anonymity is great, do you want your mom to know you bought a big black dildo from the love shop? do you want others to know what party you voted for? do you want others to know how much money you have in your bank account? do you want others to know your porn history? What we need is transparent anonymity, I know it sounds weird. It is like knowing that person is a person, but not knowing who that person is. I call it blockPOP proof of person or population. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5141142.msg50975967#msg50975967It is like we all know what wallet satoshi`s wallets are, but we don`t know who satoshi is. I guess we would if he did not mix his address before buying from a vendor. There is works around to this to, once the first address is verified that obtains the bitcoin or bitcointime, it does not matter what addresses are that spend it.
|
|
|
Truly inspiring. Thanks for compiling these citations from "the boss".
This one is probably the most important one. Satoshi scared for his life!
- Dec/12/2010 The latter is devastating.
It would have been nice to get this attention in any other context. WikiLeaks has kicked the hornet's nest, and the swarm is headed towards us.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1735.msg26999#msg26999I don't know if he fears for his life, but he didn't like the idea of Wiki. "I don't know if he fears for his life, but he didn't like the idea of Wiki." He should know there is nothing to fear, they are the ones that fear, not us. They will kill me, not you, I don`t even fear hiding behind a vpn or tor like you. My balls in plain sight. I got big balls. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkdVh8seFR8
|
|
|
Yes the western world from which bitcoin came was so fascinated about its use as a currency , trouble started right there.
Back in the days, people had trouble classifying bitcoin as a commodity or currency, the truth is there is no clear cut idea as to how to classify this s***.
The cultural and ideological painting of bitcoin as decentralized, anonymous and a tool of liberty from the tyranny of the state and the central bank has all done what?
Killed it , yes all you guys killed it, these ideologues are the reason it is killed in India. All of you grossly underestimated the power of the state and central bankers.
India setup a committee 2 years ago and it took them such a long time to come out with the s**** recommendation to put anyone who holds , sells, buys crypto for 10 years jail time. This bill is going to be tabled in winter session of parliament around December 2019. that is hardly 4 months away. Since it is portrayed as a currency it becomes a challenger to the rupee. since it cannot be considered a legal tender it has to be banned. thats how their recommendations goes.
If bitcoin was atleast marketed in a way that it will benefit the central bankers and state then it would have had some chance at survival. India with its 1.4 billion population will be out of this crypto revolution , while the rest of the world be happy with your crypto experiment.
cur·ren·cy /ˈkərənsē/ Learn to pronounce noun noun: currency; plural noun: currencies 1. a system of money in general use in a particular country.
It is not a currency it is a peer to peer e-cash cash and currency are different. Tell your goverment to ban league of legends riot points, gift cards, robblox bux, steam cash, fortnite coins, etc now Don`t blame us, blame your governments leaders. Do something about it, hack all the biggest youtube channels in india and spread the message you have corrupt leaders and your fiat money is a $cam.
|
|
|
The word "majority" is ambiguous on that tweet, it could also means anyone with majority of the hashrate are issuing the coins. It also could means whoever own most ASIC, such as ASIC manufacture and it's investor.
You are right, I do see your and DooMAD`s point, but still least favorite tweet Let`s be real, bitcoin should be fairly distributed, we should all have equal hash rate using the network and we all should be part of the consensus, per person not per how much computing power you got.
|
|
|
^ lol I don`t have any merit but thanks for the chuckle. +1 I mean peter schiff is right to hold gold, we as a species will be buying back all the gold with bitcoin in the future. It also says it in the constitution that all the debts must be paid back in gold. There is a lot of debt. The constitution in Article I, section 10 reads "No state shall...coin money, emit bills of credit, make any thing but gold and silver a tender in payment of debts..." Land will be worth more than gold in the future, but 1pound of gold will be worth more than 1bitcoin. I am talking like long long term.
|
|
|
Bernie Sanders plan is to tax wallstreet, not end the fed. Andrew Yang`s plan is to give everyone $1000 free of fed money, not end the fed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otEbT0l_Hbg here is his 1 hour of h3h3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTsEzmFamZ8 here is his 2 hour on JRE Sad both candidates given an hour on a real main stream outlet, and both fail to mention anything about the fed. Don`t fall for these puppets, The entire world depends on this decision coming up. I am serious, promote Ron Paul, He actually believes in bitcoin and Liberty. He will end the fed and show us them aliens. I am not expert but I think the best thing is for us to just vote on issues, rather than voting people to vote for us, now we have a say on the laws we must abide by and where our tax money goes. Now we all have jobs! 8.8 billion jobs created. https://imgur.com/haz02llI know how to incorporate all of this into bitcoin, it will take a few tweaks to the code but not much. I know how to make bitcointime, replace fiat and be tradable into bitcoin.
