 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
|
How to run the linux version?
|
|
|
|
Hello,
admin, Is there any more public node to connect? My wallet said only 3 peers be connected, It seems that there is a little less. I have a public vps,but its OS is ubuntu16.04, cannot run F1C windows daemon.
Open your ports !  My network service provider cannot provide me with a public network ip address. My pc communicates with the public network through the NAT of the router.So opening my pc port can't solve the problem. I think this problem is widespread in China's broadband network. Please ， admin help to consider placing more nodes on the public network to facilitate Chinese miners to join the mining.
Hello,
admin, Is there any more public node to connect? My wallet said only 3 peers be connected, It seems that there is a little less. I have a public vps,but its OS is ubuntu16.04, cannot run F1C windows daemon.
Open your ports ! My network service provider cannot provide me with a public network ip address. My pc communicates with the public network through the NAT of the router.So opening my pc port can't solve the problem. I think this problem is widespread in China's broadband network. Please ， admin help to consider placing more nodes on the public network to facilitate Chinese miners to join the mining. Now my wallet said have 6 peers connected, its great, maybe somebody who have public ip open his port |
|
|
|
|
Hello,
admin, Is there any more public node to connect? My wallet said only 3 peers be connected, It seems that there is a little less. I have a public vps,but its OS is ubuntu16.04, cannot run F1C windows daemon.
|
|
|
|
Problem: crash when running version 0.5.2 or later version
Rig: windows10 6 x vega64 (Samsung MEM) amd driver: 19.4.3
When running TRM 0.5.2 (or later version), rig crashed and said error "POSIX..."
When running TRM 0.5.1, It is normal.
What is the problem of my rig?
You really think that you wrote enough info? You even didn't point what algo you mine... CNR, CNV8_UPX2 |
|
|
|
|
Problem: crash when running version 0.5.2 or later version
Rig: windows10 6 x vega64 (Samsung MEM) amd driver: 19.4.3
When running TRM 0.5.2 (or later version), rig crashed and said error "POSIX..."
When running TRM 0.5.1, It is normal.
What is the problem of my rig?
|
|
|
|
|
@todxx, Hello, When will TRM support turtle's new algo "chukwa" and loki's new algo "RandmXL"?
|
|
|
|
|
@doktor83, Hello, When will SRBminer support turtle's new algo "chukwa" and loki's new algo "RandmXL"?
|
|
|
|
.....
Hello mate, very appreciate for your guiding. Unfortunately, I set the core 1300mhz and mem 975mhz and voltage below 820mv, then vega does not work, it is easy to crash. @netmebtc I can't do <850mV voltage either for my Vega56s even though my settings and ppt tables are the same. Think this has something to do with the temperature are cards are running at. Like yours, my cards run at temp >60C. Just think this might be the reason why we can't run at lower voltages. This is also the reason why the mem tweak settings don't work on my cards either. Setting my REF higher than the default value will crash my cards. Did you make sure to disable all other powertstates in Overdriventool except P5? If you flash a Vega 64 BIOS you will also get a higher voltage to the HBM adding stability. [/quote] I done it. I just change the SOC clock to 1028Mhz, and set voltage to 810mv, then all vegas working normal. GPU_P0=852;800;0 GPU_P1=991;800;0 GPU_P2=1084;800;0 GPU_P3=1138;800;0 GPU_P4=1150;800;0 GPU_P5=1202;800;0 GPU_P6=1212;810;0 GPU_P7=1337;810 Mem_P0=167;800;0 Mem_P1=500;800;0 Mem_P2=800;810;0 Mem_P3=975;810 Mem_TimingLevel=0 Fan_P0=30;11 Fan_P1=50;12 Fan_P2=55;25 Fan_P3=63;48 Fan_P4=75;78 Fan_ZeroRPM=0 Fan_Acoustic=2400 Power_Target=0 But with these setting, the power consumption on wall is still too high at 1400w, It seems that only lower the core clock could lower the power consumption. By the way ,I have not used AMD Memory Tweak tool |
|
|
|
Hello everyone, I have 6 vega64 (Samsung memory) rig windows10 18.5.1drive, core 1408/900mv, mem 1100/900mv, when I use the 0.5.2 version to mine XMR, each card can reach 2.4Kh, the wall power consumption of the whole machine is 1800 watts. Except for the power consumption of the motherboard of 200 watts, the average power consumption of a vega64 reaches 267w. Is this power consumption normal?
