try 1 or 4 threads but did try 2 and 3 threads with an i5-3450 with 3 threads being slightly faster.  Windows 7


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Frangomel on August 13, 2014, 12:20:40 PM
have about 130 h/s with 3 threads, not so bad :)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: tljenson on August 26, 2014, 08:16:21 AM
I new to mining, I want to make sure this is working ok. Here is what I get when I start mining.

[2014-08-26 02:13:39] thread 1: 500 hashes, 49.30 H/s
[2014-08-26 02:13:39] thread 0: 490 hashes, 48.25 H/s
[2014-08-26 02:13:39] thread 2: 476 hashes, 46.93 H/s
[2014-08-26 02:13:39] Stratum authentication failed
[2014-08-26 02:13:39] ...retry after 10 seconds

Do I have to worry that authentication failed? If so what am I doing wrong. The reason I asked is I tried several pools and got the same failed message. So I assume that is part of the mining, or is it>


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: nioc on August 26, 2014, 09:33:33 AM
I new to mining, I want to make sure this is working ok. Here is what I get when I start mining.

[2014-08-26 02:13:39] thread 1: 500 hashes, 49.30 H/s
[2014-08-26 02:13:39] thread 0: 490 hashes, 48.25 H/s
[2014-08-26 02:13:39] thread 2: 476 hashes, 46.93 H/s
[2014-08-26 02:13:39] Stratum authentication failed
[2014-08-26 02:13:39] ...retry after 10 seconds

Do I have to worry that authentication failed? If so what am I doing wrong. The reason I asked is I tried several pools and got the same failed message. So I assume that is part of the mining, or is it>

Yes worry because it's not working.  It's not the pool. 

Most likely there is a space in your wallet address when you copy and pasted it.  I think it happens because the address wraps to 2 lines in the wallet and it is not always obvious when you copy it especially if it is on 2 lines in the bat file.

Let me know what happens.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: TimeHacker on August 26, 2014, 09:49:25 AM
I new to mining, I want to make sure this is working ok. Here is what I get when I start mining.

[2014-08-26 02:13:39] thread 1: 500 hashes, 49.30 H/s
[2014-08-26 02:13:39] thread 0: 490 hashes, 48.25 H/s
[2014-08-26 02:13:39] thread 2: 476 hashes, 46.93 H/s
[2014-08-26 02:13:39] Stratum authentication failed
[2014-08-26 02:13:39] ...retry after 10 seconds

Do I have to worry that authentication failed? If so what am I doing wrong. The reason I asked is I tried several pools and got the same failed message. So I assume that is part of the mining, or is it>

Which pool do you use? Everything works OK for me on Minergate (http://bit.ly/1l6hUPe) for exmple...


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: nioc on August 26, 2014, 04:08:41 PM
It's not the pool.  Minergate is not on the list of pools on the first page of the Monero ANN page.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.0


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: bigj on August 27, 2014, 01:18:54 PM
Is there going to be an updated miner? Update coming?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: pallas on August 27, 2014, 02:14:58 PM
I don't think so. OP said he has a faster miner but didn't post it.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: 5w00p on August 27, 2014, 09:35:08 PM
I PM'd Wolf about any updates, etc but got no reply.  So I use the released miner.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: vgo on August 30, 2014, 10:08:54 AM
+280 Mh/s i7-3820 @4.3ghz Wolf 05-29-2014 w7 64bits -t5   49-55şc Corsair H60 Push-Pull 2000rpm.

http://i60.tinypic.com/2s8gzzk.jpg

Same with FX-8320 @4.5ghz -t8

http://i58.tinypic.com/2n00bw4.jpg


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Eastwind on August 30, 2014, 07:03:11 PM
+280 Mh/s i7-3820 @4.3ghz Wolf 05-29-2014 w7 64bits -t5   49-55şc Corsair H60 Push-Pull 2000rpm.


Do they use the same amount of power?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: vgo on August 30, 2014, 11:30:05 PM
+280 Mh/s i7-3820 @4.3ghz Wolf 05-29-2014 w7 64bits -t5   49-55şc Corsair H60 Push-Pull 2000rpm.


Do they use the same amount of power?

No.

Edit: +300 H/s  @4.625 GHz


http://i59.tinypic.com/2z6ec91.jpg



Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: MONERO.RS on September 05, 2014, 08:09:47 PM

Happy to announce 5-20% performance increase, depending on the number of cores, out of Wolf's current public miner!

We support Wolf's work and will soon enable pool donations to Wolf for his miner development

Miner download here :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=758961


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: peaprotein on September 07, 2014, 09:16:44 PM
I have a dual Opteron 6274 machine with 32 cores and 32 gb ram.  I was expecting to get results around 800 and maybe even over 1000 for my hash rate.  I'm using Windows x64 and have tinkered with the threads settings.  All I ever get is 200 and a maybe 300 hash rate.  Is there anything I can do to get something similar to what is found on the google docs sheet.  There are several dual opteron configurations that are pushing 1000.

Thank you very much in advance for anybody that is willing to provide some input!


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: 5w00p on September 08, 2014, 06:00:01 PM
Did you set the memory to "Lock Pages in Memory?"

Local Security Setting – Lock pages in memory

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms190730.aspx (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms190730.aspx)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: WigitGetIt on September 10, 2014, 02:54:14 PM
Hello.  GlobalBoost-Y just launched and it is a cpu only coin.  It uses the yescrypt algo, so their is no mining software yet.  It is the first coin to use this algo.   I wanted to reach out and see if we could get some assistance.  We can pay for the work.  Please feel free to PM me or drop a comment on the thread. Thanks  Smiley

GitHub for Yescrypt: https://github.com/bsdphk/PHC/tree/master/Yescrypt

GitHUb for GlobalBoost-Y Coin: https://github.com/GlobalBoost/GlobalBoost-Y

BitcoinTalk Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=775289.new#new

IRC https://kiwiirc.com/client/irc.kiwiirc.com/#GlobalBoost (https://kiwiirc.com/client/irc.kiwiirc.com/#GlobalBoost)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: GlobalBoost on September 10, 2014, 03:30:10 PM
We are actively looking!

Hello.  GlobalBoost-Y just launched and it is a cpu only coin.  It uses the yescrypt algo, so their is no mining software yet.  It is the first coin to use this algo.   I wanted to reach out and see if we could get some assistance.  We can pay for the work.  Please feel free to PM me or drop a comment on the thread. Thanks  Smiley

GitHub for Yescrypt: https://github.com/bsdphk/PHC/tree/master/Yescrypt

GitHUb for GlobalBoost-Y Coin: https://github.com/GlobalBoost/GlobalBoost-Y

BitcoinTalk Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=775289.new#new

IRC https://kiwiirc.com/client/irc.kiwiirc.com/#GlobalBoost (https://kiwiirc.com/client/irc.kiwiirc.com/#GlobalBoost)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: primer- on September 11, 2014, 09:32:57 AM
Can someone fix the bug that causes miner to hash even when not connected to the pool ? This is a waste of cpu resources and should be fixed. I'm offering a 0.05BTC bounty for the fix!


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: aikklond on September 11, 2014, 10:47:22 AM
I am totaly confused with the OP.

Which one should i download for an A8-5600 cpu?


BTW very good work but please clean up the OP!


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Hotmetal on September 11, 2014, 10:52:02 AM

Happy to announce 5-20% performance increase, depending on the number of cores, out of Wolf's current public miner!

We support Wolf's work and will soon enable pool donations to Wolf for his miner development

Miner download here :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=758961


Just wanted to confirm. It is 10-20% faster on average across some of my multi-core machines.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: sleepdog on September 11, 2014, 02:43:46 PM
BTW very good work but please clean up the OP!

I'll second that. Which is the latest version for Win 64 with AES-NI? cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-12-2014?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: cryptocointools on September 11, 2014, 05:53:07 PM
BTW very good work but please clean up the OP!

I'll second that. Which is the latest version for Win 64 with AES-NI? cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-12-2014?

That 06-12-2014 version is for withOUT AES-NI.
The newest Windows 64 binary WITH AES-NI is 06-09-2014 I believe.
That one is the fastest for me.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: primer- on September 16, 2014, 09:19:04 AM
Can someone fix the bug that causes miner to hash even when not connected to the pool ? This is a waste of cpu resources and should be fixed. I'm offering a 0.05BTC bounty for the fix!

Still looking for a fix, anyone ?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: coomme on September 19, 2014, 01:04:27 PM
does dev still here ?  ::) ::)

[
Okay, done. Have a Windows x64 binary for non-AES-NI. Does it submit shares? Yes. Does it work on a non-AES-NI system? Beats me.
https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/minerd-wolf-07-09-14.exe
]

I use this miner, but  system memory increased more and more

how to clean memory and set remine auto?

or dev fix this ?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Rabinovitch on September 19, 2014, 04:39:26 PM

Just wanted to confirm. It is 10-20% faster on average across some of my multi-core machines.
The same performance on my FX-8350.  :-\


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: OrientA on September 19, 2014, 05:15:13 PM

Just wanted to confirm. It is 10-20% faster on average across some of my multi-core machines.
The same performance on my FX-8350.  :-\

What is your operating system?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Rabinovitch on September 20, 2014, 03:09:11 AM
Win7 x64.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: picobell on September 28, 2014, 02:10:46 PM
I get this error when i try to compile it:

Code:
root@prox8:~/cpuminer-multi# ./autogen.sh
configure.ac:133: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_MSG_ERROR
      If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
      See the Autoconf documentation.

How to solve that?

System is Debian wheezy 64bit.

Compile latest autoconf from source.

Any other solution? I am on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and I'd rather stick to available repository versions. There is other stuff on that machine that may break.

Edit:
I just checked and my version of autoconf is 2.69, which seems to be the latest version according to http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/autoconf/


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: BitcoinPappi on October 02, 2014, 06:09:29 AM
I get this error when i try to compile it:

Code:
root@prox8:~/cpuminer-multi# ./autogen.sh
configure.ac:133: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_MSG_ERROR
      If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
      See the Autoconf documentation.

How to solve that?

System is Debian wheezy 64bit.

Compile latest autoconf from source.

Any other solution? I am on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and I'd rather stick to available repository versions. There is other stuff on that machine that may break.

Edit:
I just checked and my version of autoconf is 2.69, which seems to be the latest version according to http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/autoconf/

You are more than likely missing this http://www.gnu.org/software/m4/ (http://www.gnu.org/software/m4/)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: tanoury on October 02, 2014, 04:30:36 PM
Help, I get this error when compiling on ubuntu 14.04. I tried two different computers, both get same error.
Quote
gcc version 4.9.1 (Ubuntu 4.9.1-3ubuntu2~14.04.1)
configure:3441: $? = 0
configure:3430: gcc -V >&5
gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-V'
gcc: fatal error: no input files
compilation terminated.
Any ideas??


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: tanoury on October 02, 2014, 05:40:07 PM
Help, I get this error when compiling on ubuntu 14.04. I tried two different computers, both get same error.
Quote
gcc version 4.9.1 (Ubuntu 4.9.1-3ubuntu2~14.04.1)
configure:3441: $? = 0
configure:3430: gcc -V >&5
gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-V'
gcc: fatal error: no input files
compilation terminated.
Any ideas??

SOLVED: Built fine without -march=native


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: srmojuze on October 03, 2014, 04:36:31 PM
Hi all,
Script for Ubuntu 14, XDN mining on extremepool.org (IP address is used because of DNS bug in curl or something)

Code:
sudo apt-get install git;sudo apt-get install build-essential;sudo apt-get install pkg-config;sudo apt-get install libcurl4-openssl-dev;sudo apt-get install automake

wget http://curl.haxx.se/download/curl-7.34.0.tar.gz;tar -xvf curl-7.34.0.tar.gz;cd curl-7.34.0/;./configure --disable-shared --enable-static;make -j 4;sudo make install;cd ..

git clone https://github.com/wolf9466/cpuminer-multi;cd cpuminer-multi;./autogen.sh;./configure;make -j 4

sudo ./minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://216.119.175.92:5555 -u YOURADDRESSHERE -p x


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: goxed on October 04, 2014, 12:20:56 AM
Compiling Wolf's cpu-miner in Mac OS X 10.9 Mavericks / 10.10 Yosemite

Change the cpuminer-multi.rb to my git repo. Just changed Makefile.am for compatibility with clang, everything else is the same.
vim /usr/local/Library/Taps/sammy007/homebrew-cryptonight/cpuminer-multi.rb
Code:
require "formula"

class CpuminerMulti < Formula
  homepage "https://github.com/goxed/cpuminer-multi"
  head "https://github.com/goxed/cpuminer-multi.git"

  depends_on "automake" => :build
  depends_on "autoconf" => :build
  depends_on "libtool" => :build
  depends_on "curl"
  depends_on "jansson"

  def install
    system "./autogen.sh"
    system "perl ./nomacro.pl"
    system "CFLAGS=\"-march=native -mtune=native -maes\" ./configure"
    system "make"
    bin.install "minerd"
  end
end


re-run brew
Code:
brew reinstall --HEAD cpuminer-multi


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: rkm80 on October 07, 2014, 07:54:58 PM
Hi!

I have successfully compiled Wolf's miner on Debian, but I don't understand how to start SOLO-mining mode.
Can somebody write required options to start solo-mining.

Thank you!





Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on October 12, 2014, 11:36:42 AM
Hi!

