Bitcoin Forum
July 04, 2024, 06:52:42 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
101  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Megaminer - Multi pool (8 pools) / Multi Algo (>20) launcher on: August 19, 2017, 11:36:28 PM
Another tweak i use - introducing MSIAfterBurner profile changes to switch the appropriate profile (I have all NVIDIA)

e.g. In Miners i invoke EthDcrMiner64.cmd which contains the following
Code:
title %*
"C:\Program Files (x86)\MSI Afterburner\MSIAfterburner.exe" -profile1
"C:\crypto\Megaminer.new\Megaminer-3.1\Bin\Ethash-Claymore\EthDcrMiner64.exe" %*

I have profile1 for memory intensive overclock (Ethereum), and profile5 for GPU clock specific (the rest)

So i have a cminer.cmd in each allowing me to add the relevant Afterburner profile swap

Overall this affords me 10%+ additional performance without any loss of stability
Very interesting!
"Miners"-  it is directory MINERS in MM or a part some  data code in some file?
"cminer.cmd in each" - that means you have cminer.cmd file for each miner?
Can you tell us step-to -step manual how we can add this feature to MM?


In the MegaMiner/Miners directory you have a json file for each miner supported
In ClaymoreETH.json i change
Code:
"Path" : ".\\Bin\\Ethash-Claymore\\EthDcrMiner64.exe",
to
Code:
"Path" : ".\\Bin\\Ethash-Claymore\\EthDcrMiner64.cmd",

And create a new file EthDcrMiner64.cmd in
Megaminer\Bin\Ethash-Claymore with the following contents:
Code:
title %*
"C:\Program Files (x86)\MSI Afterburner\MSIAfterburner.exe" -profile1
"C:\crypto\Megaminer.new\Megaminer-3.1\Bin\Ethash-Claymore\EthDcrMiner64.exe" %*

I chose to specify the FULL directory of my installation structure so i did not depend on what directory the miner was launched from
Also check your MSI AFterburner is installed in the directory and update y our .cmd accordingly

You do this for EACH miner you are using so change ccminerAlexis78.json
Code:
"Path" : ".\\Bin\\NVIDIA-Alexis78\\ccminer.exe",
to
Code:
"Path" : ".\\Bin\\NVIDIA-Alexis78\\ccminer.cmd",
and drop a new file ccminer.cmd with the following
Code:
title %*
"C:\Program Files (x86)\MSI Afterburner\MSIAfterburner.exe" -profile5
"C:\crypto\Megaminer.new\Megaminer-3.1\Bin\NVIDIA-Alexis78\ccminer.exe" %*

Sometimes you might find another miner name - say cminer-x64.exe - be careful these match correspondingly

So each Bin/*/cminer.cmd file is slightly different according to each .exe and any other setting you might like to differentiate

Note i used profile 1 for Claymore ETH and profile 5 for ALL other miners
Thats is because Ethereum mining is know to be memory speed intensive and most other algorithms are more GPU clock sensitive - including ZCASH

In AfterBurner you save your required overclock settings to profile 1 & 5 accordingly (or any other as you like
Choosing appropriate setting for a stable rig is an art in itself - there will always be the odd poor card in a rig that can cause instability if clocked too far
It s also VERY difficult to get a stable optimal rig unless all the cards are identical, the main problem is that the settings are generally specified as OFFSETS from the norm for each card and the base can vary so +100 for 1 card means something slightly different to +100 for another. This is ESPECIALLY important for the power limit setting

I have 2 rigs and a few other stray cards:
  • 4 x 1060 GTX - 4 identical cards - i can set them the same but 1 card in particular tends to fail before the others - I have settled on
    profile 1: +500 memory, +50 for the GPU /80% power limit (cap 96W) - if was was sole ethereum mining i might choose to lower the GPU overclock to zero and possibly -ve
    profile 5: -500 memory, +50 for the GPU /80% power limit (cap 96W) - I am edging the GPU up until i lose stability and hoping to get to 150 (cap 96W)
  • 6 x 1070 GTX - this is a mess - 6 cards, 1 Gigabyte, 4 MSI (3 models), 1 Palit - the PL are all different but i have targeted a CAP of around 120W each but otherwise using similar memory/gpu clock to the 1060 rig above
  • i also have a 1080ti/1060 pair in a standalone PC and another 1070 on its own which i set accordingly, My 1080ti Caps at GPU 210 & memory is set just above +/-500

