|
Title: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on March 20, 2015, 08:37:57 PM This thread will be used to discuss campaign changes arriving in the near future.
What changes would you like to see? Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on March 20, 2015, 08:38:42 PM Reserved.
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Monnt on March 20, 2015, 09:11:47 PM Would definitely like to see some raise in the rates.
Also maybe payout daily? But please leave the payout frequency to at least once a week. Unfortunately I'm still a member, so maybe add a position for members? Also maybe not pay directly to someone's bit-x address because if bit-x shuts down the participants will not be able to withdraw their money. Thanks for creating this thread, Marco! Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: NUFCrichard on March 20, 2015, 10:18:49 PM This thread will be used to discuss campaign changes arriving in the near future. I don't really see any big issues at the moment. What changes would you like to see? I would say that capping the number of qualifying posts per week and re-raising the payout per post might give more bang for your buck, you could waive the post limit for the 1-2 posters who post far more than 100 times a week but keep the quality up, you know who they are already. The bot seems to be working well. Maybe it would be good for bit-x if they offered a bonus percentage when the signature campaign balance is used to trade on their site, that would encourage people to actually use them as well as advertise for them. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: alani123 on March 20, 2015, 10:23:13 PM Changes? You're managing the most epic campaign in the history of this forum. Keep it that way! ;D
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: TriggerX on March 20, 2015, 11:17:44 PM I won't mind if you lower the rates if you can do automatic withdrawals. That would be pretty cool considering I can withdraw any time I want. You should include a high fee for doing this because it's tedious work to do.
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: alani123 on March 21, 2015, 01:40:13 AM I won't mind if you lower the rates if you can do automatic withdrawals. That would be pretty cool considering I can withdraw any time I want. You should include a high fee for doing this because it's tedious work to do. Well since posters also go through manual checking, I don't think this would be easy. Doing this once a month definitely sounds easier for the person that manages the campaign. Withdrawing at any time could be exploitable if it didn't involve any manual checking. If it did however, it would be very tiresome as you pointed out. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: ajw7989 on March 21, 2015, 02:19:52 AM The only thing I do not like and would love if it could be considered would be allowing posts in altcoins to count. I feel there is some great discussion which occurs there. If you are worried about abuse maybe cap it at 10 posts in that section a week.
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: worhiper_-_ on March 21, 2015, 02:26:25 AM The only thing I do not like and would love if it could be considered would be allowing posts in altcoins to count. I feel there is some great discussion which occurs there. If you are worried about abuse maybe cap it at 10 posts in that section a week. Litecoin is also an altcoin, I think that it would be wise for macro to enable the board in it's entirety since altcoins are part of BIT-X's business. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: innocent93 on March 21, 2015, 03:32:54 AM Highest rate again,
but we need a posts count limit to reduce the spam on the forum. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: irfan_pak10 on March 21, 2015, 07:35:12 AM I want Higher Pay per post If its possible
And also monthly Payment. I dont like weakly payment these are tiresome. + Start a bonus system Thanks Marco for this awesome campaign Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on March 21, 2015, 09:15:14 AM I am considering making it monthly again for a few reasons:
- BIT-X gets a full month of advertising instead of a week (if a user changes their signature after only a week, all posts in that week become useless to BIT-X, a month gives more time for those posts to be seen) - Bonuses will come back into play - All members will be entitled to a special gift ;) - No limits and higher rates since I can manage enrolees much better. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: irfan_pak10 on March 21, 2015, 09:23:23 AM I am considering making it monthly again for a few reasons: - BIT-X gets a full month of advertising instead of a week (if a user changes their signature after only a week, all posts in that week become useless to BIT-X, a month gives more time for those posts to be seen) - Bonuses will come back into play - All members will be entitled to a special gift ;) - No limits and higher rates since I can manage enrolees much better. Now For me its More Awesome. I really Liked your these changes. Its a GOOD move. For these reasons 1. Monthly payment 2. Bonus System 3. Higher rates ;) Thanks Dear Edit: When you are going to make these changes? Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on March 21, 2015, 09:26:32 AM I am considering making it monthly again for a few reasons: - BIT-X gets a full month of advertising instead of a week (if a user changes their signature after only a week, all posts in that week become useless to BIT-X, a month gives more time for those posts to be seen) - Bonuses will come back into play - All members will be entitled to a special gift ;) - No limits and higher rates since I can manage enrolees much better. Now For me its More Awesome. I really Liked your these changes. Its a GOOD move. For these reasons 1. Monthly payment 2. Bonus System 3. Higher rates ;) Thanks Dear Edit: When you are going to make these changes? Not sure if I'll make these changes but if I do it will be within a couple of week max. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: innocent93 on March 21, 2015, 09:33:58 AM I am considering making it monthly again for a few reasons: - BIT-X gets a full month of advertising instead of a week (if a user changes their signature after only a week, all posts in that week become useless to BIT-X, a month gives more time for those posts to be seen) - Bonuses will come back into play - All members will be entitled to a special gift ;) - No limits and higher rates since I can manage enrolees much better. Now For me its More Awesome. I really Liked your these changes. Its a GOOD move. For these reasons 1. Monthly payment 2. Bonus System 3. Higher rates ;) Thanks Dear Edit: When you are going to make these changes? Not sure if I'll make these changes but if I do it will be within a couple of week max. So make the monthly payout first, I believe that will make the campaign more stable and cut down the spam. Some are speeding up posting to earn quick money due to a week-payout. :) Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: thebitcoinquiz.com on March 21, 2015, 10:17:51 AM I am considering making it monthly again for a few reasons: Now I have started to like the monthly payment. Its better to get monthly bitcoins rather than getting dust each week.- BIT-X gets a full month of advertising instead of a week (if a user changes their signature after only a week, all posts in that week become useless to BIT-X, a month gives more time for those posts to be seen) - Bonuses will come back into play - All members will be entitled to a special gift ;) - No limits and higher rates since I can manage enrolees much better. I support the monthly payment now. Looking forward for Marco to implement these changes soon. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: abyrnes81 on March 21, 2015, 10:21:36 AM I am considering making it monthly again for a few reasons: Now I have started to like the monthly payment. Its better to get monthly bitcoins rather than getting dust each week.- BIT-X gets a full month of advertising instead of a week (if a user changes their signature after only a week, all posts in that week become useless to BIT-X, a month gives more time for those posts to be seen) - Bonuses will come back into play - All members will be entitled to a special gift ;) - No limits and higher rates since I can manage enrolees much better. I support the monthly payment now. Looking forward for Marco to implement these changes soon. I support the weekly payment, if it will be a monthly payment the payRates should be more high than now (I know there are a lot of users change signature campaign every week, for these users you can pay the -30% and if they will stay for two week you can give them back +30%). Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: hilariousandco on March 21, 2015, 11:50:27 AM I'm not sure if making it unlimited is a good idea. I also think you should check a users post history after they sign up and before you accept them into the campaign and deny anyone with short or spammy posts. This should hopefully cut down about half of the spam but you should also try keep an eye on the rest by checking periodically. You should also encourage users to report posters to you directly like stinglewood does.
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: irfan_pak10 on March 21, 2015, 12:30:13 PM I'm not sure if making it unlimited is a good idea. I also think you should check a users post history after they sign up and before you accept them into the campaign and deny anyone with short or spammy posts. This should hopefully cut down about half of the spam but you should also try keep an eye on the rest by checking periodically. You should also encourage users to report posters to you directly like stinglewood does. I think this is really a nice Idea, Create a thread in "Games and rounds" that Those Who will report a Spamy post of those member who are wearning Bit-x Sig will receive BTC for doing that. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: pawel7777 on March 21, 2015, 12:57:01 PM I think this is really a nice Idea, Create a thread in "Games and rounds" that Those Who will report a Spamy post of those member who are wearning Bit-x Sig will receive BTC for doing that. Nah, this way every signature wearer will be reported. Simple logic: report everyone and maybe you'll get paid for 1 or 2 of them. ...You should also encourage users to report posters to you directly like stinglewood does. Isn't it better for everyone to report spammers directly to mods (using 'report to moderator' button)? Seems more effective and simple. If you're a spammer and you're banned from campaign, you could just enroll to other one. But if you're banned from forum for 2 weeks, then you not only don't get paid for current period, but you're also losing potential earnings for the next 2 weeks. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: ajw7989 on March 21, 2015, 02:05:04 PM I dont mind weekly or monthly payments because I stick with campaign signatures for the longest. I would love the bonuses though but maybe give bonuses for hitting milestones such as 100 posts etc.
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: damiano on March 21, 2015, 06:02:44 PM I would prefer weekly, but I can understand the move to a monthly payment. Most people don't hop sig campaigns and it's rare we do find one as well run as this one. The rates are the best out of all the campaign's and I do like the bot your using. Personally it's more of a pain to leave and hop into something else.
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Joca97 on March 21, 2015, 07:01:49 PM is there any chance that the payouts can be daily
because the bot is already automatic every week also will pay per post increase? Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: TriggerX on March 21, 2015, 07:28:29 PM I rather you lower the rates than make the payouts monthly. I personally think monthly payouts take too long and I have to wait 30 days for it. The only reason I'm on bit-x campaign is because of the weekly campaign, and the automated bot which can instantly check your stats. You should do a poll to see which one people like better.
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: abyrnes81 on March 21, 2015, 07:28:43 PM is there any chance that the payouts can be daily It will be really 'annoying' and not useful to all the enrolled users (due the high fees). If marco wants, he can send a daily payment at 23.59 of each day with a single transaction (multiple outputs).because the bot is already automatic every week also will pay per post increase? He said the payrates will increase by the end of this month. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: nioc on March 21, 2015, 07:47:33 PM I rather you lower the rates than make the payouts monthly. I personally think monthly payouts take too long and I have to wait 30 days for it. The only reason I'm on bit-x campaign is because of the weekly campaign, and the automated bot which can instantly check your stats. You should do a poll to see which one people like better. I just bought 8 jars of peanut butter on 1/2 price sale! so it's now ok to change it to monthly payments. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: alani123 on March 21, 2015, 07:50:41 PM I'd also prefer monthly payouts with more confident payments. Not exploitable, less tiring for the campaign manager and better advertising afterall.
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: pawel7777 on March 21, 2015, 09:13:00 PM Honestly, I can't understand why would any participant prefer monthly payments.
It's always better to have access to your funds sooner than later. If you don't like weekly payments then... just don't withdraw weekly, let the funds cumulate on your bit-x account for a month (or longer). I do understand marco's and bit-x point of view: Quote - BIT-X gets a full month of advertising instead of a week (if a user changes their signature after only a week, all posts in that week become useless to BIT-X, a month gives more time for those posts to be seen) Fair enough. If it comes with increased payments, I can live with that. Generally I think campaign is working pretty fine. I would reconsider reopening some of the boards. For example, I'd allow local boards, but with set limit of posts in such boards (say no more than 10-20/month). Rather than disqualifying all altcoin boards, I'd allow "Marketplace (Altcoins)" and possibly "Altcoin Discussion" as these could be valuable for bit-x (who also accept 1 altcoin - Litecoin). Or maybe just disallow "Announcements (Altcoins)" as it's most spammy. Or, as above, just set a limit of posts in those boards per month? Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: nioc on March 21, 2015, 09:32:16 PM Honestly, I can't understand why would any participant prefer monthly payments. It's always better to have access to your funds sooner than later. If you don't like weekly payments then... just don't withdraw weekly, let the funds cumulate on your bit-x account for a month (or longer). I do understand marco's and bit-x point of view: Quote - BIT-X gets a full month of advertising instead of a week (if a user changes their signature after only a week, all posts in that week become useless to BIT-X, a month gives more time for those posts to be seen) Fair enough. If it comes with increased payments, I can live with that. Generally I think campaign is working pretty fine. I would reconsider reopening some of the boards. For example, I'd allow local boards, but with set limit of posts in such boards (say no more than 10-20/month). Rather than disqualifying all altcoin boards, I'd allow "Marketplace (Altcoins)" and possibly "Altcoin Discussion" as these could be valuable for bit-x (who also accept 1 altcoin - Litecoin). Or maybe just disallow "Announcements (Altcoins)" as it's most spammy. Or, as above, just set a limit of posts in those boards per month? I am involved in 2 altcoins and my posts in their announcement sections are probably the least spammy of my posts. I understand the dilemma but I'm just giving my perspective. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: leonaa on March 21, 2015, 10:31:55 PM any chance to see roll overs, as long the post is quality? so it motivates only for premium posts.
