In the period from April 4 to July 26, the AMANPURI team conducts its bounty campaigns ICO and already at the initial stage of ICO all members of the bounty are offered on the amanpuri -tsp website. com KYC pass check and your data, including photographs of your passport, to present in the personal account of the investor.
KYC checks should be conducted to prevent the laundering of dirty money and combat the financing of terrorism. Logically, only investors should be subject to such verification, since participants in ICO bounty campaigns are not investors.
Can the AMANPURI team clarify the regulatory act of which state or states require the ICO team to conduct a KYC check from participants in the ICO bounty campaigns, where and how long will the collected confidential information be kept?
 At this forum, there has long been a dispute over the legality of the collection of confidential information from participants in the ICO bounty campaigns and yet no team has provided such information. Although some teams agree that participants in ICO bounty campaigns are not investors and therefore should not be tested by KYC.

AMANPURI strives to become the No. 1 exchange in the world in the field of cryptocurrency trading and has several advantages, including:
· Transaction fees are cheap,
- High leverage,
· High security
· UIUX is easy to use,
· FX trading and in-kind trading,
· With the help of the AMAL token you can halve the transaction fee,
· Holders of AMAL tokens have the opportunity to receive dividends twice a year in accordance with the increase in the price of the token.

We know that there are many good and useful coins and tokens on the cryptocurrency market, and even more unnecessary and unpromising ones. However, only in this way can the cryptocurrency be improved. Supply and demand in the market determines which cryptocurrency to live on and which one to leave the market forever. Therefore, do not worry about a large number of types of cryptocurrency. Over time, the market will remain only those that will be needed by people.

It would be surprising if investors would continue to massively invest their money in fraudulent ICO projects and still suffer huge losses. Now we would discuss the problem of stupid investors. Therefore, everything goes on as usual. The situation with ICO projects has deteriorated and they began to fall in the volume of investment and, therefore, did not achieve the desired results in fundraising.
One thing is clear: we are on the verge of some changes, since the previous situation can no longer be workable.

What kind of intruders are you talking about when discussing whether it is necessary or harmful to conduct a KYC inspection against bounty hunters? We definitely should not undergo any KYC checks, because we are not investors, especially large investors who can launder dirty money. What are the honest intentions of the ICO teams, which a lot in 80 percent of cases turn out to be fraudsters and now the data on our KYC checks are freely bought on the Internet? Here they are trying to make the prices for cryptocurrency soar to the moon. However, you are probably just out of there, because you have no idea about the real picture of the circumstances of the KYC inspection against bounty hunters.

This has long been a big problem for bounty hunters. And now a far-fetched check of KYC plays a very important role in non-payment, which is deliberately carried out at the end of the ICO or even several months after the end of the ICO. During this time, we must constantly read their telegrams in order not to miss the announced procedure for conducting a KYC audit. Otherwise, all our work for many months may be in vain.

No, without solving the problem of fraud in ICO projects, they will not be able to be reborn as before. Fraud in the ICO has reached a threatening scale, the most correct would be to regulate this activity by the state bodies. However, it will take some time, states need time to prepare and adopt the relevant regulations.

For ICO projects, no promotions are needed. In cryptocurrency, there is a completely different form of existence. In the course of ICO, tokens are issued, and securities are not needed to tokens. The tokens in the ICO have also recommended themselves well, so you should not change anything here. Soon, some reformers are ready to return from the cryptocurrency back to the normal stock market. We do not need it.

Yes, now the ICO projects are going through a very bad time. In addition to the general decline and stagnation of the cryptocurrency market, which had a negative impact on the state of ICO projects, fraud in this kind of activity simply made this activity incompetent. Therefore, I am not going to invest in ICO projects yet, but I will still be participating in the campaigns of ICO bounty.

Yes, cryptocurrency is still far from perfect. There are a lot of technical and organizational inconsistencies. For now, this should be treated as inevitable. We hope that over time the convenience in its use will increase.
I, however, are increasingly concerned about the problem of hacking and the theft of our cryptocurrency from both the exchanges and our wallets. Cryptocurrency needs to be customized for the mass user, and not for a specific specialist who will provide himself with the necessary level of cryptocurrency security. If the level of risk in working with cryptocurrency will remain large, the average man in the street simply will not use it.

