Bitcoin Forum

Bitcoin => Development & Technical Discussion => Topic started by: adam3us on March 01, 2015, 12:19:30 PM



Title: ring signature efficiency
Post by: adam3us on March 01, 2015, 12:19:30 PM
The traceable ring signature used in cryptonote https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdf (https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdf) looks like:

KEYGEN: P_i=x_i*G, I_i=x_i*H(P_i)

SIGN: as signer j; random s_i, w_i

(I relabeled q_i as s_i to be more standard, and relabeled the signer s as signer j)

IF i=j THEN L_i=s_i*G ELSE L_i=s_i*G+w_i*P_i
IF i=j THEN R_i=s_i*H(P_i) ELSE R_i=s_i*H(P_i)+w_i*I_j

c=h(m,L_1,...,L_n,R_1,...,R_n)

IF i=j THEN c_i=c-sum_{i!=j}(c_i) ELSE c_i=w_i
IF i=j THEN r_i=w_i-c_i*x_i ELSE r_i=w_i

\sigma = (m,I_j,c_1,...,c_n,r_1,...,r_n)

VERIFY:

L_i'=r_i*G+c_i*P_i
R_i'=r_i*H(P_i)+c_i*I_j
sum_{1..n}( c_j ) =? h(m,L_1',...,L_n',R_1',...,R_n')

LINK: reject duplicate I_j values.

where H(.) is a hash2curve function (taking a value in Zn and deterministically mapping it to a curve point), and h(.) is a hash function with a hash output size very close to n the order of the curve, ie h(.)=SHA256(.) mod n.

Towards finding a more compact ring signature I'd been trying to find a way to make c_i into a CPRNG generated sequence as they are basically arbitrary, though they must be bound to the rest of the signature (non-malleable) so that you can compute at most n-1 existential signature forgeries without knowing any private keys.  

I found this paper "1-out-of-n Signatures from a Variety of Keys" by Abe, Ohkubo and Suzuki http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.363.3431&rep=rep1&type=pdf (http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.363.3431&rep=rep1&type=pdf) section 5.1 shows a way to do it.  I show here how to add traceability to it in a way that makes it compatible with crypto note:

KEYGEN: P_i=x_i*G, I_i=x_i*H(P_i)

SIGN: as signer j; \alpha = random, \forall_{i!=j} s_i = random

c_{j+1} = h(P_1,...,P_n,\alpha*G,\alpha*H(P_j))
c_{j+2} = h(P_1,...,P_n,s_{j+1}*G+c_{j+1}*P_{j+1},s_{j+1}*H(P_{j+1})+c_{j+1}*I_j)
...
c_j = h(P_1,...,P_n,s_{j-1}*G+c_{j-1}*P_{j-1},s_{j-1}*H(P_{j-1})+c_{j-1}*I_j)

so that defines c_1,...,c_n with j values taken mod l some number of signers.  Next find the s_j value:

Now \alpha*G = s_j*G+c_j*P_j so \alpha = s_j+c_j*x_j so s_j = \alpha - c_j*x_j mod n.

Similarly \alpha*H(P_j) = s_j*H(P_j)+c_j*I_j so \alpha works there too.

\sigma = (m,I_j,c_1,s_1,...,s_n)

VERIFY:

\forall_{i=1..n} compute e_i=s_i*G+c_i*P_i and E_i=s_i*H(P_i)+c_i*I_j and c_{i+1}=h(P_1,...,P_n,e_i,E_i)

check c_{n+1}=c_1

LINK: reject duplicate I_j values.

This alternate linkable ring signature tends to 1/2 the size of the crypto note ring signature as the signature is 3+n values vs 2+2n values.

Adam


Title: Re: ring signature efficiency
Post by: waxwing on March 01, 2015, 09:21:29 PM
http://www.texpaste.com/ is an easy way to throw out some TeX; maybe mods would consider implementing formatting for it?


Title: Re: ring signature efficiency
Post by: sickpig on March 02, 2015, 09:26:47 AM
http://www.texpaste.com/ is an easy way to throw out some TeX; maybe mods would consider implementing formatting for it?

it would be useful imho, look at Adam post "translated":

http://www.texpaste.com/n/xaypn9ni

fancy, isn't it?

Anyway I think that cryptonote based coins devs would find Adams's finding useful.



