|
Good for Tezos, it looks like last weeks there has been a progress (yeah, get rid of Gevers is a progress) and I keep my faith in the project. I expect around 2 months when we can see something.
A blockchain for the future cannot be build in few weeks, better to wait and have it working OK than something full of bugs.
|
|
|
|
|
KuCoin bonus seems to be a good idea to me, just holding some KCS are receiving tokens. Let's see if 2018 can be a good year, so far the market is too bearish and it's not easy to take conclussions.
If there is a long bullish moment new people will join to the crypto comunity and there it's when Kucoin can gain volumen again.
|
|
|
|
|
Si ya tenía mala pinta esto del Petro lo de la compra parece ya de chiste. Si es que ni un proceso fácil de compra han sabido hacer. Y luego sale Maduro diciendo que ya tienen 700 millones de dólares. A todo esto ni se sabe con claridad si funciona sobre Ethereum o sobre NEM.
A los que compráis ya iréis informando qué tal va, pero no pinta muy bien.
|
|
|
|
mmmm, no se, esto hace parte del juego, yo también he visto a muchos que se dedican a decir que los bancos son todos unos ladrones, y no veo tanto revuelo por eso.
Pues sí, no nos vamos a rasgar las vestiduras cuando hay miles de vídeos de youtubers clamando lo fácil que es hacer dinero invirtiendo en cryptos y en ICOs que están pagados directamente por compañías, para convencer a cualquiera que estuviera tranquilamente vídeos de gatitos en Youtube. En realidad, así en general, la gente del mundo crypto no es mejor gente que la gente del mundo de la banca tradicional. Lo que es diferente es la tecnología o sus posibilidades pero al final somos todos iguales, para bien y para mal. |
|
|
|
Oh man, when this community wants to do something... we get it!  Ready for new challenges!  |
|
|
|
Useless coin. No sense for crypto local coins. In a global world you can choose between bitcoin or other altcoins, but to be the coin of a place is to be close mind. Can you imagine if all the regions in the world did the same? The Basque coin, the Scottish coin, Dutch coin, the Benetto Coin, the Texas Coin, the Rhode Island coin, the Tíbet Coin, New Scotland coin..., thousands of useless shitcoins.
Useless comment. Can you imagine if all of the world desided to use Bitcoin? Then it would become impossible to pay anything, without spending thousands of dollars in fees, and it is impossible to actually fit all of the monetary transactions in a single blockchain. Also, its possible for other people in other places to accept the coin, but in real life, how many do you think accepts even Bitcoin or some of the big altcoins? There is a much bigger chance for succeeding with a local fiat currency, whether it is digital or physical. Also, you seem to ignore the fact that there will always be local currencies. Mostly because they have a higher level of trust locally, but also because one size doesn't fit all globally. So, what works in Singapore, Bangalore and Florida, doesn't necessary fit the way you do business or handle monetary transactions in Johannesburg. Or Stockholm. Or (add more places)... Imagine if you where using euros in Gambia, where a loaf of bread is around 0.15 EUR, and a 5 EUR bill could last up to a week. A montly salary can be around 50 EUR. It would require ridiculous amounts of cent coins, and the cost of producing these coins, handling them, transporting etc. would be astronomical. So, of course its smarter to have a local currency, as the buying power of individuals is really different depending on where you are located in the world. And history clearly shows that only a few global currencies have ever existed that was not commodities, while thousand of traditional local currencies have existed for thousand of years (usually lasts around a century). So, do a little readup on the history of money and commodities before dumping shitcoin comments on whatever you haven't invested in. Just my 2 satoshis anyway. Bitcoin is suppossed to solve the problems about fees with Lighting Network, so hopefully no problem that everybody uses it. Besides you can use Dash, Ethereum, Litecoin, Monero, Bitcoin Cash and many more. The thing is that in bitcoin top world developers and scientists are working on it, clearly there is a big advantage in that regarding to localcoins. Local coins for 7 million of people can't challenge global coins for 7 billion. And in Europe there was some time that each country used their own coin, and now many use Euros, that IMO is much better and make us to be part of the UE. I guess you think it's worse to have Euro in Catalonia than their own coin. And about History. It clearly shows something about coins, but the thing is that bitcoin and the rest of crypto coins are here to change that, and most of us believe in that. To change it for a better and connected world. But if you think it's better to use local coins, just prepair to travel 200km and start using AragonCoin, ValencianCoin, SpanishCoin, CerdinianCoin or RoussillonCoin. If you're happy with that, good for you. Anyway, it's always good to have different projects around, just I don't belive in localcoins, good luck! |
|
|
|
|
Anyone knows what happened with @thenagaico twitter account?
It seems they close it but I don't know if there is a new one. The thing is that there are pretty interestint news about Naga this week (card + possibility in binance) and I think it's not the best momment to mess with this.
|
|
|
|
|
Useless coin. No sense for crypto local coins. In a global world you can choose between bitcoin or other altcoins, but to be the coin of a place is to be close mind. Can you imagine if all the regions in the world did the same? The Basque coin, the Scottish coin, Dutch coin, the Benetto Coin, the Texas Coin, the Rhode Island coin, the Tíbet Coin, New Scotland coin..., thousands of useless shitcoins.
|
|
|
|
|
Pick a coin between below 300th position in coinmarketcap.
Pray.
Either you loose it all or you multiply it.
Good luck.
|
|
|
|
|
Bueno pues oye, la opinión de esa gente. Allá cada uno. El tiempo dará o quitará razones. Lo único que llamar así al conjunto de las criptomonedas "estafa" pues me parece un poco osado y me da la sensación que mucho no han investigado sobre la tecnología y las posibilidades del bitcoin/blockchain.
