Another good news guys! CLO was listed on https://exrates.meTrading pairs (CLO/BTC CLO/ETH CLO/USD) are available.
|
|
|
Rules of featuring a mining pool on Callisto.NetworkWe have created a repo on our github for mining pools that want to have their pool featured on Callisto's web. https://github.com/EthereumCommonwealth/Callisto-Website/issues/5If your pool meets the above criteria then please contact us to place your pool on our new website. thank you Thanks a lot Solo
|
|
|
Cold Staking Contract is now available? There is an instruction? 7. If a staker is inactive for a certain period of time (approximately 1 year) then they are considered to be inactive and are disposed from the staking contract. Inactive stake is paid back to the stakers address. Staking reward is not paid for inactive stakers. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) you can find more info there https://news.callisto.network/callisto-network-cold-staking-protocol/and try a calculator in the message above
|
|
|
Hi guys, main net will start soon You are welcome to join our pool with 0 % fees in the first two weeks http://ether1.ethash.farmJust scroll a bit down to find out the settings for your Claymore's and HiveOs in json format. Solo pool will start a bit later (approx. 5-10 min after PPNLS) at http://solo-ether1.ethash.farm
|
|
|
Hi guys, could you please share what is the online wallet are you using if exist and do we have a wallet for a mac? Thanks
|
|
|
Thanks a lot for your reply, i will take a look! Did you used?
|
|
|
hi @MrPlus what about a linux version? can we talk and try to create this together? fell free to contact me.
|
|
|
- make sure you have an account <your username> on MPH
go to the "hub workers" section and create a name for your baikal miner <yourminername>
go to the drop down list for the hub worker's "job" and choose "ASIC Baikal-quark,qubit,x11,x13,x15
log into your baikal (via the IP address your router's dhcp gave it).
go to the miner tab, remove any pools data already set up, then add pools and make them:
URL: stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:12007 Algo: X11 User: <your username>.<yourminername> passwrod: x priority: 1
URL: stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:12014 Algo: qubit User: <your username>.<yourminername> passwrod: x priority: 2
URL: stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:12015 Algo: quark User: <your username>.<yourminername> passwrod: x priority: 3
URL: stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:12009 Algo: X15 User: <your username>.<yourminername> passwrod: x priority: 4
URL: stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:12008 Algo: X13 User: <your username>.<yourminername> passwrod: x priority: 5
then click the "save pools" button which will appear in green and it will reset and start mining.
Thanks a lot for your post. Do you know, if there any ways to mine next algos? : Blake256R14/Blake256R8/Blake2B/Lbry/Pascal
|
|
|
Does HiveOS supports 12gpu rig?
yes, it does
|
|
|
is this project still opened? is anybodies still using this?
|
|
|
Okay, so I'm testing this out using the startzpoolplus batch file - with my BTC address, of course, -interval set to 120 and -ActiveMinerGainPct set to 4. Benchmarking on a 6x GTX 1060 system took around 2 hours with all the default algos selected for Zpool except for LBRY (it's been ASIC'ed, so no point mining that with a GPU rig anymore).
2.5 hours after normal auto-switch mining began and the only algo selected has been X17, which seems awfully suspicious. I expected less switching, sure, but not this much less. Where should I look to troubleshoot, or is this entirely the result of the pool reporting bad/stuck data?
Same on my rigs today. Looks good. MrPlus Was this on Zpool, too, or another one? I switched over to 1.2.1 last night and in the ensuing 8 hours it still has only mined X17 (according to the entries in miner.log). This seems exceptionally unusual, though I'll admit I've only been testing out multi-algo pools for about 3 weeks now so I'm inclined to let it slide for now. Otherwise, the main PS script window is much more Spartan now and I kind of miss the ordered list of algos with their (hilariously wrong) projected earnings; if nothing else seeing that list - especially if values change, if not the order - would give me more confidence that the averaging function is working correctly (or to judge when the pool data is messed up, as has occurred with SHA256 and Lyra2v2 on Zpool recently). In contrast, I really like the average earnings stats and projected pay date that you've added. It seems like you are taking this in the right direction overall. hi. for me the same, according my log file "2/18/2018 2:01:38 AM","Hsr","wallet","nickname" "2/18/2018 10:19:03 AM","Groestl","wallet","nikname"
|
|
|
Since thursday evening I started concurrent test between ahashpool and blazepool with 3x GTX 1080 ti.
Currently blazepool is a head by a small margin:
Ahashpool: 0.00421241 Blazepool: 0.00444645
Zergpool is also up again and will continue testing it coming week.
Is that a daily’s income? Or total income since Thursday?! Its income since Thursday: Current profit, blazepool margin is increasing: Ahashpool: 0.00478314 Blazepool: 0.00553579 Just had payout from ahashpool. Might switch the other 3 gpus to blazepool as wel or start testing again with zergpool. EDIT: I found that on ahashpool it was stuck on mining x17 algo, so it probably was not mining most profitable for atleast 6 hours. Somehow my hashrate got messed up. Probably reason for the bigger difference in profit between ahashpool and blazepool. are you tested zpool?
|
|
|
hi guys, just got updated from GitHub and saw this error below any idea?
thanks
PS>TerminatingError(Invoke-WebRequest): "Unable to connect to the remote server" Add-Member : Cannot add a member with the name "CryptoNight" because a member with that name already exists. To overwrite the member anyway, add the Force parameter to your command. At C:\NemosMiner-v2.4.2-master\NemosMiner-v2.4.2.ps1:111 char:62 + ... h {$Pools | Add-Member $_ ($AllPools | Where Algorithm -EQ $_ | Sort ... + ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + CategoryInfo : InvalidOperation: (@{Bitcore=; Bla...Hodl=; Decred=}:PSObject) [Add-Member], InvalidOperationException + FullyQualifiedErrorId : MemberAlreadyExists,Microsoft.PowerShell.Commands.AddMemberCommand Add-Member : Cannot add a member with the name "CryptoNight" because a member with that name already exists. To overwrite the member anyway, add the Force parameter to your command. At C:\NemosMiner-v2.4.2-master\NemosMiner-v2.4.2.ps1:111 char:62 + ... h {$Pools | Add-Member $_ ($AllPools | Where Algorithm -EQ $_ | Sort ... + ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + CategoryInfo : InvalidOperation: (@{Bitcore=; Bla...Hodl=; Decred=}:PSObject) [Add-Member], InvalidOperationException + FullyQualifiedErrorId : MemberAlreadyExists,Microsoft.PowerShell.Commands.AddMemberCommand
|
|
|
@tio Immature is when a block hash with high enough difficulty is found by the pool, accepted by the nodes and now waiting for confirmation. Confirmation count depends on the specific coin's setup.
Thanks a lot, now it make sense for me
|
|
|
Blazepool, could you please tell me what does Immature mean?
|
|
|
|