Title: Re: ring signature efficiency
Post by: adam3us on March 21, 2015, 03:29:14 PM
I found this paper "1-out-of-n Signatures from a Variety of Keys" by Abe, Ohkubo and Suzuki http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.363.3431&rep=rep1&type=pdf (http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.363.3431&rep=rep1&type=pdf) section 5.1 shows a way to do it.  I show here how to add traceability to it in a way that makes it compatible with crypto note:

KEYGEN: P_i=x_i*G, I_i=x_i*H(P_i)

SIGN: as signer j; \alpha = random, \forall_{i!=j} s_i = random

c_{j+1} = h(P_1,...,P_n,\alpha*G,\alpha*H(P_j))
c_{j+2} = h(P_1,...,P_n,s_{j+1}*G+c_{j+1}*P_{j+1},s_{j+1}*H(P_{j+1})+c_{j+1}*I_j)
...
c_j = h(P_1,...,P_n,s_{j-1}*G+c_{j-1}*P_{j-1},s_{j-1}*H(P_{j-1})+c_{j-1}*I_j)

so that defines c_1,...,c_n with j values taken mod l some number of signers.  Next find the s_j value:

Now \alpha*G = s_j*G+c_j*P_j so \alpha = s_j+c_j*x_j so s_j = \alpha - c_j*x_j mod n.

Similarly \alpha*H(P_j) = s_j*H(P_j)+c_j*I_j so \alpha works there too.

\sigma = (m,I_j,c_1,s_1,...,s_n)

VERIFY:

\forall_{i=1..n} compute e_i=s_i*G+c_i*P_i and E_i=s_i*H(P_i)+c_i*I_j and c_{i+1}=h(P_1,...,P_n,e_i,E_i)

check c_{n+1}=c_1

LINK: reject duplicate I_j values.

It looks like Joseph Liu, Victor Wei and Duncan Wong made the same observation in "Linkable Spontaneous Anonymous Group
Signature for Ad Hoc Groups" 2004 https://eprint.iacr.org/2004/027.pdf

The proposed scheme is basically the same as what I propose above, and the Liu, Wei & Wong 2004 publication seems to predate the 2007 Fujisaki & Suzuki "Traceable ring signature" https://eprint.iacr.org/2006/389.pdf cited by cryptonote.

Adam


Title: Re: ring signature efficiency
Post by: marcus_of_augustus on March 23, 2015, 11:38:20 PM
Thanks for posting Adam, that looks like some useful milestones.


Title: Re: ring signature efficiency
Post by: np on March 26, 2015, 08:26:01 AM
It looks like Joseph Liu, Victor Wei and Duncan Wong made the same observation in "Linkable Spontaneous Anonymous Group
Signature for Ad Hoc Groups" 2004 https://eprint.iacr.org/2004/027.pdf

The proposed scheme is basically the same as what I propose above, and the Liu, Wei & Wong 2004 publication seems to predate the 2007 Fujisaki & Suzuki "Traceable ring signature" https://eprint.iacr.org/2006/389.pdf cited by cryptonote.

For his master project/thesis, Jesper Borgstrup (https://jesper.borgstrup.dk/about/) worked on integrating ring-signatures to bitmessage to support a decentralized and trustless e-voting system. The thesis is titled "Private, trustless and decentralized message consensus and voting schemes" (https://jesper.borgstrup.dk/2015/01/masters-thesis-private-trustless-decentralized-message-consensus-voting-schemes/) and can be of interest.

In particular he based his work on the 2004 paper you mentioned by Liu, Wei & Wong. He translated it to elliptic curves and implemented in Python to integrate it in PyBitmessage.

We discovered cryptonote later on and were actually surprised to see that they based their work on "traceable ring signature" to make it linkable without mentioning this prior work.

-- NP


Title: Re: ring signature efficiency
Post by: smoothie on November 28, 2015, 06:23:46 AM
This thread was referenced in the followig Ring Confidential Transactions pdf paper by Shen Noether.

https://github.com/ShenNoether/MiniNero/raw/master/RingCT0.5_copy.pdf

The 1/2 size reduction is referenced in the first few pages.

Good stuff.

Thanks Adam!  :)


Title: Re: ring signature efficiency
Post by: virtualx on November 28, 2015, 12:53:32 PM
Thanks Adam!

http://www.texpaste.com/ is an easy way to throw out some TeX; maybe mods would consider implementing formatting for it?

Tex support would make it lots easier to read. I found this mod for TeX support http://custom.simplemachines.org/mods/index.php?mod=1111 (http://custom.simplemachines.org/mods/index.php?mod=1111). I didn't check the code so I'm not sure if it's secure.


Title: Re: ring signature efficiency
Post by: jinumm on November 30, 2015, 06:43:10 AM
thanks adam, i recently use texpaste its good for us, thanks alote