I have successfully compiled Wolf's miner on Debian, but I don't understand how to start SOLO-mining mode.
Can somebody write required options to start solo-mining.

Thank you!





You cannot solo mine with this - only pool mine.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Butoeskor on October 28, 2014, 02:07:24 AM
I have problem for download minerd-wolf-07-09-14.exe with error message. Dont finish the download. Which is the problem?.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: bigj on October 29, 2014, 08:14:29 AM
Will this miner be updated again any soon?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Giulini on November 19, 2014, 07:55:06 PM
System:
ubuntu14.04 LTS, 8 GB RAM, no extra AMD Driver
>FX8320E, 8 Core 95 W, wolfs spuminer, 325 h/s
(>GPU R9 280x, claymore v9.1, 535 h/s)
Earnings/Power= 25 % ;-)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: 5w00p on November 19, 2014, 11:24:05 PM
System:
ubuntu14.04 LTS, 8 GB RAM, no extra AMD Driver
>FX8320E, 8 Core 95 W, wolfs spuminer, 325 h/s
(>GPU R9 280x, claymore v9.1, 535 h/s)
Earnings/Power= 25 % ;-)


Oh Word?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: liteon on January 31, 2015, 08:02:49 PM
Looks like ottrbutt.com is down?
Any mirror(s)?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on January 31, 2015, 08:35:14 PM
Looks like ottrbutt.com is down?
Any mirror(s)?

Sorry, it'll be up as soon as I can fix it.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: liteon on February 01, 2015, 12:11:29 PM
got one from my backup ... here, just if you don't fix soon
Code:
http://www20.zippyshare.com/v/E1uVaRqD/file.html


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Molet on February 20, 2015, 08:10:07 AM
Debian 7 - not work  :(
my system
Code:
root@BDServer:/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi# lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Debian
Description:    Debian GNU/Linux 7.8 (wheezy)
Release:        7.8
Codename:       wheezy

"./autogen.sh" command log
Code:
root@BDServer:/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi# ./autogen.sh
configure.ac:18: installing `./compile'
configure.ac:4: installing `./config.guess'
configure.ac:4: installing `./config.sub'
configure.ac:6: installing `./install-sh'
configure.ac:6: installing `./missing'

"./configure" command log
Code:
root@BDServer:/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi# ./configure CFLAGS="-march=native"
checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p
checking for gawk... no
checking for mawk... mawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking for suffix of executables...
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3
checking for gcc option to accept ISO C99... -std=gnu99
checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -std=gnu99 -E
checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /bin/grep
checking for egrep... /bin/grep -E
checking whether gcc -std=gnu99 needs -traditional... no
checking whether gcc -std=gnu99 and cc understand -c and -o together... yes
checking dependency style of gcc -std=gnu99... gcc3
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking for ANSI C header files... yes
checking for sys/types.h... yes
checking for sys/stat.h... yes
checking for stdlib.h... yes
checking for string.h... yes
checking for memory.h... yes
checking for strings.h... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking sys/endian.h usability... no
checking sys/endian.h presence... no
checking for sys/endian.h... no
checking sys/param.h usability... yes
checking sys/param.h presence... yes
checking for sys/param.h... yes
checking syslog.h usability... yes
checking syslog.h presence... yes
checking for syslog.h... yes
checking for sys/sysctl.h... yes
checking whether be32dec is declared... no
checking whether le32dec is declared... no
checking whether be32enc is declared... no
checking whether le32enc is declared... no
checking for size_t... yes
checking for working alloca.h... yes
checking for alloca... yes
checking for getopt_long... yes
checking whether we can compile AVX code... yes
checking whether we can compile XOP code... yes
checking whether we can compile AVX2 code... yes
checking for json_loads in -ljansson... no
checking for pthread_create in -lpthread... yes
checking for gawk... (cached) mawk
checking for curl-config... /usr/bin/curl-config
checking for the version of libcurl... 7.26.0
checking for libcurl >= version 7.15.2... yes
checking whether libcurl is usable... yes
checking for curl_free... yes
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating compat/Makefile
config.status: creating compat/jansson/Makefile
config.status: creating cpuminer-config.h
config.status: executing depfiles commands

"make" command log
Code:
root@BDServer:/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi# make
make  all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi'
Making all in compat
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi/compat'
Making all in jansson
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi/compat/jansson'
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT dump.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/dump.Tpo -c -o dump.o dump.c
mv -f .deps/dump.Tpo .deps/dump.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT hashtable.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/hashtable.Tpo -c -o hashtable.o hashtable.c
mv -f .deps/hashtable.Tpo .deps/hashtable.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT load.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/load.Tpo -c -o load.o load.c
mv -f .deps/load.Tpo .deps/load.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT strbuffer.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/strbuffer.Tpo -c -o strbuffer.o strbuffer.c
mv -f .deps/strbuffer.Tpo .deps/strbuffer.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT utf.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/utf.Tpo -c -o utf.o utf.c
mv -f .deps/utf.Tpo .deps/utf.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT value.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/value.Tpo -c -o value.o value.c
mv -f .deps/value.Tpo .deps/value.Po
rm -f libjansson.a
ar cru libjansson.a dump.o hashtable.o load.o strbuffer.o utf.o value.o
ranlib libjansson.a
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi/compat/jansson'
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi/compat'
make[3]: Цель `all-am' не требует выполнения команд.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi/compat'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi/compat'
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi'
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread -I./compat/jansson   -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16  -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -maes  -march=native -MT minerd-cpu-miner.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/minerd-cpu-miner.Tpo -c -o minerd-cpu-miner.o `test -f 'cpu-miner.c' || echo './'`cpu-miner.c
mv -f .deps/minerd-cpu-miner.Tpo .deps/minerd-cpu-miner.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread -I./compat/jansson   -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16  -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -maes  -march=native -MT minerd-util.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/minerd-util.Tpo -c -o minerd-util.o `test -f 'util.c' || echo './'`util.c
mv -f .deps/minerd-util.Tpo .deps/minerd-util.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread -I./compat/jansson   -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16  -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -maes  -march=native -MT minerd-cryptonight_common.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/minerd-cryptonight_common.Tpo -c -o minerd-cryptonight_common.o `test -f 'cryptonight_common.c' || echo './'`cryptonight_common.c
mv -f .deps/minerd-cryptonight_common.Tpo .deps/minerd-cryptonight_common.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread -I./compat/jansson   -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16  -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -maes  -march=native -MT crypto/minerd-c_keccak.o -MD -MP -MF crypto/.deps/minerd-c_keccak.Tpo -c -o crypto/minerd-c_keccak.o `test -f 'crypto/c_keccak.c' || echo './'`crypto/c_keccak.c
crypto/c_keccak.c: In function ‘keccak’:
crypto/c_keccak.c:102:5: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘memset’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
crypto/c_keccak.c:102:5: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘memset’ [enabled by default]
crypto/c_keccak.c:111:5: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘memcpy’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
crypto/c_keccak.c:111:5: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘memcpy’ [enabled by default]
mv -f crypto/.deps/minerd-c_keccak.Tpo crypto/.deps/minerd-c_keccak.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread -I./compat/jansson   -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16  -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -maes  -march=native -MT crypto/minerd-c_groestl.o -MD -MP -MF crypto/.deps/minerd-c_groestl.Tpo -c -o crypto/minerd-c_groestl.o `test -f 'crypto/c_groestl.c' || echo './'`crypto/c_groestl.c
mv -f crypto/.deps/minerd-c_groestl.Tpo crypto/.deps/minerd-c_groestl.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread -I./compat/jansson   -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16  -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -maes  -march=native -MT crypto/minerd-c_blake256.o -MD -MP -MF crypto/.deps/minerd-c_blake256.Tpo -c -o crypto/minerd-c_blake256.o `test -f 'crypto/c_blake256.c' || echo './'`crypto/c_blake256.c
mv -f crypto/.deps/minerd-c_blake256.Tpo crypto/.deps/minerd-c_blake256.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread -I./compat/jansson   -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16  -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -maes  -march=native -MT crypto/minerd-c_jh.o -MD -MP -MF crypto/.deps/minerd-c_jh.Tpo -c -o crypto/minerd-c_jh.o `test -f 'crypto/c_jh.c' || echo './'`crypto/c_jh.c
mv -f crypto/.deps/minerd-c_jh.Tpo crypto/.deps/minerd-c_jh.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread -I./compat/jansson   -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16  -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -maes  -march=native -MT crypto/minerd-c_skein.o -MD -MP -MF crypto/.deps/minerd-c_skein.Tpo -c -o crypto/minerd-c_skein.o `test -f 'crypto/c_skein.c' || echo './'`crypto/c_skein.c
mv -f crypto/.deps/minerd-c_skein.Tpo crypto/.deps/minerd-c_skein.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread -I./compat/jansson   -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16  -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -maes  -march=native -MT minerd-cryptonight_aesni.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/minerd-cryptonight_aesni.Tpo -c -o minerd-cryptonight_aesni.o `test -f 'cryptonight_aesni.c' || echo './'`cryptonight_aesni.c
In file included from cryptonight.h:6:0,
                 from cryptonight_aesni.c:2:
miner.h:188:58: warning: ‘struct cryptonight_ctx’ declared inside parameter list [enabled by default]
cryptonight_aesni.c: In function ‘cryptonight_hash_ctx’:
cryptonight_aesni.c:90:2: warning: passing argument 3 of ‘keccak’ from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
In file included from cryptonight_aesni.c:2:0:
cryptonight.h:64:6: note: expected ‘uint8_t *’ but argument is of type ‘union hash_state *’
cryptonight_aesni.c:94:5: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘memcpy’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
cryptonight_aesni.c:94:5: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘memcpy’ [enabled by default]
cryptonight_aesni.c:172:18: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
cryptonight_aesni.c:215:2: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘keccakf’ from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
In file included from cryptonight_aesni.c:2:0:
cryptonight.h:65:6: note: expected ‘uint64_t *’ but argument is of type ‘union hash_state *’
cryptonight_aesni.c:162:4: error: impossible register constraint in ‘asm’
cryptonight_aesni.c:217:1: error: impossible register constraint in ‘asm’
cryptonight_aesni.c:217:1: error: impossible register constraint in ‘asm’
cryptonight_aesni.c:162:4: error: impossible register constraint in ‘asm’
cryptonight_aesni.c:217:1: error: impossible register constraint in ‘asm’
cryptonight_aesni.c:217:1: error: impossible register constraint in ‘asm’
make[2]: *** [minerd-cryptonight_aesni.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi'
make: *** [all] Error 2


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on February 20, 2015, 08:18:54 AM
Debian 7 - not work  :(
my system
Code:
root@BDServer:/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi# lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Debian
Description:    Debian GNU/Linux 7.8 (wheezy)
Release:        7.8
Codename:       wheezy

"./autogen.sh" command log
Code:
root@BDServer:/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi# ./autogen.sh
configure.ac:18: installing `./compile'
configure.ac:4: installing `./config.guess'
configure.ac:4: installing `./config.sub'
configure.ac:6: installing `./install-sh'
configure.ac:6: installing `./missing'

"./configure" command log
Code:
root@BDServer:/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi# ./configure CFLAGS="-march=native"
checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p
checking for gawk... no
checking for mawk... mawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking for suffix of executables...
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3
checking for gcc option to accept ISO C99... -std=gnu99
checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -std=gnu99 -E
checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /bin/grep
checking for egrep... /bin/grep -E
checking whether gcc -std=gnu99 needs -traditional... no
checking whether gcc -std=gnu99 and cc understand -c and -o together... yes
checking dependency style of gcc -std=gnu99... gcc3
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking for ANSI C header files... yes
checking for sys/types.h... yes
checking for sys/stat.h... yes
checking for stdlib.h... yes
checking for string.h... yes
checking for memory.h... yes
checking for strings.h... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking sys/endian.h usability... no
checking sys/endian.h presence... no
checking for sys/endian.h... no
checking sys/param.h usability... yes
checking sys/param.h presence... yes
checking for sys/param.h... yes
checking syslog.h usability... yes
checking syslog.h presence... yes
checking for syslog.h... yes
checking for sys/sysctl.h... yes
checking whether be32dec is declared... no
checking whether le32dec is declared... no
checking whether be32enc is declared... no
checking whether le32enc is declared... no
checking for size_t... yes
checking for working alloca.h... yes
checking for alloca... yes
checking for getopt_long... yes
checking whether we can compile AVX code... yes
checking whether we can compile XOP code... yes
checking whether we can compile AVX2 code... yes
checking for json_loads in -ljansson... no
checking for pthread_create in -lpthread... yes
checking for gawk... (cached) mawk
checking for curl-config... /usr/bin/curl-config
checking for the version of libcurl... 7.26.0
checking for libcurl >= version 7.15.2... yes
checking whether libcurl is usable... yes
checking for curl_free... yes
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating compat/Makefile
config.status: creating compat/jansson/Makefile
config.status: creating cpuminer-config.h
config.status: executing depfiles commands

