Tell the boss that bot with the .51c worth of waves at the ask is retarded

Hello! Could someone advice, is SONM the the main competitor for Elastic? If yes, what advantages XEL have, comparing with SONM. Will much appreciated for clarification.

Just found out about this project and glanced over it and it is very promising. I wanted try mining BIS but I am a CPU miner and based on network hashrate, it doesn't seem worth it. However I will try to buy some from Cryptopia and will set up the node.

is it possible to have a BIS wallet without running a node? Light wallet download somewhere?

edit: have used the wallet.py download on github, but seems like problems. my virus scanner tells me there's viruses in wallet.exe and virustotal.com tell me the same. Any proof there is none?

Something where to start; now we're going ahead to future listings (That we've already paid ..)

Dear Forwarders,

Please find attached the LWF Exchange Listing Announcement. 

https://lwf.support/2018/05/08/lwf-exchange-listing-announcement/

This announcement is a little delayed as we had to wait for some initial withdrawal/deposit issues to be corrected.  I can confirm deposits and withdrawals have been tested today and they are working very well.

We hope you will join us in celebrating this major milestone for LWF!

The LWF Team

Well, this metric is only useful for the currency use case I think.
Some coins are specifically targeting a huge tx throughput.
This is not an ultimate goal.
For Bismuth, see point 7 https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@aetsen/bismuth-developer-interview-hclivess
(but Having an insane amount of tx per second is not a current bismuth goal)

What's more interesting is why you would need a huge tx throughput.
apart for mainstream currency use (which is just one small use case for a blockchain platform), this is not a real concern, at least atm.

If what you want before all (but you'll have to tell why, because it will come at the expanse of other metrics, or safety, or decentralization, or features) is a huge tx throughput,
then blockchains are not the best fit. Look into DAG instead.

As far as Bismuth is concerned, the core thing is that it's not built upon an existing protocol/platform with fixed limits.
Bismuth is a new protocol/platform, from scratch, evolving.
And it's evolving fast, with priorities shifting fast ,also.
What I mean, is that atm, tx throughput is not an issue, far from that.
So this is not a current dev priority and the metric makes no sense: it's more than the current usage requires, so the real metric is irrelevant.
IF (and only IF) it becomes an issue, then the team has many ways to answer the problems, and they will come quick.
Some work already is done, or under work, to reduce tx related bandwidth usage for instance.

Then, wait until you see what we have in our bag for Masternodes technology.
This tech could be used way further to offload a lot of tx, storage, bandwidth from the main chain, and that, will be a real game changer, way more than a single metric.

Can you be more precise?
What is your use case, what scale are you refering to?

THE LAST WORD on this till

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3QQJ18toPo  

 Update from the DEV...  

I haven't noticed anything on Cryptopia in years, because I never give complete and utter control of my currency to non-caring morons.

I'm not sure what you are asking.

Not speaking for all, obviously, as some of us mine Universal Currency in order to use Universal Currency as a currency.

/\was a glitch now 5000 and up we go? lol weeee