Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 08:59:27 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 »
101  Other / Archival / Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns on: November 16, 2014, 04:49:18 PM
That guy is pretty deranged, he's decided to make them his target now, I can confirm that I received Bitcoin for my signature fairly, whether or not it's fair price is entirely up to people but he's trying to claim they're ripping people off outright which they haven't done, though I can agree that the voucher requirements are a bit steep considering it's only 20 posts on the Bitcoin payments. The person in charge of the campaign even escrowed the funds. As for the vouchers, there's only going to be so much they can give before they put themselves out of business because they're not getting any money for it, it'd be like if I organised a sig campaign and paid people out in my Jewellery.

Edit: Here's the transaction I received as proof - https://blockchain.info/address/1H6UsFUg7vTd8FyRnuTuAsnc37HSEqQf13

I'm not deranged for simply not allowing them to dick me around.

I told them them I did not want to be part of their Signature Campaign because it pays less then the Bitmixer Campaign and like 6 other Signature Campaigns.

I don't like to fuck around with Ponzi Scam Mining Companies.

Their website uses a fake WHOIS info , Fake Address , Fake Name and there's no proof they have any Mining Hardware at all.

I don't want to be paid in a useless Voucher for 42 GH/s of "Mining Hashrate" which pays 1/4 as much as the Bitmixer Signature Campaign that does not require you to post at all.

I gave them Negative Trust Rating because they told me at first they do not accept people with Negative Trust so I said OHHH I see so you don't accept yourselves?

I don't fuck around with anything in the Bitcoin / Cryptocurrency World because everything is either most of the time a Scam , Deception or Fraud.
102  Other / Off-topic / Re: I'm a Hero of the Talks of Bitcoin! on: November 16, 2014, 04:42:54 PM
Congratulations you gonna have some giveaways ?

Nope  Cry
103  Other / Archival / Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns on: November 16, 2014, 07:29:51 AM
Actually bitmixer is closed for new participants. And cloudminer campaign is pretty good.

No Bitmixer is not closed if it was closed why can I enter it and exit it freely?

I think it is still open for SM & HM.

P.S. Have you got paid?

   ~~MZ~~

yes I've been paid for 8 weeks Cheesy
104  Other / Archival / Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns on: November 16, 2014, 05:53:31 AM
Actually bitmixer is closed for new participants. And cloudminer campaign is pretty good.

No Bitmixer is not closed if it was closed why can I enter it and exit it freely?
105  Other / Archival / Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns on: November 15, 2014, 09:06:24 PM
They revoked your voucher because you left the campaign and bitmixer doesn't have any spots available.
That being said, anyone investing with them should study the operations before investing but the price of Ghs on their website is very enticing.

Yes actually Bitmixer does have Slots Available to Sr Members and Hero Members which is why I suggested it over this shit Cloudminr.io Signature Campaign.
106  Economy / Services / Re: CLOUDMINR.IO || Sign. campaign Up to 0.4 BTC/month || ** NO FREE SPOTS ** on: November 15, 2014, 09:02:15 PM
I don't want to be part of this Signature Campaign anymore.

It requires me to post 100 posts a week to make half as much as I make from the Bitmixer Campaign.

Please give my Spot to someone else (dunno who would be stupid enough to apply if they were a Sr Member though  Roll Eyes)

Quoting this so this post doesn't go away

Why would I delete it? I want everyone to know your Signature Campaign is the worst currently available to Sr Members  Roll Eyes

No, because judging by your trust rating and your previous activities, we were sure that you resigned to scam us - not post and keep your mining contract.

... Which you did try Cheesy


BTW, this week there won't be any more free spots, sorry.
All currently enrolled users will be enrolled for the next week of course.
We will top up devthedev's escrow to 0.6 BTC again after he makes the payment to everyone tomorrow.

For those who missed this chance:
You can join our affiliate program and put it in your signature. More creativity needed but earnings can be higher, easily.