"make" command log
Code:
root@BDServer:/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi# make
make  all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi'
Making all in compat
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi/compat'
Making all in jansson
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi/compat/jansson'
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT dump.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/dump.Tpo -c -o dump.o dump.c
mv -f .deps/dump.Tpo .deps/dump.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT hashtable.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/hashtable.Tpo -c -o hashtable.o hashtable.c
mv -f .deps/hashtable.Tpo .deps/hashtable.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT load.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/load.Tpo -c -o load.o load.c
mv -f .deps/load.Tpo .deps/load.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT strbuffer.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/strbuffer.Tpo -c -o strbuffer.o strbuffer.c
mv -f .deps/strbuffer.Tpo .deps/strbuffer.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT utf.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/utf.Tpo -c -o utf.o utf.c
mv -f .deps/utf.Tpo .deps/utf.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..     -march=native -MT value.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/value.Tpo -c -o value.o value.c
mv -f .deps/value.Tpo .deps/value.Po
rm -f libjansson.a
ar cru libjansson.a dump.o hashtable.o load.o strbuffer.o utf.o value.o
ranlib libjansson.a
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi/compat/jansson'
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi/compat'
make[3]: Цель `all-am' не требует выполнения команд.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi/compat'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi/compat'
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi'
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread -I./compat/jansson   -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16  -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -maes  -march=native -MT minerd-cpu-miner.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/minerd-cpu-miner.Tpo -c -o minerd-cpu-miner.o `test -f 'cpu-miner.c' || echo './'`cpu-miner.c
mv -f .deps/minerd-cpu-miner.Tpo .deps/minerd-cpu-miner.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread -I./compat/jansson   -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16  -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -maes  -march=native -MT minerd-util.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/minerd-util.Tpo -c -o minerd-util.o `test -f 'util.c' || echo './'`util.c
mv -f .deps/minerd-util.Tpo .deps/minerd-util.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread -I./compat/jansson   -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16  -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -maes  -march=native -MT minerd-cryptonight_common.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/minerd-cryptonight_common.Tpo -c -o minerd-cryptonight_common.o `test -f 'cryptonight_common.c' || echo './'`cryptonight_common.c
mv -f .deps/minerd-cryptonight_common.Tpo .deps/minerd-cryptonight_common.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread -I./compat/jansson   -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16  -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -maes  -march=native -MT crypto/minerd-c_keccak.o -MD -MP -MF crypto/.deps/minerd-c_keccak.Tpo -c -o crypto/minerd-c_keccak.o `test -f 'crypto/c_keccak.c' || echo './'`crypto/c_keccak.c
crypto/c_keccak.c: In function ‘keccak’:
crypto/c_keccak.c:102:5: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘memset’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
crypto/c_keccak.c:102:5: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘memset’ [enabled by default]
crypto/c_keccak.c:111:5: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘memcpy’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
crypto/c_keccak.c:111:5: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘memcpy’ [enabled by default]
mv -f crypto/.deps/minerd-c_keccak.Tpo crypto/.deps/minerd-c_keccak.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread -I./compat/jansson   -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16  -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -maes  -march=native -MT crypto/minerd-c_groestl.o -MD -MP -MF crypto/.deps/minerd-c_groestl.Tpo -c -o crypto/minerd-c_groestl.o `test -f 'crypto/c_groestl.c' || echo './'`crypto/c_groestl.c
mv -f crypto/.deps/minerd-c_groestl.Tpo crypto/.deps/minerd-c_groestl.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread -I./compat/jansson   -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16  -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -maes  -march=native -MT crypto/minerd-c_blake256.o -MD -MP -MF crypto/.deps/minerd-c_blake256.Tpo -c -o crypto/minerd-c_blake256.o `test -f 'crypto/c_blake256.c' || echo './'`crypto/c_blake256.c
mv -f crypto/.deps/minerd-c_blake256.Tpo crypto/.deps/minerd-c_blake256.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread -I./compat/jansson   -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16  -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -maes  -march=native -MT crypto/minerd-c_jh.o -MD -MP -MF crypto/.deps/minerd-c_jh.Tpo -c -o crypto/minerd-c_jh.o `test -f 'crypto/c_jh.c' || echo './'`crypto/c_jh.c
mv -f crypto/.deps/minerd-c_jh.Tpo crypto/.deps/minerd-c_jh.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread -I./compat/jansson   -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16  -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -maes  -march=native -MT crypto/minerd-c_skein.o -MD -MP -MF crypto/.deps/minerd-c_skein.Tpo -c -o crypto/minerd-c_skein.o `test -f 'crypto/c_skein.c' || echo './'`crypto/c_skein.c
mv -f crypto/.deps/minerd-c_skein.Tpo crypto/.deps/minerd-c_skein.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread -I./compat/jansson   -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16  -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -maes  -march=native -MT minerd-cryptonight_aesni.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/minerd-cryptonight_aesni.Tpo -c -o minerd-cryptonight_aesni.o `test -f 'cryptonight_aesni.c' || echo './'`cryptonight_aesni.c
In file included from cryptonight.h:6:0,
                 from cryptonight_aesni.c:2:
miner.h:188:58: warning: ‘struct cryptonight_ctx’ declared inside parameter list [enabled by default]
cryptonight_aesni.c: In function ‘cryptonight_hash_ctx’:
cryptonight_aesni.c:90:2: warning: passing argument 3 of ‘keccak’ from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
In file included from cryptonight_aesni.c:2:0:
cryptonight.h:64:6: note: expected ‘uint8_t *’ but argument is of type ‘union hash_state *’
cryptonight_aesni.c:94:5: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘memcpy’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
cryptonight_aesni.c:94:5: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘memcpy’ [enabled by default]
cryptonight_aesni.c:172:18: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
cryptonight_aesni.c:215:2: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘keccakf’ from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
In file included from cryptonight_aesni.c:2:0:
cryptonight.h:65:6: note: expected ‘uint64_t *’ but argument is of type ‘union hash_state *’
cryptonight_aesni.c:162:4: error: impossible register constraint in ‘asm’
cryptonight_aesni.c:217:1: error: impossible register constraint in ‘asm’
cryptonight_aesni.c:217:1: error: impossible register constraint in ‘asm’
cryptonight_aesni.c:162:4: error: impossible register constraint in ‘asm’
cryptonight_aesni.c:217:1: error: impossible register constraint in ‘asm’
cryptonight_aesni.c:217:1: error: impossible register constraint in ‘asm’
make[2]: *** [minerd-cryptonight_aesni.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/user_miner/cpuminer-multi'
make: *** [all] Error 2

Almost certain your system is 32-bit.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Molet on February 20, 2015, 08:33:36 AM
Almost certain your system is 32-bit.
damn, you're right  ::)
thx


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: firecrabby on March 28, 2015, 07:23:45 PM
Hey guys, what about Opteron 8222 - http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K8/AMD-Second%20Generation%20Opteron%208222%20-%20OSA8222GAA6CY%20(OSA8222CYWOF).html

How much h/s per core it will make?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: mirny on March 29, 2015, 01:48:16 AM
if you have it, try and let us know


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: smooth on March 29, 2015, 02:24:31 AM
Hey guys, what about Opteron 8222 - http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K8/AMD-Second%20Generation%20Opteron%208222%20-%20OSA8222GAA6CY%20(OSA8222CYWOF).html

How much h/s per core it will make?

With apparently only 1mb of cache per core and no aesni I would not expect a whole lot. Not worth it if you are paying for electricity.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: TradeManager on March 29, 2015, 03:05:10 PM
Hey guys, what about Opteron 8222 - http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K8/AMD-Second%20Generation%20Opteron%208222%20-%20OSA8222GAA6CY%20(OSA8222CYWOF).html

How much h/s per core it will make?

With apparently only 1mb of cache per core and no aesni I would not expect a whole lot. Not worth it if you are paying for electricity.

wolf im impressed with all the work you have done with your miners, keep on keepin on buddy! :)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: d0om on March 29, 2015, 04:49:59 PM
Ah, there it is. Does it still not work on VPS? If so, why not?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: DirtyUniverse on April 02, 2015, 10:24:25 PM
Hello, I just get this : http://puu.sh/gZmUL/90ec3d086a.png

why i cant see all outputs? I want see my hashrate..


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on April 02, 2015, 10:36:02 PM
Hello, I just get this : http://puu.sh/gZmUL/90ec3d086a.png

why i cant see all outputs? I want see my hashrate..

Dumping that to screen takes time, slowing the miner - which is why I removed it and only showed hashrate when a share is found.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: DirtyUniverse on April 02, 2015, 10:48:30 PM
Hello, I just get this : http://puu.sh/gZmUL/90ec3d086a.png

why i cant see all outputs? I want see my hashrate..

Dumping that to screen takes time, slowing the miner - which is why I removed it and only showed hashrate when a share is found.

i can reactive it?


Title: Hi! Where can I find minerd with support cryptonight for Windows 32 bit?
Post by: gorserg on April 03, 2015, 10:23:55 AM
Hi! Where can I find minerd with support cryptonight for Windows 32 bit?


Title: Re: Hi! Where can I find minerd with support cryptonight for Windows 32 bit?
Post by: Rytir_fik on April 03, 2015, 11:23:24 AM
Hi! Where can I find minerd with support cryptonight for Windows 32 bit?
32 bit is not supported. :'(


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on April 05, 2015, 01:13:02 AM
Hello, I just get this : http://puu.sh/gZmUL/90ec3d086a.png

why i cant see all outputs? I want see my hashrate..

Dumping that to screen takes time, slowing the miner - which is why I removed it and only showed hashrate when a share is found.

i can reactive it?

No, I didn't say I deactivated it, I removed it.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: DirtyUniverse on April 05, 2015, 09:49:20 PM
Hello, I just get this : http://puu.sh/gZmUL/90ec3d086a.png

why i cant see all outputs? I want see my hashrate..

Dumping that to screen takes time, slowing the miner - which is why I removed it and only showed hashrate when a share is found.

i can reactive it?

No, I didn't say I deactivated it, I removed it.
Okay boss.
Now  i have another question.. How i can compile on freebsd x64? When  i try make, i got errors..


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on April 07, 2015, 03:13:57 AM
Hello, I just get this : http://puu.sh/gZmUL/90ec3d086a.png

why i cant see all outputs? I want see my hashrate..

Dumping that to screen takes time, slowing the miner - which is why I removed it and only showed hashrate when a share is found.

i can reactive it?

No, I didn't say I deactivated it, I removed it.
Okay boss.
Now  i have another question.. How i can compile on freebsd x64? When  i try make, i got errors..

Check ./configure --help -- there should be an option to disable memory optimizations. Use make distclean, re-configure with that option, and make again.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: ashfaq on June 01, 2015, 12:19:19 PM
so we cant mine with 32 bit ???????


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: sonny8888 on June 12, 2015, 10:01:21 AM
I only have 150H/s on 2 Xeon L5639s

Help ??? ??? ???


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Mysteriousdewd on June 18, 2015, 11:57:02 PM
Hi,
I am trying to compile on Mac, but I receive this error when I 'make'
Quote
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread   -Qunused-arguments -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16  -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -maes   -MT minerd-cpu-miner.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/minerd-cpu-miner.Tpo -c -o minerd-cpu-miner.o `test -f 'cpu-miner.c' || echo './'`cpu-miner.c
clang: error: unknown argument: '-falign-loops=16' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-falign-jumps=16' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-falign-labels=16' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-fuse-linker-plugin' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-fvariable-expansion-in-unroller' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-ftree-loop-if-convert-stores' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-fbranch-target-load-optimize2' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-fsched2-use-superblocks' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
make[2]: *** [minerd-cpu-miner.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2

I have the dependencies installed. 'autogen.sh' and 'configure' run without errors.

I am having the same issue as this person but I see no one has suggested a solution. Could someone help me out with this. I was told to use a makefile from cpuminer-multi and thought all I would need to do is copy it from there and paste into wolfs-m7m folder but when I attempted to configure/make it it only hit me with errors.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on June 19, 2015, 01:05:01 AM
Hi,
I am trying to compile on Mac, but I receive this error when I 'make'
Quote
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread   -Qunused-arguments -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16  -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -maes   -MT minerd-cpu-miner.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/minerd-cpu-miner.Tpo -c -o minerd-cpu-miner.o `test -f 'cpu-miner.c' || echo './'`cpu-miner.c
clang: error: unknown argument: '-falign-loops=16' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-falign-jumps=16' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-falign-labels=16' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-fuse-linker-plugin' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-fvariable-expansion-in-unroller' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-ftree-loop-if-convert-stores' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-fbranch-target-load-optimize2' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-fsched2-use-superblocks' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
make[2]: *** [minerd-cpu-miner.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2

I have the dependencies installed. 'autogen.sh' and 'configure' run without errors.

I am having the same issue as this person but I see no one has suggested a solution. Could someone help me out with this. I was told to use a makefile from cpuminer-multi and thought all I would need to do is copy it from there and paste into wolfs-m7m folder but when I attempted to configure/make it it only hit me with errors.

It's not meant for clang - use GCC, or remove the arguments clang takes issue with.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/MNT CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: pallas on June 19, 2015, 09:09:58 AM
Hi,
I am trying to compile on Mac, but I receive this error when I 'make'
Quote
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread   -Qunused-arguments -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16  -Ofast -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -fmerge-all-constants -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -maes   -MT minerd-cpu-miner.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/minerd-cpu-miner.Tpo -c -o minerd-cpu-miner.o `test -f 'cpu-miner.c' || echo './'`cpu-miner.c
clang: error: unknown argument: '-falign-loops=16' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-falign-jumps=16' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-falign-labels=16' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-fuse-linker-plugin' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-fvariable-expansion-in-unroller' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-ftree-loop-if-convert-stores' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-fbranch-target-load-optimize2' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
clang: error: unknown argument: '-fsched2-use-superblocks' [-Wunused-command-line-argument-hard-error-in-future]
clang: note: this will be a hard error (cannot be downgraded to a warning) in the future
make[2]: *** [minerd-cpu-miner.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2

I have the dependencies installed. 'autogen.sh' and 'configure' run without errors.

