OTOH maybe you are just saying that, but really timelord noticed you and the rest of the lauda clan are colluding scammers or scammer protectors.

That's why I suspect some recent brain injury or drug use since he then goes and opposes a flag on the chief scammer that nobody has been able to refute is conclusive evidence of scamming by the scum bag.

The only admirable quality he has is that he is clearly (depending on mood or cocktail of chemicals )not afraid of  anyone and will speak his mind regardless of the DT crews attempt to shut him down.

Also he does seem to be able to conduct some reasonable investigative work when his condition allows.  Good to see suchmoon reacting.  Beware though timelord if you do start to bitch slap suchmoon around on this forum properly, she will just ignore you and run  away.
So it's a balancing act to ensure you get max pleasure from her. I sometimes wish I could have gone easier on her at the start, but she won't give me another chance:*(

Got another batch of salted pop corn here but if Timelord2067 does show soon... well suchmoon is already being told to ignore

Come on Timelord2067 bring something substantial to make up for the wait.

Brown nosing and debating ones self like this lfc is expertly done as expected from an old pro.

PMs likely to surface with lfc offering suchmoons real dox to HG lol

Plus suchmoon and everyone else has seen the conclusive evidence you are a proven liar.  So you probably would dox it.
The old trying to kiss up to suchmoon doesn't work. You're distrusted, no grovelling and slobbering gets you back in. Like suchmoon hasn't considered ignoring those that bring the truth and reality already.
Trust can not be switched on and off when there has been conclusive proof of lying for financially related matters.

I wouldn't stoop.....said the proven liar. As it grovels around on the floor.

Now, no dox anyway. Suchmoon says QS got it wrong, others have got it wrong, it's not their twitter,
The scarlet pimpernel would have been proud. I suspect it is them, too many coincidences for the first one ordering mining equipment speaks a bit of russian etc.

Personally though I don't think doxing chunky trunks is fair until someone proves they have scammed. If they are lauda smash that dox or on the permitted boards. Until then I think doxing people is a bit too far. Only scammers should be doxed if that dox did not place others in danger. Better to report them to their local police if you have proof of scam.

Timelord is a fucking nut job. I don't think hes as nefarious as suchmoon but is just a crazy mofo. Certainly not playing with a full deck.
I had sympathy for him until he deliberately started protecting scammers.
That is a line you cross forever if it is intentional.

Anyway Timelord2067 seems to be avoiding any open dispute with suchmoon
I have no idea why so many fear her wrath. I think she's a good little pet once you show her who's boss and domesticate her.

I guess suchmoon was finally correct about something.  Timelord2067 is too chickenshit to go one on one with suchmoon in one dedicated thread.  I still don't understand timelords exact gripe with old chunky.
So suchmoon promised to go into some kind of business with Timelord2067 helping him correct his trust feedbacks ?
But then suchmoon found a new stash of cookies? or had some paint to watch dry ?and blew timelord out? Is that it?

Well we all have the popcorn and sitting here discussing the " twitter doxing " of not suchmoon.
And is suchmoon's sincere grovelling apology going to be enough?
Is timelord too chickenshit to face 180kg of suchmoon one on one?

If nothing happens in another few hours I'm taking my popcorn over to one of the more entertaining threads.

Timelord ffs bring your grievances about suchmoon. I don't even care if suxhmoon eventually proves you imagined them.  I just want to see a timelord and suchmoon argue and roll around on the floor. I don't know which will win.

Timelord ffs do you have any real dirt on suchy?  I would offer to lend you my proven scammer protector trump card on auchmoon but sadly you're also now named on that one too :*(  plus she likely has the red tags based on the voices in his head or too many tabs of acid counter card ready

Anything apart from she said she would help you fix your trust list ? feedback ? And then didn't bother?

What's everyone else got? Salted or toffee?

I'm not sure considering what has been said already in the thread what your post seeks to demonstrate.
Glad to hear you feel my mimicking of prior great posters is improving as I go.