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: ScryptAsic on March 22, 2015, 06:03:22 AM I like the idea of the monthly payments - I do not post that much so it is better for me personally. I would like to see the paid per post maybe dropped in favor of 50 posts per month for whatever rate. I think you need to keep an eye on the spammers that have joined. I have seen a lot of bans recently and many seem to be from Bit-X signature campaign. The campaign over all is the best I have ever joined with the bot and all so not much to change.
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: hilariousandco on March 22, 2015, 07:23:01 AM I rather you lower the rates than make the payouts monthly. I personally think monthly payouts take too long and I have to wait 30 days for it. The only reason I'm on bit-x campaign is because of the weekly campaign, and the automated bot which can instantly check your stats. You should do a poll to see which one people like better. You could join bitmixer if bit-x changes to monthly. any chance to see roll overs, as long the post is quality? so it motivates only for premium posts. Roll over of what? There is no minimum post requirements so there's nothing to roll over. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Amph on March 22, 2015, 09:44:40 AM i actually like more the weekly payment, but whatever... if the rate go up it will be good anyway
i did miss the gift at the end of the month, that was a nice addition, i hope it come back another thing, is...i would like to see some other boards "activated", too much restriction right now, board like altcoin discussion is good, and there are plenty of newbies there asking question about mining, even if it isn't bitcoin related Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: alani123 on March 22, 2015, 12:53:17 PM i actually like more the weekly payment, but whatever... if the rate go up it will be good anyway i did miss the gift at the end of the month, that was a nice addition, i hope it come back another thing, is...i would like to see some other boards "activated", too much restriction right now, board like altcoin discussion is good, and there are plenty of newbies there asking question about mining, even if it isn't bitcoin related Well yeah... Answering those questions is like a service to the community. ;D Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Joca97 on March 23, 2015, 07:09:16 PM is there any chance that the payouts can be daily It will be really 'annoying' and not useful to all the enrolled users (due the high fees). If marco wants, he can send a daily payment at 23.59 of each day with a single transaction (multiple outputs).because the bot is already automatic every week also will pay per post increase? He said the payrates will increase by the end of this month. okey thats good but there are couple of advantages and disadvatages of daily and weekly still dont know what i want,but its better weekly then monthly payments also im hoping by the end of month marco increases the payouts this is too little :/ Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on March 23, 2015, 07:12:55 PM is there any chance that the payouts can be daily It will be really 'annoying' and not useful to all the enrolled users (due the high fees). If marco wants, he can send a daily payment at 23.59 of each day with a single transaction (multiple outputs).because the bot is already automatic every week also will pay per post increase? He said the payrates will increase by the end of this month. okey thats good but there are couple of advantages and disadvatages of daily and weekly still dont know what i want,but its better weekly then monthly payments also im hoping by the end of month marco increases the payouts this is too little :/ Too little?! :P These are amazing rates for posting on a forum. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: megamore on March 24, 2015, 03:19:31 AM Is there a feature to see how many posts that have been made and how many BTC received?
I only saw bit-x bot only displays the total this week and after receiving payment bot will return to zero Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: NUFCrichard on March 24, 2015, 12:56:46 PM Is there a feature to see how many posts that have been made and how many BTC received? I only saw bit-x bot only displays the total this week and after receiving payment bot will return to zero Check your bit-x account/bitcointalk PMs and you will see how much has been deposited into your account each week. Divide that by your rate per post and you will see how many of your posts were counted from the last week. If you really want to see how many posts were excluded, then you would have to count how many posts you made in the timeframe in your profile, then subtract the number you worked out before, that would be your excluded post count! I would rather just trust the system and receive what I receive, the above seems like quite a lot of work for no return! Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: innocent93 on March 24, 2015, 02:18:46 PM Also, I don't think the hoppers who always leave and join another higher paying campaign deserved the right to compete for the bonus.
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on March 25, 2015, 03:13:13 PM Also, I don't think the hoppers who always leave and join another higher paying campaign deserved the right to compete for the bonus. Absolutely! ;) Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: irfan_pak10 on March 26, 2015, 01:13:01 AM Please try include Local Section and Altcoin board. I dont know why did you excluded the altcoin section as Bit-x is also dealing with altcoins?
Disqualified posts: - Any signature campaign thread. - - Off-topic and - Games & rounds and the investor-based games boards Other wise every thing is going fine. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on March 26, 2015, 06:47:33 AM Please try include Local Section and Altcoin board. I dont know why did you excluded the altcoin section as Bit-x is also dealing with altcoins? Disqualified posts: - Any signature campaign thread. - - Off-topic and - Games & rounds and the investor-based games boards Other wise every thing is going fine. The exchange deals with one altcoin (I could allow that thread only). If I allow local posts, the Indonesian board will be excluded probably. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on March 26, 2015, 04:06:01 PM Would people be interested in USD pegged payments?
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: NUFCrichard on March 26, 2015, 06:39:28 PM Would people be interested in USD pegged payments? Well I wouldn't want that at all, but I'd hope they won't reduce the rates as soon as bitcoin's price rises and I won't complain that they need to raise the rate when bitcoin falls! Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: irfan_pak10 on March 26, 2015, 06:42:54 PM Would people be interested in USD pegged payments? By the way what is this? Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on March 26, 2015, 07:20:37 PM Would people be interested in USD pegged payments? By the way what is this? Payment rates in term of USD not BTC. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: nioc on March 26, 2015, 11:11:09 PM Would people be interested in USD pegged payments? btc please Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: irfan_pak10 on March 26, 2015, 11:54:09 PM Would people be interested in USD pegged payments? I dont think that some one would be interested in getting a fixed amount, atleast im not ;D Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: waterpile on March 27, 2015, 05:13:59 AM Would people be interested in USD pegged payments? i can deal with that :) Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Minerjoe on March 27, 2015, 06:10:07 AM Everything s fine besides the fact altcoins are excluded. I understand the exchange deal with only one altcoin but 100% people who are in altocoins are also in BTC.
I have not found a single person who holds alts and not BTC at the same time. So it is targeted audience. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Brewins on March 27, 2015, 08:40:02 PM Would people be interested in USD pegged payments? Well I wouldn't want that at all, but I'd hope they won't reduce the rates as soon as bitcoin's price rises and I won't complain that they need to raise the rate when bitcoin falls! I see people day after day saying bitcoin will die in certain sections of the forum, so I guess some people would be interested. But I see some dispute related to the USD rate, specially is payment happens during big moves Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: pawel7777 on March 27, 2015, 09:11:04 PM Would people be interested in USD pegged payments? By the way what is this? Payment rates in term of USD not BTC. Confused here. You mean payments straight in USD, or 'USD pegged' meaning the rate is expressed in USD/post but paid in BTC at the current rate on the pay-day? In other words, protection from rate fluctuation (amount of BTC/post is not fixed, but its value in USD terms is). Anyhow, I (strongly) prefer bitcoin. You could do it as an optional alternative, everyone would have to declare whether they want USD or BTC. But I reckon it would be too much hustle. Also, I'm guessing, that if the payments are in USD, you'd need fully verified bit-x account? Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: abyrnes81 on March 27, 2015, 09:44:33 PM Would people be interested in USD pegged payments? By the way what is this? Payment rates in term of USD not BTC. Confused here. You mean payments straight in USD, or 'USD pegged' meaning the rate is expressed in USD/post but paid in BTC at the current rate on the pay-day? In other words, protection from rate fluctuation (amount of BTC/post is not fixed, but its value in USD terms is). Anyhow, I (strongly) prefer bitcoin. You could do it as an optional alternative, everyone would have to declare whether they want USD or BTC. But I reckon it would be too much hustle. Also, I'm guessing, that if the payments are in USD, you'd need fully verified bit-x account? I think the rate btc for the payments is the best thing, we are at bitcointalk.org not dollartalk.org :). Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Amph on March 28, 2015, 08:13:14 AM Would people be interested in USD pegged payments? i prefer euro to be honest, but it would be a nice addition anyway usd/euro/gbp, i don't really care about other fiat Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on March 28, 2015, 08:25:01 AM Would people be interested in USD pegged payments? i prefer euro to be honest, but it would be a nice addition anyway usd/euro/gbp, i don't really care about other fiat You'd want to be paid in Euro or have BTC payments based on Euro/post? Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Bitcoin Explorer on March 28, 2015, 09:20:23 AM Would people be interested in USD pegged payments? By the way what is this? Payment rates in term of USD not BTC. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Minerjoe on March 28, 2015, 10:48:44 AM I dont think monthly payments is a good idea. People do need to have some kind of incentive to continue promoting the service and waiting for a month to get paid can be very long time.
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Joca97 on March 28, 2015, 11:16:13 AM Would people be interested in USD pegged payments? i prefer euro to be honest, but it would be a nice addition anyway usd/euro/gbp, i don't really care about other fiat You'd want to be paid in Euro or have BTC payments based on Euro/post? where can we cashout then euros?to what cards(skrill...) and how much would it be per post? Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Amph on March 28, 2015, 11:28:35 AM Would people be interested in USD pegged payments? i prefer euro to be honest, but it would be a nice addition anyway usd/euro/gbp, i don't really care about other fiat You'd want to be paid in Euro or have BTC payments based on Euro/post? no no i always prefer btc, just btc payments based on those tree currencies with euro as a personal preference Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: BadBear on March 28, 2015, 12:38:11 PM When someone says USD pegged they usually mean the payments will be priced in dollars, paid in btc, e.g. 23 cents a post, paid in bitcoin using exchange rate at the time of payment.
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: redsn0w on March 28, 2015, 12:44:10 PM Would people be interested in USD pegged payments? i prefer euro to be honest, but it would be a nice addition anyway usd/euro/gbp, i don't really care about other fiat You'd want to be paid in Euro or have BTC payments based on Euro/post? no no i always prefer btc, just btc payments based on those tree currencies with euro as a personal preference No, if I can say my opinion I don't want the rate usd/euro * post. I prefer the normal rate btc*post and maybe if marcotheminer can raise (a little bit) the various rates (for all the forum ranks) due the various "fluctuation of the price". For example :
Thanks for the attention. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: coinpr0n on March 28, 2015, 12:46:56 PM Would people be interested in USD pegged payments? Not really. I personally like doing the maths in BTC and having the BTC amount fixed rather than the USD value (whoever wants to trade/profit can do that at their leisure). About the monthly payments I'm fine either way, leaning a little towards weekly payments as it is now - but fine either way. Finally, my only real desired change to see on the Bit-X campaign is Local board (specifically for me the Spanish one). Keep up the great work! Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: erikalui on March 28, 2015, 12:58:38 PM Would people be interested in USD pegged payments? Means the bitcoins I have earned will be converted to USD and stores in my Bit-x wallet? I would prefer this method as the BTC rate is fluctuating a lot and if I get a fixed price in USD, it would be great. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on March 28, 2015, 01:03:22 PM When someone says USD pegged they usually mean the payments will be priced in dollars, paid in btc, e.g. 23 cents a post, paid in bitcoin using exchange rate at the time of payment. This is what I meant. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: --Encrypted-- on March 28, 2015, 01:03:45 PM I think it's better to stay on the weekly payout, USD pegged might be good, but not a must. and I want to get paid to my real address, if possible.
