I'm actually getting about 1 rejected share for every 3 accepted... is this normal? (o.O)
|
|
|
{ "pools" : [ { "url" : " http://newlc.ozco.in:9332", "user" : "xxxx", "pass" : "xxxx" }, { "url" : " http://newlc.ozco.in:80", "user" : "xxxx", "pass" : "xxxx" }, { "url" : "backuppool", "user" : "username.workername", "pass" : "pass" } ], "kernel" : "scrypt", "scrypt" : true, "gpu-threads" : "1", "thread-concurrency" : "8000", "lookup-gap" : "2", "intensity" : "18", "gpu-engine" : "0-500,0-500", "gpu-memclock" : "1000,1000", "temp-cutoff" : "95,95", "temp-overheat" : "85,85", "temp-target" : "77,77", "gpu-fan" : "0-100,0-100", "auto-fan" : true, "auto-gpu" : true, "vectors" : "1", "worksize" : "256" } I'm pretty happy with this setup. I'm consistently getting about 265kh/s. I could try to get faster but the heat is going to be too much for my cards, I fear. I did hit about 330kh/s at times with tinkering but with those settings I'd be running the fans at 100% the entire time. I am getting a lot of rejected shares after found blocks.
|
|
|
jeeze, with so much memory usage, these coins mine HOT
|
|
|
Been working on it for a while, I may have just hit paydirt: { "pools" : [ { "url" : " http://newlc.ozco.in:9332", "user" : "xxxx", "pass" : "xxxx" }, { "url" : " http://newlc.ozco.in:80", "user" : "xxxx", "pass" : "xxxx" }, { "url" : "backuppool", "user" : "username.workername", "pass" : "pass" } ], "kernel" : "scrypt", "scrypt" : true, "gpu-threads" : "1", "thread-concurrency" : "8000", "lookup-gap" : "2", "gpu-threads" : "1", "intensity" : "19", "gpu-engine" : "0-800,0-800", "gpu-memclock" : "800,800", "temp-cutoff" : "95,95", "temp-overheat" : "85,85", "temp-target" : "78,78", "gpu-fan" : "0-100,0-100", "auto-fan" : true, "auto-gpu" : true, "vectors" : "1", "worksize" : "256" } I'm getting about 265kh/s from that with no real tweaking yet.
|
|
|
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o http://newlc.ozco.in:9332 -u xxxx -p xxxxx --thread-concurrency 8000 -I 19 -g 1 -w 256 that seems to work way better. Best so far. GPU0 and 1 are at about 90-98kh/s found a clue for the config file issue: JSON decode of file 'cgminerLTC.conf' failed ']' expected near ':' I can find nothing in the code that looks out of place. may just start a new config file, things are getting pretty whack.
|
|
|
any idea how 13.1 and 2.7sdk will affect bitcoin mining?
|
|
|
I'm also running CCC 11.12
|
|
|
just wanted to bump this up. The only thing I can think of is that I'm running CCC 11.9 or something I think.
|
|
|
this is in regards to the bytecoin, eh? Any ideas how you're going to get it adopted by users?
|
|
|
I'm looking into litecoin now since it seems to be more widely accepted. Thoughts?
|
|
|
{ "pools" : [ "url" : "newlc.ozco.in:9332", "user" : "xxxx", "pass" : "xxxx" }, { "url" : "newlc.ozco.in:80", "user" : "xxxx", "pass" : "xxxx" }, { "url" : "backuppool", "user" : "username.workername", "pass" : "pass" } ], "kernel" : "scrypt", "scrypt" : true,
"intensity" : "13", "thread-concurrency" : "8000", "gpu-engine" : "0-890,0-890", "gpu-fan" : "0-100,0-100", "gpu-memclock" : "890,890", "temp-cutoff" : "95,95", "temp-overheat" : "85,85", "temp-target" : "75,75", "gpu-threads" : "2", "lookup-gap" : "2",
"auto-fan" : true, "auto-gpu" : true, "vectors" : "1", "worksize" : "256" }
While running cgminer 2.11.3, when I run this cgminer just opens for a blink of an eye and then closes again. (o.O)
|
|
|
I've updated the OP with what I've found to be an efficient config file. I'm running twin 5830's with 4gb of ram on this machine. I've got CCC 11.12, 2.6 SDK I think ( ) and cgminer 2.11.3. The config file can be further modified for increased speeds. This gets about 260kh/s per card. The reason it's not balls to the walls fast is because of cooling. With summer coming up I may stop it entirely but for now this is staying in the manageable range. tinkering with the clocks for gpu/memory would be best to increase speeds. I hope it helps! This is the config file I'm using: { "pools" : [ { "url" : " http://newlc.ozco.in:9332", "user" : "xxxx", "pass" : "xxxx" }, { "url" : " http://newlc.ozco.in:80", "user" : "xxxx", "pass" : "xxxx" }, { "url" : "backuppool", "user" : "username.workername", "pass" : "pass" } ], "kernel" : "scrypt", "scrypt" : true, "gpu-threads" : "1", "thread-concurrency" : "8000", "lookup-gap" : "2", "intensity" : "18", "gpu-engine" : "0-500,0-500", "gpu-memclock" : "1000,1000", "temp-cutoff" : "95,95", "temp-overheat" : "85,85", "temp-target" : "77,77", "gpu-fan" : "0-100,0-100", "auto-fan" : true, "auto-gpu" : true, "vectors" : "1", "worksize" : "256" }
|
|
|
I'm having some trouble with my ltc mining. Here's the layout of the config file:
{ "pools" : [ { "url" :
"newlc.ozco.in:9332", "user" : "xxxx", "pass" : "xxxx" }, { "url" : "newlc.ozco.in:80", "user" : "xxxx", "pass" : "xxxx" }, { "url" : "backuppool", "user" :
"username.workername", "pass" : "pass" } ], "kernel" : "scrypt", "scrypt" : true,
"intensity" : "13", "thread-concurrency" : "8000", "gpu-engine" : "0-500,0-500", "gpu-fan" : "0-100,0-100", "gpu-memclock" : "1250,1250", "temp-cutoff" : "95,95", "temp-overheat" : "85,85", "temp-target" : "75,75", "gpu-threads" : "2", "lookup-gap" : "2",
"auto-fan" : true, "auto-gpu" : true, "vectors" : "1", "worksize" : "256" }
This is after a fair bit of messing with settings. Average hashing power is 7 and 14kh/s on twin 5830's. Not sure what's going on...
|
|
|
Why litecoin?
I'm looking for something that I can get up and running where my dual 5830's would be able to mine a decent amount. Namecoin seems a bit more limited than bitcoin and I don't get the whole idea behind using them to register a domain name.
litecoin seems like it's the weaker brother of the bitcoin. Almost like bitcoin is dollars and litecoin is cents.
Of the two, which is more widely adopted at this point?
|
|
|
With bitcoin slowly moving towards ASIC only, I'm interested in mining another cryptocurrency. I'm really not sure the difference between the three listed and there could be more I've never heard of.
My questions at this point - which one is the easiest to convert to from mining bitcoin? Which are the most commonly used at this point? Which do you see as following in bitcoin's footsteps?
|
|
|
oh same! The last block was being worked on for like 1.5 months before hearing this crazy story. I think it's nonsense. I think we got hosed by someone we trusted and I don't think we'll ever get out btc out. It'd be nice but I think Jine and Erick are the same person. Karma's a bitch.
|
|
|
R. Lee Ermey is up right now
|
|
|
Winning bid: US $9,956.99 You'd still pay it off in just over a month...
|
|
|
|