Yeah, I'm not sure about 1gh. I submit a ton of shares then when the block is found it says I had 1 share. WTF...
|
|
|
I'm getting 110000 avg on my 560 ti non 448 I am also O/C'd like a beast on it 1100/2308 on a EVGA
-d gtx560ti -d 0 -L 64 -l F1024x16 -L 128 -i 1
PS don't cpu mine at the same time or you tank into the mid-low 70s for some reason (could be heat for me but whatever)
Thanks! I didn't get a huge speed boost but it did make the card stop squealing like a blown power supply, lol.
|
|
|
/usr/bin/ld: cudaminer-cpu-miner.o: undefined reference to symbol 'SHA256' /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: error adding symbols: DSO missing from command line collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status Makefile:376: recipe for target 'cudaminer' failed make[2]: *** [cudaminer] Error 1
any ideas? yesterday git worked just fine
hmm need to link to OpenSSL libraries now... maybe that is not done yet. The patch I supplied had a modified configure.ac. However, to make it work you have to completely clean everything flat and regenerate all the autoconf stuff. "make distclean" and run autogen.sh again.
|
|
|
Any ideas guys? Still nothing accepted... Surely shouldv'e got 1 yay by now? Yeah, I don't think it's working. I have been trying to get my Quadro 295 working and getting similar results. GPU #1: Quadro NVS 295, 70914 khash/s There is no way that card is faster than my GTX560, haha.
|
|
|
I get segfaults with the latest code from git on my GTX560. Linux. Anyone else?
I have to revert back to 4ba67197d977db26835bf49e306e800e1b9769e0 to make it work again.
|
|
|
As best I can tell the 1gh patch simply uses OpenSSL for the stratum sha256 calculation. Here is the patch for Cudaminer although 1gh is still funky, they hardly ever accept shares even though you're cranking away forever. Also keep in mind this make break it for other stratum (ie. maybe it's 1gh that is broken, not cpu-miner). diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 2f09e02..d091e1f 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -100,6 +100,9 @@ AC_CHECK_LIB([pthread], [pthread_create], PTHREAD_LIBS="-lpthread", AC_CHECK_LIB([pthreadGC], [pthread_create], PTHREAD_LIBS="-lpthreadGC" )))) +AC_CHECK_LIB([ssl],[SSL_library_init], [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([OpenSSL library required])]) +AC_CHECK_LIB([crypto],[EVP_DigestFinal_ex], [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([OpenSSL library required])]) + AM_CONDITIONAL([WANT_JANSSON], [test x$request_jansson = xtrue]) AM_CONDITIONAL([HAVE_WINDOWS], [test x$have_win32 = xtrue]) AM_CONDITIONAL([ARCH_x86], [test x$have_x86 = xtrue]) diff --git a/cpu-miner.c b/cpu-miner.c index 92be8de..d4ce1af 100644 --- a/cpu-miner.c +++ b/cpu-miner.c @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ #endif #include <jansson.h> #include <curl/curl.h> +#include <openssl/sha.h> #include "compat.h" #include "miner.h" #include "salsa_kernel.h" @@ -719,7 +720,7 @@ static void stratum_gen_work(struct stratum_ctx *sctx, struct work *work) memcpy(work->xnonce2, sctx->job.xnonce2, sctx->xnonce2_size); /* Generate merkle root */ - sha256d(merkle_root, sctx->job.coinbase, (int)sctx->job.coinbase_size); + SHA256((unsigned char*)sctx->job.coinbase, sctx->job.coinbase_size, (unsigned char*)merkle_root); for (i = 0; i < sctx->job.merkle_count; i++) { memcpy(merkle_root + 32, sctx->job.merkle[i], 32); sha256d(merkle_root, merkle_root, 64);
|
|
|
The "official" maxcoin cgminer is non-functional as it is. There are bugs and it will crash with buffer overruns, do not use it. Even when I correct the bugs I still can't get a single share accepted so I assume it's using a different algorithm.
Their cgminer is literally a straight copy of eropi4's keccak cgminer with a tiny buggy change in the keccak code. Very amateur work.
I'm going to play with it some to see if I can get the correct algorithm running in it but no promises. Also, if someone has already done this let me know so I don't waste my time.
|
|
|
if someone has an idea to fix their cgminer, I'd love to hear it ./cgminer --keccak -I 13 --benchmark Traditionally --benchmark with cgminer has only worked with sha256, I assume they didn't change that. In fact, it is unknown if their cgminer will do anything at all because the readme seems to imply that more work needs to be done.
|
|
|
Now some massive farm will put all their GPU's to crack the archive password and start mining, lol. I hope they used a long complicated password.
|
|
|
Looks like cudaMiner will have some competition at launch, they just posted a cgminer on the maxcoin github. I can't tell if it works or not, trying benchmark makes it explode. Would like to compare against cudaMiner.
|
|
|
Anyone know how pools are going to work? Is there going to be a maxcoin stratum plugin available on release?
|
|
|
Latest code gives me 60000 kh/s on the GTX560-448. Double what it was previously, awesome. The card makes a high pitch squealing sound when running this though.
|
|
|
I added your pool to the first page, and we'll get it added to the website here as well. Thanks!
I would like to get mine on the list as well hbn.cutk.comPROP, 0% fee, VARDIFF, DDOS protection
|
|
|
what is the better and strong pool to will mine it?
I think everyone is going to need to spread out to as many pools as possible. There will be a lot of people, probably way too many for any one pool.
|
|
|
Cudaminer with 780Ti reporting... 100 Mhash/s... could that be right?
When it first starts look for errors like out of memory or whatever. My hash rate goes way up when I use invalid parameters.
|
|
|
The new keccak code seems faster than a CPU I think. Q9550 @3.4 Ghz (one core) minerd-maxcoin --algo=keccak --benchmark 1151 khash/s. i3-4130T @2.90GHz (one core) minerd-maxcoin --algo=keccak --benchmark 599.59 khash/s. ( ?? must be a fluke, lots of stuff running on this machine) Celeron G1630 @ 2.80GHz (one core) minerd-maxcoin --algo=keccak --benchmark 1020 khash/s GTX560-448 cudaminer --algo=keccak -d 0 --benchmark -L16 -l F14x16 28468 Kh/s I could not get cudaminer to run on my Quadro 295NVS. Not sure of the kernel parameters, it wouldn't start (not that I would want to run on this card anyway).
|
|
|
I know where I am going to trade maxcoin. mcxnow.com is soooo much better than coins-e
yeah right, can anyone even log in to this site? I'm using Linux (not that it should matter). I created an account then I tried to log in with both Firefox and Opera and it doesn't do anything. I click "login" and it shows the login page again. Whatever, not gonna trade there I guess.
|
|
|
Sweet, looking forward to this new development Might be a fun programming challenge with not being able to test it.
|
|
|
So, heh, the source is out there and the algorithm is known. GPU miners can hit this right from the beginning.
Hopefully someone will release their code before tomorrow so as to not give advantage to those developing in secret. I imagine we could have a cudaminer by tomorrow, just need something for OpenCL/AMD as well.
|
|
|
|