Bitcoin Forum

How useful are autobets/autorolls in playing dice?

Does it make a difference?

It's a lot more convenient if you wanna play a certain tactic and don't wanna be forced to spamclick

if u have a well set plan/tactic , it's a good strategy if u aint home :)

Where is the best autobet you knew sir?

It depends on what the gambler prefer

For example :
If you want to roll with 9900x payout
It's very small chance that you'll hit the payout

I'm sure you'll had spam click overtime

Then auto roll is the best option  :)

autobet is useful when you're simply tired and just want some rolls while not even looking at the screen :D

I think it's essential these days in dice gambling, why pay attention to something when you can chuck a tv show on and do both?

Its become a great part of the online community. You can set up the auto bet system the way you want it to be and then go do something else. Makes it much more convenient.

it is so useful since you can do something else while your browser automaticly places the bets for you and also you don't have to spam click

People use autobets and automatic betting mostly for using strategies while gambling at dice.

it is so useful since you can do something else while your browser automaticly places the bets for you and loses everything after quite a while.

That's how the house edge works  :P

It makes u lose your money faster..

I guess if you have a winning system that works with it, use it.
Never successful for me, though.

Some strategies involve, betting at say 10% till you get aound 5 losses, and martingaling after that. However 5 losses in a row, happen rarely and might take upto 100,000 rolls. Autobet, can let you make those bets fast and without having to press the button, and stop betting after 5 losses. I then usually, continue with a martingale after that.

You will lose anyways.

A sanely-implemented system should permit you to set the odds and returns of the available bets, the betting limits, the amount you are willing to lose, and the amount you would like to win. It should report to you your odds of winning. It should then make it easy to execute the computed strategy. And once you win, you are done. If it makes it easy to repeat the strategy, it is fundamentally broken and likely made by someone who doesn't understand the entire point of betting strategies.

if u use autobets when u play dice, of course u lost ur money ;)

What? Do you know what your talking about?

yeah, because im always lose when i play dice and use autobets.

A system like this would basically show you that autobet is useless, every strategy is the same, and you should probably place a single bet with the profit you're aiming at.

Not so. Some systems provide a very low probability of losing and a very high probability of winning.

Betting systems let you choose between this:

You have a one in a million chance of winning $700,000, otherwise you lose $1.

And this:

You have a one in a million chance of losing $1,300,000, otherwise you win $1.

That is, they adjust the odds of winning, the odds of losing, the amount you win, and the amount you lose. Typical progressive betting systems provide a very low probability that you will lose. In compensation, the amount you can win is very small relative to the amount you can lose.

I have seen many people using auto bet option I think they have some good strategies to win the game. I don't use auto bet option.

Aside from using them, some people also make their own bots.

In wich way this is different than betting $1 with 1/700000 chanche of winning, or betting 1300000 with 99.999... % chanche?

Typically you're not offered those options. If you are, then there's no point in using a betting system.

No, there isn't a real difference, so you could use autorolls to avoid wasting time yourself  ;)

no matter what you do, the house edge remains the same. you CANNOT do anything to change this! you WILL LOSE in the long run.

Yep, exactly what I was meaning: autobet are useless, we only need more customizable odds

Absolutely true.

Absolutely false. You can make this highly unlikely with betting systems. The vast majority of people who use a betting system correctly will win.

These are not incompatible. Imagine a system where you have a 99% chance of winning $1 and a 1% chance of losing $200 and the total number of bets required is always less than 100. The house certainly has a huge edge. But the vast majority of people who use this system will win. And there can never be a "long run" because the total number of bets required by the system is always less than 100.

it's true. if you find a method to auto script then it is only valid for a period of 2 days, after which it will not work.
safer to manually bet

Fuck it.

PD autobet option sucks.

It will roll your dice for you even while you are sleeping  :D :D

auto bets doesnt make difference its just for lazy people like me  :D

The majority will win, yet some will lose big. If anything autobetting is in the hosts favour.

I doubt it. When time -> infinity the house will always win. Its something gambling sites have to make you think you are winning.

In my opinion manual works better but its a lot slower
Might just be because your playing sides
That said bots are a lot faster so easier to process

Yes, you can lose all your money doing nothing. Avoid those bots and things like that, you won't do anything better with them.

On PD autobet is good to reach certain achievements.

In general is good to try martingale or other strategies

It's good to use them if you KNOW how to use them. Most people run the bot and go to fb and lose everything of course.

The bold part says it all. If the house has an edge, YOU WILL LOSE whatever betting system you use. Vast majority (99 out of 100) will win negligible amounts (1$) and 1 person will lose a big amount (200$). This will give the house a profit of 100$. Who loses this? The players. When this thing is repeated a 100 times (long run), everybody will lose (100$ each) and the house will win 10,000$ mathematically.

So yes, if there is a house edge YOU WILL EVENTUALLY LOSE.

Thats not what most people do. Bots also take away the fun of gambling, so I think most people to it manually.

That is what I always say.

Sooner or later you will end up in the $200 loss group, and I guess before you can win more than 200 times $1

Yes mathematically you will lose once every 100 games/bets.

PD sucks

Deposited a million times.

No winnings.

Always lose.

Winning is possible for sure. See this post:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=873818.msg9658969#msg9658969

http://s29.postimg.org/kmfjhy6vb/image.jpg (http://postimage.org/)
free picture hosting (http://postimage.org/)

CD

If you want to say that the expected outcome is a loss, that's certainly correct. But it's incorrect to argue that everybody loses in the long run. If you don't see why, apply your same argument to a lottery. Certainly there's a house edge. But it is manifestly false to claim that everyone loses in the long run. The house cannot force you to play if you don't want to. In your example of 100 people, if those 100 people all choose not to play anymore, then 99 out of 100 people have won -- even in the long run since none of them are betting any more.

Ya its great for the players who want to make more at once as well as to lose at a once lol  :P

same i tried it, and noticed something not good, like when you are winning, and then suddently you change the size, you end up losing

i don't like it at all

i think a bot it's not good here because it follow a pattern that eventually will fail, as you need different one each time, you will end up losing

So bro ! The wining in any casino or any dice site is only depend on your luck as well as some skills which can work only 10% in it