Bitcoin Forum

Other => CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware => Topic started by: 420 on July 28, 2012, 07:47:16 PM



Title: GTX 680 Mining IS Profitable
Post by: 420 on July 28, 2012, 07:47:16 PM
Just got my 4GB GTX 680 installed, my GTX 570 got 140Mhash at overclock but the 680 is more profitable, here's why:

The GTX 680 gets 120MHash with slight overclock but only uses 100 watts extra!

At 0.10/kWH it gets back a little over twice the BTC (@ $9/BTC) than it uses in electricity, this is when it's mining when the PC is normally on anyway

Added my stats to the page:
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_hardware_comparison#Nvidia


Title: Re: GTX 680 Mining IS Profitable
Post by: Dexter770221 on July 28, 2012, 08:28:35 PM
I doubt that it consumes only 100W at full load.


Title: Re: GTX 680 Mining IS Profitable
Post by: 420 on July 28, 2012, 08:30:18 PM
I doubt that it consumes only 100W at full load.

my BACk-UPS load reads 165 before i open mining, 265 after i open the script


Title: Re: GTX 680 Mining IS Profitable
Post by: 50BTC.com on July 28, 2012, 10:27:22 PM
I doubt that it consumes only 100W at full load.

my BACk-UPS load reads 165 before i open mining, 265 after i open the script

Sound probable, 680 consumes ~170W at full load.


Title: Re: GTX 680 Mining IS Profitable
Post by: mrb on July 28, 2012, 11:20:28 PM
OP's numbers look plausible.

We established in other threads that current miners are unable to fully exploit the theoretical performance of the GTX 680, so the chip must not be running at "full load", hence the low 100W power consumption.


Title: Re: GTX 680 Mining IS Profitable
Post by: Dargo on July 29, 2012, 12:40:18 AM
I doubt that it consumes only 100W at full load.

my BACk-UPS load reads 165 before i open mining, 265 after i open the script

So the difference between idle and load is 100 watts. But the card is consuming more than 100 watts at load.


Title: Re: GTX 680 Mining IS Profitable
Post by: 420 on July 29, 2012, 02:32:11 AM
OP's numbers look plausible.

We established in other threads that current miners are unable to fully exploit the theoretical performance of the GTX 680, so the chip must not be running at "full load", hence the low 100W power consumption.
like its using 100% of 256 CUDA cores or something

anything they could change in drivers or miners that could improve the mhash?


Title: Re: GTX 680 Mining IS Profitable
Post by: 420 on July 29, 2012, 02:50:40 AM
I doubt that it consumes only 100W at full load.

my BACk-UPS load reads 165 before i open mining, 265 after i open the script

So the difference between idle and load is 100 watts. But the card is consuming more than 100 watts at load.

right right. I guess i may need to adjust if I'm misrepresenting what's supposed to be on the form

I mean the difference between having the card in and computer on and then running mining while the computer's on is only 100 more watts


Title: Re: GTX 680 Mining IS Profitable
Post by: -ck on July 29, 2012, 04:03:57 AM
OP's numbers look plausible.

We established in other threads that current miners are unable to fully exploit the theoretical performance of the GTX 680, so the chip must not be running at "full load", hence the low 100W power consumption.
like its using 100% of 256 CUDA cores or something

anything they could change in drivers or miners that could improve the mhash?
Nope bitcoin mining needs good integer performance and that is something no nvidia device has. Drivers and software can't fix that.


Title: Re: GTX 680 Mining IS Profitable
Post by: mrb on July 29, 2012, 06:50:24 AM
Nope bitcoin mining needs good integer performance and that is something no nvidia device has. Drivers and software can't fix that.

Actually I estimated here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=73627.0) that the GTX 680 should be theoretically capable of 300-475 Mhash/s (it still sucks compared to AMD GPUs though).


Title: Re: GTX 680 Mining IS Profitable
Post by: 420 on July 29, 2012, 06:56:26 AM
Nope bitcoin mining needs good integer performance and that is something no nvidia device has. Drivers and software can't fix that.