I also prefer that the local post to be counted, but I just happened to be Indonesian :( are we that bad? :'( Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: funtotry on March 28, 2015, 01:35:37 PM USD pegged might be good but then the budget would have to be in USD and you can't change the amount of btc that is in the wallet every times the exchange rate changes. Its a good idea for it to usd fixed but then you might make or lose money based on the price starting at the price ending, wouldn't it be bad if the price skyrocketed right before you get paid so you get very small amount of btc?
I think sticking to BTC rates is much better than pegging it to fiat. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: nioc on March 28, 2015, 01:39:45 PM When someone says USD pegged they usually mean the payments will be priced in dollars, paid in btc, e.g. 23 cents a post, paid in bitcoin using exchange rate at the time of payment. This is what I meant. Why, do you think btc is going up ??? ;D ;D Remember 1btc=1btc, HODL 8) Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: unamis76 on March 28, 2015, 01:47:53 PM Please, no USD pegging. That wouldn't be helping the BTC economy... :) Also, it could go both ways, the price could have a major drop and we would recieve a lot of coins, and the price could rise and we'd have nothing. Not a good solution for anyone :)
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: funtotry on March 28, 2015, 01:49:31 PM Please, no USD pegging. That wouldn't be helping the BTC economy... :) Also, it could go both ways, the price could have a major drop and we would recieve a lot of coins, and the price could rise and we'd have nothing. Not a good solution for anyone :) Exactly there would be too much profit swinging between the exchange and us. I want to worry about the price not the exchange, going up and down will affect the payout and make profitability different. Also isn't this the btc forum? We should be focusing on the btc currency, and not peg it to fiat because fiat is what we are up against.Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Lauda on March 28, 2015, 02:19:02 PM I am considering making it monthly again for a few reasons: - BIT-X gets a full month of advertising instead of a week (if a user changes their signature after only a week, all posts in that week become useless to BIT-X, a month gives more time for those posts to be seen) - Bonuses will come back into play - All members will be entitled to a special gift ;) - No limits and higher rates since I can manage enrolees much better. 1) There is nothing wrong with monthly payments. It's much better for BIT-X, and doesn't harm the people who signed up. Actually some people do not like the weekly payouts because some get "dust". 2) Excellent. 3) Even Better. 4) Absolutely no. Even now the spam is quite bad. I could easily see people trying to achieve 1500 posts or more in a month. There are some who are now posting a crazy amount of "unclear" rubbish posts, but I'm not gonna point fingers. Also I'd prefer the rates to stay in Bitcoin. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Wei H on March 28, 2015, 03:50:06 PM When someone says USD pegged they usually mean the payments will be priced in dollars, paid in btc, e.g. 23 cents a post, paid in bitcoin using exchange rate at the time of payment. This is what I meant. Sound great, the Bitcoin price fluctuation won't impact on the posting income. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: nioc on March 28, 2015, 04:59:39 PM When someone says USD pegged they usually mean the payments will be priced in dollars, paid in btc, e.g. 23 cents a post, paid in bitcoin using exchange rate at the time of payment. This is what I meant. Sound great, the Bitcoin price fluctuation won't impact on the posting income. You are not participating in this campaign. :P It will impact the amount of btc one receives in an unknown way. It's all about the btc. I guess for Bit-X it's not all about the btc. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on March 28, 2015, 06:59:47 PM When someone says USD pegged they usually mean the payments will be priced in dollars, paid in btc, e.g. 23 cents a post, paid in bitcoin using exchange rate at the time of payment. This is what I meant. Sound great, the Bitcoin price fluctuation won't impact on the posting income. You are not participating in this campaign. :P It will impact the amount of btc one receives in an unknown way. It's all about the btc. I guess for Bit-X it's not all about the btc. Never said that this would happen, just asking for opinions! Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: redsn0w on March 28, 2015, 07:06:18 PM When someone says USD pegged they usually mean the payments will be priced in dollars, paid in btc, e.g. 23 cents a post, paid in bitcoin using exchange rate at the time of payment. This is what I meant. Sound great, the Bitcoin price fluctuation won't impact on the posting income. You are not participating in this campaign. :P It will impact the amount of btc one receives in an unknown way. It's all about the btc. I guess for Bit-X it's not all about the btc. Maybe he is participating to the bit-x signature campaign from one of his alt account. @marcotheminer, can I ask you what do you think about the payment directly the our personal bitcoin address (instead to the bit-x one?). Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: unamis76 on March 28, 2015, 07:32:53 PM When someone says USD pegged they usually mean the payments will be priced in dollars, paid in btc, e.g. 23 cents a post, paid in bitcoin using exchange rate at the time of payment. This is what I meant. Sound great, the Bitcoin price fluctuation won't impact on the posting income. You are not participating in this campaign. :P It will impact the amount of btc one receives in an unknown way. It's all about the btc. I guess for Bit-X it's not all about the btc. Maybe he is participating to the bit-x signature campaign from one of his alt account. @marcotheminer, can I ask you what do you think about the payment directly the our personal bitcoin address (instead to the bit-x one?). That would be a very welcome change :) But I agree it makes sense to be paid on the Bit-x address. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Superhitech on March 28, 2015, 07:33:22 PM I am considering making it monthly again for a few reasons: - BIT-X gets a full month of advertising instead of a week (if a user changes their signature after only a week, all posts in that week become useless to BIT-X, a month gives more time for those posts to be seen) - Bonuses will come back into play - All members will be entitled to a special gift ;) - No limits and higher rates since I can manage enrolees much better. I would prefer not to have monthly payments. I run a faucet, so I need some BTC every week to fund my faucet. I understand that all posts in that week become useless to BIT-X, if a user changes their signature, but not many people change their signature after only one week, as BIT-X is one of the best signature campaigns, and I don't see what gain there is to constantly jump between signature campaigns. @marcotheminer, can I ask you what do you think about the payment directly the our personal bitcoin address (instead to the bit-x one?). I don't think marco will make payment directly to our bitcoin address, as sending it to the BIT-X account lets users try out BIT-X. I would not have discovered BIT-X if they had paid the bitcoin directly to my wallet. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: aNtiClocK on March 28, 2015, 07:56:20 PM When someone says USD pegged they usually mean the payments will be priced in dollars, paid in btc, e.g. 23 cents a post, paid in bitcoin using exchange rate at the time of payment. This is what I meant. Sound great, the Bitcoin price fluctuation won't impact on the posting income. You are not participating in this campaign. :P It will impact the amount of btc one receives in an unknown way. It's all about the btc. I guess for Bit-X it's not all about the btc. Maybe he is participating to the bit-x signature campaign from one of his alt account. @marcotheminer, can I ask you what do you think about the payment directly the our personal bitcoin address (instead to the bit-x one?). If there master card fees will be lowered than other then i will have no issue if they will send money to bit-x account, when i will join this service Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: alani123 on March 28, 2015, 08:02:59 PM @marcotheminer, can I ask you what do you think about the payment directly the our personal bitcoin address (instead to the bit-x one?). You can do this already. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: erikalui on March 28, 2015, 08:25:21 PM @marcotheminer, can I ask you what do you think about the payment directly the our personal bitcoin address (instead to the bit-x one?). You can do this already. Nope. "2. Add your BIT-X address (with a 3) in the 'Other Contact Info' field here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;sa=forumProfile" You get paid to your Bit-x address and not any other wallet. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: unamis76 on March 28, 2015, 09:31:19 PM @marcotheminer, can I ask you what do you think about the payment directly the our personal bitcoin address (instead to the bit-x one?). You can do this already. What? How? Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: redsn0w on March 28, 2015, 10:14:59 PM @marcotheminer, can I ask you what do you think about the payment directly the our personal bitcoin address (instead to the bit-x one?). You can do this already. No, I can't. In these months I have always received the payment into my bit-x address (only one time I've received it on my personal bitcoin address, in the beginning of the signature campaign). Now the worst thing is the fee, but it will not be a problem if marcotheminer can ask them if can reduce it. PS: Can you ask them? Thanks (or at least add the % of fee on our payment). Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: pawel7777 on March 28, 2015, 10:57:23 PM Now the worst thing is the fee, but it will not be a problem if marcotheminer can ask them if can reduce it. PS: Can you ask them? Thanks (or at least add the % of fee on our payment). I can see how the withdrawal fee could be a problem for high volume traders, but in terms of sig campaign it's not really that scary. For 300 posts/month (most people are below that) fee is little above 1 post-worth. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: waterpile on March 28, 2015, 11:14:09 PM yep, the withdrawal fee is kinda annoying, I don't why they need to deduct a % from the amount..
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: unamis76 on March 28, 2015, 11:52:10 PM Now the worst thing is the fee, but it will not be a problem if marcotheminer can ask them if can reduce it. PS: Can you ask them? Thanks (or at least add the % of fee on our payment). I can see how the withdrawal fee could be a problem for high volume traders, but in terms of sig campaign it's not really that scary. For 300 posts/month (most people are below that) fee is little above 1 post-worth. But if you add all the withdrawals from all the people... Fees go up to a lot of posts :) Maybe them can simply reduce or abolish the fee for addresses registered in the signature campaign... :) Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Superhitech on March 29, 2015, 12:03:09 AM Not sure if this has been suggested before, as I don't want to go through all 5 pages, but I think they should show the last 3 payment dates and payment amounts on the bot interface. It would be useful for reference.
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: aNtiClocK on March 29, 2015, 06:44:08 AM Some I also want to suggest that please do consider member level in your sig campaign, there are a lot of member there who want to join your campaign. I will be very thanfull to you if you will do so.
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Brewins on March 29, 2015, 07:11:35 AM I think add payout history to the bot or at least the next payout date would be interesting.
I always forgot my payout day, and don't save historical data might create disputes in the future Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on March 29, 2015, 07:36:24 AM I think add payout history to the bot or at least the next payout date would be interesting. I always forgot my payout day, and don't save historical data might create disputes in the future You'll get a message come payday :) Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on March 29, 2015, 07:36:49 AM I'll be sure to mention that withdrawal fees should be lowered from 0.5%.
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Amph on March 29, 2015, 07:43:30 AM yep, the withdrawal fee is kinda annoying, I don't why they need to deduct a % from the amount.. the problem is... is still too high, it was 200k before, now 125k or something, why it can't be like any exchange(30k-50k max)? Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on March 29, 2015, 08:19:28 AM yep, the withdrawal fee is kinda annoying, I don't why they need to deduct a % from the amount.. the problem is is still too high, it was 200k before, now 125k or something, why it can't be like any exchange(30k-50k max)? Cryptsy takes 0.001BTC from all withdrawals. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: --Encrypted-- on March 29, 2015, 08:52:40 AM @marcotheminer, can I ask you what do you think about the payment directly the our personal bitcoin address (instead to the bit-x one?). You can do this already. how do I do this? yep, the withdrawal fee is kinda annoying, I don't why they need to deduct a % from the amount.. the problem is is still too high, it was 200k before, now 125k or something, why it can't be like any exchange(30k-50k max)? Cryptsy takes 0.001BTC from all withdrawals. I don't use bit-x a lot so I don't have a problem with the fees, but it might be better if you put a limit to that. 0.005BTC max fee sounds good enough. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on March 29, 2015, 09:46:57 AM As some of may have heard, BIT-X will be releasing a Bitcoin Debit MasterCard shortly, first shipping commencing Monday, March 30.