Is there a way to reduce the power consumption of vega to less than 185w, even if it is a little less than 2.4kh?
That power use is very high. Undervolt. Power table mod. All the usualy things people do. Read a bit more of the thread and you will get plenty of ideas I do some undervolt and ppt moding . set cclock to 1100/860mv mclock 1100/860mv , I got the 1450w power consumption at wall and 11.7Kh mining cnR running trm 0.5.2 with cn_config 15*14:AAA [2019-06-30 17:39:10] Mining cnr with 6 GPU workers [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 0 (06:00.0) 64 CUs Temp 63C Fan 49.00% (2408 RPM) Core 1062 MHz Mem 1100 MHz, VDDC 862.0 mV [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 1 (19:00.0) 64 CUs Temp 63C Fan 49.00% (2446 RPM) Core 1058 MHz Mem 1100 MHz, VDDC 862.0 mV [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 2 (13:00.0) 64 CUs Temp 51C Fan 58.00% (2874 RPM) Core 1055 MHz Mem 1100 MHz, VDDC 862.0 mV [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 3 (16:00.0) 64 CUs Temp 63C Fan 52.00% (2575 RPM) Core 1053 MHz Mem 1100 MHz, VDDC 862.0 mV [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 4 (03:00.0) 64 CUs Temp 62C Fan 56.00% (2788 RPM) Core 1069 MHz Mem 1100 MHz, VDDC 862.0 mV [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 5 (09:00.0) 64 CUs Temp 62C Fan 53.00% (2599 RPM) Core 1040 MHz Mem 1100 MHz, VDDC 862.0 mV [2019-06-30 17:39:10] [2019-06-30 17:39:10] Current CN configs: [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 0 15*14:AAA [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 1 15*14:AAA [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 2 15*14:AAA [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 3 15*14:AAA [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 4 15*14:AAA [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 5 15*14:AAA [2019-06-30 17:39:10] [2019-06-30 17:39:10] Stats Uptime: 0 days, 00:16:53 [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 0 [63C, fan 49%] cnr: 1.951kh/s, avg 1.951kh/s, pool 2.388kh/s a:24 r:0 hw:0 [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 1 [63C, fan 49%] cnr: 1.949kh/s, avg 1.950kh/s, pool 1.393kh/s a:14 r:0 hw:0 [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 2 [51C, fan 58%] cnr: 1.937kh/s, avg 1.945kh/s, pool 2.290kh/s a:23 r:0 hw:0 [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 3 [63C, fan 52%] cnr: 1.939kh/s, avg 1.942kh/s, pool 1.892kh/s a:19 r:0 hw:0 [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 4 [62C, fan 56%] cnr: 1.957kh/s, avg 1.962kh/s, pool 2.191kh/s a:22 r:0 hw:0 [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 5 [62C, fan 53%] cnr: 1.928kh/s, avg 1.927kh/s, pool 2.388kh/s a:24 r:0 hw:0 [2019-06-30 17:39:10] Total cnr: 11.66kh/s, avg 11.68kh/s, pool 12.54kh/s a:126 r:0 hw:0 I modified the PPT with the registry. GPU_P0=852;800 GPU_P1=991;810 GPU_P2=1084;820 GPU_P3=1138;830 GPU_P4=1150;840 GPU_P5=1202;850 GPU_P6=1212;850 GPU_P7=1100;860 Mem_P0=167;800 Mem_P1=500;800 Mem_P2=800;810 Mem_P3=1100;860 Fan_Min=1588 Fan_Max=4900 Fan_Target=63 Fan_Acoustic=2400 Power_Temp=75 Power_Target=0 The above parameters I have been through a number of tests, found a relatively stable data, if the voltage is set below 860mv, some cards will randomly appear crash How can I further optimize and reduce the power consumption to 1200w? If you are running the core at such so low frequency you should be able to lower the vcore to 810-820, but only if you also lower your HBM to 1028MHz or less. The reason is that the SOC will need more voltage, ie 860mV at 1107MHz than at 1028MHz. And the SOC frequency always needs to be higher or the same as the HBM. These are my settings for 4 Vega 56 pulling 650w from the wall:  Hello mate, very appreciate for your guiding. Unfortunately, I set the core 1300mhz and mem 975mhz and voltage below 820mv, then vega does not work, it is easy to crash. |
|
|
|
Hello everyone, I have 6 vega64 (Samsung memory) rig windows10 18.5.1drive, core 1408/900mv, mem 1100/900mv, when I use the 0.5.2 version to mine XMR, each card can reach 2.4Kh, the wall power consumption of the whole machine is 1800 watts. Except for the power consumption of the motherboard of 200 watts, the average power consumption of a vega64 reaches 267w. Is this power consumption normal?
