Bitcoin Forum
June 09, 2024, 05:58:25 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 »
101  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw on: November 13, 2018, 09:06:33 PM
@kerney666

when's the gpu watchdog feature going to be added.  The miner loses a card after several hours and it's not usually the same card.

Detecting it is trivial really, question is what behavior you want supported next? Executing a restart.sh/restart.bat script in the current dir? Imho the best thing when you have a driver hang is a reboot anyway, not sure an in-process restart of all gpus would be successful in that many cases.

Reboot script would be great. Yup it's typically stuck in driver and a hard reboot is required.  However, right now GPU won't hash while it still consumes power.

Yes, this miner desperately needs an error handler. An option to shutdown/reboot would be nice to stop GPU from consuming power with zero hashes.

kerney, when developing watchdog, can you make option to: restart miner + reset vega cards + reapply OverdriveNtool? Like SRB have?
For me, never need to reboot whole rig, restarting, reseting vega and reapply clocks and voltages and mining is ok again...

And is it possible now in start.bat input code to reset vega cards with devcon or something, apply overdriveNtool and start mining? Any examples?

Txs!

This is really useless. You are asking for the miner to be idiot proof and friendly.

The watchdog restarting the miner is EXTREMELY HARD under Windows. And is borderline virus. Reseting Vega cards? You probably mean the "disable/enable" the Device. This is the same level of difficulty. And it can lead to LOTS of complications. Also, apply OverDriveNTool? Why would the miner need to support functionality for 3rd party software, which only some people use? SRB is NOT a good example for a good miner. For various reasons.

I would suggest you to find a way to make this script (.bat) by yourself, not to expect a miner developer to cater for stuff, that is not related with the miner itself.
102  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw on: November 11, 2018, 09:57:35 PM
Eish, sorry to ask, but how do I do that?


You could have looked in the --help menu...
Miner.exe --help.

--gpu-platform <arg> Select OpenCL platform ID to use for GPU mining (default: -1).

Set it to 0 or 1.
103  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw on: November 11, 2018, 09:28:44 PM
One of my rigs, the cards are being picked up by software like afterburner, device manager etc., but no mining software sees the cards. Any ideas?


Change the OpenCL platform.
104  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw on: November 11, 2018, 10:25:47 AM

terry1

Hi dev,my 6xvega cannot login pool.Do you have any idea?

bat is :    teamredminer.exe -a cnv8 -o stratum+tcp://xmrv7-bj.ss.poolin.com:443 -u terry1.%computername%   -p x


Aaaaand where is the wallet address?

"terry1" is not a valid wallet address if this is exactly what you are inputting there.
105  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw on: November 11, 2018, 06:50:48 AM
Hi dev,my 6xvega cannot login pool.Do you have any idea?

bat is :    teamredminer.exe -a cnv8 -o stratum+tcp://xmrv7-bj.ss.poolin.com:443 -u terry1.%computername%   -p x


Aaaaand where is the wallet address?
106  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw on: November 08, 2018, 06:39:29 PM
Okay, a bit of information.

The CPU verification works really well now.

Instead of 20-40 shares Rejected for 24hours, there are 0. This is good.

The HW errors implementation is not proper though.
Seems like the HW Errors are not passed to the API.
Check the picture below:



GPU1 and GPU3 have both 1 HW detected (as said by the miner), but the API says 0 for both.
107  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw on: November 08, 2018, 08:44:02 AM


The issue seems to be coming from the CN_CONFIG, for some reason, it did not like `8-7`. When i changed it to `7-7`, it started okay.


thanks ku4eto,  7+7 for my 470/480/570/580 4G is ok
v0.3.7 in auto = bsod or 0h/s
v0.3.6 auto = ok .

no card  monitor connected .

the new update is very helpful, the new stats, bus reorder and clean shutdown is nice.

however, one of my rig which is mixed 13 rx570 is having hard time achieving its max hashrate at startup. (unlike previous miner, sometimes, at startup, max hashrate is already achieved). it needed dirty tricks which is disabling and enabling lan.

another 13 gpu rig which is identical, all samsung is fine.

anyway, hope you wont change anything in the code about my issue, it seems that i like it better than the old miner.

i only need to dirty tricks my mixed rig once, than multiple times before this update.

I'm glad to hear the miner is running well for you and that the new features are going to good use Smiley
The problem of hashrates varying is known to us, and seems to happen with other miners as well.  We plan to address this in the future so that max hashrate is always achieved, but we don't have an ETA for when we will get to that.
Lately we've mostly been working on getting the miner to be stable for everyone.

