Bitcoin Forum

Other => Off-topic => Topic started by: organofcorti on February 26, 2012, 02:12:30 AM



Title: Genital comparison study
Post by: organofcorti on February 26, 2012, 02:12:30 AM
Due to multiple off-topic comments in another thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=66187.0) I'm posting a poll here so that those with a need to can proudly proclaim the length and breadth of their tally-whackers.

If you don't have one you can use your partners' and if neither you nor your partner have one, then choose the genital size preference poll instead.

                 http://i.imgur.com/PMRAf.gif





Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on February 26, 2012, 02:36:07 AM
Here we go again! I'm still not on the chart. For sake of argument I voted E, but you wouldn't have known that if I hadn't told you for my vote was mixed with all the others who also voted E. E stands for Enlarged, correct?

~Bruno~ (maybe Bruno Diaz)


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: organofcorti on February 26, 2012, 02:42:03 AM
Here we go again! I'm still not on the chart. For sake of argument I voted E, but you wouldn't have known that if I hadn't told you for my vote was mixed with all the others who also voted E. E stands for Enlarged, correct?

~Bruno~ (maybe Bruno Diaz)


Er, yes, um that's right.

Don't worry about me knowing about your vote, I'll mix it with even more votes. No one will ever know it was yours.


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on February 26, 2012, 03:25:49 AM
Here we go again! I'm still not on the chart. For sake of argument I voted E, but you wouldn't have known that if I hadn't told you for my vote was mixed with all the others who also voted E. E stands for Enlarged, correct?

~Bruno~ (maybe Bruno Diaz)


Er, yes, um that's right.

Don't worry about me knowing about your vote, I'll mix it with even more votes. No one will ever know it was yours.

Just as no one will know that you voted A.  ;D


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: organofcorti on February 26, 2012, 03:46:54 AM
Here we go again! I'm still not on the chart. For sake of argument I voted E, but you wouldn't have known that if I hadn't told you for my vote was mixed with all the others who also voted E. E stands for Enlarged, correct?

~Bruno~ (maybe Bruno Diaz)


Er, yes, um that's right.

Don't worry about me knowing about your vote, I'll mix it with even more votes. No one will ever know it was yours.

Just as no one will know that you voted A.  ;D


How..? Never mind. Hacker.


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: bb113 on February 26, 2012, 06:07:29 AM
I was watching NASA tv one time and they were discussing the space suits. Astronauts obviously have to be able to take a piss without messing themselves, and the way this was accomplished is a modified condom hooked up to a bag. The condom needed to have a snug fit so they asked the astronauts to self report penis dimensions, offering 3 sizes: small, medium, large. It turned out 100% of astronauts had large penises.

Then they changed the name of the categories to large, huge, and gigantic while leaving the dimensions the same. This time there was a nice distribution of sizes. Then the narrator explained: Of course no astronaut wants their penis size to be recorded in government records for perpetuity as "small".

 I wonder how it works for female astronauts.


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: organofcorti on February 26, 2012, 07:20:10 AM
was going to vote but honestly couldn't be bothered with inches... will play if anyone ever does an SI version :D


SI units? Your penis is measured in .... meters?


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: drakahn on February 26, 2012, 07:32:21 AM
... lol ....

centimetres most probably, hopefully not millimetres


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: organofcorti on February 26, 2012, 07:50:47 AM
... lol ....

centimetres most probably, hopefully not millimetres

OK, I'd assumed he meant base units rather than derived units. People need to be more precise when discussing penis size. I could have assumed his penis was several orders of magnitude larger than it was, which would have skewed the results significantly.


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: organofcorti on February 27, 2012, 01:13:37 PM
Bump. Need more data. Please complete poll.


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: Exonumia on February 28, 2012, 04:29:42 PM

http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/image/images/small-bnb.gif

Hehehe heheh, he said pole.



Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: JennyHill on March 11, 2012, 11:16:03 PM
Men never really advance above the age of 12 do they? 


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: RandyFolds on March 11, 2012, 11:28:45 PM
What a ridiculous chart. If it's real, it just goes to prove that women have no clue what the length or girth of a penis actually is. I have yet to see a woman outside of a porn video that could handle eight inches, and I have yet to run into a woman who busted out a measuring tape for my junk...

It's probably for the best...the three inches of fury seems a lot larger in the dark.