En mi opinión es gente que viene de la inversión tradicional y que anda un poco perdido en esto y no se entera mucho. Si además añadimos que llevan pregonando lo mismo hace años cuando BTC estaba a 100, 300, 1000, 2000 o 5000 $, pues ya simplemente es la inercia que tienen de querer que esto pete porque no invirtieron nada en su momento y ahora les da rabia.
|
|
|
|
|
Depende de cada uno, si tienes tiempo libre, no mucho que hacer, y unos 5$ semanales te parecen bien gastando un tiempo de la semana pues oye, ahí los tienes.
Yo estuve haciendo durante un par de meses pero ya lo dejé por que no me compensaba. Si pillas alguno bueno es la leche, pero si no un poco pérdida de tiempo, en mi opinión.
|
|
|
|
Polybius annoucement with the new CEO: Anton Altement from Credit Suisse. It looks like a good profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/anton-altement-9820005/We need confirmation of this person but at least there is the annoucement. Good news! Maybe the patience will be worthy  I guess PLBT coins will rise from the current 4.70$ |
|
|
|
|
No doubt eBTC, 2500 tokens that are now 1$ each..., you can imagine. I simply didn't believe until I exchanged some of them in KuCoin. Best of all that I didn't even know when I applied to that airdrop, just I realized checking my ethereum account about those tokens.
And even better that this project is still ongoing and it looks like really nice.
And this year Polymath is really nice.
|
|
|
|
|
IMO, yes it's too big to fail. Ethereum is now spread incredibly in many projects, there is a great community working on it, for me the technology and its potential is amazing.
Having said that, I like the sentence "it's too big to fail", since we all know that other stuff that was too big too fail, they actually failed. So, always better to be a little bit sckeptical
|
|
|
|
|
Yo también leí la noticia y también me quedé con la misma sensación que últimamente se ve en El Confidencial de echar mierda al bitcoin y demás criptos. Parece como si la culpa de que esta persona se haya arruinado o le haya ido mal en general sea del bitcoin, cuando la culpa son sus malas decisiones y la gente que se aprovechó de él. El bitcoin poca culpa tiene.
Cuánta gente se habrá arruinado en empresas tecnológicas y no veo a la gente clamando que debido a Internet perdí todo.
Por otro lado a mí me extraña la estrategia que siguió ya que de siempre en el mundo bitcoin la estrategia más seguida ha sido la de HODL, con unos pocos que se hubiera quedado en un cold wallet ahora no tendría ningún problema. No sé, me pareció todo un poco surrealista y catastrófico.
De cualquier manera, ánimo, que de donde más se aprende es de los errores, y la vida es muy larga y a veces tocan vacas flacas y otras veces vacas gordas.
|
|
|
|
|
Bueno, veo que casi nadie da porcentajes, ahí me lanzo. Yo creo que entre un 5-10% de tu ahorros sería lo suyo, depende lo que quieras arriesgar. En general casi todo el mundo se puede permitir perder un 5% de sus ahorros, jodería pero creo que no sería el fin del mundo. Eso sí, si de verdad necesitas el dinero no inviertas nada. Si no eres capaz de llegar a fin de mes (o del año) con nada ahorrado pues directamente no invertiría nada. Pero si tienes ingresos regulares y sueles ahorrar algo de dinero todos los meses, entre un 5-10% me parece buena idea. También hay que pensar que deberías rebalancear, si has invertido un 10% y sube las criptos un 100% pues toca sacar parte.
|
|
|
|
For all the Naga haters, you made clear your own opinion. You don't like Naga and you lost money, sorry. You think it'll go on worse. Ok, any opinion must be respected, but please, once you've said it you don't need to repeat it thousands times in this thread. Keep on your investment in any other coin you think it's better.
I'd appreciate if this thread were more about new progress, opinions, announcements of Naga, not just the FUD and the replica for that.
Latest news. Benjamin Bilski twitter followers decreases. Early January: 25k+ followers 13th of Feb: 5k+ followers 19th of Feb: 2.8k Followers. Looks like many ico investor already taking their exit with ngc. Can we call it fud? if all of the said data I told is true? You think it'll go on worse? - I think yes. Look at the selling and buying in BTC on HitBTC. It feels like there are thousands of people selling NGC and only few hundreds of people wanting to buy. So, what now? Pretty interesting the Naga card... It seems like a good move, right? 22% up from yesterday, those few buyers played better than the thousands of sellers. I hope you didn't seel your NGC  Anyway, this is step, this is a new company, that we'll see in a year if it finally succeed or not, but complaining everyday about its price, about no progress (only 2-3 months), etc. I think it's not worthy. I can imagine that NGC price will go up and then down, and so on, but for me I consider like a long-term investement, so I don't care too much about the daily price. I've already asked for my card, still around 8000 available, hurry up! |
|
|
|
|
Sí, es un tema complejo. A la par que es imposible requisar nada de bitcoins y demás, ya que si no tienen la clave privada pues no hay nada que hacer. No es como el dinero de un banco que supongo yo que si a uno no le da por repartir el dinero al final te lo quitan directamente del banco ya que a esa información sí se tiene acceso, o al valor de piso, coche o lo que sea que sí está realmente declarado.
La verdad que un mundo interesante a ver cómo evoluciona todo esto en los próximos años.
Algo parecido es relativo a herencias y demás, que va a ser complicado gestionarlo.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