As part of the first series of giveaways, all members enrolled in the campaign will be entitled to a card without the issuance fee of 0.05BTC. Just to gauge interest, who would be interested? Fees are outlined below: https://i.imgur.com/sdJefkr.png (https://i.imgur.com/sdJefkr.png) https://i.imgur.com/3n263UF.png (https://i.imgur.com/3n263UF.png) Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Amph on March 29, 2015, 11:57:30 AM yep, the withdrawal fee is kinda annoying, I don't why they need to deduct a % from the amount.. the problem is is still too high, it was 200k before, now 125k or something, why it can't be like any exchange(30k-50k max)? Cryptsy takes 0.001BTC from all withdrawals. that's why i don't use it :D though this should not be an excuse to have those high fees Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: nioc on March 29, 2015, 12:57:10 PM yep, the withdrawal fee is kinda annoying, I don't why they need to deduct a % from the amount.. the problem is is still too high, it was 200k before, now 125k or something, why it can't be like any exchange(30k-50k max)? Cryptsy takes 0.001BTC from all withdrawals. I use Poloniex, they take 0.0001 btc :) Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: redsn0w on March 29, 2015, 01:00:23 PM @marcotheminer,
If I can ask you another thing, can you allow (count) again the post made in the local boards ? Maybe you can put a limit of 25-50 posts in those local boards. What do you think? Second thing: Can you add a chat-box on the site www.bitsig.website? Thanks again for the attention. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: nioc on March 29, 2015, 01:01:50 PM As some of may have heard, BIT-X will be releasing a Bitcoin Debit MasterCard shortly, first shipping commencing Monday, March 30. As part of the first series of giveaways, all members enrolled in the campaign will be entitled to a card without the issuance fee of 0.05BTC. Just to gauge interest, who would be interested? Fees are outlined below: https://i.imgur.com/sdJefkr.png (https://i.imgur.com/sdJefkr.png) https://i.imgur.com/3n263UF.png (https://i.imgur.com/3n263UF.png) I have no experience with other debit cards so I have nothing to compare this to. $25 for my name on the card and $12 a month if I don't use it? :P :P No thank you Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Lauda on March 29, 2015, 03:13:24 PM @marcotheminer, 50 would be okay if it was for a month. People would abuse this too much I'm afraid. Even though there are some nice discussions there, the moderation is lower than in some other sections.If I can ask you another thing, can you allow (count) again the post made in the local boards ? Maybe you can put a limit of 25-50 posts in those local boards. What do you think? Second thing: Can you add a chat-box on the site www.bitsig.website? Thanks again for the attention. When are these changes going to be implemented? Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: funtotry on March 29, 2015, 03:19:50 PM @marcotheminer, I disagree. Local boards are MUCH harder to moderate since they are in different languages. Since marco only knows english (I think), the chinese posters could just be writing random things and marco would think its just actual discussion. If there are moderators for different languages then I think it could work, but since the moderators for the campaign are only english it won't work.If I can ask you another thing, can you allow (count) again the post made in the local boards ? Maybe you can put a limit of 25-50 posts in those local boards. What do you think? Second thing: Can you add a chat-box on the site www.bitsig.website? Thanks again for the attention. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on March 29, 2015, 03:34:40 PM @marcotheminer, 50 would be okay if it was for a month. People would abuse this too much I'm afraid. Even though there are some nice discussions there, the moderation is lower than in some other sections.If I can ask you another thing, can you allow (count) again the post made in the local boards ? Maybe you can put a limit of 25-50 posts in those local boards. What do you think? Second thing: Can you add a chat-box on the site www.bitsig.website? Thanks again for the attention. When are these changes going to be implemented? I will make changes in a week or so. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: --Encrypted-- on March 29, 2015, 09:27:52 PM @marcotheminer, 50 would be okay if it was for a month. People would abuse this too much I'm afraid. Even though there are some nice discussions there, the moderation is lower than in some other sections.If I can ask you another thing, can you allow (count) again the post made in the local boards ? Maybe you can put a limit of 25-50 posts in those local boards. What do you think? Second thing: Can you add a chat-box on the site www.bitsig.website? Thanks again for the attention. When are these changes going to be implemented? I will make changes in a week or so. I'm curious, will you exclude the Indonesian board like you said before? I wouldn't prefer that to happen, but decision is decision. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: funtotry on March 30, 2015, 01:53:21 AM I think that rates should be increased for next week unless we see a major price improvement in btc. Btc fell over 10% this week and payouts have stayed the same. unless bit-x has actually chosen to not care about the fiat price as would be respected.
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: waterpile on March 30, 2015, 05:03:46 AM I think that rates should be increased for next week unless we see a major price improvement in btc. Btc fell over 10% this week and payouts have stayed the same. unless bit-x has actually chosen to not care about the fiat price as would be respected. Most chose the btc, not in terms of USD. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: erikalui on March 30, 2015, 10:50:18 AM @marcotheminer, 50 would be okay if it was for a month. People would abuse this too much I'm afraid. Even though there are some nice discussions there, the moderation is lower than in some other sections.If I can ask you another thing, can you allow (count) again the post made in the local boards ? Maybe you can put a limit of 25-50 posts in those local boards. What do you think? Second thing: Can you add a chat-box on the site www.bitsig.website? Thanks again for the attention. When are these changes going to be implemented? I will make changes in a week or so. Especially the Market Place as it deals with bitcoin trades. Indian Marketplace section for eg. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on March 30, 2015, 11:57:24 AM I think that rates should be increased for next week unless we see a major price improvement in btc. Btc fell over 10% this week and payouts have stayed the same. unless bit-x has actually chosen to not care about the fiat price as would be respected. BIT-X deals in terms of BTC for the signature campaign. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Bit_Happy on March 30, 2015, 11:29:16 PM How does a transition work:
Will we still get out current weekly payment right before a monthly change starts? Also, have you thought about every two weeks, instead of a whole month? Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: NUFCrichard on March 31, 2015, 06:29:05 AM I think that rates should be increased for next week unless we see a major price improvement in btc. Btc fell over 10% this week and payouts have stayed the same. unless bit-x has actually chosen to not care about the fiat price as would be respected. BIT-X deals in terms of BTC for the signature campaign. I think that is a good thing, but I hope they stick to it if the price goes up.. Is everything ok regarding the campaign and your trust Marco? I have had no problems and everything seems to be running well, but having a big negative trust doesn't look good for BitX or the campaign, will it make a difference? Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: redsn0w on March 31, 2015, 08:47:41 AM I think that rates should be increased for next week unless we see a major price improvement in btc. Btc fell over 10% this week and payouts have stayed the same. unless bit-x has actually chosen to not care about the fiat price as would be respected. BIT-X deals in terms of BTC for the signature campaign. I think that is a good thing, but I hope they stick to it if the price goes up.. Is everything ok regarding the campaign and your trust Marco? I have had no problems and everything seems to be running well, but having a big negative trust doesn't look good for BitX or the campaign, will it make a difference? Maybe he can choose a new "manager" and ask the bit-x team if they agree or not, but also for me it is not a real problem (at the end he can talk with who left him a negative trusts and maybe they can change it to a neutral one, but it is their choice). Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: pawel7777 on March 31, 2015, 10:21:11 AM Maybe he can choose a new "manager" and ask the bit-x team if they agree or not, but also for me it is not a real problem (at the end he can talk with who left him a negative trusts and maybe they can change it to a neutral one, but it is their choice). His trust is not the problem in running sig campaign, he's been managing it for a while now and he earned participants' trust, don't think anyone really bothers whether he's green or red. The problem is Marco is very active in the official Bit-x thread and pretty much acts as customer support there. It will be much harder to attract new customers with negative trust score. So yes, he should probably talk to Mitchełł and try to sort it out. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: funtotry on March 31, 2015, 01:51:02 PM I think that rates should be increased for next week unless we see a major price improvement in btc. Btc fell over 10% this week and payouts have stayed the same. unless bit-x has actually chosen to not care about the fiat price as would be respected. BIT-X deals in terms of BTC for the signature campaign. I think that is a good thing, but I hope they stick to it if the price goes up.. Is everything ok regarding the campaign and your trust Marco? I have had no problems and everything seems to be running well, but having a big negative trust doesn't look good for BitX or the campaign, will it make a difference? Maybe he can choose a new "manager" and ask the bit-x team if they agree or not, but also for me it is not a real problem (at the end he can talk with who left him a negative trusts and maybe they can change it to a neutral one, but it is their choice). Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on April 02, 2015, 08:30:03 PM Avatar advertising.
Yes or no? Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: alani123 on April 02, 2015, 08:36:41 PM Avatar advertising. Yes or no? I wouldn't really like this to be a thing again. :( Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: redsn0w on April 02, 2015, 08:45:57 PM Avatar advertising. Yes or no? If I can vote, I want to say : yes , why not. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: unamis76 on April 02, 2015, 08:46:49 PM Avatar advertising. Yes or no? Sure :) I'd be up to that Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: abyrnes81 on April 02, 2015, 09:15:31 PM Avatar advertising. Yes or no? Yes, I think I will put the bit-x avatar if you will pay a bonus weekly. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Lauda on April 02, 2015, 09:34:54 PM Avatar advertising. Well this could be useful. Avatars unlike signatures can't be disabled.Yes or no? You could add a bonus to people who use both, and add a special per post for people who only use avatars. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: redsn0w on April 02, 2015, 09:36:57 PM Avatar advertising. Well this could be useful. Avatars unlike signatures can't be disabled.Yes or no? You could add a bonus to people who use both, and add a special per post for people who only use avatars. I think you are wrong, if you will go here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=Your_forum_ID;sa=theme you will find Don't show users' avatars. So also the avatars "can be" disabled. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: pawel7777 on April 02, 2015, 10:00:16 PM Avatar advertising. Yes or no? No. Unless you get to choose whether you want to participate in signature or avatar campaign. One member with both will just look ridiculous. That's simply too much. Some threads are already overwhelmed with paid ads, let's keep healthy ads/content proportions. Edit: So also the avatars "can be" disabled. Yup, both can be disabled. And more people will be using those option if we overdose with ads. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: freedomno1 on April 03, 2015, 01:55:02 AM Avatar advertising. Yes or no? Optional but leaning towards No Don't want the precedent around if it can be avoided. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: gentlemand on April 03, 2015, 02:06:35 AM Avatar advertising. Yes or no? It's a no for me. That would be too much noise. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Wei H on April 03, 2015, 03:21:53 AM Avatar advertising. Yes or no? Definitely yes, but I would become a Full member next month. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Lauda on April 03, 2015, 05:09:57 AM I think you are wrong, if you will go here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=Your_forum_ID;sa=theme you will find Don't show users' avatars. Looks like I am. Sorry about that, I did not realize that it could be done. I'm however sure that more users have disabled signatures than avatars (if any).So also the avatars "can be" disabled. So the combination of signature + avatar could still be used. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: copuxin on April 03, 2015, 05:31:55 AM This thread will be used to discuss campaign changes arriving in the near future. What changes would you like to see? Your campaign should extend to newbie so that I can join it. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Amph on April 03, 2015, 07:01:23 AM Avatar advertising. Yes or no? yes but how it work exactly? spamming avatar all over the place? lol Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: --Encrypted-- on April 03, 2015, 10:33:13 AM Avatar advertising. Yes or no? as long as it is not prohibited, why not? so Yes Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: crazyivan on April 03, 2015, 10:38:36 AM How does that work? We change our avatar to something related to Bit X and add a link bellow?
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: redsn0w on April 03, 2015, 10:42:37 AM How does that work? We change our avatar to something related to Bit X and add a link bellow? I think (if marcotheminer will start also the avatar campaign) we should add something like that : https://bitcointalk.org/useravatars/avatar_147773.png A normal bit-x to the right side of ours avatar but I don't know the rates per week or month. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Lauda on April 03, 2015, 11:20:23 AM I think (if marcotheminer will start also the avatar campaign) we should add something like that : That's bad. An avatar made for bit-x should be put there and used. Although I don't think I'd ever give up on my burger eating cat..A normal bit-x to the right side of ours avatar but I don't know the rates per week or month. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: NUFCrichard on April 03, 2015, 11:26:16 AM Avatar advertising. Yes or no? No thanks The normal avatars can be funny and interesting, I think people see the companies enough in the signatures, there is no need to overwhelm the forum with avatar advertising too. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: kowwip on April 03, 2015, 12:31:08 PM Hi everyone,
I am newbie, I don't know what is avatar advertising ? Please tell me about that! Sincere thanks ! Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: hilariousandco on April 03, 2015, 01:09:55 PM Like signature advertising but with your avatar (which you can't have until you're a Full Member). However, I don't think there have been any avatar campaigns yet just the speculation of them.
