Bitcoin Forum

moderator note: split from https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=877765.2300

---

You guys are not honest, you are not playing fair

You are banning people just because you dont want to pay

My brothers account is just been temporarily banned for spam! My brothers account is RD965

I INVITE ANY MOD TO REVIEW HIS POSTS AND THEY WILL SEE THEY ARE CONSTRUCTIVE

He is been enrolled in many signature campaigns, and he is very active in the forum, and he is never been banned because there is no reason to

If you guys dont want to pay dont offer the service, but this is not fair

Please people be aware who your dealing with, this is not HONEST

Wait. Are you talking about forum ban? Or campaign denied his payment? I am confused here. If he was banned by forum mod, signature campaign has nothing to do with it. As you can see even manager of this signature campaign Marco is currently banned by the mods. Nobody is safe from the banhammer.

is he banned from the sig or just in the forum?

Please read...

Just because someone runs a signature campaign and pays a lot of people does not mean that they are exempt from the rules of the forum.

---

Looking at RD965's recent posts, I see a lot of two line posts (a few three line, but a good number of one line posts as well). The overall gist of the posts are that they are spammy. He is wearing a paid signature advertisement.

I would say that the ban is valid assuming it is for insubstantial posts + paid signature ad

Yesterday we have discused about him in this thread : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=980030.0.  As I said yesterday, it seems he is posting only to try to boost his post count more faster than others. When you are doing this your quality post will go down.

This has nothing to do with the campaign not wanting to pay or the forum staff not wanting them to pay out. It's about trying to curb spam and pointless posts. As mentioned by redsnow that account was brought up for discussion recently for not reading the thread he posted in and answering a question that had already been sufficiently answered. I suggest your "brother" take the warning and wait the ban out and put more effort into posting on his return and this includes reading the previous replies before replying himself.

I still don't fully get the situation since the OP hasn't clarified clearly in the OP.

So, did the bit-x campaign banned him from earning or the bitcointalk forum banned him from posting?

I have this feeling that it is probably the forum which banned him from posting, if that's the case you shouldn't complain about the campaign, since it is not the campaign's decision to ban you. Also there's lots of people in the past who has successfully received multiple payments from the bit-x campaign, so I don't think they're cheating in any ways here.

The forum but bit-x may likely refuse payment now as it is in their terms if you get banned you forfeit it.

I got banned by the forum, just the day I had to get paid for the campaign (curious for me, not saying anything) (of course I didnt get paid)

The only thing I did badly was answer 1 question that was already answered

You didnt "discuss" about me, because you have nothing to discuss

The post itself is made by a user to ask if the fact that one answers the same question a different way its valid or not

That does not mean anything, I never posted to try to boost my post count

Also you have been escrowing other campaigns I have been in and I have never been accused of unsubstantial posts

In fact in the campaign you managed I was the "BEST PERFORMER", and I have a message from ActionCrypto confirming that

You dont have any reason to talk badly about me, besides boosting your own post count  ;)

I am not the mod, and of course I am not who banned you. Maybe the staff has decided that your posts are "insubstantial" , I did not make the rules.

Thanks for the attention, and sorry for my previous post (I didn't want to be arrogant).