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: organofcorti on March 11, 2012, 11:38:15 PM
What a ridiculous chart. If it's real, it just goes to prove that women have no clue what the length or girth of a penis actually is. I have yet to see a woman outside of a porn video that could handle eight inches, and I have yet to run into a woman who busted out a measuring tape for my junk...

It's probably for the best...the three inches of fury seems a lot larger in the dark.

I dunno. In my experience (sample size = 1) 8" * 6.5" is the mean value.


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: Matthew N. Wright on March 12, 2012, 05:10:24 AM
Men never really advance above the age of 12 do they? 

Here is proof I have. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGyh9nDG1sQ


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: JennyHill on March 12, 2012, 05:10:39 AM
Men never really advance above the age of 12 do they? 

Not intellectually, no they donít really.   

I love your avatar. You must be the staff feminist. :D


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on March 12, 2012, 05:15:31 AM
What a ridiculous chart. If it's real, it just goes to prove that women have no clue what the length or girth of a penis actually is. I have yet to see a woman outside of a porn video that could handle eight inches, and I have yet to run into a woman who busted out a measuring tape for my junk...

It's probably for the best...the three inches of fury seems a lot larger in the dark.

I dunno. In my experience (sample size = 1) 8" * 6.5" is the mean value.

WoW! I must have missed the memo. When did (") become the cm symbol? I'm about the same size as what's been mentioned so far (7.5 cm or 7.5", using the new cm symbol). That said, is there any way I can get MousePotato to stop PM'ing me?

~Phinnaeus "Long Dong" Gage~


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: JennyHill on March 12, 2012, 05:53:00 AM
Men never really advance above the age of 12 do they? 

Not intellectually, no they donít really.   

I love your avatar. You must be the staff feminist. :D

Yes, I am. It's my responsibility to pat down all of the women on this forum before bedtime.

On topic: Wow that chart is really long and fat.

Edit: I thought you said chauvinist. I always get those two words mixed up.
.

cheeky monkey  :)


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: RandyFolds on March 12, 2012, 07:13:35 PM
Men never really advance above the age of 12 do they?  

Not intellectually, no they donít really.  

I love your avatar. You must be the staff feminist. :D

Yes, I am. It's my responsibility to pat down all of the single woman on this forum before bedtime.




Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: Ean on March 12, 2012, 08:55:18 PM
Men never really advance above the age of 12 do they? 

They don't have to since women prefer men at the same intellectual level.


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: ZodiacDragon84 on March 13, 2012, 01:11:22 AM
Men never really advance above the age of 12 do they? 

Not intellectually, no they donít really.   

I love your avatar. You must be the staff feminist. :D

He he. Staff


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: LoupGaroux on March 14, 2012, 03:09:27 AM
Guys, we really don't need to worry about accuracy for this poll, for their entire post-pubescent life, all females are told that any fleshy tubular object or appendage that approximates the size of the little finger on our left hand is 9 inches.

You wanna be the one that blows that myth?


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: organofcorti on March 14, 2012, 07:09:21 AM
I agree. If you do want to post sizes and discuss them, please convert to 'ells' first. That will bewilder all but the most resolutely scottish of women.

PS Haha! He said 'blow'!


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: JennyHill on March 17, 2012, 02:38:31 PM
@organofcorti

Why donít you make a post for women having them state their preference for penis size. Then you could compare the results. 


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: organofcorti on March 17, 2012, 02:53:05 PM
I wanted to, but there were two problems:

1. In order to provide appropriate granularity and with the polling available from the forum, I'd need sixty options - 30 for length and 30 for circumference. A list that long would be confusing and the data hard to export.

2. There would be significant skew caused by males voting up their own particular size in the vain hope that actual women would look at the results and think 'Well I never, 3 and a half by three inches is favoured by the majority of women? What am I missing out on? Hmmmm. Perhaps I should try one".


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on March 17, 2012, 03:06:36 PM
I wanted to, but there were two problems:

1. In order to provide appropriate granularity and with the polling available from the forum, I'd need sixty options - 30 for length and 30 for circumference. A list that long would be confusing and the data hard to export.

2. There would be significant skew caused by males voting up their own particular size in the vain hope that actual women would look at the results and think 'Well I never, 3 and a half by three inches is favoured by the majority of women? What am I missing out on? Hmmmm. Perhaps I should try one".

MousePotato in 3, 2, 1...