I am having the same issue as this person but I see no one has suggested a solution. Could someone help me out with this. I was told to use a makefile from cpuminer-multi and thought all I would need to do is copy it from there and paste into wolfs-m7m folder but when I attempted to configure/make it it only hit me with errors.

It's not meant for clang - use GCC, or remove the arguments clang takes issue with.

BTW I compiled it with clang on linux some months ago and it was slower.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: DirtyUniverse on June 27, 2015, 12:24:43 AM
There any binary for FreeBSD 10.x 64bit ? also i have AES-ni supported cpu.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Moria843 on August 16, 2015, 09:02:57 PM
Why do I get this warning when I try to download latest miner? ???

Quote
What is the current listing status for ottrbutt.com?
Site is listed as suspicious - visiting this web site may harm your computer.

Part of this site was listed for suspicious activity 6 time(s) over the past 90 days.

What happened when Google visited this site?
Of the 18 pages we tested on the site over the past 90 days, 3 page(s) resulted in malicious software being downloaded and installed without user consent. The last time Google visited this site was on 2015-08-16, and the last time suspicious content was found on this site was on 2015-08-16.
Malicious software includes 41 trojan(s).

What can you expect from cpu mining with the mid range Core i7 running Windows?

Solo mining of XMR still done or pools?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Indianacoin on September 18, 2015, 12:36:24 PM
Why do I get this warning when I try to download latest miner? ???

Quote
What is the current listing status for ottrbutt.com?
Site is listed as suspicious - visiting this web site may harm your computer.

Part of this site was listed for suspicious activity 6 time(s) over the past 90 days.

What happened when Google visited this site?
Of the 18 pages we tested on the site over the past 90 days, 3 page(s) resulted in malicious software being downloaded and installed without user consent. The last time Google visited this site was on 2015-08-16, and the last time suspicious content was found on this site was on 2015-08-16.
Malicious software includes 41 trojan(s).

Same thought came to my mind !  ???  :o


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Gimmelfarb on October 14, 2015, 02:39:42 AM
If you are mining with GPUs, this thread might be of interest for those looking for new GPUs with nice discounts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1207919


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Eastwind on October 14, 2015, 11:50:33 AM
If you are mining with GPUs, this thread might be of interest for those looking for new GPUs with nice discounts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1207919

It is difficult to mine profitably with GPU nowadays.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on November 26, 2015, 06:36:54 PM
Why do I get this warning when I try to download latest miner? ???

Quote
What is the current listing status for ottrbutt.com?
Site is listed as suspicious - visiting this web site may harm your computer.

Part of this site was listed for suspicious activity 6 time(s) over the past 90 days.

What happened when Google visited this site?
Of the 18 pages we tested on the site over the past 90 days, 3 page(s) resulted in malicious software being downloaded and installed without user consent. The last time Google visited this site was on 2015-08-16, and the last time suspicious content was found on this site was on 2015-08-16.
Malicious software includes 41 trojan(s).

Same thought came to my mind !  ???  :o

It's because my site hosts miner executables. Since botnets often use miners, they immediately flag ALL miners as malware.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: smooth on November 26, 2015, 07:23:14 PM
Why do I get this warning when I try to download latest miner? ???

Quote
What is the current listing status for ottrbutt.com?
Site is listed as suspicious - visiting this web site may harm your computer.

Part of this site was listed for suspicious activity 6 time(s) over the past 90 days.

What happened when Google visited this site?
Of the 18 pages we tested on the site over the past 90 days, 3 page(s) resulted in malicious software being downloaded and installed without user consent. The last time Google visited this site was on 2015-08-16, and the last time suspicious content was found on this site was on 2015-08-16.
Malicious software includes 41 trojan(s).

Same thought came to my mind !  ???  :o

It's because my site hosts miner executables. Since botnets often use miners, they immediately flag ALL miners as malware.

I'd try opening a ticket with google and asking them to stop making false statements about your site (assuming of course that your site doesn't do that)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Valerian77 on January 02, 2016, 11:46:27 AM
a virustotal.com scan of the latest Wolff CPU miner:
https://www.virustotal.com/de/file/126395638de030e60d4a3a5cf7a8f8b664aac9ca37dc9a766182f8dfd5228fe4/analysis/ (https://www.virustotal.com/de/file/126395638de030e60d4a3a5cf7a8f8b664aac9ca37dc9a766182f8dfd5228fe4/analysis/)

Quote
Erkennungsrate:    33 / 55

Opinions?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: altsay on January 06, 2016, 01:34:06 PM
Could anyone provide an up-to-date info and/or opinion about CPU mining of XMR? This thread looks deserted, a little.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Valerian77 on January 07, 2016, 12:43:58 PM
Could anyone provide an up-to-date info and/or opinion about CPU mining of XMR? This thread looks deserted, a little.

some links:

https://getmonero.org/ (https://getmonero.org/)
Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.0)
Monero configurations - Google Tabellen (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MI-ic0Os25hgGUImW54sUIjZY_pUNQNa_W8Se5pRGBs/edit?pli=1#gid=0)
Mining software and pools  (https://forum.getmonero.org/13/mining-software-and-pools)
Monero – Aufsetzen eines vollwertigen Netzwerkknotens unter Linux (http://blog.carl.pro/2015/10/monero-aufsetzen-eines-vollwertigen-netzwerkknotens-unter-linux/)
https://moneropool.com/ (https://moneropool.com/)
http://minexmr.com/ (http://minexmr.com/)
http://moneroblocks.eu/ (http://moneroblocks.eu/)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: kopam on January 09, 2016, 04:37:57 PM
So what is the best miner for x11 right now and what speeds could one expect?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: pallas on January 09, 2016, 05:33:39 PM
So what is the best miner for x11 right now and what speeds could one expect?

Not strictly on topic is it? :-)
And are you talking about cpu mining? In that case, forget x11.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Mastker on January 10, 2016, 01:44:51 PM
So what is the best miner for x11 right now and what speeds could one expect?

Not strictly on topic is it? :-)
And are you talking about cpu mining? In that case, forget x11.

CPU mining is only for XMG, Monero etc and BBR. X11 is too inefficient to CPU mine.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: joblo on January 11, 2016, 06:55:47 PM
So what is the best miner for x11 right now and what speeds could one expect?

Not strictly on topic is it? :-)
And are you talking about cpu mining? In that case, forget x11.

CPU mining is only for XMG, Monero etc and BBR. X11 is too inefficient to CPU mine.

Darkcoin CPU Miner 1.3 is the fasted x11 miner I've found, but I agree cpu mining x11 is a waste.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: calculatorduck on March 18, 2016, 04:15:29 AM
I'm trying to use this on dwarfpool to mine monero but it doesn't seem to be working. Other miners work fine.

Anyone else having issues?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: dewdeded on March 20, 2016, 09:44:48 AM
No issues, with moneropool.com.
At least, with various different current and older versions of Ubuntu & Debian.
Never tried with other operating systems.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: perl on March 22, 2016, 07:43:39 PM
I have add methode keepalived for prevent timeout :)

https://github.com/wolf9466/cpuminer-multi/pull/6


18H mining and no timeout :)
http://pastebin.com/Xz3At4hm
accepted: 1522/1522 (100.00%), 356.66 H/s at diff 16000 (yay!!!)
accepted: 1523/1523 (100.00%), 370.52 H/s at diff 16000 (yay!!!)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: narousberg on March 25, 2016, 04:51:01 PM
Good day guys, i need info how i can connect my mac machine to the Monero mining pool, which software i need. Maybe anyone have ready OSX miner build.
Thanks


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: alevlaslo on April 04, 2016, 06:42:16 AM
What miner for i7 4820k on win64 good?

I have 120h only, but this another information: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MI-ic0Os25hgGUImW54sUIjZY_pUNQNa_W8Se5pRGBs/edit?pli=1#gid=0


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: hipihopa on April 05, 2016, 03:31:51 PM
What miner for i7 4820k on win64 good?

I have 120h only, but this another information: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MI-ic0Os25hgGUImW54sUIjZY_pUNQNa_W8Se5pRGBs/edit?pli=1#gid=0
I get on my amd fx6100 on 4 core 140-160h/s  on 6 core 200-220h/s
minerd -s 4 -t 8 -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://monero.cryptopool.online:3333 -u (your-wallet) -p x
try this


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Bitock on April 08, 2016, 08:13:00 PM
Hi! When i can get the latest cpu miner for xmr?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: barnbarn122 on April 11, 2016, 04:04:20 AM
Dual Xeon X5650s @ 2.66GHz (-t 12): 135H/s

i7 6700k @ 4.4GHz (-t 4): 172H/s


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: nioc on April 11, 2016, 09:28:30 AM
Dual Xeon X5650s @ 2.66GHz (-t 12): 135H/s

i7 6700k @ 4.4GHz (-t 4): 172H/s

The Xeon has 12MB of L3 cache so I suggest you try -t 6 because each thread optimally uses 2MB of L3 cache.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: barnbarn122 on April 11, 2016, 07:38:33 PM
Dual Xeon X5650s @ 2.66GHz (-t 12): 135H/s

i7 6700k @ 4.4GHz (-t 4): 172H/s

The Xeon has 12MB of L3 cache so I suggest you try -t 6 because each thread optimally uses 2MB of L3 cache.

88H/s


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: NewBTCGuy on May 22, 2016, 03:35:14 PM
Good day guys, i need info how i can connect my mac machine to the Monero mining pool, which software i need. Maybe anyone have ready OSX miner build.
Thanks

I see you didn't get any replies.  So though I am a total newb at this, I'll share my experience thus far with Macs and maybe you can share back what you've learned since you posted 2 months ago.

I fist tried minergate.com's mac client and got the following results CPU mining XMR:

Harpertown 2.8Ghz 8 Core Mac Pro (4GB RAM) - 175H/s
Nehelem 2.8Ghz 4 Core Mac Pro (8GB RAM) - 85H/s
Core i7 2.6Ghz MacBook Pro (16GB RAM) - 75H/s 90H/s

In other words, totally not worth it.

I'm just now installing Ubuntu on the Harpertown Mac Pro and will try both Minergate and Wolf's if the Minergate hashrate under Linusx is lower than what reports for Wolf's have been here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MI-ic0Os25hgGUImW54sUIjZY_pUNQNa_W8Se5pRGBs/edit?pli=1#gid=0

Edit: Unbuntu Minergate on Harpertown Mac Pro - 190H/s


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: silversurfer1958 on July 18, 2016, 03:04:55 AM
I'm on   Dell E5300 2.3Ghz and get about 8H/s at minergate.      :-[
My Laptop gives about the same using Minergate.    :'(

two mobile devices, using 2 cores  give about 5H/s (5 hashes per second)   :-\

How can I improve on this.





Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Anonymailer on July 26, 2016, 10:55:46 PM
Good day guys, i need info how i can connect my mac machine to the Monero mining pool, which software i need. Maybe anyone have ready OSX miner build.
Thanks

I see you didn't get any replies.  So though I am a total newb at this, I'll share my experience thus far with Macs and maybe you can share back what you've learned since you posted 2 months ago.

I fist tried minergate.com's mac client and got the following results CPU mining XMR:

Harpertown 2.8Ghz 8 Core Mac Pro (4GB RAM) - 175H/s
Nehelem 2.8Ghz 4 Core Mac Pro (8GB RAM) - 85H/s
Core i7 2.6Ghz MacBook Pro (16GB RAM) - 75H/s 90H/s

In other words, totally not worth it.

I'm just now installing Ubuntu on the Harpertown Mac Pro and will try both Minergate and Wolf's if the Minergate hashrate under Linusx is lower than what reports for Wolf's have been here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MI-ic0Os25hgGUImW54sUIjZY_pUNQNa_W8Se5pRGBs/edit?pli=1#gid=0

Edit: Unbuntu Minergate on Harpertown Mac Pro - 190H/s

Compiled this for macOS and included it in MacMiner and I get 190H/s on a 12 core mid-2012 Mac Pro


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: phatkiller on July 28, 2016, 07:30:45 AM
Anyone know where I can find 32 bit version for linux and windows ?

I know Claymore CPU miner and Minergate both have 32 bit version there has to be an open source one somewhere.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: pitbred on July 28, 2016, 02:52:19 PM
Anyone know where I can find 32 bit version for linux and windows ?

I know Claymore CPU miner and Minergate both have 32 bit version there has to be an open source one somewhere.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=632724.msg7058853#msg7058853


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: EvilC0P on August 01, 2016, 02:25:29 AM
I started a few days ago mining XMR, here's some information i got to share

2x Xeon E5-2620 v2 ( 12 threads ea)   ~350 h/s
Quadro K2200   ~190 h/s
   
2x Xeon E5-2620 v2 ( 12 threads ea)   ~350 h/s
Quadro K2000   fail
   
2x Xeon E5-2620 v2 ( 12 threads ea)   ~350 h/s
Quadro K2000   fail
   
2x Xeon E5-2620 v3 ( 12 threads ea)   ~402 h/s
Quadro K2200   ~190 h/s

on my i7 3820 i get ~180 h/s
on my Geforce GTX 760 i get between 180-240 h/s ; very variable.

i use cpuminer-sandybridge-ivybridge.exe from cpuminer-multi-wolf-05-30-2014 ; -t 20 for the Xeon systems and -t 5 on my i7 3820
and for the gpu i use Cryptominer

I was wondering if anyone had any tips to tweak/improve my numbers and also, if anyone has any idea why it fails on a Quadro K2000 but not on a K2200

have fun :)

**updated -t settings


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Anuddabizraeli on August 25, 2016, 05:13:30 AM
I cannot get the miner to work. It pulls the error: Error -1 when calling clGetDeviceIDs for number of devices.

