|
Title: Signature Question Post by: marlboro.gold on July 01, 2014, 05:11:45 AM how have Signature link image ? pls member tell me here . thanks for watching !
Title: Re: Signature Question Post by: ProudMiner on July 01, 2014, 05:18:21 AM You cannot have an image in your signature, it is not allowed.
Title: Re: Signature Question Post by: marlboro.gold on July 01, 2014, 05:27:00 AM oh . thanks for you comment :(
Title: Re: Signature Question Post by: kuusj98 on July 01, 2014, 04:08:47 PM For the record, not allowed on any rank, not Sr. member, not Hero member.
You can have coloured text at some point I beleve (well I have it in my sig and i'm a SR. member... Hmm) Title: Re: Signature Question Post by: Zebra on July 02, 2014, 03:42:48 AM Just a side note, once upon a time (before Nov 2011), signature images are allowed. :D
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=51077.0 Title: Re: Signature Question Post by: theymos on July 02, 2014, 04:00:00 AM Just a side note, once upon a time (before Nov 2011), signature images are allowed. :D https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=51077.0 Wow, I forgot how bad the user response was after that. Now hardly anyone even remembers it... There are also security problems: Images can be used to execute cookie stuffing and cross-site request forgery attacks; they use a lot of bandwidth; and they prevent bitcointalk.org's HTTPS from appearing totally "kosher" to browsers. These issues could be solved by hosting all images at bitcointalk.org, but this isn't worth the trouble. I guess I decided that it was worth the trouble after all. ;) Title: Re: Signature Question Post by: RoadStress on July 02, 2014, 06:39:31 AM Just a side note, once upon a time (before Nov 2011), signature images are allowed. :D https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=51077.0 Wow, I forgot how bad the user response was after that. Now hardly anyone even remembers it... There are also security problems: Images can be used to execute cookie stuffing and cross-site request forgery attacks; they use a lot of bandwidth; and they prevent bitcointalk.org's HTTPS from appearing totally "kosher" to browsers. These issues could be solved by hosting all images at bitcointalk.org, but this isn't worth the trouble. I guess I decided that it was worth the trouble after all. ;) /joke on So you can do your own stuffing :) /joke off Title: Re: Signature Question Post by: coinbroker on July 04, 2014, 08:17:47 AM - Newbie: No styling (including links) allowed. Max 40 characters. - Jr. Member: Links allowed. Max 100 characters. - Member: Unlimited length. - Full: Color allowed. - Sr. Member: Size allowed - Hero: Background color allowed hope this helps. Title: Re: Signature Question Post by: jambola2 on July 05, 2014, 06:19:33 AM Just a side note, once upon a time (before Nov 2011), signature images are allowed. :D https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=51077.0 Wow, I forgot how bad the user response was after that. Now hardly anyone even remembers it... There are also security problems: Images can be used to execute cookie stuffing and cross-site request forgery attacks; they use a lot of bandwidth; and they prevent bitcointalk.org's HTTPS from appearing totally "kosher" to browsers. These issues could be solved by hosting all images at bitcointalk.org, but this isn't worth the trouble. I guess I decided that it was worth the trouble after all. ;) Wouldn't it be possible to use the forum image proxy like we do for posted images , for signatures and avatars ? I guess there would be more images posted than avatars or signatures, so it wouldn't put too much additional strain on the servers. Title: Re: Signature Question Post by: theymos on July 05, 2014, 04:08:58 PM Wouldn't it be possible to use the forum image proxy like we do for posted images , for signatures and avatars ? I guess there would be more images posted than avatars or signatures, so it wouldn't put too much additional strain on the servers. Signature images would still be way too distracting/messy, and the problems with paid signatures would become much worse. |