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: erikalui on April 03, 2015, 01:19:25 PM It's good if an Avatar campaign starts but I would not prefer participating in it. My current Avatar is the best and I don't want to change it ever 8)
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: funtotry on April 03, 2015, 02:19:34 PM Avatar advertising. I vote yes. Its the sa me kind of idea as personal message advertising but its a photo and you can get lots of exposure from it. Since its a photo you can add your logo to it.Yes or no? Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: irfan_pak10 on April 03, 2015, 02:42:29 PM Hi everyone, I am newbie, I don't know what is avatar advertising ? Please tell me about that! Sincere thanks ! Avatar Is a profile Pic. People Like Marco will buy your Avatar annd you will have to Upload A Pic in your avatar that they will have provide you. Avatar advertising. Yes or no? I would Like to say YES! Its would be great thing, If its allowed By admin. Because Many people is asking it about but No one Answered this question yet. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: hilariousandco on April 03, 2015, 02:57:15 PM People Like Marco will buy your Avatar annd you will have to Upload A Pic in your avatar that they will have provide you. Has that actually been confirmed by him? And are you sure he wants you having the same avatar as him? Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: irfan_pak10 on April 03, 2015, 03:11:21 PM People Like Marco will buy your Avatar annd you will have to Upload A Pic in your avatar that they will have provide you. Has that actually been confirmed by him? And are you sure he wants you having the same avatar as him? Quote Has that actually been confirmed by him No its Not confirmed any thing from him. I liked His Avatar and I uploaded it for free ;) Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: ahmedjamal1998 on April 03, 2015, 03:14:44 PM Quote Avatar advertising. Yes or no? I vote No! It'd be better if we leave something for the members ! Anyway Good Luck ;) Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: joksim299 on April 03, 2015, 05:25:50 PM Quote Avatar advertising. Yes or no? I vote No! It'd be better if we leave something for the members ! Anyway Good Luck ;) I vote yes ;D Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Superhitech on April 03, 2015, 05:35:50 PM I think if avatars are to be sold, they should just be displayed like Marco's avatar, with his actual avatar on one side and the BIT-X logo/name on the other.
That way, avatars can still be unique, and people can earn bitcoin without the forum getting spammed with the same avatar. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: hilariousandco on April 03, 2015, 06:10:55 PM I think if avatars are to be sold, they should just be displayed like Marco's avatar, with his actual avatar on one side and the BIT-X logo/name on the other. That way, avatars can still be unique, and people can earn bitcoin without the forum getting spammed with the same avatar. Not a bad idea or compromise but I think it'll be a bit of a hassle for everyone to edit them onto their own. It's also much less exposure for the campaign. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on April 03, 2015, 09:57:00 PM Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: abyrnes81 on April 03, 2015, 10:01:59 PM Good! Can I ask you if there will be an 'avatar campaign'? Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: hilariousandco on April 03, 2015, 10:03:05 PM Looks good but you might want to mention that bit-x is an exchange as peeps might just think it's solely the debit card.
Good! Can I ask you if there will be an 'avatar campaign'? I'm interested in knowing that as well. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: joksim299 on April 03, 2015, 10:12:49 PM Nice design it looks attractive Follow https://bit-x.com/cards if you want more info Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: unamis76 on April 04, 2015, 12:12:29 AM Looks good! be sure to tell us when to change our sig :) Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: dznuts85 on April 04, 2015, 08:03:33 AM definitely looks better for the best sig campaign yet.. i like that one :D Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on April 04, 2015, 03:11:30 PM So theymos has allowed the selling of avatars. I will have a serious think about it.
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: pawel7777 on April 04, 2015, 03:27:07 PM Looks much better imo Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: irfan_pak10 on April 04, 2015, 04:06:01 PM So theymos has allowed the selling of avatars. I will have a serious think about it. Where it is posted link please? Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: abyrnes81 on April 04, 2015, 04:10:55 PM So theymos has allowed the selling of avatars. I will have a serious think about it. Where it is posted link please? This is his post: Quote 1) Is nudity allowed? If so, to what extreme? To a non nsfw tag? No. Quote 2) Is NSFL allowed? [NSFL = Not Safe For Life] No. Quote 3) Is other adult content allowed? Maybe. If I receive (or anticipate receiving) several complaints about something, it's probably too much. Quote 4) Are paid avatar campaigns allowed? Yes. Quote 5) Is copyright content allowed? How should copyright holders request deletion of infringing content? You are not allowed to infringe copyright, of course. I have no way of knowing whether you have a license to use particular images, and it's additionally sometimes difficult to determine whether fair use applies, so I will not be proactively removing possibly-infringing images. The DMCA process is used. Quote 6) Is racial / sexist content allowed? Probably. Quote 7) Is there a limit on 'annoyingness'? Animation is not allowed, so I feel like it'd be difficult to create an avatar that is sufficiently annoying that I'd want to remove it. Quote 8 ) Are 'imitation' avatars allowed? Ie wearing avatars of specific companies to give the false impression of representation. Copying someone's avatar in order to impersonate them or cause confusion is not allowed. But if you both use some generic picture of some famous person or something, that's probably not going to count, and using elements of someone's avatar for purposes other than impersonation will probably be allowed. Same for companies. Quote 9) How should users report those with infringing avatars? DMCA takedown notices or any other legal thing must be emailed to me. For other issues, post about it in Meta. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: nioc on April 04, 2015, 05:16:19 PM I vote no for avatars.
I like mine. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: gkv9 on April 04, 2015, 05:20:31 PM I vote no for avatars. I like mine. Seems you don't have one currently... So, adding Bit-X's avatar (when campaign will start) to earn some more BTC meanwhile ain't a bad deal I guess... :) In the end, choice is yours obviously... Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Amph on April 05, 2015, 07:56:17 AM I vote no for avatars. I like mine. it depend on the payment really, if they say to you that with the avatar you would get 0.03 a day, i'm sure you will accept it Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: nioc on April 05, 2015, 08:27:39 PM A flat rate of 0.03per day, cool. I would consider giving up my avatar even though its the same one Satoshi used.
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on April 05, 2015, 11:27:28 PM A flat rate of 0.03per day, cool. I would consider giving up my avatar even though its the same one Satoshi used. Made me smile, thanks for that. What does everyone think of my current signature? Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: dznuts85 on April 06, 2015, 02:39:08 AM A flat rate of 0.03per day, cool. I would consider giving up my avatar even though its the same one Satoshi used. Made me smile, thanks for that. What does everyone think of my current signature? i dont like your current signature marco.. the last one you showed us is better because it is more colorful :) Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: waterpile on April 06, 2015, 02:48:24 AM A flat rate of 0.03per day, cool. I would consider giving up my avatar even though its the same one Satoshi used. Made me smile, thanks for that. What does everyone think of my current signature? I think of it like when i printed something and came out short of ink.. I think some of the words are hard to read. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: crazyivan on April 06, 2015, 06:04:37 AM A flat rate of 0.03per day, cool. I would consider giving up my avatar even though its the same one Satoshi used. Made me smile, thanks for that. What does everyone think of my current signature? Yap, I also think this old one s better cause it s more colorful, I guess it draws more attention which should translate into more clicks. Regarding text, if you would like to underline the credit card offer, that s fine. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: umairsaleem on April 06, 2015, 07:13:51 AM A flat rate of 0.03per day, cool. I would consider giving up my avatar even though its the same one Satoshi used. Made me smile, thanks for that. What does everyone think of my current signature? I suggest signature have to be regularly redesigned to catch new attention, once a month, maybe two. This is better I think. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: dothebeats on April 06, 2015, 07:15:43 AM This signature is cool, IMO. The colors look vibrant and more attractive to the eye. Can we please see this signature soon? A flat rate of 0.03per day, cool. I would consider giving up my avatar even though its the same one Satoshi used. Made me smile, thanks for that. What does everyone think of my current signature? I think of it like when i printed something and came out short of ink.. I think some of the words are hard to read. Those instances made me realize that I somehow need to check the ink level before printing colored documents. Needs color, actually. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: thebitcoinquiz.com on April 06, 2015, 05:47:24 PM I was just thinking that can we have a countdown timer which shows the time left for our next payment(the countdown can be shown on the bitsig.website/beta page itself.
This would be very helpful and will limit the panicking signature campaigners. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: gkv9 on April 06, 2015, 06:15:11 PM I was just thinking that can we have a countdown timer which shows the time left for our next payment(the countdown can be shown on the bitsig.website/beta page itself. This would be very helpful and will limit the panicking signature campaigners. This might be possible but seems a hassle though for the devs I see as it might take some more work as each and every user registered at different time and on different dates... Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: abyrnes81 on April 06, 2015, 06:23:03 PM I was just thinking that can we have a countdown timer which shows the time left for our next payment(the countdown can be shown on the bitsig.website/beta page itself. This would be very helpful and will limit the panicking signature campaigners. This might be possible but seems a hassle though for the devs I see as it might take some more work as each and every user registered at different time and on different dates... No, he can use the forum time "as official time" and put a little countdown for each enrolled user. It will not so difficult to add it (IMHO). Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: pawel7777 on April 06, 2015, 07:09:17 PM I was just thinking that can we have a countdown timer which shows the time left for our next payment(the countdown can be shown on the bitsig.website/beta page itself. This would be very helpful and will limit the panicking signature campaigners. This might be possible but seems a hassle though for the devs I see as it might take some more work as each and every user registered at different time and on different dates... No, he can use the forum time "as official time" and put a little countdown for each enrolled user. It will not so difficult to add it (IMHO). And I want an animated chart with comparison of my weekly post number, weekly changes, breakdown of posts in each board, prediction of my future post number based on my past behavior. The soundtrack to make viewing stats more pleasant (nothing fancy, just 10-20 songs to choose from). Also I want some random 'fun fact' and 'daily joke' displayed, and some live stream of some recent movies would be great. Am I asking for too much? c'mon you guys... Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: thebitcoinquiz.com on April 06, 2015, 07:17:08 PM I was just thinking that can we have a countdown timer which shows the time left for our next payment(the countdown can be shown on the bitsig.website/beta page itself. This would be very helpful and will limit the panicking signature campaigners. This might be possible but seems a hassle though for the devs I see as it might take some more work as each and every user registered at different time and on different dates... No, he can use the forum time "as official time" and put a little countdown for each enrolled user. It will not so difficult to add it (IMHO). I was just thinking that can we have a countdown timer which shows the time left for our next payment(the countdown can be shown on the bitsig.website/beta page itself. This would be very helpful and will limit the panicking signature campaigners. This might be possible but seems a hassle though for the devs I see as it might take some more work as each and every user registered at different time and on different dates... No, he can use the forum time "as official time" and put a little countdown for each enrolled user. It will not so difficult to add it (IMHO). And I want an animated chart with comparison of my weekly post number, weekly changes, breakdown of posts in each board, prediction of my future post number based on my past behavior. The soundtrack to make viewing stats more pleasant (nothing fancy, just 10-20 songs to choose from). Also I want some random 'fun fact' and 'daily joke' displayed, and some live stream of some recent movies would be great. Am I asking for too much? c'mon you guys... But still I have just asked a countdown for people who get tensed and keep question, when will i get paid!!?? Its required in this campaign and its not too much. Stop over reacting. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: pawel7777 on April 06, 2015, 07:39:13 PM That actually would be fun. But still I have just asked a countdown for people who get tensed and keep question, when will i get paid!!?? Its required in this campaign and its not too much. Stop over reacting. You should get paid the same time you got paid last week. If the timing is not the same (ie payments are initiated manually etc) then countdown-clock would either be inaccurate or impossible to implement. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: coinpr0n on April 07, 2015, 07:47:07 PM I personally wouldn't use avatar advertising but I can see why some people could want it. If I had to vote? No :P
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: abyrnes81 on April 07, 2015, 07:48:40 PM I personally wouldn't use avatar advertising but I can see why some people could want it. If I had to vote? No :P It will be a bonus to those who want "put" a bit-x near their avatar, and I think it will be a nice and not spammy advertising. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: funtotry on April 07, 2015, 08:44:29 PM An addition I would like to see is the payout date. This is likely stored in the same DB that the other info on the bitsig site is retreived from, and its one more <?php echo $row['paydate'] ?>