Is there a way to reduce the power consumption of vega to less than 185w, even if it is a little less than 2.4kh?
That power use is very high. Undervolt. Power table mod. All the usualy things people do. Read a bit more of the thread and you will get plenty of ideas I do some undervolt and ppt moding . set cclock to 1100/860mv mclock 1100/860mv , I got the 1450w power consumption at wall and 11.7Kh mining cnR running trm 0.5.2 with cn_config 15*14:AAA [2019-06-30 17:39:10] Mining cnr with 6 GPU workers [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 0 (06:00.0) 64 CUs Temp 63C Fan 49.00% (2408 RPM) Core 1062 MHz Mem 1100 MHz, VDDC 862.0 mV [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 1 (19:00.0) 64 CUs Temp 63C Fan 49.00% (2446 RPM) Core 1058 MHz Mem 1100 MHz, VDDC 862.0 mV [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 2 (13:00.0) 64 CUs Temp 51C Fan 58.00% (2874 RPM) Core 1055 MHz Mem 1100 MHz, VDDC 862.0 mV [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 3 (16:00.0) 64 CUs Temp 63C Fan 52.00% (2575 RPM) Core 1053 MHz Mem 1100 MHz, VDDC 862.0 mV [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 4 (03:00.0) 64 CUs Temp 62C Fan 56.00% (2788 RPM) Core 1069 MHz Mem 1100 MHz, VDDC 862.0 mV [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 5 (09:00.0) 64 CUs Temp 62C Fan 53.00% (2599 RPM) Core 1040 MHz Mem 1100 MHz, VDDC 862.0 mV [2019-06-30 17:39:10] [2019-06-30 17:39:10] Current CN configs: [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 0 15*14:AAA [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 1 15*14:AAA [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 2 15*14:AAA [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 3 15*14:AAA [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 4 15*14:AAA [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 5 15*14:AAA [2019-06-30 17:39:10] [2019-06-30 17:39:10] Stats Uptime: 0 days, 00:16:53 [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 0 [63C, fan 49%] cnr: 1.951kh/s, avg 1.951kh/s, pool 2.388kh/s a:24 r:0 hw:0 [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 1 [63C, fan 49%] cnr: 1.949kh/s, avg 1.950kh/s, pool 1.393kh/s a:14 r:0 hw:0 [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 2 [51C, fan 58%] cnr: 1.937kh/s, avg 1.945kh/s, pool 2.290kh/s a:23 r:0 hw:0 [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 3 [63C, fan 52%] cnr: 1.939kh/s, avg 1.942kh/s, pool 1.892kh/s a:19 r:0 hw:0 [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 4 [62C, fan 56%] cnr: 1.957kh/s, avg 1.962kh/s, pool 2.191kh/s a:22 r:0 hw:0 [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 5 [62C, fan 53%] cnr: 1.928kh/s, avg 1.927kh/s, pool 2.388kh/s a:24 r:0 hw:0 [2019-06-30 17:39:10] Total cnr: 11.66kh/s, avg 11.68kh/s, pool 12.54kh/s a:126 r:0 hw:0 I modified the PPT with the registry. GPU_P0=852;800 GPU_P1=991;810 GPU_P2=1084;820 GPU_P3=1138;830 GPU_P4=1150;840 GPU_P5=1202;850 GPU_P6=1212;850 GPU_P7=1100;860 Mem_P0=167;800 Mem_P1=500;800 Mem_P2=800;810 Mem_P3=1100;860 Fan_Min=1588 Fan_Max=4900 Fan_Target=63 Fan_Acoustic=2400 Power_Temp=75 Power_Target=0 The above parameters I have been through a number of tests, found a relatively stable data, if the voltage is set below 860mv, some cards will randomly appear crash How can I further optimize and reduce the power consumption to 1200w? |