A large number of tokens obtained does not mean anything. For example, the WebSpaceX campaign, the signature of which I carry, even promises to my member rank to pay 234,300 tokens a week. In a month it will be more than a million. It all depends on many factors at the same time: the number of tokens produced, their prices at all stages up to the exchange, the further development of the project and much more. Therefore, the total amount of tokens is not particularly worth paying attention to, this is not the main indicator.

The regulation of ICO activities may vary. We are regulated by regulation so that it does not concern the expediency of holding an ICO, identified the ICO team itself and checked it,  accompanied the technical side of fundraising and ensured the rights of investors and other participants in the ICO campaign. It does not make sense for them to check the buyers of new tokens, this is not the job of regulating the activities of ICO.

I do not believe that bounty hunters can receive payments in stocks. It is simply impossible to do technically. The above ICO, perhaps, in this case, saves your project and it is absolutely indifferent to them that in the end bounty hunters will not receive anything at all for their labors. There several times radically changed the essential conditions of the project. If they themselves violated the conditions, then they needed to do everything necessary to smooth out the inconvenience for bounty hunters. Instead, they began large-scale KYC checks for a long time. For me, this is just another fraudulent ICO.

Unfortunately, fraud in the ICO itself will not disappear. It collects very large sums of money and they will always attract fraudsters. To survive, ICO projects need government regulation. During it, in addition to protecting the rights of investors, it is necessary to clearly define the rights and obligations of the parties, in particular, the ICO team and bounty hunters. We need to streamline the KYC check for investors and eliminate it for bounty hunters.

It cannot be argued that all ICO projects are rubbish or fraud. And earlier there were good and promising ICO projects, and now they are, and they will continue to be. I also remember how it worked in 2017. There, 70-80 percent were working projects and all earned good money. These times still have to return. Perhaps through government regulation of ICO activities. While ICO remains a real way to improve cryptocurrency.

Totally agree with you. Headhunters are not clients of the ICO team. This ICO team is our customer. The customer is the one who pays. We do not pay, we provide advertising services for their project and therefore we are not clients of ICO projects and should not undergo any KYC checks. This is all the arbitrariness of the ICO teams. No state has ever required ICO teams to conduct KYC checks against bounty hunters. KYC verification is mainly used by unscrupulous ICO teams in order not to pay the tokens we earn.
However, in any case, if it is carried out, it must be held at the beginning of the ICO, when we join the campaign of the signature. Then the ICO team will no longer make sense to scoff at us, as they sometimes do after the completion of ICO.

KYC is intended to limit the participation of US and Chinese citizens in ICO projects. However, participation means direct investment in ICO projects, since the governments of these countries are afraid that their citizens may suffer material damage as a result of investing in these too risky ICO projects. Bounty hunters are not investors and should not be tested by KYC. Such a check for bounty hunters is illegal. However, the ICO teams are now massively abusing this right and use the KYC check so that, under any pretext after the ICO, they don’t pay the bounty hunters for bounty hunters.

The situation with ICO is very complicated now. Most likely, many contradictions in this kind of activity can be resolved only through its state regulation. First of all, it concerns the level of fraud, which in the ICO has reached a catastrophic size.
Now also the price of tokens that go to the stock exchange for the first time is also surprising. Regardless of the price of ICO, the price sometimes drops to a thousand and ten thousand tokens for one dollar. This has never happened before. In any case, at such low prices, the sense of work for bounty hunters is lost: for many months of work we get a few dollars.

If there is already a finished product in the ICO project, this is an important indication that the project is not fraudulent. Therefore, it is very important both for investors and for bounty hunters. This is primarily evidence of the working draft of the ICO, in which it is worth investing, if, moreover, his idea is also good.

This is possible only if there is government regulation of ICO activities at the place of their registration. If a significant part of the states adopt their own rules for regulating the activities of ICO, this will mean checking the members of the ICO team themselves, providing for certain mechanisms to guarantee the protection of the rights of investors and other ICO campaigners, and clear rights and obligations of the parties. Then, if ICO projects are not registered in countries where there will be such regulation, we simply will not participate in such ICO projects and then they will not have development prospects.
In the meantime, we do not have enough leverage over the ICO teams, and the bounty hunters are too divided to act together.