Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 01:25:42 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 »
1  Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Ukyo.Loan - Paying 0.05% daily. on: April 21, 2014, 06:57:50 PM
Indeed the claim system was stuck by the bitcoind server.

Should be working just fine now.
I also added a bitcoind status message for future reference and setup a notification system.

Thanks for your patience,
Ukyo

Error: The signature provided did not work. Please try again.

Don't know what to do ! Cheesy

Bitcoind again manually confirmed that the signature you attempted to use did not validate for your address.
Please be sure to follow the instructions and copy and paste the requested phrase.
2  Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Ukyo.Loan - Paying 0.05% daily. on: April 21, 2014, 05:00:29 PM
Indeed the claim system was stuck by the bitcoind server.

Should be working just fine now.
I also added a bitcoind status message for future reference and setup a notification system.

Thanks for your patience,
Ukyo
3  Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Ukyo.Loan - Paying 0.05% daily. on: April 04, 2014, 02:54:41 AM
Hello everyone.

If you have Ukyo.Loan shares, you can claim them at https://loan.weexchange.co/claim
There is also a discussion board there where updates will be posted.

Thank you for your continued patience,
Ukyo
4  Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Ukyo.Loan - Paying 0.05% daily. on: January 25, 2014, 02:44:27 AM
Expect the coins to be gone. It is highly improbable that Ukyo will honor the terms of the loan as he has shown criminal behavior, and borderline mental illness in his attempts rationalize his behavior.

Look at the facts:

1) Ukyo lied about all the coins that were being deposited to WeExchange being unavailable due to a technical error.

2) Ukyo owes millions of dollars of BTC to users who deposited to WeExchange and has not given any reason beyond 'the coins are gone'.

3) Ukyo continued to accept deposits to WeExchange for over 2 months, knowing fully that we has unable to let anyone withdraw the BTC they deposited.

I think it is safe to say after reading 1000s of posts on the subjects that it is most likely that Ukyo treated deposits to WeExchange as his own personal wallet. He then made some gambling investments that blew up in his face at lost all the money.  He lost money on Labcoin, Active Mining, and likely sold BTC into cash thinking that the high of $260 was a good time to sell, when in reality , it is probably never going back to this figure again. Of course I can't say I'm 100% -- the only person who knows is Ukyo and he is conveniently not telling. Which should be a red flag.

He is thief and what he did was not only unbelievably stupid, it was just plain illegal.  It is not even a matter of factors out of his control, he simply stole and lost millions of users' money. It is quite the mess.  

If you are going go the route of legal action the good news is his identity is known.  The bad news is a) legal action is expensive  b) it is unlikely to recover much funds as he likely lost much of them.  At the least though it would be satisfying to see him criminally charged, forced into bankruptcy, and have to tell us (finally) in a court of law what he actually did.

He's been buying for time now for 2.5 months, but it looks like finally people are starting to realize that they've been ripped off, and the house of cards is starting to crumble.

Stop trolling.

1. Incorrect
2. This is not supportive of your claims.
3. Incorrect

You forgot to mention:
4. Ukyo has not dissapeared
5. Ukyo distributed proportionally funds that were able to be made available
6. Ukyo is clearly working towards gathering BTC at _least_ from ActM shares to be able to distribute to users also


I had about 400btc of my personal funds tied up in the listed assets.
Somehow that does not amount to the total of the issue.
5  Economy / Securities / Re: [Weexchange issue] The fall of Ukyo III - Updates and references on: January 25, 2014, 02:35:55 AM
No, it's not Ken's job to distribute the coin.

What he has said is that he is using Company and Corporate law to declare lien upon Ukyo's ACtM shares. Ukyo has accepted all the shares should be sold. Ken has also said he is selling the shares to recover ACtM losses and according to the laws of lien he is entitled to recover only ACtM's losses and costs. Any surplus (shares or BTC) will be handed over to a third party I would assume. Ken does not have the time to organise distribution himself.

Edit - he has taken legal advice on this so is following that advice.

