I know people are very optimistic and starting to think about bigger growth of bitcoin but in my opinion ,  it is still too early to say that .  If you look at the news and speculation surrounding the Fed's sudden 0.5% interest rate cut, you'll see that it's not all positive, instead there are some theories that the economy is at risk of a recession . If a recession happens , I think it will have a significant impact on the market and we are unlikely to see a real bull market as expected.

I agree with some that we need to be careful with what is going on and watch the market reaction over the next few days before making any decisions .  Sell ​​the news could still happen or the market could fall sharply again if recession fears become more evident .

If I were OP, I wouldn't be afraid of being blamed and what I'd be more worried about is if he took company money to invest in bitcoin. What if bitcoin is dumped and his company needs money to fund its business operations? That would put his company in jeopardy and worse, bankruptcy.

So in my opinion, don't give him any investment advice but instead suggest him some investments, which may include bitcoin. But make sure he takes the time to learn everything about them first and only invests money that has nothing to do with the company's budget or reserves. Using corporate funds to invest in bitcoin is a bad idea, IMO .

Staying neutral about the election will help you avoid unnecessary controversy, you are great. But I disagree when you say that having a pro-crypto presidential candidate won't make it more popular. If you are a celebrity, someone with a large fan base, you will see how much influence you have over them. Trump is not only a billionaire but also a former president and a candidate this year, so his influence will not be small. Don't underestimate a celebrity speaking out in favor of cryptocurrency.

But I agree with you that we still don't know what they will do after they are elected, whether they will keep their promises or will forget all the promises they made. Everything remains in question because the future is unpredictable . I don't know about you, but if I get a chance, even a small one, I'm ready to seize it and not let it go. So I support him and hope he will bring positive things to the crypto industry .

Even if bitcoin becomes widely adopted and more people use it, I don't believe we will eliminate fiat. Simply because the government will never let that happen, if that happens it is like the government has collapsed. As long as the world is under their control and management, don't expect us to be able to completely eliminate fiat or the banking system.



Trust me, there is nothing to be ashamed of and no one feels ashamed of using fiat and banking because they use them every day. There may be complaints, annoyances but in the end people still continue to depend on them because they are the main means of our lives.

If OP dares to answer honestly, I'm guessing he's still using fiat and banking, and has never used bitcoin for everyday payments. Bitcoin is not a legal currency in most countries and most people just want to invest in it, not many people want to use it for payments. That is what is happening and we should accept that fact.

It is going to be a two-match series. I am watching a lot of people saying that Bangladesh might win one of the matches.
I understand they are saying this because Bangladesh was able to win against Pakistan recently.
But I think we should understand that the Pakistan team is not anywhere close when compared to India.
There was a time when the Pakistan team was one of the best in the world. But those days are long gone.
Now Pakistan is not as strong team. They even struggle against weaker opponents.
So just because Bangladesh was able to win the series against Pakistan, doesn’t mean Bangladesh is going to trouble India a lot.
I am saying this as a Bangladesh cricket fan, is most probably not going to win a single match against India,


You know, In India most Ducks in 2024 was Jasprit Bumrah, Shubman Gill and Sanju Samson. I can see many best players just sitting on the  bench like Ruturaj Gaikwad, where Gill is getting opportunities again n again to increase his Duck record lol, don't know why!!

So this one is Ten Hag's biggest win as manager?

If Man United fan are extremely deluded, only then they will make this win a big deal, because otherwise, this is literally JUST Barnsley. But there are positives to take here as a United fan that the tactic allows them to score if they want to. Now they know, if played well they can overcome their shortcomings. The way they played in the game if replicated in a dominant mentality, could bring a lot of good results in the Premier League.




https://www.theguardian.com

I think Erik Ten Hag had a lot of the blame pointed at him, which is deserved, but the players do need to step up at games at times. You can coach or teach someone how to do a certain thing, but you can't go out there and do it on their behalf right? That's what it looked like about United recently. The whole club now needs to live up to their name, and stay united during the hardships and comes back strongly for everyone's good.
Look what Ten Hag said, they just gave opportunities to each other to score and boost their confidence. 26-year-old Rashford had a great chance of making hat trick, but he gave a penalty to Antony. Working as a team was the main factor of such kind of success.

Markhors were able to win the match against the stallions easily. It was definitely one of the best bowling displays that Markhors put on. The target was not something that was out of reach by any means. In a 50-over match, a target of 232 is definitely not a big one. But the bowling performance that they have shown was incredible. They were able to restrict the stallions to 105. Zahid Mahmood (5), Salmam Agha (3), and Naseem Shah (2) have taken all the wickets.



