 Based on price movement and social media presence The market has been taking a hit lately. However, some altcoins are shining across social channels. Will this equate to mitigated drops, and even outsized performance once the market flips? More Industry Statistics |
|
|
|
 People are moving towards stablecoins as the Crypto market's fear/greem meter reached all-time low. |
|
|
|
 - Tether hits $5B mcap — link- As traders get liquidated, BitMEX scores 2,612 BTC — link- CMC claims $275B volume — link- Crypto market cap gets demolished — link- $4M in uncollateralized DAI — link- Bitcoin shows high correlation with the stock market — link |
|
|
|
 In the short term, all asset classes seem to converge. |
|
|
|
 Tuesday, March 17 in DAO Maker Chat () Learn about AVA: www.avalabs.org👉 Submit Your QuestionsEmin Gün Sirer created Karma in 2003, the first cryptocurrency to use a PoW consensus mechanism. He has made considerable contributions to the earliest days of operating systems and even decentralized protocols. He went on to publish the Avalanche consensus, which is going to be implemented into AVA, a development led by AVA Labs. |
|
|
|
 Today, Bittrex has finally announced a wide variety of new benefits and features for traders. Some of the benefits include overall lower fees, a brand new referral program, several improvements on the interface of the website and mobile and more! “As we update our exchange, we will continue to offer reliable trading options on the world’s most secure blockchain technology platform,” said Bittrex Co-Founder Richie Lai. “Today’s updates represent our continued focus on listening to, and engaging with, our customers.” If you want to check out the full list of Features and Benefits, click here. ( https://medium.com/bittrex/trade-your-way-new-bittrex-features-and-benefits-for-cryptocurrency-traders-3a750dd29d4a) |
|
|
|
According to your profile: 'In general: Do not trust anything that is written by this user. I would also avoid trading with them' So why should any user trust you?
Because your name is not Lauda and you have a reputation to establish? You voiced your opinion, great, now we would appreciate it if you stopped spamming the thread. Throughout 2019 and 2020, you have gotten 3 pretty bad ratings stating that your opinion shouldn't be trusted. |
|
|
|
 Bittrex Global has just announced it will roll out a bunch of new and exciting features on March 9th. The exchange has recently turned six years old and will share some additional improvements and other news in 5 days. 'Here’s some of the highlights from the past year: Launched a new Mobile App on iOS and Android, making it easier than ever to trade on the go. Announced improvements to the trading UI featuring Tradingview. Secured $300 million in Digital Asset Insurance to enhance protection. Announced 8 new states for U.S. dollar fiat trading for corporate and individual investors with 26 fiat markets. Fiat trading is now available in 44 states and Puerto Rico.' Read more on the official Medium Channel of Bittrex |
|
|
|
Thanks for the opportunity provided to be a part of the campaign, but it looks like spamming when we keep on creating five threads every week. Can you please go through the rules for a while and request the client for a change.
These rules are only applied for the first 2 weeks. We don't even know if the campaign will be extended. It's only 10 threads total. |
|
|
|
Thank you a lot for your acceptance.
I've just worn signature.
Could you better explain how you warn people..? Or maybe worn? or..? vycl87 is wearing the signature, hence it is worn. Nice try jack05, but you weren't able to warn anyone with that one.
anyone feel like running a book to see who tanks in the first few weeks? Our starting players are as follows:  According to your profile: 'In general: Do not trust anything that is written by this user. I would also avoid trading with them' So why should any user trust you? |
|
|
|
This looks for me as a certain manner which should not be enforced during a campaign. Besides, the payment for the participants is ridiculous, taking into account the effort they should put in order to accomplish the requirements. Even more ridiculous seems the discrepancy between payments for Sr. Members and payments for Heroes / Legendaries. As I can see, a Sr. Member earns 400% less than Heroes / Legendaries. I think I never saw such a discrepancy before. In addition, the rule "In total, its 5 OP Posts + 5 Posts on the first page of a thread and 10 more on the 1,2 or 3rd page of any thread." is supposed only to bring spam, as I find to be extremely difficult for a legit user to accomplish it. This campaign is a great example for how things should not be done and I'll add this exemple to the thread Are there needed general (common sense) rules for signature campaigns?. I have warned OP in his signature campaign thread this is a bad idea all around, and you're right this is extremely difficult for any non spamming user to do. I for one would not join such a spam promoting campaign, this guy is just a walking billboard of how not to do a campaign. Honestly the company behind this needs to be aware of what a shit show they are trying to run. Edit: I noticed OP seems to be a topic creation spammer himself, so he probably sees no issue in it. 10 topics in one day just this week, all the same category altcoin discussion(Some within 5 minutes of each other).These topics all have an extremely similar format and are all based off of daomaker.com a site that deals in social mining but it's just low quality spam to me. Second edit: i am under the impression this account was sold, it was dead silent for around a year and a half then came back posting unlike the previous post, it is constantly making post for daomaker.com since coming back. I'm going to snoop a bit more but there's something fishy going on here. I understand that you are probably angry because you don't like the pay, I see you have tried to participate in 2 different sig campaigns in the last few days. |
|
|
|
- Minimum 5 OP posts (Meaning threads created) every week.
