Seeing the same, in the place where i live, government officials are also participating, especially those police who love this gambling. Gamblers are free to play since they are heavily protected.
Police professionals here in our country are not allowed to participate in any form of gambling, especially in gambling like cockfighting. That was prohibited because it might lead to self-interest and abuse. It will lead to kicking on the service permanently. You will never see police here playing that gambling game that's why as much as possible they are hiding their identities just to play this gambling game. |
|
|
|
Note: Buying Bonus Buy allows us to win more money, while playing normally does not guarantee we can win some money.
Allowing you to win more money of course , but what is the assurance that you can take those money out? i mean we knew that in gambling the more you win is the more you wanted to double and ending up losing everything than winning lol. just gamble with chance of luck , limit your expenses and try not to be hooked this is how you can win generously than challenging the game and casino that we all knew not worth doing longer. If you will analyze that statement, it's true that buying a bonus game will allow is to win more money since you will buy the special feature of the game without waiting for your luck waiting on that bonus game to appear on manual spinning. It has something like big multipliers of course if we will able to hit it. Still and it's obvious that luck still plays a big role in us to win in a bonus game. It's just that playing a bonus game will give us more profits compared to a manual game obviously. Again, only if our luck is there. |
|
|
|
More likely at least for me, a Charlo fight will be great to see. They have been going on back and forth on social media and I will say that Crawford own Charlo on that one hehe. And if I recalled it right, Jermell Charlo and Terence Crawford already exchanged heated arguments before. Maybe too overconfident for Crawford's camp to say that no one can beat them in the 154 but they can prove it once they are settled. But since Crawford is a free agent, I think another cherry-picked boxer will be matched to him if he will still stay on 147. |
|
|
|
In martingale, a gambler increases the bet size to double in the hope to recover the loss from the previous bet. I have tried it a few times & to be honest with you, I have never had a good return on my bets; I have lost most of the time.
On the other hand, the Anti martingale strategy is- to double the bet size when you are winning & halving the bet size when you are losing. In such a condition, when you are winning; you are doubling the size & you will lose from your winning. WEell, this strategy is more risky I guess though some have told it as less risky than martingale.
Have you ever tried ti? What's your opinion? Which one is more risky; Martingale or Anti Martingale?
Don't want to try it as that might be the shortest and quickest version of Martingale. We won't also be able to feel much about our profits since every time we will won, it's mandatory to risk that amount the next round. In terms of the level of riskiness, I see that both are on the same level. In the end, if we try to be aggressive, the result will be the same, losing. |
|
|
|
Yes, our options will be,
(a) rounds 1-3
(b) rounds 4-6
We all know how powerful Inoue is as we have seen how he destroyed Nonito. And if Butler will try to muscle and go fight inside with Inoue it will be his doom.
So I'm speculating that Inoue could either score a KO win in less than 6 rounds against Butler. And the odds for this two are very attractive, we just have to make the right choice.
The odds for Inoue winning in Rounds 4-6 do have good odds. @3.65 can be considered placing a bet. Butler has to do everything to survive Rounds 1-3 but knowing Inoue's much more deadly punches when his stamina is still at FULL, there's a thing in my mind that Butler might not last even at Round 2. Donaire is much more powerful and versatile compare to Butler but he only lasted Round 1 on their second match. It's hard to decide what betting option is a good choice as this fight is a distant gap fight where it's even the first time for me to see a unification match where the other champion does have odds of around @14 to win. |
|
|
|
So the other betting option are comes up.  I'm surprised with the winning method odds for Inoue via KO since it's really small, there's no way anyone want to bet that. The winner & round range seems to be more interesting, based on the odds many people expect Inoue will beat Butler in the early round since the odds is only 1.48x. It's worth if you want to bet with huge amount, but I will take a risk to bet Inoue & 4-6 because I think Butler will have a preparation to survive against Inoue, although it won't last long. Wonderful options but what do others mostly take here? As expected, Inoue winning in rounds 1 to 3 does have low odds because the chances that Inoue will really win in those rounds are high. Maybe a good one betting on Inoue winning Round 4-6. No way this fight will reach in Decision in Favor of Inoue. |
|
|
|
Coming from a third-world country, $1 is already a big amount it's equivalent to 2 lottery tickets here and you still have $0.20 change I consider the $1 deposit as a good consideration for people coming from a third-world country, for $1 they can test the
the site, but there should be a minimum threshold to withdraw, or there will be congestion if they will allow no minimum withdrawal.