Clocking a single card is far easier than getting optimal settings for a rig - it is possible to have different settings for each card but its a pain to keep up with - i prefer mild overclock and more stability. I can get individual cards to GPU 150-200+ and memory to 650+ but then i have to pay more attention to resetting the rig/miners more often - and the power consumption starts to erode the extra revenue above a certain point - I don't have a lot of headroom on my PSU

I have 2 profiles:
5 for GPU clock focused (cminer, zecminer) , 1 for Ethereum memory focused (Claymore, ethminer) - you can use the relevant profile in each .cmd accordingly
Note that the .cmd files will not generally execute past the miner launch command as they are generally killed by Megaminer ahead of the next candidate so i choose to set the profile ahead of the miner launch and don't attempt to reset it back to "normal" after the miner completes (because it mostly doesn't)
102  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Megaminer - Multi pool (8 pools) / Multi Algo (>20) launcher on: August 19, 2017, 01:23:05 PM
Another tweak i use - introducing MSIAfterBurner profile changes to switch the appropriate profile (I have all NVIDIA)

e.g. In Miners i invoke EthDcrMiner64.cmd which contains the following
Code:
title %*
"C:\Program Files (x86)\MSI Afterburner\MSIAfterburner.exe" -profile1
"C:\crypto\Megaminer.new\Megaminer-3.1\Bin\Ethash-Claymore\EthDcrMiner64.exe" %*

I have profile1 for memory intensive overclock (Ethereum), and profile5 for GPU clock specific (the rest)

So i have a cminer.cmd in each allowing me to add the relevant Afterburner profile swap

Overall this affords me 10%+ additional performance without any loss of stability
103  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Megaminer - Multi pool (8 pools) / Multi Algo (>20) launcher on: August 19, 2017, 01:02:26 PM

I flipped the Miner list to ASCENDING profit

When running multiple pools the list of candidates easily exceeds 1 page so it scrolls off and you cant see the most important candidates - the top 10 or so

Flipping the sort to ascending allows a relatively small height with all the important info to hand

I also rolled the current miner into the historic miners, but kept Status as a sort precedent to make the list more compact

Just a proposal really - not sure its best for most but for me its invaluable


X17                              ccminerAlexis78      24.43 MH/s             0.00108   4.524 ZPOOL              24
HMQ1725                          ccminer-2.2          9.74 MH/s              0.00109   4.559 ZPOOL              42
LBRY                             ccminerAlexis78      657.63 MH/s            0.00114   4.794 ZPOOL              46
X11GOST                          ccminerAlexis78Cuda8 27.56 MH/s             0.00119   4.974 ZPOOL              33
BITCORE         bitcore          ccminer-2.2          33.03 MH/s             0.00120   5.040 YIIMP             472
X11GOST         sibcoin          ccminerAlexis78Cuda8 27.56 MH/s             0.00140   5.845 YIIMP              12
SKEIN           digibyte         ccminerAlexis78      1.16 GH/s              0.00146   6.112 MPH
SKUNK                            CcminerTpruvot       87.80 MH/s             0.00195   8.162 ZPOOL             190
SKUNK           signatum         CcminerTpruvot       87.80 MH/s             0.00227   9.530 YIIMP            1663


Time to next profit check: 11 seconds..............................

     Speed Active      Run Command
     ----- ------      --- -------
 65.13 MHs 00D 00H 27M 5 x Bin\NVIDIA-TPruvot\ccminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://yiimp.ccminer.org:8433 -u xxxxxx -p c=,ID=flash4,stats -R 10 -r 4 -a skunk
 98.71 MHs 00D 00H 07M 4 x Bin\NVIDIA-TPruvot\ccminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://yiimp.ccminer.org:8533 -u xxxxxx -p c=,ID=flash4,stats -R 10 -r 4 -a tribus
  1.22 GHs 00D 00H 26M 1 x Bin\NVIDIA-Alexis78\ccminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://us-east.hub.miningpoolhub.com:20527 -u xxx.flash4 -p x -R 10 -r 4 -a skein
  9.16 GHs 00D 00H 05M 1 x Bin\NVIDIA-Alexis78\ccminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:5766 -u xxxxxx -p c=BTC,flash4,stats -R 10 -r 4 -a blake2s
 55.64 MHs 00D 00H 01M 1 x Bin\NVIDIA-TPruvot\ccminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:8433 -u xxxxxx -p c=BTC,flash4,stats -R 10 -r 4 -a skunk
646.30 MHs 00D 00H 01M 1 x Bin\NVIDIA-Alexis78\ccminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:3334 -u xxxxxx -p c=BTC,flash4,stats -R 10 -r 4 -a lbry