I have an AMD r9 290 running Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit. I can't find any solution searching about. The closest relevant thing I saw suggested I cannot use the HDMI port on my GPU to connect to my monitor?

My full specs are:
OS:   Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate
Version:   6.1.7601 Service Pack 1 Build 7601
System Model:   B85M-DS3H-A
System Type:   x64-based PC
Processor:   Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4460  CPU @ 3.20GHz, 3201 Mhz, 4 Core(s), 4 Logical Processor(s)
GPU: AMD r9 290 Sapphire Tri-X
BIOS Version/Date:   American Megatrends Inc. F1, 1/19/2015
SMBIOS Version:   2.7
Hardware Abstraction Layer   Version = "6.1.7601.17514"
Installed Physical Memory (RAM):   8.00 GB
Total Physical Memory:   7.90 GB
Available Physical Memory:   5.79 GB
Total Virtual Memory:   15.8 GB
Available Virtual Memory:   12.8 GB




Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: capone1340 on August 28, 2016, 01:54:07 PM
I cannot get the miner to work. It pulls the error: Error -1 when calling clGetDeviceIDs for number of devices.

I have an AMD r9 290 running Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit. I can't find any solution searching about. The closest relevant thing I saw suggested I cannot use the HDMI port on my GPU to connect to my monitor?

My full specs are:
OS:   Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate
Version:   6.1.7601 Service Pack 1 Build 7601
System Model:   B85M-DS3H-A
System Type:   x64-based PC
Processor:   Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4460  CPU @ 3.20GHz, 3201 Mhz, 4 Core(s), 4 Logical Processor(s)
GPU: AMD r9 290 Sapphire Tri-X
BIOS Version/Date:   American Megatrends Inc. F1, 1/19/2015
SMBIOS Version:   2.7
Hardware Abstraction Layer   Version = "6.1.7601.17514"
Installed Physical Memory (RAM):   8.00 GB
Total Physical Memory:   7.90 GB
Available Physical Memory:   5.79 GB
Total Virtual Memory:   15.8 GB
Available Virtual Memory:   12.8 GB



i guess is only CPU miner and you try with GPU


edit l was wrong yes you can used you GPU go here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=638915.0


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: callmecough on August 29, 2016, 08:26:33 AM
Hi,

I wonder if anyone tried to use any virtualization soft for mining? For example, openVZ etc. It is interesting if several VE running miner are more profitable than one on a whole server?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: tracercho on August 29, 2016, 02:42:11 PM
Hello,

I have a problem building this miner. I am trying to build it in Linux 16.04 64bit with mingw32. I am configuring like that :

 sudo ./configure --host=i586-mingw32msvc

Then I have this error after sudo make :

cc1: error: invalid option argument ‘-Ofast’
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-flto"
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-fuse-linker-plugin"
Makefile:526: recipe for target 'minerd-cpu-miner.o' failed
make[2]: *** [minerd-cpu-miner.o] Error 1


I tried to remove this lines in the Makefile, but then I got other error. Does somebody have some idea how to fix that?

Thanks in advance !


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Wolf0 on August 29, 2016, 02:44:29 PM
Hello,

I have a problem building this miner. I am trying to build it in Linux 16.04 64bit with mingw32. I am configuring like that :

 sudo ./configure --host=i586-mingw32msvc

Then I have this error after sudo make :

cc1: error: invalid option argument ‘-Ofast’
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-flto"
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-fuse-linker-plugin"
Makefile:526: recipe for target 'minerd-cpu-miner.o' failed
make[2]: *** [minerd-cpu-miner.o] Error 1


I tried to remove this lines in the Makefile, but then I got other error. Does somebody have some idea how to fix that?

Thanks in advance !

Probably some old ass toolchain - I build my own cross-toolchains for this very reason, most of the ones you can find are hopelessly out of date.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: mikhan on August 30, 2016, 03:08:15 AM
dual E5-2690v3, total 24 cores, 48 threads - 648 H/s


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: wubulubudubdub73 on September 03, 2016, 08:01:48 PM
Trying out mining Monero for the first time. When I first ran the cpu miner I got "Stratum detected new block" over and over, cpu running at 100%. Am I even mining?

Trying the second time I now get:
[2016-09-03 15:48:41] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2016-09-03 15:48:41] HTTP request failed: Protocol stratum+tcp not supported or disabled in libcurl
[2016-09-03 15:48:41] 11 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
[2016-09-03 15:48:41] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2016-09-03 15:48:51] HTTP request failed: Protocol stratum+tcp not supported or disabled in libcurl
[2016-09-03 15:48:51] ...retry after 10 seconds


Any help? I cannot find much troubleshooting info online


EDIT:

Trying out the GPU miner, all I did was change the pool address and wallet address in xmr.conf and I get:

[16:08:38] Got something: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"your IP is banned"}}

[16:08:38] Share rejected ((null)): -1/0 (inf%)
[16:08:38] Total Hashrate: nanH/s

wtf?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Etherion on September 05, 2016, 08:27:59 AM
My antivirus detects Troj/Miner-AB in the windows exe. I used the link on this forum to download.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: jkminkov on September 05, 2016, 11:09:56 AM
Trying out mining Monero for the first time. When I first ran the cpu miner I got "Stratum detected new block" over and over, cpu running at 100%. Am I even mining?

Trying the second time I now get:
[2016-09-03 15:48:41] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2016-09-03 15:48:41] HTTP request failed: Protocol stratum+tcp not supported or disabled in libcurl
[2016-09-03 15:48:41] 11 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
[2016-09-03 15:48:41] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2016-09-03 15:48:51] HTTP request failed: Protocol stratum+tcp not supported or disabled in libcurl
[2016-09-03 15:48:51] ...retry after 10 seconds


Any help? I cannot find much troubleshooting info online


EDIT:

Trying out the GPU miner, all I did was change the pool address and wallet address in xmr.conf and I get:

[16:08:38] Got something: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"your IP is banned"}}

[16:08:38] Share rejected ((null)): -1/0 (inf%)
[16:08:38] Total Hashrate: nanH/s

wtf?

f'off botnet puppeteer!


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: nioc on September 05, 2016, 11:24:06 AM
My antivirus detects Troj/Miner-AB in the windows exe. I used the link on this forum to download.

All anti virus detects CPU miners as viruses/trojans because of botnets.  Ofc that doesn't mean some aren't but this one is just fine and I have used it with no problems.  Wolf has a very good rep.  You should add it to your anti viruses trusted list so it doesn't mess with it later.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: dewdeded on September 05, 2016, 12:19:13 PM
Hi,

I wonder if anyone tried to use any virtualization soft for mining? For example, openVZ etc. It is interesting if several VE running miner are more profitable than one on a whole server?
I mined on all well-known virtualizers: KVM, XEN, OpenVZ, Proxmox, SolusVM and some custom stacks like Jelastic. No problems.
Before booking VPS, check if you have AES-NI on VPS. With-out AES-NI it's slower. A lot slower, around 1/3rd the speed. And the non AES-NI implementation is deprecated and will not be improved.


Never benchmarked.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: calculatorduck on September 05, 2016, 02:26:31 PM
Tried a couple pools and this is the result:

[2016-09-05 10:00:18] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-05 10:00:49] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-05 10:01:34] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-05 10:02:05] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-05 10:03:40] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-05 10:05:40] Stratum connection timed out
[2016-09-05 10:05:40] Stratum connection interrupted
[2016-09-05 10:05:40] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-05 10:08:16] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-05 10:08:57] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-05 10:11:56] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-05 10:13:56] Stratum connection timed out
[2016-09-05 10:13:56] Stratum connection interrupted
[2016-09-05 10:13:56] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-05 10:14:31] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-05 10:15:16] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-05 10:15:42] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-05 10:17:42] Stratum connection timed out
[2016-09-05 10:17:42] Stratum connection interrupted
[2016-09-05 10:17:42] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-05 10:19:42] Stratum connection timed out
[2016-09-05 10:19:42] Stratum connection interrupted
[2016-09-05 10:19:43] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-05 10:20:40] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-05 10:21:32] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-05 10:21:47] Stratum detected new block

What am I doing wrong?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: willi9974 on September 06, 2016, 09:48:27 PM
at the moment i use the claymore miner, but i will use the wolf miner.

i have the speed from 3,8 kh/s

09/06/16-20:45:59 - New job received from mine.moneropool.com:3333
Speed: 3859 h/s, TotalHashes: 5543K, DevHashes: 137K Mining time: 00:24

how can i configure the wolf miner and what are the best settings for a AMD 480'er system with 6 cards




BestRegards
Willi


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: mirny on September 07, 2016, 03:26:45 AM
This is a CPU mining thread, not GPU.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: CaptainN00b on September 07, 2016, 06:52:36 PM
Hi guys,

based on Ubuntu Mate 16.04.1, I was able to build Wolf's miner from github as follows:

Code:
# install build tools and libs
sudo apt-get install build-essential autotools-dev autoconf pkgconf libtool

# get, build (statically) and install curl
wget https://curl.haxx.se/download/curl-7.50.1.tar.gz
tar xvfz curl-7.50.1.tar.gz
cd curl-7.50.1
./configure --disable-shared --enable-static --prefix=/tmp/curl --disable-ldap --disable-sspi
make
sudo make install;
cd ..

# build miner (statically)
unzip cpuminer-multi-master.zip
cd cpuminer-multi-master
./autogen.sh
./configure CFLAGS="-static" --with-libcurl=/tmp/curl
make

# confirm miner is entirely static
ldd minerd

I'm not entirely sure, whether I'm doing it formally right, but the resulting binary works as expected and all our boxes (also on those that don't run the dynamically-linked build due to lack of libs). So far, so good.

Here's my question:
How do I change the build process, such that I get an .so library instead of a binary for the miner. I would like to use the .so as sort of a plugin in a bigger Java-based application, that invokes C(++)-based library functions using JNA. I would now like to include Wolf's miner, too. Please note, that I do not want to use ProcessBuilder and similar to run the ordinarily built binary. The question here refers specifically to building a library from the miner code.

Thanks,
CaptainN00b


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: tracercho on September 08, 2016, 05:17:46 PM
Hello, I am having problems to build wolf-cpuminer on ubuntu 16.04,14.04 using mingw32. I compile it easily for linux, but i would like to compile it for windows. I am having  this problem after: sudo make and this is my configure command : sudo ./configure --host=i586-mingw32msvc

cc1: error: invalid option argument ?-Ofast?
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-flto"
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-fuse-linker-plugin"
 ??? ??? ???
and when I go to Makefile and delete these lines, i am having other errors. I am not sure, i am on the right place for asking this question, but I hope  somebody may have a clue what to do.

Thanks in advance !  :)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: fibble on September 10, 2016, 11:51:17 PM
Found this after using yam and its increased my hashrate and of course is open source.

Cheers mate. Donated ~0.0033BTC change i had in a wallet. Thanks, keep up the good work.



Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: OhGodAGirl on September 11, 2016, 11:15:05 AM
Holy moly I forgot about this. Two years?

Might be time for an update, pet.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: CoinBreader on September 13, 2016, 07:05:42 AM
Hey guys,
Can someone share his minerd .bat file need to do some tests on a i7 980x , thanks in advance !


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: NeuroticFish on September 13, 2016, 07:14:49 AM
Hey guys,
Can someone share his minerd .bat file need to do some tests on a i7 980x , thanks in advance !

Any pool you want to use has this in the getting started area.
Code:
minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://pool.minexmr.com:4444 -u YOUR_WALLET_ADDRESS -p x
And yes, you need to have a wallet for this, although, if you only make a short test you will not be able to withdraw, so any publicly available XMR address will do.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: CoinBreader on September 13, 2016, 01:14:57 PM
Hey guys,
Can someone share his minerd .bat file need to do some tests on a i7 980x , thanks in advance !

Any pool you want to use has this in the getting started area.
Code:
minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://pool.minexmr.com:4444 -u YOUR_WALLET_ADDRESS -p x
And yes, you need to have a wallet for this, although, if you only make a short test you will not be able to withdraw, so any publicly available XMR address will do.

thanks for the reply , im gonna use wolfs wallet address


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: tracercho on September 19, 2016, 04:14:27 PM
Is there anybody who successfully compiled monero (wolf-cpu) miner ?  :)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: 2beFree on September 21, 2016, 08:41:57 AM
Does anyone know, why when I try to download this version of the miner: https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-09-2014.zip
(from the first page of this discussion), it gives me the following error:
"Not Found
The requested URL /cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-09-2014.zip was not found on this server."
Where can I download the latest version of cpuminer-multi-wolf?
Thank you in advance Friends! ;)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: superresistant on September 21, 2016, 07:29:05 PM
Is there anybody who successfully compiled monero (wolf-cpu) miner ?  :)

Check this tutorial :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1614177.0


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: gipsy on September 23, 2016, 08:33:11 AM
Hello, i try to install the miner on a Centos but im having problems... i get this error:

"[root@: cpuminer-multi-master]# ./autogen.sh
configure.ac:3: error: Autoconf version 2.68 or higher is required
configure.ac:3: the top level
autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 63
aclocal: autom4te failed with exit status: 63"

I try to install autoconf version 2.68 but still is not working. Can someone explain me step by step how to start mine Monero?