- Minimum of 5 constructive posts on the first page of a thread.
- And an additional minimum of 10 more constructive posts up to the third page of a thread.
So you're looking for sixteen people to create between them a total of 80 new threads (every week) and then keep coming back to those threads week after week to effectively necro bump them if they are not popular. (Mods delete posts if the same poster posts days apart without any other poster participating, so you'll end up with participants posting "quality" posts only to have those posts deleted because no one else has posted.). Ad visibility/exposure. If a topic takes off most people won't browse through all the posts, and regardless of the topic length, the first 1-3 pages are more likely to be seeing more views. Participants of campaigns with such rules can expect to be watched closely by users and mods alike.
Might want to re-think how your campaign is conducted. Hmm, no, you need better reading comprehension. It clearly states you need to make 5 threads per week, and then 15 more normal posts. It says 'Minimum of 5 constructive posts on the first page of a thread.' notice the 'page of a thread' not your own thread, any thread but it simply has to be on the first page. Not that hard to understand I would say. I will be posting the spreadsheet with accepted participants in a bit! |
|
|
|
as far as I can see the campaign is looking for a total of 16 members which is a totally insignificant number Sure, but it sets the precedent that this kind of behavior is both desirable to the advertiser and permitted by the forum. I suspect we might see other, larger, campaigns start to ask for similar posting requirements. For a good poster, it might not be a problem, but we know that ~90% of bounty spammers aren't good posters. Most will open threads which have been discussed 100 times before, or are simply legalized plagiarism in the form of stolen content with a link at the bottom. We also know that bounty spammers don't just see their posts being trashed and accept it. Any thread of theirs which is trashed will simply prompt them to create more so they can still hit their quota. They will not get paid then. They are doing that anyways, our campaign is not going to change that. The admin of the forum could have blocked signatures a long time ago if he really wanted. |
|
|
|
|
To make it easier, I will eventually post a spreadsheet tomorrow with everyone accepted.
|
|
|
|
|
Your comments are appreciated but we are not changing the rules right now as I have asked already if they were ok. I would appreciate it if you guys stopped spamming this thread while complaining about spam.
|
|
|
|
 Only 2 weeks ago, DeFi was growing at a phenomenal pace, with locked value blazing past the $1B milestone and reaching an ATH of $1.2B. After the bZx exploits, however, the value locked in DeFi plummeted below the coveted $1B mark; the 22.1% crash landed the segment at $926.7M. The locked value is significantly lower in all but 2 of the top 10 DeFi apps. This has helped the two outliers, Aave and Compound, significantly extend their market share in the DeFi pie. |
|
|
|
Username link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=529754Rank : Legendary Post Count: 4180 BTC Address: 38fDscY2csdM9SxiSpCGngmvPT24RJ9J1M @ crypto1010 you didn't put the details that we need to fill also, the code is not working for me as it seems it exceeds the 4k max char these last characters are not included in the 4k max - [/td][/tr][/table][/center] [/quote] Accepted. Accepted. Hmm, accepted but posts on Bounties do not count. |
|
|
|
There is a problem with signature code. I suppose this should be fixed.  Text should be centered. And the part "Join now and claim sign-up reward!." is simply not visible under posts. I have a feeling that this signature is too bit to fit under user posts  Hmm, which browser are you using?  I see it like this |
|
|
|
Just curious, why no Hero member spots?
Ok, Hero members are now accepted but only high-quality members. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