Please though in future try to contribute to specific points in the OP.
Are you the reporter? The moderator? Or feel you can explain in detail why you believe the post in question was deleted.
Now take your time and don't just shart out " its trolling " or " it was off topic" or anything else that you can't  form a sensible and credible
argument to support those allegations  that will stand up to scrutiny.

Please contribute something of real substance or if you still want to assist me then just give the thread a little bump now and then.
I mean it would help me far more to dismantle your arguments in public but as yet you seem to scared to field anything.

That is clearly a possibility but I have seen conclusive proof of the opposite taking place.

For instance a prolific and huge scam hunter, no evidence of any financial wrongdoing ever, always fighting for fairness and equality  was punished by proven scammers on DT1 for whistleblowing on them and this was sanctioned and supported by many other DT1 scammmer supporters. The majority of Dt1 that frequently post on meta (a couple of exceptions) are untrustworthy and have all run away from answering questions on some of the scamming, scammer protecting and willful scam facilitating for pay or trust abuse or lying about financially related wrongdoing.

If I am not mistaken the same proven scammer that you teamed up with to conduct your " charity work" is perhaps one of the most untrustworthy members here. So I'll take your word with a bag of salt as I prefer to watch peoples actions rather than listen to their words.

So I wouldn't try to reinforce the false and misleading claim that being on DT1 is any kind of reference or guarantee of honesty or constantly working to make the " community safe ". The only important thing I can say about being on DT1 is that it appears to work like a honey pot for the most driven, greedy and untrustworthy. (based on my research on meta and rep in recent times)

I would say there is much evidence to suggest that DT1 is a racket where many collude to ensure they can spam the highest paying sigs and crush the competitors of their sponsors or own projects.

This thread is full of provable mistakes, willful misleading and deliberately ignoring independently verifiable evidence that refutes their claims.

Jetcash and most people ( not all) on this thread are certainly not suitable for positions of trust.
They are either willing and deliberate scammer protectors, or willing to support a system they know is corrupt and broken or just willing to look the other way.  

The merit and trust systems here are dangerous. Those promugating the notion that DT1 is an important metric or some kind of reference or guarantee they are trustworthy is a certainly a troll.

Again if any part of this post can be refuted or you require a further drill down on any point I've made here whatsoever they can request and I will provide evidence that you can verify for yourself.

The only sensible post is from actmyname. I would say only that he is overly optimistic certainly he should change meritorious with merited and is debatable with proven to be untrue after many debates.
Also the intention to decentralize does not really mean it is successful or advantageous or that 10 other users have really been chosen it is could be now a lot of socks or is going to be a lot of socks.

Also is something really decentralized if one person designs it and enforces the very lax rules?
Was the DT1 more trustworthy in it's old form?
I think that although some went rogue there are many more holes and more subtle or insidious dangers with the current systems by far.

Still compared to the other posts it was more realistic aka far nearer the truth and far less misleading than the rest.

Even the post from ieoeoe has some value. I hope he's okay.

This paragraph demonstrates why

1. DT1 means zilch with regard being trustworthy.
2. Your opinions are perhaps the result of either
a/ senile dementia
b/ just general low capacity to absorb and process information accurately.
c/ intentionally nefarious.
d/ other

Let me clearly substantiate those points

1. Many people on DT1 have indisputable and conclusive evidence proving they have been guilty of serious financially motivated wrong doing. They also are clearly abusing the trust system and some are proven liars.

If you want the evidence simply struggle over to the dirty turds thread here or take a look at the lauda flag in rep or examine the lfc proven liar thread or the nutildah proven willing scam facilitator for pay thread.
If you are incapable of researching then ask me for the specific links.


2. Your other stated opinion that Tman deserves to be on DT1 is hilarious.
He is a proven auction scammer, was implicated strongly in an extortion scheme with his best pal lauda another proven scammer.
He is a self confessed trust abuse who claims he can and will red tag people for presenting the truth.

Therefore it is very sensible that you're not on DT1 not that it makes any real difference since DT2 can trust abuse people and also get away with making false claims of trolling against those that dare to counter your spurious silly slobbering with strong corroborated arguments aka truth and reality.