I was using manual config of `8-7`, not auto.
108  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw on: November 08, 2018, 07:32:46 AM
Okay, i tried 0.3.7.

There is an issue when starting the miner and the GPUs.

For some reason, one of my GPUs will NOT initiate properly (first was GPU2, now is GPU1), and it will run at only 1 thread, the other thread is seemingly crashed, since it spews 500+HWs per 30 sec. Running 0.3.6 is all OK.

Hi ku4eto,

These stability issues seem to have no end.  It seems like every time we change something to get some rigs to be more stable, some else's start having problems.

That said, can you provide a bit more information about your rig and how the miner is behaving?
What OS are you running?
What version drivers are you using?
What GPUs are you running?
Can you post the output of the miner when it is having the issues you described?

This information would help us a lot in trying to find the cause of the problem.

The issue seems to be coming from the CN_CONFIG, for some reason, it did not like `8-7`. When i changed it to `7-7`, it started okay.

Also, the hashrate seems to have increased as well, gained ~60-70h/s total.

OS is Windows 10.
Drivers are 18.2.1.
The GPUS are 1x570 and 3x580.
The output was normal, just showing hw: ### for 1 random GPU (the one that does not initialize properly). And it keeps mining as if nothing happens (at lower hashrate though).
109  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw on: November 08, 2018, 05:49:05 AM
Okay, i tried 0.3.7.

There is an issue when starting the miner and the GPUs.

For some reason, one of my GPUs will NOT initiate properly (first was GPU2, now is GPU1), and it will run at only 1 thread, the other thread is seemingly crashed, since it spews 500+HWs per 30 sec. Running 0.3.6 is all OK.
110  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw on: November 05, 2018, 02:19:47 PM
For some reason, it is much LESS forgiving on GPUs. Running XMR-Stak, i get maybe 2-3 Rejected/Invalid shares per day on the crappy GPU.

On the TRM, i get on that in 12hours - 40-50.

But it actually BSODs less. Go figure.
111  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw on: November 04, 2018, 05:02:58 PM
Miner hangs the RIG when trying to close it.
Same problem on two different RIG's.
1- G3900 / ram 4gb / 4xRX570 4GB + 3 RX470 8GB / LTSB 14393 / 18.6.1
2- G3900 / ram 4gb / 7xRX470 4GB /  / LTSB 14393 / 18.6.1

Are you closing it down with the "X"?
If so, try using CTRL+C and then typing "Y" + Enter.
If it still does, maybe your cards are not happy with the straps.

Yes, with X.
I tried. It did'nt help.

Also, i get 0 h/s for most of the cards.
Only 1 or 2  cards from each start mining.

I tried to run the miner with stock clocks and voltages, with config 2+2...  Nothing helps.
Strange thing is that i can mine on my rigs without any problems ethash or Cryptonight v7, but have problems with v8.
SRB crashes out in 1-2 hours, TRM gives 0 h/s on almost all cards.


If you have pasted straps from 1500 to the higher ones, i would say its bad straps. Try running it on 1 card, which you have flashed the stock BIOS before that.
112  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw on: November 04, 2018, 02:09:10 PM
Miner hangs the RIG when trying to close it.
Same problem on two different RIG's.
1- G3900 / ram 4gb / 4xRX570 4GB + 3 RX470 8GB / LTSB 14393 / 18.6.1
2- G3900 / ram 4gb / 7xRX470 4GB /  / LTSB 14393 / 18.6.1


Are you closing it down with the "X"? If so, try using CTRL+C and then typing "Y" + Enter.

If it still does, maybe your cards are not happy with the straps.


Also, the miner needs a good exit way. The old sgminer had "q" for exiting. The allocation would need to be cleared (have not actually checked if its doing so) when exiting. This can prevent crashes when re-launching the miner multiple times.


EDIT:


Performance tests:

1280/1950 Elpida
1300/2100 Samsung
1300/1950 Elpida
1300/1925 Elpida
At 0.95V
Doing 4260h/s at ~530W at wall.

1280/1950
1280/2100
1280/1950
1280/1925
At 0.925V
Doing 4180h/s at ~515W at wall.

1250/1950
1250/2100
1250/1950
1250/1925
At 0.925V
Doing 4060h/s at ~500W at wall.

I did not really try 1250@0.9V, performance loss seems to be going 1:1 with power consumption reduction below 1280 for me.

Compared to XMR-Stak: First decribed clocks at same voltage were giving me 4090h/s@520W on CNv7, and 3870h/s@570W on CNv8.

