interested

1 NXT = 1 VOTE is the cleanest soluation. Not sure why people doubt that. All other approaches with account caps (e.g. one account can have a maximum of x votes) can be manipulated by creating mulitple accounts. And the more complicated it gets, the more are people discouraged to vote in the first place.

And of course small account holders will criticize this approach and thats totally natural, but i have a only a few nxt too and still think that people who invested in the project in the first place should have a bigger saying.

 

8515272132149388288


thx

8515272132149388288

thanks

interested

17LPMHoq8WKmLpDTs1TSc5fDY6UzDdiTYM

sent BTC 0.002

ID: 713d65f104bbee50b8925e266d4afb6b4e097bea170855f20d2d31270af76e83

interested

i still think 1 nxt = 1 vote is the best solution. we dont want to have a situation where people can create new accounts to have a bigger voting power than before.

are those rumors are or did the exchanges officially say so?

just a reminder please support Nxt on Cryptsy. Register and click "Do you like this idea?"

https://cryptsy.freshdesk.com/support/discussions/topics/44434

directly from dgex.com

The topic or board you are looking for appears to be either missing or off limits to you.



markus1000

8515272132149388288

MCnpBAbJGu5xHLmNJ2dGiw6wVcwrMWXic2

thanks

when i try to change the pw i cannot logon with the new one. im only using numbers and letters.

the exchange fees are way to high, this wont help nxt at all. Unless prices go to the moon and no other exchanges will emerge this doesnt look good for dgex.

Nxt for sure

6635869272840226493

thx

i9KfCHwN5idq9VwDADham8icuh9P4TY99d

thanks

big probs to all the developers here !

instead of countless posts about mining pools, or which animal has the best coin. It feels like this topic is way more development centered.

what is the approximate %  of the total planned distribution that has already distributed by the founders