Kesuksesan dalam trading bergantung pada kemampuan trader untuk mengelola emosi mereka dengan baik. Misalnya, ketika pasar bergerak melawan posisi mereka, trader yang tidak memiliki kendali emosional yang baik mungkin cenderung panik dan keluar dari posisi terlalu cepat, sehingga mencegah mereka mendapatkan potensi keuntungan yang lebih besar jika mereka tetap sabar. Selain itu, keserakahan dapat mendorong trader untuk mengambil risiko yang tidak perlu atau melampaui batas toleransi risiko mereka.

Dalam konsep "1%" penekanan diberikan pada pentingnya mengembangkan keterampilan psikologis yang diperlukan untuk menghadapi tekanan emosional, mengendalikan impuls perdagangan, dan tetap tenang dalam situasi yang sulit. Meskipun pemahaman tentang aspek teknis perdagangan penting, faktor psikologis memiliki dampak yang jauh lebih besar.

I don't agree with the tittle,most of the case is that if you don't have knowledge you're money would be wasted,because you are always get failed result from different types of strategy to earn money because you don't have knowledge,but if you have knowledge even if you only have small amount of money you can use the knowledge to earn money.

I don't think there is a specific period for trading and this period is good as well to buy and invest. Now that Bitcoin is still wavering to go up, it is the best time to invest. OP if nothing is lost then why companies fold up and some even removed workers from the companies. There is risk in Bitcoin and with that in the process one might loss coins if care is not taking.

If anyone is buying Bitcoin now and store it for years to come even just two years and if the person buy  and store enough before 2026, the person will make enough benefits from the investment. According to the op topic the best time is now and do not procrastination again, put your dreams I'm action so that you will be smiling when the price finally rise to the peaks.

Generally I believe that people are getting better at managing their portfolio and not letting the market play with them emotionally. I think I only speak for this community based on what I see in how people post. It's a lot less "is this the end?" Or "will bitcoin recover?" And a lot more DCA and buy the dip enthusiasm, which is definitely the right way to go. It's nice to see!

In my opinion, it is unlikely that everyday transactions will predominantly occur on-chain. Most on-chain transactions will likely be conducted by large institutions that will contribute to second layer solutions. In situations where there is a high transaction volume, priority will probably be given to big companies most of the time. Conversely, during periods of low volume, regular individuals can consolidate their inputs and the like.

This is merely speculation. I cannot accurately predict what will happen, I'm just guessing. What I do know for certain is that a future where every single transaction is conducted on-chain is just illusory dream. I agree that 1 MB isn't much, but the same can be said for limits such as 4, 8, 16, or 32 MB in the long run. There are still inherent issues that prevent widespread adoption. Point of sale transactions, for instance, remain vulnerable to double-spending compared to second layer solutions. Transaction fees continue to pose a problem, though somewhat alleviated. Also, security is compromised as miners gain a time advantage during block propagation, and there's also the concern of limited disk space.

I would suggest you to find a job and not comment on nonsense.

You probably don't read all answers and just collect activity points


Please don't hang on words. I am an expert, but in marketing, not crypto trading. I don't trust blindly, as I said statistics are confirmed. Do you think that the most popular crypto exchange is lying?


I'm not going to share any screenshots here because they will immediately be stolen and used to scam people.

People are sure about the return from an investment. However we were able to experience massive losses on some occasions which were completely unexpected. So, investment too kind of gamble. You'll invest today with the expectation to eat tomorrow, but you won't get the food. In such situation what can be done. For two days you weren't able to feed yourself, the next day your mind won't function perfectly to analyse the market. So, the importance of food is high than an investment.

I think it's usually useless to debate motivations: either it's unambiguous, in which case there is no debate... or it's not and there will be no resolution.  Ultimately what matters is what people do, not what motivates them.  If something is explainable as confusion or benign greed, it's prudent to stick with that assumption until facts show otherwise both because it's more likely to be true but also because it has less collateral damage if you're wrong.

As far as the quote--  Your guess is as good as mine as to the intended tone, it's probably a mistake to assume much about it.  It can be extremely difficult to figure out the correct tone from text,  something I know all too well as someone who writes messages intended to sound playful but get received by many as a particularly forceful sermon.  

That said, It's easy to be popular with almost any identifiable clique:  Just yell the party lines louder than other people, hate on the right enemies, cheer on the right heros.  So much so that excessive popularity with an identifiable group can be a red-flag:  People who are genuine will usually have some unpopular opinions, they'll usually have better things to do with their time than sing from the hymn book all day long.   Bitcoin and the adjacent altcoin ecosystems have been full of bad actors using the popularity play book: Even early on many of the top rated OTC participants were scammers.  Plenty of loud twitter voices promoting Bitcoin turned out to only doing it to form a following to sell their scamcoin to... even Craig Wright totally suckered a big swath of large block bitcoiners[1] by saying what they wanted to hear. ([1] whom I disagreed with, but at least the general position was one a (confused) person could honestly adopt... not a con, but Wright managed to turn many people into con-co-conspirators by playing to their biases)

This isn't to say that disagreeable people are more trustworthy,  I think the compulsively disagreeable are even more likely to be bad actors.  There really just isn't a magic formula to figure out good motivations from bad.  But we don't have to-- unless you're shopping for a spouse you don't need to worry about judging people, just consider their actions and your responses.

gambling managed in a mathematical / smart-way becomes a stable and profitable activity like trading.

only problem, to manage the typical variables of this activity you must have an "hedge". this will affect the profit and deserve a lot of research in some cases. you have two choices, risk a larger amount of money or trying to collect just a small profit.

With term "gambling" I always talk about bets related to sport and not to "casino" games in which it is practically always certain that the house manages to win in the long term...

Basically everything in life is gambling, what happens to your life the next day? it is also still taboo or gambling. The business we do can also be said to be gambling because we don't know what will happen. So we have to plan everything well.