Actually I estimated here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=73627.0) that the GTX 680 should be theoretically capable of 300-475 Mhash/s (it still sucks compared to AMD GPUs though).

okay, how to get that? :)

TDP says 62% load 98->99%
118->120.5mhash

with youtube playing, gpu to 1280mhz memory only boosted 52mhz dont think that matters for hasing


Title: Re: GTX 680 Mining IS Profitable
Post by: mrb on July 29, 2012, 07:41:22 AM
okay, how to get that? :)

You write your own miner and properly optimize it to exploit the performance of the GTX 680 :)


Title: Re: GTX 680 Mining IS Profitable
Post by: 420 on July 29, 2012, 07:04:23 PM
okay, how to get that? :)

You write your own miner and properly optimize it to exploit the performance of the GTX 680 :)

OK be back in 8 months

EDIT: I'll give 4BTC to anyone can get me 300+Mhash on it


Title: Re: GTX 680 Mining IS Profitable
Post by: ssateneth on July 30, 2012, 01:26:51 AM
Hmm.

Spend $500 on a 680 GTX and get 120 mhash overclocked.

Or...

Spend $250 on a 5970 and get 650 mhash undervolted.

HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM............

If you want to use square wheels on your vehicle, then by all means... it's not going to be the most efficient or fastest route though, and people will probably point and laugh at you or give you weird looks.
"Yeah, I got square wheels, but I can still make it to work! I only have to pay half my paycheck in gas too!"


Title: Re: GTX 680 Mining IS Profitable
Post by: 420 on July 30, 2012, 01:39:55 AM
Hmm.

Spend $500 on a 680 GTX and get 120 mhash overclocked.

Or...

Spend $250 on a 5970 and get 650 mhash undervolted.

HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM............

If you want to use square wheels on your vehicle, then by all means... it's not going to be the most efficient or fastest route though, and people will probably point and laugh at you or give you weird looks.
"Yeah, I got square wheels, but I can still make it to work! I only have to pay half my paycheck in gas too!"

OR

already have a 680 for editing

on off time use it to mine


Title: Re: GTX 680 Mining IS Profitable
Post by: -ck on July 30, 2012, 04:41:41 AM
Nope bitcoin mining needs good integer performance and that is something no nvidia device has. Drivers and software can't fix that.

Actually I estimated here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=73627.0) that the GTX 680 should be theoretically capable of 300-475 Mhash/s (it still sucks compared to AMD GPUs though).
Well I guess you estimated wrong then.


Title: Re: GTX 680 Mining IS Profitable
Post by: OmegaNemesis28 on July 30, 2012, 09:09:58 PM
Nope bitcoin mining needs good integer performance and that is something no nvidia device has. Drivers and software can't fix that.

Actually I estimated here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=73627.0) that the GTX 680 should be theoretically capable of 300-475 Mhash/s (it still sucks compared to AMD GPUs though).

okay, how to get that? :)

TDP says 62% load 98->99%
118->120.5mhash

with youtube playing, gpu to 1280mhz memory only boosted 52mhz dont think that matters for hasing

No, memory clock does nothing for mining. In fact, underclock the memory to slightly decrease heat output and reduce temperatures. Put it at like 700-900 mhz when mining for extended times.


Title: Re: GTX 680 Mining IS Profitable
Post by: 420 on July 31, 2012, 12:25:15 AM
Nope bitcoin mining needs good integer performance and that is something no nvidia device has. Drivers and software can't fix that.

Actually I estimated here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=73627.0) that the GTX 680 should be theoretically capable of 300-475 Mhash/s (it still sucks compared to AMD GPUs though).

okay, how to get that? :)

TDP says 62% load 98->99%
118->120.5mhash

with youtube playing, gpu to 1280mhz memory only boosted 52mhz dont think that matters for hasing

No, memory clock does nothing for mining. In fact, underclock the memory to slightly decrease heat output and reduce temperatures. Put it at like 700-900 mhz when mining for extended times.

with 5970 I found that memory as 1/3 of clock gets significant increase in Mhash rate