I agree a long trade history should be part of the equation but of course you need to be able to process information correctly. if you believe that proven scammers and trust abusers should be in positions of trust then of course your opinions can not be trusted.

Now can you please debunk any of those points?

I'll await the running away ( ignoring or false claims of trolling you ) when I am simply correcting you and furnishing the reader with on topic and relevant information that will prevent them from being mislead by your opinions and speculations.
I don't believe you have formed these misleading opinions due to a lack of access to pertinent facts.
You simply seem to wish to promulgate false and debunked information as true.
This is really what trolling is.

Break it down point by point if you like and ask for any evidence you require.
I am always happy to be civil and help those that are reasonable.

If you are a nefarious alt then of course you will not even wish to debate in public and establish the truth.

If you really must get on DT1 then the case maybe that they are not yet confident enough that you'll be useful to them.

If you detect any trolling in this post please specifically highlight it so I can see where you've misunderstood.

Just up for a quick piss. What's all this then?
Suchmoons twitter you say. Must have a look at that. I bet lots of great cookie recipes were retweeted from that account.
What's the social media one where they post all the sexy pics of themselves ? Who has suchmoons account there?
Got my super wide monitor now can't wait to stress test it.
Okay back off too sleep now.

Timelord an insufferable twit?

So, you've been backing out of his fantasies again suchmoon?
You'd better not try that on me when I re-nter REM in about an hour from now else you'll be very sorry once I start posting ..when I wake up and Ive had a good clean up, changed the sheets etc

It's silly you 2 scammer facilitators fighting like this.
You know the honest members like myself are the common enemy.
I only hope my post can help you both reconcile. Timelord look suchmoon has apologised. She really really means it.

Nice to see suchmoon apologise. I've always liked her sincerity and a couple of other things about her.

Thanks, that's what running away looks like.
I guess Vod thinks everyone has dementia or suffering serious brain death like himself and have forgotten all about the incident.

Didn't want any of my step by step to the inexorable truth did he.
Pulled the old suchmoon scuttle on me.

What ??

There are no repercussions for red tagging anyone for anything at an admin level.

Honest whistleblowers who are also the biggest scam hunters of all time here are red tagged by the proven scammers they busted and their proven scammer pals on DT1.

There will be no repercussions for the case you mention. Unless it was a DT1 or alt of DT1 getting tagged.

There is now zero requirement at all to give some one a red tag. Give it to them based on a provable lie. Nothing will happen.
If they are being tagged on the basis of their speculated alt having been banned.
Then even if it were a provable lie and that alt was not banned it makes no difference.
If it was not even true and there was no corroborating evidence it was even an alt that would not matter either.

There are no rules for red tags, what rules people pretend there are also change according to who you are.

I hope this post was helpful.

The reader should note that the above post by nobollox1

Is an attempt to shut down the discussion.  Nobollox1 was also the thread starter who is making the baseless accusations he got called on and could not provide any evidence to support. So spreading lies it seems.

I wonder why this poor cretin would like to prevent a discussion that examines people continuously making false accusations and then when they get asked for evidence they can't provide because it does not exist, they or their pals get the mods to delete posts that demonstrate they are full of shit.

Wow, there you have it folks. The noob trash, broke down bum,  low functioning and greedy sock puppeting trolling spammer Hugeblackwoman aka thepharmacist has spoken. So yeah, you can safely disregard that morons every word. Unless you get a cheap thrill from watching mongoloids spazing out in public.  I hope you do not though, because that would be wrong of course.
I have no idea what hilarious and co has done to upset him again.

But anyway back to those that have a full set of untainted chromosomes.

When you start to pressure these DT chipmixer crew and their wanna be pals.

Their arguments and claims just collapse. They run through their routine of meeting inconvenient truths with red tags, then when that doesn't work they will try to get you banned, then will make up excuses that fall apart, then they will claim you're a troll,  then when that fails they will ask mods to delete the truths, then when you highlight that is taking place, they say who cares if it is? This isn't a democracy haha.   

Nobody owes you any explanation of why your on topic truths and independently verifiable and undeniable debunking of our lies is deleted they say.  Then when people say the forum is biased and crushes free speech to form an one sided and misleading account of reality and the truth they say... what a load of bullshit.

