Well done Mr. Spread!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg9842069#msg9842069

If something needs to change with the code to make this happen, please let the Spreadcoin dev know.

I have five DRK masternodes and would love to have 5 SPR masternodes without having to pay more for hosting.

I'm no programming expert but was wondering, would it be possible for the Darkcoin clones like Spreadcoin that use masternodes to have DRK masternodes mix for them and vice versa for an extra layer of anonymity?

In the meantime, I have to figure out how to get Amazon to sell their books for Darkcoin or Bitcoin, LOL.  I'm so excited, we're going to put my hubbie's book, really a family project, up for sale on Amazon soon.  I must say I really wish we could sell it for crypto, but they don't do it yet

Hey, im wondering if i can point a rented rig at Spread?

How would i go about doing this via solo mining?

Thanks

Well, I want to have least some working prototype before such announcements.

Marketing wise, no one is going to use a coin named spread.

Thanks man, that is what I was exactly looking for.


My last question. Running the multiple instance of that priv key have any affect on masternodes? Lets say I imported 3 privekey to same wallet, can I use masternode start command? I dont think so, since all will have different conf file, but let me hear it from you guys

Ok now I got the new address 0 and dumppriv key as well as it is encrypted it and saved the wallet.dat backup. So how can I just dump the address to another wallet (just the address, not the wallet.dat) ?

And how do I get this to a cold wallet?

I will start working on integrating DarkCoin features: masternodes and darksend. I will not copy-paste them blindly, maybe I will make a few improvements if possible. After this we will test it on testnet to see how it is working. Once it is ready I will set a hardfork point and make new builds, I want to make this transition flawless. I understand that there is a lot of impatience, people want everything to happen instantly but I don't think we need a rush here.

Since masternodes and darksend work for DarkCoin I see no reason why it wouldn't work for SpreadCoin. If you have any suggestions about how masternodes/darksend can be made better you can say it.

I will leave the names Masternode and DarkSend as is, I don't see any reason to rename them.

Also I want to write a white paper about my changes and original DarkCoin features themselves, current DarkCoin white papers are either outdated or describe only part of the necessary information. I want my cryptocurrency to have a good description about what it is and how it works.

Nvidia GT 730 desktop PC

I've had at least one hundred ready to go live for a while now, but am traveling until Sunday, I'll be importing the priv keys & firing them up on Monday if all goes to plan

okay server mode running the wallet and a browser error 127.0.0.1:41677 {"result":null,"error":{"code":-32700,"message":"Parse error"},"id":null}
Spreadminer  running and not accepted shares

Wallet starting -server command?

How to solomine nvidia card?

rpcuser=rpcuser
rpcpassword=rpcpass
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
listen=1
server=1
daemon=1

@thelonecrouton tell us the truth, that's not your real mugshot, is it?

Yeah I see that but who do they belong to ?

cheers

About 1 hour.  I have no idea how I did it.  I was lost in a horrendous click flurry.  Seriously scary how you can just find yourself clicking away as if it isn't real money.  I do know that on one occasion I accidentally placed a large 10% bet and won!  I started off carefully and ended up barely even concentrating.

£500 lost.  Could have been £12.5k gained.

The house (and maths!) won.  I definitely lost.

Nice write-up Walter! I would like to point out a couple of differences between masternodes and stocks/bonds/certs.of deposit etc. In each of the above cases the money invested is still flowing in the economy. It is simply the investor who looses access to it in exchange for a hoped for return. In the case of a stock or bond the holder has a promise while the issuer has the cash and proceeds to use it to buy goods and services. Those who provide the goods or services now have the cash and the flow proceeds. In the case of "savings accts" or certs. of deposits, the funds are loaned out and used to create even more funds on a fractional reserve basis, thus further "greasing the wheels of commerce" and paving the way  for societies collapse as the new funds are loaned into existence WITHOUT creating the interest which must be payed back. In any case, unless the funds are kept as cash in the equivalent of a mattress (and losing value to inflation), the funds continue to flow, while the initiator no longer has access to them, and must wait some time before seeing them return to his/her ability to spend them.

Masternodes on the other hand extract existing (or newly created) funds for services rendered in exchange for keeping funds out of circulation. There are a number of subtle trade-offs being made here, the most notable of which is present return in exchange for present restraint in spending. (A side benefit is the reduction of the likelihood of various forms of attack.)  Unlike stocks, bonds, or savings accounts, there is no commitment involved, and the funds may be immediately spent with NO penalty. Saving in this model is deflationary, as opposed to the inflationary saving of fractional debt based economies. Not only do masternodes work in an anti-inflationary manner they encourage savings as they lead to the accumulation of an appreciating asset in addition to simply holding an asset expected to appreciate. This works against the pump and dump cycles so prevalent to this point, and serves to cause the currency to appreciate in value as opposed to inflating. At the same time the fundamental utility of DRK as privacy protection and point-of-sale utility will work to drive it into circulation as adoption increases thus limiting the effects of hoarding.

This latter benefit will become more pronounced as the lack of privacy inherent in Bitcoin becomes well known. At this point in time, Bitcoin has only three raisons d'être; privacy, international transfers, and hoarding in hopes of appreciation. With the first removed, the second becomes doubtful, leaving only the third. Sadly, it quickly becomes a case of hoarding something nobody wants; values fall, and then fewer wish to hoard.

The promise of Bitcoin has become blunted as the mystique of privacy has been peeled away by advances in monitoring and blockchain analysis. It seems that its value proposition is now based on the hopes of deep-pocket Wall Street tycoons who would not invest such large amounts without expecting a return. That return of course, is based on the promise of States and their Banks (better said Banks and their States) providing safety through regulation. Hence in coming days I expect we will see some very nice and profitable boom and bust cycles with Bitcoin, accompanied by the loss of its fungibility. The States and Banks will continue to decry its use as a tool of criminals, while at the same time rounding up hoards of drug dealers, pedophiles, and tax-dodgers (who should know better), while the larger criminals continue making profits and eliminating their small-time competitors.

Sorry, I have wandered far from my initial purpose. I am tempted to delete much of this post, but maybe somebody will find my droning interesting.

Peace to you all,

Strix