|
Title: Re: gambling on more than one site at a time Post by: TheGambler on January 19, 2015, 01:22:12 AM don't see how it would make any different to the final result.
Title: Re: Re: gambling on more than one site at a time Post by: Quickseller on January 19, 2015, 01:49:15 AM I really have not been closely monitoring the gambling section anymore. If you look at my sent trust you will see that other then the trust I just left for this guy now that I was made aware that he is running a ponzi you will see that I have left 1 ponzi related negative since the 14th of January
Title: Re: Re: gambling on more than one site at a time Post by: raganius on January 19, 2015, 01:58:54 AM https://i.imgur.com/3EpY0W7.png -- Moved his thread, but for some reason moved it back Below is what was posted on blg42598/a447513372's thread when I found him out along with how Quickseller does not leave any negative feedbacks to accounts he has done business with... SO TO ALL POTENTIAL PONZI OWNERS OUT THERE! 1. PM Quickseller 2. Buy an account from him 3. You won't get negative trust from him for owning a ponzi scheme = Success, you can now scam without your real account being revealed! Until of course I come along and run it for you. Ponzi thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=927394 This just goes to show Quickseller is a biased trust abuser. Account sellers are harming this forum, personally can't believe you trust this fool. Evidence a447513372 is the alt of blg42598 - See Evidence Below https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=919795.msg10106113#msg10106113 - blg42598 looking for RPC, used to automatically send and receive payments. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=908735.msg9988362#msg9988362 - looking for blockchain-like API for any altcoin, just like cryptodouble had. he has around 5-10 posts in this 30 post thread and posted 8 minutes after it was launched: https://i.imgur.com/hRYYh74.png also paid .38BTC for an account with Quickseller: https://i.imgur.com/XB1Oxom.png Notice how QuickSeller hasn't left neg on a447513372 yet probably due to the fact blg did business with him. His ratings are completely biased. All the evidence proves he is the owner, so if this scams blame blg42598 as well as a447513372 as they are the same person. I have also received an unfair biased negative trust from this guy. What can I do? Nothing, as the BTC Talk account seller is more trustworthy than me in this community, as it seems ::) Title: Re: Re: gambling on more than one site at a time Post by: a447513372 on January 19, 2015, 01:59:27 AM If this was sold by Quicksilver then this account has changed hands multiple times. I purchased this from another user. not bg498
Title: Re: Re: gambling on more than one site at a time Post by: Quickseller on January 19, 2015, 02:01:58 AM I have also received an unfair biased negative trust from this guy. What can I do? Nothing, as the BTC Talk account seller is more trustworthy then me in this community, as it seems ::) Your negative trust was left a long time ago and this is the first complaint I have received about it. You were suggested to be used as escrow despite your lack of trust within the community, then when I requested a more trustworthy escrow be used the other party backed out of the trade. Title: Re: Re: gambling on more than one site at a time Post by: shorena on January 19, 2015, 09:35:30 AM -snip- Thanks for the PM, I read Meta anyway when I have time. IMHO this could have been handled with a single PM to Quickseller. With the past you two had this looks more like an retaliation attempt than a honest complaint I really have not been closely monitoring the gambling section anymore. If you look at my sent trust you will see that other then the trust I just left for this guy now that I was made aware that he is running a ponzi you will see that I have left 1 ponzi related negative since the 14th of January As they posted here and as is my own experience with the section the activity against ponzis died down a bit. There have been plenty tiresome discussions and the conclusion seems to be: we disagree (those running and playing the ponzis and those that consider them a scam). |