Of course that was thepharmacist talking there. One of hyper low functioning of the dregs on DT1.  So that was easy pickings and I feel bad even addressing his sub human slobbering.

So just to recap : no reporter owned up and presented their reasoning to report and mod still in hiding not daring to present a legitimate case for a delete that would stand up to scrutiny.

Bunches of low functioning plebs making excuses or lending unintentional support and some others asking seemingly diversionary questions.

I see.

I wonder if anyone can offer a credible reason for deleting that post.
Let's wait and see. Certainly if they can do so and explain why my reports of certain individual frequently stalking and spamming my threads with pictures demanding the legitimate  discussions stop even when they have admitted they have me on ignore so are unable to read the posts I am making?. They would certainly be interesting people to engage with.

Very thoroughly. I wish I could answer that accurately, but yes It took a while
List of speculated alts? Well aside from TOAA and some others that have been accused of being cryptohunter due to similarities in style. I've not examined all of your posts although I see you you've even been able to mimick his posting style and even explained it was a very simple and basic kind of mess that was easy enough for most to replicate . I couldn't agree more.
Searching for the truth is always of interest to me, and to spend time and effort evaluating opinions and evidence is enjoyable.

I'm always very interested in talking about any member that is brave enough to make sacrifices to stand up for the truth.
However in this specific thread I would prefer to hear from the reporter and the mod that was  complicit with deleting the post in question.

Thanks to hilarious and co for explaining there was no way to find out who deleted the post or who reported it and what their reasoning was for executing the request.

The same as it is impossible to find out what moderator marks my reports bad of the same person  spamming my threads regularly with pictures demanding members stop contributing to my legitimate debates.

This maybe should be different for meta than the rest of the forum.

In general serious accusations ( especially those than have serious consequences more serious even than proven scamming ) should be required to post conclusive evidence. If they are unable to present any corroborating evidence at all and refuse to do so then they should be banned  themselves for trolling. If you are claiming a person has taken action on this forum then how is it possible you have no evidence of this especially if you claim they are constantly repeating it.

This is not difficult to understand. If I claim you are a hyper troll and should therefore be banned, but im unable to present any examples of trolling at all? Then after you ask me 50 x and each time nobody can bring even 1 example of your trolling but I still continue to stalk your threads and post big images saying " don't feed the troll" or similar and you complained to the mods and they marked your reports bad? You would start to wonder?

Then I make more threads naming you as a hyper troll and continuing to fail to present any evidence at all, then you ask again for any examples or evidence of your trolling and say legitimately: well since the accuser.and nobody else can present any evidence of trolling it seems like a bogus and baseless accusation, but a mod deletes your post?so it looks like you just accept this ?

Lol I mean it is very strange that most people in meta prefer to try to either end this discussion, or still promulgate false information of trolling by saying " just stop trolling "  or enquires over time taken to read through members past histories.

No member here says : well yes that is fucked up, you shouldn't make continuous baseless accusations for which you can not provide any examples of trolling at all and then demand punishment and then ask mods to remove the accuseds requests to see the evidence of trolling he is accused of and remove the person being accused post sensible stating well if you have no evidence of trolling  stop talking shit and making baseless accusations.

The entire thing is ridiculous.

The thing is when forcing the accusers to drill down more they accept they can not demonstrate that what I am posting is true ( because you can not debunk the independently verifiable truth), but they claim is not relevant and on topic.

That is an entirely different accusation and must not be conflated with trolling.

What they are really saying is they don't want inconvenient truths that are relevant and on topic to be posted.
Sorry that's too bad.

Now if you want to get strict with on topic and relevant on me then we must get strict with on topic and relevant with all members.
I'm all for hammering out a permitted flow guide but as in the past when members have tried to suggest it nobody was interested.

The same as hammering out a more stringent and reliable set of rules for leaving merit. Nobody wants that either.

But anyway let's await the mod. If he doesn't come and explain then fair enough but if I had a clear and correct case for deleting a post i would simply present it and crush the members claims of bias and corruption.

