Eclipse Twitter Promotion!In order to star to bring awareness to Eclipse, we are going to be making a large push on Twitter and rewarding our followers who participate!The first promotion will reward users with 15 EC simply for following twitter.com/EclipseCrypto and providing your EC address.Step 1: Sign on to Twitter and follow twitter.com/EclipseCryptoStep 2: Fill out this Google form to provide us your address so we can track activity without annoying you every time: http://goo. gl/forms/ga2gcFsUsO (copy/remove space)
Here are the rules:1: Obviously you've gotta be a follower 2: You have to have at least 50 REAL followers (we'll verify on TwitterAudit) 3: Participate and earn EC That's it. Stay tuned to the thread and we'll have regular promotions to earn additional EC!Main thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378922.100
|
|
|
|
Eclipse Twitter Promotion!In order to star to bring awareness to Eclipse, we are going to be making a large push on Twitter and rewarding our followers who participate!The first promotion will reward users with 15 EC simply for following twitter.com/EclipseCrypto and providing your EC address.Step 1: Sign on to Twitter and follow twitter.com/EclipseCryptoStep 2: Fill out this Google form to provide us your address so we can track activity without annoying you every time: http://goo. gl/forms/ga2gcFsUsO (copy/remove space)
Here are the rules:1: Obviously you've gotta be a follower 2: You have to have at least 50 REAL followers (we'll verify on TwitterAudit) 3: Participate and earn EC That's it. Stay tuned to the thread and we'll have regular promotions to earn additional EC!
|
|
|
|
I have errors during the compilation src/init.h:10:21: fatal error: eclipse.h: The file or directory does not exist
#include "eclipse.h"
^
compilation terminated.
make: *** [build/smessage.o] Error 1
dev without #include "eclipse.h" in init.h the error is solved is required the #include "eclipse.h" ? Are you sure that secp256k1 finished building? You can't comment out that include. Your error looks like secp256k1 didn't finish building. Did you try a fresh pull and build with our make file? |
|
|
|
Never run anything as root ..
The latest commit is compiling and running fine now finally
Thanks for sticking with it! We appreciate all the support you provide for every coin that you offer mining services for. If there are asshole voices coming from this account, it's because there are several of us. |
|
|
|
 EclipseCrypto version v1.0.0.0-g (2016-02-28 15:17:03 -0700) Operating in full mode. Using OpenSSL version OpenSSL 1.0.1f 6 Jan 2014 Startup time: 02/28/16 23:16:06 Default data directory /root/.eclipsecrypto Used data directory /root/.eclipsecrypto dbenv.open LogDir=/root/.eclipsecrypto/database ErrorFile=/root/.eclipsecrypto/db.log Bound to 127.0.0.1:35914 TOR thread started. AddLocal(eedngwl7r7p3aqc5.onion:35914,6) Loading block index... Opening LevelDB in /root/.eclipsecrypto/txleveldb Opened LevelDB successfully SetBestChain: new best=000001e79ad85e44c7b1 height=0 trust=4194320 blocktrust=4194320 date=02/23/16 08:54:20 ResetSyncCheckpoint: pending for sync-checkpoint 00000eca234f07edc98aaf3f2a7b7478dc58992a9cd439323d099c6a590ca2bb ERROR: LoadBlockIndex() : failed to reset sync-checkpoint EclipseCrypto: Error loading blkindex.dat Finalise() StopNode() Flushed 0 addresses to peers.dat 1ms Shutdown complete. try to restart it Yes. Sorry. You need to start it twice. |
|
|
|
Please do not remove that line. You need to link against our secp256k1 library and that is where the makefile tells you to link to the one that is built and that we provide which is located in that directory. As for the gmp issue, we mentioned this before that you have to install gmp manually into /usr/local/lib since gmp has a broken pkg-config when used in conjunction with secp256k1 (any secp256k1). Please try the following to do a fresh clone and try again to install rm -rf eclipse git clone https://github.com/EclipseCrypto/eclipse.gitcd eclipse/src make -f makefile.unix |
|
|
|
dev this lines is required
if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash))
return 1; ?
