Also read the comments.  "Are you sure you're not overreacting to some jokes this mother makes?"  Yeah, apparently wanting to murder your child in a mountain is only a "joke".  They're all in FULL DENIAL MODE.

Remember the "I am Adam Lanza's mother" blog post that went viral a few hours ago?  Well, http://sarahkendzior.com/2012/12/16/want-the-truth-behind-i-am-adam-lanzas-mother-read-her-blog/ nurture, not nature, people.

It means if you don't use their funny green papers, they will find a way to put you in a cage.

What's the price on one of those?

Because, for every evil in the world, if the perpetrator is part of the gang doing business as "government", he gets a magical pass made of unicorns and double standards.

Negro running drugs?  25 years in a cage.  Person doing business as "CIA" doing drugs?  Hero.

It's also exactly as insane as priests getting a free pass on diddling little children for centuries.

When magical thinking is involved, most people can't think straight.

That's the way this crazy world works.

I agree with you, actually.  I do not think that violence should be used to try and recoup what the scammer stole, or as a retributive mechanism -- first, everyone knows that people in Heaven (or Hell) don't, can't, won't pay their debts, and second, well, aggressing against a person is just wrong.

I think that the scammer should be compelled by ostracism only to return the stolen funds.  In pursuing such, it would be wise to contact the people listed as his friends and give them a heads-up.  If his social network compels him to pay pay, he'll pay up much, much faster than pursuing legal "solutions" against him (which will only end up making money for the lawyers).

In Chile they had a private bill collector business dedicated to doing exactly this.  They'd hire big burly guys, dress them in very nice and spiffy suits, and then have the dapper gentlemen openly follow the scammer around, telling anyone who interacts with the scammer that he is a scammer and he has not paid a debt.  Sometimes the company would also spring for night serenades with a musical band, singing right in front of the home of the scammer, with loudspeakers, all about how the scammer hasn't paid his debt.  Never would they resort to violence, of course.

Scammers paid.  Oh, did they pay.

Nationalism is the belief that being born in an arbitrary plot of land that you didn't choose, somehow makes you superior or more worthy than being born outside said plot of land.

Nationalism is an insane belief, as insane as thinking that having faith in a certain invisible magical being is superior to having faith in a different invisible magical being.

Nationalism is also a very dangerous belief, because it predisposes people to collectivize strangers from different plots of land and believe evil and false things about them.  And you all know what is enabled by such an odious collective belief (hint: the rulers can use this to order the peasants to mass murder the other peasants, and their peasants will happily comply).

When you break beliefs into their structural components ("people doing things"), pretty much all modern cultural beliefs are simply insane.

Remember that the "guns" debate was never about whether guns are good or bad.  It was about punishing people violently for wanting to own guns legitimately.

Individuals who want to "ban guns" use this dysphemism to disguise what they really want: they want costumed men with guns (oh, the irony!) to steal guns from non-violent gun owners, drag the remaining gun owners into cages, and kill those gun owners who resist.  If you want to know how what these individuals want looks in observable reality, just watch the videotaped Waco massacre.  These individuals are anti-social elements trying to pass off their pathological wants as some sort of "social good".

In political discussions, the object of the discussion is never the real topic of the discussion.  The real topic is who will get victimized by the "authoritays", how to structure the escalation of this organized crime (up to and including death), and how this organized crime will be disguised as "virtue".

(FYI: In the gun "debate", (a) is responsible gun owners, (b) is fines, caging, death, (c) is "but think of the children".)

I believe there's a market in TOR where "making things happen" can be had for a good price.

This thief says he's invulnerable and untouchable, that nobody will find and punish him, so everyone should just deal with the fact that he won by robbing you all.

This small-time crook forgets that he lives in South America, where pretty much anyone will stab him through his eye for a few bucks.

If you do evil, evil will happen to you.  It's just a question of time.

--------------------------------------------------

Este ladrón dice que no le pueden hacer nada y que es intocable, que nadie lo encontrará, así que todos deben quedarse callados y aceptar que él les robó.

Este estafador insignificante se olvida de que vive en Sudamérica, donde cualquiera lo puede despachar al más allá por unos cuantos pesos.

Si haces el mal, mal te van a hacer.  Sólo es cuestión de tiempo.

It is safe to say that the fuel powering the malicious machinery that is SA, is quite likely "welfare".

Statists resort to this belief as a form of fearmongering.  It is, of course, a lie.  They can't possibly know whether this would happen in a stateless society, and we know this is so, because whenever they want to "prove" their belief, what do they do?  They bring up examples of statist societies, where the examples of organizations who supposedly are "very dangerous" have, in fact, been empowered by (you guessed it) a state.

It's nothing but projection, see?  Statists project the fact that in their statist system, they support the accumulation of murderous power in the organized criminals doing business as "government", who, of course, trample on the little guy as much as they want.  They pretend this is a form of "protection", but, of course, it isn't protection any more than any other Mafia charging you "protection money" to "protect your business from burning down".

Their whole "argument" boils down to "I want the strangers I worship to kill / cage / rob me if I disobey them, because I am scared of strangers killing / caging / robbing me".  Anyone with two brain cells to rub together understands how pathologically lunatic this Livestockholm Syndrome is.  It is a classic example of projection of abuse to deny their own abuse.

Sounds to me like the people doing business as "government" have accomplished what no one thought possible: they have made the Negro into a slave once again.

No wonder people say all the time "Oh, but we can't take their welfare away, don't you see that without our help, the Negrothe poor would starve to death?"

I am adding Equilux to my ignore list for not contributing anything of value, and for deliberately misrepresenting good people to make them look bad and provoke them.

Just FYI, subSTARDED, FirstAsshat and ElectricVomit are all in my ignore list, and this thread is about conspiracy theories now -- so this thread is amusing as hell, more amusing than an FBI release about aliens with three quarters of the text censored out.

"But what about all the poor people?"

Simple: http://youtu.be/d2a5wtTrlLs?t=17m38s

I see some people are still having this bullshit non-conversation about "guns" (really, about punishing people violently for their beliefs).

Here's some valuable advice for those of you who continue pretending that this is actually a conversation:

http://youtu.be/d2a5wtTrlLs?t=17m38s

Philosophically, that's know as a "vacuous truth" -- "true, but pointlessly so".

The thicker the liquid is, the worse it wicks in general.  If you have a thick oil, the best thing you can use is something bridgeless where the coils are exposed, like an A7 atomizer, and drip the liquid instead of keeping it in a tank.

Though dripping brings out a lot of the flavor in my fluids, I actually don't drip because it's just too damn inconvenient (especially when driving).

While this might be true, at least in an ancap society aggressors will get killed or ostracized, which is an improvement to what happens in a statist society, where they get to be presidents and cops and judges and soldiers, killing / ruining / caging / robbing everyone by the millions, with absolute impunity.