|
|
|
OK, let me simplify this for you. If the government wants to stop Bitcoin by buying all the coins, then they would fail miserably. Let's assume they bought all the bitcoins in circulation, then a lot of people would own a lot of fiat currency right. What stops us to jump to another Alt coin and just continue this again? What stops us from creating another Alt coin that are very similar to Bitcoin and then using all that fiat currency to just buy the next popular coin. They can keep on printing toilet paper money and devaluating their Dollar or Peso by buying all the coins and then when they want to sell those coins, nobody would want to buy it, because we moved over to the next coin. How long would that government stay in power, when the voters see what they are doing with their tax money? It is not about them wanting to stop bitcoin (although they can if they buy asics), it is about them being able to get bitcoin for free like they do my cherries,peaches, time, lifespan and broken spine for feeding them for free my entire life. You can keep in mind they can sell at a loss, it does not matter to them ^_^ Trump Golf Count: 202* Cost to Taxpayer: About $107,000,000** I don`t know but I know there would be no non willing homeless anywhere in America if I had 107 million. btw, 300 billion has gone to Israel for relief aid *50 of the highest tech fighter drones and nukes*, 2 billion has gone to the rest of the world. Btw, no 1 audits the fed, show me the fed audits, how do the general public know where the money is being created, and how much of it? you know this is why bitcoin exist right? Do we get public access to the data base of codes on the money? does the fed have a public ledger? NO!
|
|
|
Yes, we have some very rich elites that can even buy the total supply of bitcoin in the market without even having to print fiat but how would they do that? Satoshi alone has 1 million bitcoin stocks non touched, how would they get him to sell it? The coin you have stored personally for yourself, how would they get you to sell it?
It is already too late to do that, there is no way that government can have access to all the 21 million bitcoin supplies in the market, in which over 17 million of it has already been bought, the highest they can get to buy from that 17 million is like 3 million because I am sure that those holders too are not too weak to sell off their holding to them. So, if you consider Fed printing fiat to buy off bitcoin, it is impossible, it will on get them into trouble because they will enter unnecessary debt.
They can buy asics brother and take over the network, and not listen to satoshi`s command to always use the longest chain and freeze the old chain most people don`t even listen to the first sentence of the white paper they 3x oxymoron literally just the first sentence of the white paper.
|
|
|
His theory, in reality, would only work if all major governments would cooperate (in the case the central bank in question is the FED).
Governments don`t need to work together STEP 1) FED prints more money (like they do daily) STEP 2) FED BUYS ALL THE SUPPLY OF BITCOIN (and my fucking peaches and cherries that I back with my time, lifespan and work FOR FREE!)
|
|
|
A few rules applies to printing fiat as you can't just wake up one morning even if you're the boss in the money printing or minting office. You can't print even if you wanted except you meet the required conditions
It appears they do. required conditions, requires you to give all the people the same amount, for now I am a farmer at a market, I have to work to create my supply, you don`t. Fuck off, you are not getting any more of my fruit with your fiat $lavey $cam bullshit.
|
|
|
a) Was the screenshot of the entire page really necessary?
b) What the shit are you going on about now? This constant slew of barely comprehensible new topics is getting a bit tiresome now. Coins are still "issued in a limited and predetermined amount", so I don't see what it is you think isn't true. The code determines the issuance rate and consensus is determined by the majority running that code. So, effectively, when you think about it, "coins are issued by the majority". Again, that's still true.
a) yes I am trying to show that the other tweets are doing much better, here is a updated screen shot.b) "What the shit are you going on about now? This constant slew of barely comprehensible new topics is getting a bit tiresome now." seems a lot of people talking on discussions I start and are interested, try the "IGNORE FEATURE" Like I am about to use on you. You wanna ream on me for that go look at the politics and society board 1 guy has created 90% of the threads about jews lol. coins are issued by the majority?, no majority don`t even run the code dood, your delusional. Also the algorithm issues the coins to a minority. So a minority issue the coins to a minority. How many people have bitcoin? How many mine? It is a 10000+ to 1 just to miners to not miners How many people in the world? This is a good topic to bring it up because it shows how people feel about the current status of asics taking over, It also shows how bitcoin has changed over the years. So it is a minority not a majority and that is the damn truth, sure a majority "could" if we were all were already rich, but were not. The majority of people can`t afford 1 asic and the majority don`t even run the protocol on there home held computers, they just have there coins on a exchange, majority of users, using bitcoin do not create the supply or issue it.
|
|
|
I am locking this thread.