That's just me though i like transparency and fair play.

I wouldn't object as strongly usually but this a particularly nasty case of deleting a persons ability to question or challenge those memebrs making serious and baseless accusations over and over.

Cryptohunter wins. We know that always happens. Having researched very thoroughly his entire history and that of all the speculated alts I see not 1 single debate or argument he ever lost or that his points were ever debunked.

The reason being as far as I can tell is he only engaged or started debates where he presented the truth or was fighting to fairness and equality. Plus that whilst he was in meta his opponents were clearly rather low functioning and super greedy and scammy and loved to indulge in some spectacular self debunking here and there.

The same will happen here since I am replicating the former greats in my pursuit to bring the truth, fairness and equality to this forum.
The reporter and the complicit mod will either run away or have their arguments and reasons for the delete smashed and eviscerated in public.

Some scammers and scammer protectors never learn: you can not debunk the truth or get away with branding it trolling.
Go ahead a keep trying though. It brings me pleasure.


Keep the posts rolling in fast please. I do hate feet draggers.  Especially when they are useful knuckle draggers haha

I agree with suchmoon a temp ban for ieooee for attempting to derail and spamming and possible infringement on the CH trademark. That can be looked into.

But enough with the jokes, off topic spam, and derailing attempts of those that fear the truth.
I expect suchmoron has been reporting my truths as she usually attempts to do.

I have asked her specifically many times for examples of where I have promulgated conclusively debunked false information as true aka trolling but she runs away each time I do so?
Now she probably just demands her mod bitches delete the challenges so she stops looking so foolish.

Who reported it and which mod was complicit?

Obviously all replies are useful but some must be deleted at a later date. You can not allow people to post demands that legitimate debates and discussions are stopped.

Lol the imbecile proving just how stupid he is.

Creates the " game " based on frequently occurring words from the cryptohunter account ( apparently) then says, well if I used all of cryptohunters posts from the beginning,  it would be easy to form rows or diagonally connected frequently occurring words from cryptohunters posts.

That is practically hilarious.

Also the lack of observable instances demonstrates a lack of knowledge of ch posting style and recent and familiar favourites whilst smashing DT and meta clowns into submission and hiding.

Anyway ignoring the speculation of origin which is not relevant to this specific discussion and is of course foolish since I am clearly enjoying posting in a similar style to those great legends that proceeded this account.

Let's get back to deleting VERY on topic. VERY relevant posts which present the truth ( no examples of evidence is presented to corroborate the claims of the accusers ) and pointing out if no evidence or examples can be found from my meager posting history that clearly demonstrate conclusively debunked information being presented as true  then the accusers are lying and misleading the reader

Now let's hear from the mod, not the deliberately misleading and moronic fools that have tried to derail the thread thus far.

Where is it hiding away? Knowing it has no argument that will stand up to scrutiny for this bias delete.

Yes many DT members and mods do the same. Use different alts for different projects.

There are no limits I guess.

Yoshie or canabalism13 one of them was asking hey can I use my wife's or aunties account to post and earn money from before.

They all want their noses in the sig trough.

This above spamming and low quality demand to stop the discussion was reported and will provide a nice example of the moderation bias here.

I have reported this exact spamming  post 5 times now in 5 legitimate threads and it has been marked bad each time??

So it seems undeniable we need to get some mods fired and bring on some credible moderators here.


How can mods allow constant baseless accusations where the accusers can provide zero evidence to support their claims.  
Yet the accused get their posts deleted where they ask for evidence and pointing out that these same baseless accusations always fail to bring any evidence or examples.

Then allow these same accusers to visit any legitmate thread by the accused and splatter it with images demanding the discussion stops? WTF?

This is quite ridiculous. This adds nothing but credibility to those other well known prior members that complain the moderation here is one sided resulting in very misleading narratives and lies being promulgated as true.

Mods here need to answer these questions because hiding up just looks more shady.
If you had a good reason to delete the post bring it here for public analysis.

Clearly if you suspect your "reasoning" for deletion are biased or corrupt or nefarious then you will run away and hide up.