Gambling sites don't need to give that consideration to users from 3rd world countries. If the budget is really not that big, these people should not try their luck at gambling. A $1 deposit also requires fees and if multiple $1 will be deposited at different times, these people are just wasting some money on fees. There should be a local gambling place that is present at these places. That's where they can gamble their low-budget amount and not on online gambling sites. Like it or not, there will always be gambling sites like that who care about small players and that is why they don't set a minimum deposit but just minimum withdrawal. This is to avoid spamming the network as what @robelneo said. There are fees for depositing but if they will use cheap alts, they will still be left with something. They can try their luck on games with huge multipliers and If they ever they get lucky, they can turn their dollar to a decent amount. There are offline gambling but they are not that accessible compared to online. You will need to commute and pay. Can't imagine how will be left with your one dollar if you will insist of gamble on them. Still, if the budget is really low, why gamble? Can we just rely on luck? Can we just depend on it? People might not realized that even they are doing small bets, they don't realized that the actual spending is now higher. If that is easy to achieve, then we shouldn't have any financial problems now. Try to read the main post. In that situation, it does not make sense for me to just gamble. |
|
|
|
I normally buy the bonus game because I feel my winning chances are higher by doing it. Not a fan of free spins as I prefer the bonus game the other way. Free spins are different from the free game feature of any slot. We should just remember that not all the time, winning is guaranteed in a bonus game. Still a slot machines right? So I don’t see any advantage of buying bonus because its still a game of luck and slow machines are system generated, you can’t win always on that machine. Bonuses might give you higher chance though but not guaranteed, so personally I prefer not to buy any and just enjoy playing normally. Slot machines are still fun to play, prefer not to use any bonus option.
I understand that's what you think but to be able to understand more what the bonus game is, make some experience.  |
|
|
|
Ok, suddenly the casino you're playing asks you for proof of income to be able to withdraw your winnings and to keep your account in good standing, your bankroll every month is $500 and you provide proof of salary that you are making $500 net every month, will they accept that proof will they accept that you are putting all your salary for gambling, will this violate the principle of gamble for fun, because you are working to gamble based on your proof income.
I want to ask first if there's a case before where a gambling site asks for proof of income. If yes, can you share it? If that thing will be asked of me, that's already too much since the gambling site has nothing to do with our source of income as long as we were able to make deposits on their site legally. They supposed should not care about that part of our personal life. Is that happened to you, OP? |
|
|
|
One can't or shouldn't quit betting because of recent bad luck. Afterall, when you won, or used to win, you thought of yourself as better and best. Its a choice to live by if that's what you want, but you must avoid friends and places where you would normally visit to bet or better still restructure your schedule in a way and manner that the interest is shoved aside.
Out of frustration and disappointment, you will really see some gamblers saying they will stop betting because of that worst experience. Not realizing that their mind just want to rest a bit but believe me, after several weeks or even days, these people will come back in action. There's no need to quit as maybe these people are just being carried away. If we feel are now ready again to face the risks, we can always comeback. |
|
|
|
Now you have $100,000 in your account, pure savings, and you don't need this amount of money to cover your daily expenses. Obviously it's good/free money to use at will. Let's say if you deposit the money into a bank and the annual interst rate is 3%, you will get a steady interest income year by year. If you use this money to buy Bitcoin, let's say the BTC drops to $17,000, you'll buy less than 6 Bitcoins. In the long run, what would you do with this money ? And why ?
My priority is always, Business. I don't like to depend on Bitcoin's moon price in the future and only rely on that. Part of that $100,000 can be doubled while waiting for Bitcoin's moon price. Maybe 50% will go to pure business while the other will be used on purchasing bitcoin regardless of what's the price I think that would be a better entry. Since you mentioned that this $100,000 has nothing to do to cover my daily expenses, there's not much pressure for me to always keep my business in profit. In that way, I can strategize what's the best thing to do in my business without pressure. |
|
|
|
Hey,guys! Can you recommend an exchanger with the best rates?
Maybe there is a website where
In most cases, you will find reasonable rates if you deal with a person to person transactions or P2P compared when trading against the direct conversion of an exchange. Try to check the Binance P2P feature on Binance.com but even if you check it out, can you consider those rates as "Best" or it will satisfy you? You can also reach out to your local community to see if there's a direct buy and sell service there although you need to be vigilant as lots of scammers will surely watch you. But as a user who browses the internet for a long, I'm sure you should already know how to protect yourself. |
|
|
|
|
Technically, the answer is "high risk" as everything is speculative.