That's all I'm going to say on this on this thread, if you want to keep checking the ACtM thread for updates please do.


To be clear, he said he is using Company and Corporate law (as referenced by his India Corporation book) which he considers as legal advice.

On another note, Ukyo (me) has been trying to get access to sell the shares since early December to be able to distribute funds to weex users when other funds were distributed.
6  Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Moving Forward/Resolution Process on: January 25, 2014, 02:29:51 AM

I think if ukyo didnt pay me back in 2 months im sure his "plan" didnt work and i will go the court way... This amount of time surely should be enough to code his solution or whatever he does. If the timeframe went by then im sure he cant solve it.


The things I am working on are not primarily code. That, as you said, would be fast and easy and something solely reliant on my efforts which means I could fulyl control how fast that could happen.
This issue is that we are working with others who have their own schedules and have a todo list that mostly requires previous steps completed before moving onto the next.

And no, Graet is not an owner, just a Director.
7  Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Moving Forward/Resolution Process on: January 25, 2014, 02:27:03 AM
Investing it into ACtM was illegal but a decent bet - as we now see.

Gambling the rest of it on the markets was very very stupid and also illegal.

Multimillion dollar fraud only ends one way - Jail.

That's why you will never see Uyko again if he gets his hands on these shares. Not unless you visit Mexico.

Again, I have no interests in "running away".
If I was going to do that I would have a long time ago.
8  Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Moving Forward/Resolution Process on: January 25, 2014, 02:25:42 AM
Ukyo sold the coins on an exchange at what he thought was the top of the market back in October. I've posted on the 'Fall of Uyko' thread about this today. He planned to buy back all the coins plus more for himself at a lower price than he sold for. It was a big big gamble with someone elses money.

Ukyo did no such thing.
9  Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] G.ASICMINER-PT on: January 24, 2014, 12:30:10 PM
Hey Ukyo,

on https://amclaims.weexchange.co/ it still says that an update will be posted on or around the 20th. I would like to transfer to Havelock. Are you going to open the Claim Portal again?

Thanks!

Hey there,

Per my post a few days ago, I was hoping for a response from FriedCat.
He has the list of remaining shareholders and I want to say he is now taking the remaining few shares worth of claims.

You can email him at fnnirvana@gmail.com and include the following:
Your email address on bitfunder (Best to send from this address)
Your public bitfunder btc address
And a signed message from that address

I think that should be enough.

If he decides he does not want to handle the confirmation part then as I mentioned before I will reopen the claim portal for the last few stragglers.

If he has any issues with you not being on the list, PM me and I can check it and your BF history to check things.

-Ukyo
10  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 24, 2014, 12:24:20 PM
Where exactly are those BTC today?

That has been beaten to death already, and in the proper thread.

If you wish to beat it some more, please do it where it is related.

I am here talking about ActM relating issues.

It is not a matter of trying to push off the question, it's the same answer as repeated over and over, and I will be happy to repeat it again to you in the correct thread.
11  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 24, 2014, 11:26:24 AM
First of all, there are laws against preferential payments.
No one user of weex should get paid off before others.

Stop bullshitting.

You cannot payback your customers/creditors and this means you are bankrupt and your assets should be liquidated. You are stalling this process to pocket money that belongs to other people. There are laws against that.

Umm, you should read any of my last posts.
I am not sure what it is you are suggesting I am trying to stall or postpone.
I am trying to make something happen.
You know..  liquidate some assets ? I like that idea. I agree with you.

I am glad you agree with me and what I am trying to accomplish.
12  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 24, 2014, 10:18:44 AM
To be clear once again because no one is listening:

First of all, there are laws against preferential payments.
No one user of weex should get paid off before others.

Secondly:
All I am trying to do is sell my shares of ActM to pay off some of Weex debt.
You are correct.

You said I am desperate.
You are correct. I am desperately working towards any and all situations that would allow me to make good on debts.
If I was not, then I would not be trying and would definitely be a scammer like TF or LabCoin who chose to disappear.