I had downloaded on CentOS this miner "cpuminer-multi-master" and when i hit ./autoget.sh i get the error above.

Thank you.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: jjiimm_64 on September 30, 2016, 12:15:45 PM
This is a CPU mining thread, not GPU.

just tried the cpu miner.. pretty sure it is working, but I dont see the speed.. is there a display setting to show hash amount?

Code:
C:\install\xmr\cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-12-2014>minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://monerohash.com:3333 -u mywallet -p x
[2016-09-30 08:08:10] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2016-09-30 08:08:10] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://monerohash.com:3333
[2016-09-30 08:08:10] 5 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
[2016-09-30 08:08:10] Pool set diff to 5000
[2016-09-30 08:08:10] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-30 08:10:38] Pool set diff to 3401
[2016-09-30 08:10:38] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-30 08:13:08] Pool set diff to 2252
[2016-09-30 08:13:08] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-30 08:13:59] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-30 08:15:28] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-30 08:15:39] Pool set diff to 1491
[2016-09-30 08:15:39] Stratum detected new block




Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: nioc on September 30, 2016, 02:01:56 PM
This is a CPU mining thread, not GPU.

just tried the cpu miner.. pretty sure it is working, but I dont see the speed.. is there a display setting to show hash amount?

Code:
C:\install\xmr\cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-12-2014>minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://monerohash.com:3333 -u mywallet -p x
[2016-09-30 08:08:10] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2016-09-30 08:08:10] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://monerohash.com:3333
[2016-09-30 08:08:10] 5 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
[2016-09-30 08:08:10] Pool set diff to 5000
[2016-09-30 08:08:10] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-30 08:10:38] Pool set diff to 3401
[2016-09-30 08:10:38] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-30 08:13:08] Pool set diff to 2252
[2016-09-30 08:13:08] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-30 08:13:59] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-30 08:15:28] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-30 08:15:39] Pool set diff to 1491
[2016-09-30 08:15:39] Stratum detected new block



looks like you haven't had any shares accepted so you don't see the speed.  I see that you started at a diff of 5000 and the miner keeps reducing the diff because it's too high.  Eventually it will adjust but you should start with a port with a lower diff as it seems you have a slow CPU for Monero.  There are pools that have lower starting diffs and http://mine.moneroworld.com/ has a slowly adjusting diff which is good for slow miners as the diff doesn't jump up which can cause time outs when the diff adjusts up too quickly.  If your CPU does not have AES-NI it will be slow.  Also note that you need 2MB of cache for each thread you run.  I have an i5 with 6MB cache and it works better with 2 of the 4 cores instead of 3 because the cache is shared.  I had an old pentium that was getting ~33 H/s and at that rate with present conditions it would take close to 5 months to mine 1 Monero :P

BTW when shares are accepted it will look like this:
[2016-09-30 09:58:44] accepted: 11482/11482 (100.00%), 90.50 H/s at diff 2643 (yay!!!)

You should also see something like this before shares are accepted:
[2016-09-30 10:00:33] thread 1: 2671 hashes, 43.15 H/s


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: jjiimm_64 on September 30, 2016, 03:08:58 PM
This is a CPU mining thread, not GPU.

just tried the cpu miner.. pretty sure it is working, but I dont see the speed.. is there a display setting to show hash amount?

Code:
C:\install\xmr\cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-12-2014>minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://monerohash.com:3333 -u mywallet -p x
[2016-09-30 08:08:10] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2016-09-30 08:08:10] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://monerohash.com:3333
[2016-09-30 08:08:10] 5 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
[2016-09-30 08:08:10] Pool set diff to 5000
[2016-09-30 08:08:10] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-30 08:10:38] Pool set diff to 3401
[2016-09-30 08:10:38] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-30 08:13:08] Pool set diff to 2252
[2016-09-30 08:13:08] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-30 08:13:59] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-30 08:15:28] Stratum detected new block
[2016-09-30 08:15:39] Pool set diff to 1491
[2016-09-30 08:15:39] Stratum detected new block



looks like you haven't had any shares accepted so you don't see the speed.  I see that you started at a diff of 5000 and the miner keeps reducing the diff because it's too high.  Eventually it will adjust but you should start with a port with a lower diff as it seems you have a slow CPU for Monero.  There are pools that have lower starting diffs and http://mine.moneroworld.com/ has a slowly adjusting diff which is good for slow miners as the diff doesn't jump up which can cause time outs when the diff adjusts up too quickly.  If your CPU does not have AES-NI it will be slow.  Also note that you need 2MB of cache for each thread you run.  I have an i5 with 6MB cache and it works better with 2 of the 4 cores instead of 3 because the cache is shared.  I had an old pentium that was getting ~33 H/s and at that rate with present conditions it would take close to 5 months to mine 1 Monero :P

BTW when shares are accepted it will look like this:
[2016-09-30 09:58:44] accepted: 11482/11482 (100.00%), 90.50 H/s at diff 2643 (yay!!!)

You should also see something like this before shares are accepted:
[2016-09-30 10:00:33] thread 1: 2671 hashes, 43.15 H/s


Thanks for the response..  not too long after I took that shot I started getting stratum errors....  shut it down for now, will play with it tonight.

edit: btw.  I have a phenom 6 core on that rig.. should run pretty good.  thxs again.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: nioc on September 30, 2016, 03:54:25 PM

Thanks for the response..  not too long after I took that shot I started getting stratum errors....  shut it down for now, will play with it tonight.

edit: btw.  I have a phenom 6 core on that rig.. should run pretty good.  thxs again.

You can go to http://mine.moneroworld.com/#getting_started
and they have wolf's miner with a GUI that you can download.  "Monero Spelunker".  You just choose the # of threads you want and it defaults to the lowest diff port which you can change if you like.  Very easy.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: felicita on September 30, 2016, 09:56:28 PM
i sucessfully compiled this minerd and its mining !
https://github.com/lucasjones/cpuminer-multi

bt why i cant compile this miner do i need some more packeges ??


kidn regards


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: bruxo on October 06, 2016, 01:48:52 PM
Hi! I'm new to this world but I have one question. Why do I have almost half of the hashrate on your most recent version (07-09-14) than I have on the old one (05-30-2014)? I have a FX 8350 @ 4.6 GHz and on your old miner I was getting 200-250 H/s. Now I'm mining at 100-140 H/s. Is this normal?

Both running with the same startup programs:

minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://monerohash.com:3333 -u ADDRESS -p x

Can I still use your old one to mine?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: r3lentleSs on October 18, 2016, 07:06:04 PM
Ofcource u can still use the old one, i'm using it aswell.
Downloadlink latest release is broken btw


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: omnichanh on October 26, 2016, 06:49:42 AM
Hi all,
I have a question regarding mining XMR : Can I mining XMR with Pi3 and USB Miner ?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: nioc on October 26, 2016, 12:59:11 PM
Hi all,
I have a question regarding mining XMR : Can I mining XMR with Pi3 and USB Miner ?

I assume the USB miner was designed for btc.  It won't work because XMR uses a  different algorithm.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: cisA on October 26, 2016, 04:54:03 PM
Beware!

CPUminer is an Trojan!


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: nioc on October 26, 2016, 09:02:23 PM
Beware!

CPUminer is an Trojan!

Most antivirus programs will tag most CPU miner programs because they can be used by bot nets.   Of the thousands of people who have used this miner for over 2 years not one has reported an issue.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: cisA on October 30, 2016, 05:30:50 PM
Its the first Miner with Alert from ESET.

Private keys can be stored for long time ... Not Opensource and AV-Alert, dont suspect  ::)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: carlo_0000 on October 30, 2016, 06:57:55 PM
hello
i m using the miner  not sure with version i ahve i think it s this one
https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/minerd-wolf-07-09-14.exe

but there is a memory leak , miner start with around 10mb of memory but after 2-3 days it s more than 1 gigas


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: kntheory on November 15, 2016, 02:33:05 AM
I have a problem  with https[Suspicious link removed]

https://s15.postimg.org/iwk8hp6uj/error.png
https://s15.postimg.org/cwwhe1m23/error1.png
https://s15.postimg.org/hwtxlzror/error2.png

please help


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: almirfiorio on November 18, 2016, 01:02:53 AM
Dear Wolf and Friends

Now im usingh "CPUMiner-Multi by Wolf and Lucas Jones" in my Linux

Im using one pc with Linux debian with 24 cpu of 2.3 ghz.
But it is the only computer that is appearing 5 workers
And It is mining at a speed of 300 H/S. But I think it's not enough.

Which operating system do you recommend for downloading faster?

What currency are we currently able to mine faster using only CPU?
I'm mining mine (XMR) and collecting 0.05 per day.

Is there any way to mine on the same minergate account using  different pcs?


Thanks
Almir


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: cisA on November 20, 2016, 03:02:08 PM

Im using one pc with Linux debian with 24 cpu of 2.3 ghz.
But it is the only computer that is appearing 5 workers
And It is mining at a speed of 300 H/S. But I think it's not enough.
You have twentyfour CPU on one motherboard?

Quote
Which operating system do you recommend for downloading faster?
Iam not sure, but the last info was, that mining with this miner is on linux slower than win

Quote
What currency are we currently able to mine faster using only CPU?
I'm mining mine (XMR) and collecting 0.05 per day.
CPU mining is dead. Otherwise you are admin and bash the cpuminer on all PCs in your company

Quote
Is there any way to mine on the same minergate account using  different pcs?


You can get trouble, because they can detect/interpretive hijacked PCs. If the PCs mine from the same IP, than no problem.
If you will mine from many different IPs, than ask the support and give before mining all IPs.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: pes1374 on November 25, 2016, 09:30:27 AM
hi
the link download is lost.
i click on link say file not found
please someone upload file .
thaaaanks.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: pes1374 on November 25, 2016, 10:42:41 AM
nobody to help me? ???


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: pes1374 on November 25, 2016, 06:12:44 PM
this link (https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-05-30-2014.zip) is broken
i cant download file.
please someone upload file and share it .
pleassse


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: fedoros on December 03, 2016, 12:12:48 PM
Where to get Win32 and 64 +AES and -AES binaries of Wolf's miner ? Links in the first post are broken (((

BTW : What is the best miner today for CryptoNight CPU mining ?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Rabinovitch on December 05, 2016, 06:02:56 PM
this link (https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-05-30-2014.zip) is broken
i cant download file.
please someone upload file and share it .
pleassse

Here it is: https://yadi.sk/d/Yj7zkEsh32JRmy (https://yadi.sk/d/Yj7zkEsh32JRmy)

Non-AES win64 version: https://yadi.sk/d/jesyeEn032JSSV (https://yadi.sk/d/jesyeEn032JSSV)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: manotroll on December 06, 2016, 10:33:28 PM
links off line


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: delicopsch56 on December 07, 2016, 03:02:32 AM
I've been testing this miner on 3 of my Ubuntu 16.04 machines mining Monero for a week or so, I like it very much.  I am noting about a 2% hashrate improvement when I use ./configure CFLAGS="-O3 -march=native" as opposed to the Basic *nix build instructions posted on github.  I'm trying to dig into why that might be the case.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: zakuti on December 16, 2016, 11:23:05 AM
have anoyne Non-AES win64 source? for  windows compilance


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Andre100 on December 16, 2016, 06:45:21 PM
have anoyne Non-AES win64 source? for  windows compilance

yes if some one share source or link be nice.
Thx.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: MrJaekin on January 11, 2017, 02:00:51 PM
Where to get Win32 and 64 +AES and -AES binaries of Wolf's miner ? Links in the first post are broken (((

BTW : What is the best miner today for CryptoNight CPU mining ?

I too would love to know what the best CPU XMR miner is.. Wolf?  Claymore?  I've got a few machines I'd like to power up.  :)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: slim87 on January 11, 2017, 05:21:48 PM
from my expirance the best one ist claymore 3.5 beta for CPU Monero mining. Really stable hashrate comparing to wolfs cpu miner and better hashrats at all (around 5% more than with the wolfs cpu miner).
The only thing I'm missing there is the remote API stuff which one is included in the Claymore GPU Miner (which one I'm using as well for mining monero). But maybe this will come with the next update from the CPU miner (I do hope so :D)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: arusi on January 16, 2017, 02:48:27 PM
All the download links are broken!
Where can I download the Windows x64 binaries?
AES-NI and non-AES-NI (https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-09-2014.zip)
Thanks!


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Ferz666 on January 17, 2017, 05:55:24 AM

Link to the version of windows does not work (404), give the new link please


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: superlux on January 25, 2017, 12:38:17 AM
Trying to compile it with mingw32 - getting error:

Code:
configure.ac:133: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_MSG_ERROR

Thank you for any help...