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: JennyHill on March 17, 2012, 03:13:53 PM
I wanted to, but there were two problems:

1. In order to provide appropriate granularity and with the polling available from the forum, I'd need sixty options - 30 for length and 30 for circumference. A list that long would be confusing and the data hard to export.

2. There would be significant skew caused by males voting up their own particular size in the vain hope that actual women would look at the results and think 'Well I never, 3 and a half by three inches is favoured by the majority of women? What am I missing out on? Hmmmm. Perhaps I should try one".

Thatís a good point. Size doesnít matter anyway if they have a talented tongue and strong jaw muscles.


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on March 17, 2012, 03:22:10 PM
I wanted to, but there were two problems:

1. In order to provide appropriate granularity and with the polling available from the forum, I'd need sixty options - 30 for length and 30 for circumference. A list that long would be confusing and the data hard to export.

2. There would be significant skew caused by males voting up their own particular size in the vain hope that actual women would look at the results and think 'Well I never, 3 and a half by three inches is favoured by the majority of women? What am I missing out on? Hmmmm. Perhaps I should try one".

Thatís a good point. Size doesnít matter anyway if they have a talented tongue and strong jaw muscles.

I used to date this girl in Tunica, MS, who's now a lead prosecuting attorney in Memphis, TN. We used to both just sit on the bed in the hotel room and watch each other (what's another word for masturbate?), for that's how she got her rocks off. Finally, we were going to do the nasty, but just before penetration, she bellowed, "I object!" (true story)

A couple weeks ago, I was at this alpaca farm...

~Bruno~


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: triplehelix on March 17, 2012, 04:58:36 PM
if anyone is interested, or possibly feeling intimidated by this chart, its been railed against and debunked across the net for years.


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on March 17, 2012, 05:19:08 PM
if anyone is interested, or possibly feeling intimidated by this chart, its been railed against and debunked across the net for years.

There's a chart? Is there one showing preferred sizes for women? I'm pretty sure that in this case bigger is not better, but would love to see a chart nonetheless. I wish I'd seen one for a couple weeks ago, for I was visiting this alpaca farm...

~Bruno~


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: triplehelix on March 17, 2012, 05:27:52 PM
if anyone is interested, or possibly feeling intimidated by this chart, its been railed against and debunked across the net for years.

There's a chart? Is there one showing preferred sizes for women? I'm pretty sure that in this case bigger is not better, but would love to see a chart nonetheless. I wish I'd seen one for a couple weeks ago, for I was visiting this alpaca farm...

~Bruno~

you mean besides the one in the original post?

i've not run across any other charts claiming to accurately represent all women's preferences, but i've seen this posted on various sites like jezebel, and read responses from women, and they think its ridiculous.

just the idea that there is a consensus on preference is silly.  ask 100 guys what size/shape butt they like and you'll get answers all over the board.  ask 100 women what ANYthing they prefer and you'll get answers up and down the option list.


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on March 17, 2012, 05:41:54 PM
if anyone is interested, or possibly feeling intimidated by this chart, its been railed against and debunked across the net for years.

There's a chart? Is there one showing preferred sizes for women? I'm pretty sure that in this case bigger is not better, but would love to see a chart nonetheless. I wish I'd seen one for a couple weeks ago, for I was visiting this alpaca farm...

~Bruno~

you mean besides the one in the original post?

i've not run across any other charts claiming to accurately represent all women's preferences, but i've seen this posted on various sites like jezebel, and read responses from women, and they think its ridiculous.

just the idea that there is a consensus on preference is silly.  ask 100 guys what size/shape butt they like and you'll get answers all over the board.  ask 100 women what ANYthing they prefer and you'll get answers up and down the option list.


I was in reference to the ideal size of a woman from a man's perspective, hence larger is not really better, unless you're RandyFolds and you'll take anything, then lie about the event while he and her were on some waterfall.  ;D

~Bruno~


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: triplehelix on March 17, 2012, 05:50:10 PM
if anyone is interested, or possibly feeling intimidated by this chart, its been railed against and debunked across the net for years.

There's a chart? Is there one showing preferred sizes for women? I'm pretty sure that in this case bigger is not better, but would love to see a chart nonetheless. I wish I'd seen one for a couple weeks ago, for I was visiting this alpaca farm...