I have not gone to Vegas. Smiley

If I had access to other peoples BTC it would be dispersed just like the previous amounts.
That is the goal I am trying to achieve with ActM.
13  Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Moving Forward/Resolution Process on: January 24, 2014, 07:41:47 AM
Except that the keys were not lost.
14  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 24, 2014, 07:40:21 AM

+1

Maybe Ken should set up an "ActM Claims Portal" and let Ukyo withdraw a few Satoshis...


Just trying to do what people ask and give out money.
I apologize for trying.
15  Economy / Securities / Re: [Weexchange issue] The fall of Ukyo III - Updates and references on: January 24, 2014, 06:55:31 AM
until ukyo comes clean about what happened to the coins I will assume he stole them.  there can be no legal reason for keeping this info secret. he is merely trying to dodge the consequences. most likely he ran his business like a gambler, playing with our money and losing while trying to buy time and hedge his bets, until BF went down and his source of gambling money dried up and now hes cornered and empty handed.

even when there are legal gag-orders or strategic business related reasons to with hold info, you can still give vague descriptions of the situation. The press does it all the time. Ukyo is obviously hiding something. user virtualspade found a good lawyer versed in digital law and familiar with the bitcoin ecosystem. He is working on the labcoin scam right now. I suggest class-action here guys. Others have already placed liens on some of ukyo's properties to recoup losses, get in there before there is truly nothing left.

That is a very amusing scenario you have dreamed up.
If that was the case though, I would probably have chosen to not close BF knowing all of this and use the hundreds of btc of monthly would be profits to cover any losses. BitFunder was only growing.

Sorry to put a snag in your dreams.
16  Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Moving Forward/Resolution Process on: January 24, 2014, 06:51:33 AM
Yeah, selling your house and car and get a loan will also help.

Glad to know we both agree I am on the right track with ActM then. Smiley
17  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 24, 2014, 06:50:11 AM
@Uyko:

dude you disappear with funds that don't belong to you for MONTHS with no plausible explanation whatsoever as to what happened to OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY and then you have the nerve to come in here and troll?

gimme a fucken break. At least here you know where your shit is and that it still exists… you cannot say the same to other people.

You've got quite a mess to clean up. I suggest you GTFO of here and look somewhere else to do that job. Stop side stepping the issue.
]]

A. I did not disappear. You are mistaken.

B. There is a difference between trolling and stating facts. I have stated facts.

C. I am cleaning up the mess. That is why I am here fighting for BTC to pay out to those users.
18  Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Moving Forward/Resolution Process on: January 24, 2014, 05:43:38 AM
Ukyo what has active mining have to do, at all, with someone, like myself, who deposited money to wexchange then could not withdraw the btc.   How can you conflate these two things?  There is no link that I can see.

You can't just accept deposits from people then keep their money  (...like do I really need to describe this to you? Apparently).  What you have done is called thievery and there are repercussions.

Your information is public, you will not be able to hide from this.

Uh. Really?

Do you not want me to continue to try to sell ActM shares so you can receive some BTC from it?
I thought you were demanding BTC and didn't care where it came from even if its my personal.
Perhaps I should stop "conflating" these two things.
19  Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] G.ASICMINER-PT on: January 24, 2014, 04:19:29 AM
I am going to write an update message to FriedCat about the missing divs and about TF's shares.

I hope this can be resolved soon.
20  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 24, 2014, 04:11:37 AM
Just throwing this out there. But whoever is buying shares on Crypto Trade right now is basically giving Ukyo a premium for his shares. $8 a pop. Now honestly, I think Ken should put Ukyo's shares on some lockdown until Ukyo pays Ken or they work out some other civilized agreement. From that point forward Ukyo should have full access to his remaining shares to do with as he pleases.

Ken doesn't need to spend anymore time on this issue. Why fight over 106 BTC when he believes (a lot of people on this thread believe) that there is a bigger fish in the pond (getting these chips made; sold and mining)

Actually you are quite right.
I sent Ken a PM about this a few minutes ago with a potential way to resolve everything and make weex users very happy.
I think it would be a great outcome for everyone.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!