Again another one-sided match between the Panthers and the Lions. Panthers actually had given a decent target of 284. And in reply Lions could only 199 before being all out. Mubasir Khan (90) and Haider Ali (84) have taken the target so far for the Panthers. The extras given by the Lions were also pretty big, it was 30. in that, 25 was wide balls. So they had given 25 extra balls for the opponent team to play. Needless to say without the 30 extras, the total would have seemed to be not so big. But it wouldn't have mattered anyway because the Panthers have performed really well in the bowling side as well to make sure that they win the match.

Even though USA actually lost the first two wickets pretty quickly, they were able to recover from that situation, and in the end they were able to win the match pretty comfortably.

I have to say I think that USA bowlers actually did a very good job. All of them had an economy of less than five. And I think that’s where Namibia actually lost the match. They were unable to put up a big enough target and the USA team was just a little too good compared to Namibia.

Patel (72) was the top score on the chase of 200, then he got bowled out. Mukkamalla able to add more 59 out of 71 balls. Monank-Mukkamalla's partnership pushed the match with 106 runs and really good individual performances to make sure that USA won the match.

I would say both matches have significant value to their fanbases, but history wise, and if you are a neutral, you would probably favor the AC Milan vs Liverpool match. They played against each other in two finals in the last decade, both are great teams and have always been that way.

AC Milan is a transitioning team, and aren't doing that good in the league right now. They are struggling to find their sweet spot and see themselves on the 9th spot in the Serie A after 4 games, with a total of 5 points. Not so solid, is it?
Liverpool on the other hand are going to be really hungry after their disappointing loss against Forest, a team no one expected them to lose against. The game is in San Siro, definitely a difficult day for any visiting team, should be the same for Liverpool, as well.


Inter Milan vs City might go for penalty in the end. you know, both managers know enough football to out-tactic the other in their own ways. Erling Haaland started the season in dream-like form, and he is expected to keep firing his shots in the Inter goal. On the other hand, Inter is not looking too bad either, as they are also yet to lose a game this season, having racked 8 points from 4 games in the league. Both of these games will be amazing to watch, for sure.

How will BTC change the world in the future? BTC cannot change anything about our world. It is just an asset, a highly volatile investment , and it only benefits those who know how to take advantage of its volatility to generate profits.

Bitcoin is a financial market while mining is a business . If you don't have knowledge and don't have a good plan, you will still lose your investment in it and will go bankrupt if you mine without a good strategy . Don't exaggerate about bitcoin that it can change the world or bring wealth to people just by investing or mining it .

Is it fair to take EOS as an example and assume that all altcoins are the same? Can you tell me how many times ETH price has increased since 2013? and I bet you it won't go away anytime soon. Or even a shitcoin that everyone has despised since its launch like Dogecoin, its price has increased millions of times and I also see no signs of it going away as many bitcoin maximalists said. Bitcoin is indeed the safest investment in the market but don't deny that there are also many altcoins worth investing in.

Investing in bitcoin for decades? I bet not many people can do this, including you and me. You need to look at the reality, most are just speculating on bitcoin based on the 4 year cycle and some have started complaining because bitcoin price has not increased yet and bull season has not started yet. Even holding for 4 years makes many people impatient, let alone holding bitcoin for decades, not too many people can do that.

In the last few seasons of Jurgen Klopp's Liverpool, there was one big problem we could see in the games. The problem was the same that we saw on Sunday when Liverpool went up against Nottingham Forest at home. If you have watched enough games of Liverpool, you know what I'm talking about, and if you haven't, the problem is how poor the team plays against a low block. This set of players always goes through a really difficult time against a team who are just majorly defending and trying to get done with a draw or a very scrappy win.


https://www.theguardian.com/football/2024/sep/14/big-setback-arne-slot-says-liverpool-fell-below-standards-in-forest-defeat

As Arne himself said after the game, this was the first time he faced a low block with this Liverpool team, and I might sound weird, but I'd say this loss is a good thing because this lets them to learn from how to play against a low block team, and now Arne can build the team from the loss. Nottingham Forest did not do anything crazy tactic wise, but I also felt that the Liverpool players were not giving their all on the pitch. They looked a bit careless, a bit slow, and not at their best. This also played a big role on them not being completely effective and lead them on to a loss. They need to bounce back from this immediately, as they face AC Milan in the midweek and have difficult league games ahead.

The United States surpassed China in 2021 to become the world's largest bitcoin mining hub, but did you know that Biden has proposed a 30% tax on miners? While that could cause miners to move to other countries, he doesn't seem concerned about that. Therefore, it is not convincing to assume that just because many domestic financial institutions are investing in bitcoin, it means that the Harris administration will support bitcoin adoption or introduce bills to promote its development. What they want is more and more taxes, not necessarily any intention of promoting market development.