Its not hard to add and its VERY useful for all the people asking "when will we get paid" Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: dznuts85 on April 08, 2015, 01:42:21 AM I personally wouldn't use avatar advertising but I can see why some people could want it. If I had to vote? No :P some people might want to join avatar advertising if they started it to earn some more coins. An addition I would like to see is the payout date. This is likely stored in the same DB that the other info on the bitsig site is retreived from, and its one more <?php echo $row['paydate'] ?> Its not hard to add and its VERY useful for all the people asking "when will we get paid" agree to this. some might really want to know how much time left from when they will get their payments. showing this wouldnt be a problem i guess :) Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: umairsaleem on April 08, 2015, 01:48:29 AM I personally wouldn't use avatar advertising but I can see why some people could want it. If I had to vote? No :P some people might want to join avatar advertising if they started it to earn some more coins. An addition I would like to see is the payout date. This is likely stored in the same DB that the other info on the bitsig site is retreived from, and its one more <?php echo $row['paydate'] ?> Its not hard to add and its VERY useful for all the people asking "when will we get paid" agree to this. some might really want to know how much time left from when they will get their payments. showing this wouldnt be a problem i guess :) I agree too, I was wonder when exactly my payment time is, just simply add this feature into that bot, I believe this is not a difficult stuff to do. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: funtotry on April 08, 2015, 02:35:54 AM I personally wouldn't use avatar advertising but I can see why some people could want it. If I had to vote? No :P some people might want to join avatar advertising if they started it to earn some more coins. An addition I would like to see is the payout date. This is likely stored in the same DB that the other info on the bitsig site is retreived from, and its one more <?php echo $row['paydate'] ?> Its not hard to add and its VERY useful for all the people asking "when will we get paid" agree to this. some might really want to know how much time left from when they will get their payments. showing this wouldnt be a problem i guess :) On a side note there is 0.4 left in the sig campaign wallet... Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: dznuts85 on April 08, 2015, 03:44:34 AM I personally wouldn't use avatar advertising but I can see why some people could want it. If I had to vote? No :P some people might want to join avatar advertising if they started it to earn some more coins. An addition I would like to see is the payout date. This is likely stored in the same DB that the other info on the bitsig site is retreived from, and its one more <?php echo $row['paydate'] ?> Its not hard to add and its VERY useful for all the people asking "when will we get paid" agree to this. some might really want to know how much time left from when they will get their payments. showing this wouldnt be a problem i guess :) On a side note there is 0.4 left in the sig campaign wallet... only got 0.007 left now on the wallet, marco should add some funds again to it or it might cause some problems on payout specially for those who will recieve their payment later Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: gkv9 on April 08, 2015, 03:49:19 AM only got 0.007 left now on the wallet, marco should add some funds again to it or it might cause some problems on payout specially for those who will recieve their payment later Don't worry guys, he is honest in all his work and so, no one will lose any payments for their work... :) Just be patient, it's my own payment time and just an hour remaining, so whether the funds are remaining or not, I know I am gonna get paid for sure... Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: dznuts85 on April 08, 2015, 04:04:56 AM only got 0.007 left now on the wallet, marco should add some funds again to it or it might cause some problems on payout specially for those who will recieve their payment later Don't worry guys, he is honest in all his work and so, no one will lose any payments for their work... :) Just be patient, it's my own payment time and just an hour remaining, so whether the funds are remaining or not, I know I am gonna get paid for sure... i know they gonna pay all of us, im just thinking that i could cause a problem on the bot :) Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: NUFCrichard on April 08, 2015, 09:17:54 AM I personally wouldn't use avatar advertising but I can see why some people could want it. If I had to vote? No :P some people might want to join avatar advertising if they started it to earn some more coins. An addition I would like to see is the payout date. This is likely stored in the same DB that the other info on the bitsig site is retreived from, and its one more <?php echo $row['paydate'] ?> Its not hard to add and its VERY useful for all the people asking "when will we get paid" agree to this. some might really want to know how much time left from when they will get their payments. showing this wouldnt be a problem i guess :) On a side note there is 0.4 left in the sig campaign wallet... Why do you need to know exactly when you will be paid? If it is always on Tuesday morning, is that not good enough? Even if they put a counter on the bot page, it will still depend on if the wallet is funded, if they have checked through your posts, if bitcointalk is available and how long the transaction takes to confirm.. As long as I get paid fairly promptly, it's fine by me, keep up the good work marco Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: NeuroticFish on April 08, 2015, 09:47:43 AM Maybe we could use new banners / sigs. Maybe somebody can design better / less "eye-hurting" bit-x banner.
I am paid for them and I don't complain, but others seem to start blocking signatures, and from what I see bit-x is one of the most important targets. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on April 08, 2015, 10:37:45 AM Maybe we could use new banners / sigs. Maybe somebody can design better / less "eye-hurting" bit-x banner. I am paid for them and I don't complain, but others seem to start blocking signatures, and from what I see bit-x is one of the most important targets. I've designed 2 new signatures for seniors/heroes for when the new campaign launches! Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: gkv9 on April 08, 2015, 01:11:26 PM I've designed 2 new signatures for seniors/heroes for when the new campaign launches! Awesome, just waiting for the new codes... Your new signature is looking awesome anyways, Sir... ;) Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: funtotry on April 08, 2015, 02:26:39 PM Maybe we could use new banners / sigs. Maybe somebody can design better / less "eye-hurting" bit-x banner. I am paid for them and I don't complain, but others seem to start blocking signatures, and from what I see bit-x is one of the most important targets. I've designed 2 new signatures for seniors/heroes for when the new campaign launches! Also you should add a ?ref=btc on the URL in the signatures for analytical reasons. You can see what kind of traffic you are getting from direct signature clicks. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on April 08, 2015, 03:06:33 PM Maybe we could use new banners / sigs. Maybe somebody can design better / less "eye-hurting" bit-x banner. I am paid for them and I don't complain, but others seem to start blocking signatures, and from what I see bit-x is one of the most important targets. I've designed 2 new signatures for seniors/heroes for when the new campaign launches! Also you should add a ?ref=btc on the URL in the signatures for analytical reasons. You can see what kind of traffic you are getting from direct signature clicks. I am the signature designer ;) Thanks! Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: abyrnes81 on April 08, 2015, 03:14:41 PM Maybe we could use new banners / sigs. Maybe somebody can design better / less "eye-hurting" bit-x banner. I am paid for them and I don't complain, but others seem to start blocking signatures, and from what I see bit-x is one of the most important targets. I've designed 2 new signatures for seniors/heroes for when the new campaign launches! Also you should add a ?ref=btc on the URL in the signatures for analytical reasons. You can see what kind of traffic you are getting from direct signature clicks. I am the signature designer ;) Thanks! News about the avatar campaign? Do you know the "rates" or not? I think you will pay (if the avatar campaign) the same rate for everyone because full member, sr and hero can put the same avatar so there is not any difference. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: dothebeats on April 08, 2015, 06:21:47 PM marcotheminer, I have some questions to ask regarding the campaign that you are managing.
Can I change the deposit address that has been registered by the bot, or it will stay like that until I re-enroll? I'm not sure about it and I'm planning to change the deposit address in Bit-X as well. The cellphone number that I'm using to confirm the auth code in Bit-x is being used by my girlfriend and most of the time, she isn't home. Second is that when will be the next date of the new campaign launch? Are they (the Bit-X management, also you) planning to put an avatar campaign together with the existing signature campaign? Will it be paid as two different campaigns or is is required to have the signature first before the avatar? Hope you respond to my questions! :D Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on April 08, 2015, 06:43:45 PM marcotheminer, I have some questions to ask regarding the campaign that you are managing. Can I change the deposit address that has been registered by the bot, or it will stay like that until I re-enroll? I'm not sure about it and I'm planning to change the deposit address in Bit-X as well. The cellphone number that I'm using to confirm the auth code in Bit-x is being used by my girlfriend and most of the time, she isn't home. Second is that when will be the next date of the new campaign launch? Are they (the Bit-X management, also you) planning to put an avatar campaign together with the existing signature campaign? Will it be paid as two different campaigns or is is required to have the signature first before the avatar? Hope you respond to my questions! :D You may change your deposit address, sure. The new campaign will come mid April, solely an estimation. An avatar campaign might happen, not yet sure about it. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: redsn0w on April 08, 2015, 06:46:01 PM Maybe we could use new banners / sigs. Maybe somebody can design better / less "eye-hurting" bit-x banner. I am paid for them and I don't complain, but others seem to start blocking signatures, and from what I see bit-x is one of the most important targets. I've designed 2 new signatures for seniors/heroes for when the new campaign launches! Also you should add a ?ref=btc on the URL in the signatures for analytical reasons. You can see what kind of traffic you are getting from direct signature clicks. I am the signature designer ;) Thanks! News about the avatar campaign? Do you know the "rates" or not? I think you will pay (if the avatar campaign) the same rate for everyone because full member, sr and hero can put the same avatar so there is not any difference. I'm also interested to know their 'thought' about a possible avatar campaign. @marcotheminer, can you give us a rapid and essential report? Thanks for the attention. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on April 08, 2015, 06:46:33 PM Maybe we could use new banners / sigs. Maybe somebody can design better / less "eye-hurting" bit-x banner. I am paid for them and I don't complain, but others seem to start blocking signatures, and from what I see bit-x is one of the most important targets. I've designed 2 new signatures for seniors/heroes for when the new campaign launches! Also you should add a ?ref=btc on the URL in the signatures for analytical reasons. You can see what kind of traffic you are getting from direct signature clicks. I am the signature designer ;) Thanks! News about the avatar campaign? Do you know the "rates" or not? I think you will pay (if the avatar campaign) the same rate for everyone because full member, sr and hero can put the same avatar so there is not any difference. I'm also interested to know their 'thought' about a possible avatar campaign. @marcotheminer, can you give us a rapid and essential report? Thanks for the attention. Rapid: Not yet sure. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: dothebeats on April 08, 2015, 06:55:06 PM marcotheminer, I have some questions to ask regarding the campaign that you are managing. Can I change the deposit address that has been registered by the bot, or it will stay like that until I re-enroll? I'm not sure about it and I'm planning to change the deposit address in Bit-X as well. The cellphone number that I'm using to confirm the auth code in Bit-x is being used by my girlfriend and most of the time, she isn't home. Second is that when will be the next date of the new campaign launch? Are they (the Bit-X management, also you) planning to put an avatar campaign together with the existing signature campaign? Will it be paid as two different campaigns or is is required to have the signature first before the avatar? Hope you respond to my questions! :D You may change your deposit address, sure. The new campaign will come mid April, solely an estimation. An avatar campaign might happen, not yet sure about it. Sweet! But how am I going to do that? Will I just change the deposit address in the other contact info and the bot will automatically recognize it? Or do I need to re-enroll to the campaign. I'm not sure how to do it. ??? Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on April 08, 2015, 07:18:49 PM marcotheminer, I have some questions to ask regarding the campaign that you are managing. Can I change the deposit address that has been registered by the bot, or it will stay like that until I re-enroll? I'm not sure about it and I'm planning to change the deposit address in Bit-X as well. The cellphone number that I'm using to confirm the auth code in Bit-x is being used by my girlfriend and most of the time, she isn't home. Second is that when will be the next date of the new campaign launch? Are they (the Bit-X management, also you) planning to put an avatar campaign together with the existing signature campaign? Will it be paid as two different campaigns or is is required to have the signature first before the avatar? Hope you respond to my questions! :D You may change your deposit address, sure. The new campaign will come mid April, solely an estimation. An avatar campaign might happen, not yet sure about it. Sweet! But how am I going to do that? Will I just change the deposit address in the other contact info and the bot will automatically recognize it? Or do I need to re-enroll to the campaign. I'm not sure how to do it. ??? Yep, just change it. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: funtotry on April 08, 2015, 09:12:28 PM Maybe we could use new banners / sigs. Maybe somebody can design better / less "eye-hurting" bit-x banner. I am paid for them and I don't complain, but others seem to start blocking signatures, and from what I see bit-x is one of the most important targets. I've designed 2 new signatures for seniors/heroes for when the new campaign launches! Also you should add a ?ref=btc on the URL in the signatures for analytical reasons. You can see what kind of traffic you are getting from direct signature clicks. I am the signature designer ;) Thanks! Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: redsn0w on April 08, 2015, 09:28:11 PM Thanks @marcotheminer! Payment received (as always) and I have withdrawn it to my address :D.