I don't have a Negative Trust Rating though unlike you  Cheesy

You're complete Lie of a Cloud Mining Company will fail in due time so I ain't worried  Cheesy
107  Other / Archival / Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns on: November 15, 2014, 12:51:39 PM
I just want to warn anyone that's a Senior Member to avoid the Cloudminr.io Signature Campaign.

Why you may ask?

Well because currently all they give you now is a 42 GH/s Voucher for 50 posts a week and you can get paid for a maximum of 100 posts a week.

If you do the math this is only 84 GH/s a week which earns less then 0.005 Bitcoin.

If you sign up for the Bitmixer.io Signature Campaign which is completely automated for Hero and Sr Members and it does not matter what your Trust Rating is at all you can earn at least 0.008 Bitcoin up to a total of 0.01 Bitcoin per week.

If you do the math this is a potential Earning difference of 0.04 Bitcoin per month for the Bitmixer.io Signature Campaign compared to a maximum and depleting amount of Bitcoins of 0.025 Bitcoins per month.

They also run a Mining Contract site that's hosted in Norway that uses a fake address and fake name and also refuses to go public with any pictures or details of who in the fuck they actually are.

I was granted a 42 GH/s Voucher and when I complained I earn more from the Bitmixer.io Signature Campaign and did not want to be part of their Signature Campaign the 42 GH/s Voucher was removed from my account.

If they have the power to outright revoke your Contractual Mining it's obvious that they are just making up the numbers as they go.

I'll stick to CEX.io for now since they've already proven they have the hardware and you are trading with other people on a market.

Just thought I would give you all fair warning to not get ripped off.

Please don't misunderstand, both BTC and GHs payment option is available. The campaign is closed for new participants except for users who want vouchers.


 =snip=

Free BTC paid spots: 0/5 M, 0/5 FM 0/2 SM
Free hashrate paid spots: 0/2 M, 0/3 FM, 0/2 SM


Payment:

weekly, per post count, escrowed by devthedev

Rates:

Member: 0.0003 BTC / post (0.12 BTC per month max)
Full member: 0.0005 BTC / post (0.2 BTC per month max)
Senior member: 0.001 BTC / post (0.4 BTC per month max)

Payments in GH/s @ VIP rates are possible.

There are spots for paid in GH/s, escrow doesn't apply for them because we give vouchers upfront.
For example: If you are confident that you can do 50 posts per week, we will give 42 GH/s voucher upfront.
If you end up making 100 posts, we will give an additional 42 GH/s voucher on Sunday.



Roll Eyes If you are telling to new participant, then you are right. New SR participants can earn more than that. Smiley

   ~~MZ~~

Ya was telling to new participants if my Spot was opened again  Cheesy
108  Other / Archival / Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns on: November 15, 2014, 10:28:05 AM
I just want to warn anyone that's a Senior Member to avoid the Cloudminr.io Signature Campaign.

Why you may ask?

Well because currently all they give you now is a 42 GH/s Voucher for 50 posts a week and you can get paid for a maximum of 100 posts a week.

If you do the math this is only 84 GH/s a week which earns less then 0.005 Bitcoin.

If you sign up for the Bitmixer.io Signature Campaign which is completely automated for Hero and Sr Members and it does not matter what your Trust Rating is at all you can earn at least 0.008 Bitcoin up to a total of 0.01 Bitcoin per week.

If you do the math this is a potential Earning difference of 0.04 Bitcoin per month for the Bitmixer.io Signature Campaign compared to a maximum and depleting amount of Bitcoins of 0.025 Bitcoins per month.

They also run a Mining Contract site that's hosted in Norway that uses a fake address and fake name and also refuses to go public with any pictures or details of who in the fuck they actually are.

I was granted a 42 GH/s Voucher and when I complained I earn more from the Bitmixer.io Signature Campaign and did not want to be part of their Signature Campaign the 42 GH/s Voucher was removed from my account.