EDIT2: I saw something weird. Fails to connect to the Devpool for some reason.



hi man, nice results! please can u share with me what cards are u using for each number? also maybe timings for elpida and sasmung? im not able to go above 950h/s or so...u have 4gb or 8gb?

All cards are 4GB.

Cards in order are:

RX 570 Gigabyte Aorus
RX 580 Red Dragon
RX 580 MSI Gaming X
RX 580 MSI Gaming X

I am core bottlenecked at around 1280-1300Mhz for all 4 cards.

The straps are not public.

Also, more on the Dev Pool connection.

After even restarting the rig, issue persists, along with new message.

113  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw on: November 04, 2018, 11:46:34 AM
Miner hangs the RIG when trying to close it.
Same problem on two different RIG's.
1- G3900 / ram 4gb / 4xRX570 4GB + 3 RX470 8GB / LTSB 14393 / 18.6.1
2- G3900 / ram 4gb / 7xRX470 4GB /  / LTSB 14393 / 18.6.1


Are you closing it down with the "X"? If so, try using CTRL+C and then typing "Y" + Enter.

If it still does, maybe your cards are not happy with the straps.


Also, the miner needs a good exit way. The old sgminer had "q" for exiting. The allocation would need to be cleared (have not actually checked if its doing so) when exiting. This can prevent crashes when re-launching the miner multiple times.


EDIT:


Performance tests:

1280/1950 Elpida
1300/2100 Samsung
1300/1950 Elpida
1300/1925 Elpida
At 0.95V
Doing 4260h/s at ~530W at wall.

1280/1950
1280/2100
1280/1950
1280/1925
At 0.925V
Doing 4180h/s at ~515W at wall.

1250/1950
1250/2100
1250/1950
1250/1925
At 0.925V
Doing 4060h/s at ~500W at wall.

I did not really try 1250@0.9V, performance loss seems to be going 1:1 with power consumption reduction below 1280 for me.

Compared to XMR-Stak: First decribed clocks at same voltage were giving me 4090h/s@520W on CNv7, and 3870h/s@570W on CNv8.

EDIT2: I saw something weird. Fails to connect to the Devpool for some reason.



Even after restarting the miner, its the same. Starts with the same message.
114  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw on: November 03, 2018, 06:48:45 PM
hello, hope this helps someone:

my bat:
teamredminer.exe -a cnv8 -o stratum+tcp://xmr-eu1.nanopool.org:14444 -u mywallet -p x -d 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11 --cn_config 7+7,7+7,7+7,8+8,8+8,8+8,7+7,8+8,8+8,8+8,7+7,8+8

my cards
core is for all cards 1200/900mV, mem is or each cards below:

1   XTR 8G Hynix 2200 H5GQ8H24MJR
2   XTR 8G Hynix 75,4 2225 H5GQ8H24MJR

3   GIGABYTE RX 580 GAMING 4 GB  Hynix 76.1 2000 H5GC4H24AJR
4   XFX RX 580 GTS XXX 8 GB Samsung 73.8 2025 K4G80325FB

5   GIGABYTE RX 580 GAMING 8 GB Hynix 74.4 2200 H5GC8H24MJR
6   GIGABYTE RX 580 GAMING 8 GB Hynix 78.2 2200 H5GC8H24MJR

7   GIGABYTE RX 580 GAMING 4 GB Hynix 73.9 2000 H5GC4H24AJR
8   GIGABYTE RX 580 GAMING 4 GB Hynix 71,5 2000 H5GC4H24AJR
9   GIGABYTE RX 580 GAMING 4 GB Hynix 75.8 2000 H5GC4H24AJR
10 GIGABYTE RX 580 GAMING 4 GB Hynix 77.2 1975 H5GC4H24AJR
 
11 Sapphire PULSE RX 580 8 GB Samsung 76.3 2050 K4G80325FB
12 GIGABYTE AORUS RX 580 8 GB Hynix 71,3 2100 H5GC8H24MJR

this is my results:
855
871
912
953
858
860
912
755
910
894
1032
822

i dont understand why i cant get above 900 for almost all cards..any advice?
P.S. ignore cn_config order as it is not the same, just 4GB has 7+7 and 8gb has 8+8 results and my cards match,thats important.




Increase core clocks maybe? Or your memory straps are probably bad. Or both. At 1300/2100, a 580 4GB Samsung does ~1070h/s.