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: dznuts85 on April 09, 2015, 01:47:00 AM Thanks @marcotheminer! Payment received (as always) and I have withdrawn it to my address :D. recieved mine as well. i requested a withdrawal and it is on process right now.. thanks bit-x :) Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Lauda on April 09, 2015, 10:38:31 AM Marco if you really want to spice up the campaign you should do something unique. This is just the same old boring pay per post campaign.
At least bring back some (they can even be very tiny) bonuses/awards for the best posters (in addition to writing their names somewhere). Even a 0.0001 reward would kill off some of the monotonousness. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on April 09, 2015, 10:39:26 AM Marco if you really want to spice up the campaign you should do something unique. This is just the same old boring pay per post campaign. At least bring back some (they can even be very tiny) bonuses/awards for the best posters (in addition to writing their names somewhere). Even a 0.0001 reward would kill off some of the monotonousness. I'll consider it :) Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: hilariousandco on April 09, 2015, 10:53:27 AM Do a raffle or something. Put x amount of best posters in a draw for a big prize at the end of the month. Just make sure the draw is verifiablly fair. I think rewards for the best posters will definitely push up the overall quality of your campaign quite a bit.
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: pawel7777 on April 09, 2015, 11:39:12 AM Do a raffle or something. Put x amount of best posters in a draw for a big prize at the end of the month. Just make sure the draw is verifiablly fair. I think rewards for the best posters will definitely push up the overall quality of your campaign quite a bit. Raffle sounds good (I suggested the idea in the past). But how would you define who's good poster and who isn't? Everyone consider themselves as 'good posters', so whoever you choose, there will be a bunch of people disappointed with excluding them. If one member makes 9 shitty posts but 1 really good one (something innovative, sparking useful discussion etc), is he better or worse than someone with 10 posts of average quality? Not to mention that, to make a fair judgement, Marco would have to go through every single post of every participant. Maybe a raffle open for everyone is better idea? With some minimum posts/week requirement. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on April 09, 2015, 05:13:45 PM How about a joining bonus if you switch from another campaign to Bit-X's and stay for a few weeks?
That could be very interesting :P Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: umairsaleem on April 09, 2015, 05:25:06 PM How about a joining bonus if you switch from another campaign to Bit-X's and stay for a few weeks? That could be very interesting :P Then some may leave and join other campaign and rejoin our campaign again to claim the bonus? I would love to give the member who stick with this campaign a bonus. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: thebitcoinquiz.com on April 09, 2015, 05:41:47 PM How about a joining bonus if you switch from another campaign to Bit-X's and stay for a few weeks? Why not some bonus for those who are loyal to your campaign and are there in it for like more than 2-3 months or so?That could be very interesting :P Always remember, if someone can leave other campaign for your bonus then he can also run away from your campaign after he gets the bonus. Although this would certainly attract people, but the people who have been there in the campaign since quite a few time, they should also be appreciated for their loyality. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on April 09, 2015, 06:37:20 PM How about a joining bonus if you switch from another campaign to Bit-X's and stay for a few weeks? That could be very interesting :P Then some may leave and join other campaign and rejoin our campaign again to claim the bonus? I would love to give the member who stick with this campaign a bonus. That would be better yep. I'll have a think about this too. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: dothebeats on April 09, 2015, 07:13:24 PM Do a raffle or something. Put x amount of best posters in a draw for a big prize at the end of the month. Just make sure the draw is verifiablly fair. I think rewards for the best posters will definitely push up the overall quality of your campaign quite a bit. This might be good if ever it is implemented. And the users who are in this campaign that are eligible to join must be quality posters and not the ones who post the most. Giving up prizes for those users who posts well enough are good, because it will motivate others to post "quality" posts and not the yes-it's-constructive ones. It will also push the quality of the posts in this forum up, because basically users will strive to get that bonus reward that is already waiting for them. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: abyrnes81 on April 09, 2015, 07:16:50 PM 99 posts only today : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=320943
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: hilariousandco on April 09, 2015, 07:26:08 PM 99 posts only today : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=320943 Doesn't matter how many posts you do but his are actually constructive, unlike most of yours. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: dothebeats on April 09, 2015, 07:40:06 PM 99 posts only today : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=320943 In case you are really reading the forum rules and guidelines, there is actually no limit on how many you can post per day. As long as it is on-topic and is constructive, it will likely stay. However, most post tend to be off-topic and spammy, sometimes in the intention of boosting posts for signature campaign members. It is fine to post a hundred or even a thousand per day, as long as it is, well, constructive and helping the discussion. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Amph on April 09, 2015, 09:07:26 PM 99 posts only today : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=320943 In case you are really reading the forum rules and guidelines, there is actually no limit on how many you can post per day. As long as it is on-topic and is constructive, it will likely stay. However, most post tend to be off-topic and spammy, sometimes in the intention of boosting posts for signature campaign members. It is fine to post a hundred or even a thousand per day, as long as it is, well, constructive and helping the discussion. the problem is that some of his post are not included in one post, there are case, were he posted 3 posts in a row, that is spam to me, it doesn't matter if those posts are constructive or on topic in this case if that is allowed, i can do the same thing easily Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: umairsaleem on April 10, 2015, 12:55:45 AM 99 posts only today : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=320943 In case you are really reading the forum rules and guidelines, there is actually no limit on how many you can post per day. As long as it is on-topic and is constructive, it will likely stay. However, most post tend to be off-topic and spammy, sometimes in the intention of boosting posts for signature campaign members. It is fine to post a hundred or even a thousand per day, as long as it is, well, constructive and helping the discussion. the problem is that some of his post are not included in one post, there are case, were he posted 3 posts in a row, that is spam to me, it doesn't matter if those posts are constructive or on topic in this case if that is allowed, i can do the same thing easily He is a Indian, he is probably need this money. Yes, most of his posts are constructive, but 100 posts a day seems to much for ordinary people, you can eat 10 hamburgers in one day, but you definitely couldn't eat 100 hamburgers in one day, this is same to this forum, Also, this forum didn't have that much topics that make you able to make 100 constructive posts in one day. 100 posts in one day, that means a you need to turn the whole forum topsy-turning. Anyway, he didn't broke the rule even he makes so much posts in a day, that's most people can't be able to do. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Amph on April 10, 2015, 05:56:41 AM 99 posts only today : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=320943 In case you are really reading the forum rules and guidelines, there is actually no limit on how many you can post per day. As long as it is on-topic and is constructive, it will likely stay. However, most post tend to be off-topic and spammy, sometimes in the intention of boosting posts for signature campaign members. It is fine to post a hundred or even a thousand per day, as long as it is, well, constructive and helping the discussion. the problem is that some of his post are not included in one post, there are case, were he posted 3 posts in a row, that is spam to me, it doesn't matter if those posts are constructive or on topic in this case if that is allowed, i can do the same thing easily He is a Indian, he is probably need this money. Yes, most of his posts are constructive, but 100 posts a day seems to much for ordinary people, you can eat 10 hamburgers in one day, but you definitely couldn't eat 100 hamburgers in one day, this is same to this forum, Also, this forum didn't have that much topics that make you able to make 100 constructive posts in one day. 100 posts in one day, that means a you need to turn the whole forum topsy-turning. Anyway, he didn't broke the rule even he makes so much posts in a day, that's most people can't be able to do. i don't think you have read what i wrote, the problem aren't 100 or 1k posts a day, and i'm not against him or anything, the problem is consolidating your posts, you can't post 3 posts in a row, when those can be included in one, i can do the same if this is allowed(i had many chances to do it, but i included all in one post, otherwise i would be at 100 posts too) and btw i need money too, everyone need money, some more some less, this is not an exscuse to spam Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: dothebeats on April 10, 2015, 08:04:21 AM 99 posts only today : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=320943 In case you are really reading the forum rules and guidelines, there is actually no limit on how many you can post per day. As long as it is on-topic and is constructive, it will likely stay. However, most post tend to be off-topic and spammy, sometimes in the intention of boosting posts for signature campaign members. It is fine to post a hundred or even a thousand per day, as long as it is, well, constructive and helping the discussion. the problem is that some of his post are not included in one post, there are case, were he posted 3 posts in a row, that is spam to me, it doesn't matter if those posts are constructive or on topic in this case if that is allowed, i can do the same thing easily He is a Indian, he is probably need this money. Yes, most of his posts are constructive, but 100 posts a day seems to much for ordinary people, you can eat 10 hamburgers in one day, but you definitely couldn't eat 100 hamburgers in one day, this is same to this forum, Also, this forum didn't have that much topics that make you able to make 100 constructive posts in one day. 100 posts in one day, that means a you need to turn the whole forum topsy-turning. Anyway, he didn't broke the rule even he makes so much posts in a day, that's most people can't be able to do. I don't think his nationality has something to do with his needs for money. ??? I agree that posting consecutive replies in one topic is another way to boost one's post count--especially if you are enrolled in a signature campaign. But sometimes, this is done for the convenience of other users/readers of this forum. Though you can actually cut out some important points that you want to reply to, still cutting out all those important points and replying to it in just one single comment is too hard to do--and too hard to read as well. The point and the idea in the topic might be messed up because of other topics under it is also included in one single reply. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on April 10, 2015, 08:17:03 AM I'll try my best to read through all these posts soon. I've decided to exclude posts from this thread I think that's fair enough?
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: hilariousandco on April 10, 2015, 08:26:41 AM I don't think his nationality has something to do with his needs for money. ??? Well some countires are poorer than others but that's irrelevant. I agree that posting consecutive replies in one topic is another way to boost one's post count--especially if you are enrolled in a signature campaign. But sometimes, this is done for the convenience of other users/readers of this forum. It's rarely necessary and is often done to boost post count more than anything but at least his posts are constructive and long in length. It would be quite different if they were just short spammy replies. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: OrangeSeller on April 10, 2015, 01:54:18 PM I agree that posting consecutive replies in one topic is another way to boost one's post count--especially if you are enrolled in a signature campaign. But sometimes, this is done for the convenience of other users/readers of this forum. It's rarely necessary and is often done to boost post count more than anything but at least his posts are constructive and long in length. It would be quite different if they were just short spammy replies. Still a spam, he can make it in 1 post Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Blazed on April 11, 2015, 12:18:16 AM I don't think his nationality has something to do with his needs for money. ??? Well some countires are poorer than others but that's irrelevant. I agree that posting consecutive replies in one topic is another way to boost one's post count--especially if you are enrolled in a signature campaign. But sometimes, this is done for the convenience of other users/readers of this forum. It's rarely necessary and is often done to boost post count more than anything but at least his posts are constructive and long in length. It would be quite different if they were just short spammy replies. Post length doesn't really make a post better though. Pretty obvious when people post multiple times in a row they are padding their post counts. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on April 14, 2015, 07:35:21 PM Now buying your avatar if you're an extremely popular, active or prominent member around the forum!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1024258.0 Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Lauda on April 14, 2015, 07:40:55 PM the problem is that some of his post are not included in one post, there are case, were he posted 3 posts in a row, that is spam to me, it doesn't matter if those posts are constructive or on topic in this case He is a Indian, he is probably need this money. if that is allowed, i can do the same thing easily Yes, most of his posts are constructive, but 100 posts a day seems to much for ordinary people, you can eat 10 hamburgers in one day, but you definitely couldn't eat 100 hamburgers in one day, this is same to this forum, Also, this forum didn't have that much topics that make you able to make 100 constructive posts in one day. 100 posts in one day, that means a you need to turn the whole forum topsy-turning. Anyway, he didn't broke the rule even he makes so much posts in a day, that's most people can't be able to do. and btw i need money too, everyone need money, some more some less, this is not an exscuse to spam The guy is spamming. It doesn't matter if he's American, Indian or Marsian; the rules are valid for everyone. Quote No problem for me. "Command line" is for Keybase-cli. So I guess you will have to go for next option. Sent you a PM. It's horrible that such behavior is accepted. Back in the old days, you'd get kicked and banned from the signature campaign before the staff bans you. http://weknowmemes.com/generator/uploads/generated/g1387848369429355374.jpg Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: xmasdobo on April 14, 2015, 11:09:51 PM Im not posting much lately, a lot of work, i'll try to post a bit during my small breaks. In any case, isn't it time to start considering a small raise? BTC has been crashing, yet the payments remain the same (im saying this for all campaings, not blaming this one). I know its a competitive market and all that but if the price just keeps crashing, someone has to start taking the lead in raising rates, otherwise sig campaings are going to start becoming faucets 2.0.