If they have the power to outright revoke your Contractual Mining it's obvious that they are just making up the numbers as they go.

I'll stick to CEX.io for now since they've already proven they have the hardware and you are trading with other people on a market.

Just thought I would give you all fair warning to not get ripped off.
109  Economy / Services / Re: CLOUDMINR.IO || Sign. campaign Up to 0.4 BTC/month || ** NO FREE SPOTS ** on: November 15, 2014, 10:15:25 AM
Holy shit the Voucher they gave me that I had until Sunday to read 50 posts and keep they just revoked fromy Cloudminr.io account.

You guys are a bunch of scumbags seriously.

I doubt you even have the hashrate you say you have.

Enjoy your negative trust again you sack of Norweigan shit...  Angry
110  Economy / Services / Re: CLOUDMINR.IO || Sign. campaign Up to 0.4 BTC/month || ** NO FREE SPOTS ** on: November 15, 2014, 09:56:58 AM
I don't want to be part of this Signature Campaign anymore.

It requires me to post 100 posts a week to make half as much as I make from the Bitmixer Campaign.

Please give my Spot to someone else (dunno who would be stupid enough to apply if they were a Sr Member though  Roll Eyes)

Quoting this so this post doesn't go away

Why would I delete it? I want everyone to know your Signature Campaign is the worst currently available to Sr Members  Roll Eyes
111  Economy / Services / Re: CLOUDMINR.IO || Sign. campaign Up to 0.4 BTC/month || ** NO FREE SPOTS ** on: November 15, 2014, 06:23:54 AM
I don't want to be part of this Signature Campaign anymore.

It requires me to post 100 posts a week to make half as much as I make from the Bitmixer Campaign.

Please give my Spot to someone else (dunno who would be stupid enough to apply if they were a Sr Member though  Roll Eyes)
112  Other / Off-topic / Re: I'm a Hero of the Talks of Bitcoin! on: November 15, 2014, 06:16:56 AM
Congratulation  for your new rank !


Thankyou Cheesy
113  Other / Off-topic / Re: I'm a Hero of the Talks of Bitcoin! on: November 15, 2014, 05:28:07 AM
congrats dude!

Thanks dude! Cheesy
114  Other / Off-topic / Re: Answer the question above with a question. on: November 15, 2014, 04:54:52 AM
Is this thing still going???
i would assume so, based on the people replying each other on the quotes?
How could we possibly stop, given that the Original Poster did not state any rule for that?
Even if it was a rule it would be broken would it not?
115  Other / Off-topic / Re: I'm a Hero of the Talks of Bitcoin! on: November 15, 2014, 04:47:11 AM
damn this prob took like about a 1 year to do right?

Just over a year and a half yep
116  Other / Off-topic / Re: Answer the question above with a question. on: November 15, 2014, 01:48:10 AM
Would the number 360 not be more appropriate for an full circle?
"an" full circle?
Since this is gentleman, shouldn't we apply loser standards on other peoples spelling and grummar, and hodl back our criticisms?
Damn...did I forget to edit that?
An or hodl?
I don't understand?
Or do you?
Well that really depends on what are we trying to understand?
Well in that case, what would you like to understand?
I wanna know what's up with the circle comment?
Have you seen Kurt Vonnegut's little poem, "Tiger got to hunt, / Bird got to fly; / Man got to sit and wonder, / 'Why, why, why?'  //   Tiger got to sleep, / Bird got to land; / Man got to tell himself, /  'I understand.'"?
Poems arent seen, they are read , aint they ?
I believe you meant to say aren't they, didn't you?
You think it could in Braille, and be read without being seen?
I think that's what a seeing eye dog is for isn't it?
Wait, you don't mean --- a seeing eye dog can read poetry?
Dogs can't read at all so how is that possible?
How do you know dogs can't read?
Do you think I need to get my dog glasses?
Several pages ago we discussed the All-Seeing Eye of Dog (or God, can't remember now); have we gone full circle?
Did you say the All-seeing eye of DOGE?
So it DOES exist?  Shocked
117  Other / Off-topic / Re: I'm a Hero of the Talks of Bitcoin! on: November 15, 2014, 12:55:43 AM
You are an example for full members  Wink