Who reported and who is the mod?

Typical merit seeking moron unable to comprehend that since they have failed to present any posts demonstrating trolling; that I was never therefore a troll. Ergo I can not stop doing something that I am not or have not done.

Now watch the imbecile run away.
Bye.


Lafu ( the member working for and pushing people into what looks like one of the largest exit scams in recent years cryptopia) for once had a semi sensible idea. So I searched around for answers and found many more strange and unexplained deletes. One sensible  member even documented all of his.

This is though irrelevant to this specific delete.

The question remains can you have threads making baseless accusations and proposing punishment for alleged " infractions " that they can not present any evidence of them ever taking place?
When the accused requests examples or evidence of their alleged infractions the accusers run away and just keep repeating their baseless accusations.
Then mods come along and prevent the accused from asking for evidence and pointing out the hilarious fact that the accusers have not presented any evidence for their specious claims at all.

This kind of one sided and deliberately misleading moderation and reporting is ridiculous since these same mods are refusing to delete the same people inserting images that demand legitimate but inconvenient discussions are stopped?

New mods required.  Or make me a moderator here. I will be able to present a robust case that will not be debunked by any member as reasoning for any delete that I make or if there were to be a strange or singular occurrence that I had made a mistake, I would reinstate the post with a full apology.

I will require zero payment and will never wear any sigs. Totally free and objective independently verifiable moderation for free?

Lets first hear why the post was deleted.

Perfect example of someone like vod trying to mislead the reader by trying to label independently verifiable evidence as trolling.
I mean how can this be permitted. ?  Watch and see everything I have said about vod is independently verifiable.


Let's take it step by step.

Did you dox the forum treasurer on this forum?

Causing even theymos to agree leaving red trust on you was appropriate?

Yes or no?

No more deleting or screaming trolling did you do it yes or no?

Let's await the moronic flimsy excuses and running away.

You seem to be quoting me but replying to something entirely different?
Typo? Or is a part of your post missing?

This thread accusing people of trolling with no examples of the trolling they are refering to presented
Was launched here?


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5278333.0

It makes all kinds of bogus statements and accuses my account and others of " trolling "

I ask them to present an example of the conclusively debunked as false information my account is presenting as true aka trolling ?
They refuse to do so? They refuse to present any examples at all ?

Why?

Because they know I can corroborate the on topic and relevant claims I am making with independently verifiable evidence here. Aka they are relevant truths that the reader is fully entitled to and should not be deprived of.

These members are clearly trying to prevent the truth being presented and want a misleading account presented to the reader.

I want to know how mods here allow false accusations to continue to be presented where the specifically accused are prevented from asking for examples or evidence from the accuser??

Which mod is so dumb they believe you should be accused and yet asking for some evidence of the accusation by the accused must be deleted LOL

This means innocent members are not allowed to debunk false claims? What a corrupt place it has become.

Bring the mentally deficient moderator here please so I can demonstrate they clearly need to be removed

What sort of forum proclaiming to favor free speech would even consider hiring mods that prevent the specifically slandered to request evidence of examples of the alleged  claims made against them.

I bet the mod will hide away and never be named. Coward.








Lol at these DT1 scammers scam facilitators and their corrupt and scamming facilitator mods.

Bring you arguments here for public evisceration.


How about I and some friends just start threads about what to do about those posting scamming guides on this forum. Credit card numbers etc etc and then list the members hilarious and co,  flying hellfish , etc with no fucking evidence or examples at all.

We all just keep saying well let's report them to the police, let's dox them.

Meantime their claims they never did posted any guides on how to scam people and their asking for examples or evidence of them doing so is deleted??

Wtf?

Reinstate my post before Or explain how you believe it a legitmate delete?

I will start making accusations I can not provide examples for about mods see how they like it if that is how it's going to work around here. Which mod deleted it. I wonder if they will dare respond or just hide cowering away from a public debate on this.


How does one trace which particular mod deleted your post? What place hides the corrupt weasels that moderate here.  Why hide the names? If they can provide a sensible and credible reason for the delete why hide it?