And everyone running a signature campaing that isn't automating their process needs to get with the time. Glad this one is one of the first after Bitmixer. As for posts quality, sometimes small one sentence posts can be great, while other people shit literally bricks but aren't all that great. For me it's relative. Of course the people posting 100 times a day need to calm the hell down. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: alani123 on April 17, 2015, 05:54:20 PM Hey marco, wasI'm going through my post history and noticed several old posts of mine that I'd like gone for personal reasons. Will this affect my payments? Also, is there something that could be done about it?
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on April 17, 2015, 06:09:29 PM Hey marco, wasI'm going through my post history and noticed several old posts of mine that I'd like gone for personal reasons. Will this affect my payments? Also, is there something that could be done about it? Unfortunately this will affect your payout if the posts being deleted are before when you enrolled. The bot sees it as a post less so it is counted like it. If it is a significant amount PM me and I'd be happy to pay the difference (I won't do this often for others reading this) Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Lauda on April 17, 2015, 09:37:16 PM Hey marco, wasI'm going through my post history and noticed several old posts of mine that I'd like gone for personal reasons. Will this affect my payments? Also, is there something that could be done about it? Unfortunately this will affect your payout if the posts being deleted are before when you enrolled. The bot sees it as a post less so it is counted like it. If it is a significant amount PM me and I'd be happy to pay the difference (I won't do this often for others reading this) Let's say that the bot just paid me at 9900 and then I delete 100 posts, and make 1. What happens? Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: pawel7777 on April 17, 2015, 10:22:50 PM Hey marco, wasI'm going through my post history and noticed several old posts of mine that I'd like gone for personal reasons. Will this affect my payments? Also, is there something that could be done about it? Unfortunately this will affect your payout if the posts being deleted are before when you enrolled. The bot sees it as a post less so it is counted like it. If it is a significant amount PM me and I'd be happy to pay the difference (I won't do this often for others reading this) Let's say that the bot just paid me at 9900 and then I delete 100 posts, and make 1. What happens? After payment is initiated, bot would simultaneously take the value of 9900 as a starting post. Then, I'm guessing, if 100 is deleted, it would show -100 and negative payment (unless it's written in the code that the values cannot be less than zero). Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: ajareselde on April 18, 2015, 02:47:53 PM Hey marco, wasI'm going through my post history and noticed several old posts of mine that I'd like gone for personal reasons. Will this affect my payments? Also, is there something that could be done about it? If i may suggest something; when you get paid for your posts, remove signature, delete posts that u want to delete , and return your signature (re-enroll) By some logic it should work, wont give you negative post count, because bot will see you as new recruit, and wont make you a loss, because you are doing this after your posts are already paid. Maybe marcotheminer can confirm this would work, and is an ok thing to do ? cheers Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on April 18, 2015, 02:59:41 PM I think it should work fine. Let me know if you come across any big issues.
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on April 19, 2015, 11:43:52 AM From this moment on: Meta, auctions, politics & society do not count towards a user's post count. This will last until the start of the new campaign, when things will change. (1 or 2 weeks from now). This big change was brought by the large increase in spam. Beginners & help may soon be excluded too, if posters do not improve. If you spam, or post unneeded replies, you will be kicked. End of discussion. Please play your part in keeping this forum readable :). Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: hilariousandco on April 19, 2015, 11:51:22 AM You should just cut down on spam and spammers rather than ban half the forum.
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on April 19, 2015, 11:54:46 AM You should just cut down on spam and spammers rather than ban half the forum. I'll do so too. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Lauda on April 19, 2015, 11:56:18 AM I'm seeing an unusually high rate of excluded post. What's going on?
What happens when threads get moved into a section that doesn't get counted? Update: I've found your post and I'm dissapointed. Because a group of individuals in the campaign is doing 50-100 posts daily you decide to punish everyone by excluding more sections? Hm. If the campaign in 2 weeks doesn't bring something good I'm probably going to leave it. Things are out of control. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: pawel7777 on April 19, 2015, 12:09:35 PM From this moment on: Meta, auctions, politics & society do not count towards a user's post count. Just for the record, are the posts made in those boards before the announcement counted or excluded? Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Lauda on April 19, 2015, 12:11:12 PM From this moment on: Meta, auctions, politics & society do not count towards a user's post count. Just for the record, are the posts made in those boards before the announcement counted or excluded? Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: pawel7777 on April 19, 2015, 12:12:49 PM From this moment on: Meta, auctions, politics & society do not count towards a user's post count. Just for the record, are the posts made in those boards before the announcement counted or excluded? If so, that's not right, you cannot change the rules like that. Plus, the announcement clearly states "From this moment", so previous posts should be counted. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on April 19, 2015, 12:16:17 PM All previous posts will be counted. The bot just needs to know that. I'll look into it.
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: irfan_pak10 on April 19, 2015, 12:27:39 PM Hi Marco please add Next payment date option in the bot. And please don't make changes in the mid of the week, lol.
Thanks Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on April 19, 2015, 12:37:57 PM Sorry if this gets confusing: There have been no changes until the campaign launches in 1-2 weeks
Meta, auctions, politics & society still count. I will be reviewing all members once again. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on April 19, 2015, 12:38:28 PM Hi Marco please add Next payment date option in the bot. And please don't make changes in the mid of the week, lol. Thanks It's actually the beginning of the week and as per the campaign thread if rules are to be changed they do so on Monday. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: marcotheminer on April 19, 2015, 12:38:47 PM Sorry if this gets confusing: There have been no changes until the campaign launches in 1-2 weeks Meta, auctions, politics & society still count. I will be reviewing all members once again. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: erikalui on April 19, 2015, 01:17:33 PM How about considering 1 post per thread in the Politics & Society/Meta threads in the coming campaign? I have usually seen people keep posting in 1-2 threads again and again and have over 10-15 replies in one thread.
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: hilariousandco on April 19, 2015, 01:39:53 PM How about considering 1 post per thread in the Politics & Society/Meta threads in the coming campaign? I have usually seen people keep posting in 1-2 threads again and again and have over 10-15 replies in one thread. That would probably be hard to do with the bot but people shouldn't be penalised if they get into dialogue or a meaningful conversation in a thread. As I've said before, there should be little to no restrictions of where you can post but the campaign manager should crack down on spammers instead or preferably not allow them onto the campaign in the first place. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: erikalui on April 19, 2015, 01:45:48 PM That would probably be hard to do with the bot but people shouldn't be penalised if they get into dialogue or a meaningful conversation in a thread. As I've said before, there should be little to no restrictions of where you can post but the campaign manager should crack down on spammers instead or preferably not allow them onto the campaign in the first place. It's not about restrictions as now as well many members do post in off topic and other Local sections even if they are excluded. Yeah, it would be hard for a bot to do it but if we set a counter that counts the number of posts by a member in a thread in those sections, all posts above "1" would be excluded which won't be hard to code. It's like an "if and else" statement. It's just to prevent any member from spamming and they will know that if I keep posting here, I won't get paid and those who post there, will be posting inspite of not getting paid and will thus stop spamming and make constructive posts. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: hilariousandco on April 19, 2015, 02:01:02 PM Your logic doesn't make sense. It won't stop spamming at all. It actually encourages it. Should we not encourage people getting into meaningful conversations but instead just pay them to make one spam comment in as many different threads as they can because that's what will happen? Clamp down on actual spammers not just people who get into a conversation or discussion in a thread.
Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: redsn0w on April 19, 2015, 02:04:23 PM Your logic doesn't make sense. It won't stop spamming at all. It actually encourages it. Should we not encourage people getting into meaningful conversations but instead just pay them to make one spam comment in as many different threads as they can because that's what will happen? Clamp down on actual spammers not just people who get into a conversation or discussion in a thread. I think every users (also if he is not paid for his posts) should 'make a post' only if he wants to add something 'useful' to the thread, or want to say his personal opinion about that fact. If someone doesn't know what he is saying why the hell he 'make that post'? Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: Lauda on April 19, 2015, 02:13:44 PM Your logic doesn't make sense. It won't stop spamming at all. It actually encourages it. Should we not encourage people getting into meaningful conversations but instead just pay them to make one spam comment in as many different threads as they can because that's what will happen? Clamp down on actual spammers not just people who get into a conversation or discussion in a thread. I think every users (also if he is not paid for his posts) should 'make a post' only if he wants to add something 'useful' to the thread, or want to say his personal opinion about that fact. If someone doesn't know what he is saying why the hell he 'make that post'? Who likes to waste their whole day here? Nobody. Especially people with flawed English who are making a lot of posts, definitely spam. Instead of putting restrictions around the forum, they should be forever banned from signature campaigns. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: erikalui on April 19, 2015, 02:24:25 PM Your logic doesn't make sense. It won't stop spamming at all. It actually encourages it. Should we not encourage people getting into meaningful conversations but instead just pay them to make one spam comment in as many different threads as they can because that's what will happen? Clamp down on actual spammers not just people who get into a conversation or discussion in a thread. I believe in prevention being better than cure but your logic is that you need to stop spammers rather than preventing them from spamming. So well it's like wait till they spam and then ban them but in this way, the campaign's reputation suffers saying that it has a lot of spammers. Not exactly sure if a signature gets benefited by having the same user posting over 20-30 replies in the same thread. For you and me, the meaning of having an interesting conversation might be different. Title: Re: [BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion Post by: hilariousandco on April 19, 2015, 02:37:09 PM Your logic doesn't make sense. It won't stop spamming at all. It actually encourages it. Should we not encourage people getting into meaningful conversations but instead just pay them to make one spam comment in as many different threads as they can because that's what will happen? Clamp down on actual spammers not just people who get into a conversation or discussion in a thread. I believe in prevention being better than cure but your logic is that you need to stop spammers rather than preventing them from spamming. So well it's like wait till they spam and then ban them but in this way, the campaign's reputation suffers saying that it has a lot of spammers. No it isn't. If you read what I said you would see I suggested doing both. When people sign up check their posts - if they're crap they get denied straight away. Then keep an eye on them throughout the campaign and if they start spamming warn or kick them off. Not exactly sure if a signature gets benefited by having the same user posting over 20-30 replies in the same thread. For you and me, the meaning of having an interesting conversation might be different. Are you saying each thread just needs one signature impression then advertising objective achieved? Not at all. The ads actually work better when there's several, just don't pay people to make poor posts, pay them to make quality ones and not the opposite as you're suggesting. |
