Bitcoin Forum

Bitcoin => Bitcoin Discussion => Topic started by: mcorlett on February 23, 2012, 04:11:40 AM



Title: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: mcorlett on February 23, 2012, 04:11:40 AM
Naomi O’Leary (http://www.naomioleary.com/), an Irish British (sorry!) journalist writing for Reuters, is doing a piece on Bitcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=57219.msg763086#msg763086), and is looking for some input from us, the community, on how we use bitcoins, and how we initially discovered them.

Let's all take a couple of minutes out of our day to chip in with a response, and make sure we get an accurate portrayal of Bitcoin and our wonderful community this time. "Hacker currency" no more!

PM Naomi. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=pm;sa=send;u=52424)


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on February 23, 2012, 05:43:09 AM
Naomi O’Leary (http://www.naomioleary.com/), a British journalist writing for Reuters, is doing a piece on Bitcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=57219.msg763086#msg763086), and is looking for some input from us, the community, on how we use bitcoins, and how we initially discovered them.

Let's all take a couple of minutes out of our day to chip in with a response, and make sure we get an accurate portrayal of Bitcoin and our wonderful community this time. "Hacker currency" no more!

PM Naomi. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=pm;sa=send;u=52424)

We will soon see if this is the same Naomi that works at Reuters, for I PM'ed her letting her know that I Tweeted her and requested a DM from her via Twitter, thus proving that she's the same Naomi. The last thing we would want is to have a rogue reporter, or somebody claiming to be such, amassing information from users, then possibly a user getting to comfortable with that individual and start offering up a mess of personal and unrelated information to their advantage. I offer no apologies for being skeptical, and for what, and how, I've approached this is not detrimental by any stretch of the imagination.

~Bruno~ (not Jacqueline Theresa Bruno)


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: BadBear on February 23, 2012, 12:58:18 PM
Off topic split here
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=65876.0

Let's keep it on track folks, don't want her to have to read 2 pages to find one real/relevant post  ;)


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: mcorlett on February 23, 2012, 02:03:38 PM
We have confirmation. (http://twitter.com/#!/NaomiOhReally/status/172579965559255041)


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: Technomage on February 23, 2012, 02:37:13 PM
I sent her my story. I hope it helps. :)


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on February 23, 2012, 05:44:31 PM
We have confirmation. (http://twitter.com/#!/NaomiOhReally/status/172579965559255041)

First it was the joint, now you, mcorlett, stealing my thunder.  ;D I hereby confirm this confirmation.

Hi Bruno,
 
Don't worry, I'm happy to follow you! It's the same Naomi, I replied to you on Twitter about an hour ago.

Do you have any tips for me on who would be good to talk to on this piece?

Thanks,

Naomi

I'll reply in kind, then post what I've penned on this thread.

If memory serves me, I believe that at least two threads exists consisting of how users first discovered Bitcoin. Would somebody be so kind as to hunt, then link them here while I pen my reply? I'm sure some gems could be gleaned from within.

Thanks in advance,

~Bruno~


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on February 23, 2012, 06:52:47 PM
As promised, my PM reply to Naomi O'Leary with Reuters:

Hi Bruno,
 
Don't worry, I'm happy to follow you! It's the same Naomi, I replied to you on Twitter about an hour ago.

Do you have any tips for me on who would be good to talk to on this piece?

Thanks,

Naomi

Naomi

It's kind of you to consider writing an article that'll introduce Bitcoin to your fine readers of Reuters, a publication I truly enjoy reading, albeit only the easy-to-load online version.

To take into consideration your valuable time, a dedicated thread started by mcorlett (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=48076), found here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=65827.0), could act as your one-stop-source for your copy. As the thread becomes populated, I'm sure you'll even be able to glean nuggets from it.

As far as your request from me is concerned, I offer up two names: Tony Gallippi and Roger Ver, of Bit-pay Merchant Solutions (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=31293) and MemoryDealers (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=10310), respectively.

Granted, it may not be Bitcoin related or accepting type business entities you seek but, if you drop them a quick line, I'm sure they'll provide you adequate fodder. At the very least, compare the list of names they provide with those of users who have gracefully sent you their stories, and I'm sure you'll be golden.