Yes, it takes a 32 byte big endian scalar hash and returns two 32 byte big endian scalars that describe a point on the eliptic curve secp256k1.  with this commit https://github.com/EclipseCrypto/eclipse/commit/e7897d90e3b89abd23cd9eb82d87c0908b84c235 this error solved ? sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’:
sigringu.cpp:150:60: error: ‘secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes’ was not declared in this scope
if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash))
^
make: *** [obj/sigringu.o] Error 1
Nope, error is still there  Yes, and we made no announcement for that commit too. |
|
|
|
dev this lines is required
if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash))
return 1; ?
Yes, it takes a 32 byte big endian scalar hash and returns two 32 byte big endian scalars that describe a point on the eliptic curve secp256k1. with this commit https://github.com/EclipseCrypto/eclipse/commit/e7897d90e3b89abd23cd9eb82d87c0908b84c235 this error solved ? sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’:
sigringu.cpp:150:60: error: ‘secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes’ was not declared in this scope
if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash))
^
make: *** [obj/sigringu.o] Error 1
No, that commit was not the final for this fix. The final for the fix is https://github.com/EclipseCrypto/eclipse/commit/0b1593e2a443ae24a763be7eeef2ab5d74da7d7bFollow these instructions: BUILD FIX IS IN
1. Delete your existing eclipse directory just to be sure.
2. Clone the repo.
3. make -f makefile.unix
|
|
|
|
dev this lines is required
if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash))
return 1; ?
Yes, it takes a 32 byte big endian scalar hash and returns two 32 byte big endian scalars that describe a point on the eliptic curve secp256k1. with this commit https://github.com/EclipseCrypto/eclipse/commit/e7897d90e3b89abd23cd9eb82d87c0908b84c235 this error solved ? sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’:
sigringu.cpp:150:60: error: ‘secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes’ was not declared in this scope
if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash))
^
make: *** [obj/sigringu.o] Error 1
1. Delete your existing eclipse directory just to be sure. 2. Clone the repo. 3. make -f makefile.unix |
|
|
|
dev this lines is required
if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash))
return 1; ?
Yes, it takes a 32 byte big endian scalar hash and returns two 32 byte big endian scalars that describe a point on the eliptic curve secp256k1. |
|
|
|
After secp problem solving i fetch a error
sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’:
sigringu.cpp:150:60: error: ‘secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes’ was not declared in this scope
if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash))
^
make: *** [obj/sigringu.o] Error 1
i remove the line 150-151 from sigringu.cpp and then make -f makefile.unix
Yeah but this cannot work, you're just removing that function from the source.. If the source/binary ever needs this function it will fail i compiled by removing this line the dev can say if this function is needed i try to help Yeah cheers and thanks for your help, you've helped a lot more than the dev actually Post an error message next time. If you wait until literally Sunday morning to post a helpful error message, do you think you are going to get help immediately? Legit devs have legit lives. You had all weekend to post an error message. You had all time since launch to get your repo cloned onto a vm/vps and do a simple test compile there. It's not my job getting bugs/flaws ironed out you implement or do testing which you didn't Nevertheless with all the love in this thread and your attitude, good luck with this project. Agree with ocminer i notice this problem yesterday i have solved in 2 minutes also ask where is the problem https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378922.msg14033384#msg14033384and i dont get a answer the like problem is on secp and i ignore it you answer What do you mean problem? There is no problem. Run it a second time. if you have answer we have problem on secp e.g i had the solution from yesterday Your question was "can someone tell me where is the problem". Describe the problem. No one can read your mind. |
|
|
|
After secp problem solving i fetch a error
sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’:
sigringu.cpp:150:60: error: ‘secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes’ was not declared in this scope
if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash))
^
make: *** [obj/sigringu.o] Error 1
i remove the line 150-151 from sigringu.cpp and then make -f makefile.unix
