|
Bounty raised to 68.7 BTC
|
|
|
|
If you're running a distro with SELinux, you need to set the boolean for httpd_can_network_connect to on This ends in a 404. Use -I to check return codes. |
|
|
|
Yes, but why does the passphrase need to be sent over the network?
You don't understand, it's part of the service. If you lost your password, he can give it back to you.  |
|
|
|
Just wanted to let everybody know that, of course, I did not receive any payment to my sig address  I didn't get any reply either. I feel so ignored.... |
|
|
|
Haha. Bitsky, you still investing? It would be nice if you would invest like 0.01 to see if its legit. I would chip in 0.005
It looks like my address under my control in my wallet is not as good as my address under my control on his website. bitcoin-h has ignored everything I posted so far. No explanations. No comments. Not a real surprise now that devthedev pointed out the source code "update"... |
|
|
|
Bitsky won't get any interest. Unfortunately, his Bitcoin will "disappear"
They won't because I never sent them to this service. My point is that if he really has no access to private keys, then for him coins in my wallet aren't any different than coins at his website. Ergo, he can just pay the daily interest directly to my address too without me having to transfer them. |
|
|
|
live statistic: 3340 members with over 1477.3487692308 bitcoins are trusting us!
So you are paying 5% daily interest on avg from your own pocket? 74BTC? That are about 45000 USD. If you do this for a month, it's 1.35 million USD. That's some cash for a PR stunt. If you don't have any access whatsoever to the deposited funds, why pay a percentage? You'd get lots of members by offering a $100 bounty here on the board. I guess I'll see tomorrow if I got a payment to my signature address. If what you say is true, there is no difference between using an address from your side, or an address from my wallet because you cannot access both. |
|
|
|
Your bitcoins are all time only under your control
as i said the money is only under YOUR control, its not collected in central account, is not locked, etc - you can send it any time to other bitcoin address
Then I can just use any btc address, right? I mean, you claim you don't have any access whatsoever to the deposited coins. Please pay 5% daily interest to the address in my signature from today on. This address is only under my control too. Edit on 22 Jul 2014 since this post is on page 1: WARNING: SCAM |
|
|
|
|
French regulators also forced Amazon to not deliver books for free anymore.
The results are known.
|
|
|
|
I don't know Bitcoinmax, Pirate, or payb.tc but i would like to try and help.
Care to link to more info about the incident?
The forum here offers tons of information. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=235823https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=120119.0https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=83904.0Might be a start. Pirate@40 is the loser in the whole deal. The passthroughs are the ones that really cleaned up. I seriously doubt you will ever get anything back. Have you thought about turning him in to some three letter agency as revenge? Maybe the SEC is also interested in the passthroughs?
Ian did nothing. No replies to questions, nothing. That's what irks me the most. He was all eager to get deposits but then just ignored everybody. In fact, he did his best not to help by refusing to act on behalf of his investors. As said before, I'm not after my entire balance; but I (and others) made partial requests before things blew up and those requests need to be honored. The amount left is Pirate's business (and we know how this ends). Ian has funds though. If the SEC by now has not figured out that passthroughs existed (and looks into them) then I have no faith in them. |
|
|
|
|
Maximum bounty raised from 43 to 58 BTC
|
|
|
|
Taken from the official forum Design doc: Everything possible through the Web interface should be possible through an API. Registration through the API should not be publicly allowed, though. Would this include "Show unread posts since last visit" too? Thanks to the size of the board, there are hundreds/thousands of replies and it's a pain to work through the current list. A XML style list (topic, subboard, replies, views, starter, last post by) list would make life a lot easier. It should be possible to produce a public link to a PM, publicly proving that the PM was sent. If this is not implemented really really really good, it causes a great risk of accessing non-public PM. Maybe it can be replaced with the following: Have a "save as/export" button in every PM (and maybe even every post too) where you can download a text file including subject, poster, activity, status, date, message and maybe signature, signed with a public BTC address belonging to the forum. That way you can store important PM/posts offline and prove it existed, even if the forum is down. |
|
|
|
|
Last time I checked:
Daily coins: 0.00000001240
Minimum withdrawal: 0.00015500
Minimum transaction fee: 0.00010000
Now let's add some math:
Minimum withdrawal reached after 12500 days (34.25 years)
Minimum transaction fee reached after 8065 days (22.1 years)
That's the most useless faucet ever created. Might be worth it if you think in aeons.
|
|
|
|
I tried to put action groups in place to get back property or prosecute people that scammed people and live in the USA.
The majority of bitcoiners say "Its not worth the time or effort" WE THE Bitcoin population allow this shit to continue due to the lack of action by the community.
The losers that lost their coins dont have an interest in "throwing good coins after bad coins". I didnt lose there so i wont take part but i would if i was a victim.
I'd really recommend all the investors to form a group action against him and them just have the law firm handle as much as possible.
Not only do you need to find investors who want their money back, but you also need a local agent. Even for a big bounty (see signature), nobody seems to be interested. |
|
|
|
|
Paste the error messages you are seeing if you boot normally
Without any information, it's just guessing.
When you boot into single user, you can look into /var/log/messages or dmesg to see what's going on.
Also, what did you do? A normal yum update should not break anything like that
|
|
|
|
Any reason why you are so obviously ignoring my sign request? |
|
|
|
|
Why don't you prove it by signing with the address which holds 2.8kBTC?
Of course you can always send it to me, but I have reasonable doubt that you hold that much
|
|
|
|
|
On what version is the fork based?
Maybe the main client has a commit for these Mac issues that can be ported?
|
|
|
|
but now i am getting the next error. it is really annoying (I fixed already a few before): local/lib -o build/net.o src/net.cpp
src/net.cpp:60:1: error: unknown type name 'array'
array<int, THREAD_MAX> vnThreadsRunning;
^
src/net.cpp:60:6: error: expected unqualified-id
array<int, THREAD_MAX> vnThreadsRunning;
^
Maybe this gets you another step further: adding in src/makefile.osx
# osx 10.9 has changed the stdlib default to libc++. To prevent some link error, you may need to use libstdc++
CFLAGS += -stdlib=libstdc++ Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=403936.msg4860134#msg4860134 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