~Bruno~

you mean besides the one in the original post?

i've not run across any other charts claiming to accurately represent all women's preferences, but i've seen this posted on various sites like jezebel, and read responses from women, and they think its ridiculous.

just the idea that there is a consensus on preference is silly.  ask 100 guys what size/shape butt they like and you'll get answers all over the board.  ask 100 women what ANYthing they prefer and you'll get answers up and down the option list.


I was in reference to the ideal size of a woman from a man's perspective, hence larger is not really better, unless you're RandyFolds and you'll take anything, then lie about the event while he and her were on some waterfall.  ;D

~Bruno~


ah, well then you might actually like to know the chart in the op is from a mans perspective.  one single dude with no statistical analysis on any data at all.

guys get too hung up on the size thing.  just wanted to curtail the potential ego bruising and anxiety silly things like this chart can lead too.


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on March 17, 2012, 10:37:33 PM
if anyone is interested, or possibly feeling intimidated by this chart, its been railed against and debunked across the net for years.

There's a chart? Is there one showing preferred sizes for women? I'm pretty sure that in this case bigger is not better, but would love to see a chart nonetheless. I wish I'd seen one for a couple weeks ago, for I was visiting this alpaca farm...

~Bruno~

you mean besides the one in the original post?

i've not run across any other charts claiming to accurately represent all women's preferences, but i've seen this posted on various sites like jezebel, and read responses from women, and they think its ridiculous.

just the idea that there is a consensus on preference is silly.  ask 100 guys what size/shape butt they like and you'll get answers all over the board.  ask 100 women what ANYthing they prefer and you'll get answers up and down the option list.


I was in reference to the ideal size of a woman from a man's perspective, hence larger is not really better, unless you're RandyFolds and you'll take anything, then lie about the event while he and her were on some waterfall.  ;D

~Bruno~


ah, well then you might actually like to know the chart in the op is from a mans perspective.  one single dude with no statistical analysis on any data at all.

guys get too hung up on the size thing.  just wanted to curtail the potential ego bruising and anxiety silly things like this chart can lead too.

I'm going to try to do this again for the third time, but without beating around the hairy bush. I was in reference to the ideal size of a woman's pussy from a man's perspective, hence larger is not really better, for I like to fuck a nice tight pussy (of legal age). Now, I have to go take a nice cold shower after typing that. When I get back, I don't want to read a post directing me toward the man's penis size chart again. I want a chart showing the ideal pussy size from a man's viewpoint, albeit from a woman's perspective would work just as well.

~Bruno, or somebody else who hijacked my user account on this forum~


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: triplehelix on March 18, 2012, 12:25:44 AM
!!!  sorry, one of my midget terrorists gave me his bug and i'm a little jacked up on the cold meds.  sloooooow on the uptake.

i'll assume "beating around the bush" was an unintended pun?


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: rjk on March 18, 2012, 12:33:34 AM
!!!  sorry, one of my midget terrorists gave me his bug and i'm a little jacked up on the cold meds.  sloooooow on the uptake.

i'll assume "beating around the bush" was an unintended pun?
Looks pretty intentional to me. ;D


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on March 18, 2012, 03:37:56 PM
!!!  sorry, one of my midget terrorists gave me his bug and i'm a little jacked up on the cold meds.  sloooooow on the uptake.

i'll assume "beating around the bush" was an unintended pun?
Looks pretty intentional to me. ;D

During the penning process, I was going to include "(pun intended)" but deemed it unnecessary after I modified "bush" with "hairy". (does the period (<--no pun(s) intended-->) go inside the quote?)

Sorry for the bluntness of that post, for I truly wasn't trying to be an ass. That said, WHERE'S MY FUCKIN CHART?  ;D

~Cackling Bear~


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: LoupGaroux on March 18, 2012, 06:47:48 PM
No chart required... the ideal pussy size is the size of whatever pussy is within reach. Just like the perfect breast size is the size of any breast you are testing. Duh, we're guys, there is no such thing as "wrong pussy" or "bad breasts"!


Title: Re: Genital comparison study
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on March 18, 2012, 11:43:42 PM
No chart required... the ideal pussy size is the size of whatever pussy is within reach. Just like the perfect breast size is the size of any breast you are testing. Duh, we're guys, there is no such thing as "wrong pussy" or "bad breasts"!

Oops! Misread that before I went out with this chick today, taking your advice. I thought it read "bad pussy" or "wrong breasts". Now the smelly tans-cunt wants me to marry her.