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Newton90 on January 26, 2017, 04:23:05 PM

Link to the version of windows does not work (404), give the new link please

yeah,where can i download  miner?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: quanghuyphung on February 09, 2017, 10:37:42 AM
Hi all

I have this bug in centos 7 x64

[2017-02-10 00:17:24] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2017-02-10 00:17:24] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://xmr.pool.minergate.com:45560
[2017-02-10 00:17:24] 19 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
[2017-02-10 00:17:53] Stratum connection failed: Failed connect to xmr.pool.minergate.com:45560; Operation now in progress
[2017-02-10 00:17:53] ...retry after 10 seconds

When make cpuminer have some warning:

crypto/c_keccak.c:102:5: warning: implicit declaration of function
crypto/c_keccak.c:102:5: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function
crypto/c_keccak.c:111:5: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function

Please help me to fix


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: dwyer17 on February 09, 2017, 05:06:40 PM
[quote

yeah,where can i download  miner?
[/quote]

Try this link: https://github.com/tpruvot/cpuminer-multi/releases


NiceHash also has a CPU miner here: https://www.nicehash.com/?p=nhmintro


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: NoratoCZ on February 13, 2017, 11:47:55 AM
[quote

yeah,where can i download  miner?

Try this link: https://github.com/tpruvot/cpuminer-multi/releases


NiceHash also has a CPU miner here: https://www.nicehash.com/?p=nhmintro
[/quote]

Thank you for new links :)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: mastervt007 on February 26, 2017, 04:24:19 PM
hi, i wanna make the command start on boot, anyone know how to do it? im using ubuntu 16.04 vps  ??? ???


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: alirezakaj on March 01, 2017, 07:16:22 AM
the  links for  non dll  widnwos  build miner    is broken
pls some one have compiled version of this?
how to compile the source  for non dll   depence?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: kevinchan1 on March 09, 2017, 11:11:00 PM
Hi,

How do you get this to work on Nicehash for cryptonight? Does it even work?

Code in run file:

cpuminer-gw64-corei7 -a timetravel -o stratum+tcp://cryptonight.eu.nicehash.com:3355 -u 1jUhyi9BophBSWjjQDSzmnfru41WzezCa -p x


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: felicita on April 19, 2017, 06:38:38 PM
hi what iam doing wrong ?

Code:
pi@raspberrypi:~/cpuminer-multi $ ./autogen.sh
configure.ac:16: installing './compile'
configure.ac:4: installing './config.guess'
configure.ac:4: installing './config.sub'
configure.ac:6: installing './install-sh'
configure.ac:6: installing './missing'
Makefile.am: installing './depcomp'
pi@raspberrypi:~/cpuminer-multi $
pi@raspberrypi:~/cpuminer-multi $
pi@raspberrypi:~/cpuminer-multi $ CFLAGS="-march=native" ./configure --disable-aes-ni
checking build system type... armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
checking host system type... armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
checking target system type... armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p
checking for gawk... no
checking for mawk... mawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether make supports nested variables... yes
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler works... *** Error in `gcc': double free or corruption (top): 0x0015b550 ***
no
configure: error: in `/home/pi/cpuminer-multi':
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details


the normal cpuminer was possible to compile but i want to test x11 mining so why i cant compile this one ?


kind regards


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: delicopsch56 on April 22, 2017, 08:39:45 AM
hi, i wanna make the command start on boot, anyone know how to do it? im using ubuntu 16.04 vps  ??? ???

Study up on /etc/rc.local if that is an available option on your VPS.  Might take a few tries to get your commands and options right for your config, but that's the ticket.  Make sure your machine has L3 cache of a decent amount.  Use a pool regardless, will help you no matter your goal, accumulate or sell periodically.  Especial XMR in my experience, XMR is a helluva intensive algorithm.

If you have 2 meg L3 cache or less allocated you may as well piss in the wind if you don't have a dedicated machine leased. or make a serious monthly financial investment in a badass VPS where your cache and crypto functions built into the processor.  Each XMR thread needs 2 MB by design for max efficiency.  Anything less is a joke.

That said, even if you have low L3 cache (2MB or greater it can be a bit of fun if you enjoy computer slaves.  Never know what the future holds.  




Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Flunder707 on May 08, 2017, 04:36:12 AM
Am I the only one disturbed by the wallpaper? lol


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: kattycris on May 09, 2017, 01:50:25 AM
hello,

Does anyone know what port the cpumulti uses on the pc? I am configuring iptables protection because the site does not have any DDOS protection and I need the port to free the traffic in it


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: delicopsch56 on May 09, 2017, 02:46:34 AM
hello,

Does anyone know what port the cpumulti uses on the pc? I am configuring iptables protection because the site does not have any DDOS protection and I need the port to free the traffic in it

It uses the port you tell it to. -o OR -x options are relevant depending on your proxy situation or not.  You have to use ports specified by the mining server as available for use, they often vary greatly depending on the pool.

minerd --help
Usage: minerd [OPTIONS]
Options:
  -a, --algo=ALGO       specify the algorithm to use
                          scrypt    scrypt(1024, 1, 1) (default)
                          sha256d   SHA-256d
                          X11       Xcoin
  -o, --url=URL         URL of mining server (default: http://127.0.0.1:9332/)
  -O, --userpass=U:P    username:password pair for mining server
  -u, --user=USERNAME   username for mining server
  -p, --pass=PASSWORD   password for mining server
      --cert=FILE       certificate for mining server using SSL
  -x, --proxy=[PROTOCOL://]HOST[:PORT]  connect through a proxy
  -t, --threads=N       number of miner threads (default: number of processors)
  -r, --retries=N       number of times to retry if a network call fails
                          (default: retry indefinitely)
  -R, --retry-pause=N   time to pause between retries, in seconds (default: 30)
  -T, --timeout=N       network timeout, in seconds (default: 270)
  -s, --scantime=N      upper bound on time spent scanning current work when
                          long polling is unavailable, in seconds (default: 5)
      --no-longpoll     disable X-Long-Polling support
      --no-stratum      disable X-Stratum support
  -q, --quiet           disable per-thread hashmeter output
  -D, --debug           enable debug output
  -H, --hashdebug       enable hash debug output
  -P, --protocol-dump   verbose dump of protocol-level activities
  -S, --syslog          use system log for output messages
  -B, --background      run the miner in the background
      --benchmark       run in offline benchmark mode
  -c, --config=FILE     load a JSON-format configuration file
  -V, --version         display version information and exit
  -h, --help            display this help text and exit



Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: kattycris on May 09, 2017, 11:10:37 AM
hello,

Does anyone know what port the cpumulti uses on the pc? I am configuring iptables protection because the site does not have any DDOS protection and I need the port to free the traffic in it

It uses the port you tell it to. -o OR -x options are relevant depending on your proxy situation or not.  You have to use ports specified by the mining server as available for use, they often vary greatly depending on the pool.

minerd --help
Usage: minerd [OPTIONS]
Options:
  -a, --algo=ALGO       specify the algorithm to use
                          scrypt    scrypt(1024, 1, 1) (default)
                          sha256d   SHA-256d
                          X11       Xcoin
  -o, --url=URL         URL of mining server (default: http://127.0.0.1:9332/)
  -O, --userpass=U:P    username:password pair for mining server
  -u, --user=USERNAME   username for mining server
  -p, --pass=PASSWORD   password for mining server
      --cert=FILE       certificate for mining server using SSL
  -x, --proxy=[PROTOCOL://]HOST[:PORT]  connect through a proxy
  -t, --threads=N       number of miner threads (default: number of processors)
  -r, --retries=N       number of times to retry if a network call fails
                          (default: retry indefinitely)
  -R, --retry-pause=N   time to pause between retries, in seconds (default: 30)
  -T, --timeout=N       network timeout, in seconds (default: 270)
  -s, --scantime=N      upper bound on time spent scanning current work when
                          long polling is unavailable, in seconds (default: 5)
      --no-longpoll     disable X-Long-Polling support
      --no-stratum      disable X-Stratum support
  -q, --quiet           disable per-thread hashmeter output
  -D, --debug           enable debug output
  -H, --hashdebug       enable hash debug output
  -P, --protocol-dump   verbose dump of protocol-level activities
  -S, --syslog          use system log for output messages
  -B, --background      run the miner in the background
      --benchmark       run in offline benchmark mode
  -c, --config=FILE     load a JSON-format configuration file
  -V, --version         display version information and exit
  -h, --help            display this help text and exit




hello. Thank you for your answer.
Do you say the ip address of the pool they give to mine? The one I use has several I've put and it did not work.
After making the rules in iptable my friend did in a way that blocks everything there, I have to know which port on the computer the miner will use to send the data. I already looked at this help and nothing. I tried looking at the cpumulti files and nothing. It has some versions of it that brings that information but already that wolf does not bring.
I need to release the port on iptable that gives free packet traffic. If not, do not connect to the pool.

I'm not using proxy....

The site where I am testing the vps has no protection ddos and with this I get attacked by botnet and then the cloud thinks that it is me that is doing attack and stops my machines. This way I do not make money LOL ....



Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: delicopsch56 on May 09, 2017, 05:50:51 PM
hello,

Does anyone know what port the cpumulti uses on the pc? I am configuring iptables protection because the site does not have any DDOS protection and I need the port to free the traffic in it

It uses the port you tell it to. -o OR -x options are relevant depending on your proxy situation or not.  You have to use ports specified by the mining server as available for use, they often vary greatly depending on the pool.

minerd --help
Usage: minerd [OPTIONS]
Options:
  -a, --algo=ALGO       specify the algorithm to use
                          scrypt    scrypt(1024, 1, 1) (default)
                          sha256d   SHA-256d
                          X11       Xcoin
  -o, --url=URL         URL of mining server (default: http://127.0.0.1:9332/)
  -O, --userpass=U:P    username:password pair for mining server
  -u, --user=USERNAME   username for mining server
  -p, --pass=PASSWORD   password for mining server
      --cert=FILE       certificate for mining server using SSL
  -x, --proxy=[PROTOCOL://]HOST[:PORT]  connect through a proxy
  -t, --threads=N       number of miner threads (default: number of processors)
  -r, --retries=N       number of times to retry if a network call fails
                          (default: retry indefinitely)
  -R, --retry-pause=N   time to pause between retries, in seconds (default: 30)
  -T, --timeout=N       network timeout, in seconds (default: 270)
  -s, --scantime=N      upper bound on time spent scanning current work when
                          long polling is unavailable, in seconds (default: 5)
      --no-longpoll     disable X-Long-Polling support
      --no-stratum      disable X-Stratum support
  -q, --quiet           disable per-thread hashmeter output
  -D, --debug           enable debug output
  -H, --hashdebug       enable hash debug output
  -P, --protocol-dump   verbose dump of protocol-level activities
  -S, --syslog          use system log for output messages
  -B, --background      run the miner in the background
      --benchmark       run in offline benchmark mode
  -c, --config=FILE     load a JSON-format configuration file
  -V, --version         display version information and exit
  -h, --help            display this help text and exit




hello. Thank you for your answer.
Do you say the ip address of the pool they give to mine? The one I use has several I've put and it did not work.
After making the rules in iptable my friend did in a way that blocks everything there, I have to know which port on the computer the miner will use to send the data. I already looked at this help and nothing. I tried looking at the cpumulti files and nothing. It has some versions of it that brings that information but already that wolf does not bring.
I need to release the port on iptable that gives free packet traffic. If not, do not connect to the pool.

I'm not using proxy....

The site where I am testing the vps has no protection ddos and with this I get attacked by botnet and then the cloud thinks that it is me that is doing attack and stops my machines. This way I do not make money LOL ....



Iptables has a couple counterintuitive concepts that aren't flat apparent, reminds me of a crazy commission determination engine I worked on once.  I can't give you a better answer than that because I'm not highly knowledgeable about it myself and my unix machines are all fine now and it's been awhile since I had an iptables problem.  I **think** I solved my last issue by an answer at stackexchange.

You can keep digging at iptables via that suggestion and you may find your answer, but DDOS attack and protection is very hard even for the folks that are experts in that or can throw lots of money to those folks to help.  Honestly I'd start with switching VPS to one that provides DDOS as part of the package if I couldn't solve in a couple days.  Sometimes throwing money at it *IS* the best way to solve a problem.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: kattycris on May 09, 2017, 06:02:59 PM

Iptables has a couple counterintuitive concepts that aren't flat apparent, reminds me of a crazy commission determination engine I worked on once.  I can't give you a better answer than that because I'm not highly knowledgeable about it myself and my unix machines are all fine now and it's been awhile since I had an iptables problem.  I **think** I solved my last issue by an answer at stackexchange.

You can keep digging at iptables via that suggestion and you may find your answer, but DDOS attack and protection is very hard even for the folks that are experts in that or can throw lots of money to those folks to help.  Honestly I'd start with switching VPS to one that provides DDOS as part of the package if I couldn't solve in a couple days.  Sometimes throwing money at it *IS* the best way to solve a problem.


I have a friend that manages linux but he does not know anything about mining and he tells me that he needs to know the port that the program uses input and output data so he can free the traffic in it ... I am gathering the maximum information Possible and passing to him and then see what you can try. The site that I'm using is easier and spends little to account for ... the others that have protection are more expensive and at the moment I'm in the test base trying to find a place to replace the amazon because the accounts do not last Nor 4 hours more or does not release limits. It just does not work anymore.

I try in stackwebsite ..... but if anyone else has an idea ....