104  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Megaminer - Multi pool (8 pools) / Multi Algo (>20) launcher on: August 19, 2017, 12:39:23 AM
I am using MPH, Hash Refinery, Zpool, YIIMP am an seeing the problem occasionally with NIST5, Skein & X17 and the perceived hashrate jumping up to the 17 G range (5 x 1070 - real speed should be about 2.5G) which is nearly 10 times too high

5x1070 showing X17 @ 75+M when a more realistic hash rate is around 50M (NVIDIA-Alexis78)

Each time i reset stats and it drops to appropriate levels
105  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Megaminer - Multi pool (8 pools) / Multi Algo (>20) launcher on: August 19, 2017, 12:24:27 AM
I am using MPH, Hash Refinery, Zpool, YIIMP am an seeing the problem occasionally with NIST5, Skein & X17 and the perceived hashrate jumping up to the 17 G range (5 x 1070 - real speed should be about 2.5G) which is nearly 10 times too high

My single 1070 just got "stuck" at 357M for hmq1725 - the real score is nearer 3.7M (low intensity as its my main PC)

There are no log files visible showing me the output at the time (I was away) so i can't check the parsing mistake (NVIDIA-TPruvot) on ZPOOL

106  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Megaminer - Multi pool (8 pools) / Multi Algo (>20) launcher on: August 19, 2017, 12:05:43 AM
Is there any way to prevent the continuous evaluation of hash rates for use in valuing options, rather than just the pass at the start.

I am seeing cases where one or more pool is somehow triggering an evaluation of speed that is orders of magnitude higher than it actually is

I am using MPH, Hash Refinery, Zpool, YIIMP am an seeing the problem occasionally with NIST5, Skein & X17 and the perceived hashrate jumping up to the 17 G range (5 x 1070 - real speed should be about 2.5G) which is nearly 10 times too high

Am not sure yet if it reverts to lower values and why it misinterprets the rate anyway, or whether its 1 pool that is causing the problem

At least if i had control of when it evaluated the hash rate i can visually scan them for sensible values before leaving the rig to work

v 3.1




Hmm ! Somehow ended with a SINGLE 1070 pc on neoscrypt hashing at 4.3M (NVIDIA-TPruvot) which is way over the normal rate of 8-900K
If i reset the stats cash it retests properly .. until next time !!!

I'd definitely like to turn continuous re-assessment of hash rate off until we are clear that the parsing of the output is solid
107  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Megaminer - Multi pool (8 pools) / Multi Algo (>20) launcher on: August 18, 2017, 09:31:01 PM
Is there any way to prevent the continuous evaluation of hash rates for use in valuing options, rather than just the pass at the start.

I am seeing cases where one or more pool is somehow triggering an evaluation of speed that is orders of magnitude higher than it actually is

I am using MPH, Hash Refinery, Zpool, YIIMP am an seeing the problem occasionally with NIST5, Skein & X17 and the perceived hashrate jumping up to the 17 G range (5 x 1070 - real speed should be about 2.5G) which is nearly 10 times too high

Am not sure yet if it reverts to lower values and why it misinterprets the rate anyway, or whether its 1 pool that is causing the problem

At least if i had control of when it evaluated the hash rate i can visually scan them for sensible values before leaving the rig to work

v 3.1


108  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: Z-POOL Support Thread(Unofficial) on: August 17, 2017, 10:10:02 PM
What are the typical fees incurred in collecting enough coin, exchanging and transferring back - in bulk - does anyone who runs these sort of pools have any clue to offer ?
109  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: Z-POOL Support Thread(Unofficial) on: August 17, 2017, 02:31:24 PM
Dunno if i got the right idea but just looked at my wallet mBTC column, checked the current exchange rate https://coinmarketcap.com/and multiplied my coin share by the current BTC exchange rate, expecting to get the mBTC

But its shy by 15-20%

Is this the "skim" you have spoken of

Have included a few screenshots below with some Immature and in Exchange examples

I checked a few examples also in hashrefinery and the results were within 1% - enough to be explained by small exchange rate differentials and/or pool fees

Or perhaps i don't understand how it works ?







Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!