Sincerely,

Bruno



Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: the joint on February 23, 2012, 06:55:08 PM

First it was the joint, now you, mcorlett, stealing my thunder.  ;D I hereby confirm this confirmation.


I retract my thunder.


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: BitPay Business Solutions on February 23, 2012, 07:25:11 PM
I am traveling and limited to iPhone fr another day. Will send a thorough reply when I get to a computer

Tony


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: Isepick on February 23, 2012, 08:13:05 PM
Zhoutong might be an interesting candidate for her to talk to. The sociopolitical implications of him opening up Bitcoins to the Chinese are staggering...and he's just a kid in Singapore. Although it may be wiser to hold up on the speculation side of things for a bit. Still, he is a pretty good success story, even if you disagree with the effects his service has on the market.


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on February 23, 2012, 08:34:21 PM
Zhoutong might be an interesting candidate for her to talk to. The sociopolitical implications of him opening up Bitcoins to the Chinese are staggering...and he's just a kid in Singapore. Although it may be wiser to hold up on the speculation side of things for a bit. Still, he is a pretty good success story, even if you disagree with the effects his service has on the market.

Interesting thought. I wish Chicago Cabbie was fully on board, for I know as a fact his story would make interesting copy.


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: bitstarter on February 23, 2012, 11:44:43 PM
You might want to mention this story about how bitcoin saved someone from a "crippling injury" :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=64287.0


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: kiba on February 23, 2012, 11:55:40 PM
You might want to mention this story about how bitcoin saved someone from a "crippling injury" :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=64287.0

Well, it's more like bitcoin help facilitate an exchange.


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on February 24, 2012, 02:13:23 AM
Naomi, if the admins haven't done it already upon reading this post, you can formally request to be whitelisted, thereby enabling you to fully interact with the rest of the forum, opposed to being limited as a Newbie.

~Bruno~


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on February 24, 2012, 07:58:44 PM
Update:

Naomi has been whitelisted, thereby allowing her free reign of the forum.

And of special interests to fellow Bitcoiners living in the UK, the following is an except from a PM she sent me:

Quote
I've been reading online about how Bitcoin works and I have downloaded the program. I think the best way to truly understand how it works would be for someone to show me how they use it. I'd be really interested in meeting some Bitcoin users/miners in London, who are happy to introduce me to the system.

I suggest that everybody keeps filling her request, for you'll never know what story(s) she'll grad for her copy.

~Bruno~


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: Koekiemonster on February 24, 2012, 11:58:49 PM
You might want to mention this story about how bitcoin saved someone from a "crippling injury" :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=64287.0

I don't see how that has anything to do with bitcoin itself, fun story nevertheless.

I suggest she speaks to Erik Voorhees (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=12149) as well since I've been impressed by his stories and posts. He always is spot-on and explains everything as clear as you'd like it to be. I'm pm'ing her now.


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on February 25, 2012, 02:41:59 AM
You might want to mention this story about how bitcoin saved someone from a "crippling injury" :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=64287.0

I don't see how that has anything to do with bitcoin itself, fun story nevertheless.

I suggest she speaks to Erik Voorhees (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=12149) as well since I've been impressed by his stories and posts. He always is spot-on and explains everything as clear as you'd like it to be. I'm pm'ing her now.

This:

Hello,

I'm a journalist for Reuters, and I'm writing an article about Bitcoins. I plan it to be an introductory piece, explaining to a broad audience what Bitcoins are, how they work, and why they are exciting.

I'm interested in talking to people who use Bitcoins who can explain how they are useful and how they got interested in using them.

I'd love to hear from you - send me a PM if you're interested in helping me out!

Naomi


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: the joint on February 25, 2012, 03:10:00 AM
You might want to mention this story about how bitcoin saved someone from a "crippling injury" :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=64287.0

I don't see how that has anything to do with bitcoin itself, fun story nevertheless.

I suggest she speaks to Erik Voorhees (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=12149) as well since I've been impressed by his stories and posts. He always is spot-on and explains everything as clear as you'd like it to be. I'm pm'ing her now.