I don't trust Harris when it comes to crypto because of what the Biden administration has done although she could still change that stance after she is elected. When it comes to cryptocurrencies, Trump is more trustworthy.

You are right that the Hoffenheim team was not as strong an opponent as Leipzig. This group is relatively a weak group. A victory against such a team is certainly not a matter of public pride for a team as big as Leverkusen. Still we appreciate Leverkusen because their gameplay was really good. Leverkusen dominated the match and won by a big margin of 4-1.

After the defeat against Leipzig, many of us thought that this team would not be able to fight for the title. Leverkusen may not be able to compete for the title this season. We probably won't even see a better performance from Leverkusen this season. But Leverkusen's players proved us wrong. The team performed well in the entire match. And won by dominating. And I would say if this performance can be maintained, Leverkusen can do well in the upcoming matches as well. Leverkusen can win even against big teams. Leverkusen has this capability.

You are right. If Leverkusen want to be Bundesliga champions again, they will have to be at their best. Because Bayern Munich, one of the rivals for the Bundesliga title, is in good form this season. Also the performance of the Leipzig team is very good this season. Dortmund's players are also playing well now. So Leverkusen's players must perform better if they want to occupy the top spot in the table.

Leverkusen's coach Xabi Alonso is very talented. Leverkusen won the Bundesliga title last season with the help of Alonso. The Leverkusen coach was able to find out the weaknesses of his squad in the match against Leipzig this season. And Alonso has managed to minimize the problems within his squad to a great extent. And that's why we saw a packed performance from Leverkusen's players against Hoffenheim.

Leverkusen will face Feyenoord in the Champions League in a few days. This match is very important for Leverkusen. But the Feyenoord team is also strong enough. It will not be easy for Leverkusen to win this away match.

Leverkusen's performance against Hoffenheim was very composed. In the previous match we saw poor performances from Leverkusen's players. It's been a long time since Leverkusen lost a Bundesliga match. Leverkusen lost 3-2 against Leipzig. Leverkusen lost the match due to the weakness of their defense. And I'd say Leverkusen needed to lose this match. Leverkusen's players will be desperate for a win against Hoffenheim after losing their previous match. And in this match the boys of Leverkusen played brilliantly.

The performance of Hoffenheim players was good in this match. Hoffenheim wanted to win their home match. So Hoffenheim players played attacking from the beginning of the match. But Leverkusen's forwards and defenders both had solid performances. So Hoffenheim's players could not break Leverkusen's defense even after trying hard. If Leverkusen continues this form, Munich vs Leverkusen in the last week of this month is going to be a very competitive match.

There is no doubt that both Australia and England are very strong teams in the T20 format. And in the first two matches both the teams played quite well. Although England's batsmen could not bat well in the first match, they performed well in the second match. The England team won by batting at the big target given by Australia. Liam Livingstone is in great form at the moment. In both the matches we saw better performances from Livingstone.



Manchester's Emirates Old Trafford Stadium pitch is not batting friendly. England team collected the highest on this pitch. England team won by batting on a target of 195 runs against Pakistan. England's collection was 199 runs in 19.1 overs. However, England are well aware of the conditions on this pitch. I expect England to win today's match as well. However, the batting of most of England's batsmen is irregular. This is why I am worried about whether to bet on England's win.

Online or offline storage, do we use paper, steel or titanium for storage...is there any method that is absolutely safe? Every storage method has its pros and cons, no method is perfect enough to be able to withstand every risk in this world. So in my opinion, let's use the method that best suits our situation and I believe that is the best solution instead of following other people's ideas when they don't suit us.

Using titanium to stamp the seed phrase isn't bad either but I find it unnecessary and just adds cost instead of giving us more security . As some have said: the safety of the seed phrase will depend on its privacy to others and being kept in the safest place, not just on the type of metal we use .

That's why I never liked the idea of ​​teaching bitcoin to older people or convincing our parents to invest in bitcoin. To me, this is a bad idea because the benefits they get are much less than the risks they face .

But it is confusing when many people try to convince their parents to invest in bitcoin or worse , explain to their parents about bitcoin with the intention of asking their parents for money to invest in bitcoin . Meanwhile, our job is to earn money and take care of our parents, not the other way around, taking their money or putting them at risk . Bitcoin is a good investment but not suitable for everyone because not everyone can bear the risks it brings .

We don't need him to do positive things for bitcoin or fulfill every campaign promise . What we need is for him to not impose harsh regulations on the market and have a more open policy, that alone is a win for the crypto industry .

We can't ask too much from any government because bitcoin and cryptocurrencies are still so new and small that it's normal for them not to care. But we cannot deny that bitcoin is getting more and more attention from people worldwide , in every government, country...for example it has never been mentioned in previous elections but things are gradually changing . So it would be great if we had a government that is friendly to us instead of an unfriendly government .