Service is still available. PM sent.

Logo has been delivered to babo.

The free logo offer has been claimed by babo. With this the free offer no longer exists. Any logo creation henceforth will cost a minimum of $25 up to $150 based on design elements. There is however a new offer for signatures. Till January 05, 2020 the cost for creating a signature set is $35 after which price will by $50. Do note that any slight modifications or corrections in signature designs in the future will be done with no additional cost.

I've PM'd you for more details. I would be starting the work on the 26th and delivering by the 27th.

It is the mindset more than the education that plays a role in decision making. If for example a senior politician say something, the others in the same party agree to it even if they do not. Legalizing crypto currency or not, India has already embraced the technology behind it.

Signature design has been delivered to cryptoaddictchie.



The offer for free logo is still open.

The free signature has been claimed by cryptoaddictchie and will be delivered in the next 24 hours.

The free logo offer is still open.

Yes, PM me your requirement in detail of the logo or the signature set.

Looks like no one is interested in a free logo / signature design set. The offer is still open if anyone is interested.

There was news about introducing a law on cryptocurrency in the Parliament's winter session. Not sure what happened or is happening on that front?

It does matter to an advertiser more since no advertiser would want 1 individual posing as multiple individuals. Why does it not get to you that there is no need for multiple accounts for things you can do with 1 account. You seem to ignore this completely. Campaign managers are not against any forum rules. If a campaign wants only 10 individuals of a particular rank, what is the point when 1 individual fills all the 10 positions available? Why are you ignoring the fact that joining a campaign with multiple accounts is UNETHICAL? No one would give a negative trust if the campaign allows multiple account usage. Negative trust is a must if a user joins with multiple accounts when the campaign does not allow. Even if the campaign allows multiple accounts, I would still say that joining a bounty campaign with multiple accounts is unethical. Give a genuine reason what you are trying to prove by joining a bounty campaign with multiple accounts. An user who joins a bounty campaign with multiple accounts when he/she is not supposed to as per the campaign rules can be tagged as a scammer. Don't bring in forum rules here. It has nothing to do with bounty campaigns. Its simple. If you are paid to post as 1 user, follow and post as per the rules of the person paying you. If you don't agree to the campaign rules, you are free to not join the campaign. You want to get paid more so you want to scam the bounty campaign with multiple accounts. What is wrong in tagging with a negative trust for such scams?

Neither users nor bounty managers are owners of the forum. Bounty threads are managed by bounty managers on behalf of the respective coin/token owners. The bounty campaign rules are put forth by the respective coin/token owners or the campaign manager approved by the respective coin/token owners and has nothing to do with the Bitcointalk forum, the rules of the forum or the owner of the forum. Since an user participating in a bounty campaign is paid for his/her participation, it is only ethical if the user follows all the rules of the campaign. Just because an user is allowed to create multiple accounts does not mean he/she can use this liberty to cheat (SCAM) bounty campaigns. Why is there a need to enter a bounty campaign with multiple accounts when you can post the same thing with 1 account? Isn't that FRAUD against the campaign owners. If an user purposely joins a bounty campaign with multiple accounts he/she definitely deserves a negative trust for scamming or trying to scam the campaign owners. Why should it be considered ethical when you are trying to scam a bounty campaign? Sure, the purpose of advertising is to show more people and you can do that with a single account. If you are going to get paid for doing something, do what the person who pays tells you to do. Its their money, their rules. Either follow it or don't join the campaign. You are not doing a favor to the campaign owners by posting with multiple accounts in the same campaign. If you are confusing this with certain programs paying a handful of people posing as hundreds of people promoting the same program in multiple places, you are wrong. That is unethical as well.

It is a meetup organized not by any commercial organization but by an exchange and one which is not p2p. Hence people will be wary to attend such meetups. There would be better participation / attendance if it were to be organized by any cryptocurrency or blockchain clubs or alliances.

Anything announced by Nithyananda shouldn't be believed at all. News like this are just for a good laugh. He is a wanted criminal and is on the run. He had claimed he purchased an island from Ecuador and formed his own country but Ecuador has denied it announcing, "Nithyananda has not been given asylum by Ecuador or has been helped by the government of Ecuador in purchasing any land or island in South America near or far from Ecuador." There are rumors that he is trying to seek asylum in Haiti or Mauritius.

To get things started, I would like to offer a logo for free to 1 user and a signature for free to another 1 user.

I had requested DireWolfM14 to be the escrow and DireWolfM14 has accepted.
This is DireWolfM14's Escrow ANN thread. I'll bear the escrow fees.

As is there are plenty of spams and plagiarism already in the forum. Tokenizing the forum would simply increase it multi fold. There is only one authority for Bitcointalk.org and that is Theymos. Hence, there is no point of extending the authority. There are quite a few other more important things to implement than something like tokenizing the forum. I vote for 'No'.

If the deal is done, why is this thread not being locked yet?

Added Bitcointalk signature design to the list of services provided

10 to 65 BTC trades per day by cash? You can't be serious. Do you have any idea how much 1 BTC is worth?

Even if the exchange does not ask for KYC, wouldn't the buyers/sellers ask for it to be on the safe side?

I thought only the 3 winners of the contest would have their designs made for the limited edition coldkeys. Glad to see the designs of all finalists are being made.