This:

Hello,

I'm a journalist for Reuters, and I'm writing an article about Bitcoins. I plan it to be an introductory piece, explaining to a broad audience what Bitcoins are, how they work, and why they are exciting.

I'm interested in talking to people who use Bitcoins who can explain how they are useful and how they got interested in using them.

I'd love to hear from you - send me a PM if you're interested in helping me out!

Naomi


  :o  Do the doctor one, do the doctor one!


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: bitprotection on February 25, 2012, 11:20:47 PM
You might want to mention this story about how bitcoin saved someone from a "crippling injury" :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=64287.0

I don't see how that has anything to do with bitcoin itself, fun story nevertheless.

I suggest she speaks to Erik Voorhees (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=12149) as well since I've been impressed by his stories and posts. He always is spot-on and explains everything as clear as you'd like it to be. I'm pm'ing her now.

This:

Hello,

I'm a journalist for Reuters, and I'm writing an article about Bitcoins. I plan it to be an introductory piece, explaining to a broad audience what Bitcoins are, how they work, and why they are exciting.

I'm interested in talking to people who use Bitcoins who can explain how they are useful and how they got interested in using them.

I'd love to hear from you - send me a PM if you're interested in helping me out!

Naomi


  :o  Do the doctor one, do the doctor one!

+ 1 Dr. Dr.!


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: naomioleary on February 27, 2012, 11:36:53 AM
Hello everyone.

Thanks so much for setting up this forum for me. Bitcoiners have proved so helpful and welcoming! Thanks to all.

I've received a lot of responses from everywhere from Washington to Israel to China. I'm currently looking to meet up with people who use Bitcoin in or near London, so I can see for myself how it works. I'm especially keen on meeting anyone who actually has a mining operation - I've been hearing about dry ice and various kinds of modifications, it all sounds fascinating, I'd love to see one for real.

Are there any ex-forex traders out there? These characters keep getting mentioned, but I have yet to hear from any.

ps. mcorlett - I'm actually not British, I'm from the Republic of Ireland, but that's not important.

Naomi


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: naomioleary on February 27, 2012, 11:56:01 AM
Ah, yes, also -

It seems to me that two things have to happen for Bitcoin to become more widely used.

1. A programme needs to be available to allow people to buy and safely hold Bitcoins that is easy to use and not time consuming.

2. Bitcoin would need to be priced and tradeable on a major exchange that people trust to provide neutral pricing data and protect their transactions.

One guy I spoke to set up an exchange, but had to close it down because US financial services regulations made it impossible for him to develop it into a legitimate business. Is regulation the major obstacle for Bitcoin becoming more widely used? Does anyone have any idea what specific regulations are the problem?

Naomi


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: Meni Rosenfeld on February 27, 2012, 01:08:46 PM
I'm currently looking to meet up with people who use Bitcoin in or near London, so I can see for myself how it works. I'm especially keen on meeting anyone who actually has a mining operation - I've been hearing about dry ice and various kinds of modifications, it all sounds fascinating, I'd love to see one for real.
You should consider contacting Amir Taaki (aka genjix (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1931)) who lives in London and, among other things, is a core Bitcoin developer and operates an exchange; and Vladimir Marchenko (http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=35285840&authType=NAME_SEARCH&authToken=2cp_&locale=en_US&srchid=bc625927-3c52-4040-a18e-6c61fae9f300-0&srchindex=1&srchtotal=12&goback=.fps_PBCK_*1_Vladimir_Marchenko_*1_*1_*1_*1_*2_*1_Y_*1_*1_*1_false_1_R_*1_*51_*1_*51_true_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2&pvs=ps&trk=pp_profile_name_link), who lives in Sheffield and last I heard, owned a large contract-mining farm.

1. A programme needs to be available to allow people to buy and safely hold Bitcoins that is easy to use and not time consuming.

2. Bitcoin would need to be priced and tradeable on a major exchange that people trust to provide neutral pricing data and protect their transactions.
There's a lot to be desired in these two areas but I think the current options are good enough, I don't think that's what is holding Bitcoin back.