Also, the reported stats from the API... i kinda do not understand one thing from it:

Code:
ku4eto@KU4ETO:/mnt/c/Users/ku4eto/Desktop$ echo -n "gpu|1" | nc 192.168.0.106 4028
STATUS=S,When=1541273696,Code=17,Msg=GPU1,Description=TeamRedMiner 0.3.5|GPU=1,Enabled=Y,Status=Alive,Temperature=0.00,Fan Speed=0,Fan Percent=0,GPU Clock=0,Memory Clock=0,GPU Voltage=0.000,GPU Activity=0,Powertune=0,MHS av=0.001071,MHS 30s=0.001073,KHS av=1.071,KHS 30s=1.073,Accepted=3513,Rejected=2,Hardware Errors=0,Utility=2.115,Intensity=20,XIntensity=0,RawIntensity=0,Last Share Pool=0,Last Share Time=1541273664,Total MH=106737536.0000,Diff1 Work=105460424.693228,Difficulty Accepted=105390424.41133447,Difficulty Rejected=60000.24162330,Last Share Difficulty=30000.12081165,Last Valid Work=1541273664,Device Hardware%=0.0000,Device Rejected%=0.0569,Device Elapsed=99665|



Why the Share size is not an Integer number, instead, its Decimal O_o. This is, considering that i am using static difficulty of 30000. The Rejected Difficulty shows 60k, which is 2x30k shares, but there are some decimals appended. Same with Last Share Difficulty.
115  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw on: November 03, 2018, 08:09:23 AM
Another question.

How are the GPU|N calculated? Based on PCI or some other method? From what i can see, GPU|N corresponds to the same way, they are shown in the AMD Driver panel. GPU0 is GPU0, and so on, and thus meaning, it is probably NOT PCI related.
116  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw on: November 02, 2018, 09:25:12 PM

A clarification for the Power Usage though - i observed it, and although lower, it would still spike to ~20W higher than the average. Not sure if you have observed this.


It's an unfortunate side effect of the algo and the efficiency level of this miner in the various stages of CN. I'm 100% sure we will solve it in a good way in the end though. See I reply I wrote ~30 mins ago here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5059817.msg47528064#msg47528064 for more details.



Ops, sure did miss that.

I may have missed the answer to my next question:

Since the 570 and 580s have 32/36 CU's, why they both run at 7-7/7+7 ? None of my cards liked 8-8/8+8, while i see some people have run them at 8-8/8+8.

And what exactly does the CN_config do? The miner API reports
Code:
Intensity: 20
regardless of the CN_config values.

Ah, we should integrate the CN config better into the API.

The numbers are only about the nr of pads per thread, so directly related to mem consumed. The +- is a little mode tweak that sometimes does nothing and other times something.

If your cards are 4GB, 8+8 would consume everything, and it won't work. 7+7 or 8+7 should be doable depending on how much the driver has grabbed on the card(s) already.




I assumed that it would be like that (4GB cards here), but was not sure. Using Windows, and the Windows driver limitation for the max VRAM allocation should be ~3584MB, and 8+7 sounds like it would use more than that... but it works Cheesy
117  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw on: November 02, 2018, 08:53:46 PM

A clarification for the Power Usage though - i observed it, and although lower, it would still spike to ~20W higher than the average. Not sure if you have observed this.


It's an unfortunate side effect of the algo and the efficiency level of this miner in the various stages of CN. I'm 100% sure we will solve it in a good way in the end though. See I reply I wrote ~30 mins ago here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5059817.msg47528064#msg47528064 for more details.



Ops, sure did miss that.

I may have missed the answer to my next question:

Since the 570 and 580s have 32/36 CU's, why they both run at 7-7/7+7 ? None of my cards liked 8-8/8+8, while i see some people have run them at 8-8/8+8.

And what exactly does the CN_config do? The miner API reports
Code:
Intensity: 20
regardless of the CN_config values.
118  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw on: November 02, 2018, 08:29:18 PM
Somethign that came to my mind after reading your answer.

The reason, why the power consumption is lower, is it because there is no CPU verification? 20-40W difference is big, and i doubt it, but does not hurt to ask Smiley
ff, but it works. I left only the most relevant data. Replace again IP and PORT with the ones you need.

Ha! That would def be cheating, wouldn't it? No, I can assure you that the lower power draw is from the continuous gpu work. After all, cpu verifications are for found shares only, so depending on your pool diff you maybe crunch one CN hash on the cpu every 10 secs (max)? It's tiny work in the grand scheme of things. Love the question though!



