i've send my btc 2 mins ago, but it's still pending status on poloniex exchange. Will i receive my LISK after ICO timer ends or not?

Bought 430 at 0.0006 BTC.
Price went down, bought 1500 more.  

Interesting coin, following.  

Also managed to grab some on the panic dump. Will hold looks like a good project.

I have a feeling that the wallet will be coming really soon.  

Shapetwist has a vision for WARP that is seriously amazing and some of the upcoming features might take a while. Although, I do know that extreme focus is being put on all facets of coin development, except for a price pump. In fact, even taking into consideration the recent fluctuation in price at this point, we're rockin' for a new coin.    All things considered, the successes thus far are very impressive, especially considering the actual tangible physical features of the coin haven't even been officially released yet.  

We as a community are so used to a quick pump and being able to grab profits quickly (even at the cost of threatening a coins long term future integrity) that I think that we have forgotten that the dev in this case will stop at nothing and sacrifice quite a bit to secure a long future for WARP.

Many many things that have never been done before are being done here!!!

mephoria


Name:    galacticpilgrim
Posts:    52
Activity:    52
Position:    Jr. Member
Date Registered:    December 25, 2015, 04:00:38 PM
Last Active:    Today at 03:01:30 AM

Unnecessary to assume that anyone would have to bully Sia hosts to remove chunks/block uploaders by IP etc etc. Many hosts, especially those running a business based on Sia would willingly and enthusiastically remove content that has been blacklisted by a "reputable" source (read: copyright protection agency etc). Now, there is a problem and that's that not even hosts know what is stored in the encrypted chunks uploaded to them. Blacklists would have to operate on uploaders, i.e. hosts would have to block certain IPs from uploading to them.

"Sia", by the way, does not refer to an entity of any kind. There is Nebulous Labs, which develops and releases Sia code under an open source license. Thus, the question "what will Sia do?" is non-sensical. If the question was "Does Sia implement blacklisting / retroactive removal of files/peers?" then the answer is "Currently, no". I hope the Sia code-base never gets to this point. I don't see why it has to.

Sia is not under any country's jurisdiction. Still, it is entirely probable that hosts in some jurisdictions will have to comply with local laws that prohibits distribution of some kinds of content, under any circumstance eventually perhaps even when the host cannot reasonably know what they are distributing (i.e. cannot claim innocence for any reason). In those cases, the hosts themselves can readily implement their own peer black/whitelists if they so must. This would result in pseudo-private storage network within the global Sia network, where some hosts trusts only a very few other hosts, some hosts trust most except a few, and most hosts don't give a damn.

Oh, and in Edit this comment to Wolf0's answer:
A censor would not have to force ALL hosts to drop disputed content. If a censor knows about a particular file it doesn't like, then it may be in possession of a .sia file which allows the file to be downloaded from the network. That .sia file contains the IP addresses of all hosts that store chunks of the disputed file. This list is only a *subset* of all Sia hosts globally. It would be enough to target these (~20) hosts to make the file inaccessible. As these hosts may be someone's unhardened personal computer, that may not be such a resource intensive task compared to, say, bringing Amazon S3 to its knees. So, in effect, censorship by denial of service would be quite straight forward. For this reason, it would be nice if in the future an uploader can choose its own redundancy (currently hard coded) to make such an attack more difficult (at the price of also resulting in more expensive uploads).


This looks good to me.