One guy I spoke to set up an exchange, but had to close it down because US financial services regulations made it impossible for him to develop it into a legitimate business. Is regulation the major obstacle for Bitcoin becoming more widely used? Does anyone have any idea what specific regulations are the problem?
The biggest problem is AML (anti money laundering) laws which attempt to put a handle on activities that could be an opening for money laundering. At best, the licensing and reporting required to comply with such laws has costs involved and hassles customers. I don't know what specific problems Tradehill have been having.


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: mcorlett on February 27, 2012, 01:11:34 PM
ps. mcorlett - I'm actually not British, I'm from the Republic of Ireland, but that's not important.
I apologize profusely. The mistake has been corrected in the original post.


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: wareen on February 27, 2012, 01:21:37 PM
One guy I spoke to set up an exchange, but had to close it down because US financial services regulations made it impossible for him to develop it into a legitimate business. Is regulation the major obstacle for Bitcoin becoming more widely used? Does anyone have any idea what specific regulations are the problem?
Without going into specific regulations (which of course depend very much on the jurisdiction in question); probably the biggest problem is legal uncertainty.

Bitcoin just doesn't fit nicely into many of the relevant regulatory frameworks. Even the question whether Bitcoin is a currency or a commodity is still open!
Bitcoin is most certainly sui generis and there has yet to be a definitive ruling on its legal status. Before we have that, running Bitcoin businesses is unfortunately a risky venture.

Although it is common for technology to out-pace the legal system, with Bitcoin possibly disrupting the highly regulated and monopolized monetary systems around the world, this issue is not to be taken lightly.


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: acoindr on February 27, 2012, 05:06:38 PM
Ah, yes, also -

It seems to me that two things have to happen for Bitcoin to become more widely used.

1. A programme needs to be available to allow people to buy and safely hold Bitcoins that is easy to use and not time consuming.

2. Bitcoin would need to be priced and tradeable on a major exchange that people trust to provide neutral pricing data and protect their transactions.

One guy I spoke to set up an exchange, but had to close it down because US financial services regulations made it impossible for him to develop it into a legitimate business. Is regulation the major obstacle for Bitcoin becoming more widely used? Does anyone have any idea what specific regulations are the problem?

Naomi

The answers you've gotten so far I believe are spot on.

But let me add a perspective concerning wider use. Money is a funny thing. What gives it value is agreement. For example, pretty seashells and feathers have been used as money because enough people agreed to accept them.

If you were going to buy a car and the dealer offered a 50% discount if you paid in bitcoins, I think you'd quickly become interested in acquiring bitcoins too. The items listed will come about naturally. For example, I had sent you a PM about Safeb.it (http://angel.co/safebit#overview) which solves number 1, and Mt.Gox.com (https://mtgox.com/), the largest current exchange, essentially answers number 2 already.

Bitcoin has a bit of a chicken and egg problem, but one which will likely work itself out because of its favorable features over current "money".

Bitcoin is growing at a phenomenal rate with no signs of slowing down. Nothing of it existed prior to Jan. 3, 2009, and now a search for "bitcoin" returns 12 million results on Google. Even you noted the global response you've gotten.

Regulations are perhaps a speed bump slowing some parts of development towards much wider spread use, but they certainly won't prevent it.


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on February 27, 2012, 05:33:55 PM
Quote
Even the question whether Bitcoin is a currency or a commodity is still open!

Or as a payment system as David Birch outlines in this new video on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jgbk9BIVlQ

Bear in mind, there's a myriad of uses for Bitcoin that have yet to be thought of. Some have been thought of, but not quite yet implemented, e.g., as a voting mechanism, where every vote counts via micro-payments. That can't be accomplished with any other currency or payment system online.

Imagine, if you will, able to vote for contestants on The X Factor (UK version) without incurring a phone surcharge, where every .01 EUR (or 0.00273639 BTC) donated equates to one vote, and every bitcoin collected goes to a pre-decided charity, with the possibility of changing it weekly. Each contestant could attach themselves to a charity or, versa visa, charities can attach themselves to a contestant. It'll be a win-win for all parties involved. If a viewer chooses to, they can even see for themselves the exact vote tally on the blockchain (http://blockchain.info/), thereby knowing full well that no monkey business has taken place.