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone, I have 6 vega64 (Samsung memory) rig windows10 18.5.1drive, core 1408/900mv, mem 1100/900mv, when I use the 0.5.2 version to mine XMR, each card can reach 2.4Kh, the wall power consumption of the whole machine is 1800 watts. Except for the power consumption of the motherboard of 200 watts, the average power consumption of a vega64 reaches 267w. Is this power consumption normal?
Is there a way to reduce the power consumption of vega to less than 185w, even if it is a little less than 2.4kh?
|
|
|
|
Hey,Guy，
The 0.5.2 DEV donation has a big problem. I ran 4 vega machines last night. Today I found that only one is connected to xmr pool(minexmr.com). The other three are running normally from software window showing, but I don’t know what pool they are connectting to.The pool went, I guess it is connected to your dev pool, donated for about 6 hours, It is very terrible!
Can you please post a snippet of the output/log from one of these machines? What makes you think that the miner was not connected to the pool if it was running normally? The miner does not switch between dev and user pools, they are both run at the same time. If the user pool connection cannot be established for any reason, all mining stops. The miner prints the name of the connected pool for every share that is submitted to the user pool, so it should be easily visible from the log which pool it is connected to. (Also we currently only support one user pool, so not much of an option there) q:What makes you think that the miner was not connected to the pool if it was running normally? a:Just a geuss . Because I can only look one mechine worker on minexmr.com,and other mechine is offline for 6 hours. `The miner prints the name of the connected pool for every share that is submitted to the user pool, `---Yes I'm sure all the print is corect ,but minexmr.com showing that they are offline for 6 hours, So Maybe I guess is your problem, or maybe is pool's problem. I have restarted all mechine. Continue to observe and see if this problem will reappear |
|
|
|
|
const uint64_t DIFFICULTY_TARGET = 30; // seconds
const uint64_t EXPECTED_NUMBER_OF_BLOCKS_PER_DAY = 24 * 60 * 60 / DIFFICULTY_TARGET;
One day can be mined blocks: 24 * 60 * 60 / DIFFICULTY_TARGET = 2880 block
One day can be mined SPC: 2880*0.00036=1.0368
One year can be mined 378.432
100mil can be mined for 100000000/378.432 = 264248.2665313716 years
What a great joke coin!hehe...
|
|
|
|
Number of coins: 100000000 ? 10mil or 100mil  |
|
|
|
|
Current height is 14139 and total mined amount is 14139*0.0036=5.09004
hehe，Very funny， sperm,sperm, tinny boy go go go...
|
|
|
|
|
Hey guy
One block reward is 0.0004 SPC? What a tinny reward,Is it a joke？
|
|
|
|
|
Hey,Guy，
The 0.5.2 DEV donation has a big problem. I ran 4 vega machines last night. Today I found that only one is connected to xmr pool(minexmr.com). The other three are running normally from software window showing, but I don’t know what pool they are connectting to.The pool went, I guess it is connected to your dev pool, donated for about 6 hours, It is very terrible!
|
|
|
|
Hey, upx2 algo,my 2 vegas machine run unstable. often stuck  |
|
|
|
|