Ya never give up we are all Heros  Cheesy
118  Other / Off-topic / Re: Answer the question above with a question. on: November 15, 2014, 12:29:09 AM
Would the number 360 not be more appropriate for an full circle?
"an" full circle?
Since this is gentleman, shouldn't we apply loser standards on other peoples spelling and grummar, and hodl back our criticisms?
Damn...did I forget to edit that?
An or hodl?
I don't understand?
Or do you?
Well that really depends on what are we trying to understand?
Well in that case, what would you like to understand?
I wanna know what's up with the circle comment?
Have you seen Kurt Vonnegut's little poem, "Tiger got to hunt, / Bird got to fly; / Man got to sit and wonder, / 'Why, why, why?'  //   Tiger got to sleep, / Bird got to land; / Man got to tell himself, /  'I understand.'"?
Poems arent seen, they are read , aint they ?
I believe you meant to say aren't they, didn't you?
You think it could in Braille, and be read without being seen?
I think that's what a seeing eye dog is for isn't it?
Wait, you don't mean --- a seeing eye dog can read poetry?
Dogs can't read at all so how is that possible?
How do you know dogs can't read?
Do you think I need to get my dog glasses?
I dunno does your dog have an eye problem? If so maybe you can get him a seeing eye dog dog?
Didn't the word Dog get renamed to Doge therefore it would be a Seeing Eye Doge?
119  Other / Off-topic / Re: Answer the question above with a question. on: November 15, 2014, 12:17:33 AM
Would the number 360 not be more appropriate for an full circle?
"an" full circle?
Since this is gentleman, shouldn't we apply loser standards on other peoples spelling and grummar, and hodl back our criticisms?
Damn...did I forget to edit that?
An or hodl?
I don't understand?
Or do you?
Well that really depends on what are we trying to understand?
Well in that case, what would you like to understand?
I wanna know what's up with the circle comment?
Have you seen Kurt Vonnegut's little poem, "Tiger got to hunt, / Bird got to fly; / Man got to sit and wonder, / 'Why, why, why?'  //   Tiger got to sleep, / Bird got to land; / Man got to tell himself, /  'I understand.'"?
Poems arent seen, they are read , aint they ?
I believe you meant to say aren't they, didn't you?
You think it could in Braille, and be read without being seen?
I think that's what a seeing eye dog is for isn't it?
Wait, you don't mean --- a seeing eye dog can read poetry?
Dogs can't read at all so how is that possible?
How do you know dogs can't read?
Do you think I need to get my dog glasses?
I thought Dog's only spoke Dogelish though?
120  Other / Off-topic / Re: Answer the question above with a question. on: November 14, 2014, 10:35:26 PM
Would the number 360 not be more appropriate for an full circle?
"an" full circle?
Since this is gentleman, shouldn't we apply loser standards on other peoples spelling and grummar, and hodl back our criticisms?
Damn...did I forget to edit that?
An or hodl?
I don't understand?
Or do you?
Well that really depends on what are we trying to understand?
Well in that case, what would you like to understand?
I wanna know what's up with the circle comment?
Have you seen Kurt Vonnegut's little poem, "Tiger got to hunt, / Bird got to fly; / Man got to sit and wonder, / 'Why, why, why?'  //   Tiger got to sleep, / Bird got to land; / Man got to tell himself, /  'I understand.'"?
Poems arent seen, they are read , aint they ?
I believe you meant to say aren't they, didn't you?
You think it could in Braille, and be read without being seen?
I think that's what a seeing eye dog is for isn't it?
Wait, you don't mean --- a seeing eye dog can read poetry?
Dogs can't read at all so how is that possible?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!