Would you, Naomi, voted with bitcoins for the Dublin twins John and Edward (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_J2_t_9BmAo) on The X Factor if the charity attached to them was Medecins Sans Frontieres (http://www.msf.ie/)?

Note the following: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_X_Factor_(UK)

Quote
The first series was available to viewers only through the Northern Ireland-based ITV station UTV which is widely available in the Republic, but subsequent series have also been shown on the Irish terrestrial TV station TV3.

Series 1–4 of the UK version of The X Factor effectively included Irish viewers on an equal footing, and Irish viewers were able to vote in these series via SMS or telephone. However, for series 5 in 2008, voting from Republic of Ireland was discontinued, with the decision being blamed on new regulations introduced regarding phone competitions in the UK. In 2010 TV3 announced that Irish viewers would only be able to vote using voting numbers posted online once the live shows start. These numbers change weekly.

Important note: Many fine journalists have made the mistake of incorrectly using the following words or terms: Bitcoin; Bitcoins; bitcoin; bitcoins; BitCoin; Bit Coin; Bit Coins; bit coin; bit coins; etc. We dearly hope you use the correct spelling(s) throughout your forthcoming article, for each term has a different connotation.

~Bruno~


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: Meni Rosenfeld on February 27, 2012, 05:42:37 PM
Important note: Many fine journalists have made the mistake of incorrectly using the following words or terms: Bitcoin; Bitcoins; bitcoin; bitcoins; BitCoin; Bit Coin; Bit Coins; bit coin; bit coins; etc. We dearly hope you use the correct spelling(s) throughout your forthcoming article, for each term has a different connotation.
In particular:
1. "Bitcoin" - capitalized and singular - is the name of a protocol, the concept of using that protocol for a decentralized digital currency, a project to bring about this currency, a software to handle this currency, and an open source project to develop this software.
2. A "bitcoin" is a denominational unit of currency in Bitcoin. So you can have one bitcoin or 3 bitcoins. When used at the start of a sentence, and only then, it is capitalized.
3. There is no such thing as BitCoin, Bit Coin, Bit Coins, bit coin or bit coins.


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: zer0 on February 27, 2012, 05:46:44 PM
One guy I spoke to set up an exchange, but had to close it down because US financial services regulations made it impossible for him to develop it into a legitimate business. Is regulation the major obstacle for Bitcoin becoming more widely used? Does anyone have any idea what specific regulations are the problem?

Naomi

Look up what happened to the people who ran e-gold and 'Liberty Dollar' (Bernard von NotHaus), and all the Liberty Reserve and other exchangers rounded up in the US circa 2005-2007.

The US has always been poisonous to innovation in digital/alternate currencies which is why until now most exchangers and centralized authorities were based in Malaysia, Costa Rica, Panama, Russia/CIS and Canada


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on February 27, 2012, 05:54:37 PM
Important note: Many fine journalists have made the mistake of incorrectly using the following words or terms: Bitcoin; Bitcoins; bitcoin; bitcoins; BitCoin; Bit Coin; Bit Coins; bit coin; bit coins; etc. We dearly hope you use the correct spelling(s) throughout your forthcoming article, for each term has a different connotation.
In particular:
1. "Bitcoin" - capitalized and singular - is the name of a protocol, the concept of using that protocol for a decentralized digital currency, a project to bring about this currency, a software to handle this currency, and an open source project to develop this software.
2. A "bitcoin" is a denominational unit of currency in Bitcoin. So you can have one bitcoin or 3 bitcoins. When used at the start of a sentence, and only then, it is capitalized.
3. There is no such thing as BitCoin, Bit Coin, Bit Coins, bit coin or bit coins.

Thank you for providing this post, Meni.


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: acoindr on February 27, 2012, 05:56:21 PM
One guy I spoke to set up an exchange, but had to close it down because US financial services regulations made it impossible for him to develop it into a legitimate business. Is regulation the major obstacle for Bitcoin becoming more widely used? Does anyone have any idea what specific regulations are the problem?

Naomi

Look up what happened to the people who ran e-gold and 'Liberty Dollar' (Bernard von NotHaus), and all the Liberty Reserve and other exchangers rounded up in the US circa 2005-2007.

