Bitcoin Forum

2014 top 40 coinmarketcap listings month by month

Courtesy of coinmarketcap.com and archive.org (arbitrarily grabbed from archive.org, parsed and rendered):

https://minkiz.co/coin/infographics/c

Poster (nearly all coins, assets mostly excluded):
https://i.imgur.com/DUfYbxy.png (https://minkiz.co/coin/infographics/c)

^^^^ click to see the larger picture :) (interactive, names as tooltips)



Solstice felicitations.

Cheers

Graham

Starting in August, you can actually see Stellar's rocket moving upward in the direction it's pointing in the logo.

Thanks. Chrome tells me not to click though.

Cool infographic.

Minor correction: Paycoin was removed from CMC recently so the Dec. column shouldn't have it.

Awesome! Very interesting. :)

Thanks.

Firefox here. It keeps throwing up a "connection is untrusted" message.

good job !

I think the cert expired or something. I wouldn't worry about OP or his website, he's one of the (very few) good guys in alts.

I cant click also, just post it on here

The BEL-EPA Certificate Authority Root cert isn't in the browser's list of pre-approved (commercial) CAs.

A (randomly-chosen) SSL cert checking service reports everything pretty much as expected: http://www.networking4all.com/en/support/tools/site+check/report/?fqdn=minkiz.co&protocol=https

http-over-ssl is rapidly becoming a matter of basic communications privacy rather than anything to do with “trust”. The site uses mod_gnutls' Server Name Indication (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication) to enable https connections to a small number of web apps running off've a single machine/IP address.

A self-signed CA cert avoids the charges imposed by the pre-approved commercial jackals certificate authorities such as GoDaddy.

The connection will be trusted if I pay for a GoDaddy-signed cert but that's a definition of “trusted” that sticks in my craw.


Cheers

Graham

same here, says untrusted. anyone can post pics?

what was the deal with paycoin. Haven't followed it - another scam?

Nice post. Like the information.

I shall leave the Paycoin entry as is, if that's alright by you, as I don't wish to introduce a spurious sense of accuracy.

In order to reflect the ad hoc nature of the archive.org polling cycle I used a “first convenient coinmarketcap.com index page from 2014-MM stashed in archive.org” selection algo. In consequence, it obviously it raises the question: if a randomly-chosen day isn't considered accurately representative, then what's the “proper” strategy to take, assuming we have a complete record?

And obviously, I need to put more effort into bending the gnutls technology to my will.

For the interim, here's an accessible version:

http://chrome.bel-epa.com/share/top40.html

Solstice salutations.

Cheers

Graham

But I do feel compelled to update the graphic (done) to correct a transcription error in which Fuelcoin2's ”FC2” trading symbol has become confused with Firecoin2's “FC2” trading symbol.

(I'm not entirely convinced that the FuelCoin2 FC2 symbol isn't just a bit of wishful thinking by those concerned  --- the FuelCoin2 github repos source for src/qt/bitcoinunits.cpp is empty, as are many others in the repos.)

Cheers

Graham

nice info, gd job