I don't really trust new projects being introduced on Binance as most of the time, they are just being driven by the hype.
We should have already learned our lesson from those projects who did some launchpad on Binance.
But it's your call if you want to get involved or not.
|
|
|
|
|
Doing trading while at the same time having a day job is not that easy to fulfill.
While others can commit both 100%, not all people have the ability to do both at the same time. I'm really amazed at those people who can do that multi-tasking jobs as both trading and day jobs are really stressful.
With seriousness and eagerness to learn, others find the best way how to do both at the same time while still being responsible for their usual tasks outside the web.
|
|
|
|
Just today I made a transaction on p2p using GCASH to receive my proceeds.
ang problema, may na receive akong text na pumasok na daw yung pera ko sa gcash pero upon checking my balance, wala naman pala.
Meron rin palang scammer sa Binance kahit verified na ang user.
meron bang naka experience tulad ng nito?
Be vigilant lang. Iyong iba kasi makareceive lang ng text confirmation di na nila chinecheck sa mismong application. "Walang ma-sscam kung walang magpapascam" Basic pa nga galawan dyan sa Binance P2P ewan ko bakit may naloloko pa. No offense sa mga nabiktima a pero sana paganahin ang alertness at common sense kapag ganyang pera ang transaction. |
|
|
|
Hi guys I wanted to ask some of big family members who have experience in crypto and also in gambling. But my experience is not good in gambling.
If someone wants to start a Gambling casino online with Cryptocurrency than how much money is needed. I think that 100k dollars initial capital would be enough to satrt a better casino. Cause we have to promote and also do other such promotions.
So what are your thoughts?
$100,000 might be enough if we just talk about starting a casino. But once you are now in the actual operation, that's where your budget might be put in jeopardy. You can't expect profits to flow right away on your casino. With lots of already established casino websites here, it's hard for a new player to make some entry while trying how to allocate $100,000 capital where in fact, once you started your casino, the amount of your money might now reduce by over 75%. Bankroll, operational cost, non-stop marketing - maybe consider trying other businesses instead. |
|
|
|
|
Request For a No Collateral Loan
Required BTC Amount: BTC0.01
Estimated Loan Duration: 60 days
BTC Address: (via Stake tip) | Stake username: goinmerry
Thanks, DS!
|
|
|
|
No Contest result for Casimero but for us, he is the winner if just Akaho will not acted strangely and continue to fight.
It is obvious that Akaho was hurt, it is just a matter of time on that round to putting Akaho on his knee but the referee to the rescue. Another thing, if that was a true illegal blow, they could have made the ringside physician look at Akaho asap, but it took them several minutes to do so making me think that is indeed one of the plans of the officiating official to save Akaho when a thing like that happens. Let's not go in that discussion because if we say that the officiating officials are unfair and they favored Akaho, then we would've also said in general that Japanese officials in boxing organization are unprofessional. We know that they are not like that as they are the most professional people we know as it's on their culture already not to cheat or something like that. Let's just say that Akaho was the one who is unprofessional and scared to add defeats on his record that is why he decided to have that act that give embarrassment to the whole Japanese boxing community. I'd say that they aren't letting that one slide and will investigate about it. Who is to blame then? I know it's not a Japanese trait but it's clear that those involved are doing shit on that match. You can't blame others if they thought something bad about how the fight turned out. Akaho is a disgrace, and so are the officials and referess there. They are putting a negative image on the whole Japanese community. |
|
|
|
|
From the way you shared an example, I don't see why it won't be called gambling.
Everyone put money, there's reward money, there's a prize pool, and you all guys compete for it to win.
I thought at first that you are referring to the usual "pay to earn" games but gambling inside a game itself. I don't see such games in casinos.
|
|
|
|
For now, let's wait for the result of this match that's already predictable by 99.9%.
We already know who might win in their upcoming fight but let's see if Butler prepared a hidden strategy that can beat the monster. At least give Butler 1% chance of winning as a sign of respect, saying 99.9% chance for Inoue, that only gives Butler 0.01% chance. I know upset happens in boxing, but just like guys, I don't see it happening because Inoue are just too good for Butler. So you are saying that I'm disrespecting Butler? Wake up mate, we are just stating facts here. Not because I'm not giving any chance for Butler to win, it does mean that I'm not respecting him. Ok, I will give Butler a 1% chance to win so that you will see me respecting him.  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