The US has always been poisonous to innovation in digital/alternate currencies which is why until now most were based in Malaysia, Russia/CIS and Canada

The key difference with Bitcoin, of course, is that no government can shut it down because there is no central authority to target.


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: zer0 on February 27, 2012, 05:57:19 PM
One guy I spoke to set up an exchange, but had to close it down because US financial services regulations made it impossible for him to develop it into a legitimate business. Is regulation the major obstacle for Bitcoin becoming more widely used? Does anyone have any idea what specific regulations are the problem?

Naomi

Look up what happened to the people who ran e-gold and 'Liberty Dollar' (Bernard von NotHaus), and all the Liberty Reserve and other exchangers rounded up in the US circa 2005-2007.

The US has always been poisonous to innovation in digital/alternate currencies which is why until now most were based in Malaysia, Russia/CIS and Canada

The key difference with Bitcoin, of course, is that no government can shut it down because there is no central authority to target.

Which is the true awesomeness of bitcoin, imho and total game changer in the DGC world


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: BkkCoins on February 28, 2012, 12:50:27 AM
It seems to me that two things have to happen for Bitcoin to become more widely used.

1. A programme needs to be available to allow people to buy and safely hold Bitcoins that is easy to use and not time consuming.

2. Bitcoin would need to be priced and tradeable on a major exchange that people trust to provide neutral pricing data and protect their transactions.

One guy I spoke to set up an exchange, but had to close it down because US financial services regulations made it impossible for him to develop it into a legitimate business. Is regulation the major obstacle for Bitcoin becoming more widely used? Does anyone have any idea what specific regulations are the problem?

Naomi
Have a look at blockchain.info or StrongCoin.com - they run browser based wallet websites that use encryption in the browser to protect your keys (and bitcoins). They can't steal your coins (as was a problem with early web based wallets). You can save a backup of the keys so that even if the sites get shutdown/vanish you still have full access to your bitcoins. These are very easy for beginners to use.

Also there are light-weight clients like Electrum that don't download the whole blockchain.

Regarding exchanges - there are quite a few out there now around the world. At current trading volumes it would seem only MtGox has a worthwhile business and the others are treading water waiting for more volume. Government regulation is the biggest hurdle for these businesses and after that the established financial system seems to be waking up and becoming aggressive against Bitcoin.

IMO Bitcoin needs to viewed as a commodity like gold and dealers need to be as common as jewelers worldwide. There are some small beginnings in this respect. There is websites for OTC (over the counter) trades and for locating local traders to deal with. You should be able to trade some as easily as walking into a 7-11. The more Bitcoin stays out of the way of the "dominant financial system (Wall St banks)" and grows it's own physical network the better chance it has to be strong and resilient.

In the US it's the "Bank Secrecy Act" that appears to be relevant to regulating money exchange and making life harder for Bitcoin exchanges. Other countries have equivalents that have been put in place under US pressure and international treaties.

Again IMO the most appealing aspect of Bitcoin is the potential of giving back control of money to the people. It's the ultimate democratization of money. You can be absolutely sure that those holding the reigns now aren't just going to roll over and let that happen.


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on February 28, 2012, 01:28:46 AM
Inspired by Positively Fifth Street: Murderers, Cheetahs, and Binion's World Series of Poker (http://www.amazon.com/Positively-Fifth-Street-Murderers-Cheetahs/dp/B000F9SUU8/ref=ntt_at_ep_dpt_1) by James McManus, you, Naomi, may consider entering the Satoshi Superstars (http://www.satoshisuperstars.com/) competition for a chance to win 100 BTC. I don't want to be speaking for edd (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=9378), creator of the Satoshi Superstars, but I have a feeling that if you opt to enter he, as well as this community, would probably love to see you as a contestant. Who knows, perhaps during the course of the event you'll be dished more fodder for the main Bitcoin article you're penning, with takeaways for some future literary work. At the very least, consider it.

~Bruno~


Title: Re: Reuters journalist looking for input on Bitcoin
Post by: Stephen Gornick on April 02, 2012, 05:23:31 PM
As a bookend to this thread:
 - http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/01/traders-bitcoin-idUSL6E8ET5K620120401 (Naomi's report)
 - http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=75015.0