Yeah but this cannot work, you're just removing that function from the source.. If the source/binary ever needs this function it will fail i compiled by removing this line the dev can say if this function is needed i try to help Yeah cheers and thanks for your help, you've helped a lot more than the dev actually Post an error message next time. If you wait until literally Sunday morning to post a helpful error message, do you think you are going to get help? You had all weekend to post an error message. You really come across as quite the dick. Keep your shitcoin fuckboy. It's a 2 way street. If there is a problem post an error message. We don't know what is happening in your computer screen. |
|
|
|
After secp problem solving i fetch a error
sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’:
sigringu.cpp:150:60: error: ‘secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes’ was not declared in this scope
if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash))
^
make: *** [obj/sigringu.o] Error 1
i remove the line 150-151 from sigringu.cpp and then make -f makefile.unix
Yeah but this cannot work, you're just removing that function from the source.. If the source/binary ever needs this function it will fail i compiled by removing this line the dev can say if this function is needed i try to help Yeah cheers and thanks for your help, you've helped a lot more than the dev actually Post an error message next time. If you wait until literally Sunday morning to post a helpful error message, do you think you are going to get help immediately? Legit devs have legit lives. You had all weekend to post an error message. |
|
|
|
This thing is still failling to compile for me:
./configure: line 12320: SECP_64BIT_ASM_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12349: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12377: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12402: SECP_GMP_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12508: SECP_OPENSSL_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12526: AX_JNI_INCLUDE_DIR: command not found
Seems that secp is somehow broken, I downloaded with --recursive already and manually tried to compile secp first - no luck.
Secp is not broken itself. The autoconf includes are. This is indeed a bug with the build scripts. It looks like we tested fresh builds from the private repo at bitbucket, but somehow the repository did not fully transfer correctly to github, where we did a fresh git init. We are making and testing a repo fix now. It really would have been better for someone to post the error message sooner. We can't test under every possible condition, and testing does not always find the bugs. It's obvious in hindsight that we should have done build testing from the public repo. We did many build tests from the private. |
|
|
|
This thing is still failling to compile for me:
./configure: line 12320: SECP_64BIT_ASM_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12349: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12377: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12402: SECP_GMP_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12508: SECP_OPENSSL_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12526: AX_JNI_INCLUDE_DIR: command not found
Seems that secp is somehow broken, I downloaded with --recursive already and manually tried to compile secp first - no luck.
Did you manually compile the secp256k library that we included in the repository? Also, just for clarifications, can you provide autoconf and automake versions? |
|
|
|
[Suspicious link removed] works? , because i do not see any coin in my wallet and pool keep saying 33 blocks pending and 66 blocks confirmed
Maturity is 120 blocks. |
|
|
|
whats the point of this coin?
It bleeds crypto. |
|
|
|
|
Dear everyone trying to build the wallet:
Golden rule, don't make assumptions about how your build environment relates to building this coin.
Use our makefile. Follow its spirit and letter.
Second rule, we included our own secp256k1 for a reason. It is custom. You can't use your own. Link to ours. Look at the make file for how it is built.
Secp256k1 is designed as an external dependency, so we had to make our custom one quasi-external. Build it according to our recipe and make sure it installs to secp256k1/lib and secp256k1/include in the source tree. This was the most straightforward way to do it without forking secp256k1 and calling it something else, etc.
Third rule, manually build and install libgmp to the default location /usr/local. The need to do this is a known issue with libgmp. For some reason known only to some mystics, the libgmp pkg-config is broken from the factory. This is not our bug. Complain to them. libgmp is necessary for secp256k1. Any secp256k1.
Fourth rule, install libevent-dev if you are using debian/ubuntu.
Fifth rule, if you have a problem, don't be coy. Just PM us with the build error or post it here.
Golden rule restated: It's not just another clone, so don't try to build it like it is. And anyway, who wants to mine just another clone?
|
|
|
|
can someone tell me where is the problem ?
What do you mean problem? There is no problem. Run it a second time. |
|
|
|
That's a site scan. I scanned the actual zip archive, which is clean too. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
