|
Title: Looking to buy $2300 in coins Post by: matthewkeneithy on November 21, 2014, 11:30:58 PM Paying bitstamp +2% at most. Can pretty much do any payment methods. Have cash in hand.
Call/Text 313-520-0910 Title: Re: Looking to buy $2300 in coins Post by: ButtterBet on November 21, 2014, 11:32:02 PM I can do this depending on where you live. I would like to get cash in person.
Title: Re: Looking to buy $2300 in coins Post by: DannyHamilton on November 22, 2014, 12:33:17 AM Paying bitstamp +2% at most. Can pretty much do any payment methods. Have cash in hand. Call/Text 313-520-0910 I can do this if you're willing to pay BitStamp + 5%. Let me know if you're interested. I'll send you a txt. He is a scammer. Don't deal with him. I suspect that you're right, but I'm willing to give him a chance. Title: Re: Looking to buy $2300 in coins Post by: Tomatocage on November 22, 2014, 02:24:19 AM Paying bitstamp +2% at most. Can pretty much do any payment methods. Have cash in hand. Call/Text 313-520-0910 I can do this if you're willing to pay BitStamp + 5%. Let me know if you're interested. I'll send you a txt. Any progress with this deal? I'll gladly reevaluate my rating on him if he is indeed an honest trader. Title: Re: Looking to buy $2300 in coins Post by: BlindMayorBitcorn on November 22, 2014, 02:25:55 AM Paying bitstamp +2% at most. Can pretty much do any payment methods. Have cash in hand. Call/Text 313-520-0910 I can do this if you're willing to pay BitStamp + 5%. Let me know if you're interested. I'll send you a txt. Any progress with this deal? I'll gladly reevaluate my rating on him if he is indeed an honest trader. It was a pretty damaging rating :-\ Title: Re: Looking to buy $2300 in coins Post by: Tomatocage on November 22, 2014, 02:32:38 AM It was a pretty damaging rating :-\ That was the point. Title: Re: Looking to buy $2300 in coins Post by: BlindMayorBitcorn on November 22, 2014, 02:37:47 AM It was a pretty damaging rating :-\ That was the point. Anyway I just took a look at his scant post history. It speaks for itself. Point taken |