DO NOT VOTE FOR BERNIE IT IS A FUCKING TRAP! (SURE HE WANTS TO GIVE THE PUBLIC MORE, TO BUY THEM MORE TIME TO BUILD BUNKERS AND DRONES TO KILL US ALL) DO NOT VOTE FOR ANDREW YANG IT IS A FUCKING TRAP! (SURE HE WANTS TO GIVE THE PUBLIC MORE, TO BUY THEM MORE TIME TO BUILD BUNKERS AND DRONES TO KILL US ALL) (why do I say this, they are both number 1 trending on youtube (THEY are getting interviewed by the elite on purpose, they are puppets!)
trending is not trending on youtube, it is promotion.
neither of this man will end the fed, which en$laves all of you the general public.
vote Ron Paul he will end it, he will take your government back from the cooperation and private banker cartel.
|
|
|
will see if the JS will win... I think they will lose their main proxy (us) and much more... but time only will tell... it's important to have a little bit of suspense, for the narration . who are the others JS... ah the Federal reserve and their pedojewbucks... are we on bitcointalk? ah yeah... ahahhaha. GS = goldmansachs do you have a article for this or video?
|
|
|
Did Satoshi ever mention anything about the taxing of Bitcoin?
If you read the first sentence of the white paper, you don`t get taxed, there is a network fee, which is kind of like a tax, but not really a tax. If you use bitcoin correctly there should only be 1 fee when trading. So there was no need for satoshi to mention anything about tax. In the future I would like to see the network fee kind of support other things not just the miners, you could build a real society behind a model like this. Imagine everyone voting where the tax fees were spent in your society and everyone creating the supply rather than a few, it would be like a non communist $lavery $ystem for once.
|
|
|
This is just a dream, we are not real. Wake up, TimeBits. Wake up.
Not really a dream, more like data inside of data inside of data ∞, kind of how like windows works. Everything we see is a more of a illusion than real as many people and things interpret the data in different ways. The data is always the same, but what you recognize as blue, I smell of love. The Farnsworth Parabox is pretty close
|
|
|
It could be true if the world bank will become fraudulent to the people.
They did in 1971, the turned all the worlds real backed money (GOLD) into something backed by nothing some monopoly magical money, that they print unlimited of, So they can en$lave everyone for free, not matter if you are a doctor, farmer, nurse, burger flipper, teacher, fireman, policeman, military man you give your limited time and work for a unlimited supply backed by nothing, delusional. Listen to Nixon, the non crook about the stabilize part, it makes it unstable and there is data to prove the purchasing power has went down significantly since this action. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_Xw5tWsOQo How was nothing done in 1971? WTF? you realize we are all slaves now right? even the politicians. seriously like wtf guys? what are we doing? this is not a good system.
|
|
|
cool but why are you posting this here?
|
|
|
Greed blinds you, you are impacting the planet negatively for your own gains (just like the real miners pouring Mercury into mountains and destroying many natural habits for a bit of gold) Easy to point fingers at other people doing bad things, instead of admitting the truth about your own flaws. "making others look bad, does not make you look good" This is not American Politics, this is our EARTH. So let`s look at bitcoin and now and not point fingers at what we already all agree is a complete waste of power 2x (the $lave money) / (Us the peoples power) "YES IT IS SHIT COMPARED TO BITCOIN THE FIAT IN ALL ASPECTS" But on with Bitcoin Bitcoin uses more power than Ireland at the moment and increasing, according to this newer article (granted it`s been pretty stable atm, It will go up more when the price goes up) https://www.theverge.com/2019/7/4/20682109/bitcoin-energy-consumption-annual-calculation-cambridge-index-cbeci-country-comparisonmore power than Switzerland. Anyways, even if the power is renewable power *which is great!*, It could be used for something more important like food production, or back up shelter productions for the general public rather doing random math equations. But the fact is most people do not know: Wind and Solar, in order to create the wind turbine or the solar panels, you actually create more Co2 Emissions than if you were just to burn the traditional fossil fuels, than you will ever get back from creating the parts to make the "renewable energy " In fact you actually escalate the CO2 emissions at a ALARMING RATE. Look into water, for that is the answer for the next 100 years, it also keeps the sea levels in check, When I was 13 I had my lawn mower running on water, by splitting the atoms of h20 and burning clean hydrogen which left extra oxygen in the atmosphere which we will need to terraform mars. So you make more oxygen, You keep sea levels in check, and you don`t create on CO2 emissions splitting the atoms of h20 like when building the solar panels or wind turbines. It is a triple win. No I don`t think fiat is better, I know it is worse 100x, but I can still see that using more power than Ireland or Switzerland to "secure" a network, when there is other algorithms now that can do the same thing and do what the bitcoin does on a phone or two. So it`s not a sarcastic "Yea right!!!" It is right. Bitcoin is wasting electricity and is harmful to the environment I know you don`t want to admit it, I don`t want to either, I love bitcoin but That is the truth. This man knew it 10 years ago https://twitter.com/halfin/status/1153096538\Life Inside a Secret Chinese Bitcoin Mine https://youtu.be/K8kua5B5K3I?t=285 "The rest can only be used as treated as waste material" Hazardous waste material.
|
|
|
YES they can..and are!
I know, so what is the point of bitcoin being a limited supply To all make us think bitcoin is the answer when really it is not? although I 100% agree blockchain or advanced cryptography is the answer. Is it here to buy them another 20 years while the finish the bunkers and assault the public drones. So the "chosen people" can kill everyone else and enslave them some more?
|
|
|
|