A clarification for the Power Usage though - i observed it, and although lower, it would still spike to ~20W higher than the average. Not sure if you have observed this.
119  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw on: November 02, 2018, 08:08:58 PM

I checked with them, seems like you are correct, they have not changed the error message. The rejected shares are due to crappy card quality, not playing nice with the strap. Another thing that i seem to notice is, XMR-Stak was discarding Invalid shares, but logging them regardless, which were equivalent to Hardware Error (HW). But on this fork, instead of being HW, its a Rejected share. I have used the sgminer-gm-5.5.5, and it was doing HWs, instead of rejected shares. Pretty confusing.

I will be checking for the 30/60s stuff for the API.

Thanks for reporting back! In the current version our miner doesn't have cpu verification of the hashes, probably the only one that doesn't. We just send everything to the pool and let them check the shares. We're just about to add the cpu verification parts though, so when that's in place we will be reporting bad shares as "HW errors" as well and not piss of the pool(s) when you push your mem straps too hard Smiley.



Thanks for the answer.

Somethign that came to my mind after reading your answer.

The reason, why the power consumption is lower, is it because there is no CPU verification? 20-40W difference is big, and i doubt it, but does not hurt to ask Smiley





Also, if anyone wants to pull API information remotely, and see what the miner reports, you can do with the following:


Be sure to have started minning with  --api_listen=IP:PORT, default port was/is 4028

Code:
echo -n "gpu|N" | nc IP PORT > log.txt 
- no colons, space between the IP and PORT. N = GPU number, [0-9]

The pulled data is not in good format, so you need to edit it.

I have made a script for this:

Code:
#!/bin/bash

echo -n "gpucount" | nc IP PORT > log.txt
GPU_COUNT=$(grep -oP '(?<=Count=)\w+' log.txt)

i=0

while [ $i -lt $GPU_COUNT ]
do
        echo -n "gpu|$i" /n | nc IP PORT /n >> log.txt
        true $(( i++ ))
done


sed -i 's/STATUS/\n&/g' log.txt
sed -i '1,2d' log.txt
sed -i 's/^.*GPU=/GPU=/' log.txt
sed -i 's/Temperature=0.00.*KHS//' log.txt
sed -i 's/Utility=[0-9].*Rejected%=[0-9]\.[0-9]//' log.txt
echo -e  >> log.txt

Dirty stuff, but it works. I left only the most relevant data. Replace again IP and PORT with the ones you need.
120  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw on: November 02, 2018, 05:54:25 PM

Seems like there are changes on what is transmitted over the API, can you give more information about it?


We haven't changed anything API-related per se, but maybe you're hitting this thing: there is a very confusing design aspect with the sgminer API that we just had to follow to be compatible. The json keys for e.g. avg hashrate last N secs change when you change the period between prints. We did change the default period from 60 secs to 30 secs at some point, so the API keys have changed as well. The proper (and annoying) way to do it is to first send a "config" command, check the reported "Log Interval" value there. That value, in our case "30" for 30 secs, will then be used in the keys for all other messages, for example the "summary" command will return the key ""KHS 30s". Imho it's an idiotic design, but we had to follow it. We have a command line option for changing the period. If there's anything else you're noticing, let me know.

Also, there is an issue, when mining Graft for example, which is a CNv8 coin as well.

Code:

[2018-11-02 16:59:23] Pool graft.ingest.cryptoknight.cc share rejected. (GPU3) Error code: -1 - Wrong algo, use monero7 miner (432/430/2)



When checking the Pool side, it reports hash rate as if 3 cards are mining, not 4. On CNv7, i have used XMR-Stak to mine Graft with
Code:
monero7
flag, since it seemed that they have the same metadata information.


This looks very strange. We only have one pool connection that is shared by all cards, and the shares we submit are for sure CNv8. I'm guessing the pool might not have updated their error message after the fork? Moreover, in your printout above you have 0.46% rejected shares though, nothing out of the ordinary. I tried the same pool now, no problem for my 550/580/Vega 64 test workstation. In the reported stats every 30 secs, are all four cards hashing ok?




I checked with them, seems like you are correct, they have not changed the error message. The rejected shares are due to crappy card quality, not playing nice with the strap. Another thing that i seem to notice is, XMR-Stak was discarding Invalid shares, but logging them regardless, which were equivalent to Hardware Error (HW). But on this fork, instead of being HW, its a Rejected share. I have used the sgminer-gm-5.5.5, and it was doing HWs, instead of rejected shares. Pretty confusing.

I will be checking for the 30/60s stuff for the API.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!