*sorry fot my bad english. i use google translate to help me :D


Title: On Raspberry Pi 3
Post by: Zenitur on May 09, 2017, 07:03:35 PM
On Raspberry Pi 3

Code:
$ CFLAGS="-O3 -mfpu=neon" ./configure --disable-aes-ni
$ make
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -pthread -I./compat/jansson   -falign-loops=16 -falign-functions=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-labels=16 -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing   -O3 -mfpu=neon -MT minerd-cryptonight_lobotomized.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/minerd-cryptonight_lobotomized.Tpo -c -o minerd-cryptonight_lobotomized.o `test -f 'cryptonight_lobotomized.c' || echo './'`cryptonight_lobotomized.c
In file included from cryptonight.h:6:0,
                 from cryptonight_lobotomized.c:1:
miner.h:188:58: warning: ‘struct cryptonight_ctx’ declared inside parameter list
   uint32_t max_nonce, unsigned long *hashes_done, struct cryptonight_ctx *persistentctx);
                                                          ^
miner.h:188:58: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
cryptonight_lobotomized.c:2:23: fatal error: x86intrin.h: No such file or directory
 #include <x86intrin.h>
                       ^
compilation terminated.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: delicopsch56 on May 10, 2017, 10:06:13 AM

Iptables has a couple counterintuitive concepts that aren't flat apparent, reminds me of a crazy commission determination engine I worked on once.  I can't give you a better answer than that because I'm not highly knowledgeable about it myself and my unix machines are all fine now and it's been awhile since I had an iptables problem.  I **think** I solved my last issue by an answer at stackexchange.

You can keep digging at iptables via that suggestion and you may find your answer, but DDOS attack and protection is very hard even for the folks that are experts in that or can throw lots of money to those folks to help.  Honestly I'd start with switching VPS to one that provides DDOS as part of the package if I couldn't solve in a couple days.  Sometimes throwing money at it *IS* the best way to solve a problem.


I have a friend that manages linux but he does not know anything about mining and he tells me that he needs to know the port that the program uses input and output data so he can free the traffic in it ... I am gathering the maximum information Possible and passing to him and then see what you can try. The site that I'm using is easier and spends little to account for ... the others that have protection are more expensive and at the moment I'm in the test base trying to find a place to replace the amazon because the accounts do not last Nor 4 hours more or does not release limits. It just does not work anymore.

I try in stackwebsite ..... but if anyone else has an idea ....

*sorry fot my bad english. i use google translate to help me :D

That's fine.  I'm understanding you ok.   If you really trust your friend and you believe he can solve, and there isn't a lot of risk, add him as admin temporarily and let him have a look.  You can change passwords, 2FA, etc after. 

Another alternative is to test small scale at another location you OWN, testbed, maybe at home, behind any decent recent router that can drop DOS attacks.  Change a bunch of stuff, different mining account, wallet, etc, for that and then you will possibly have more time for you and\or him to try to poke and prod at something that stays running without getting shut down real fast.

Baby steps.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: kattycris on May 10, 2017, 10:19:09 AM

Iptables has a couple counterintuitive concepts that aren't flat apparent, reminds me of a crazy commission determination engine I worked on once.  I can't give you a better answer than that because I'm not highly knowledgeable about it myself and my unix machines are all fine now and it's been awhile since I had an iptables problem.  I **think** I solved my last issue by an answer at stackexchange.

You can keep digging at iptables via that suggestion and you may find your answer, but DDOS attack and protection is very hard even for the folks that are experts in that or can throw lots of money to those folks to help.  Honestly I'd start with switching VPS to one that provides DDOS as part of the package if I couldn't solve in a couple days.  Sometimes throwing money at it *IS* the best way to solve a problem.


I have a friend that manages linux but he does not know anything about mining and he tells me that he needs to know the port that the program uses input and output data so he can free the traffic in it ... I am gathering the maximum information Possible and passing to him and then see what you can try. The site that I'm using is easier and spends little to account for ... the others that have protection are more expensive and at the moment I'm in the test base trying to find a place to replace the amazon because the accounts do not last Nor 4 hours more or does not release limits. It just does not work anymore.

I try in stackwebsite ..... but if anyone else has an idea ....

*sorry fot my bad english. i use google translate to help me :D

That's fine.  I'm understanding you ok.   If you really trust your friend and you believe he can solve, and there isn't a lot of risk, add him as admin temporarily and let him have a look.  You can change passwords, 2FA, etc after. 

Another alternative is to test small scale at another location you OWN, testbed, maybe at home, behind any decent recent router that can drop DOS attacks.  Change a bunch of stuff, different mining account, wallet, etc, for that and then you will possibly have more time for you and\or him to try to poke and prod at something that stays running without getting shut down real fast.

Baby steps.

i change the miner, I have other vps that take a week to give these warnings of attack in the network in the pool, but now I'm stopping everything if not I'm going to lose those accounts that I already have despite being tests ...
I have another friend who is using the same cloud and is not having these problems because she is using it in two pools.

Is it possible someone without knowing what miner I am using send attack to pool trying to attack me having the address and id? I made an account in git to make it easier to use xmr stack, but I changed it to cpumulti, but I'm going to take everything out of git ... I do not doubt anything that has someone bailing me ....

The other pool that I could test to see if it does not generate an attack is the minergate but that is horrible, or they rob in the hash or do not let you make a withdrawal .... I find another pool that gives the same yield and makes automatic withdrawal with I do not care that way

I only have to find out how to free iptable cpumulti


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: delicopsch56 on May 10, 2017, 10:11:27 PM
At this point if my suggestions can't work for you my last is to start an iptables question thread in a more appropriate venue\forum.  This thread doesn't see much traffic anymore is my guess, and if you KNOW you have an iptables problem then you are way off topic anyway because your issue is really not specifically about the miner software.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: SateRebus on May 21, 2017, 06:02:02 PM
Dowload link at 1st page not work

anyone still have link for Non AES-NI miner ?

thanks


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: delicopsch56 on May 21, 2017, 07:40:38 PM
Dowload link at 1st page not work

anyone still have link for Non AES-NI miner ?

thanks

Nope.  I wouldn't waste your time or electricity, probably take ya an eon to get a whole coin.  I have a HP Z600 Workstation 2X Xeon E5640 Quad Core 2.67GHz/16GB/500Gb/V3800 with 20 ml of L3 cache that only hashes monero at .6 KH/s.  I was just trading electricity for XMR for quite a while on speculation, it might be slightly profitable now that monero is at about $33 USD, but mostly I'm just speculating still.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: ox_20 on May 24, 2017, 04:35:45 PM
Hello everyone.

Recently I received a dozen of IBM servers with Xeon CPU's. And I have free(!) electricity with no limits.

Is here someone who still has Wolf's miner binaries for windows?

Please share!

Unfortunately, all links from 1st page are dead.

I'm looking for:

Windows x64 binaries! AES-NI only
cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-09-2014.zip

06/12/2014
Windows binary for non-AES-NI
cpuminer-multi-wolf-06-12-2014.zip

Windows x64 binary for non-AES-NI
minerd-wolf-07-09-14.exe

Many many many thanks in advance!


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: SateRebus on May 25, 2017, 01:31:38 PM
Dowload link at 1st page not work

anyone still have link for Non AES-NI miner ?

thanks

Nope.  I wouldn't waste your time or electricity, probably take ya an eon to get a whole coin.  I have a HP Z600 Workstation 2X Xeon E5640 Quad Core 2.67GHz/16GB/500Gb/V3800 with 20 ml of L3 cache that only hashes monero at .6 KH/s.  I was just trading electricity for XMR for quite a while on speculation, it might be slightly profitable now that monero is at about $33 USD, but mostly I'm just speculating still.

do you have a miner link ?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: tfeagle on June 12, 2017, 08:07:45 PM
Hello!!  I have also been looking for Wolf's 2014 CPU miner.  I have not seen a link posted here.  Did anyone get a link from private message?  Could you share with me?  Thanks!! 


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Mattthev on June 12, 2017, 08:15:21 PM
Hello!!  I have also been looking for Wolf's 2014 CPU miner.  I have not seen a link posted here.  Did anyone get a link from private message?  Could you share with me?  Thanks!! 
XMR-STAK-CPU it's port of Wolf's miner with optimizations.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: variantolog on June 20, 2017, 10:38:44 PM
Dowload link at 1st page not work
anyone still have link for Non AES-NI miner ?
thanks

Welcome:  https://yadi.sk/d/QMEng-Lw3KK395 (https://yadi.sk/d/QMEng-Lw3KK395),  password:  bitcointalk.org


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: brackhap on June 21, 2017, 04:08:13 AM
Is there any version of this miner for linux?

Regards


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Mattthev on June 21, 2017, 07:00:48 AM
https://github.com/OhGodAPet/wolf-xmr-miner/releases


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: cisA on June 24, 2017, 08:43:07 PM
Take care:

https://news.drweb.com/show/?i=11326&amp;c=5&amp;lng=en&amp;p=0


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: normalboy on June 24, 2017, 09:53:22 PM
im using VPS ubuntu 16.04 anh use Putty to conect VPS.
now im using this code for mining xmr
sudo apt-get update && wget https://minergate.com/download/deb-cli -O minergate-cli.deb && sudo dpkg -i minergate-cli.deb
minergate-cli -user myemail -xmr

Everyone can help me edit for mining xmr and fnc, i wanna both. THanks


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Almeida on July 17, 2017, 04:25:46 AM
Hello, complete noob here.

I tried to test mining some monero, so I downloaded wolf-xmr-miner-v0.4 (processor with AES-NI). When I try to run from cmd, with compatibility mode, I get the following error message (windows 8 ):

The procedure entry point clCreateCommandQueueWithProperties could not be located in the dynamic link library

Any ideas?

I created an offline wallet I plan to input in the miner, so I don't really want to install the whole cli wallet. But I noticed the cli wallet has an option to mine also. How is the cli wallet miner algorithm in comparison with this one?

cheers


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: yerfei on July 17, 2017, 06:26:39 AM
Hello, complete noob here.

I tried to test mining some monero, so I downloaded wolf-xmr-miner-v0.4 (processor with AES-NI). When I try to run from cmd, with compatibility mode, I get the following error message (windows 8 ):

The procedure entry point clCreateCommandQueueWithProperties could not be located in the dynamic link library

Any ideas?

I created an offline wallet I plan to input in the miner, so I don't really want to install the whole cli wallet. But I noticed the cli wallet has an option to mine also. How is the cli wallet miner algorithm in comparison with this one?

cheers

If you want to mine Monero or similar  Algo you can try Winminer
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2004875.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2004875.0)


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: RobDust on July 25, 2017, 09:28:00 AM
on one miner it opens the dos box, and then

access denied

why?


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Almeida on July 26, 2017, 11:46:43 AM
on one miner it opens the dos box, and then

access denied

why?

I did the noob thing to try to run the .exe, maybe you did the same. What you need really is to call the exe with the cmd (in case you use windows), and you need to imput the commands there. BUT, it is easier if you create a .bat file so you can click on it and run what you want. I'll leave an example here for you so you can test:

1. go to the folder where wolf miner is;
2. create a simple txt file (no doc, rtf, plain txt);
3. open the txt file and write:

[the path of the minerd.exe file in your computer, like C:/xxxx]/minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://mine.moneropool.com:3333 -p x -u 45quMfKHHRXCaTKTkiiLaSPwpqL3JAXMP863f6miz3ny6mrM62VjV6a5jnxKMAG4dCEopSwVJQGkvab A9ctVjYRVHFHaYvx -t [type here the number of threads you want, if your cpu is x cores you might try x threads]

NOTE: I put my address, change to yours, change the mining pool if you want another pool. Don't type the number of threads between [], only the number, like 4. I think it runs without the path, but with the path you can move the bat to other places and still execute it.

4. save the txt file and change its extension from .txt to .bat;

5. double click the .bat file and start to mine.



Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: justuser on August 19, 2017, 12:14:18 PM
Hello
I have 3.10.0-427.36.1.lve1.4.44 linux version
I try to install daemon
git clone https://github.com/wolf9466/cpuminer-multi - ok
But ./autogen.sh - there are some problems


Makefile.am: installing './depcomp'
configure.ac:133: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_MSG_ERROR
      If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
      See the Autoconf documentation.

How to fix it?

If I run configure,

./configure: line 5668: syntax error near unexpected token `,'
./configure: line 5668: `LIBCURL_CHECK_CONFIG(, 7.15.2, ,'




Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: amadir on August 26, 2017, 11:07:34 AM
I am mining Monero at approx 520 H/sec with my DELL PowerEdge R620. Shouldnt it run faster? Mining with -t 16

Regards
Amadir


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: Mattthev on August 26, 2017, 12:03:22 PM
I am mining Monero at approx 520 H/sec with my DELL PowerEdge R620. Shouldnt it run faster? Mining with -t 16

Regards
Amadir
Use XMR-STAK-CPU
https://github.com/fireice-uk/xmr-stak-cpu/releases


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: rgboyko on August 31, 2017, 06:11:20 AM
I am mining Monero at approx 520 H/sec with my DELL PowerEdge R620. Shouldnt it run faster? Mining with -t 16

Regards
Amadir
Use XMR-STAK-CPU
https://github.com/fireice-uk/xmr-stak-cpu/releases

how did you make it? I can't get through please help.


Title: Re: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014
Post by: lpxcc on September 21, 2017, 03:55:15 AM
Is the cpu miner running on a windows VM? Also on Virtualized Windows Server 2008?